• Published 02:36 23.07.10
  • Latest update 02:36 23.07.10

Aid for Gaza must be delivered by established land routes, UN says

Israel's UN envoy and defense minister urge Lebanon and the international community to prevent two aid ships from sailing to Gaza from a Lebanese port.

By Haaretz Service, Barak Ravid and The Associated Press Tags: Israel news Gaza flotilla Ehud Barak UN Gabriela Shalev Lebanon

The United Nations said Friday that aid destined for the Gaza Strip should be delivered by land, after Israel said it would prevent a Lebanese Gaza-bound aid flotilla from breaking the sea blockade on the Palestinian enclave.

Martin Nesirky, spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

Martin Nesirky, spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

Photo by: United Nations

"There are established routes for supplies to enter by land. That is the way aid should be delivered to the people of Gaza," United Nations spokesman for the Secretary-General Martin Nesirky said in a press conference.

"Our stated preference has been and remains that aid should be delivered by established routes, particularly at a sensitive time in indirect proximity talks between Palestinians and Israelis," Nesirky added.

Israel urged Lebanon and the international community to prevent two ships from sailing to Gaza from a Lebanese port, warning that efforts to break the blockade of the Hamas-ruled Palestinian territory would be stopped.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak issued a statement on Friday saying that the Lebanese Gaza-bound aid ships were an "unnecessary provocation" like other flotillas heading toward the blockaded coastal city.

"We hold the Lebanese government responsible for preventing the flotilla from departing today, and if it does depart it will be accompanied by Israel's Navy to the Ashdod port," he said, adding that "if the ship refuses to be accompanied to Ashdod we will have no choice but to apprehend it in open waters."

Earlier, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Gabriela Shalev, accused organizers of the aid ships Junia and Julia of "seeking to incite a confrontation and raise tensions in our region."

A deadly Israeli commando raid on a Turkish ship trying to bring aid to Gaza on May 31 killed nine activists and focused international attention on Israel's blockade of Gaza, imposed after the Islamist militant and anti-Israel Hamas violently overran the Palestinian territory in June 2007.

In letters to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the Security Council obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, Shalev said, "Israel reserves its right under international law to use all necessary means to prevent these ships from violating the ... naval blockade."

She called on Lebanon's government to "demonstrate responsibility and prevent the two ships, Junia and Julia, from departing."

Lebanese Gaza-bound aid ship 'Julia' awaiting green light to set sail.

Lebanese Gaza-bound aid ship 'Julia' awaiting green light to set sail.

Photo by: AP

"Israel and Lebanon remain in a state of hostility," Shalev said, "and such action will prevent any escalation."

"Israel further calls upon the international community to exercise its influence in order to prevent these boats from departing and to discourage their nationals from taking part in such action," she said.

Shalev said it can't be ruled out that the Junia and Julia are carrying weapons or individuals with provocative and confrontational intentions.

Under the old blockade rules, only basic food and medicine were allowed into
Gaza. In a first step after the flotilla raid, Israel decided to let in most consumer goods but said Gazans would continue to be banned from travel and exporting goods for the time being.

Egypt also decided to ease its closure of Gaza after the flotilla raid, opening its borders to restricted travel and limited humanitarian convoys. The move restored a link to the outside world for at least some of Gaza's 1.5 million Palestinians.

Shalev highlighted that "all goods that are not weapons or material for war-like purposes are now entering the Gaza Strip through appropriate mechanisms that ensure their delivery as well as their civilian nature."

She said the organizers of the Junia and Julia are "aware of these channels to deliver aid to Gaza but similar to previous attempts by others are seeking confrontation."

In the latest challenge to the blockade, a Libyan aid ship blocked by Israeli missile ships from steaming to Gaza arrived in the Egyptian port of el-Arish on July 14. Its cargo was to be unloaded and handed over to the Red Crescent to deliver to Gaza.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 124. 0 0
    The solution to this problem is very simple.
    • 25.07.10
    • 08:02

    Elisha did it once. When the Syrians came after him, he took them to the King of Israel and instead of killing them, he set a feast for them. The Lord also said, if your enemy is hungry, feed him.

  • 123. 0 0
    Hamastan fires missiles maintining the period of armed conflict
    • PETER SM
    • 25.07.10
    • 00:06

    the legal blockade continues, "no peace ever",their choice

  • 122. 0 0
    Turkey did it all the work to change Europe's mood
    • Israeli
    • 24.07.10
    • 12:26

    This is not for sudden love to Israel. It is for continuing the easy European life. They threw Erdogan out of the front door, and he is knocking the doorbell again. This time he brought a new friend: Ahmedinajad. This is too much for Europe. Bashing Israel in pleasant, but having Islamic fundamentalism as your neighbor is too much. Now they realize Egypt may also collapse in the future, and Islamic fundamentalism is suddenly so much closer.

  • 121. 0 0
    Not by Air mail?
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 24.07.10
    • 10:22

    I want everything delivered to me by super models, but I, I like Hamas cannot have it all.

  • 120. 0 0
    Sad Affirmation
    • Mark from Florida
    • 24.07.10
    • 10:07

    I say screw Hamas, but that in no way makes Isreal's suffocating blockade legitimate. UN has tossed its morals aside and sided with Israel's blockade which, through duration and coverage, has become a real monument affronts to human rights. How about we say US aid to Israel must be delivered through an eyedropper.

  • 119. 0 0
    keep sending ships
    • will
    • 24.07.10
    • 09:25

    keep the flotillas coming even if they don't break the siege. Two per month! Then we will see israel really lose its cool...

  • 118. 0 0
    Gaza Blockade
    • Frank
    • 24.07.10
    • 07:51

    To all of you who thinks that Gaza is poor and desolate, you couldn't be more wrong if you try. Gaza is well stocked with everything that it needs. They even get their electricity and water from Israel at no cost to them. With that electricity the terrorist are making more and more rockets to shoot at Israel. Not only does Israel send in truck loads of supplies daily to Gaza but recently a Luxuary shopping Mall has opened in Gaza City. If they are so poor what is the need for a shopping mall. People who believe that Israel is the bad guy here is playing right into the PA's hands. The PA knows how to play the media and in turn people believe their out and out LIES.

    • 0 0
      Freedom and self determination are more precious than bread and water!!!
      • Montasser
      • 24.07.10
      • 09:56

      Suppose that palestinian people have every thing they need. However be sure that we are ready to live at the most minimum needs for life , if we get red for ever of israeli oppression and occupation. Freedom and self determination are our (and may be your) greatest hope.

    • 0 0
      Frank... From me to you frankly!
      • Richard Thomas
      • 24.07.10
      • 14:45

      Ever since Ariel Sharon decided to cede Gaza resulted not only great hardships to the settlers who were encouraged to live there by successive Govt,,and after 40 years developed a vibrant society with all the infrastructures that helped the Palestinians who worked side by side with the settlers,with no problems at all.Once the barbaric Hams took over,they destroyed all the structures,the HOT HOUSES donated for them. What did they do? Instead of benefiting from all of it,they turned the place into qassams launching pad.While the 8000 settlers to this day are still without real homes,children traumatized,divorces ...and dire circumstances. Great job by Sharon wasn't it? I call it SHARON'S FOLLY. To the present:Hamas and Gazans are neither straving,nor are they short of the wherewithal.The world gives then monies and they spend it on weapons...their asking for CEMENT it is not for buildings,to improve further their way of life,but to build more tunnels to capture IDF soldiers,as they did with Gilad (who by the way)was on the Israeli side and there was no fighting at the time. The flotillas are not coming to help.bu more hindering any process toward Hamas to change its stance ridding themselves of their charter,recognize Israel's sovereignty,not presume the whole country belongs to them,and become normal.There are among Gazans who are sick of the pressure put upon them with its fundemental strictures,but dare not raise their voice for fear.Let the flotillas come,it will not change the reality on the ground unless Hamas changes.The blockade is not going to be lifted by the say so of the corrupt UN,or any other one. It behooves some people to think before judging when they visit Israeli websites as armchair ignorant warriors..Makes me laugh on reading some who have never set foot in Israel,or anywhere in the ME not counting BAHRAIN etc.

  • 117. 0 0
    no no poster 96...hamas is the architect of this mess
    • judah ben hur
    • 24.07.10
    • 07:26

    anything or anyone that aims to hurt jews is ok by these "concerned human rights activists" here on haaretz...its so funny...what transparent jew hate...supporting a vile group like hamas is reprehensible. anyhow, aid is delivered via land routes...its not an issue and the people of gaza are NOT destitute. If they live below western standards, that is of their own doing....no one else. Israel gave back gaza in 2005, and look how gaza has fared since then versus the west bank... why? because hamas runs gaza, lobs rockets at israel, pour what money they get from suckers like you into arms rather than food...they use kids as human shields...etc..etc...and the pathetic jew haters on here STILL support hamas DESPITE overwhelming evidence that it is THEY who created their own mess. Gotta love the jews haters though....they are soooo sad that in fact, they are LAUGHABLE! :-)

  • 116. 0 0
    Israel is a strong and sovereign nation
    • vieirag
    • 24.07.10
    • 06:17

    Don't rely in the UN, EU, US. Israel must defend its citizens from its enemies. There are many Christians that are supporting you with prayers. Stay strong. God is with you. He is your protecter. Shalom!

  • 115. 0 0
    GREAT SONG- DON'T MISS IT
    • Steve of Mevaserret Zion
    • 24.07.10
    • 04:55

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaGHUZ-8DWw

  • 114. 0 0
    They didn't publish that letter
    • Music
    • 24.07.10
    • 04:38

    it was published in the "fan photos" section by one of their fans. He is not in the band.

  • 113. 0 0
    more ships to Gaza
    • Melinda Huntley
    • 24.07.10
    • 04:14

    Those people on the boats are very brave and I hope so much that they stay safe. Politicians lack courage to make the humanitarian changes but just look at what ordinary human beings can do.

    • 0 0
      Melinda Wonders never seize
      • Chafeeka
      • 24.07.10
      • 09:33

      Im so glad I stumbled on your post its like you are so starry eyed full of admiration for those "human beings" on those adventurous boats smelly without showering for days and you admire them.. besides you also admire the scum of the earth who is unemployed and yearn for publicity to be noticed thats how far these scumbags will go to get it even supporting Hamas there ya go still starry eyed?

  • 112. 0 0
    Nuns
    • ted heath NZ
    • 24.07.10
    • 02:32

    Is the IDF going to arrest and handcuff Christian nuns when they board the ship?

  • 111. 0 0
    blockade of gaza
    • mike
    • 24.07.10
    • 02:02

    the blockade is legal, warnings have been issued, when the ships are sunk there shouldn't be any cry babies

    • 0 0
      KISS.
      • koala bear and friends
      • 24.07.10
      • 03:51

      So that's your solution-sink the ships.The rest of the world would never have thought of that.So smart so simple, so TYPICAL.

    • 0 0
      lotilla is a continuation of opening up Gaza by other means
      • Siddhartha
      • 24.07.10
      • 04:27

      You do not get the point. "Should not" is conditional. Everyone is that the flotilla is merely a continuation of the policy of opening up Gaza by other means. Sinking the ship is not relevant. What is relevant is the political effect it causes to pave the way to open up Gaza.

  • 110. 0 0
    So who is the oppressor?
    • Hamish
    • 24.07.10
    • 00:11

    It is time Israel realized that they have been controlling exactly what goes into Gaza, and allow these basic goods to go through after an official inspection. The whole world knows that Israel is acting the tough guy with muscles, who looks more and more like the neighborhood bully.

  • 109. 0 0
    This time take pictures of the supplies
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 24.07.10
    • 00:08

    Israel, some advice. Inventory the goods in front of the press. Make sure the video camera's are rolling. You need expose this sad farce and PR game by the anti-Israel crowd. You have the right to self defense and blocking the sea routes to Gaza is fine and not illegal. The U.S. did it to Russia during the Cuban missile crisis and here in the U.S. most people support you.

    • 0 0
      False Analogy
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 24.07.10
      • 08:55

      The Cuban Missile Crisis lasted less than a month and the blockade was even shorter. The risk to the US was existential. We were building fallout shelters. The USSR had put nukes in Cuba in response to the US putting nukes in Turkey. The Gaza siege is 5 years old and counting. There is no existential threat to Israel, except from its own politicians. You need to read some real history on the issue of Cuba. You obviously did not experience it.

  • 108. 0 0
    #62 Excellent points -
    • world Observer
    • 24.07.10
    • 00:04

    Your are correct on all accounts. Western Governments, even Obama, realizes what is happening. It is in Israeli's best interest to rid themselves of any responsibily of pals. oddly enough Israeli-Palestinians on the whole prefer to remain in Israel once the Pals havae their own State.

  • 107. 0 0
    UN= un-fair..... money buys UN!
    • Tarek
    • 23.07.10
    • 23:11

    When world politicians fail to uphold the Geneva Convention, and they have failed with Gaza, then world civilians have right to enact the convention by delivering the rights of the civilians in Gaza. Geneva Conventions are not optional, they are obligatory for all to uphold.

  • 106. 0 0
    un and isreal can kiss my A$$
    • tarek
    • 23.07.10
    • 23:09

    The collective punishment of the entire population of the Gaza Strip is both illegal and immoral. I hope the ships sail ahead. This blockade and collective punushment of the Gaza Strip has become a well deserves hasbara disaster for Israel. About time.

  • 105. 0 0
    UN is Unfare
    • Australian
    • 23.07.10
    • 23:01

    Why hasn't the UN investigated North Korea for its role in the sinking of the South Korean Navy vessel that killed more than 40 south Korean sailers?

  • 104. 0 0
    World MUST support these acts of non-violent resistance
    • binny
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:24

    Everyone who has opposed Palestinian violent resistance such as rockets and terrorism, and have called upon Palestinians to use non-violent forms of resistance must loudly and vocally support these aid ships. Non-violent resistance such as this boat of Nuns MUST now be recognized and rewarded by the world for all these calls for non-violent resistance to have any meaning.

  • 103. 0 0
    Avoiding These "Provocations"
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:11

    This weekend, all crossings and all transfers of goods to Gaza are closed. Nothing is getting in, not even a single grain of rice. Hence everything is prohibited, not just weapons and dual use items. Israel could implement its much publicized, but never implemented list of prohibited items and open the crossings to everything else all the time in unlimited quantities. That would be keeping a promise given to the EU and USA. If people around the world SAW Israel keeping that promise, the flotillas would fade away. Too much to ask for, though. An Israeli politician keeping his word.

  • 102. 0 0
    the lebanese ship will be stopped and the naval blockade will continue
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:05

    despite the inane posts, despite the attempts to break the blockade on the hostile territory of gaza, despite attempts by the unhrc, despite the hostility of many democracies, including lately of the us, to the state of israel, the lebanese ship will be stopped and the naval blockade will continue.

  • 101. 0 0
    "Activists" roof and table - who pays ? Please, help to understand.
    • 17
    • 23.07.10
    • 20:04

    It is kind of profession today - they "protest" warming, G 20, etc. They do not work - or they are gainfully employed to protest?

  • 100. 0 0
    Lose-Lose For Israel
    • Sephardi
    • 23.07.10
    • 19:55

    Israel just doesn't have the financial resources -- despite the foreign taxpayer donations -- diplomatic support and manpower to continue to manage these flotillas, particularly if larger ones were to set sail -- and as a combination of those three elements, cannot rely on military means. It would be another big and counter-productive mistake to encroach future vessels in international waters. Provocation or not, so far the flotilla organizers are winning spectacularly, make no mistake.

  • 99. 0 0
    flotilla
    • sunny silver
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:31

    the un should collect all the humanitarian aid and give to the palestinians,in order to reduse there financial burden on them .perhaps those charitys that support terrorist should pay special taxes to countrys that are spending so much money for there security from terrorist this is all so burden on the eu un us canada . and so on .p.s after spt 11 ,the paletininan in Gasa thy were all over celebrating and giving candy on the street ?? i wounder if those same charitys .are sendig frotills to afghanistan .pakistan .p,s they dont have to break bocaked.any how we should ignore turkey .or the name of flottila from our headline .thy dont deserve our attention .it is clear to all that no ships will go trough the blocacked.

  • 98. 0 0
    Israel shouldn't ask the world,or anybody>
    • James T. USA
    • 23.07.10
    • 18:28

    Israel is quite capable to deal with any flotila that decides on another silly adventure.Besides since it will be comig from a HOSTILE nation such as Lebanon who follows Hizballah is tantamount to asking for WAR.Therein is difference The IHH flotilla was encouraged by Turkey and we saw the resulting circumstances that occurred with the 9 THUGS aboard. This one will be totally a non strater,for it will cause more mayham resulting in a worse scenario. Only FOOLS AND HORSES would go on such wild west type of an OFFENSIVE that Isrel will retaliate with EXTREME force will fight with all its might.Just wait and see..

  • 97. 0 0
    how deep is the water?
    • pacifist
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:42

    get close and the boat probably sinks

  • 96. 57 0
    Israel is the architect of this mess
    • Stephen Murray
    • 23.07.10
    • 17:00

    The collective punishment of the entire population of the Gaza Strip is both illegal and immoral. I hope the ships sail ahead. This blockade and collective punushment of the Gaza Strip has become a well deserves hasbara disaster for Israel. About time.

  • 95. 49 0
    The issue is one of control and who is the boss
    • Joe
    • 23.07.10
    • 16:19

    Israel can achieve the goal on No weapons to Gaza by having the ships searched by other trusted entities. The Flotilla , I am sure would not object to such an inspection. The issue of the blockade is not a sovreignity issue for Israel since the boats had been stopped in International waters . The intent of maintaing the blockade goes beyond the issue of Israel's declared intentions of stopping weapon smuggling , but to tell the "world" that Israel is the boss and nobody will be allowed to interfere with that . The hidden agenda is to punish Gaza and Gazans. That is obviously clear...If not , why insisting on docking at Ashdod . Why not let the ships be inspected ( by someone mutualy agreed upon) and then , let to sail to Gaza?

  • 94. 67 0
    EVERY TIME A SHIP IS STOPPED
    • JOHN PETERS
    • 23.07.10
    • 16:13

    Every time a ship is stopped, it advances the GAZA CAUSE and reminds the world how ruthless and a criminal state ISRAEL has become. The International Community is now behind the GAZA cause as a consequence. It is beyond any doubt that the Israeli leaders and its people cannot think outside the square to comprehend this aspect of their violation.It has become a lunatic state , with their national motto, being denial, denial, denial . GIDEON LEVY'S comments even before the Flotilla attack pointed out this point. While, the leaders of ISRAEL and its people continue on this naivity and unable to see through the HOUR GLASS, Israel is doomed everytime it attacks an AID SHIP. BY NOT SHOWING ANY COMMITTMENT TO PEACE, TOGETHER WITH THE REFUSAL TO UNLOCK THE NAVAL BLOCKADE WILL MEAN THE END OF ISRAEL ON THE FACE OF INTERNATIONAL AS HAVING ANY CREDIBILITY. I feel saddened for those humanitarian Israelis caught within this country with its dangerous leaders whos incompetence is now threatening peace with the possibility of war in the region.

    • 0 0
      Sink it
      • EVERY TIME A SHIP VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL LAWS
      • 23.07.10
      • 22:06

      Every time a ship violates international laws, it needs to be stopped and investigated throughly!!!!! Next time is might be worse, so i wouldn't count on it.

  • 93. 60 0
    civilians have right to uphold Geneva Conventions
    • Law
    • 23.07.10
    • 15:57

    When world politicians fail to uphold the Geneva Convention, and they have failed with Gaza, then world civilians have right to enact the convention by delivering the rights of the civilians in Gaza. Geneva Conventions are not optional, they are obligatory for all to uphold.

    • 0 0
      So let them uphold it by releasing Shalit
      • Boruch
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:10

      And of course let them uphold it in Kurdistan, Sudan and other places wheer Muslims continue masacra of minorities.

    • 0 0
      Law
      • Michael
      • 24.07.10
      • 00:15

      Would you also contend that "world politicians" have failed to uphold the Geneva Convention by allowing rockets and bombs to rain down on Israeli civilians and that they have failed by allowing hostile Arab/Muslum states to wage and threaten war and human annialation against the population of Israel?

  • 92. 58 0
  • 91. 0 47
    Israel has the right at least to check the cargo
    • Greek
    • 23.07.10
    • 15:21

    it is clear that Israel has at least the right to check the cargo. All these organizations receive funds from who? who checked the cargo? so for security reasons Israel has the right to stop the vessels and to check the cargo. This is not possible to do it when the vessels are at sea but in a safe port... please alos note that Israel does not refuse the cargo to be brought to Gaza if it is checked...so what is the point to bring cargo that may contain weapons to be used afterwards?

  • 90. 0 0
    arrogant
    • Imad
    • 23.07.10
    • 14:59

    as you period for styaing in Pals land is to finish soon, at leat stay the rest of time with some diginity. Haaretz you have to imporove your site is so slow....

  • 89. 0 0
    Solution
    • Nick Wibberley
    • 23.07.10
    • 14:57

    If the problem were mine, I would recommend welcoming each flotilla formally and treating the ensuing action as a naval exercise. This way, over a period, highly sophisticated techniques would be developed in real time. The episodes could even be filmed for TV with naval experts commenting on the performance. At the end of each exercise the flotilla crews would be thanked, provided with a souvenir, and seen on their way with waves and cheers.

  • 88. 44 0
    uman rights organizations and friendly countries of the Palestinian people should follow a new strategy
    • Rami.Ramallah
    • 23.07.10
    • 14:54

    Israel is Facing a political deadlock after its attack on Marmara For this reason, human rights organizations and friendly countries of the Palestinian people should work to send hundreds of ships Each month to Gaza Strip. Yup, Israel could exercise piracy once &twice but with fall large number of Europeans and Americans by this way There would be a change in public opinion about what is happening in Gaza then the world will realize what it means to put million and half in a big prison and prevent them from getting Food &medicine&Gas & electricity & fuel

  • 87. 66 0
    Israel reserves its righT?
    • Nivin
    • 23.07.10
    • 14:50

    "under international law to use all necessary means to prevent these ships...." Can Ms. Gabriela tell the world which International law is allowing Israel to blockade these ships?

  • 86. 63 0
    • 0 0
      What
      • Kan
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:29

      Read the mandate of Palestine, former owner of the land was The Ottoman Empire then the League of Nations, and then the British Mandate of Palestine (1922) was made for Jewish homeland, Landowner from 1948 Israel, Never the so-called Palestinians. The so-called Palestinians are not mention I UN Res. 242, 338.

  • 85. 82 0
    Israel is missing the point
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 23.07.10
    • 13:47

    The point of peace activists is to make the world take notice of Israel's actions by non violent means. Israel allowing more goods in (for trade, not aid, by the way) is not giving freedom for the Gazans. Flotilla's are an excellent way to attract attention.

  • 84. 68 0
    Is the blockade worthwhile?
    • koala bear and friends
    • 23.07.10
    • 13:40

    What is the point of the blockade now that the Egyptian crossing is open?Are the Israelis just trying to prove something or flex their muscles or are they just plain pig-headed.

    • 0 0
      PIG HEADED
      • JOHN PETERS
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:28

      OH, JUST PIG HEADED. ITS NORMAL FOR ISRAELIS.

    • 0 0
      Correct. Israelis are pig-headed.
      • Lou Medel
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:54

    • 0 0
      Worthwhile ? Of course , Gaza is not a peaceful entity
      • TOMY
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:07

      And letting weapons in is not in interest of anybody including the people of Gaza . As for Egypt , they are more aggressive with Gaza then Israel since they know who the Hamas is . So there is nothing muscly , or pig-heady here , just plain necessary logic . heady

    • 0 0
      Yes the blockade is worthwhile
      • Naive Koala bear
      • 23.07.10
      • 20:57

      If there was no blockade Gaza would become an Iranian stronghold and terrorist port on the Med. Weapons and rockets would be shipped in by the ton. Nop we are not pig headed or trying to flex our muscles. We are just trying to protect ourselves. Do you forget that both Hamas and the Iranian goverment have sworn to wipe us out.

    • 0 0
      Naive John
      • Pig head (not Kosher)
      • 23.07.10
      • 21:01

      No John we are not pigheaded. We just want to defend ourselves. If Gaza was an open port it wouold very soon become an Iranian opening to the Mediterrean Sea. Tons of rockets and other arms to be used against us would be shipped in. You of course have no understanding of the situation. Maybe you should come and live in Southern Israel where it was normal for Israelis to be rocketed day after day. Is that normal enough for you.

    • 0 0
      Worth it or neccesary?
      • Eric
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:19

      The issue is not whether or not the blockade is worth it, but rather if it is neccesary. We have to remember that before operation cast lead, Israel was being hit with rockets on a daily basis. The operation run to at least partially disarm cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and hundreds of lives. Weeks later, a boat litterally full of weapons was stopped trying to smuggle guns into Gaza. These guns are not used for self-defence, and ten thousand automatic weapons can do a whole lot of damage. So the question isn't if this is worth it. The blockade is not done out of spite or punishment, but out of self-defence.

    • 0 0
      Perhaps to create the 3 state solution...
      • Reasonable Thinker
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:48

      That works best for all so let it be. Palestinians said no to a contiguous state in 1947 why should Israel make up for their lack of political prowess?

    • 0 0
      An answer
      • warmonkey
      • 24.07.10
      • 01:33

      The crossing at Egypt is not "open"- Israel decides what goes in and out STILL no building supplies etc... The blockade is about control of Gaza, Israel is not pig=headed, they are OCCUPIERS , and Gaza must be surrounded to be controlled

  • 83. 0 0
    Persistence
    • Nick Wibberley
    • 23.07.10
    • 13:25

    A large point of these flotillas is precisely to be provocative. The more objections and warnings issued against them, the better the flotiilla purposes are achieved. Warning the UN about an intended action doesn’t legitimise it. The hope of these people is that eventually Israel will become weary of the continued negativity generated (rightly or wrongly) and lift the blockade. It may work, it may not, but it's their contribution to issue.

  • 82. 0 0
    About Chris Linthwaite's blogs.....
    • S
    • 23.07.10
    • 12:35

    About quantity, 12 blogs between 10:15 and 11: 27 !! As about quality, see for instance blog of 10:38 :..... "Problem is until there is some kind of military parity the lunatics will run amok. Which is why I support Iran's and Syria's arming of the Lebanese and Iran's right to nuclear weapons to achieve parity with a nation which has threatened to wipe them off the map." Nice? True? So, what the hell is he doing here???

    • 0 0
      Having my four pennies worth
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:31

      You have a problem with that? The fact is since Syria and Iran has armed Hezbollah achieving parity with Israel, or at least ensuring the damage to israel will outeweigh any gains Israel would make in invading Lebanon like it did in 1982. Israel has stopped invading Lebanon, in fact apart from the violations of 1701, overflights and the continued occupation of Ghajar Israel has cceased threatening lebanon. As for Iran achieving parity with Israel prehaps that will force Israel to seek peace. Worth a try

  • 81. 0 0
    Interesting Posts.
    • Stephen ( Geneve ) Switzerland.
    • 23.07.10
    • 11:53

    One cannot but endeavour to understand what are the reasons for this Lebanese venture which most certainly has the hallmarks of a major PR Campaign. One also has to face the reality, that whilst the Palestinian population in Lebanon are classified as second class citizens, without the same rights of ownership or labour laws as the citizens of Lebanon, the awesome reality of said campaign is no other than some fruitless intent to possibly create further strife, whilst those, the true peace campaigners are being undermined by the above. Let us truly believe, that the current easing of the land crossings no doubt is the result of the tragic Turkish Flotilla. However, again, one must understand that Lebanon is at war with Israel, same applies to Libya, where the end result was defined by pragmatism and cool heads. The future of Gaza is more about how Hamas plans its present policies vis a vis recognition of the State of Israel. Whilst Hamas continues to deny said policy, peace has no true possibility, rather it personifies the true meaning of extreme Islamic Jihad. That unfortunately is where the media and many western idealists ignore, mainly because of the stigma associated with being anti Muslim, its far easier to brand Israel as a Zionist Entity, an Apartheid State. Israel, no doubt will prevail, however the price has increased, for world opinion has been incensed by what is considered collective punishment against an oppressed people. That alone is the ace card, for neither Hamas or Israel can come to terms, less so with Pres.Abbas who cannot engage with Hamas. The upcoming flotilla will only exacerbate the already confused state of affairs, giving impetus to a possible tragic stand-off on the high seas. Good day from cool Swiss Alps.

    • 0 0
      Very "cool" and seemingly informed post
      • Yaseen
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:33

      One you can expect from someone who has had too much exposure to high altitudes resulting in too little oxygen reachin the brain. Isreal stole the land and is delaying its return to its rightfull owners. All this agreements/policies/talks and political hogwash merely clouds the realities. You need to return what you've stolen or the victim of your theft will want to take steps necessary to take his/her property back. - End of story. As if to hate Israel for its crimes makes you an extremist...please spare us the official CNN rhetoric.The world is smarter than that......and really has a surplus of armchair intellectuals who gather their opinions from fox/CNN news. The Palestinians are freedom fighters and have every right to fight for what has been taken from them. Zionsim is the extremist ideology and is an indictment on free thinking Jews. Bulldozing someone's house in the middle of the night while their kids are sleeping in it and then be surprised if that person declares war on you shows the level of insanity this Zionist ideology has reached. But yet...we cannot condemn too hard or we'll be called anti-semites blah blah blah....That card has been played so many times it's wearing very very thin very very quickly.

    • 0 0
      Yasseen
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:51

      Which land did we stole? We make war and you've LOOSE it. Why should we return this lands without any peace agrement? If you want back this lands you've to accept our terms. Palie freedom fighters have to understand you cannot take back this lands with fight. Every fight brought to you desctruction. Be very sure in the future wars the destruction would be much more then before.

    • 0 0
      Your concern for the Palestinian peoples rights
      • Reuben Kincaid
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:48

      I am so glad you are concerned for their rights. I hope you will join the many others who are also concerned about their rights and urge Israel to give these people their inalienable right of return to their true homes . I somehow feel though that your post is not very genuine and just a deflection of the true facts that Israel is the true criminal denying these people their rights for decades.

    • 0 0
      Yaseen
      • Jonathan
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:17

      While there is truth is some of what you say as usual in this argument you have adopted one narrative as though it is the whole truth. The reason we find ourselves in today is has much to with the behavior past and present the Palestinians and the surrounding Arab countries. The Israel bad/Palestinians blameless and good argument gets tired after a while. Maybe if people tried to see both sides of the argument we would have had a solution by know.

    • 0 0
      Very, very good, Yaseen
      • Pierre S., Oslo
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:04

      An excellent, lucid and factual summary. This week's best. Thank you!

    • 0 0
      Israel stole the land????
      • ben Zalman
      • 24.07.10
      • 00:44

      Israel was attacked by Egypt and conquered the land. It was then later offered back to Egypt along with the Sinai. Egypt took the Sinai and said they didn’t want Gaza back. It was taken from Egypt not the so called "Gazans" so this claim of having stolen it is bogus. Of course if you want to talk about stolen land, Hamas stole Gaza from the PA in a bloody, murderous coup, there is no doubt about that, of course nobody complains about that do they?

    • 0 0
      Stolen Land,Cnn,Fox et al.
      • Stephen ( Geneve ) Switzerland.
      • 24.07.10
      • 11:21

      Kindly inform which is the stolen land. That you so shrewdly concocted. Either you cannot understand the gist of my post, which is well balanced and above all true to the facts on the ground. I grew up in Israel and served my country through a number of wars. Also I am the seventh son of a Palestinian family, granted in an honory capacity. My knowledge is not derived from any news media, less so am I in any way swayed by the Arab media, even though I do read and understand them. The pristine air of the Swiss Alps is shared by thousands of Arabs who converge on our mountains during July and August every year, which allows me to greet old friends, true the majority are Sunni Muslims. Good day from cool Swiss Alps.

  • 80. 0 0
    Now might be a good time
    • H
    • 23.07.10
    • 11:40

    for G-d to part the waters.

  • 79. 0 0
    how to break the blockade
    • jochai
    • 23.07.10
    • 11:12

    a big passenger ship full of Hamas leaves Gaza and crosses through the blockade without problem destination: Albania.

  • 78. 52 0
    hypocrisy
    • Gokhan
    • 23.07.10
    • 11:08

    How can Israel expect an organization, whose decisions were never implemented, to help her stop the flotillas.

    • 0 42
      Gokhan Israel wants to avoid killings
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 12:08

      Israel was and is sending messages to the world like we send to Turkey. Openly Israel is going to use force if needs arise to stop these ships. Your super genious PM made a mistake that we cant do it. Now everything is clear once again. Don't make any mistake Israel is determined to stop these ships on the way to Gaza. If you resist take the consequenses. Tell me where is the hypcrosy? It is better to use every channel before fightings. Israel is doing exactly this way.

    • 90 0
      Avoiding killings?
      • Gokhan
      • 23.07.10
      • 12:22

      So you think that if flotillas keeping trying to go to Gaza, Israel has the right to aboard the ship and kill the activists? In the international waters? Really? Hmm, interesting!

    • 54 0
      Which right has Israel to stop the aid ships??
      • Muhsin
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:09

      Gaza is not Israeli territory anyway?! I thought you left Gaza...

    • 0 0
      avoid killing but
      • koala bear
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:22

      WILL KILL IF NECESSARY.

    • 79 0
      you are exactly the reason..
      • michael
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:39

      I left Judaism. You didn't even answer Gohkan's simple question. Why should the world bother with your mean spirited blockade. We will send flotilla after flotilla until you leave Palestinians alone. And Israel has no choice in this matter

    • 0 0
    • 0 0
      Gokhan
      • David Israel
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:00

      Does Turkey allow any foreign person to enter through its borders without any control? Or does Turkish authorities allow any ship to enter North Cyprus without any control? When I go To Turkey I have to pay $50.00 at the Ataturk airport at Yesilkoy to get a Visa. The control of the Gaza shore was given to Israel by the Palestinian authority in 1992 with a mutually agreed and signed treaty. What Israel is doing in controlling the Gaza shore is same as what the Turkish military is doing controlling the North Cyprus shores.

    • 0 0
      Muhisn. The 1992 treawty between PLO and Israel
      • David Israel
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:01

      Gives Israel the right to control the Gaza shores.

    • 0 0
      Gokhan if they are militans ready to die
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:23

      What choice are you giving to Israel. Israel has declared that a ship cant go to Gaza. If you decide to go you have to take the consequenses. Aha hide to the pretext of international waters, which is very disputale. Who are you fooling. They were on this ship for to die.It would not make any difference if they would enter to Gazan waters.They were not peace activitist but rather militants. After the take of f your peace activist confessed and regrets that would not die . In the international waters? Really? Hmm, interesting!

    • 0 0
      Michael this is not a religion war
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:30

      What we are talking is the existansialism of Israel. We are not going to leave here. We have no place to go. You are free to send flotillas, if you've the opportunity you can enbark one of them and if you have the courage resist.

    • 0 0
      Muhsin the right to defend Israel
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:43

      Just look at the map. You won't have to be a milltary expert. If they are able to send everyday a few Qassams with a siege, it is easy to calculate how many rockets they would launch if there is not. It is very easy and very simple to lift hte siege. HAMAS should have to accept to quit the launching of rockets.

    • 0 0
      flotilas
      • Marcus
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:53

      I think we all learned that the Flotilla's way works. Perhaps now is the time to use it's momentum e keep on sending them. There's so much Israel can do even when it comes to killing people in international waters...however...with a weekly basis schedule of flotillas the goal might be reached.

    • 0 0
      David Israel
      • Gokhan
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:52

      Turkey is an independent state, of course you have get a visa unless you are a Turkish citizen. The diffirence is Israel does not own Gaza and the blockage she decleared is one-sided. The administrators of Gaza Strip, Hamas, does not recognize the signed treaty you talked about. So, the analogy is another irrelevant defense mechanism as we get used to hearing more and more from Pro-Israelis.

    • 0 0
      Re: Aby
      • Gokhan
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:58

      It is too simple actually. Because Israel does not own neither Gaza nor the international waters, she does not have any right to declare that a ship can not go to Gaza.

    • 0 0
      The right to defend Israel
      • Gokhan
      • 24.07.10
      • 00:02

      The right to defend Israel does not provide an excuse to kill 9 unarmed civilian activists in the international waters. Simply because Israel does not own neither the international waters nor the Gaza Strip.

    • 0 0
      Gokhan is from another planet
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 07:12

      On THIS planet, people wielding iron bars and knives are not unarmed. Anti-Israelis are morons.

  • 77. 0 0
    This is dangerous game
    • Bobbo Krusenstjerna
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:39

    This will most likely bring on the world war 3. The muslims will continue to provoke Israel until mideast has no jewish state and no jewish people. This makes me wonder if Israel is located in the right spot. Madagaskar would have been better by far.

  • 76. 78 0
    israels hypocrisy
    • Jack (sweden)
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:36

    If you like UN why dont you implement the 230 UN security resolutions UN have put on you?!

  • 75. 0 0
    Luke 18
    • Nick Wibberley
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:32

    There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man: And there was a widow in that City; and she came unto him sayng, Avenge me mine adversary. And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard Man; Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me.

  • 74. 44 0
    Head in Sand
    • Davide
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:22

    ...as if Israel's policies have done NOTHING to inflame the Middle East. "Aid ships are the problem"...and the mysterious anger that people feel towards the Israeli government's policies come from some make-believe land of confusion, hate or self-hate. I wonder really if the phrase "living in denial" has any meaning to these policy makers and their supporters? sad.

  • 73. 42 0
    Sounds like panic has set in
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:15

    That is not a request, that is threatening to do the same to nuns as Israel did to the Turks and Americans That willgo down well on American Breakfast television. Israel kills Nuns on the high seas. And even if you don't Nuns held by Israel in the Holy Lands. Lose lose situation, if I was netanyahu i'd ignore it completely.

    • 0 0
      thank god
      • kohelet
      • 23.07.10
      • 15:33

      chris is not Netanyahu. who needs enemys, with friends like that

    • 0 0
      tryying hard
      • James Murray
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:24

      Not a day goes by that Bibi doesn't try harder than ever before to ignore ir. Israel doesn't know it yet, but she lost this war the moment Liberty docked in Gaza 's harbor. Every time Israel uses force, she loses. And this will continue until Israel learns how to fight against peaceniks, or she simply gives up a lost cause.

  • 72. 0 58
    Part of Lebanon used to to belong to Israel
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:04

    I am not a prophet and this is no call to war. I am just stating facts. Southern Lebanon used to belong to the tribe of Asher and the tribe of Naphtali. And what is now the Golan Heights used to belong to the half-tribe of Manasseh. I do not know if the Lord will restore that territory during this age or the age to come. So do not rush to take it.

  • 71. 42 0
    Is ambassador talking about the same international law?
    • peace
    • 23.07.10
    • 10:01

    The same law that applies to ships that were attacked in international water?

  • 70. 0 0
    Legality?
    • Fred
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:52

    Without a UN resolution, both sides can argue, "until the cows come home", if it is legal or not to blockade gaza. There is a UN resolution calling for the lifting of the blockade without any conditions, so that is the LAW. The international community has passed this law, that the blockade is illegal. So, the continued blockade is ILLEGAL, it is quite simple, there is absolutely no 'buts' or 'ifs'.

  • 69. 70 0
  • 68. 68 0
    human rights
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:39

    Not only this ship but more ships from every nation until the wall is down and the prison of 2 million people is finished. Ship after ship after ship heading toward Gaza with humanitarian supplies. These people are true children of God and blessed for all times. Time is young and the insanity of Israel will be reversed by the nations, enforcing peace and putting an end to this Palestinian Holocaust. Amen

    • 0 0
      Holocaust
      • Ecalibur
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:20

      what a delux Holocaust the Arabs in Azza have... tell us more about such holocaust while trying to break ball bouncing record sporting the latest designers trainings and T-shirts... you are a joke

    • 0 0
      You have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of the word
      • History advocate
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:37

      holocaust... Visit a museum and read some history before you make characterizations or (inferred) comparisons like that. You're probably one of those people who compare Gaza to Warsaw. I'd be willing to bet you have no accurate image of the current situation in Gaza or the extermination of European Jewry just a couple generations ago.

    • 0 0
      a little advice
      • Kameel
      • 23.07.10
      • 15:03

      stop this monopoly over this vicious and terrible act, but do not incur any similar acts, irrespective of its magnitude to others. You are doing what all evil human beings did, on a mini scale though, but this would not relieve you from the sin.

    • 0 0
      You are the joke.
      • Dean
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:04

      You'd be happy to see those same kids without cloths, toys or dignity. Your calibur is ZERO.

  • 67. 56 0
    Israel should meanwhille understand that is has no Authority....
    • Turkish Citizen
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:35

    ....to block the Gaza-Strip any further, and that its actions are tatamount to State Terrorism! Israel's actions are well beyond the concept of measured force to an "enemy" that has far less military capacity than the IDF does! If Hamas is an enemy of Peace then so is Likud and even more so the Yisrael Beiteinu Party! Some really have got some nerve on lecturing the World on what is right or wrong,-while their actions are well beyond wrong! They're actions are simply put: Plain Crazy!

    • 0 0
      you havent the faintest idea about what is legal do you?
      • PETER SM
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:52

      Hamas is not that weak they have Ahmadinejad/Hezballa and Erdogan as well

    • 0 0
      Who is enemy and who is not !
      • Yosi
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:06

      Well, PKK has far less military capacity than the TSK but still, it hurts right ? Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu may not be seeking justful peace, but they have not always been there...Fatah and Hamas are always there, but Israeli goverments change..So why did the Palestinians miss the chance with Ehud Barak or Olmert&Livni...they decided for Intifada first, then throw rockets into Israel even after the disengagement from Gaza in 2005....I wonder what would Turkey do, if there was a situation where there would be rocket attacks into Turkey from Northern Iraq`s populated areas

    • 0 0
      Yosi what will be
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:31

      " if there was a situation where there would be rocket attacks into Turkey from Northern Iraq`s populated areas " A few years ago Turkey was criticizing Israel that was using plastic bullets against boys who was throwing rocks to IDF. Today the same situation is in Turkey. You can watch on TV s the situation. What the armed forces of Turkey are doing. They don't use plastic bullets but using water arcs that brokes legs. PKK. if its not launching rocets its a metter of time We know these startegies.In the coming days they will adapt the same . Watch and see. We'll se what Turkey would do.

    • 0 0
      disengagementon
      • James Murray
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:02

      For as long as Israeli planes overfly Gaza, Israel has niot disengaged from Gaza. For as long as Israel holds, by force, a strip of Gazan land as a defense barrier, Israel has not disengaged from Gaza.

    • 0 0
      Murray's disengagement
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:45

      Israel withdrew every single Israeli (civilian and soldier), withdrew all administration, and Hamas is the ruling authority there. Israel is "engaged," in a conflict, but it disengaged its previous interests in Gaza -- namely, the right to protect Jews who were living there.

  • 66. 50 0
    If Israel afraid of weapons...
    • zulu
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:27

    they can check the ships and allow the materials to Gaza, it's simple. Israel isolates itself from it's allies by this unwanted blockade...moreover Gaza is not under it's territory, so the ships travelling to Gaza is legal in world eyes.

    • 0 0
      If the ships aren't carrying weapons...
      • Red herring
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:47

      then their materials will be transported into Gaza via Egypt or Israel by land, it's simple. What's the difference between being checked at sea versus on land, besides the obvious logistical matters inspecting a boat in the open waters? Both actions are still a blockade by the way.

    • 0 0
      Time constraints
      • Eric
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:23

      Checking and testing materials can be a long enough process when working about smuggling. It can take a few days to check the contents of eleven ships, which is only one problem with doing it on water. Israel did however offer to allow the aid through, and allow the the flotilla passengers to supervise. An offer which most flotillas agreed to, including the one which colonel kadaffi`s son was on.

  • 65. 0 0
    Lebanon's
    • Diversion
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:27

    Clearly the Lebonese government is afraid of potential clashes with Hezbollah, so to divert the people's attention from their weak government they suddenly care about the people of Gaza. Every mid-east government does this, they are friends of convenience with Gaza. An enemy ship of any kind would be stopped by any other country as it will by israel

    • 0 0
      You're spot on, Diversion
      • utagawa
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:20

      The Palestinian Arab cause has been used by every Muslim and non-Muslim government (and NGO) for every kind of self-serving diversion and agenda. The Palarabs are the world's biggest pawns and dupes, and are used by peace activists as well as jihadists and unstable political regimes to further their nefarious, self-serving agendas.

    • 0 0
      It is NOT a sudden interest in Gazza
      • American against Israel
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:50

      You consider a humanitarian aid ship the enemy?

  • 64. 64 0
    Stop new Gaza flotilla or we will
    • Colin Wright
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:16

    In other words, the rest of the world should help to enforce a blockade that it has declared illegal.

  • 63. 0 0
    Lebanese Ships
    • Eli
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:16

    Israel and Lebanon are still in a state of war and therefore any Lebanese ships approaching Israel or Israel controlled waters may be sunk without warning. The Israel Navy would be perfectly within its mandate to protect and defend the State of Israel from intrusion by hostile forces-if the ships dare to sail into our area of responsibility, sink them.

    • 0 42
      @ Eli
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:28

      Well thats one option, not a very clever one considering it is a boat full of nuns on a pilgramage to the holy Lands

    • 0 0
      Chris
      • Joe
      • 23.07.10
      • 11:52

      I am sorry, which part of state of war do you not able to digest. Israel and Lebanon are in a state of war. What nonesene possesed you to write this garbage???

    • 0 0
      State of War
      • 23.07.10
      • 12:44

      If the Lebanese ships venture into Israeli territorial waters then Israel has the right to intercept them. Otherwise, IDF, MYOB.

    • 0 0
      @ Joe
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:22

      The ship is not going to Israel it is going to Gaza. Which according to the nightclub bouncer is not part of Israel.

    • 0 0
      Sea
      • kan
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:00

      The sea uotside Gaza is Israels.

  • 62. 0 46
    Stop the lies the craziness there is no starvation in Gaza read on
    • Chafeeka
    • 23.07.10
    • 09:04

    Gaza's markets are full of produce, thousands of tons of supplies are travelling into Gaza every week through the Israeli-controlled border crossings, and there is no starvation or humanitarian crisis. It was always obvious that the flotilla was not the humanitarian exercise it was said to be. And now we can see that the real purpose of this invasion -- backed by the Turkish Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), a radical Islamic organization outlawed by Israel in 2008 for allegedly serving as a major component in Hamas's global fund-raising machine -- was to incite a violent uprising in the Middle East and across the Islamic world. As I write, reports are coming in of Arab rioting in Jerusalem. The notion - uncritically swallowed by the lazy, ignorant and bigoted western media - that the flotilla organisers are ‘peace activists' is simply ludicrous. Danish Institute for International Studies details the part played by the IHH in Islamist terror in Afghanistan, Bosnia and Chechnya. According to the French magistrate Jean-Louis Bruguiere testifying at the Seattle trial of would-be al Qaeda Millenium bomber Ahmed Ressamin, the IHH had played ‘[a]n important role' in the al Qaeda Millenium bomb plot targeting Los Angeles airport. It was also involved in weapons trafficking, and played in addition a key role in galvanizing anti-Western sentiment among Turkish Muslims in the lead-up to the 2003 war in Iraq. ‘Peace activists' these people most certainly are not. And this flotilla was but the latest jihadi attack, deploying the Islamists' signature strategy of violence and media manipulation. It is becoming ever more clear that Islamist terror attacks like this are fiendishly staged theatrical events in which the western media - and beyond them, western governments -- play an absolutely essential role in the drama. If those media and governments refused to swallow the lies and instead called operations like this and the players behind it for what they actually are, such terrorist operations would not happen. The Islamist strategy of war against Israel is carefully calibrated to deploy the most effective weapon in its armoury in the cause of jihadi violence - the western media. Right on cue, western governments accordingly deliver their own script in condemning the victims of terror for defending themselves. And so, courtesy of the west's fifth columnists, yet another nail is driven into the west's own coffin. Let's see whether this time the western elites show any signs of waking from their lethal trance.

  • 61. 0 0
    Sounds like bullying to me.
    • Koala bear and friends
    • 23.07.10
    • 08:53

    Said the 240lb man to the 140lb weakling. Stop annoying me or else.

  • 60. 0 0
    IMAGINE ISRAEL SENT A FLOTILLA TO AID KURDS
    • CHAFEEKA
    • 23.07.10
    • 08:49

    Imagine.... Members of the 'National Union' from Israel charter a boat and sail to Turkey to bring 'aid' to the Kurds. All this would be supported by the government of Israel On the way they chant ‘Death to the muslims’ and give interviews to Israeli television in which they proclaim the willingness to be martyred. The Turkish government tells the boat to stop when it approaches Turkey. The boat continues and when Turkish soldiers board the ship they are set upon by National Union members with Iron bars, sticks, catapults and knives before they are being subdued. The boat is towed to Turkey and although they injured 6 Turkish soldiers, they are all released and the ‘aid’ from the boat is distributed to the Kurds by the Turks. The Israeli government would protest the barbaric treatment by the Turkish soldiers and demand other countries do the same. Riots would break out all over the world and Turkish embassies would be besieged by mobs of angry Jews. Yeah right! After ...’The Turkish government tells the boat to stop when it approaches Turkey.’...the Turkish government would see this for what it is, an act of war, send a warship and blast it out of the water. The lunatics are running the asylum!

    • 0 0
      Kurds in Turkey, Palestinians in Israel
      • Yahya Yakupoglu
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:32

      Turks and Kurds established the Turkish Republic together. Kurds have Turkish Nationality like many other ethnic groups in Turkey. Many of the major businessman, ministers, generals even presidents of Turkey hah origin (can you imagine that for Palestinians and Israel). Unlike Israel, Turkey fights with terrorists not with the entire Kurdish community. Israel looks like fighting with terrorism too but as a preconception considers any single Palestinian or Arab not now the Turk as a terrorist. So don’t try to justify Israel’s screw ups with dumb examples.

    • 0 0
      Dont ever confuse Kurds with Pals, nor Turkey with Israel!
      • Azeri man
      • 23.07.10
      • 14:16

      Kurds are part of Turkey, and they are not blockaded, they can study, eat what they want, can live their live as they wish( sure there exist some problem like teaching in mother tonque etc) vs. Palastinians on the other hand are put under survivor test. Kurds are struggling to learn and speak thier language freely, but Palastinians are struggling to survive. That simple. So plz Dont ever confuse Kurds with Pals, nor Turkey with Israel as of now!

    • 0 0
      Yahya and Azeriman
      • David Israel
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:04

      Please tell these to Ahmet Turk, Leyla Zana and Baydar. They do not believe you.

    • 0 0
      CHAFEEKA........
      • FrancoKurd
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:56

      If you want to sent a flotilla to aid Kurds, no problem for Turks. ( Probably it will be a flying flotilla...) But remember, most of the flotilla activists were Kurds.... And there is no siege on Kurdish territories.......

    • 0 0
      not the same
      • Edgar
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:58

      But the kurds are part of Turkey and want to separate and Palestine is not part of Israel and wants the end of Israel occupation

  • 59. 0 0
    These flotilla's guys don't have peace in mind...
    • Esther
    • 23.07.10
    • 08:47

    nor genuine help for anyone...

  • 58. 0 0
    Gaza and its regime are at a state of war with the nation-state of the Jewish people...
    • Jehudah Ben-Israel Qatzrin, Israel
    • 23.07.10
    • 08:35

    ...one the regime of Hamas in Gaza hopes to see wiped off the face of earth. In order to advance such an outcome Gaza has been launching rocket and missile attacks on Israel - a UN member state - and its citizens. Israel, despite the state of war, unlike any other country on earth, has continued supplying Gaza with all supplies needed to maintain life. It is time that people of true good will helped to put a stop to the aggression generated from Gaza, and do it now!!!

    • 0 0
      How wonderfully 19th-century of you, Jehudah
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:02

      "Gaza and its regime are at a state of war with the nation-state of the Jewish people..." A. State. Of. War!!!! That concept went out the window in 1945, Jehudah, which is why nobody actually bothers to "declare war" on anyone any more. Or haven't you noticed that oddity? Since 1945 there is only "armed conflict" - i.e. shooting - and the test of wether or not there is an "armed conflict" is simplicity itself; you look to see if anyone is shooting at anyone. There is no "armed conflict" between Hamas and Israel, and there hasn't been since Olmert called a halt to Operation Cast Lead.

    • 0 0
      Jehudah Qatzrin is not in Israel.It is in occupied Syrian Heights.
      • labhras
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:18

      you are an ilegal settler and an accomplice in land theft.

    • 0 0
      Your point being?
      • Ivor Biggun
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:35

      It hasn't escaped anybody's attention that israel is following a policy of starvation and isolation in an attempt to dehumanise a people in order to make them disappear. Two sides to every story

    • 0 0
      Jehudah - the agression from Gaza was stopped from June 08 to October 08
      • Miggy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:41

      As Logios post says Hamas maintained the ceasefire, not easy with all the other groups there, and the homemade rockets had stopped. It was Israel who broke the ceasefire because they will chose military might over peace every time.

    • 0 0
      Wrong, Miggy
      • Jasper - Milwaukee
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:33

      Stopped means zero rockets and mortars. In the time period you cite, various sources put the shelling at 77 to 93. Down considerably from averages over the years prior, but not "stopped". This was the reason for Cast Lead. Now, the shelling is almost zero, but still there.

    • 0 0
      The Cease Fire Agreement was Actually
      • Doug
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:12

      holding quite well and was broken by Israel due to their miscalculation "Ehud Barak, the Israeli defence minister, had personally approved the Gaza raid, the Associated Press said. The Israeli military concluded that Hamas was likely to want to continue the ceasefire despite the raid," Here is a link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/israelandthepalestinians

    • 0 0
      state of war
      • arik
      • 24.07.10
      • 05:48

      Whu not ? For years rockets were delivered to Israel. Is that terrorism or act of war or both together? Hammas is still ruling Gaza and arming itself for another conflict. It is still holding an Israel soldier and impeding even the visit of the Red Cross. Iran wants Gaza in order to raise another stronghold in the region. Iran is an antisemitic country repudiated by most of the world and being precisely boycotted by all the world. Lets put one plus one and what do we get? A tense situation in which any preemptive act of Israel is justified. Then the question again. Are we in state of war? Seems srystal clear that we are now in a situation of ceasse fire that will become very soon a state of war. Israel; has all the reasons of the world to wipe Gaza . Whaty will happen then? Nothing. Egypt will applaud, and Iran wlll get nervous and a few people in Europe's civic society will demonstarte and cry for boycott./ I would not worry too much about that/

    • 0 0
      Piggy
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:34

      "Jehudah - the agression from Gaza was stopped from June 08 to October 08" Meanwhile, there were still rocket attacks from Gaza. Some ceasefire.

    • 0 0
      Doug has it backwards
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:44

      The ceasefire was broken by Hamas trying to tunnel into Israel.

  • 57. 43 0
    what is Natanyahu and Lieberman trying to hide?
    • zk
    • 23.07.10
    • 08:33

    Let the ship go to GAZA and the whole fuss will go away...Enough of this siege and collective punishment....

  • 56. 0 0
    aid ships
    • 23.07.10
    • 08:28

    blow them out of the water

  • 55. 0 0
    Stop the ship aid before wasting more innocent lives
    • Lebanese Eli
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:57

    Israel's Government/Army has no mercy whether you're a child, civilian or even an ally like Turkey or USA...Here's why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK8Z3i3aTq4&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fuZKyTGKYo&feature=fvst http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3XUo60qpE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH-oZHBzOe8&feature=related

  • 54. 0 0
    Stop the ship aid before wasting more innocent lives
    • Lebanese Eli
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:56

    Israel's Government/Army has no mercy whether you're a child, civilian or even an ally like Turkey or USA...Here's why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK8Z3i3aTq4&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fuZKyTGKYo&feature=fvst http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3XUo60qpE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH-oZHBzOe8&feature=related

  • 53. 0 0
    Lonely
    • leo
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:53

    Hmm I am curious in your last interview as a worst AMBASSADOR of Israel you said Israel has never been like this LONELY in the entire history of its existance, now I WONDER WHY , Gabriela no body believes in HITLER'S policy that FORCE AND POWER IS EVERYTHING GO WATCH MOVIE AVATAR AND READ HISTORY AND TELL YOUR MASTERS THE FACTS OF THE HISORY THAT FORCE NEVER WIN .

    • 0 0
      @ Leo
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:38

      Problem is until there is some kind of military parity the lunatics will run amock. Which is why i support iran's nd syria's arming of the lebanese and iran's right to nuclear weapons to achieve parity with a nation which has threatened to wipe them off the map.

    • 0 0
      Wipe off the map
      • Petra
      • 23.07.10
      • 14:09

      Iran may yet be the one who is 'wiped off the map.' Israel cannot lose and the Iranians can't win.

  • 52. 0 0
    Israelis organize an aid convoy to Lebanon to help
    • I suggest
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:48

    the deprived Palestinian Arabs there.

    • 0 0
      Palestinains
      • Joe
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:28

      Please spare the Palestinians any help from the Israelis. They had suffered enough over the years from this help. Thanks but ' Hell no thanks".The Chutzpah....

  • 51. 0 0
    Gaza doesn't belong to Israel!!!!!
    • Cliff
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:47

    It is an independent country, and - under the International Law - should be allowed to exercise its right to receive any ships and cargos it likes!! If not - the same restrictions should be applied to Israel!!!

    • 0 0
      with Hamas the freedom of Gaza; this is only a comedy show!
      • Winner
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:39

      A yeah independent country hah; With Hamas isnt it?

    • 0 0
      Gaza is not a country, Cliff. Google list of countries.
      • Jasper - Milwaukee
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:39

      Gaza is a collection of unfortunates terrorized by Hamas. It is like a section of Los Angeles ruled by Mexican gangs, that the police and fire services don't even try to control. You don't call something a country because they can't get along.

    • 0 0
      Hamas - legal government!!
      • cliff
      • 23.07.10
      • 14:07

      Hamas has been DEMOCRATICALLY elected by the Palestinians to be their government. Every person who understands and values the concept of democracy should respect it!!

    • 0 0
      Cliff:
      • Jasper - Milwaukee
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:11

      Voting is only one facet of democracy. Voting regularly is another. Do you think you will live to see another election in Gaza?

    • 0 0
      Hama(n)s Illegal government
      • alexander
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:14

      Yes democratically ellected ans then undemocratically killing off and getting rid of the Ftah opposition. A party like Hmas is only chosen ONCE!

    • 0 0
      Gaza is not israel
      • Marcus
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:32

      you're so right Cliff..maybe the rest of the world should stop Israel's boats from getting into their ports....a boycott of all goods from israel coming into our ports.

    • 0 0
      frustration
      • James Murray
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:38

      Israel will forever rue the day she demanded Gaza as part settlement to end war with Egypt. So which is better? An Egyptian tank you can shoot at? Or an engineer with a cutting torch melting holes in steel walls underground?

    • 0 0
      gaza government
      • chris b
      • 25.07.10
      • 10:36

      Gaza is in limbo. It has a de facto government. Hamas was elected, but the government was dissolved by the "palestinian president". Since the dissolution Hamas has clung to power in Gaza. Despite murdering their opposition and enforcing some rather strange and quasi-medieval laws on its people; they are the only negotiating party in Gaza.

  • 50. 0 0
    lonely
    • leo
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:46

  • 49. 0 0
    keep going
    • will
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:39

    israel just doesn't get it. the world is fed up with the palestinian issue and the gaza siege above all. A turkish ship tried to break the blockade, israel stops the convoy and loosens the blockade after international outcry. The world demands that israel lifts the blockade totally, israel ignores. Bring in flotilla after flotilla, bring a thousand flotillas if necessary... perhaps after 25 flotillas the gaza siege will break once and for all...

  • 48. 0 0
    okay
    • David from Haifa
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:24

    listen we are going to stop this ship and all other ships to hamas gaza. hamas and gaza are our enemies. they are terrorists who shoot missles at us. none of you on this site live in israel. probably some from saudi arabia or othe countries who hate jews. you bigots want peace... stop this boat and alow us to talk to Abbas without you bigots stirring the pot. i KNOW haaretz loves anti israel bigotry but please post this.

  • 47. 0 0
    International law 1."On the basis that Hamas is the ruling entity of Gaza and Israel is in the midst of an armed struggle against that ruling entity, the blockade is legal," said Philip Roche, partner in the shipping disputes and risk management team with law firm Norton Rose
    • PETER SM
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:19

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65133D20100602 Q&A: Is Israel's naval blockade of Gaza legal?Related NewsIsrael calls Gaza blockade critics "hypocrites" Wed, Jun 2 2010 Israel attacked ships "without warning," freed activists say Wed, Jun 2 2010 Israelis pointed guns at our heads: Turkish captain Tue, Jun 1 2010 Israel deports flotilla activists after world outcry Tue, Jun 1 2010 Israelis pointed guns at our heads: Turkish captain Tue, Jun 1 2010Related TopicsWorld » By Jonathan Saul LONDON | Wed Jun 2, 2010 9:16am EDT CAN ISRAEL IMPOSE A NAVAL BLOCKADE ON GAZA? Yes it can, according to the law of blockade which was derived from customary international law and codified in the 1909 Declaration of London. It was updated in 1994 in a legally recognized document called the "San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea." Under some of the key rules, a blockade must be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral states, access to neutral ports cannot be blocked, and an area can only be blockaded which is under enemy control. "On the basis that Hamas is the ruling entity of Gaza and Israel is in the midst of an armed struggle against that ruling entity, the blockade is legal," said Philip Roche, partner in the shipping disputes and risk management team with law firm Norton Rose. 2.From Times Online June 1, 2010 http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article7142055.ece Gaza fleet raid raises questions over legality of Israel’s blockadeDr Douglas Guilfoyle -"During an armed conflict, however, a belligerent state is entitled to blockade enemy ports as a measure of economic warfare. Historically, such a blockade had to be conducted close to shore. In modern law, however, a blockade may be enforced against neutral vessels on the high seas, where the events on the Marvi Marmara took place. A belligerent may stop, inspect and divert any vessel it suspects of intending to breach its blockade, which is what Israel says it intended to do. While a merchant vessel has a right to freedom of navigation on the high seas, it can be intercepted legally when its express intention is to breach a blockade. The ships that were intercepted by Israel, however, were carrying aid. The law or armed conflict requires that blockading states allow aid through to the civilian population; however, the blockading state may control the channel through which aid is delivered, and that is what Israel has been doing. "-

  • 46. 0 0
    Mr Shalev
    • Reuben Kincaid
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:15

    Mr. Shalev Sir, you call upon the world to act in the UN but when do you and your cohorts intend on acting on what the world has called upon you? Israel always gimme gimme gimme gimme but never gives anything back. Resign from the UN your state is useless.

    • 0 0
      Mr?
      • SM
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:22

      I guess any sense of being accurate is a bit beyond those frothing at the mouth. But just so you can continue howling at the moon with the right gender, I think you will find that the Israeli Ambassador to the UN is a woman. The clue is in the name 'Gabriella'. Anyway - back to your ranting, sorry to interrupt

  • 45. 0 0
    Here's The Latest News...
    • Yosemite
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:15

    According to the Lebanese Al-Akhbar newspaper, Hariri's aides are trying to convince Fateh in Lebanon and Ramallah to agree to fight with them against Hizbullah since the final decision of the International Court in charge of investigating Hariri Sr. death is going to name Hizbullah as being behind the assassination.

    • 0 0
      In you wildest wet dreams
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:44

      Hariri and nasrallah are now best buddies. Hezbollah has the firepower to take over Lebanon anytime they want. A consequence of israeli lobbying to ensure the lebanese army didn't get the necessary arms to defend lebanon.

    • 0 0
      More lies from Linthwaite
      • IW
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:03

      Israel prevented Lebanon from getting arms to fight Hezbollah? As you say, "in you (sic) wildest wet dreams." Where do you get your "information" from? The Lebanese army does not lack arms--it lacks will and political direction. Your mind is just full of lies which are trotted out at any Israel-bashing opportunity, isn't it?

  • 44. 0 0
    @ murat #1...
    • e l pratt
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:07

    A better way of saying who is at fault is that the 'security crew' of the mavi marmara drew first blood.

  • 43. 0 0
    Obviously...
    • Yosemite
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:06

    Syria is trying to start a war. Assad and Nasrallah don't want to be tried at the Hague for murdering Hariri. Rather than be found guilty of murder, these two dictators are attempting to start a war with Israel. Just say it like it is Israel. Don't let these scumbags get away with it. Notify Congress! It's time to take off the gloves!

    • 0 0
      Yeah right
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:46

      the United nations are going to destabilise lebanon and send it into civil war when Hariri Jnr and nasrallah have kissed and made up Yep that is really going to happen, and it just happens to be a perfect scenerio for israel.

  • 42. 0 0
    who do the idf fear more farmers or aid passengers
    • sharon
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:05

    i have to diss israel when i can free gaza free palestine i also go under 30 diffrent names

  • 41. 0 0
    Free Palestine
    • FreeStyle
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:04

    Long live the Palestinian people in Palestine with no racist segregation walls

  • 40. 0 0
    ok guys let's get the paint ball guns out for show and pack the pistols in our backs again
    • idf
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:04

    who's giving orders in the idf a five year old

  • 39. 0 0
  • 38. 0 0
  • 37. 0 0
    ... and the silence of the world is deafening
    • Siddhartha
    • 23.07.10
    • 07:00

    During the last aid ship from Libya, US SG Ban Moon asked to open up the Gaza blockade. Israel must realize that it is alone in this. Furthermore, more flotillas are coming. This time from America, Germany and India. It better come with a long term solution to this - otherwise it has to do firefighting every time with the world silent!

  • 36. 0 0
    A Lebanese joke
    • IW
    • 23.07.10
    • 06:35

    Lebanon has kept its own Palestinian "brothers" in refugee camps since 1948, without any civil rights whatsoever, yet profess to be so concerned about the Gazan Palestinians who just, by the way, opened a fancy new shopping mall. So much for the "plight" in Gaza and so much for the "concern" of Lebanon. And, since this flotilla is being ostensibly organized by a Palestinian in Lebanon, it appears his flotilla would be better directed to Beirut than to Gaza.

    • 0 0
      The Palestinians in Lebanon at least have the right to travel
      • Miggy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:34

      The Palestinians in Gaza do not.

    • 0 0
      There
      • Kan
      • 23.07.10
      • 13:01

      There is non "Palestinians" in Gaza, They are Gazans.

    • 0 0
      @ IW
      • Eva
      • 23.07.10
      • 14:11

      And where do you want us to keep them? In our homes? or give them our land so you be releaved? And i beleive that you should know this: in Lebanon, th governement is not risponsable of the palestinian refuges, the UN is through the UNRWA so go blame the UN my dear for keeping them in such horrible conditions!

    • 0 0
      To Eva
      • IW
      • 23.07.10
      • 22:51

      Well, for one thing, when 800,000 Jews were kicked out or fled Arab countries in the same 1948 war, Israel accepted them with open arms and they became full citizens. While the Arabs talk a lot about their brotherhood, their actions completely belie their words.What do you mean "put them"? Give them rights, make them citizens like anyone else. That the "brotherly" thing to do.

    • 0 0
      Why Does Israel have to Allow Gazans to Travel Through It
      • Reasonable Thinker
      • 23.07.10
      • 23:52

      If Gazans guaranteed no aggression they probably could travel but failing that why must Israel allow them too? There is no law that states this, so why must the priviledge be granted?

  • 35. 0 0
    Food and Aid is going to Inflame the Mid-East??
    • Pal-Atlanta
    • 23.07.10
    • 06:28

    Israel, this terror entity of a state is blaming aid ships for escalation in the mid east. cement and wheat is the problem not the massacre of innocent civilians or the brutal occupation according to Israel.

  • 34. 0 0
    Nuns on the Run?
    • Mark of Lewiston
    • 23.07.10
    • 06:20

    The lead ship is the Mary (Miriam) named for a Jewish woman, There will be nuns aboard. They will not be running guns or providing weapons. Israel is not in a state of war with the Roman Catholic Church, last I checked. Giving Obama a list of banned items is not coming into compliance with the requirements for a blockade. The list has to be published publicly and things on the list have to be allowed in unlimited quantities. Two crossings open occasionally for half a day does not allow unlimited entry of non-banned goods. Saying the blockade has been eased and actually doing it are not the same thing. There are publications who publish the FACTS daily. The siege has not been eased. That includes which crossings and when they are open for goods transfer. Everything that passes is already paid for, in advance.

    • 0 0
      @ Mark of Lewiston
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 11:17

      The gaza siege has become an industry in Israel providing jobs and large amounts of money to support the economy in Southern Israel. It is a major reason why Israel is happy with the occassional rocket and the continued captivity of Shalit. Economically it makes sense for israel to maintain a conflict with HAMAS, as long as HAMAS doesn't achieve weapons parity with Israel. That is why Israel is upset with the attempts to run the Gaza blockade it threatens a nicew little earner where israel provides everything for gaza at a price. Paid for by the International community. No profit in peace

  • 33. 0 0
    lebanon aid flotilla
    • ed skutnik
    • 23.07.10
    • 06:11

    i think the israeli navy should go out there and sinkevery one of thos ships laden with aid for the Palestinians - let's hear it for the idf.

  • 32. 0 0
  • 31. 0 0
    Israeli Piracy, Occupation and Shalev
    • Max
    • 23.07.10
    • 06:04

    I think Gabriela Shalev should retire with whatever dignity she has left. Trying to justify the legality of the Israeli occupation and settlement enterprise is idiocy, trying to justify Israeli murder and piracy in international waters is absolute idiocy.

  • 30. 0 0
    Consequences of a pointless policy
    • Logios
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:34

    Originally, the "siege" policy was motivated as the means to make the Gaza population unhappy with Hamas rule and induce them to overthrow it. It didn't work, and actually should not have been expected to work because historically, Arab masses do not overthrow rulers, Arab militaries do that, but in Gaza Hamas IS the military. The policy failed to achieve its goal, but was continued nevertheless under changing explanations (the latest was the Shalit excuse). Only after the "flotilla" debacle is the policy changing. How much damage can a pointless, visibly failed policy cause? 1. For the Turkish-led "flotilla" incident, read the various articles, and consider in addition that the UN may become more inclined to send the Goldstone Report to the Hague. Also, the governing Islamic party in Turkey might have found the excuse to break relations with Israel, which it avoided doing for fear of the Turkish military. The Turkish military might now be convinced that this has to be done. 2. Operation Cast Lead (late 2008) was caused by the pointless "siege" policy. Hamas offered to continue the then prevailing cease fire provided that Israel lifts the siege. Israel refused. Result: Abbas had to stop peace negotiations with Israel. Olmert said he was very close to a deal with the PA, but then Cast Lead "happened". No, idiot, it didn't just happen, Olmert preferred the "siege" over a peace deal. Such an incredible choice should go into the history books!

  • 29. 0 0
    How to put an end to the "flotilla" problem once and for all
    • Logios
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:33

    So far, Israel has decided to allow into Gaza all items except those fit for military use. What remains of the "siege" is not allowing the Export of finished goods even if raw materials can come in, as well as the prevention of movement of Gazans in and out of that territory (irrespective of security considerations). The inability to export essentially destroys the Gaza economy, rendering the population destitute and in need of food relief. With exports, the Gazans will not be in need of relief and all future "flotillas" will become pointless. Here is a good way to end the "flotillas", just lift the rest of the "siege". And here is another reason: a legal opinion (by the UN's Human Rights Council): "The [Goldstone] Report states that Israeli acts that deprive Palestinians in the Gaza Strip of their means of subsistence, employment, housing and water, that deny their freedom of movement and their right to leave and enter their own country, that limit their rights to access a court of law and an effective remedy, could lead a competent court to find that the crime of persecution, a crime against humanity, has been committed"- unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/0/9B63490FFCBE44E5C1257632004EA67B?opendocument . In any event, the prevention of ships going into Gaza is justified by security concerns. The ports of Ashdod (Israel) and El-Arish (Egypt) are near the Gaza strip and should be used instead.

  • 28. 0 0
    It's an odd argument, isn't it?
    • Johnboy
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:28

    Israel: 'You must stop this ship! UN: Why, exactly? Israel: Because it will get me mad, and when I get mad I go crazy!!! I don't know about the rest of you guys, but it seems to me that the problem isn't so much the "provocative behaviour" of Lebanon as it it is a problem caused by Israel's lack of "anger management". Just let the ship dock in Gaza, guys, and the Middle East won't be "inflamed" because there won't actually be a "confrontation". How hard is that to fathom?

    • 0 0
      Johnboy's absurd response ...Anger ? You think so?
      • Ross
      • 23.07.10
      • 16:21

      So according to you Israel is wanting to stop the JIHADISTS ship becauce Israel is angry? What a silly comment.Remember the ship is going to come from a country ISRAEL is fightin.They are the enemy not a friedly nation. .And th eprovocation is not coming from Israel but from its great enemy Hizbollah,Syria aiding and abneting by Iran. Put the onus on them not on Israel calling it the ANGER MANAGEMENT. A totally spurious comment...

  • 27. 0 0
    Legal warfare
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:18

    Whats all that stuff of legality. An blockade is an act of war, under the Law of War an legal one. Breaking an blockade has the same legality. Some israelis seems errorly to think that if Israel uses an legal act of war, the act itself is legalised.and the counteract of war suddenly is illegal. Israel claims still to be in war with Lebanon OK, than now the both war parties are heading to an escalation, but dont ask UN to take side in that war. If the UN takes side, it takes part in this war. Thats quite impossible. Not all members will support this. If you dont want an war escalation, clear the mess by ending the blockade, import and export, totally, weapons influx excepted.

  • 26. 0 0
    They understand only force
    • John Sandres
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:13

    We are in a state of war with Lebanon, and there is no need to beg UN and other pro-terror organizations to stop them. Because these people just understand and respect force only, so please GIVE IT TO THEM once for all. This time we need to open fire on the first ship, and the other one will run away, and so many others that are planing to do so.

    • 0 0
      John Sandres is another who lives in the 19th century
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:09

      "We are in a state of war with Lebanon," The concept of "a state of war" went out the window in 1945, John. That's why nations no longer "declare war". There is only "armed conflict" and, so sorry, currently there is no "armed conflict" between Israel and Lebanon. A Lebanese ship is therefore entitled to the freedom of the seas, and it most certainly can not be interferred with by the Israeli navy.

    • 0 0
      yeah! sink 'em all!
      • James Murray
      • 23.07.10
      • 20:20

      And once again Israel will incease its rate of descent into the yawning abyss of historical mighty blunders and wallow for yet a while in its own unrighteous dream of glory and grandeur past but not forgotten.

  • 25. 0 0
    It cannot be ruled out ..
    • un2here
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:05

    .. that Israel intends to kill all Palestinians either.

  • 24. 69 55
    They Are Peaceful Aid Ships
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:01

    NO WEAPONS ARE ON BOARD EITHER SHIP, HENCE iSRAEL WILL ATTACK THEM. WE WISH BOTH SHIPS MUCH SUCCESS IN BRINGING HELP TO THE BESEIGED POPULATION LIVING UNDER ISRAELI OPRESSION.

  • 23. 0 0
    I won
    • European
    • 23.07.10
    • 05:00

    'all necessary means to prevent these ships from violating the ... naval blockade.' I won mrs Shalev's game, I have filled in the missing word:'illegal naval blockade' Can I get a cookie now?

  • 22. 51 0
    Hezballa run Lebanon wants to be able to ship missiles to Hamastan unimpeded.
    • PETER SM
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:56

    So their brothers can continue to rain their missiles onto Israeli civillians as and when they please. They can dream on.

  • 21. 0 0
  • 20. 57 0
    Israeli Hypocrisy
    • Galahad
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:45

    Israel wants to appeal to the international community for help when it wants something, but thumbs its nose at the world when the international community appeals to Israel to stop the settlements, open Gaza, stop house demolitions, etc., etc. What hypocrisy!!!

  • 19. 51 0
    when you strip people from their dignity
    • northern neighbor
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:41

    you lose your own.

  • 18. 58 0
    International law
    • Haron Gazan
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:41

    can anybody explain how Shalev apply international law by attacking a Turkish civil ship in international water? Thank you in advance.

    • 0 0
    • 0 0
      I can.
      • Jasper - Milwaukee
      • 23.07.10
      • 06:14

      Israel is enforcing a blockade, which meets the specifications set forth by San Remo, against Gaza, which is actively hostile toward Israel. When you research San Remo, you will see that the "international waters" concept does not apply in this case. You're welcome.

    • 0 0
      Do you study law?
      • Alan
      • 23.07.10
      • 06:25

    • 0 0
      The explanation you requested
      • Lasting Peace
      • 23.07.10
      • 07:32

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_assessments_of_the_Gaza_flotilla_raid

    • 0 0
      I can answer that Haron
      • The Prophet
      • 23.07.10
      • 08:12

      The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, 12 June 1994 (para 67(a)) entitles Israel to intercept ships which it reasonably believes are seeking to break the blockade, even in international waters. Gaza flotilla spokesperson Greta Berlin acknowledged that the primary goal of the flotilla organizers was political, not humanitarian, telling AFP on May 27, "This mission is not about delivering humanitarian supplies, it's about breaking Israel's siege” of Gaza. Israel had warned the flotilla repeatedly not to try to land in Gaza, but the flotilla leaders chose to ignore the warnings. Both Israel and Egypt offered to offload any humanitarian cargo at their ports and transfer it to Gaza.

    • 0 0
      Sure
      • Joe
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:00

      They should not have been there with evil intentions. And they got what they desereved. Simple.

    • 0 0
      There is no such thing as "a state of war", Dan
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:11

      That concept was thrown out the window in 1945. There is only "armed conflict", and at this precise moment in time there is no more an "armed conflict" between Hamas and Israel than there is between.... gosh!... Lebanon and Israel.

    • 0 0
      Man, that's some ignorance, Jasper.
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:15

      "Israel is enforcing a blockade, which meets the specifications set forth by San Remo" Waving the San Remo manual about does not "legitimize" a blockade when there is no "armed conflict" at sea. "When you research San Remo, you will see that the 'international waters' concept does not apply in this case." Err, actually, it does. San Remo says that you can declare your blockade zone so that it is *in* international waters, but it then makes it impossible for your navy to "spring a surprise" outside that declared blockade zone. Which, of course, is exactly what the IDF did......

    • 0 0
      Actually, I much prefer this one, Lasting Peace
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 10:18

      After all, this one has the advantage of being correct http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/03/EDGF1DPDK9.DTL#ixzz0puW6Bdk9

    • 0 0
      Israel is not a signatory of San remo
      • Chris linthwaite
      • 23.07.10
      • 11:23

      and therefore is not under the provisions of that manual. Therefore to use it as a defence is disengenuous when Israel only applies the rules if ot suits it. Want to use san Remo as a defence sign it

    • 0 0
      State of war
      • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      • 23.07.10
      • 18:12

      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search State of war may refer to: a state of war is the situation when two or more states are at war with each other, with or without a real armed conflict

    • 0 0
      Dumboy's state of war
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:30

      "That concept was thrown out the window in 1945" No, it was your brain that was thrown out a window. You're a bloody idiot if there ever was one. So, there is no such thing as a "war" anymore?

    • 0 0
      Dumboy's "no conflict at sea"
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:31

      "when there is no "armed conflict" at sea" What about weapons smuggling from the sea, you brain-dead dupe?

    • 0 0
      arik
      • armed conflict?????
      • 24.07.10
      • 09:50

      No armed conflict in Gaza.????Seriously?? Hammas arming itself for what? Self defence? Israel has the right to thwart Hammas built up. It is a terrorist organization willing to destroy Israel and ruling a piece of land bordering Israel. Israel has also the right to thwart Hizbalah built up another terrorist organization which captured a country. In both cases Israel is in state of war or conflict with these organizations . The question is when, at what time and in what condition Israel will be launching a preemtive strike. It is logical. Israel has the right to do it. What will happen next? Nothing. Obama will veto any condemnation of Israel at the S Council.

    • 0 0
      I am talking to an ignorant oaf a.k.a. "SDHD"
      • Johnboy
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:24

      Pre-1945 there was a regime of law whereby making a "declaration of war", created a "state of war" between two countries. Post-1945 all of that law was thrown out, which is precisely why nobody "declares war" any more i.e. as a LEGAL construct "war" has been replace by "armed conflict", and so the term "war" is now a colloquialism. After all, the Olmert govt actually took weeks to decide wether (or not) the 2006 Lebanon conflict was "a war", and the same is true of Operation Cast Lead. LEGALLY it didn't matter either way, because there is no question that both were "armed conflicts", and under current Int'l Law that's all that matters.

    • 0 0
      Let's give Dumboy a small slap of reasoning
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 11:03

      Okay, after 1945. Fine. The Geneva Conventions pertain to international law. Why don't you start reading them -- drafted in 1949. 1949 comes after 1945, last I heard. Now, HOW MANY TIMES do the Geneva Conventions mention the word "war," you atrociously stupid little man?

  • 17. 0 0
    free palestine
    • tarek
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:33

    Here is another instance of Israels position on the shifting sands of what they regard as truth. Most Israelis appear to be masters at manipulating the facts which provide substance to a situation or political position. They excell at distorting and reshaping truth in a pathetic attempt to justify their transparentcy. Is the rest of the world stupid or is it just that Israel thinks we are? Israel you insult my intelligence with your pathological lies.

  • 16. 76 0
    international law !!!!!
    • Koaqla bears
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:14

    Here is another instance of Israels position on the shifting sands of what they regard as truth. Most Israelis appear to be masters at manipulating the facts which provide substance to a situation or political position. They excell at distorting and reshaping truth in a pathetic attempt to justify their transparentcy. Is the rest of the world stupid or is it just that Israel thinks we are? Israel you insult my intelligence with your pathological lies.

  • 15. 0 44
    Just another chance for Israel to excel
    • Natallie Durson
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:10

    Israel gets a "do over", and another chance to get it right. This is unlikely to have happened if Israel got it right the first time. Consider it a chance to erase the shame of the first debacle.

  • 14. 62 0
    Gabriela - Stop Inflaming the World
    • 23.07.10
    • 04:05

    The only country that is inflamed by the Aid Ship is Israel - let other people live in dignity -give peace a chance. Try something you have never tried before in Israel or the UN.

  • 13. 0 0
  • 12. 59 0
    illegal, racist occupation of Palestine
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:49

    Ambassador Shalev, the world need do nothing! if you just end your illegal, racist occupation of Palestine

  • 11. 0 0
    • 0 0
      @ co2...
      • e l pratt
      • 23.07.10
      • 06:55

      Firefighter's foam is reconstituted beef blood. Are you suggesting that the offering be sprinkled on their boats instead of the altar?

  • 10. 85 0
    Israel at its best
    • jake
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:30

    "Israel reserves its right under international law to use all necessary means to prevent these ships from violating the ... naval blockade." But when international law demands a probe into the killing of 9 civilians in international waters? Well no because we just won’t get a fair hearing. Israel has forfeited any considerations under international law because of its illegal blockade and its murderous criminal actions in international waters. Talk about the yelping of an arrogant obnoxious county.

  • 9. 0 0
  • 8. 70 0
    a pray that their not armed with sticks and chairs
    • gussan
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:11

    cause idf fears sticks and chairs

  • 7. 67 0
    Nope
    • ted heath NZ
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:09

    Wont inflame anything if you just ignore the ships and let them berth at Gaza. It may take a rocket scientist brain to work this out though.

    • 0 0
      Rocket scientists
      • SDHD
      • 23.07.10
      • 04:19

      Unfortunately, some of the Gazan rocket scientists will get their supplies through Gaza ports. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure THAT out. Ever heard of the Karine-A?

    • 0 0
      The Karine a is a joke
      • ben
      • 23.07.10
      • 05:06

      try and google the name of the ship and read the article the strange case of the Karine A It didn't fool Arab countries from day one . weeks later the whole world knew it was a farse . The only ones who were fooled are the brainwashed citizens of the USA. Even Haaratz ran an article on it and the rusty cargo

    • 0 0
      That's the price Israel pays for disengagement, SDHD
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 05:35

      SDHD: "Unfortunately, some of the Gazan rocket scientists will get their supplies through Gaza ports" The lack of IDF troops dock-side is the price Israel pays for "disengaging". Get. Over. It. "Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure THAT out." And that was perfectly forseeable when Sharon decided he was going to "disengage" from Gaza. He made that bed back in 2005, and now Israel has to lie in it. Get. Over. It. "Ever heard of the Karine-A?" Yeah, and it was sailing into Israeli-occupied territory. Now, one more time: **is** Gaza still under an Israeli occupation, or **isn't** it?

    • 0 0
      rocket
      • ted heath NZ
      • 23.07.10
      • 06:11

      Israel has had as many killed by Gaza rockets as New Zealand has by people killed riding wheelie bins down hills. Put it in perspective.

    • 0 0
      Even one is too many, a-hole!
      • The Law
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:36

    • 0 0
      Johnboy, you need to learn the difference between "occupation" and "embargo".
      • flyingdoc57
      • 23.07.10
      • 19:08

      Gaza has not been "occupied" for 5 years. You would do well to learn the difference between "occupation" and "embargo". But, then, if you ever did do so, it would shoot down your whole theory, wouldn't it? There is an embargo of Gaza because of 10,000 rockets fired from that region into Israel. GET. OVER. IT.

    • 0 0
      NZ Genius
      • Rocket Brainless
      • 23.07.10
      • 22:22

      So we must forget about the deaths from rockets fired from Gaza of Dorit Bensain (2), Yuval Abebah (4) Afik Zahari (4), Dana Galkawitz (22) , Ella Abukasis (17) and others because Ted Heath wants to put them in perspective with people killed riding wheelie bins down the New Zealand Hills. Mr. Heath we are overwhelmed by your humanity. You sir support terrorism. One day it will even arrive on the shores of your sad sheep country. Then you can compare your dead children against those killed in wheelie bins.

    • 0 0
      That's the price of firing rockets, dumboy
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:25

      Israel withdrew. Hamas increased rocket fire. Israel retaliates. You're an idiot.

    • 0 0
      Heath's wheelie bins
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:26

      How many schools were closed due to wheelie bins? How many bomb shelters were built due to wheelie bins. How many communities live in fear of rocket fire and have air raid sirens go off due to wheelie bins? Anti-Israelis are morons.

    • 0 0
      flyingdoc57 waves his hands and suddenly...
      • Johnboy
      • 24.07.10
      • 07:06

      ...."Gaza has not been "occupied" for 5 years. " The problem for the doc is that the UN does not agree. "You would do well to learn the difference between 'occupation' and 'embargo'." Perhaps I will, when you explain how a "blockade" is the same thing as an "embargo" After all, those two words do not have the same meaning....

  • 6. 74 0
    israel added passagers of aid ships and farmers to terror list
    • abdalla
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:09

    idf orders shoot to kill

  • 5. 0 0
    Shame on you
    • Rajan
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:06

    Gabriela who is the escalator, why don't you tell extremist government in Israel like Alqaida extremist and Taliban extremist and Iran extremist, that they are the ESCALATOR of crisis in middle east. Gabiela be couragous and tell Liberman and other settler's in the REGIME in Israel when UNO map show people all over the world in different part of the world on UNO poster the SETTLER'S picture on Israel map does not match at all, so does your prime minister and foreign minster. Please tell them don't be Ariel Sharon let us live and let live and make PEACE OF THE BRAVE LIKE RABIN the best prime minister of Israel

  • 4. 43 0
    The List of What is Excluded? Is it Operational Yet?
    • Doug
    • 23.07.10
    • 03:01

    I have heard lots of different stories about what is and what is not allowed into Gaza, but have strangely been unable to find a link of Israel's official list.. Did Israel ever publish such a list? If so, what is the link so I can see what is on the list? When Ashton was visiting a few days ago, she said that she was looking forward to Israel implementing the new rules. Is Israel presently allowing in everything not on the banned list? If so, have they published a Press Release to correct what Ashton said? If not, has Israel ever given any timing for when they will begin allowing everything on the new list?

  • 3. 81 0
    The seiger of Gaza has inflamed the Middle East . . .
    • JRM
    • 23.07.10
    • 02:54

    The flotilla is a humane response to the inhumanity of Israel.

    • 0 46
      The siege is a humane response to rocket attacks
      • SDHD
      • 23.07.10
      • 04:18

      Notice how Israel only went in for a ground incursion once.

    • 41 0
      Nothing humane about the illegal occupation
      • Uncommon American
      • 23.07.10
      • 05:16

      Give me a break. There's absolutely NOTHING at all that's actually humane about one of the most immoral and illegal occupations on the face of the planet.

    • 0 0
    • 0 0
      They did, did they?
      • Johnboy
      • 23.07.10
      • 05:40

      SDHD: "Notice how Israel only went in for a ground incursion once." And would that be Operation Cast Lead, or would that be Operation Summer Rains? Although I do "notice" an Operation Autumn Clouds as well, so is that the "only once" you are babbling on about, rather than the "other two"?

    • 0 0
      and with a 100 to 1 kill ratio
      • Mr. Giggles
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:19

      that's the most humane response i've seen all day.

    • 0 0
      Mr. Giggles have you ever been in a war?
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 11:48

      You don't count the casualities of the enemy your sole mission is to return home alive. I know your likes if you were in place of us be sure you would kill 100 times more. Its sufficient to look at Turkey. Now adays they are killing PKK miltitans silently and no one knows how many PKK Kurds are being killed.

    • 0 0
      Johnboy, I dare you to...
      • Jesse
      • 23.07.10
      • 14:03

      say something about Turkey's occupation of Cyprus, it's killing of Kurds, or its genocide of Armenians... I dare you...

    • 0 0
      Illegal
      • Kan
      • 23.07.10
      • 17:25

      What illegal acquisition of palestinian territory. The borders of PA is not sett. The borders are an matter between Israel and PA. "(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;" What illegal acquisition of Palestinian territory. The borders of PA are not set. The borders are a matter negation between Israel and PA. This means that Israel and Jordan and was called upon to negotiate to set the borders between them. How much of the west Bank should belong to Israel and Jordan.

    • 0 0
      CJ dumdum
      • SDHD
      • 23.07.10
      • 20:59

      Israel withdrew from Gaza, and you call that an acquisition of territory? Moron. The Palestinians just acquired Gaza and started firing rockets.

    • 0 0
      how many?
      • MichaelR
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:14

      How many jews have to be killed before Israel is allowed to respond?The difference between Israel and Hamas is that in Israel appreciate life in this world and Hamas encourages children and youngers to die and find the salvation in the other world.

    • 0 0
      Dumboy
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:24

      Notice Cast Lead was a ground incursion and the others were very tiny operations to close tunnels.

    • 0 0
      Jesse demands that I.....
      • Johnboy
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:58

      "say something about Turkey's occupation of Cyprus," The presence of Turkish soldiers in Norther Cyprus is illegal, and those forces should be withdrawn. "it's killing of Kurds" That is a human rights violation, not a violation of humanitarian law. "or its genocide of Armenians..." that was the Ottoman Empire, Jesse, and has nothing to do with the modern state of Turkey. Would you also like me to condemn Merkel for the nazi slaughter of Jews?

    • 0 0
      Poor SDHD
      • Dobie
      • 24.07.10
      • 09:19

      ...doesn't know what the definition of "occupied" is according to repeated rulings by the UN. It is quite impressive however that armed with a single neuron and a bucket load of personality disorders that he can eek out a few semi intelligible words. He is making progress however and you never know, one day he may find a friend to get busy with.

    • 0 0
      SDHD says.....
      • Johnboy
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:02

      "the others were very tiny operations to close tunnels" Operation Summer Rains involved at least 30,000 IDF soldiers, and lead to 400 Palestinian deaths. Operation Autumn Clouds lasted over a week, and killed at least 50 Palestinians. Those are your idea of a "tiny operation", right?

    • 0 0
      Dippy Dog Dobie
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:34

      definition of "occupied" = Military presence, and/or administrative presence + no administrative presence of local authority. Don't feel sorry for me. You are too stupid to feel sorry for yourself.

    • 0 0
      Tedious dumboy
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 10:53

      We're talking about during the ceasefire, putz.

  • 2. 67 0
    try something else ...
    • cool
    • 23.07.10
    • 02:51

    e.g. lift the blockade this is a campaign for global target groups. "The 'Maryam', an all-female Lebanese aid ship, currently docked in the northern Lebanese port of Tripoli, is getting ready to set sail for Gaza in the next few days. The ship, which aims to break Israel's siege on the Palestinian territory, will carry about 50 aid workers, including some U.S. nuns keen to deliver aid to the long-suffering women and children of Gaza." They took the testoterone out on their side, too .... "We were all drawn to the project...united by a feeling of stark injustice," says Samar Hajj, one of the organisers of the Maryam, which is named after the mother of Christ.

    • 0 0
      Nuns
      • The Teacher/Instruct 23.7.10
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:17

      Just like their Catholic counterparts,where over 70% were found to be Pedophiles,the nuns are not what they seem to be on the outside. I would strongly advise the parents of little boys,not to send their children to the choir in Catholic Churches........... Read about the cases of sexual molestation of those priests,in the USA,GB,Ireland,Germany, & most African countries. Eh ? Dedicating their lives to God........LIARS.

  • 1. 94 0
    Is it not already inflamed?
    • Murat
    • 23.07.10
    • 02:48

    ... like everything is so peaceful and life is so great for all! Israelis did the killing not the other way around. Such kutzpa!

    • 0 76
      Israelis might have done the killing
      • SDHD
      • 23.07.10
      • 04:17

      But the a-holes on that first flotilla threw the first blows.

    • 0 0
    • 0 0
      of those as you say a holes were shot in the head at close range
      • ben
      • 23.07.10
      • 05:32

      In other words they were executed. Israel the master of PR also confiscated all the vidio and released only that which supported their story [ They also stole passports and what do they use stolen passports for] Israel washed the bodies before they were returned to Turkey [ to hide the evidence. Funny we didn't see Isralee PR Photo opt of all those weapons on that ship. Because their were no weapons on that ship just food and medicine. The whole world knows the truth the whole world exept the citizens of the USA . Israel's reasone for the blockade is to force the people of Gaza to overthrow Hamas and to return their solder. Amnesty Int The red cross Beth el ETC ETC ETC have all said there is a humanitary crisis in Gaza THe lies os Israel The 700 clup Fox news ETC ETC arn,t fooling the world

    • 0 0
      Murat Could you answer these questions
      • Aby
      • 23.07.10
      • 08:09

      What Turkey would do if flotillas would sail for Kurds full of ready for dying ? How many Kurds did you killed in the last month? Why did you killed these PKK guys? After answering these qustions. Change the words PKK with HAMAS and Turkey with Israel.Then ask the same questions to you, rewiew the answers. If it would not fit % 100 I don't know nothing.

    • 0 0
      and your proof is what?
      • Mr. Giggles
      • 23.07.10
      • 09:20

      doctored videos from the IDF? still waiting on some credible evidence from the world most moral army.

    • 1 0
      Anyhow. giggle
      • The Teacher/Instruct 23.7.10
      • 23.07.10
      • 11:18

      Israel. By far more moral than the American or British armies. Just a small reminder.to set your brains in the right position. After so much giggling....Haven't you heard what the American army did in MY- Lai ? They massacred everyone in the Vietnamese village,some seven-hundred, men,women & children. They didn't even spare little babies. And then decades later the rape of Iraqi prisoners in Abu-Graeb,Iraq. where dogs & women American soldiers took part in the raping of bound-up Iraqi prisoners. These soldiers sullied the honour of the American army... Now You understand ?something ? Fool

    • 0 0
      CJ Dumdum
      • SDHD
      • 24.07.10
      • 06:24

      Rappelling isn't a blow, moron. Notice no blows were thrown on the other 5 ships.

    • 0 0
      Feeling sorry for you SDHD
      • Dobie
      • 24.07.10
      • 09:06

      With such a limited intellect and to be saddled with full-blown sociopathy deserves nothing less than our sympathy SDHD. "No blows were thrown on the other 5 ships"...is that so? How do you know this little one, did it come to you while your hands were down your pants? If you are caught between the 'pants thing' and prodding the keyboard, why not pursue perfection in the former ? Everyone benefits that way.