Indirect peace talks to begin next week, Clinton says
U.S. Secretary of State: Ultimately we want to see Israel, PA in direct talks, working out all difficult issues.
By News Agencies Tags: Israel US Middle East peace Israel news PalestiniansU.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Friday she expected Israel and the Palestinians to begin indirect peace talks next week, breaking months of deadlock over a key U.S. foreign policy goal.
"We will be starting with proximity talks next week," Clinton told reporters, saying U.S. special Envoy George Mitchell would return to the Middle East next week to get the process under way.
Clinton said the United States expected an Arab foreign ministers meeting on Saturday to endorse the new talks, which would give Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas political cover to resume indirect negotiations that he pulled out of in March after Israel announced new settlement construction.
"Ultimately we want to see the parties in direct negotiations and working out all the difficult issues," Clinton said during a meeting with visiting Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammad al-Sabah.
"They've been close a few times before," Clinton said. "So we are looking to see the resumption of those discussions."
Israeli and Palestinian officials declined comment. One Abbas aide, Saeb Erekat, said his side would await the results of the Arab foreign ministers meeting on Saturday as well as of a Palestinian Liberation Organization executive committee next week.
Kuwait's Sabah said he was confident Arab states would back the initiative to get talks back on track. "We support fully the position that the United States has taken," he said.
Clinton's statement signaled that weeks of intense U.S. diplomacy were bearing fruit and both sides were again ready to relaunch the Mideast peace process through indirect "proximity" talks - in which U.S.mediators shuttle between negotiators.
"We've worked intensively in this. We've asked both sides to take actions," said State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley.
"I think there's an understanding that the proximity talks are valuable. I think there's a commitment to engage seriously in them and to begin to address the substantive issues at the heart of the search for peace," he said.
Mitchell, who held three days of talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders last week, was expected to travel again in coming days and would have meetings in the region toward the end of next week, Crowley said.
The Obama administration has been pushing hard for the two sides to resume negotiations stalled since the three-week Gaza war that began in December 2008, calling it a direct security concern to the United States.
Hopes that indirect talks would start in March were dashed when Israeli officials announced plans to build 1,600 new homes for Israeli settlers, ignoring U.S. and Palestinian objections.
Abbas had long insisted Israel freeze settlement building before the talks resume, and had rejected a temporary hiatus in construction ordered by Netanyahu last year as insufficient.
But Palestinian sources have said that Mitchell offered them an unwritten commitment to assign blame publicly to any party that takes actions which compromise the negotiations in exchange for coming back to the table.
An Arab League committee due to meet Saturday in Cairo is expected to once again support the indirect Israeli-Palestinian talks - a month after its last endorsement. That previous nod was rescinded over an Israeli plan to build housing in contested East Jerusalem.
Abbas needs Arab backing to ward off internal Palestinian criticism over entering into talks with a hardline Israeli government, without having first had his preconditions met, notably a full freeze of Israeli construction in both the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Clinton declined to discuss any specific U.S. offers to the Palestinians, but said that both sides recognized the importance the Obama administration placed on reaching a peace deal which eventually delivers independent states for both Israel and the Palestinians.
"We've been very clear in our efforts that the resumption of talks is absolutely essential for the progress we seek toward a two state solution," she said.
|
Clinton |
| Photo by: (AP) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
I hear words coming from a few but no actions that demonstrate a sincere commitment to a just peace. Most Israelis have become content with the status quo and the ability to periodically rant about the Palestinian threat.
So that take it or leave it deal in 2000 allows Israel to indirectly negotiate while still annexing more and the US can somehow blame "both sides" ! Why are mental midgets like you so against Hillary anyway she's doing exactly what AIPAC wants! Lets face it Israel does not want peace, Settlement building/land annexation cannot co-exist with peace! The charade will go on and on and on and on and you get to complain about meaningless/empty non existent scoldings to Israel.........PEACE EVER?
The settlement offered by the Israelis to the Palestinians in December, 2000 was flawed. It compelled the US administration, not totally a fair mediator, to submit a counter proposal. Arafat accepted the US proposal and Israel did not. One more related fact, The Palestinians offered to continue negotiations in Taba, the Israelis voted out Barak and walked away from the process. These are the facts that were distorted by the US and Israeli administrations to provide political cover for Barak who was fighting for his political future.
Seems Hillary Clinton loves to hear her voice or read her name in the news. There is a total waste of time and money in two different places. Indirect talks with the Palestinians or sanctions against Iran. Till there are direct talks between the Israelis and the Palestinians there is nothing to talk about. What do Condeleeza Rice and Hillary Clinton have in common ? Air Mile rewards with nothing to show diplomatically.
"Israel has proven it unable or unwilling whatever the case may be to achive any settelement of the conflict." You're not talking about the settlement offered to the Palestinians in December, 2000... are you? You know, the one where so many world leaders encouraged Arafat to take the offer, but he refused?
Where would you be without them.No other country would tolerate your crap.
Israel has proven it unable or unwilling whatever the case may be to achive any settelement of the conflict. Like Mubarak has said, Israel can negotiate a road block for 15 years; thats why you can come and claim Israel has been negotiating all those years, the facts are there is no results on the ground. It is time for the US as Israel benefactor to act responsibly and uses its power to force Israel into an agreement. Hivanta?
The US is involved because we were invited and because we provide aid to both sides and because nobody else is acceptable to both sides. Show your ability to achieve something towards peace on your own and if asked by both sides, the US will be happy to step out of the way. And when you stop trying to control our government, you may find a more amicable atmosphere.
"You must stop terrorism caused by the settlers" Enough is Enough!
we had direct talks with the palestinians for decades and with arafat being invited into ehud barak's home.now with the obama clinton gang interfering we have indirect talks.will the americans please get the hell out.
Well, they won?t be serving Olives during that talk. You must stop terrorism caused by the settlers
nothing will happen.