• Published 09:14 04.07.10
  • Latest update 09:14 04.07.10

Egypt FM: Arab League will declare Palestinian state if peace talks fail

Top Palestinian negotiator Erekat refutes reports claiming that Abbas had offered Israel a West Bank land swap as part of a final status peace agreement.

By Haaretz Service Tags: Israel news Middle East peace Mahmoud Abbas Saeb Erekat

The Arab League will turn to the United Nations Security Council to declare an independent Palestinian state if peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians do not bear fruit by September, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit told the Egyptian daily al-Masry al-Youm on Saturday.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, May 9, 2010

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, May 9, 2010

Photo by: Reuters

According to the al-Masry al-Youm report, the Arab League decision was based on UNSC resolution 1515, which calls for regional Middle East peace, based on the two-state solution.

The Egyptian FM said in the interview that it was important to establish a Palestinian state at least in principle, while garnering international support for the main elements of a permanence peace deal with Israel.

Earlier, Abul Gheit, speaking to the London-based Arabic newspaper, Asharq Al-Awsat, criticized the United States for failing to advance the Middle East peace process and said that the conduct of Washington's envoy to the region, George Mitchell, would not bring about peace between Israelis and Palestinians even 10 years from now.

Saeb Erekat

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat

Photo by: Dan Keinan

Aboul Gheit said that Palestinian Authority President Abbas had delivered a series of written proposals to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, including concrete steps to reach final-status agreements on contentious issues such as borders and security arrangements.

On Sunday, chief PA negotiator Saeb Erekat claimed that Abbas did not offer Israel a possible West Bank land swap as part of a final status peace agreement, told Israel Radio on Sunday.

Erakat's comments contradict a report in the London-based Arabic newspaper Al Hayat, according to which Abbas proposed a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, with a possible land swap of 2.3 percent of the West Bank to ensure a fair solution for Israeli settlement blocs.

Erekat told Israel Radio that the PA president had not made such an offer, adding that the current US-brokered indirect talks were to remain secret.

Al Hayat reported over the weekend that the Palestinians agreed to leave settlement blocs including Gush Etzion, Pisgat Ze'ev and Modi'in Ilit, along with a swath of land overlooking Ben-Gurion International Airport, in Israeli hands.

In exchange, the PA would receive land of comparable size and quality in the southern West Bank as well as a corridor between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Abbas also reportedly proposed easing Palestinian demands over East Jerusalem to permit the Jewish Quarter of the Old City as well as the Western Wall to remain under Israeli sovereignty.

The remainder of the Old City, he proposed, would become the capital of a Palestinian state but fully open to the adherents of all faiths.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 45. 12 17
    Israel would never give up the west bank!
    • Bibo
    • 04.07.10
    • 22:44

    Israel know very much it is in a place it shouldn't be so peace in the ME is far far away from this ugly reality.... Israel also knows that stability in any Arab country is bad for Israel almost anything is bad for Israel in this region! Israel is surviving and won all the wars because the west want it to be this way.... on the other hand Israel is benefiting so who cares if the world leaders doesn't care about Palestine!

  • 44. 7 34
    Arab states have no clout, no respect in the world
    • sami abu ismail
    • 04.07.10
    • 22:05

    Israel, Egypt and probably others are conspiring in the seige of Gaza which amounts to a crime against humanity and a genocide. Egypt , Jordan, Syria and Lebanon are protecting the border of Palestine. Arabs have never been serious in confronting Israel. So, here is a bluff no one believes. Israel and its Western backers respect force and honesty and unfortunately Arab regimes have none of these.

  • 43. 18 4
    I hereby declare
    • H
    • 04.07.10
    • 21:51

    The Whole of the United Kingdom a State for the under four foot. Anyone seen above this height will be interrogated, imprisoned and shot. I asked G-d if this was OK and he said YES! I have it in writing.

  • 42. 32 42
    a new state
    • Eibik Schtern
    • 04.07.10
    • 20:15

    what is needed is a new form of state. For all that is good and pure left in this world, the new state of Judea Samaria should be created. This state will encompass all of Judea Samaria, empower democratic values for all legitimate citizens of that state. Judea Samaria will maintain close relations with Israel, including a military and ecnomic cooperation. Foreign workers living right now will be allowed to remain, earn a decent wage and may apply for citizenship after pledging allegiance and devotion to Judea Samaria. It would be a glorious state in which finally everyone will live in security without the constant threats of Terror and genocide perpetrated by Hamas and Fatah foreign terrorists. Such elements would be deported to their true homeland Jordan or if they choose so, to Gaza. Then the settlers and legal citizens would return to living in peace, send their children to school and praise the glorious foundations of a just and pure democratic state.

  • 41. 42 43
  • 40. 51 26
  • 39. 55 32
    PALESTINIAN NATION!!!
    • Daniel from Lima, Perú
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:45

    is there are a "palestinian nation" ????. exists a lybian nation, argelian nation, yemeni nation, united arab emirati nation??? can somebody explain me what is the difference between "palestinians" and muslim lebanese, syrians, jordans??? ALL ARE THE SAME, ALL SPEAK ARABIC. there is not a palestinian nation. before 1948 there were not a palestinian people, there were not jordanian people, syrian people nor nothing!. many says that palestine was the name of the region since romans. but even in ottoman empire had not a palestinian vilayet or something called palestine. all was part of SYRIA VILAYET. no palestinian people, nation, or region existed. ok, before 1948 there were not a state called ISRAEL, but existed a NATION CALLED THE JEWISH NATION... nobody is refusing the fact that in 1948 there were arabic speakers in the region known as palestine, but there were not a palestinian nation with a separate own history. that is a fairy tale created since 1948... so please stop saying that there were a palestinian nation living in that region since the man discovered the fire. I agree with 2 state solution, but please stop lying and saying that never existed a jewish presence in the holy land.

  • 38. 37 27
    PALESTINIAN NATION!!!
    • Daniel from Lima, Perú
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:25

    is there are a "palestinian nation" ????. exists a lybian nation, argelian nation, yemeni nation, united arab emirati nation??? can somebody explain me what is the difference between "palestinians" and muslim lebanese, syrians, jordans??? ALL ARE THE SAME, ALL SPEAK ARABIC. there is not a palestinian nation. before 1948 there were not a palestinian people, there were not jordanian people, syrian people nor nothing!. many says that palestine was the name of the region since romans. but even in ottoman empire had not a palestinian vilayet or something called palestine. all was part of SYRIA VILAYET. no palestinian people, nation, or region existed. ok, before 1948 there were not a state called ISRAEL, but existed a NATION CALLED THE JEWISH NATION... nobody is refusing the fact that in 1948 there were arabic speakers in the region known as palestine, but there were not a palestinian nation with a separate own history. that is a fairy tale created since 1948... so please stop saying that there were a palestinian nation living in that region since the man discovered the fire. I agree with 2 state solution, but please stop lying and saying that never existed a jewish presence in the holy land.

  • 37. 2 14
    10 years, 20 years who cares?
    • Joyce D.
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:19

    The US has never had a leader who ignores polls and political reality. The phoney theats directed against Turkey appeased the Lobby. Anyone who has spent even a few hours looking into the "Flotilla Debacle" know that. In the US the Republican Party is moving so far to the right with their teabaggers that what was seen a few months ago as the inevitable loss of seats by Democrats will most likely be offset by the scrutiny applied to what the Teabaggers say when forced to depart from prepared talking points. Regardless, unless Obama and the Democrats are desperate and willing to risk an all out gamble. Let's just accept a freeze and status quo for as long as we can appease the PA and Hamas with CASH.

    • 2 16
      Teabaggers
      • Gianni
      • 04.07.10
      • 22:55

      These people epitomize the Americans the Founding Fathers had in mind. They are surely all turning over in their graves seeing today's Socialist Obamaism. They got more "change" than they bargained for. Come November, the pendulum swings back. The teabaggers see things clearly, as opposed to the disease called Liberalism.

  • 36. 30 45
    Both nations are there to stay
    • Mohamed in Sweden
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:16

    Better you solve the problems in a decent way. No more wars - it is enough. Israel will never get rid of the Pals and the Pals will never get rid of the Israelis - better both sides starts from that point instead of dreaming of ethnical cleansing either way.

  • 35. 41 26
    The PA is unlikely to ever announce the state because...
    • New observer
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:10

    ...of all the "free money" the it gets. The palestinians are the largest and the longest group recepient of aid from the UN High Commission on Refugees. Neither Hamas nor PA wants to risk loosing this aid.

  • 34. 99 48
    You want Palestinians to compromise
    • James
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:03

    The Palestinians have lost 80% of their original lands, nearly 5 million of them live as refugees scattered in neighboring countries, and the remaining lands are barely enough to create a viable state. Yet you Israelis want them to further "compromise"? Do you want their first-born too? They have nothing left to give you.

  • 33. 51 44
    Are Palestinian/Arabs living in a Mirage ?
    • Oliver Stillwell
    • 04.07.10
    • 19:01

    After the 1948 war when they became the 'Homeless Arab Refugees... and then after the 1967 War when Israel recaptured all of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount itself, have they forgotten? To these Palestinian/Arabs, it is as though none of this ever happened because they speak of East Jerusalem still being in Arab hands when it is already sixty years over when 4/5 Great Combined Arab Forces were totally defeated and Israel RE-Conquered Jerusalem and the Temple Mount. Are these Arabs living in a Mirage ?

  • 32. 26 33
    The Arab leage will declare Palis as a state blah, blah, blah
    • ottomatik
    • 04.07.10
    • 18:44

    Who gives a crap, let the Arabs declare what ever and also lok after and feed their useless brothers.

  • 31. 23 36
    Things a' changing
    • Ghasfur tal-Bejt
    • 04.07.10
    • 18:36

    It is time for Israel and its leaders to accept the Saudi Plan. Things are changing in favour of the Palestinians. All they need is for Hamas to change its tactics. They will soon realize that peaceful moves are stronger than their thousands of rockets which practically causes no harm. May your God bless you.

  • 30. 2 16
    Fire Erekat
    • Sam
    • 04.07.10
    • 18:34

  • 29. 23 15
    Erdogan Obama
    • rosemerry
    • 04.07.10
    • 18:24

    So israel can call any action "selfdefense" but ships on international waters are not allowed to respond to armed attacks on their crew or passengers. A real investigation would not support such a travesty.

  • 28. 46 15
    No Obama Veto at UN
    • Minnesota
    • 04.07.10
    • 18:21

    The USA will recognize Palestine.

  • 27. 30 38
    Judging from the comments, folks are running scared.
    • reno
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:46

    The mere thought of peace at last is driving some to desperation. Most people knew the day would come. Israel thought it could just keep shining everyone on. Accept that your borders will be quite near the 67 borders and try to readjust your mindset.

  • 26. 43 10
    Question: Why didn't the Arab l;eague created a Palestinian State
    • Canadian Historian
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:42

    on WB and Gaza before 1967. At that time Israeli army was within 1967 borders"?

  • 25. 18 35
    According to Fayyad and Blair, a Palestinian state will be ready in 2011
    • Logios
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:24

    Mid-2011is when a Palestinian state could be declared. I expect that it will be if no real progress is made with Netanyahu (which is likely). This September is particularly inconvenient for Obama because of the congressional elections in November, which might cause the Obama administration to veto a Security Council Resolution on a Palestinian state. Next year will be ideal, as the Arabs will figure out. I imagine that the state will be declared in the 1967 borders, will be admitted to the UN, and the pressure on Israel to settle with it will increase dramatically.

    • 4 12
      borders of pals and israelis
      • Seppo
      • 04.07.10
      • 22:51

      UN has determined in resolution 242 that Israel cannot be forced to 1967 borders because they are not acceptable. No agreement between arabs and Israel can be obtained if arabs stick to the requirement of 1967 borders. Basic problem is that pals attacked against Israel and lost. Now arabs are requesting unconditional capitulation of Israel. It will not work. Obama is requesting 1967 borders, not UN. For Israel would be a lot easier to deal with UN than with Obama, who does not care even if Israel would be eliminated from the world.

  • 24. 17 38
    Odd that some folk believe Jordan, who declared Sovereign Independence from the non-state entity of Palestine in 1946, is still a part of Palestine.
    • CJ
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:23

    By their criteria, Israel is still a part of the non-state entity of Palestine, despite having declared Sovereign Independence from Palestine in 1948.

  • 23. 3 37
    Arab League
    • Joe
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:22

    The Arab League should stop this nonesense. It is time , given the realities on the gound , that the PA resign and be disolved , for the inhabitants of the land to strat demanding their political rights and freedoms. Either Israel has to leave those people alone by ending the occupation , or giving those people their rights and settle the issue of refugees. Declaring a state while the land is still under the grip of an occupation is silly don't you think.?....

  • 22. 76 11
    1967 "borders" are not borders
    • Stephen
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:14

    They're armistice lines. Israel specifically requested that the term border was not used to define them. Israel's borders are defined by UNGA Resolution 181 - the Partition Plan.

  • 21. 32 41
    Many Others Will Also
    • Vladek
    • 04.07.10
    • 17:03

    The world has grown impatient with Israel. The formerly perceived martyr is now perceived as the antagonist. Israel has the economic and military power to make a just peace with the Palestinians. However Israel's leaders are blinded by a zealotry which denies rationality. They continue to war on the Palestinians despite token opposition. Israel has become a people nation blinded to human rights for the sake of encouraging settler and religious zealots.

  • 20. 10 33
    THAT WOULD BE A PALESTINIAN SUICIDE NOTE
    • zionist forever
    • 04.07.10
    • 16:56

    Lets assume they declare statehood and that the UN goes along with it do they really think that Israel will suddenly close all settlements, give up Jerusalem or accept a right of return. `Going it alone will be suicide for the palestinian cause. They are going to anger even the moderate Israelis who support creating a palestinian state. Israel will just get tough and be less compromising. First thing that will happen is Israel will refuse to give this state any kind of land corridor so traveling between the 2 parts of the state will only be possible by flying Jordan - Gaza. Even if they build an airport in Judea & Samaria it will mean what could be a short drive through Israel will mean an expensive pre planned journey. Israel will revoke the work permits of every single palestinian putting thousands out of work, there will be no sharing of natural recources like water... Israel will take what it wants and use force to protect its water assets. Jerusalem will be physically fenced in so they wont even be able to enter Jerusalem from their state. Settlements will stay they will just be better guarded. This entire state will be a giant cage. It wont be viable long term even if its based on negotiations but if the arabs go it alone they are finished. Negotiations can't restart because any compromises on the part of the palestinian leadership will be seen as selling out the state. Israeli public will be angry and will support tough measures. Even Obama will have a hard time making any progress because negotiation would be near impossible. If they go to the UN to create this state if its the General Assembly it wont be legally binding and Israel can refuse to recognize this state has any right to exist. If its the Security Council the US will feel pressured to veto it and insist that the creation of any state must be through negotiations rather than unilateralism. As for the Arab League who are they, where is their legal authority. All thats going to change is that instead of a virtual state in disputed territory controled by Israel it will be a prison controlled by Israel. If the palestinians have any sense they will sit down and hold SERIOUS talks, not make uncompromising demands they will talk like adults as long as it takes till all the issues can be agreed on. The creation of any palestinian entity will be conditional on alot of very serious issues being agreed on by both sides and considering we are already half way through 2010 and we are not even talking yet.

  • 19. 36 36
    No state for Jewkillers
    • Build Israel
    • 04.07.10
    • 16:51

    If the Arabs hadn't showed their hatred and willingness kill Jews maybe things would be different. Today, Jews don't trust the Arabs at all. Not even a little bit. No trust / No peace!

  • 18. 9 14
    Considering that . . .
    • Zev Davis
    • 04.07.10
    • 16:47

    the way things happen in the world today is that the WTO, the World Bank, and International Cartels make most of the important decisions regarding peace and war, as the Arab League blusters. If, indeed, it is in the interest of the plutocrats of the world to establish a Palestinian Arab State, there will be one. It will be some kind of banana republic with rules that suit the bankers and the industrial firms that can use it to make as much money as they can, leaving all but "their Palestinian and Arab partners" to prosper in the Indpendent State of . . . Needless to say, there will be an Israeli or two who will discover a way to outsource more Israeli jobs increasing their profitability. Then too, why bother. Eventually the world will wise up and start using alternative sources of energy The fossil fuels of which the some Arab states have will become less essential, and . . . the Palestinian Arabs, like everybody else may have to wait for Messiah. At that point, whether there is or is not a Palestinian State becomes a moot point.

  • 17. 29 35
    Declaring a Palestinian State
    • Harold
    • 04.07.10
    • 15:50

    I predict the Arab League will declare a Palestinian State if peace talks fails. Europe will do the same and so the rest of the world If Obama does not press Israel within less than one year.

  • 16. 17 20
    Erekat's refutation
    • The Real Deal II
    • 04.07.10
    • 15:38

    What more would you expect from a chronic liar?

  • 15. 4 11
    Isnt' there a single Israel leader programmed like Sadat to say , every square inch
    • gee gee
    • 04.07.10
    • 15:36

    Isn't there a single Israel leader programmed like Sadat to say , every square inch?

  • 14. 41 36
    Great news, a Palestinian State in Jordan.
    • Stephen(Geneve)Switzerland
    • 04.07.10
    • 15:34

    Thats what is truly required. All the Palestinians in one great country, where they will be revered by the people of Jordan, in fact they will have their very own King and Queen, Imagine, living in Camelot, no fences,no settlers,no blockades, of course they will require special licenses for Grad and Kassam Rockets, not to mention no shooting after hours, no firing squads, no political Aid flotillas in Aqaba Port, terrorist activities will require a special permission coupled with a Jordanian Military chaperone. Unless the Arab League wishes to impose said State on Israeli sovereign territory , then Israel will have no option but to annex an Arab State. For the Arab League is the enemy of Israel since pre Independence of the Jewish State, they sent the millions of Arabs against a few hundred thousand Israels in 1948. So as we say in Hebrew, lech le azazel. Good day.

  • 13. 61 22
    • 11 14
    • 5 6
      Jordan is Palestine?!
      • Siba
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:46

      But that was grossly expanded by the British at the expense of Saudi Arabia by Churchill with what is desert anyway. The maps I've seen show maximum claims of the Zionists to include a narrow strip on the East Bank of the Jordan. The original Transjordan existed because it was on the Jordan River.

    • 8 5
      Anat, how old should a "historian" be?
      • Logios
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:58

      '"Palestine", historically, includes Jordan"' - Anat Since when did "Palestine" include Jordan? Not before 1920 when the remains of the Ottoman Empire were divided in San Remo. And in 1922 Churcill already interpreted the Mandate for Palestine to separate "Trans-Jordan" and give it to the Hashemites. So "historically", "Palestine" included trans-Jordan for a very short time, much shorter than the time it Jordan was not included. Another question for our historian: What part of Jordan is Eretz Israel (where the 12 tribes dewelled)? Not a great part. AMon (where Amman is located) and Moab (on the eastern shore of the Dead Sea) were not part of Eretz Yisrael, so we are talking about the Jordan Valley east of the river. Now figure how big that was and do your "calculation" based on reality and not blind ideology.

    • 2 2
      Jordan was part of the British Palestine mandate for less than five years
      • Sam
      • 04.07.10
      • 18:37

      It's also a big sand dune with no agriculture or water sources. Britain created it to protect their oil pipelines running from Persia and Iraq to the Haifa oil refinery. I recommend reading any histories by Benny Morris, David Fromkin, Martin Gilbert or Ephriam Karsh on the matter.

    • 2 6
      historical Palestine
      • yuval
      • 04.07.10
      • 19:18

      it is so easy to just spew old slogans. There is no need to even check if they have any factual truth. "Historic Palestine" does NOT include the East Bank (Jordan). The East Bank, as Trans-Jordan was NOT originally part of the British Mandate in Palestine. Years later, and simply as a matter of conveniance of governance was the territory of Jordan added to the existing goverment mechanisim.

  • 12. 17 51
    Please don't declare a palestinian state.
    • C2 Sydney
    • 04.07.10
    • 14:34

    The proposed state is not logically viable.unless the name of the proposed state is Fatahstan.

    • 8 13
      CJ for once your right no arab state will ever be viable long term
      • zionist forever
      • 04.07.10
      • 18:39

      For once it seems your right. Its never going to be viable ( 22% of mandate Palestine 5800km ), a growing population a shortage of recources like water, it has no real economy or assets. Israel will always be top dog. They are not even united on what they want .. some will accept 22% of mandate Palestine others want the lot. Going it alone in 2011 is just suicide for their cause because Israel will make life hell for them, fence off Jerusalem so they can't reach it from their state, revoke the work permits of thousands of palestinians, refuse any kind of road corridor through Israel so they can get between both parts of their state unless the fly so going from Gaza - their capital in Ramallah will be a big and expensive event they need to plan days in advance and its a journey many won't even have the money to take. Long term this state is never going to be truly viable and if they go it alone Israel will make life hell for the palestinians out of anger.

  • 11. 46 42
    Pal State
    • BenAzzai
    • 04.07.10
    • 14:28

    Perhaps there should be a Pal state in Sinai in Egypt.

    • 20 11
      States declared
      • azbob
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:44

      I seem to remember that Israelisi were pleased whern the UN GAVE them a state! Why, then, are they all up in arms about the "rats" and "roaches" whoi might be given the same. Maybe Israelis really think they can get all of Palestine, along with other delusions.

    • 25 18
    • 13 2
      Sinai?
      • Joe
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:25

      So what is the difference between your suggestion of throwing the Palestinians in the" desert" and those who claim to throw the Jews in the sea? Both wrong.... because they both lead to perpetual conflict.

    • 6 0
      Palestinian state in Egypt
      • Siba
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:41

      But that land isn't theirs.

    • 12 3
    • 8 10
      Azbob, there was a war after the partition, do you know of it?!
      • Mike
      • 04.07.10
      • 20:06

      That's why Israel is all up in arms. Jeez.

    • 5 14
      Andrew
      • zionist forever
      • 04.07.10
      • 20:36

      The ideal solution from the start would have been rather than a palestinian state they are all given Jordanian citizenship. No oslo but the international community gives Jordan a huge pay off in exchange they agree to accept the palestinians. Israel annexes Judea & Samaria legally. Although they would not have a right to buy property just anywhere they want and neither they or their decendents would have Israeli citizenship and they are not entitled to permits to work in Israel they could continue to live in their homes with a permanent residency visa and can only be evicted for certain serious crimes. They have the option to go live in any part of Jordan and if they want to leave their current homes if they own their property the Israeli government would be obligated to buy them out. Jordan has a developed economy, a stable leadership, alot of land and has a peace treaty with Israel. If we had a situation like that from the start instead of oslo it would have created the ideal solution and very few people would have had their lives directly affected arab or jewish and it would have also given the arabs the option of moving to Jordan ( better than 5800km ). Israel would have kept the land, no issues over Jerusalem, no refugee, no settlement problems. The oslo formula has brought nothing but misery to all sides.

  • 10. 36 28
    UN partition plan should be negotiation base
    • John
    • 04.07.10
    • 14:25

    Everything more Israel gets should be compensated to the rest of the Palestinians.

  • 9. 65 51
    Isn't enough for Israel that Palestinians accept them over 78% of the land?
    • Khader
    • 04.07.10
    • 12:13

    Negotiations are over, decisions are needed. The Arab Peace Initiative is on the table and a future of peace based on two-states is possible. Unfortunately, it seems that Israeli leaders are working very hard to achieve a one state solution.

  • 8. 106 41
    Accept 2.4% of Sudetenland? - Never!
    • r cummings
    • 04.07.10
    • 11:42

    2.4% is a fair offer. It would transfer 150,000 settlers to Israel overnight. Given that Israel has no legal land rights beyond its original 1948 borders, getting the additional land up to and over the Green Line is an unusually good deal. Netanyahu and the right will never take it of course. They claim they want 10% of Palestine, but the truth is they want it all, to complete their biblical, nationalist and racist expansion to the East, via theft, coercion, force and trickery. There is not another country in the world that would be allowed to carry out ethnically-based occupation land theft like this without international sanctions and military force being applied. It really is a sad comment on the USA's slavish support for this most un-American of nations.

    • 24 12
      "this most un-American of nations"
      • George V
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:43

      This is possibly the most accurate description of Israel that I have ever read. The tides are finally changing in the US, people of all identities are waking up to what Israel is doing, sadly overdue but hopefully not too late. Average Americans wont want to be associated with Israel once they fully see the path it is heading down.

    • 10 11
      Trail Of Tears
      • Tal
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:18

      There is a long history of nations redefining what is an acceptable population through forced removal. The Trail Of Tears is just one that comes to mind. Another example is the expulsion of ethnic Germans throughout eastern Europe following WW II. You live in a fantasy world to think that Israel's national needs are not just as legitimate as every other nation's.

    • 8 11
      Ethnic cleansing!
      • Avi
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:19

      "It would transfer 150,000 settlers to Israel overnight" That's a heinous crime. Unless it's an agreed solution of transfer of a minority in Israel as-well, in the spirit of avoiding bloodshed.

    • 9 22
      Un-American Nation
      • Gianni
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:21

      Under Obama's *Change*, America has become an Un-American Nation. The USA knows who to support, and it surely isn't the Islamo-liars who constantly terrorize throughout the World. Is that what you side with, Cummings??

    • 7 7
      You'd be right... But
      • Yoinkel
      • 04.07.10
      • 19:02

      It is firstly unclear thatsuch an offer was made. If it was, Netanyahu would be the first pm to miss a viable offer for peace from the palestinians. His leadership is painfully anemic and self centered

  • 7. 66 53
    Abba-abbas dabba do !
    • Josiah Jacob Ben David
    • 04.07.10
    • 11:01

    Abbas must think he is a magician. Next , if we watch his dog and pony show he will pull a Palestinian rabbit of his hat or somewhere else. This man is nothing but an old clown but no one is laughing with him. They are laughing at him for the poor deluded fool he is. He cannot even set foot in Gaza without Hamas' permission yet he calls himself a PM? He wouldn't have had that title if he hadn't high tailed it from Gaza to hide out on the West Bank and seek Israel's protection !

  • 6. 42 17
    Erekat Keeping Negotiations Secret
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 04.07.10
    • 10:59

    Somebody leaked something to a paper, Erekat tries to keep stuff secret. Next time some Israeli leaks something and Netanyahu or Lieberman deny it. That is how the game is being played for now. If Netanyahu made a borders offer, his gov would fall. Hence the need for secrecy.

  • 5. 42 2
  • 4. 46 79
    should've known better than to believe Palestinians would compromise on anything
    • McQueen
    • 04.07.10
    • 10:31

    They never have and evidently they never will

    • 30 17
      You are abosutely right, however!
      • ahmad
      • 04.07.10
      • 11:35

      ..from totally different reasons, contrary, the land of Palestine, all of it, is ours and the Zionists are invadors. Hence, Not Abbas, nor Erekat nor , to that, all the PLO leadership can or has the right to give up one inch of our lands to the Zionists colonists. having that said, and whereas there can be n oreverse to prior the time of unjust & unfiar Balfore declaration, I propose on the colonists to accept a one state solution to solve this issue based on constitutional sharing of the power. No gimmics or "plans" of partitioning Palestine will ever result in any peace. McQeen, you are 100% right, we will not compromise. take it from me

    • 41 41
      Jordan is Palestine
      • nadav
      • 04.07.10
      • 14:51

      there is no such thing as palestine or palestinians. the british already gave what belongs to the Jewish state to Jordan in 1922 and now the arabs want more- too bad, go to Jordan!

    • 15 4
      nadav---there you go again--Jordan signed an agreement with Israel
      • labhras
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:23

      You should read the Washington Declarations and educate yourself. While you are at it , read the actual agreement. It refers to Palestinians and not in the context of Jordan taking in 4 million of them. Au Contraire--it specifically states that neither side is allowed to take measures that may significantly change the demographics of the other side. I belive they were referring to mass movement of populations. Go read it. It can be embarrassing if you venture outside your "den" and engage with real live folks who happen to recognise spin and hasbara when they hear it.

    • 11 1
    • 10 5
      Strange Under the British Mandate even Jewish folk were PALESTINIANS>
      • CJ
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:33

      On May 14th 1948, Israel declared Sovereign Independence from the non-state entity of Palestine. What remains of the non-state of Palestine is still called Palestine. Jordan, which also declared Sovereign Independence from the non-state entity of Palestine in 1946 is also not apart of the non-state entity of Palestine.

    • 6 14
      Ahmad
      • Gianni
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:26

      I have to hand it to you, at least you are honest, not like you liar brethren. It is no problem, Ahmad, keep eating sand, you will get nothing. And if you attack and terrorize, Israel will blow your people away. You act like pit bulls

    • 8 2
      No Palestine?
      • Joe
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:28

      Nadav , and I bet you are one of the vocals that insist that the Arabs recognize Israel???

    • 1 9
      Nadav
      • Siba
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:38

      Then how do you justify allowing the abomination of Jordan to exist when it is the land of Israel?

    • 9 3
      Nadav, you go back to europe
      • Joseph
      • 04.07.10
      • 19:04

      how about that. all Israelis whose parents were not born in the lands of Palestine must leave.

    • 8 11
      YOU are wrong.
      • Debbie Ayalon
      • 04.07.10
      • 19:29

      PALESTINE is Jewish, the former Province of JUDAH renamed by the Romans 2000 years ago as 'Palestine', wherein Jesus a Jew was born in his hometown of Bethlehem. . BTW. where were the 'Palestinians' when Jesus a Jew was being crucified by the Romans in Calvary outside of Jerusalem? These Arabs are not mentioned in either the Bible, the Gospels or the Testaments. Where were the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians. then? Please answer.

    • 2 6
      what's in a name?
      • e l pratt
      • 04.07.10
      • 21:16

      That's because the Brits have based their empire on the Roman empire. The Brits used the Roman name for the are of Judea, Samaria, Lake Kinnerett, Jordan, etc. What's the matter with you people? Don't you ever read anything but your own posts? Try reading a little history for a change. That way you will know what you are condeming yourself to do again and again and again. Like you even care!

    • 0 0
  • 3. 29 65
    The West Bank is not Abbas' to offer
    • Fish
    • 04.07.10
    • 10:21

    It's very ungenerous not to offer something that is not yours. Besides, what "land swap"? Israel will give the west bank in exchange for WHAT land?

    • 52 14
    • 27 3
      Fish, it is about time to leave the aquarium
      • meir gush etzion
      • 04.07.10
      • 11:55

      Either silly naivete or warped sense of values makes keeps you locked up in the pleasant aquarium you inhabit. The land is G~d's not yours..not theirs...He put us hear to lead moral lives..not to be possessive. Abraham knew that in order to maintain some semblance of norlmal existence he had to give Lot the offer to choose part of the land G-d promised him. Secular Nationalism and Religious fervor breed sacrilege. Even though my area is "agreed upon" by M. Abbas, I have alwasy prepared myself for the possibility that am here temporaritly. As it ssays in Levitiicus: We are strangers in the land.

    • 41 21
      West Bank
      • Froy
      • 04.07.10
      • 12:43

      Check your facts, fishy, the West Bank is occupied by Israel, but it has never pertained to it, not even according to Israel. That is occupied Palestinian land and it is only up to the Palestinians to give up or swap. Israel can give anything it wants behind the Green Line.

    • 6 17
      West Bank...Alias: Judea and Samaria
      • mtlonewolf
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:57

      "Check your facts, fishy? What planet have you been living on there Froy boy? I think you'd be the one who needs to check your facts. FYI...the West Bank, as it is called was known as Judea and Samaria from our scriptures a few thousand years ago. Uhhh...that would be Jewish land, not Arabic lands. Ownership confirmed, point goes to Israel.

    • 13 3
      To mtlonewolf [...if Haaretz lets me post this ?]
      • Mohamed in Sweden
      • 04.07.10
      • 20:05

      Hey -You too check the scriptures - the land was NOT SOLELY given to the Tribe of Juda, it was given to ALL 12 ISRAELITE TRIBES - and presentday Pals are to 85 or 95 % of Israelite origin. Jews and Pals have to face these evolving facts and the science pertaining to it !

  • 2. 54 80
    West Bank was Jordan
    • Cony
    • 04.07.10
    • 10:13

    The 1967 border was between Israel and Jordan . Today any settlement regarding the borders should be between Israel and Jordan . Who ever lived in the West Bank before the 1967 war lived under the Jordanian rule the Palestinians are Jordanian.

  • 1. 53 104
    Nothing To Swap: It's ALL Israel's Land
    • Yishai Kohen
    • 04.07.10
    • 09:28

    Jordan is "Palestine"- or nothing is.

    • 85 43
      uh, no.
      • no
      • 04.07.10
      • 10:18

      israel's land is all land within 1967 borders. the rest of its "land" is based on fairy tales from the bible and not international law. period.

    • 36 12
      Odd. Jordan became independent of the non-state entity of Palestine 1946, same as Israel was declared independent of the non-state entity of Palestine in 1948
      • CJ
      • 04.07.10
      • 10:42

      What remains of the non-state entity of Palestine is defined by the SOVEREIGN BOUNDARIES of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Israel.

    • 53 29
      Armistice line is not "border"
      • Fish
      • 04.07.10
      • 10:42

      Learn the facts before you hit the keyboard.

    • 23 30
      really?
      • Danny
      • 04.07.10
      • 11:09

      If by fairy tales you mean the mandate system that set up the borders for the Jewish state, along with those of Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, then yes maybe we should also reconsider those countries existing. Read a book.

    • 43 34
      with two differences
      • ahmad
      • 04.07.10
      • 12:27

      those countires did not exist on the ruins of another people demisem such Israel did. one more thing, those nations are homegrown/indiginous, unlike the Eueopean Jewish imports. go it?

    • 18 51
      True and Certain It Is
      • Shmuel
      • 04.07.10
      • 12:33

      They should thank us for letting them stay there. The Arabs are foreign invaders, and do not belong in the Holy Land at all.

    • 18 8
    • 61 36
      Yishai Kohen, YeShA, Israel,---in occupied Palestine
      • labhras
      • 04.07.10
      • 12:49

      You are an illegal settler and teach your children to hate and murder Palestinians on their own lands. Your days are numbered fella---even most Israelis are tired financing you layabout religious fanatics. Go back to noo yoirk.

    • 26 4
    • 22 32
      teaching hate
      • nadav
      • 04.07.10
      • 14:55

      funny, the only ones i see on the news teaching hate are the arabs and the Muslims! open a text book anywhere in the arab world and you'll see horrible hate speech against Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, atheists, gay people, women and of course the Jews. the only ones teaching hate are the Arabs and Muslims!

    • 16 25
      internaional law 3000 years ago?
      • uh, yes
      • 04.07.10
      • 15:05

      Don't make me laugh. Do you think there was a UN? Do you think the Romans cared??? You are really pathetic if you think this way. The Torah. For sure the Pals didn't exist. Neither did the Muslims.

    • 24 15
      Israel ends at the 1947 Partition Plan Line
      • Johnboy
      • 04.07.10
      • 15:52

      Everything beyond that line was **never** allocated to Israel by **anyone** i.e. everything beyond the 1947 partition plan lines was siezed by Israel at the point of a gun. It isn't possible to annex territory by force of arms, and so the legal borders of "Israel" - even today - ends at the partition plan lines. Abbas is offering to recognize Israel on the 1967 Green Line, and that is an offer of astonishing generousity BY THE PALESTINIANS, and it is a mind-boggling display of naked greed by Israel that is insists on more, more, more, more.

    • 22 12
      nadav---you are confused---Israel declared a State in 1948
      • labhras
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:12

      and did so on the borders based on the 1947 partition plan. Nothing to do with cease fire lines. In any event the war did not start until after Israel declared the State. As to teaching hate, might I suggest you google "Hate being taught in the yishuvas". Or how anout checking the video on U-tube depicting young Jewish girls writing "Love messages " on bombs on their way to kill Lebanses children. You apologists suffer from self imposed myopia and it,s killing you. Better wake up.

    • 8 12
      ahmad
      • Arnold- Canada
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:16

      When you get a brain and realize that the Hebrews were the indiginous people of Israel or if you prefer Palestine...then we can discuss. Till then you continue to be unaware of reality.

    • 23 11
      Teaching hate
      • John
      • 04.07.10
      • 16:59

      I sugest you read"Murder In The Name Of God"by two Israelis.It exposes the hate taught by the extremists,terrorists,ulta orthodox jews and their own terrorist who murdered Rabin.

    • 4 25
      uh, yeah! Not fairy tales.
      • mtlonewolf
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:01

      Where have you been living all your life, eh? History is very accurate. All of the land belongs to Israel, not one inch to anyone else, even though there are troubled inhabitants that have continually been present...read that as Arabs. Ownership goes to Israel and only Israel, no one else, and for no other reason than because God said so. You want land? Go back to Jordan and take it from the Hashemites. That's enough...case closed, class dismissed.

    • 9 24
      No "Palestine", It's name is "Israel".
      • mtlonewolf
      • 04.07.10
      • 17:05

      You got your facts twisted up. Palestinians are the squatters, Israel owns it all...hook, line, sinker...every square inch of it...and then some. If you want a nation, you've already got one. It's called Jordan, go back and take it from the Hashemites. That's your home.

    • 14 2
      "Truth"
      • pooh
      • 04.07.10
      • 18:59

      It's your kind of distorted thinking that is taking Israel, I am sorry to say, to an early grave.

    • 13 1
      hate
      • eran
      • 04.07.10
      • 19:02

      Teaching formally, yes. Teaching through through behavior-explicit or implicit-- and household remarks that convey negative attitudes towards other people--I see it every day amongst Jews here in Israel. Sorry Nadav.

    • 14 1
      correct borders
      • yuval
      • 04.07.10
      • 19:09

      Nadav is correct. Nadav is VERY correct. The borders of israel are NOT the 1949 armistice lines. The borders of israel are those that israel itself setforth in it's Declaration of Independence (May 14th, 1948. There, in isreal's own hand we find the only legal borders of isreal. It is those borders specifically declared AND recognized by the rest of the worl that are the only true, legitimate, legal and recognized borders. Oh, and by the way, to save you the trouble of reading that declaration, it states that the borders are those as prescribed by the UN. Without Jerusalem (corpus separatum) and without Jaffa or the Negev.

    • 14 2
      'A danger to himself and others'
      • Maggie
      • 04.07.10
      • 20:38

      What are you going to do in a court of law, when the day comes for you to be kicked out? Plead insanity - and state God gave you the land? The only thing you'll get free is a straitjacket.

    • 3 11
      Israel ends at the 1947 Partition Plan Line
      • reader
      • 04.07.10
      • 21:03

      Johnboy, This this would be true if Israel had started the wars and got the land by force of arms But , we (as well as you) know started the wars... Therefore the illegality of the post 47 Israel is not rellevant. The 1967 conquered (Here, you may say siezed by Israel at the point of a gun) territories problem is different. If you understand the first point, you might understand the second.