Abbas: I won't seek re-election in next Palestinian polls
Palestinian president says he is willing to travel to Gaza to promote reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas and form a united government; 'Elections can't take place if West Bank and Gaza don't unit', he says.
By The Associated Press Tags: Israel news Mahmoud AbbasPalestinian President Mahmoud Abbas announced on Wednesday that he would not seek re-election when polls are held in an expected six months.
In a speech given to political allies, Abbas said that that he is willing to travel to the Gaza Strip to promote reconciliation between his Fatah faction the rival Hamas movement, and form a united government. Hamas welcomed the offer.
"Elections cannot take place if the West Bank and Gaza don't first unite," the Palestinian president said.
On Tuesday, Gaza's prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, had invited Abbas to visit following parallel rallies in Gaza and the West Bank urging the rival Palestinian leaderships to reunite.
The next day, the Palestinian leader announced that he would be prepared to make the trip within the coming week.
"I declare that I am ready to go to Gaza tomorrow so as to end the split and form a new government," Abbas said in a speech before senior members of his Fatah Party.
He urged Haniyeh to make arrangements so he could arrive within the next two to four days, "so we can end this dark and dishonorable chapter of division."
Hamas swiftly welcomed Abbas' offer. Spokesman Taher Nunu said the Hamas government was considering the necessary arrangements for this visit.
Muhammad Al Hindi, a leader of Islamic Jihad, Gaza's other main militant faction, urged the two parties to "translate this good will into practical steps to end the political split and unify our people."
Hamas and Fatah established rival governments in June 2007 after Hamas violently overran Gaza, ridding it of Fatah supporters. Since then, Abbas' Fatah party has controlled only the West Bank, and reconciliation attempts have repeatedly failed.
On Tuesday, a mass grass-roots protest took place in both the West Bank and Gaza, with residents taking to the streets to call for reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah.
The rallies, led by young, disaffected Palestinians, combined with the wave of unrest sweeping through the region, has put heavy pressure on both leaders to resolve their differences.
The rift is a major obstacle to the Palestinians' dreams to establish an independent state incorporating both territories. Paradoxically, perhaps, Abbas' outreach to Hamas might reflect his loss of faith in the U.S.-backed peace process with Israel.
In the past, Abbas has shunned Hamas, which both the U.S. and Israel consider a terror group, in an effort to keep peacemaking alive.
Despite the outward signs of goodwill, the road to reconciliation promises to be rocky - and might lead nowhere. Past reconciliation efforts have failed, with neither side eager to relinquish the power it has.
Last month, Abbas' prime minister, Salam Fayyad, appealed to Hamas to join him in a united government, going so far as to propose that the group retain security control of Gaza until elections. Hamas rejected the offer.
Bringing Hamas back into the Palestinian Authority would likely imperil the huge amounts of American and European aid that the government depends on.
That aid was withheld in the past when Hamas was part of the government because it refused to recognize Israel, renounce its violent campaign against it or accept previous accords between Israel and the Palestinians. There is no sign Hamas would be willing to do any of those things now.
Abbas' plan for unity includes a call for parliamentary and presidential elections within six months. In his speech, Abbas told his Fatah allies that he would not run for re-election in that vote. He had said before he would step down after his current term.
It remains unclear, however, whether the elections will be held. In January, Abbas said he would hold elections by September but he later backpedaled to say elections could not be held until the West Bank and Gaza are reconciled.
Abbas' term expired a year ago, but he had consistently held off scheduling new elections because of turmoil inside Fatah and the growing strength of Hamas in the West Bank.
|
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas |
| Photo by: Reuters |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Don't wait for reelection, GO NOW. you have achieved nothing and made life miserable for Palestinians. Dialogue is for cowards, like you. So just get out of Palestinian lives.
What he really meant "I won't seek the presidential elections of 'Egypt' "
Reconcile now. Organize a 3rd massive, sustained and non violent intifada. Show the true apartheid imperialistic nature of Israel. Disrupt settlement buildings by all means.
Mubarak would never countenance any legitimization of Hamas, even as a junior partner in a unity government. That was the hidden stumbling block, especially as Egypt holds the keys to Rafa.
and Fatah & Hamas reconcile, what then? Will the US and Israel refuse to recognise any government inclusive of what they term as terrorists?
Heading to Geneva to enjoy the blood money he and Arafat have been siphoning over the decades
If anything, Hamas has LOST political strength in Gaza. Elections have been put off because Hamas refuses to allow Gaza to participate for that same reason - although last time there was some infighting in Fatah over potential candidates which also contributed - but Hamas had already made clear that Gaza would not participate. I seriously question the repeated media inferences of Hamas political popularity, which opinion polls consistently show to be nonexistent. Even in Gaza, it trails in popularity almost 2 to 1.
You may be right about Hamas's loss of some popularity, though I doubt if that is on the same scale as Fatah's loss of both face and popularity. But the major reason Hamas refuses elections is its unwillingness to collaborate with Abbas and the Fatah faction.
The key sentence is: "Elections cannot take place if the West Bank and Gaza don't first unite." Is this a wishful thought or an objective observation? Anyhow, supposing he is serious about reconciliation as a first step to free elections, I don’t see how the West can object. They want democracy for all Arabs, don’t they? Clinton has been saying it every time she opens her mouth. So either accept it or stop talking. On another note, I will be exuberant when he steps down. He should take the Fatah faction with him and then I will be truly happy.
ABBASS (SCHLEMEIL) KNOWS HE WILL LOSE TO HAMAS IN ELECTIONS...HE ISN'T NOW THE ELECTED REP (A SHAM), HE KNOWS HAMAS WILL KILL HIM SOONER THAN LATER, HE KNOWS THERE IS A CIVIL WAR COMING AND ANOTHER CAST LEAD OP...AND HE WILL BE THE HAMAS ELECTION POSTER BOY FOR "#1 COLLABORATOR WITH ISRAEL" (A SHAME) ISRAEL FACES AN ARAB WAR ON IT'S DOORSTEP UNLESS IRANT IS STOPPED COLD AND IT'S EVIL THEOCRACY TOPPLED. SHIN BET, IDF, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORKS.
this guy has been more concerned about his personal pride then negotiations for peace... one can only hope that his replacement will actually be serious about peace
Look at every Israeli prime minsiter , their history is full of corruption , indictment after indictment...
Israeli politicians get indictments Pal Politicians get promotions...
The West Bank could ALSO be under siege with its leadership completely ostracized by the international community like Gaza is...but instead it enjoys relative prosperity, international recognition, and has international opinion squarely in its corner...so ummmm, I'll venture to say that Abbas has managed quite well!
His term expired in January 09 and he just kind of held on to the PM post... like all great Arab dictators do...
and if he has any decency left , he should resign and disolve the PA and require Israel to carryout its responsibilities as an occupying power....
Maybe this time it's for good.
Opinion polls indicate that he's still the most popular choice by 2 to 1, even in Gaza!
YEAH RIGHT :D ... six months, my ass
which meant he holds the sincerity towards achieving a final status peace deal with Israel. On both sides we've never had the ideal candidates but evidently with the negotiations between the leaders of the previous government, there was something more promising.
Abbas shows he does not have the slightest understanding about his role. Since 2006 he is suppressing the majority of Pals (well assisted by Israeli army agencies). He is the last one who can achieve reconciliation. The first necessity for reconciliation is that he moves.
...not be better. Believe me, there are much worse options than Abu Mazen. There is going be a great powerstruggle, and the relevance and legitimacy of the PA is at stake, among many other things, of course.
time to go and give a chance for the younger generation to lead
Whatever Abbas offered Israel in private wasn't enough for a deal. How are Palestinians further ahead by getting a leadership that is more demanding than Abbas? Do Palestinians prefer exchanging missiles?
The BAD news: Abbas will not be running for re-election. The GOOD news: No elections are foreseen.// The bad news are indeed bad. Abbas is a relatively very moderate Palestinian leader and potential partner for peace. With him, a peace deal is possible. A potentially similarly good successor is Barghouti, who is now in Israeli jail and Netanyahu would not release him because of his peace potential. On the other hand, Netanyahu will probably will not let Hamas run in elections, at least in Jerusalem, so elections are not likely to take place, and this will keep Abbas around.
how naive. this is the same abbas who co founded fatah the terrorist organisation which is responsible for hundreds of israeli deaths, The same abbas who wrote his thesis on why the holocaust never happened! How can u actually believe that he wants peace with jews!
Well: Once again Israel has messed up and missed out: With Abbas out of the picture, and a reconciliation With Hamas. And wepons being shiped into the region from Iran. Israel: Or more to the point Bibi, should have taken the chance for peace. Now they will have to deal with a much more hostile government. And they (HATE) Jews!
Nope, i would say they HATE the Zionists and Settlers.....
I hope the (West Bank) Palestinians will make a better choice next time at the ballot box (either Fayyad or one of the non-Fatah pro-peace and anti-corruption reformers). You urgently need a leader with a successful strategy and new ideas.....
The Palestinians made a better choice last time they were allowed to vote in free and fair elections. His name was Ismail Haniyya. Only one big problem: the US didn't approve of the free choice of the people. The rest, as they say, is history.
....then the question still remains, whether that Ismail Haniyya would support a fair 2-state solu- tion more or less along the 67 lines or not...???
There has never been an election in "Palestine". There has been an election in Palestinian Territory in 2006.
Hamas has already stated that they would accept a Palestinian state on the 67 borders/
Your "better choice" isn't so popular today...even less so in his Gaza home turf. Clearly, to know him isn't to love him...lol.
The usual practice in democracy is for a candidate to stand for election on a particular platform. If the electorate vote for them, then they bear the consequences of their choice. If the people don't like the platform, he/she won't get elected. What you seem to be implying is that the palestinians should only be able to elect someone whose policies have been vetted and approved by a non-palestinian agency. That is not democracy. That is a sham.