• Published 21:16 08.06.10
  • Latest update 21:16 08.06.10

Britain: No quid pro quo deal on Gaza blockade

Britain denies report in the Daily Telegraph that in exchange for decreased world pressure for an international probe into Gaza flotilla events, Israel is expected to ease the Gaza siege.

By Natasha Mozgovaya and Barak Ravid Tags: Gaza flotilla Benjamin Netanyahu

Pro-Palestinian protesters denounce Israel's raid of the Gaza flotilla

Pro-Palestinian protesters denounce Israel's raid of the Gaza flotilla, in India on June 2, 2010

Photo by: Reuters

Britain has denied a report in The Daily Telegraph of a British plan wherein Israel will ease the Gaza siege in exchange for decreased world pressure for an international probe into the events of the Gaza flotilla, the British Embassy in Tel Aviv said in a statement on Wednesday.

 

"We don't know where the idea of a quid pro quo came from… the Foreign Secretary has made clear that the current restrictions on Gaza must be lifted in line with UNSCR 1860," the statement read.

 

"In this context, we are of course giving some thought to how this might be done, and discussing with our partners, including Israel.  Other partners are doing the same, and we hope that all such discussions will lead to rapid progress on this issue," the statement continued.

 

 

The Daily Telegraph reported on Tuesday that Israel is expected to agree to a British proposal in which it will ease the Gaza blockade in exchange for international acceptance of Israel's internal investigation into the events that led up to the deaths of nine Turkish activists aboard a Gaza-bound flotilla last week.

 

According to the report in the conservative British daily, Britain has taken upon itself a central role in mediating the crisis that has erupted following the Gaza flotilla events and has drawn up a confidential document proposing ways of easing the blockade on Gaza.

 

Israeli officials said that in light of growing international criticism over Gaza's humanitarian situation, they would agree to permit a substantial amount of aid to pass through Israel's land crossing into the Gaza Strip, the paper reported.

 

According to the Telegraph, Israeli officials denied any direct link between their readiness to cooperate over the blockade and the decrease in international support for the UN-led proposal for an international probe. However a Western source involved in the discussions with Israel said that there are talks of a mutually beneficial deal.

"A quid pro quo deal is in the offing," said the Western source.

 

Moreover, British Foreign Secretary William Hague also hinted that pressure for a UN investigation was easing after he said that a probe with simply international presence may also be acceptable.  

 

U.S.: International probe into Gaza flotilla raid is 'essential'

Echoing countless calls on Israel to subject itself to an international investigation of the events that led up to the deaths of nine Turkish activists aboard a Gaza-bound aid ship last week, the U.S. on Tuesday demanded that some international body be involved in the probe of the events.

This, after a senior official said earlier Tuesday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nearly completed a draft of guidelines for the establishment of a commission of inquiry comprised of Israeli jurists.

The future commission would investigate the clash between Israeli navy commandos who were rappelled onto a Turkish ship, participating in a flotilla attempting to break Israel's three-year blockade on the Gaza Strip and deliver aid, and Turkish activists aboard the ship.

The incident sparked harsh criticism against Israel and international calls for an independent investigation. Israel has so far rejected any external investigation, insisting that any investigation by an external body would be biased against Israel.

"International participation in investigating these matters will be important to the credibility that everybody wants to see," said U.S. State Department spokesman Philip Crowley on Tuesday. "We are discussing with Israel and others the prospective nature of international participation in the investigation. And we're sharing different ideas on how to best accomplish that."

"We want to see an impartial, credible, prompt, thorough investigation. We recognize that international participation, which lends itself to countries and entities being able to vouch for the results of the investigation - will be an essential element to putting this tragedy behind us," he went on to say.

Meanwhile Tuesday, Netanyahu demanded that he and his forum of seven senior ministers be allowed to testify before the investigation committee that will be established, comprised of Israeli jurists, and said that he and his top ministers would supply any future committee with all the required information.

In drafting the guidelines for the future investigation, Netanyahu insisted that Israel Defense Forces soldiers will not be personally interrogated, and asked that the investigation committee use instead the findings of internal military investigations already conducted. Netanyahu added that IDF Chief of Staff would testify.

According to the senior official, the guidelines for the panel of investigation have been almost finalized by the forum of seven during a meeting they held Monday morning. However, the forum is expected to convene an additional meeting on the topic on Wednesday. The draft of the guidelines has been approved unanimously by the forum ministers, who supported Netanyahu's demands.

The Prime Minister's Bureau has neither made the draft public nor the names of the individuals who will serve on the committee. The reason, according to the official, is the fact that the cabinet has yet to complete coordinating the investigation with the U.S. administration and other Western countries in order to ensure their support. The aim, he said, is that these countries will send observers to oversee the investigation. In addition, the official added, conflicts of interest must be examined in regard to the possible members of the investigation panel.

The Prime Minister's Bureau approached several top litigators to inquire whether they would be interested in taking part in the work of the committee. Several of the candidates are former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Meir Rosen, former legal adviser to Israel's Foreign Ministry Alan Baker, and Bar-Ilan University professor Yaffa Zilbershatz, who is also a candidate to become Israel's next ambassador to the United Nations.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 16. 186 6
    The accused investigates himself
    • Baz
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:35

    I think everyone accused of crimes would envy Israel. It can get away with investigating itself. Wow.

  • 15. 149 7
    what does israel fear?
    • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:34

    International participation in investigating these matters will be important to the credibility that everybody wants to see

  • 14. 123 9
    crazy
    • an unexpected move from US
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:33

    Israel illogical and irrational violence disturbed US..justice for the 9 civilians,justice for all human being.good move!

  • 13. 157 10
    Subject of investigation cannot dictate the terms
    • Esther
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:29

    A credible investigation requires that the person (country) being investigated not dictate what the terms of the investigation should be or who sits on the panel.

  • 12. 159 8
    Investigation
    • Chet
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:20

    Bibi is just showing his ingnorance on how stupid he thinks the world is. Sorry but it sounds more like you are covering up. Are guilty? You make sound as if you are.

  • 11. 22 169
    Obama's mandate is a "joke"
    • da vid
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:16

    Turkish activists can attack Israel and then Israel investigation?

  • 10. 155 7
    You know your in trouble when
    • akon
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:09

    you can't expect a single other country in the world to perform an inquiry regarding your military action impartially or in a favorable light.

  • 9. 77 5
    You know your in trouble when
    • akon
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:09

    you can't expect a single other country in the world to perform an inquiry regarding your military action impartially or in a favorable light.

  • 8. 19 165
    gaza flotilla
    • ernst
    • 08.06.10
    • 23:07

    if the people are short of supplies , where does all their ammunition come from?

  • 7. 98 7
    Investigation
    • Erwin
    • 08.06.10
    • 22:19

    Bibi, if you run a democratic country, do not pick your friends to investigate you. Israel does not luck international recongnized judges.

  • 6. 330 31
    Niet an yahu can testify under oath as a defendant
    • labhras
    • 08.06.10
    • 22:14

    Only victims get to do Victim impact statements. Israel is no longer the Victim. Hasn,t been for a long time.

  • 5. 311 22
    The accused defining the parameters of the investigation
    • not amused
    • 08.06.10
    • 22:02

    What a joke.

  • 4. 261 17
    Who will be part of committee without power?
    • Tisson
    • 08.06.10
    • 21:58

    What ist the idea of a committee that is not allowed to do his own invastigation. Nobody in the world will trust in an Probe, that is prepared by the israeli army and the Netanyahu administration.

  • 3. 291 20
    Flotilla enquiry
    • Rachel
    • 08.06.10
    • 21:41

    So the enquiry panel are not allowed to talk to any of the soldiers who took part? And all the flotilla activists have been deported. So who are they going to get information from? Oh yes, the internal enquiry which has already taken place. Do the Israelis have something to hide maybe?

  • 2. 167 9
    Sounds like a strictly legal state inquiry, not good enough
    • Logios
    • 08.06.10
    • 21:33

    Israel should want to know more than what the law is: 1. What intelligence was there about the passengers and cargo? 2. What options were there for accomplishing the Israeli goals? 3. How and why was it decided that the helicopter raid method should be used? 4. Were the troops trained well for the mission, including awareness of possible civilian responses? 5. What actually happened. 6. Were the military action and Gaza "siege" legal. The commission of legal experts will only answer the last two questions (assuming they could accept the hearsay testimony of IDF investigators instead of the commandos themselves) which the "world" is most interested in, but will not be able to answer the first four, which have to do with the competence of the political level that decided on the military raid. Israel must find the answers to these questions if it wants such a clumsy operation not to be repeated, but this may hurt the politicians and they are trying to divert the public's attention. Incidentally, all the legal questions were probably raised already before the fact with the attorney general and he must have approved the "siege" and the operation from a legal point of view. Here, the political level is already protected by his opinion, so no problem for them in such a commission.

  • 1. 308 20
    Welcome to Bibi-Farce
    • Kanaan
    • 08.06.10
    • 21:29

    Why not interrogate the IDF soldiers? What r u hiding, Bibi?