Israel can't be trusted to probe Gaza flotilla raid, say Rachel Corrie's parents
Corrie, a U.S. citizen, was struck and killed in 2003 by a bulldozer as she and other activists tried to prevent the razing of Gaza homes.
By Natasha Mozgovaya Tags: Israel news Gaza flotilla GazaIsrael cannot be trusted to conduct a reliable investigation of its raid of the Gaza-bound aid flotilla, the family of Rachel Corrie, an American human rights activist who was killed in Gaza, wrote to U.S. United Nations envoy Susan Rice earlier this month.
|
The MV Rachel Corrie. |
| Photo by: AP |
Corrie, a U.S. citizen, was 24 when she was struck and killed in 2003 by a bulldozer as she and other activists tried to stop Israel razing homes in Rafah by using their bodies as human shields.
The driver said he didn't see her, and the Israel Defense Forces has ruled her death an accident - a version her parents reject.
In the letter obtained by Haaretz, Cindy and Craig Corrie referred to the May 31 raid of the Gaza flotilla which resulted in the deaths of 9 activists, saying they wished to express their "continuing sorrow and outrage over the recent killings and injuries aboard the Mavi Marmara and other vessels that sailed with the Freedom Flotilla to break the siege of Gaza."
"We write also to inform you," the Corrie family added, "of the longstanding, U. S. government position that Israel has failed to conduct a thorough, credible and transparent investigation into our daughter’s killing and that after repeated attempts at the highest levels, U.S. officials have been unable to secure such an investigation."
Rachel Corrie's parents' then said they believed it was "important that Israel’s raid on the flotilla be investigated independently," adding that "while the Israeli Government has a responsibility to conduct its own internal investigation, our experience leads us to believe that Israel cannot be counted upon to reliably investigate itself."
According to the letter, an Israeli court found what it called "serious grounds for suspicion that the cause of death … was the result of a crime," but that instead of following through with the case, the court instead "closed Rachel’s file with no further action and without the required report of the autopsy results or any other report of evidence or inquiry from the Military Police or other investigators."
"Our personal experience has made it all too painfully clear that the Israeli government is unable or unwilling to adequately investigate itself and that the U.S. does not, apparently, have the ability or will to compel such an investigation," the Corries said.
The letter to UN representative Rice concluded with Cindy and Craig Corrie urging the U.S. to support a "truly independent investigation into the raid on the Mavi Marmara, one that is complete, impartial, and trustworthy."
"We add our voice to those calling upon the United States and the international community to insist that an independent investigation be conducted," they added.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
when the Achille Lauro was hijacked and an American Jew - sitting in his wheelchair - was killed the world sat glibly by. Over the years those involved were released from jail and those on furloughs disappeared. All quiet- no one cared. But when antagonists on boats are shot in defence....my God...the whole world is in an uproar. F-in hypocrites.
United States President Barak Obama warned Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan that an international probe into Israel's deadly raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla could have negative consequences for Turkey, British Arabic-language daily al-Hayat reported Saturday. Turkish PM Erdogan and U.S. President Obama Turkish PM Erdogan and U.S. President Obama at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington on April 12, 2010 Photo by: AP According to the report, Obama warned Erdogan that the international probe which Turkey has demanded could turn into a "double edged sword," as it could lead to accusations against the passengers on board the Turkish-flagged Mavi Marmara ship, some of whom were members of the pro-Palestinian IHH organization.
Your daughters one sided obsession with her fanatical point of view shows that she was a long way from home, both physically and metaphorically as she was unable to appraise both sides of the conflict. She shielded herself from the Israeli narrative choosing to allow herself to be brainwashed. This is where you failed as parents.
they lose a child = very sad. but actually she was doing a bad thing supporting terrorists maybe she just naive but that does not automatically qualify the parents as to being international polictical experts all the same its antisemitism anti israel anti jew
An investigation by the U.N. into the flotilla raid would be as objective as the views espoused by Corrie and her parents. Rachel Corrie was not a hero or a saint; she was an ISM instigator and was the author of her own misfortune.
...now I know.
the only country that will step on your throat and beat you with a bat and at the same time shriek in pain as though it was being beaten itself.
It's always sad when young people die, especially misguided ones like Corrie, who placed herself squarely where she didn't belong. The poor thing clearly fancied herself a heroine. Pity she died, but the bulldozer's driver was not to blame.
Were you there ??
who is sitting high up. ISM likes foreign deaths
Poor driver. He just wanted to demolish a Palestinian family's home. The evil foreign terrorist girl surely had violent intentions sitting there and getting in the way of his bulldozer. He had all the right to run over her. The driver is the victim.
Israel can't be trusted. Period.
There are 2 sides to a story not just Rachel's. I watched the enforced removal of the people from their homes when the defense force removed them physically. What was not shown or reported was a group of Arab's laughing and yelling "We are going to push you into the sea". Maybe Rachel's parents can ask for an independent inquiry about that day . Why the videos were not recording the whole scene.
no doubt about that..
Why is Haaretz giving a continued forum for stoking the flames of blind anti-israel sentiment to the parents of a deceased terrorist sympathizer. Rachel Corrie was not a hero! It is sad for her parents that she is dead, but they merely defend the hollowness and hatefulness of her views so she can be perceived as a martyr instead of a hate-mongering, self important reactionary knee-jerk liberal ignoramus whose thinly veiled sole purpose was to deny the jewish people the only true haven it has known since the time of Christ and find common cause with those terrorists who would murder them, young and old, religious and secular, soldier and civilian alike--in cold blood.
The dentist whose home was about to be demolished, was a terrorist? Has he been arrested? Lay off the laughing gas
well done
sounds like what to you?
bile flowing The more in-excusable the nature of Israel's actions, the more their hated drips A driver of heavy machinery is obliged to shut down if un-authorised persons are in the vicinity. Rachel Corrie didn't throw herself in the path of the vehicle, she stood her ground, challenging the driver to adhere to best practices. HE FAILED.
It's quite simple
for anyone to say Rachel supported terror tells me they have a gross misunderstanding of what she was doing in Gaza as well as what Israel was doing in Gaza. I hope folks will Google Rachel Corrie Myths & Facts on the Rachel's Words website. The family whose home Rachel was defending from demolition when she was crushed to death had never been suspected or accused of terrorism. The 3,500 or so homes razed in Rafah were not razed for military necessity, as documented by Human Rts Watch in its "Razing Rafah" report. That means those demolitions were war crimes. The essence of Judaism, said the historic Hillel, is not doing to others anything you'd yourself find abhorrent. Who in Israel, America or anywhere in the world would want their home and all their belongings and sometimes a family member crushed by a bulldozer? Israel has demolished more than 24,000 Palestinian homes since 1967. And an offer for peace has been on the table since 2002 - The Arab League, or Saudi proposal -- ratified by every Arab nation and the majority if not all non-Arab Muslim nations...and agreed to by Hamas. So where's the impasse to peace? Looks like it's in Israel's p-i-e-c-e plan.
Yet , it supports terrorists organisations as Hamas and anarchists , such as Corrie
this paper actually gives the world hope that. humanity still exist in Israil .
AMAZING!!! Now, about this 'support' for terrorist organizations. Thx.... I look forward to reading your evidence...
The scary part is look at your rating. Except for me, all the other raters disagree with you. Haaretz and its readers scares me, how can people have so little self respect.
like the rest of the "civilised" world, I fully support the call for an independent investigation. however, what good will it serve. as illustrated by a catalogue of Israeli "atrocities", Israel will continue to ignore what the "civilised" world thinks. as long as the U.S. supports (behind the scenes) Israel, in whatever it does. The real investigation should be "why does Israel have such a hold on the U.S."
You can not murder and then get away with a "sorry". It does not work that way. Justice will be served one way or another.
Israel does not say "sorry". It murders and then demands to know what all the fuss is about.
no one condones murder but by definition that assumes a legal definition of what happened... I had a friend who was killed in a civilian accident by a bulldozer (have u ever at in driver's seat of a Caterpillar D9 ?) because the driver could not see him...it was not murder.
Israel acts with impunity and if there is no tomorrow because, up to now, it knows, especially in its relationship with the US, that it can get away with it. Let us all hope that Ambassdaor Oren is correct in his apparent reference of a "tectonic rift" in relations between the countries. This is the only relationship that truly matters to Israel and only when such a rift is taking place will we see genuine change in Israel's brutish behavior.
Israel cannot be trusted to conduct self investigation
can you be trusted to read let alone comment?
First their daughter is in the wrong country doing the wrong things, then they sue Israel for her death, and now they are authorities on international relations. Let us not forget Rachel Corrie burning the American flag in front of a whole lot of children, teaching them anarchy.
"First their daughter is in the wrong country" .... and what country would that be, Fredy? .... "doing the wrong things" ... that would be her attempt to prevent the illegal demolition of houses by the occupying power, I take it? In what way is that "wrong", Fredy?
Their misguided daughter through her life away for something she did not fully understand and that didn't care for her kind (American non-muslim) in the first place. That is very, very sad but it doesn't give her parents the right to question Israels actions on the ILLEGAL flotilla.
correction - there daughter was brutaly murdered by the israeli soldiers. Just listen to her friends that were there. I believe them more than the PR people of the iseali government. Justice will prevail.
Why is it always the muslims against the non-muslims? Seems to me everyone accept the muslims make that distinction. Give it up, if you had any humanity in you would, you understand Rachel Corrie's reasons for trying to stop a house where families lived in, to be demolished. And it has NOTHING to do with caring for her American non-muslims, rather caring for HUMANS in general!!
which one do you believe. Her "friends" told inconsistent, contradictory stories.
the houses being bulldozed were covering tunnels through which death dealing equipment was transported. Maybe the occupants didn't want that but Hamas arranged it.
had tried to kidnap them during their visit there in 2003 .
Give up, your ability as a propagandist is atrocious
absolute sweden - That is an absolute lie you should stop whatever you are drinking.
Indeed, that her killing has been essentially swept under the carpet by the Israeli's is just another in a long line of this country's outrages against others. It has been six years and no justice for Rachel. What the parents say is true. Israel cannot and will not investigate itself with any degree of objectivity or intensity. I hope the UN listens.
Dear Rachel Corrie's parents, Jumping in front of a military bulldozer in the midst of destroying smuggling tunnels in a war torn, terrorist invested area is no safe, and in fact can be quite lethal.
Just off the top....(1) She didn't "jump" in front of anything (2) The bulldozer was demolishing a HOUSE, not a TUNNEL (3) This was not a "war zone", but an area under IDF "belligerent occupation" (4) Even the IDF accepts there were no "terrorist investature" taking place when this bulldozer was doing its thing. Indeed, the only thing you got right was the statement that the area was unsafe.... but even then you were completely incorrect about *why* it was unsafe....
chaim ben kahan - stop your lies. the house wasfor a well respected palestinian dr. with no tunnels suspected or ound. The house was on theisraeli and not the eyetian side.
Rachel Corrie, and International Solidarity Movements ("ISM"), was killed mistakenly killed in 2003. I'm just curious why the Corrie family and ISM never called for an investigation when ISM member, Akram Ibrahim Abu Sba, was killed by Palestinian members of Islamic Jihad in Jenin Sept 6, 2007. For the same reason Hitler didn't investigate SS crimes against Jews in Nazi Germany. There's no difference between the ISM and the Nazis as far as their aims.
Max - the discription fits the israelis more than it does the palestinians. It is the palestinians who are the victims of israel brutality.
The IDF claim on the "legality" of its actions is here http://www.mag.idf.il/592-4071-en/patzar.aspx Two things stand out. (1): The IDF claims (correctly) that a blockade is legal during an "armed conflict", but it then defines that armed conflict as being.... operation Cast Lead! Logic therefore dictates that if Cast Lead is the "armed conflict" that legalizes the blockade then a continuation of that blockade AFTER Jan 2009 (i.e. when a ceasefire ended Cast Lead) must be illegal. (2): The IDF claims (incorrectly) that 67A of the Sanremo manual allows it to capture a ship that is "attempting to breach a blockade", when every quote it gives actually says that you can capture a ship that is "breaching a blockade". The quotes from the U.S Navy "Commander's Handbook" actually underline that point (and undercuts the IDF) because it explicitly states that "breaching a blockade" has a different definition to "attempting to breach a blockade". Section 67A of Sanremo refers to the former - not the latter - and so the IDF's argument must be false. Just thought you'd like to know, because I'd be pretty certain the IDF lawyers won't bring any of that to your attention
seem so out of place amongst the hysteria
"he IDF claims (correctly) that a blockade is legal during an "armed conflict"," Except, in your link, it says no such thing. It says a blockade is legal for purposes of self-defense, pitiful liar.
1 San Remo Manual does not apply to the conflict between Israel and the non-State entity of Gaza, which is ruled by the terror organisation Hamas. San Remo applies only to States, be they belligerents or neutrals. 2 a de facto ceasefire does not put an end to conflict. 3 Hamas is continually smuggling missiles and other war material, in violation of any cease fire claims. 4 Article 67 of San Remo applies only to merchant vessels, not to civiliian vessels; in addition, Article 67(a) states that merchant vessels may be attacked if they "are believed on reasonable grounds to carry contraband or breaking a blockade, and after prior warning , they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture. Since the Mavi Marma clearly refused to stop, and clearly resisted visit, search or capture, then under all circumastances, it lost its right not to be attacked.
2.There is much more to the San Remo agreement, than a one liner especially, not even quoted verbatim as you tend to do here repeatedly,giving your own inerpretation to laws in black and white. The Israeli army employs large numbers of lawyers to interpret the complexities of the law.I will wait for the open judicial enquiry,no disrespect to your legal qualifications,of course. Care to list them?
self serving partial quotes.!
using mommy's internet connection.
Please - no more amateurs pontificating about things they are not quallified to comment on. Are you a maritme lawyer?
You could show folk a thing or two I'll bet. Not sure what though.
I agree with the Corrie family that Israel can not be trusted to conduct a transparent investigation,. I refer to two investigations they did on the attack on the USS Liberty over 40 years ago. They got it so wrong that they could not even get the correct side of the ship they torpedoed that killed 26 of the 34 sailors that fateful morning. Israel is in the business of white washing anything they are guilty of.
WIKIPEDIA The Naval Court of Inquiry[18] (p. 23 ff, p. 111 ff) and National Security Agency official history,[19] concluded that the order to withdraw was not re-broadcast on the frequencies that the Liberty crew was monitoring for orders until 15:25 Zulu, hours after the attack, (although the orders were broadcast on the wrong frequncy eleven hours before the attack). This failure was attributed to a long series of administrative and communications problems. The Navy said a large volume of unrelated high-precedence traffic, including intelligence intercepts related to the conflict, was being handled at the time and it also faulted a shortage of qualified radio men as a contributing factor to the failure to send the withdrawal message to Liberty in time.[18](p. 111 ff) Ultimately, the destruction of the radio room on board the Liberty during the attack makes it impossible to confirm what orders the Liberty actually received
suffered a terrible tragedy. Losing a child is unimaginably painful, irrespective of the cause, but in the circumstances in which they lost their daughter it is unbearable. I'm terribly sorry for their loss and their pain and the horribly wasted life. But, I'm afraid, that their opinion about who can and who can't be trusted isn't exactly impartial or devoid of both self interest, including psychological self interest and selectivity. Those who have been given the task of investigating the flotilla incident have impeccable credentials and the Panel includes people of integrity that aren't part of Israel and who don't have the self interest that Israelis have. These are the observers on the Panel. This Panel can be far more trusted than any international panel and certainly Turkish panel that would look at Israel. Turkey has become another Islamic polity which can't be trusted with much!
The panel is not even allowed to talk to the soldiers who took part in the raid. The Israeli members are so close to death they could be buried any minute now. The international observers are widely thought to be very pro-Israel. I.e. given to be of the opinion that is so common in Israel: that any civilian deaths caused by the IDF are regretable, justified and were unavoidable. Plus they don't even get to vote. And this is what you think is far more trustworthy than *any* international panel? You sure don't set your standard very high.
Brad's gratuitous swipe at turkey as a Muslim country shows his own anti-Muslim prejudice. Sorry, but your opinion is not to be trusted.
Justice Jacob Turkel: ruled to allow Moshe Feiglin run for the Knesset. Moshe Feiglin was convicted of, publishing seditious materials, sedition, conducting illegal gatherings as leader Zo Artzeinu who held mass protests against transfering Judea and Samaria to the PLO http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Justice+Jacob+Turkel%22+%22Moshe+Feiglin%22
then indulge your hyperbole
What is the problem in a democratic country to hold protests against or in favor of transfering Judea to the PLO.That is the greatness of Israel,the democracy allowing each one to express his opinion.