Families of Gaza flotilla victims accuse Israel of war crimes in The Hague
Delegation representing 300 activists files complaint over Israel's raid on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla which left 9 activists dead.
By The Associated Press and Danna HarmanTurkish lawyers representing pro-Palestinian activists filed a complaint Thursday with the International Criminal Court in The Hague, accusing Israel of committing war crimes in May when its troops raided a boat trying to break Israel's blockade of Gaza.
It was unclear whether the prosecutor would agree to pursue the case or whether the court has jurisdiction. But the filing reignited an issue that has severely strained Israel's relations with Turkey, previously its strongest ally in the Muslim world, and keeps Israel on the defensive over its much-criticized Gaza blockade.
|
Pro-Palestinian Turks demonstrating against Israel in Ankara, Turkey on June 6, 2010 |
| Photo by: AP |
A delegation representing some 300 activists and a Turkish nongovernment organization submitted the complaint to the prosecutor's office in The Hague seeking an investigation into the May 31 raid.
Nine Turkish citizens, including 19-year-old Furkan Dogan who had dual U.S.-Turkish nationality, were killed during the melee after Israeli troops rappelled from helicopters onto the deck of the ship Mavi Marmara before dawn.
"I have confidence the international court and the prosecutor will take this case," said Ahmet Dogan, Furkan's father.
Israel has said its troops fired live ammunition only after they were attacked by activists with clubs and metal bars and they felt their lives were in danger.
Attorney Ugur Sevgili said the victims want Israel investigated for torture, inhuman treatment, the taking of hostages and other violations of the Geneva war crimes convention.
"We demanded from the prosecutor to initiate an investigation and prosecute the perpetrators of this crime," Sevgili said. We didn't mention any Israeli soldiers or any Israeli politicians. We just told them that we believe war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed."
The court, which began work in 2002 as the world's first permanent war crimes tribunal, receives hundreds of complaints every year, but so far has filed indictments against 17 war crimes suspects - all of them involved in African conflicts.
Dogan, speaking outside the court's headquarters, said he thought politics might get in the way of justice.
"I believe that people who killed my son will be prosecuted. However, this case also has international and political dimensions," he said.
A UN-appointed panel of human rights experts, chaired by a former judge of the international court, found last month that Israel violated human rights law during its interception of the flotilla carrying humanitarian supplies to Gaza, which has been under an Israeli blockade for three years.
Israel rejected the panel's findings, which it said were biased and one-sided, and said the UN Human Rights Council that appointed the panel is heavily weighted in the Palestinians' favor.
The court normally intercedes only if the country involved is among the 114 nations that have endorsed the court's founding treaty. Israeli is not a signatory, but the ship was flying the flag of the Comoros Island, which is a member of the court.
Sevgili said he expected the Comoros to support the victims' application to the court or file its own complaint.
The prosecutor also may initiate an investigation even if the accused country does not belong to the court - but only if he determines that the country is unable to launch its own credible investigation of human rights abuses.
Among the complaints submitted and presumably pending in the prosecutor's office is an application by the Palestinian Authority 18 months ago asking for a war crimes investigation into Israel's brief yet deadly 2008 war in Gaza.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
oh right, its about money not martyrdom anymore.
Tell them to go shopping in teh beautiful gazan malls. They will feel better then.
Near where I live in Connecticut are many beautiful malls, selling many beautiful things. Doesn't mean I have the money to buy them. Same with the Gazans...
Terrorists wanted to die as martyrs and died as martyrs,their families are proud they are martyrs yet they go to Hague complaining that they sons died as martyrs.Gee.What a complicated people..They achieved the martyrdom,are respected now and those left behind want tribunal to condemn Israel for killing them.Can martyrdom be achieved without being dead?
Israel refused to cooperate with an earlier HRC committee, the famed Goldstone committee. In the Goldstone case, the HRC has made a heroic effort to please Israel, appointing as head a Zionist Jew. What more can one expect? But still Israel refused to cooperate. There is reason to regret this non-cooperation because Israelis might end up in the Hague. The present committee on the "flotilla" was also shunned by Israel even though its members are not known to have an anti Israel bias. They issued a very damning report, including a legal analysis determining that the Gaza Blockade is illegal. It will be very difficult to beat. The IDF released a film showing its soldiers being attacked. Well, how much footage remained on the cutting floor and what did it show? The other side produced eyewitness testimonies. I would worry about the Hague's own conclusions.
The day the IDF killed those 9 Turkish very violent peace activists from the religion of peace that were lynching the soldiers, the Turkish army probably killed 90 Kurds.
to matching their previous genocide record of over 1 million Armenians
If Turkey killed 1 or 90 Kurds in violation of international law, then File a complaint with the court.
Maybe Israel and turkey are on the same level.
If you are weilding steel bars and knives, you can't call yourself "unarmed". There is no security force in the world that would not have opened fire on the goons of the Mavi Marmara.
Steel bars against commandos armed with fully automatic rifles?? Are you serious?? How about Mike Tyson vs. an infant?? Is he justified in beating the living ### out of it just for stepping into the ring with him?