• Published 19:33 29.05.10
  • Latest update 19:33 29.05.10

East Jerusalem eviction orders threaten new embarrassment for Netanyahu

As PM heads to Washington to expunge memories of row with U.S. over Jewish building in the capital, settlers' push to oust Palestinians from Sheikh Jarrah risks reigniting tensions.

By Nir Hasson Tags: Israel news East Jerusalem Sheikh Jarrah

 

Settlers evict Palestinians from their home in Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, December 1, 2009

Settlers evict Palestinians from their home in Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, December 1, 2009.

Photo by: AP

As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu heads to Washington in a much-feted effort to restore damaged ties with the United States, new tensions in East Jerusalem threaten to rekindle a diplomatic row over Jewish building beyond the Green Line in the city.

On Saturday lawyers served eviction notices to two Palestinian families in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood, a focus of clashes between Arab residents and settlers.

The families were ordered to vacate their properties within 45 days.

Netanyahu will meet U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday in what observers predict will be extremely cordial circumstances – a marked contrast with the Israeli leader's previous visit to the White House in March, when he was denied a joint photo-call with his American counterpart.

Then, Washington's frosty hospitality was part of the fallout from a diplomatic spat that erupted after Israel angered its close ally with the announcement during a visit by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden of plans to build 1,500 Jewish homes in Ramat Shlomo neighborhood of East Jerusalem. Israel has since soothed Washington's ire by promising not to repeat the debacle.

Saturday's eviction orders, unlike the Ramat Shlomo announcement, did not come directly from the government. But while the latest incident may not on the same scale of the last,  it may well cause Netanyahu discomfort as he seeks to assure Obama of his commitment to recently restarted peace talks with the Palestinians.

"The danger is that whether intentionally or in error, the government is aiding the transfer of assets to extremist settlers who want to create provocations in Jerusalem and frustrate any possibility of a two-state solution [two the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," Hagit Ofran of the Peace Now movement told Haaretz.

Saturday's notices threatened owners of the two properties with legal action and fines.

"Failure to comply [with the order] will force my client to act against you with all means available according to the law [...] in such a way as may cause distress, anxiety and large and unnecessary expense," the notices said.

The lawyer who served the order, Anat Paz of law firm Eitan Gabay, informed the families they would be liable to a fine of NIS 350 for each day the remained in their homes beyond the eviction deadline.

Each family was also ordered to pay  NIS 12,000 per year for each of the last seven years. The notices did not reveal names of the claimants to the properties.

On Friday, recipients of the eviction notices approached left-wing activists demonstrating in Sheikh Jarrah to ask for help in fighting the orders.

"I was born in that house," said Karim Siyam, 37, who shares one of the disputed properties, a tiny two-bedroom home, with his mother, wife and two children.

"Since we received the letter we've been terrified. We're scared that any day they'll come and throw us out. In the end that's what will happen. It all depends on who the judge is."

The second house to receive a notice is home to the Kanabi family – parents, four children and their grandmother.

Over the past few months, the eastern part Sheikh Jarrah has been the center of a high-profile battle between settlers and three Palestinian families over 28 disputed houses. But Saturday's notices were for houses in the western half of the neighborhood, marking a broadening of the battleground.

Some eight months ago, Bayit Ehad, a charity organization run by settlers, took over a single house in western Sheikh Jarrah, were it has since carried out improvement work. The latest notices were for adjoining properties either side of that house.

All three houses are believed to have been in Jewish hands before fighting during Israel's independence war in 1948. After the war, the east of the city fell into Jordanian hands.

When Israel conquered East Jerusalem in 1967, the house passed to control of the Custodian General, a government official. They were later purchased by Irwin Moskovitz, an American businessman and a patron of the settler movement.


 

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 16. 109 4
    are you serious?!
    • oy
    • 29.05.10
    • 22:28

    "Each family was also ordered to pay NIS 12,000 per year for each of the last seven years. The notices did not reveal names of the claimants to the properties." how is this legal? i do not get it at all. these people have lived there for so long, and the settlers kick them out because.... jews lived there 2,000 years ago?! and then force them into poverty for doing nothing but LIVE IN THEIR HOUSES FOR THE PAST 7 YEARS? what the f***, man, no wonder why they hate us.

  • 15. 18 3
    Ties
    • Ties
    • 29.05.10
    • 22:26

    Part of the city also lies in the Palestinian territories. Ties

  • 14. 26 0
    My quess settlers bought the house 50 years ago
    • Adam
    • 29.05.10
    • 22:08

    from a British coloney. and every one wonder why we hate occupation.

  • 13. 6 58
    Where are all the Leftists with their call for "the rule of law"?
    • Binyamin Dissen
    • 29.05.10
    • 21:57

    Is the rule of law impotent when it applies to arabs that have stolen the homes of Jews?

  • 12. 34 26
    Netanyahu, Prime Mover, or Impotent Poseur?
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 29.05.10
    • 21:27

    Is Netanyahu Prime Minister or an impotent poseur? Was this action intended to humiliate him or Obama? Is he aboard for this action, or is he simply too weak to stop it?

  • 11. 21 4
    Find these people who are being evicted and give them a home
    • Karoon Rankoo Lamb
    • 29.05.10
    • 21:24

    Have my team find these people and give them a home each for their families. The problem is with many families once asked to move the house itself is hard to say goodbye to plus the neighborhood. Friends and a house may be all they have to their name such as a pack of clothes as well. That is held sacred to them as a wife or husband. Stability. Not destroying their homes. Karoon Rankoo Lamb 1st

  • 10. 65 5
    At least they get 45 days..
    • Adam
    • 29.05.10
    • 21:22

    in 1948, Palestinians had 5 minutes to grab there belongings. Are these people even compensated in this beautiful democracy?

  • 9. 46 5
    Can I get my west Jerusalem properties back ?
    • Charlie
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:48

    I have two buildings in west Jerusalem that was taken away , we want to be RE-SETTLERS ! A fair two-state or a fair one-state : CHOOSE

  • 8. 40 0
    In the end works fail.
    • arieh zimmerman
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:41

    Is there anything more indicative of the small minded pettiness of this action than that the names of the supposed (absentee) landlord does not appear on the eviction notice.

  • 7. 72 3
    Bad precedent
    • John
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:34

    What about Palestinians homes in pre '48 Israel? Many Palestinians have deeds from ottoman times. Can they now go back and kick out Jews?

  • 6. 18 0
    Again...?
    • Ronen
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:29

  • 5. 76 4
    The settlers rule not Netanyahu
    • alan
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:11

    Netanyahu has NO overall control. The settler experiment is OUT of control. Israel is ON the road to disaster. Getting worse by the day on ALL fronts. Israel likes it this way and NOBODY will convince them otherwise. What a bunch of losers.

  • 4. 0 65
    not in reality
    • danny
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:09

    Not in reality, would this embarrass Netenyahu or risk any confrontation with the U.S. The city is simply carrying out eviction orders against Arab citizens as they would aginst Jewish citizens. Should they ignore the law simply because Obama wants to hang out with Benjamin? And how would enforcing it bring about any kind of embarrassment?

  • 3. 20 13
    Why worry about two Palestinian families when hundreds of thousands of ISRAELI Arabs suffer similarly?
    • Logios
    • 29.05.10
    • 20:07

    The term "present absentees" (i.e. people who are present in the country but nevertheless are called 'absentees') refers to ARAB residents of 1948 Palestine who were present in the country but not residing at their homes during the 1948 War of Independence. Such people today are citizens of Israel but their "abandoned" property was taken from them and they cannot get it back. Mostly they left their homes temporarily because of the war-situation, but this was a tragic "mistake" on their part. This law applies only to Arabs but not to Jewish Israelis. (Israeli basic laws do not impose legal equality between the groups.) Once Jerusalem was annexed, the prevailing law became the Israeli law rather than the Jordanian law. Jordanian law must have recognized the ownership of the local residents residing in abandoned Jewish homes even if it was not written in the books. (such a "chazaka" is recognized in Talmudic law). In any case, there is a vast number of "present absentees" in Israel proper.Why cry over a few Arab families in Sheikh Jarrach?

  • 2. 60 1
    Pre-1948 war?
    • j
    • 29.05.10
    • 19:59

    What precedent does this set for Arab refugees who have deeds and keys for their properties in Israel?

  • 1. 85 2
    another double standard
    • shelley
    • 29.05.10
    • 19:55

    So, if Israel keeps all the formerly Arab houses on its side of the green line, and then wants to keep all the formerly Jewish houses in Arab Jerusalem, how can the law square this circle? Either you keep what you won or lost, or you don't. Can the settlers have it both ways? Will the precedent come back to bite? Or will Israel just add another blot to its reputation for justice?

    • 32 2
      Re-settlers
      • David
      • 29.05.10
      • 22:12

      Great new term and very fitting. I hope some savy human rights lawyer takes up the case of the Jewish "settlers" in formerly Arab houses in West Jerusalem. This one-sided so-called justice needs some public attention !