A double-barreled solution to Iran

a rocket assault Israel could not endure. every few months there is a flurry of righist threats that only further isolates israel and makes it hard to have any policy. Attacking Iran would lead to Holocaust II.

It is looking increasingly likely that we will hav eto re-coccupy Sinai.

what drived israel,first,to acquire nuclear???the threat of her exis- tence as a jewish states from her implacable adversaries that sur-rounds her with quantitative superiority. israel does not threatened anyone countries' existence, its nuclear is for deterrent and wea- pon of last resort only

it is well known that iran is sponsoring a lot of terrorist groups. if allowed to have that bomb then the implication is so simple.......every group can posses that desirable toys........so simple for a small group to subject a government or a country to blackmail, aside from the potential mushroom of backyard proliferation and potential horrendous implications.

despite the total lack of any hard evience whatsoever that Iran actually has such a program. It's almost as though the US and Israel want Iran to have a weapon just to provide them with an excuse to attack.

Professor Dror seems to have lost his mind, or the ability to distinguish truth from propaganda. What is the evicence that Iran seeks a nuclear weapon, other then his imagination. The answer is, no evidence exists.

Israel is allowed to do anything, including killing people and stealing their land. Israel's victims are not allowed to do anything in their own defense without being labeled "terrorists".

The logic has some gaps. First, how does a regional peace initiative, which may succeed or fail, even if it succeeds, prevent Iran from becoming a vengeful nuclear power? Second, Dror says, "If I knew" that Iran would become a vengeful nuclear power he would not recommend a strike. But what happened to probabilities? Why does he have to know this? Why is it not a sufficient counter argument that there is a high probability of this outcome? And what happened to the pseudo image of careful calculation? Exactly how low does this outcome have to be for Dror's analysis to stand? Of course no one can say, so let's drop the pretense that there stands some exact rational calculus behind such opinions. Right now Iran seems to be seeking nuclear capability not possession of armed missiles. Is the probability that it will have nuclear weapons five years from now greater or less, if Israel launches an attack? Does anyone really know?

And make friends with the police. So simple!

Your glib analysis that Israel's nuclear weapons is the reason for Iran's quest is so patently false that only an anti-Semite would think it reasonable. Yes, blame The Jews. Is it Israeli nukes that are now causing Saudi Arabia, and perhaps the Emirates to consider going nuclear too?

think about that one.

Has the author every thought about the reason Iran is getting nukes is because Israel has them? So really if you rid middle east of Israel's nukes then there will be no nuclear weapons in middle east and Iran will have no reason to acquire them. The reason there nuclear proliferation in middle east is Israel not Iran

Us and Israel must stop Iran

finally some one says it as it is the only problem is,its a little to little a little to late.where were you mr Yehezkel Dror all this time?