Former U.S. envoy to Israel: Washington will regret its settlement freeze bribe
In his op-ed in the Washington Post, Daniel Kurtzer blames Netanyahu for making Israel's security needs 'contingent and negotiable.'
By Haaretz Service Tags: Israel news U.S. Middle East peace settlement freeze Israel settlementsFormer U.S. ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer criticized Saturday a recent U.S. offer to provide Israel with a package of incentives in exchange for an additional 90-day freeze on West Bank settlement construction.
|
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meeting in New York, November 11, 2010. |
| Photo by: AP |
In an article published in the Washington Post, Kurtzer called the proposed deal a reward for Israel's bad behavior and said it was "a very bad idea."
"Washington will almost certainly come to regret bribing Israel, Israel may regret receiving such a bribe even more," Kurtzer wrote.
The proposed U.S. incentives package offered to Israel includes a U.S. undertaking not to request a further extension of the freeze following its expiration, and to veto any attempt by the Palestinians to win recognition by the United Nations of their state unilaterally.
The Obama administration would also ask Congress to approve the sale of 20 F-35 warplanes to Israel and, should there be a peace deal with the Palestinians, guarantee its wider security needs. These would supplement the 20 F-35 warplanes Israel already plans to buy using money from annual grants it receives from Washington.
"Previously, U.S. opposition to settlements resulted in penalties, not rewards, for continued construction. Washington deducted from its loan guarantees to Israel an amount equivalent, dollar for dollar, to the money that Israel spent in the occupied territories," said Kurtzer.
Kurtzer added that if the deal went through, it would create a dangerous precedent in U.S. foreign relations.
"It is not clear that Washington has thought through the implications. Will the United States similarly reward Palestinians for stopping their own bad behavior?"
Moreover, said Kurtzer, the agreement is problematic for Israel as well, and "by subjecting Israel's defense needs to the political demands of an American administration, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has done something quite dangerous for Israel - he has made those needs contingent, negotiable, optional."
"Israel's security requirements are now merely a bargaining chip with which to negotiate what Jerusalem will or will not do to advance the peace process."
Kurtzer said that Israel's "bargaining exercise" was "unseemly." However,
he added, the deal has not yet been signed and it was not too late to start over.
Netanyahu unveiled the U.S. inducements to his cabinet last weekend and appeared hopeful the ministers would back plans for a temporary halt to building in the West Bank to overcome a hurdle to the peace talks.
But an Israeli official said on Friday the United States had not yet provided the guarantees that Israel wanted, with Washington reluctant to commit to paper all the promises Netanyahu says he was offered verbally last week.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
For far too long domestic politics have forced the US to put Israel's interests above those of America. No matter what Israel does it will be rewarded with American tax dollars and sheltered by vetoes in the UN. Were it not for domestic politics, US lawmakers would state the obvious ie. each and every settlement is illegal under international law and instead of rewarding Israel there will be sanctions and a loss of aid. Do I expect this to happen? No. Domestic politics will trump wisdom and justice which in the end will be bad for Israel and bad for America.
Shame on the U S government and on the Israeli government its a bribe in the open ,as far as I am concerned is real will be the looser in the long run if it continues with its hard headed and one way policy toward the so called peace process eventually the useless Palestinian government will collapse and is real will have to deal and bare the responsibility for the 2 million Palestinians living under its reoccupation of the west bank and Gaza the Israeli public must play a better roll in the decision making policy of its government at the end its either the moderates or the radicals on both sides is real and the us and the Palestinians must decide.
What the US is doing towards Israel has only one name: appeasement. But again, it's all the US has been doing since 1967.
Any deal will be believed when seen in writing, has each and every condition explicitly spelled out, and is signed of by all those party to the negotiations.
We are not doing any favor to USA by agreeing to a condition for a chance to advance peace even for one millimeter. What is it? Is it a Middle Eastern Suk?
1 Both the US and the EU should halt all aid to both the Jews and the Palestinians. 2 Give Fatah and Hamas 90 days to come with unified proposals to a permanent peace. On the 91st day if they do not come with unified proposals then they should forget about a Palestinian state but a One State solution starts taking place. 3 If the Fatah and Hamas comes up with unified proposals then lock them in a big room together with the Israelis until they come out with a solution. In the meantime all aid should be on hold to all of them. 4 If they manage to agree, financial help should only be given for a specified period of time to be spent in accordance with the donors wishes. They'l have to learn to live together as other civilized nations do. 5 The money saved could be well used both in US and EU.
The only thing Netanyahu - and Israel - understands is force. If the USA and the World wants peace in the mideast they must impose crushing punishment upon Israel until it crawls back within the Green Line. As the world and especially the USA do not have the guts to stand up to Israel the ONLY thing left to do is admit that there will never be peace and start evacuating the Palestinians from Judea and Samaria.
it is all about it. Freeze is just a piggy back.
Israel's occupation and settlement enterprise has absolutely NOTHING to do with its "security", and Israel's using the peace initiative to scam the U.S. out of goodies is nothing more than that - a scam! And the unfortunate part is that all the U.S. is going to get for its good intentions is screwed! Amazing that it's apparently unable to see what is quite obvious to any observer - that Israel has NO intention of relinquishing its illegal occupations.
The recent poll of Palestinians throughout the territories shows 70% of them admit the "peace process" is only a step to a single unified Palestinian state in the whole of Israel/Palestine. Israel has more reason than ever to hold on to everything scrap of land it can get, for SURVIVAL.
The US has offered incredibly generous incentives for Israel to freeze settlements for an insufficiently short 3 months period (previously, only 2 months). Who was convinced to change his mind because of this offer? NOBODY. Of the Seven Wise Men group of ministers, B. Begin and Ya'alon are political idiots as well as ideologues, so the offer had no effect. Shas' Yishai is religiously motivated, and earthly (incl. airplanes) incentives count for nothing, and Lieberman of course was going to teach the US a "lesson". The two moderates, Barak and Meridor, would vote for continuing the freeze without any incentive at all. The one left is Netanyahu. But all Netanyahu needs (and will need), is enough to change the minds of his colleagues, not his own mind. (He follows pressure, not incentives). So these incentives are an exercise in futility and a waste of effort. What Obama needs to do is to "change his skin" and apply good old PRESSURE on Israel to act rationally. Learn from Jim Baker, dude.
Israel should freeze settlement construction (as it did earlier) for as long as it takes to agree with the Palestinians on the border in WB. (Jerusalem may be excluded at this stage.) The two sides will have an incentive to hurry up: The Palestinians, because they want their state, and Israel, because the settlers will be pushing to build. Once the border is known, the settlers can build in the area designated for Israel. There ought to have been no incentives for Israel to follow international law. It is a bad international precedent.
How bizarre, if not "unseemly" of Kurzer. First, he argues that the U.S. should go back to the stick rather than the carrot with Israel (deducting from the loan guarantees), and in the same breath says it will hurt Israel's security if it accepts the U.S. incentives package by making Israel's defense needs negotiable and subject to US political aims and so presumably Israel needs to stand on what's right for its security and not bow to the US. So I suppose Israel knuckling under to US deductions from loan guarantees avoid those issues, right? When will these guys--who failed so abjectly in their peace efforts the first time around--have the grace to just bow out quietly, get their sinecure in some "think tank" of no importance and confine their chatter to the D.C. cocktail circuit?
Ross also failed miserably. He was a too obvious Israeli cheerleader. More pro-Israeli than Israelis themselves. It is unbelievable he is still in.