Abbas aides defiant on settlement freeze ahead of Mitchell meet
President Barack Obama's emissary, George Mitchell, is making a secretive last-minute attempt to rescue Mideast peace negotiations
By The Associated Press Tags: Israel news Middle East peace Mahmoud Abbas Barack Obama EUThe Palestinians dug in ahead of a crucial meeting Thursday with Washington's Mideast envoy, saying they can't be expected to continue peace talks unless Israel reverses a decision to lift restrictions on West Bank settlement construction.
|
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas delivers a speech in Paris, France, September 27, 2010 |
| Photo by: AP |
Neither side seems to want the month-old talks to collapse, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas are publicly at an impasse, with a Monday deadline looming.
President Barack Obama's emissary, George Mitchell, is making a secretive last-minute attempt to rescue the negotiations. He was to travel to Abbas' West Bank headquarters Thursday, after meeting with Israeli leaders on Wednesday. Mitchell said after talks with Netanyahu that he is undaunted by what he described as bumps in the road, but offered no glimpse of a possible compromise.
The European Union's top diplomat, Catherine Ashton, announced she's heading to the region "as a matter of priority" after talking to Mitchell and international Mideast envoy Tony Blair.
Starting Thursday, the EU foreign policy chief will meet with Netanyahu, Abbas and Mitchell over two days to try to prevent the collapse of negotiations. She reiterated in a statement that the European Union regrets Israel's decision not to extend a 10-month-old moratorium on West Bank housing starts that expired this week.
Netanyahu has said extending the construction curb could fracture his pro-settlement governing coalition, but has also said he wants to keep negotiating with Abbas. Obama wants a deal on the terms of a Palestinian state alongside Israel within a year.
Abbas advisers on Wednesday stopped short of posing an ultimatum, but signaled they would accept nothing less than an extension of the moratorium. Veteran Palestinian negotiator Nabil Shaath said Israel should be blamed for any breakdown of the negotiations if it insists on expanding settlements on lands claimed by the Palestinians for their state.
Abbas on Wednesday was quoted as saying, without elaborating, that he is ready to make a "historic decision" when Arab League foreign ministers meet Monday in Cairo to review the negotiations. It wasn't clear whether Abbas meant he was ready to quit the talks or whether he was simply trying to create some last-minute leverage.
|
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Jordan, July 26, 2010 |
| Photo by: Reuters |
On Saturday, Abbas will consult top officials from his Fatah Party and the Palestine Liberation Organization's decision-making body before sitting down with the Arab officials.
Hanna Amireh, a member of the PLO body, said there was widespread opposition to resuming talks without a settlement curb.
"The consensus is that since the entire world is in favor of a Palestinian state and against settlements, then let us throw this problem in the face of the world and see what they can do about it," Amireh said.
However, in the end the decision is up to Abbas. Fatah and the PLO have routinely backed his decisions in the past and are unlikely to rebel against him now. The Arab League is also expected to back Abbas' recommendations.
Should he stay in the talks without a moratorium, Abbas would lose more credibility among Palestinians already skeptical of Washington's ability to deliver a deal. Yet Abbas may be reluctant to walk away from talks because his international standing and future as a leader are tied to the quest for a peace deal.
Abbas' bitter Hamas rivals, who seized control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, would benefit from the talks' failure as a reflection of their position that nothing can be gained by negotiating with Israel.
In comments published Wednesday on the website of the pro-Hamas newspaper Felesteen, Hamas' Gaza strongman Mahmoud Zahar renewed his call to Abbas to quit the negotiations.
Commenting on the Palestinian uprising that followed the failed U.S.-led peace effort at Camp David in 2000, Zahar claimed the late Palestinian President Yasser Arafat instructed Hamas to carry out "a number of military operations in the heart of the Hebrew state" after he allegedly "felt the failure of his negotiating" with Israel.
At the time, Arafat had said he sought to restrain Palestinian attacks so peace talks could succeed.
Zahar and other Hamas spokesmen could not immediately be reached for comment.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
What is wrong with you, buddy? My blog's comments were not moderated for over 12 hours, and likewise other opinion pieces. I am getting annoyed with this. Do your job, and don't forget our guests Benny Morris and Carlo Strenger. And our regular columnists also deserve some attention!
The immediate effect will be some violence, a third Intifada, which the Israeli military estimates will be not as bad as the previous one. But this estimate does not take the political effects into account. Clearly, Abbas will be weakened and lose prestige with his people, while Hamas will be "proven" to have been "correct" in their negative attitude. 1. The result may very well be a reconciliation between Hamas and the PA and an independent declaration of a Palestinian state, with new elections in which Abbas will not participate. I doubt that the US will veto admittance of this state to the UN. From there it will cause endless diplomatic trouble to Israel. 2. Another possibility is that Abbas will simply retire. By law, his temporary successor is the speaker of Parliament, a Hamasnik. 3. Alternatively to point #2, but perhaps leading to the same outcome, is that the PA will dissolve itself, forcing Israel to exercise direct control over the West Bank. No more donations from the world, the financial burden will fall on Israel, as well as the stigma of Apartheid. Not pretty.
It is about consolidating the nation of Israel and returning the arabs to their homelands. The irrational left has it in for the nation of Israel. They are hell-bent on destroying both what the UN itself and God Almighty have proclaimed to the world; that there is a place for the Jews and it is within the borders of their old homeland of Israel.
Any fool could see this charade of peace talks end in failure. The US and EU have never done anything for the peace process other than support the Israeli position on occupation and settler enterprise, like the Israeli sycophants they are.
But what a fool believes he sees No wise man has the power to reason away What seems to be Is always better than nothing And nothing at all... Keeps sending him somewhere ... Where he can still believe there's a place ... Someday, somewhere, she will return But what a fool believes he sees No wise man has the power to reason away
“Yet Abbas may be reluctant to walk away from talks because his international standing and future as a leader are tied to the quest for a peace deal”. This is questionable since Abbas is 75 and has already attempted to retire. Domestic political expediency is certainly present in these negotiations but not so much from him.
Overwhelming consensus to be more accurate. So Abbas try seeing beyond that tiny tip of your nose. Activities in the settlements have very little if any bearing on the borders of the future Palestinian state. Replay one thought a hundred times or more if convincing is needed. Settlements are illegal.
abass will be in bibi's trap
But if you want to have a meaningful peace, BOTH sides need to make meaningful gestures. Israel imposed a 10 month settlement freeze in Judea/Samaria. What have the Palestinians done? Absolutely nothing except engage in "peace" talks. The PA won't even accept the notion of "two states for two people." And Hamas won't even recognize Israel. The Palestinians are delusional if they think that they can have peace without making a few concessions.
Hopefully Abbas will not proudly try to fill Arafat's sandals as if there was any legacy left there to be proud of. Poor Amireh is weary and feeling faint and throwing the issues of settlements and a PA State to the world to solve as if they have no more problems of their own and they have lots of spare time on their hands. Wait till he tries and saddles them with the most important and weighty issue of them all, the status of Jerusalem talks!
Overwhelming consensus to be more accurate. So Abbas try seeing beyond that tiny tip of your nose. Activities in the settlements have very little if any bearing on the borders of the future Palestinian state. Replay one thought a hundred times or more if convincing is needed. Settlements are illegal.
Why did the pals wait for the end of the 10mnth freeze before coming to the negotiating table. Because THEY wanted the talks to fail.
now after one month and a few days worth of talks Israel is supposed to just extend it. Just talk and if it is agreed to give back some additional land then so be it.
The Palestinians have set up a situation where they waited until the clock ran down to the last minute and now they hope international pressure will force Israel to back down and win them the upper hand in the negotiations. It's a fairly obvious ploy, and so far Bibi isn't buying it. If he sticks to his position, as I expect he will, then the Palestinians will be at a disadvantage if they continue the talks. Abbas has set up a winner-take-all confrontation at the very beginning of the talks.
I am against settlements however i am also against preconditions. Abbas should negotiate without conditions. Settlement issue should be resolved during the negotiation not before.
The consensus is that the entire world is in favor of a Palestinian state. but not all the Pals, and not the ISraeli Arabs. Not Jordan either nor any of the other Arab countries, except maybe Syria.
Israel won't and Palestine can't.
Abbas and his gang are looking for a quick permanent "exit". Israel should be ready to dismantle the PA, if they violate the Oslo accord. The tacit assumption of Oslo was "direct negotiations".
Israel has Arabs. Palestine can have Jews. It's the same thing. End of issue.
the positions had been staked long before the 'Talks' started: netanyahu announced that the 'Freeze' will not continue, and Abbas responded that the talks will falter once the settlement rebuilding restarts. That's why the cynics predicted the failure of the talks. Obama should not have expected anything different. The US President must acknowledge that there is no parity between Occupier and Occupied. The onus cannot be on the Palestinians.
Listen Obama. After you assumed office, you pressed Israel on stopping settlement construction. This had nothing to do with Abbas or the Palestinians. You did it because you thought it was the right thing to do. Abbas has said all along that he would walk away from peace talks if construction was resumed. Are you now trying to pressure Abbas into giving up on the topic of settlement growth just as you did. Is Israel really so strong that you cannot even get an extension? Do our billions a year buy us no cooperation from Israel? Do you still think that Israel should stop settlement construction? These are questions we need answered in order to help us make election decisions. Please get back to me.
Yup, that is why it is on Haaretz....
...than a complete halt to settlements in the WB. Allowing selective settlement building amounts to a de facto concession on borders before negotiations even get started!
His condition couldn't be fairer. Twist Netanyahu's arm, Obama & Ashton, and do it for the entire world. Later on, you'll have to do the same with the Palestinians, when they grow stronger and instead of trying to reconcile with a terrorist organization, they will need all the help in the world to uproot and defeat Hamas in Gaza.
and Abbas,dont let the door hit you in the ass on your way out..The nerve of them to make demands.They have given nothing but taken land through the years.They dont want peace,they want NO ISRAEL....
"Netanyahu has said extending the construction curb could fracture his pro-settlement governing coalition," ...... It is entirely fractured already, becoming totally ridiculous. This "government" is finished....unless we will permit it to destroy our country.
Who's willing is stronger, the Settlers have a great thing going so why give it up, unless US/EU makes it too costly for the rest of Israel to continue to back them.
The message sent by Netanyahu is quite clear. No peace, no way.
So, if he wants a Palestinian state, he should get on with the talks and work toward setting borders. No amount of building will make any difference once that is accomplished. Otherwise, he can just go home, let Hamas claim victory not only over the Israelis, but over Abbas and the PA as well.
you will windup like Arafat and the ones that suffer are the people. Abbas has no choice but to negotiate, building or no building.
What is there to talk about if Israel keeps taking land? Palestinians should unilaterally declare a state.
maybe he can keep his murderers from killing people too, more than fair
abbas is golem
Long before the talks began, Abbas swore he would walk if construction resumed. Both Obama and Netanyahu pushed him into talks saying everything would be OK. Now construction has resumed and Abbas says he will walk. No surprise, right? Obama learned last year that he cannot push Israel. Perish the thought! To make up for this, he assumed that he could push the pliable Abbas twice as hard. The problem for Obama is that when he allowed himself to be bi***slapped by Israel, he lost all credibility in the world as well as his cajones. Not even the pliable Abbas will be bossed around by such a person.
Israel's "easy" history: Holocaust, barely obtaining UN resolution, embargo for paid weapons by Europe, simultaneous attack by Arab states. Yes, some guys really have it all...
This is about assuring a governable Palestine. Anything less is vulnerable to Israeli intrusion and fragmentation. Abbas is not a fool to be lured into a trap that will enhance the illegal claims of Israel's settlements. The vast majority of Western support Abbas. The UN supports the Palestinians. It is time for Israel to awaken from its fantasy. Unfortunately the irrational zealots will not let it.
Israel had shown historically that it can dismantle any settlements of needed (e.g Yamit in Sinai or in Gaza). The issue is not settlements, but the fact that the Palestinians are not interested in their state. They are interested perhaps in thousands of other things - like dismantling Israel, flooding Israel with millions of Arab refugees, etc. But in spite of all Israeli consessions made by Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert and now Netanyahu with the freeze, they still either refuse from actual concrete proposal or have to be dragged to the negotiations. If you would ask someone like the Kurds whether they would like to negotiate their own state, I don't think they would be dragged to the negotiations! THey would be jumping on it straight away!
Forget the charade. Have one country and let all the original inhabitants return to their lands. A true democracy with all people represented. Arabs & Jews. Put the money spend on weapons into building a strong and viable country. Israel/Palestine.
Forget the charade. Have one country and let all the original inhabitants return to their lands. A true democracy with all people represented. Arabs & Jews. Put the money spend on weapons into building a strong and viable country. Israel/Palestine.