• Published 08:24 27.12.09
  • Latest update 13:00 27.12.09

Despite U.S. rap, Netanyahu says IDF will keep 'aggressively' defending Israelis

Police: IDF snatched gun used to kill Israeli; U.S.: Explain killing of militants following attack.

By Barak Ravid Tags: Barack Obama Israel news

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed on Sunday that the Israel Defense Forces would respond to every assault on Israelis, one day after undercover commandos killed three Fatah militants behind a terror attack last week, an operation which prompted a request for clarification from the White House.

"We'll continue to defend aggressively and respond to every attack against Israeli citizens and every rocket strike," the prime minister said.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades operatives killed in Nablus on Saturday were suspected of shooting 45-year-old Rabbi Meir Hai to death in an attack on his car in the northern West Bank on Thursday.

Police said Sunday, meanwhile, that one of the weapons confiscated by IDF troops during the operation had been used to shoot Rabbi Hai, a resident of a West Bank settlement. Police took the weapons to a criminal identification lab for a ballistics check.

The dead militants are Raad Sarkaji, 38, a Tanzim activist formerly of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades in the Nablus area, who was arrested in 2002 and released at the beginning of this year; Ghassan Abu Shreikh, 40, who was also a former prisoner in Israel, and Adnan Subuh, 33. Security officials said Subuh had four weapons and a hoard of ammunition when he was killed.

U.S. to Israel: Explain killing of Fatah militants

Senior Obama administration officials requested on Saturday that National Security Adviser Uzi Arad explain the IDF raid in Nablus.

Arad shared intelligence with the officials that Israel had received about the militants, who belonged to the military wing of the Western-backed Fatah movement, and the details of the operation on Saturday that led to their deaths.

The national security advisor, a key aide to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stressed that this was a case of self-defense, since the three were behind a terror attack on Thursday.

Israeli political sources said the Obama administration did not formally protest or complain about the incident, but only sought clarifications, passing on the Palestinians' complaint.

A senior U.S. official told Haaretz that the United States had attempted to calm both Israel and the Palestinian authority in the wake of the events. "We talked to both sides in order to get full information about what happened," he said. "We expressed our concern and encouraged both sides to continue their security cooperation."

The PA on Saturday complained to the U.S. that during the raid Israel had unjustly invaded area A, for whose security the Palestinians are solely responsible. The PA demanded that the Americans voice their own position on the matter.

Over the weekend, the Palestinians also protested to the coordinator of government activities in the territories, Maj. Gen. Eitan Dangot, that IDF soldiers had entered area A in Nablus and had not allowed PA security forces to arrest the wanted men.

Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terrorists killed in IDF raid.

Photo by: (AP)
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 74. 0 0
    Repeat after me: The only democracy in the Middle East
    • Antonius
    • 31.12.09
    • 19:12

    Extrajudicial killings on a routine basis. This is democracy? Israel needs to stop intoning this tired old fiction.

  • 73. 0 0
    killing of miliants
    • connie
    • 31.12.09
    • 00:01

    what is there to be explained? Criminal should be put to death, in Israel or USA, what does obama know?

  • 72. 0 0
    # 46
    • Universal citizan
    • 29.12.09
    • 22:14

    Appreciate the honesty. Do you support israel policy ?

  • 71. 0 0
    # 23 "Humble Jew"
    • Elmer
    • 29.12.09
    • 19:30

    I think you will find that a greater number of Americans Citizens voted for President Obama than "Majority of American Jews" You take to much credit!!

  • 70. 0 0
    aggression
    • M
    • 28.12.09
    • 19:59

    many people do not realize that the level of arab aggression is also a determining factor in what goes on in israel. they also overestimate the abilities of israel to "enforce the law". The law does not apply in the west bank because the people there do not believe in it, at least the same laws that we believe in. If murder is not condemned if done for a reason then we should be arguing about the reasons and not about who did what to whom.

  • 69. 0 0
    To Palestinian Brit end of games hunting season is started again
    • Dani
    • 28.12.09
    • 17:00

    Game over every time you play "throwing the stone and hide the hand" this is not working anymore. Every time your people is going to attack Israel they will receive back "disproportionate" response. If like play with our civilians you know that we have an army that will defend them Enjoy your medicine.

  • 68. 0 0
    brad 56
    • potobac
    • 28.12.09
    • 16:35

    It is true the money is spent in the US. However if we spent it on infrastructure instead of sending it to Israel, it would still be spent in the US and we would wind up very far ahead in terms of benefit to us.

  • 67. 0 0
    Those three ethnic cleansers had a fair trial
    • Meo
    • 28.12.09
    • 15:30

    They had a military trial,were judged for their previous crimes,crimes against humanity,war crimes,found guilty,condemned to death and executed with the respect for their military past.With bullets. So where is the problem?Can't live with the fact that they won't kill any civilian anymore?

  • 66. 0 0
    A Trial is Required
    • A Seeker of Justice
    • 28.12.09
    • 14:46

    Kudos to those who demand that Israel put all militants on trial. But they don't go far enough! This principle should be applied to every war. No soldier should be permitted to try to kill any other soldier, even during a fire fight, unless that other soldier had been found guilty--of being a soldier on the other side I presume--by a fair and open trial.

  • 65. 0 0
    Preempting war, anyone?
    • John Spear
    • 28.12.09
    • 10:16

    Is that the Bush doctrine? the Netanyahu doctrine?

  • 64. 0 0
    Explain..
    • Ernie P.
    • 28.12.09
    • 08:24

    Bibi please tell Obama you will call him back shortly to explain fully,, like in three years...

  • 63. 0 0
    HAS White House asked Fatah claification of the murder of unarmed
    • PETER SM
    • 28.12.09
    • 08:16

    Rabbi Hai? Another hudna,Fatah style.!

  • 62. 0 0
    COULD USA explain killing of Taliban"militants"&the assosciated
    • PETER SM
    • 28.12.09
    • 08:11

    civillian casualties.? Ditto for all the forces present in Afghanistan.

  • 61. 0 0
    Aaron: How silly
    • Brad
    • 28.12.09
    • 06:27

    How do any police who corner what they think is a murderer know what they think is right? All they can do is pursue those they think responsible, ask them to give themselves up and if there is a refusal to give up, then use force. Where the suspicion is that the culprits are murderers, lethal force is warranted and used throughout the world. What's missing in your analysis is that these Pal thugs did not give the settler any opportunity to defend himself for his terrible sin, according to these thugs, of trespass.

  • 60. 0 0
    Tax Payer $
    • Brad
    • 28.12.09
    • 06:22

    Its pretty significant, about $3 B. However, almost all of that is spent in the U.S. and benefits U.S. suppliers. Its far less significant than most anti-Israeli's make out, especially in light of Israel's booming economy mostly spawned by intellectual property. And the big beneficiary of that intellectual property is the U.S.

  • 59. 0 0
    Palestinian Brit: Your full of it
    • Brad
    • 28.12.09
    • 06:13

    Everyear in the U.S. there are many criminals who refuse to come out of a hidehout or house and ultimately get killed BEFORE THEY CAN FACE A JUSTICE SYSTEM. Not only in the states but throughout the world. Nothing more and nothing less happened in the case you complain about. But much less happened when these three delusional thugs killed the settler. There was no opportunity for him to defend what you say is his big crime, one deserving death, of trespass.

  • 58. 0 0
    Steven: Chicago
    • Brad
    • 28.12.09
    • 06:10

    At least Israel gave them an opportunity to face a justice system. That is far more than they gave the settler.

  • 57. 0 0
    # 46--Chet--I am NOT unbiased...
    • US CITIZEN
    • 28.12.09
    • 02:30

    Chet, Like most of my colleagues here in Washington, I am a strong supporter of Israel. I am in no way an unbiased observer. I am, and will always be, a vigorous advocate for the only Jewish state on the planet. Best wishes to you!

  • 56. 0 0
    #27;new-york-loner, and false facts
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 28.12.09
    • 01:57

    nyl:"A militant Rabbi is killed" Where did you get the adjective "militant", while this makes great propaganda nowhere was it stated that he is/was militant. nyl:"identified the killers" How ominous? Remember the Malvo case here in the U.S. we just executed his accomplice about two weeks ago. nyl:"boldly assassinated them with impunity" Actually they could have surrendered but chose not to. nyl:"confirming ballistics test on a confiscated weapon" Exactly, in the original article pictures of the confiscated weapons were shown. Ballistic testing was positive. So what your problem? Why present the facts as if conspiracy, one that you simply don't prove. Instead you use adjectives to create the false and unprovable implication of a conspiracy.

  • 55. 0 0
    BALLISTICS MATCH CASE CLOSED
    • Detroit
    • 28.12.09
    • 01:12

    So that ends that. Now of course the anti-Israel writers again will protest. If the gloves fits you must not acquit. Case closed, Guilty as charged.

  • 54. 0 0
    Ok, so they killed these militants but the weapons are being sent
    • Albert
    • 28.12.09
    • 00:46

    Israel is not being clear as to how they identified these three subjects as the perpetrators in the shooting of the settler. I mean if they are the perpetrators then do what you have to do. However, you kill someone who didn't pose a threat to the soldiers and then you send his weapon into the crime lab for ballistic testing and identification? Sounds like Israel has a policy of executing suspects before being found guilty. If that is so, it surely denies her the right of being a just nation.

  • 53. 0 0
    White House demands explanation
    • norman a blumberg
    • 28.12.09
    • 00:01

    It would be far more appropriate if the White House demanded an immediate clarification from the Abbas stooge of why the Rabbi was murdered. I don't believe he was firing from a rifle when attacked.

  • 52. 0 0
    Doron and the Others, You Convinced Me
    • Binyamin
    • 27.12.09
    • 23:50

    Your posts help show why the U.S. wars in the Mid-East have served the interests of Israel and not my country. Zionism has been at war with the Palestinians for a hundred years. Israeli pulic opinion shows not the slightest inclination to change that situation. When Netanyahu says he wants peace, what he (and you) mean is surrender. The pro-Israel lobby in my country has succeeded in drawing our righteous democracy into defending your apartheid state. Doubtless you now want us to make war on your behalf against Iran. At some point, the American people are going to wake up to the lies they have been fed. When that day comes, take to your fox hole.

  • 51. 0 0
    Well done IDF for correct action
    • Lily
    • 27.12.09
    • 23:39

    Israel must do what it deems to be correct action to defend itself against terror. The vulnerable Rabbi had no chance against the group of cowardly terrorists. How dare USA ask for explanation when the IDF roots out the culprits. Has it gone mad? Israel please treat this with the contempt it deserves. Stand strong, you have millions of supporters all over the world, east west north and south. You are the world's silent hope against the relentless tyranny of the terrorists.

  • 50. 0 0
    guilty or not, this was NOT justice; it was a "hit"
    • eric
    • 27.12.09
    • 22:39

    if all of you believe that israel's use of hit squads against "suspects" who have been implicated by "hearsay"(the ONLY way these guys could have been identified as the perpetrators), is "justice"; then you've got no room to criticize any of the worlds most repressive regimes, including the nazis, for their extrajudicial methods. "dead men tell no tales"...right guys? and israeli justice is "swift"...right guys? and everyone can breathe easier because they "know" the killers are dead...right guys? right? we "know" they're dead...right? cuz israeli "justice" is swift when it comes to palestinians...right guys? it makes bibi look good, too...right guys? and no one's alive to say otherwise...right guys? oh, and by the way, a weapon that "one" of the men had(the only one to have any weapons), was "found" to be the one used in the killing. nothing like having forensic evidence "after the fact"...right guys? and of course, "nobody" doubts the integrity of israeli security forces not to cover their tracks...right guys? they have a proven record of that...right guys? but were they the "right guys"? none of you know...and none of you care...right guys? the euphoria your posts exhibit is not for justice; it's for vengeance...right guys? maybe you don't see that...but everyone else CAN... and how DARE the u.s. question israel's use of "hit squads" to carry out "justice"...right guys? (psssst!...even iran at least puts on a show trial before executing "suspects")

  • 49. 0 0
    not acceptable: good description ...
    • Jasper
    • 27.12.09
    • 20:59

    ... of your post. The spent casings have a distinctive dent on the primer, and abrasive longitudinal marks along the sides. Traceable to a particular weapon. You are right, however, that the bullet itself bears marks tracable to a particular weapon.

  • 48. 0 0
    2012
    • Skullivan
    • 27.12.09
    • 20:28

    For all those wishing to see Obama out in 2012, keep it up, you'll probably get your wish. Minor problem, by then there will have passed 4 years during which the perception of Israel's activities had been seen for what they are by the world and half the US and there is no chance that the world will go back to looking the other way when it comes to occupation brutality and Israeli lack of democracy. In fact I believe that the next president will be twice the tyrant Bush and an even more ardent Israeli supporter was which is what is going to take to tip the world over the edge and US will be openly isolated. So keep on egging on Tyranny Israelis, eventually you will succeed and all you will have to back you is a diminishing old Giant in a world of growing young stronger giants.

  • 47. 0 0
    My dream
    • Dan
    • 27.12.09
    • 20:25

    My dream is not a "2 state solution" but to tell the US to keep their money and to mind their own business!

  • 46. 0 0
    For #43 - US Citizen - Haaretz Answers Your Questions
    • chet
    • 27.12.09
    • 20:21

    As to the Nablus men being unarmed and offering no resistance, please see: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1137753.html Of course, being the unbiased observer that you obviously are, you will question the accuracy of the B'Tselem investigation.

  • 45. 0 0
    #40 No Justice without trial
    • Steven
    • 27.12.09
    • 20:18

    For all we know, the person who tipped the IDF may have planted the gun on these 3's premises in order to get rid of them. The Tipster may even have been the perpetrator who is walking clean to kill another settlor. Or the IDF itself may have planted the evidence to cover the assination. Afte all, we read a few days ago that the Israeli Forensics Institute harvested body parts without families' consents, so we are not dealing with Mother Teresea types. Or perhaps they were indeed guilty, but a fair and impartial trial is the only way to seek justice; but there has to be a willing government. Now we will never know the truth. The truth is just what the IDF says now. See the danger.

  • 44. 0 0
    #42--Chet
    • US CITIZEN
    • 27.12.09
    • 19:44

    Hi Chet--Just wondering how you know these killers who were found with the guns they committed the murder of an innocent father of 7 children with "offerred no resistance"? In my opinion, Israel acted properly in this case. They are a tiny country sournded by hostiles. Deterance is a major facotor in their defense strategy. Those who would do harm to Israelis must be put on notice that there will be consequences.

  • 43. 0 0
    US Seeks Clarification Because The Israeli Reports Are Specious
    • chet
    • 27.12.09
    • 19:28

    First, as to the US right to question - Israel receives $3B a year from the US as well as the protection of the US veto in the UNSC. Without this support, would Israel have survived over the past sixty years? As to the "clarification" - the Israeli reasons for the killings of the three Palestinians are clearly bogus as they were unarmed and offered no resistance. If this was not extra-judicial murder, as it appears to be, the US needs clarity if it is called upon to defend Israel's actions.

  • 42. 0 0
    IDF Actions Do Not Bear Investigation.
    • Reader
    • 27.12.09
    • 19:22

    Several versions of these "arrests" are available. Many people have noted IDF-"Settler" collusion in land theft. Many more have become sceptical of IDF accounts since Cast Lead and the stone-walling of Goldstone. It's just too convenient for the IDF that their inability to properly arrest these three suspects from three separate homes at that time of night will not be subject to court review.

  • 41. 0 0
    Joseph .E they matched the spent shells? to funny
    • not aceptable
    • 27.12.09
    • 19:12

    it is the bullet not the spent shell that match that makes a case NOT spent shell casing....spent shell casing from that rifle all look the same...you are grabing at straws

  • 40. 0 0
    These actions were completely justified
    • Charles Goldberg
    • 27.12.09
    • 19:03

    Everyone's saying they had no chance to defend themselves which is ridiculous. The Israelis fairly and justly gave them all the warning they needed. They did not surrender and they paid the consequences. What is so inhumane? Police in America shoot people who run away from them. It shouldn't be different in Israel. Palestinians need to cooperate with the IDF or face the consequences. Plus, these people are proven to be terrorists. Their guns matched the ballistics test from the bullets used to murder the innocent Rabbi. I wonder if these other people even bothered reading the whole article.

  • 39. 0 0
    Facts on the ground contradict P.M. statement.
    • Joseph .E
    • 27.12.09
    • 19:00

    P.M. populist statement is for medias and not for public consumption . While at Abu Mazzen urging , P.M. fight Hamas , P.M. fail to keep the tab against Abu Mazzen suicidal military Al Aqsa brigades . In return for medias consumption, medias cover P.M. fatal mistakes saying 'isolated incident'. Israel's gestures and roadblocks removal enable freedom of movement to terrorists and more arab terror .

  • 38. 0 0
    Before Israel forgets, why the US deserves clarification
    • American
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:55

    OK, the US gives billions of dollars of aid a year to Israel. I think it's silly for nationalists on the Israeli side to complain about America's involvement in their affairs while taking American money. If you DONT want to answer questions about what you do with the money of US taxpayers, don't recieve it.

  • 37. 0 0
    Horowitz
    • Jasper
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:47

    What you say is true for countries of laws. However, the WB is not a country of laws. It is more like the American West of the late 1800s. Essentially the law is established by whoever is the best shot. Everyone including you rejoiced when the Rabbi was shot. The Brigades bragged, Abbas approved. But if the rabbi was your own brother, you would have grabbed a rifle, stormed into town, and did the deed yourself. Maybe when Abbas gets off his arse, sits down and establishes his state, there can be law and order in the WB.

  • 36. 0 0
    Inocent till proven guilty
    • Justitia
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:44

    it seems due processes and fair trials are something unnkown in Israel, especially when it comes to Palestinians!!! The declaration of Netanyahu is similar to announcements of former Iraqi President Sadam against the Kurds... BRAVO Netanyahu, welcome in the club of politicians that history will remember as racists...

  • 35. 0 0
    # 10 & #18 Condolences
    • Steven
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:40

    #10 & #18 my Condolences to the victims.

  • 34. 0 0
    USA arrogance
    • Rigoletto
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:27

    The USA should put their act together at home first, where they have a hell of a lot to do. Somehow I missed the request from the USA about a clarification about last week killing in the West Bank of an innocent driver? Arrogance comes befor the fall!!

  • 33. 0 0
    Rifle seized in Nablus raid linked to settler's murder
    • Joseph .E
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:23

    Police say M-16 belonging to terrorist killed during IDF operation Saturday matches shells found at scene of Rabbi Meir Avshalom Hai's murder. The police forensics lab determined that one of the rifles seized from the Palestinian terrorists who were killed in Shckhem (Nablus) Saturday was used in last week's murder of Jewish settler Rabbi Meir Avshalom Hai in the West Bank. The M-16 rifle, which belonged to Tanzim member Anan Sabah, was found to be compatible with the bullet shells found at the scene of Hai-s murder. Sabah had been released from an Israeli prison as part of the amnesty deal with the Palestinian Authority in 2007, in which Israel agreed not to hunt down Palestinian gunmen who agreed to lay down their arms. "No two weapons leave the same indentation on the ammunition," a police official said Sunday. The lab test results are admissible in court. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3825733,00.html

  • 32. 0 0
    Killing of militants.
    • sandra chitayat
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:13

    Well, perhaps it would have been better had they allowed the Palestinians to arrest them, as one did turn himself in to the Palestinian authorities. Are they going to bother to do a DNA check if truly their fingerprints were on the weapons? If the PA is truly responsible, how is it that these Fatah affiliated militants who were responsible for the second intifada managed to kill Meir Hai,z"l? Israel was not going to wait around for all these questions to be answered, as Obama and the U.S. do not wait around in their aggressive campaigns, as posters have mentioned.

  • 31. 0 0
    Enough with this aid talk
    • TOMY
    • 27.12.09
    • 18:01

    The aid money comes back into American economy , while Israel is in a front line in defending American and the free worlds interests in the ME for decades . The crams , of what many call money, is well spent . It is just a big BS giving some a dead horse to jump on .

  • 30. 0 0
    an arrest is no trial and cannot be denied
    • schmid
    • 27.12.09
    • 17:57

    In a lawful state you cannot resist an arrest. The right to defence, a lawyer, etc. applies to a trial, which is to be held after the arrest. If you resist an arrest, and are armed, expect bad things to happen.

  • 29. 0 0
    humble jew 23
    • potobac
    • 27.12.09
    • 17:43

    One would hope you voted for him to do what is best for the US. If that involves hurting Israel, what's wrong with that (if it's good for us)?

  • 28. 0 0
    Does not sound like pa is all that upset
    • Dave duncan
    • 27.12.09
    • 17:28

    But why can't Israel throw the pa a bone. Acknowledge their efforts. Say all violence against civilian will be dealt with harshly. It's not just israelis getting pummeled. The "price tag" policy has yet to be called by Israel for what it is--"terror". When that happens there will be more sympathy for Israel.

  • 27. 0 0
    Death Squads & Democracy
    • new_york_loner
    • 27.12.09
    • 16:12

    Let's review the facts - A militant Rabbi is killed on Thursday. By the following Saturday, the Israeli authorities have not only identified the killers, but have boldly assassinated them with impunity, run a confirming ballistics test on a confiscated weapon and are already being absolved of any culpability by the USA. This is not how law-abiding democracies are supposed to operate in the 21st century. This is faith-based martial law. The murder of the three suspects were summary executions. This is not democracy, nor the rule of law, this is extra-judicial vendetta and the law of the jungle. Bibi keeps the fear level high and the hate level even higher, without the "justified" antipathy, he is nothing, and he knows it. This self-serving demagogue may lead Israel to absolute ruination, the trajectory seems about right. Shalom!

  • 26. 0 0
    isreal calls everybody a terrorist then turns them into terrorist
    • abdalla
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:46

    why was the guy in jail for seven years then released maybe he was locked up for no reason and wanted revenge

  • 25. 0 0
    re#20 Jay
    • Aaron
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:36

    How do you know that they refused to be arrested or were even the actual murderers of the rabbi Jay in light of the fact they were shot at point blank unarmed withouta trial? Israel is becoming a perfect replica of all other states in the Middle East a theocratic state with no rule of law. This is why there will never be mass aliyah of US Jews, they know that Israel is no United States.

  • 24. 0 0
    Palestinian Brit,who sentenced Rabbi Meir Hai to death and when?
    • Meo
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:33

    I thought your answer would be apropriate when I see you frustrated over the death of the three ethnic cleansers who were killed without a fair trial...

  • 23. 0 0
    We Americans Demand Clarification from Obama
    • Humble Jew
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:21

    We, the majority of American Jews that voted Obama into office, demand clarification as to why he is trying to weaken Israel's resolve to defend itself. We didn't vote for him so that he should harm Israel. 2012 is around the corner.

  • 22. 0 0
    Killing unarmed men defended?
    • Walter Horowitz
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:17

    Perhaps killing unarmed men is against the rule of law that most nations observe, with the exception of course of Israel, Russia, Zimbabwe, The Sudan, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, and Syria. Nice company to be a member of. A nation of laws arrests criminals and puts them on trial and then when found guilty, imprisons them. The right wing in Israel believe every Arab is a terrorist that can be shot and killed whenever an Israeli feels the urge. This is not the same country David Ben Gurion helped create. It is a country without a soul that is the strongest country in the region but yet feels itself the victim and lashes out at its enemies recklessly without regard for human life.

  • 21. 0 0
    why no trial
    • Jay
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:14

    If murderers do not surrender to the authorties who come to arrest them, should they be let free or should lethal force be used. The choice was the murders. Surrender or die.

  • 20. 0 0
    IDF will keep 'aggressively' defending Israelis
    • MaxBax
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:12

    @Doron Katz Quod licet iovi non licet bovi

  • 19. 0 0
    Dudi and justice...
    • Sam Soul
    • 27.12.09
    • 15:10

    and what about israeli killers ? and settlers ? They should not go free. Palestinians have the right to defend themselves against those agressions ! NACHON ? Your justice is not justice.

  • 18. 0 0
    #5; In which war were trials held (during the war)
    • Murray of Montreal
    • 27.12.09
    • 14:53

    for targeting civilians by an enemy? Congratulations to the IDF for finding those responsible, and putting an end to the murder of civilians by terrorists.

  • 17. 0 0
    US asking for explanation
    • Josh
    • 27.12.09
    • 14:33

    We are not questioning your methods of killing terrorists. Why do you think that we owe you an explanation regarding how we deal with them?

  • 16. 0 0
    Israel owes the US no explanations
    • Skullivan
    • 27.12.09
    • 14:26

    Unless of course they keep on taking American Taxpayer money. There will come a day even when AIPAC's congressional friends cannot justify the continuation of aid on present terms. Hopefully soon. JStreet should help.

  • 15. 0 0
    Bad boys
    • Pedro
    • 27.12.09
    • 13:52

    Bibi acted correctly. The worse answer for the terror attack would be hesitation. And I have to admit that the Israelis know act as bad boys when necessary.

  • 14. 0 0
    US should have asked why this Rabbi was shot in the
    • BBQ
    • 27.12.09
    • 13:37

    first place and why didn't the Palestinian Authority take care of it quickly... The US even asking is way out of line... Israel owes no explanation to the Obama administration.

  • 13. 0 0
    Obama officialy lost one more supporter
    • Oren
    • 27.12.09
    • 13:35

    Asking for an explanation is like asking U.S marines in Iraq why they shoot and kill known terrorists responsible for killing Americans. Obama, you can choose to side with a people who choose violence over growth, or you can support Israel. The only democracy in the middle east. Either way, it's to late to win me back. Obama, you have gone to far in subjugating your friends.

  • 12. 0 0
    dudi you're right.
    • Petra
    • 27.12.09
    • 13:15

  • 11. 0 0
    nora 6
    • potobac
    • 27.12.09
    • 12:39

    If in fact Israel can make it without the financial and diplomatic support of the US, it would still wind up in tough shape. He who pays the piper calls the tune. If you don't like our butting in, do without our help.

  • 10. 0 0
    Steven & Palestinian Brit
    • ChanahS
    • 27.12.09
    • 12:00

    Meir Hai was not given a trial and was unarmed when he was shot in the head. Don't remember you decrying his murder. Hypocrites!

  • 9. 0 0
    Ask the al-aqsa murderers for explanations
    • Ana
    • 27.12.09
    • 11:44

    I have not heard Obama ask for explanations about the murder of a rabbi. Why doesn?t he ask the al-aqsa murderers? chief, Abbas.

  • 8. 0 0
    they were terrorists
    • vik
    • 27.12.09
    • 09:07

    What the heck is the problem?? They were members of a terror group and they were killed. Case closed. Move on to the next group.

  • 7. 0 0
    Explain, explain, explain...to Obama
    • Nora Tel Aviv
    • 27.12.09
    • 09:04

    Has Israel lost its independence? The US doesn`t even wait for a customary declaration, it immediately urges for an EXPLANATION.

  • 6. 0 0
    Self defence?
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 27.12.09
    • 09:00

    Self defence from "suspects" who, as usual, had no opportunity to present a defence of their own! Let's see if the Americans agree with Israel's definition of "self defence" They know full well that this will escalate the violence - putting more Settles at risk. Difficult to see how they are being defended!

  • 5. 0 0
    Israel's definition of trial by Jury
    • Steven
    • 27.12.09
    • 08:56

    Israel's definition of trial by Jury.

  • 4. 0 0
    And the answer is...
    • dudi
    • 27.12.09
    • 08:55

    Nuuu. They were terrorists. They killed a Jewish west bank "RESIDENT". The IDF found them. The IDF shot them. That's it! Any more stupid questions? P.S. If the killers are dead the IDF doesn't have to set them free later in an exchange. Killers should not go free, NACHON? What language do you need this explaind in Mr. Obama?

  • 3. 0 0
    U can't be serious!
    • Homer Jones
    • 27.12.09
    • 08:53

    If this story is really true, Bibi, should ask himself how would begin respond. Or Sharon, Shamir or Arens. Enough getting pushed around by Rahm. If Bibi can't stand up to Obama, bring back Arens!

  • 2. 0 0
  • 1. 0 0
    Obama explain killing of Afghan militants
    • Doron Katz
    • 27.12.09
    • 08:48