• Published 17:26 03.11.09
  • Latest update 00:23 04.11.09

Britain: Israeli settlements are 'illegal' and 'obstacle' to peace

Egypt: Israel taking 'racist steps' to rid Jerusalem of Arabs; Jordan: Stop Israeli unilateral actions.

By Haaretz Service Tags: Egypt Hillary Clinton Israel news

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband on Tuesday criticized Israel's construction of settlements in the West Bank as "illegal" and said they represented an "obstacle" in the path of peace.

"Settlements are illegal in our view and an obstacle" that impedes efforts which seek to work out a final settlement between the Israelis and Palestinians, Miliband told a press conference at the end of a one-day visit to Jordan and talks with King Abdullah II.

The British Foreign Secretary also conferred in Amman with the U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell to review the outcome of a regional tour Mitchell and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton were carrying out to try to spur the stalled peace process.

Miliband supported the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital and expressed concern over Israeli violations in East Jerusalem, which Israel captured from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War.

"The current situation is obviously particularly tense in respect to Jerusalem. We view events there with considerable concern, along with our EU and international partners," he said.

Miliband also warned that any alternative to a two-state vision as a solution for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict would be "dark and unwelcome".

Abdullah II, for his part, urged the international community to pressure Israel to stop its "unilateral actions" in East Jerusalem, according to a royal court statement following their meeting.

"The monarch underlined the importance of the European Union's role, particularly that of Britain, in efforts aimed at ensuring the setting up of an independent Palestinian state, which is a prerequisite for Middle East peace," said the statement.

King Abdullah warned against "the dangers inherent in the Israeli unilateral actions, especially the construction of settlements and other measures that threaten the identity of Jerusalem and holy places there, and called on the international community to put pressure on Israel to halt such steps," added the statement.

Egypt: Israel taking 'racist steps' to rid Jerusalem of Arabs

The Egyptian Foreign Ministry, meanwhile, urged the international community to protect Jerusalem from the "racist steps" being taken by Israel to change the demographics of the city.

A Foreign Ministry spokesman appealed to the United Nations Security Council with the complaint that Israel has been trying to change the demographic reality in all Palestinian territory, particularly in Jerusalem.

The Egyptian complaint came just before Clinton arrived in Cairo, culminating days of meetings across North Africa and in Israel. Clinton was met in Cairo late Tuesday by the U.S. Mideast peace envoy, Mitchell.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit also said on Tuesday that Cairo wants assurances that any Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations would ensure a Palestinian state and not be used to "waste time".

Clinton, facing Arab accusations that she had been too soft on Israel, later said in Morocco that Israel's offer to show restraint on settlements fell short of U.S. expectations.

"We want to have guarantees for the Palestinians ... that ensure them that these negotiations will not be used to waste time or to accomplish Israeli objectives against them," Aboul Gheit told a news conference in Cairo.

He said Egypt also wanted "guarantees that give them the right for a Palestinian state".

Clinton is on a whirlwind trip through the Middle East seeking to garner Arab support for the resumption of stalled peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.

She is due to arrive in Cairo later on Tuesday and will meet with Aboul Gheit and Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman before holding talks on Wednesday with President Hosni Mubarak. The talks are likely to focus on the peace process.

Aboul Gheit, asked about Clinton's stance on resuming talks, said he was hoping for clarification on Washington's view.

"I have to wait and see the reaction of the American Secretary of State as she arrives in Cairo tonight, because she gave certain explanations last night. We have to get them ourselves and then consider the issue," he said.

While in Morocco, Clinton offered aid to boost ties with the Muslim world and urged Israel, the Palestinians and Arab countries to move beyond recrimination in the search for peace.

After a weekend of heated words about the perceived U.S. tilt toward Israel on the issue of settlements in the West Bank, Clinton said it was important for all sides to "be careful about what we say" and avoid angry rhetoric.

"We are determined and persistent in the pursuit of that goal," she said in a speech at a development forum in Morocco attended by Arab ministers.

"We need to work together in a constructive spirit toward this shared goal of a comprehensive peace. I believe very strongly that it is attainable ... (and) that with your support we can find a way through."

Clinton's speech unveiled a modest new set of aid proposals aimed at building on President Barack Obama's promise in a June address in Cairo to make a "new beginning" on Washington's strained ties with the Islamic world.

But it came after Clinton sparked a new outburst of Arab anger by praising Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's offer of "restraint" on settlements without repeating earlier U.S. calls for a freeze on them, which is the Palestinian position.

Clinton repeated that the United States is committed to reaching a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, saying this was a key to achieving a peaceful and prosperous future for the region.

Hoping to cast the United States as a helpful partner in development for Muslim communities, Clinton outlined a series of small steps to increase funding for civil society groups, youth empowerment and job promotion.

"We are committed to building ladders of opportunity to help develop the enormous talent that resides in the people of this region," she said.

The programs Clinton announced on Tuesday include a $76 million project to boost economic opportunities in Yemen, a $30 million project for vulnerable young people in Jordan and an entrepreneurship summit in Washington next year to bring Muslim innovators together with U.S. business leaders.

Taken together the new package pales in comparison to the billions of dollars in aid that Washington extends to governments in the region, including both Israel and Egypt.

Obama's Cairo speech had sparked some hope in the Arab world that Washington was ready to take a tougher line with Israel, with the U.S. president saying flatly that Israel should stop building settlements on the West Bank.

Those hopes turned to anger as Washington backed off.

On Monday, Clinton sought to control the damage, saying that her praise on Saturday for Israel's offer of restraint on settlements was aimed at encouraging moves toward dialogue.

Clinton said the Obama administration still believed that Israel's offer fell short of U.S. expectations, and urged both sides to take more positive steps to set the stage for resuming peace talks stalled since December.

"I think President Obama was absolutely clear. He wanted a halt to all settlement activity," Clinton told Al Jazeera television on Tuesday. "And perhaps those of us who work with him and for him could have been clearer in communicating that that is his policy, that is what we're committed to doing".

Clinton was due to travel to Egypt for a meeting with President Hosni Mubarak which was also expected to focus on the stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

After Clinton's visit to Jerusalem, Palestinians accused the United States of "back-pedaling" on settlements and said a resumption of Israeli-Palestinian talks was not in sight.

Netanyahu has proposed limiting building for now to some 3,000 settler homes already approved by Israel in the West Bank. He does not regard building in East Jerusalem, annexed in defiance of international opposition, as a settlement.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 68. 0 0
    #30; Czarkazem13 MY Point was...
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 05.11.09
    • 18:26

    and you agreed with "the hypocrisy of the complaint by Arab/Muslim groups". In addition, the Muslim only road I showed you in Saudi Arabia along with Sharia Law practiced there was the illustration of true racism and discrimination. All I know is the Arabs in Israel 1) can have the same access to the legal system as any Jewish person. 2) They can write critical articles in a free press 3) and run for political office. None of which is true for Jews in most Muslim countries. So I return it to you, what's your point? I completely disagree that what's going on in Jerusalem has anything to do with Racism or discrimination. I look at it as survival.

  • 67. 0 0
    Settlements are illegal #56 B. Gold
    • Ron
    • 05.11.09
    • 18:12

    You have been made aware that your comments on this subject are false. Why do you keep repeating them? Israel settlements on territory occupied in 1967 are illegal. Jews repeatedly report false facts about the Mandate. The Mandate was to establish in Palestine a national home for Jewish people, but said, clearly that nothing should be done which might prejudice civil or religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. The word IRREVOCABLE was not in the Mandate.The Mandate, however, is irrelevant,because it expired on 14 May 1948, and from that date was no longer an instrument of international law, when Israel, under UN resolution 181, declared statehood. When Israel occupied the rest of Palestine in1967, and refused to withdraw from occupied territory, it was in violation of UN resolutions 242,452 and 465. When it built in the West Bank and annexed Jerusalem it was in violation of articles 49,53, and 147 of 4th Geneva Convention and thus committing a war crime.

  • 66. 0 0
    #27;Mark Lincoln, Nice Try Bubba
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 05.11.09
    • 14:13

    Thanks, for your response, which was expected. Mark L. writes: "You seem, however, to have missed an important point in that first definition: ". . .usually involving the idea that one`s own race is superior and has the right to rule others." M from G: No actually I didn't? hence my referral to Koranic Law(Sharia) denying non-Muslims equal rights. You apparently, are the one that missed the point! ML Writes: "Also, your attempt to justify Israeli racism by citing Arab racism is the classic Tu Quoque logical fallacy." M from G: Of course that is NOT what I did: "As usual the Arabs falsely accuse Israel of what they themselves are guilty of. RACISM." Note the word "falsely". You see ML I disagree with your statements about Israel and "discrimination" or that Israel "dispossessed" land. The fact is you prefer to champion the rights of an invented people(the Arab Palestinian) who actually thought of themselves as Syrian, over a real people with a real country.

  • 65. 0 0
    Settlements are illegal in WB, they should bein ISRAEL
    • Pierre Lefevbre
    • 04.11.09
    • 20:37

    If Pm Netanyahu wants PEACE negociations, then he must show that he is sincere. He must stop all settlements building, which he ,as an intelligent man should know, that you cannot build on the conquered territories of others, and still beleiving that you are doing the Palestinians a favour in stealing their lands. The Pm should demonstrate to the world that he means business when he said "I want to negociate" and the Palestinans are right to refuse WAISTING MORE TIME since 1967.

  • 64. 0 0
    I Have a Dream !
    • Martin Rajah
    • 04.11.09
    • 20:29

    that ABBAS was laughing of them fruitless negociations. that Abbass step down passing the reign of Power to a more MILITANT young Blood, that Abbass was asking every Palestinians to accept,the Creation of a BINATIONAL State. that most of the Islamic countries waS FOCING HIM instead for UDI,( Unilateral Declaration of Independance ) That the world communities 2 countries were celebrating the long awaiting INDEPENDACE of the State of Palestine. That most of the Israelis too were quite happy of their new next door neighbor.

  • 63. 0 0
    Israel`s own high court says all the settlements are illegal
    • Giovani
    • 04.11.09
    • 19:27

    Come on Micheal they will call them self hating Jews...another new key word they use. Just remember you reap what you sow and as Israel was created by terrorism that Irhun and other perpetrated so will their demise come

  • 62. 0 0
    #47 Jack Fisher - Since you mentioned Obama
    • *BEN JABO
    • 04.11.09
    • 18:38

    And the pressure he supposedly exerted on Miliband, you might want to know that Obama lost two States to the Republican's, in other words "The old grey mare ain't what she used to be" Seems most of Obamas desires are'nt being fulfilled, includig his plea to Iran to kiss and make up I won't go the entire litany of what Obama has failed to accomplish, though if I would, I'd state with Obama Health Care You hear that Jack??

  • 61. 0 0
    #47 Politics says.....
    • Johnboy
    • 04.11.09
    • 11:06

    P: "Did I hear Chinese settlements are ilegal? Ofcourse not" No, of course not: Tibet is part of the sovereign territory of China. It simply isn't possible for you to "illegally colonize" your own territory.

  • 60. 0 0
    Israel's own high court says all the settlements are illegal
    • Michael
    • 04.11.09
    • 10:40

    Israel's own high court confirmed that Israel holds the West Bank in the legal status of an occupying power through war. By doing so, it confirmed that ALL the settlements are illegal because they breach the obligations of such an occupying power. End of story. Milliband's only saying what the whole world believes. It's just that he's honest enough to say it to Israel's face. Like Goldstone, it probably helps that he's Jewish because he can't be accused of anti-semitism.

  • 59. 0 0
    milliband at the mad hatters tea party
    • vhardman
    • 04.11.09
    • 10:27

    little boy blue has not heard of the san remo convention 1920 and the 1922 mandate ?tretay of sevres , anglo- american convention britain is bound by these treaties !!

  • 58. 0 0
    Pax Lewis Carrolliana
    • sh
    • 04.11.09
    • 09:47

    '...Clinton sought to control the damage, saying that her praise on Saturday for Israel's offer of restraint on settlements was aimed at encouraging moves toward dialogue.' Towards dialogue about what exactly? Certainly not a Palestinian state and peaceful coexistence. You can't negotiate handing over a cake once you've eaten it. Well, not unless your name's Alice and you've gone Through the Looking Glass.

  • 57. 0 0
    Where was the UK when . . .
    • Zev Davis
    • 04.11.09
    • 09:42

    Pardon me if I go far back to the time when the Crown was selling dope the the Chinese and suceeded in wresting "the Crown Colony of Hong Kong". Okay, it was a lease hold and they were forced to give it back to its owners. If I recall, too, I didn't hear any protests to the actions of the People's Republic of . . . in Tibet, what the British didn't say much the actions of the Indonesians in East Timor. Then too, what's gonna happen if the Scots and the Norweigians decide to take over their off-shore oil reserves, if, they are still relevant. Somehow the British forgot that they don't rule the waves anymore.

  • 56. 0 0
    There is nothing illegitimate about Jewish settlements in ...
    • B. Gold
    • 04.11.09
    • 09:38

    There is nothing illegitimate about Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria. The right of Jews to settle in the Land of Israel, and not only on one side of the Green Line, is not only based on the Bible and the history of the Jewish people, but has received international recognition in the League of Nations mandate for Palestine and U.S. approval in the Anglo-American Convention of 1924. This international recognition and the subsequent American approval have never been revoked. Insistence that certain areas in the Land of Israel be closed to Jews stands in opposition to these rights and the accepted values common to all Western societies.? (Moshe Arens, ?Great expectations and pious hopes? June 2009)

  • 55. 0 0
    English settlements in Scotland and Ireland are illegal !
    • Vitaly
    • 04.11.09
    • 09:26

    " Come now! Gather now! Here where the flower grow, White is the blossom as the snow on the Benn, Here, now! Freedom calls! We'll take a solemn vow, To fight by the Roses O' Prince Charlie! " Down with the illegal English settlements!

  • 54. 0 0
    #6-13 Hey Pals
    • Oggy
    • 04.11.09
    • 08:29

    Actually you anti-Zionists are wrong about hte Zionist theory. The current one is that the Arabs will eventually evolve to the point that they will realize how their point is wrong, until they get a leader like ours, not claiming to want the entire Palestine under his power. Until then, we could create a temporary state for them (as Netanyahu is doing) until they get real. And that was for your information. You're welcome.

  • 53. 0 0
    David - What about ALL of the land?
    • Ryan
    • 04.11.09
    • 07:48

    You provided us with sources indicating the demographics of Jerusalem over time. That is fine. Now, do us all a favor. Use your same sources to indicate the population of people - from the same Ottoman, Anglo sources you provided - to describe the demographics of ALL of Palestine (today Israel) as a whole. I'll give you a preview. 1850-1900, 95% Arab, 5% Jewish. By 1948, 70% Arab, 30% Jewish. And so forth.

  • 52. 0 0
    David in Boston - Jerusalem is not totally Jewish
    • Palestinian Brit
    • 04.11.09
    • 06:55

    Your statistics show that there has always been a considerable number of Arabs in Jerusalem - both Christian and Moslem. The fact that today the Jews prevent Christians and Moslems from even visiting the Al Aqsa and the Holy Sepulchre shows that Israel is not just in its occupation of the Holy City. The responsibility should be international.

  • 51. 0 0
  • 50. 0 0
    Arab hypocrisy, finely tuned.
    • tzivi
    • 04.11.09
    • 05:12

    Where in the so-called Arab world are the pre-Islamic civilizations and cultures? Answer that, and you will know the Arab speaks so intimately about racism and bigotry because they have so successfully implemented it in their history. Arabization and Islamization is perfectly acceptable, but any other idea or belief is completely eradicated through chauvinistic cultural, political, and psychological suppression, This is why the Arab is so upset with Israel, because what they once conquered, converted, and wholly dominated is out of their cultural control now and this is entirely unacceptable. They are willing to literally force entire populations to suffer for the purpose of their idea of international propaganda, for the whole purpose of religious and cultural intolerance.

  • 49. 0 0
    Unilaterl actions in Jerusalem
    • AlexanderZ
    • 04.11.09
    • 04:50

    I do not know a single Nation on earth which does not take an unilateral actions in its Capital. Jerusalem is the Capital of Israel and if sombody does not like it thats to bad

  • 48. 0 0
  • 47. 0 0
    Frome one jew to another
    • Jack Fisher
    • 04.11.09
    • 03:48

    David Miliband is a jew himself and has been pressured by obama to come out with this, do you get the message Israel?

  • 46. 0 0
    At Last, Some Welcome Words From The Brits
    • chet
    • 04.11.09
    • 02:56

    If the Brits' words result in some kind of action (possibly with other EU countries) and Clinton's backtracking signals an effort to curb the colonization activities, Israel might be in for some rocky roads in the future. But, OTOH, talk is cheap and ...

  • 45. 0 0
    Break Off Diplomatic Relations
    • Boyd
    • 04.11.09
    • 02:25

    I hope Egypt and Jordan get so fed up with Israel's arrogance and disrespect for the peace process and international law that they end diplomatic relations with Israel. Israel needs to be isolated in the hopes it will realize it is a pariah and eventually choose to act like other nations. I know it is a long shot, but nothing else seems to work.

  • 44. 0 0
    violence is the obstacle to peace
    • Avi
    • 04.11.09
    • 01:45

    and we know where the violence and hostility come from too...and guess what? It has little to do with Real Estate.

  • 43. 0 0
    Britain-'illegal' and 'obstacle' Crap
    • Brod
    • 04.11.09
    • 01:34

    Only AntiSemites in the UK can spew this kind of crap. In history, they sided with the Islamist-Jihadists. Ergo, it is not surprising that Britain is becoming a colony of Eurabia.

  • 42. 0 0
    What country are we talking about
    • TOBIA
    • 04.11.09
    • 01:25

    Racism in Israel against the Arabs, Please tell me why so many Jrews hads to leave the Arab countries without their property.

  • 41. 0 0
    chaim ben kahan 15
    • potobac
    • 04.11.09
    • 01:03

    1. For a very major part of the last two thousand years Jerusalem may have been a lot of things,but it wasn't a Jewish city. 2. I don't suppose you would appreciate the humor, but your purple prose sounds exactly like the way antisemites went on about Jews.

  • 40. 0 0
    MODERATOR, WHERE ARE YOU?
    • Absolute Dane
    • 04.11.09
    • 00:24

    Rachel Rabin has a very valid point, and I would recommend THE MODERATOR

  • 39. 0 0
    # 20 david
    • Axel
    • 04.11.09
    • 00:21

    Now what if we take the census numbers of other cities inside Israel which show an Arab majority? Are you going to admit that they must not be israeli now?

  • 38. 0 0
    Britain unable to convince Arabs to accept Jewish Israel
    • Sam
    • 04.11.09
    • 00:06

    After millions of meetings and conversations, the British, the rest of the EU and the US have been unable to convince the Arabs to accept a Jewish Israel. Just the opposite. The Arabs are waiting for the West to get rid of the Jews for them. So, don't give us Mr.Miliband this BS about obstacles to peace. It doesn't make a difference what Jews do, the Arabs reject a Jewish state. So, those Jews who believe strongly in the Torah will continue to settle the biblical Jewish homeland without reference to what everyone else thinks.

  • 37. 0 0
  • 36. 0 0
    Yeah, and...
    • Michael N
    • 04.11.09
    • 00:01

    Settlements are "illegal" and an "obstacle" to peace. So how come Great Britain is in cahoots with France to prevent the Goldstone report from reaching the Security Council. It is the occupation and settlements which have caused the rocket barrage, and the intifadas. It is the same Great britain that gave the world the duplicitous and oyymoronic Balfour Decleration, which looked favorably on establishing a Jewish national home in Palestine without infringing on the rights of the Indigenous population"...

  • 35. 0 0
    British settlements in Ireland -'illegal' and 'obstacle' to peace
    • Fair Play
    • 03.11.09
    • 23:48

    British settlements in Ireland are 'illegal' and 'obstacle' to peace

  • 34. 0 0
    #23 ah duh
    • *BEN JABO
    • 03.11.09
    • 23:34

    The was room for a second state, as provided by the UN Partition Plan You didn't want it and attacked Israel instead, trying to steal Israel's share You guys made your bed, then found it to be very lumpy

  • 33. 0 0
    Britain Mal-Adminstered her Mandate
    • *BEN JABO
    • 03.11.09
    • 23:26

    As a token of her appreciation to Prince Abdullah, she gave away 75% of the land allocated to the Jews Britain's prostituting her Mandate was really Illegal

  • 32. 0 0
    A Spotlight on Hypercrisy
    • Michael D.
    • 03.11.09
    • 23:26

    Could the Egyptions be anymore hypercritical than to to accuse Israel of "taking racist steps" to rid E. Jerusalem of Arabs? They've got to be kidding! It's Egypt and all the Arabs who are racist for not supporting the Jewish State's right to exist and for historically ridding there own country's Jewish populations. Who are they to judge? This entire issue has NOTHING to do with 2 states or Arabs in E. Jerusalem or anything else that is normally discussed. It comes down to the Arabs unwillingness to accept Israel as an independent Jewish State on ANY piece or amount of land in the middle east. Moreover, the Arab despots, monarchs and leaders can continue to use Israel as a means to deflect public opinion onto something OTHER THAN there own despotic, corrupt, repressive domestic policies.

  • 31. 0 0
    ... so as Chinese settlements in Tibet (20 million Chinese)
    • Dan
    • 03.11.09
    • 23:08

    One `justice` for Israel, another for China. Using the same logic, they didn't bomb the rail tracks to concentration camps but fought the Germans to save themsleves for their own interests. UK should should be the last country to lecture us.

  • 30. 0 0
    Not surprised that someone from Georgia doesn't know racism
    • Czarkazem13
    • 03.11.09
    • 22:31

    Mark, I agree with the hypocrisy of the complaint by Arab/Muslim groups even though I agree with them. However, your definition is what IS going on in Jerusalem. So not sure what your point is.

  • 29. 0 0
    Rachel Rabin ,instead of rooting for pals get som children
    • Absolute Sweden
    • 03.11.09
    • 22:06

    by yourself ,will you ? Besides your PEACE NOW wants pal "refugees" settling in Israel after giving up on WB too. MAKE LOVE NOW! (instead your perfidious screams)

  • 28. 0 0
    But Paul u forget
    • Eli
    • 03.11.09
    • 22:02

    That once the hand of Islam has graced a land with it's presence it is Islamic for eternity to do otherwise is racist by Muslim-Arab standards

  • 27. 0 0
    Always nice to see another who knows the meaning
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 03.11.09
    • 21:33

    "But what is the true meaning of this word?" - Mark from Georgia It is always nice to see another who knows the meaning of words Mark from Georgia. You seem, however, to have missed an important point in that first definition: ". . .usually involving the idea that one`s own race is superior and has the right to rule others." The belief that Jews were given the land by God and have a right to dispossess other held by the settlers is in fact a perfect example of that racial superiority and the right to rule others. And a the entire second definition fits as the government clearly has"a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination," against Arab residents of East Jerusalem and the Occupied Territories. Thus you should be applauded for knowing that words have meanings, and chastised for failing to read your dictionary. Also, your attempt to justify Israeli racism by citing Arab racism is the classic Tu Quoque logical fallacy.

  • 26. 0 0
    Racism
    • Rigoletto
    • 03.11.09
    • 21:18

    Jew were forced to leave syria, Jemen, Lybia, (partly) Egypt, Tunesia, Lebanon, etc: what do you call this "Islamic friendship"??

  • 25. 0 0
    Anonymous #5 besides opinion
    • Gee
    • 03.11.09
    • 21:17

    I challenge you to provide some sort of example of our so-called racism. We are the legal owners of the land, and those people had a legal court order along with their deed to the property. How is that racist? The Arabs assaulted the legal owners, yet at best both sides of racist, not even close. The Arabs from Morocco to Iraq have stolen the natives' lands and oppressed the natives until they either are ethnically cleansed or dead.

  • 24. 0 0
    "$76 million project to boost economic opportunities in Yemen?"
    • Now I understand.
    • 03.11.09
    • 21:05

    So that's how they saved the last of the remaining persecuted Jews!

  • 23. 0 0
    Yonatan because the zionist are steling so much land
    • ah duh?
    • 03.11.09
    • 21:03

    that there wont be enough room for a second state

  • 22. 0 0
    only one way to get a peace deal: cutoff welfare
    • knows it all
    • 03.11.09
    • 21:02

    and tedll both sides no welfare until they have a working peace deal...would make it happen very fast

  • 21. 0 0
    Egypt ethnically cleansed its Jews - who are they to talk?
    • Joe Sittizen
    • 03.11.09
    • 20:42

    Very strange that the racist Egyptians should even mention this, after they kicked all the Jews out of Egypt and stole their assets and properties. If we're talking about war crimes trials, it's time to put the Egyptians, Libyans, Moroccans, Iraqis and others on trial for war crimes against the Jews.

  • 20. 0 0
    Jerusalem always Jewish, see census numbers
    • David
    • 03.11.09
    • 20:23

    Jews were a majority or plurality in Jerusalem, not the huge city, but the main part of the city from the mid 1800s or earlier until kicked out by Arabs. Check out the numbers: Population of Jerusalem until 1945 Year Total Muslim Jewish Christian % Jews 1844 15,510 5,000 7,120 3,390 45.9 1876 25,030 7,560 12,000 5,470 47.9 1896 45,420 8,560 28,112 8,748 61.9 1922 52,081 13,411 33,971 4,699 65.2 1931 90,451 19,894 51,222 19,335 56.6 1945 164,330 33,680 99,320 31,330 60.4 1. This figure is quoted widely on the Web and is apparently the Ottoman census figure. It is given for example here. 2. John Oesterreicher and Anne Sinai, eds., Jerusalem, (NY: John Day, 1974), p. 1 3. British Mandate Census of 1922 and 1931 4. Anglo American Survey, 1945

  • 19. 0 0
    #6 demographic fear tactics
    • David G
    • 03.11.09
    • 20:17

    First, claims that Jews will be a minority in ?historic Palestine? the territory of the former British mandate are irrelevant. Israel took painful steps to disengage from Gaza for a reason. If a one state solution were to ever happen it would never include Gaza. Secondly predicting demographic beyond 20 or so years is foolish pseudoscience, no one could predict the massive wave of immigrants from Russia in the early 90?s or the rapid change in birthrates over the last two decades. For all we know major economic or environmental disasters could greatly alter the population or migration flows for reasons that have nothing to do with the political situation. Deciding policy on what might the population look like 80 years from now is like comparable to fundamentalist Christians stocking up for the mythical apocalypse.

  • 18. 0 0
    Seeking to retain the benefits
    • RfaelMoshe
    • 03.11.09
    • 20:16

    In essence, by claiming E. Jerusalem as "Palestinan land" because E. Jerusalem was sucessfuly ethnically cleansed of Jews by Jordan in 1948, the Palestinians are seeking to retain the benefits of the past ethnic cleansing. Similarly,although many different and distinct Moslem empires had invaded Jerusalem,the Palestinians,as Moslems, although themselves the descendants of economic migrants in recent historic times, claim to be the heirs of any and all Moslem empires. Its yet another an example of Moslem arrogance.

  • 17. 0 0
    "CAREFUL WHAT WE SAY..."
    • EL
    • 03.11.09
    • 20:10

    So, does secretary Clinton says. One wonders if she is listening to herself? To declare that Israel has taken "unprecedented" steps regarding the Palestinians is a joke. The story does not change. The American government's position is stupid, blind, and phony.

  • 16. 0 0
    arik, is that clear enough for you?
    • BBSNews
    • 03.11.09
    • 20:04

    "I think President Obama was absolutely clear. He wanted a halt to all settlement activity," Clinton told Al Jazeera television on Tuesday. "And perhaps those of us who work with him and for him could have been clearer in communicating that that is his policy, that is what we're committed to doing". Ouch! Hillary over-stepped the boss...

  • 15. 0 0
    Islamic domination being resisted
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 03.11.09
    • 19:58

    Israel is desperately trying not be to gobbled up by the Islamic hoard. Jerusalem is under siege by foreigners and Israel is trying to hold on to it's Capital city that has been such for thousands of years. When will the world stand up to the Islamic invasion? We beat them once in Vienna and now it's time to take a stand once again!

  • 14. 0 0
    Obama can expect a firestorm in Congress over any Yemen aid
    • Dr. L. Brnd
    • 03.11.09
    • 19:35

    Yemen, which just ethnically cleansed its jewish population, after chasingn them out of their homeland in steps for the last 60 years. Hilary's desire to send aid to Yemen totally discredits her "Jewish settlement" criticism, and she can expect fierce opposition from Dems and Republicans alike in Congress when she tries to get $76 million of our tax bucks for for greasy Yemen bastards, who tried to blow up oneof our destroyers anchored in their harbor, and ardently support local native Bin Laden. Congress, unlike the Obama regime, recognizes hostile anti-American countries with phony "pro-American" dictators with their hands out, like Pakistan, Afganistan, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon... and Yemen. Congress won't approve a nickel for Yemen (except maybe after deducting the entire cost of resettling, supporting and educating its entire Jewish exile population). Watch

  • 13. 0 0
    6# rachel rabin, losing drmographics war
    • a poot jew
    • 03.11.09
    • 19:14

    where you are wrong is in the fact that our extremists (settlers et al.) count on the forced departure of arabs due to expultions or imposed pressure of all sorts.

  • 12. 0 0
    new peace proposal
    • michael
    • 03.11.09
    • 18:59

    everythoing upto the jordan river belongs to isreal. palestians, agree and israel agrees to provide palestinians with full israeli citizenship. peace is here. ok settlers?

  • 11. 0 0
    Arab occupied Jerusalem
    • Chaim Ben Kahan
    • 03.11.09
    • 18:55

    Isn't this the kettle calling the pot black? Egypt and other Arab enemies of Israel have spent the last hundred years trying to rid Israel and the region of Jews and they accuse Israel of doing the very thing they are guilty of!

  • 10. 0 0
    racist
    • kibishi
    • 03.11.09
    • 18:50

    In the case of Israel people who's ancesters lived in houses for hundreds of years were/are evicted for one reason. They just have the wrong religion. That is not racist but just as bad. (Would their ancesters stayed Jewish like the next village or street they could have stayed, no questions asked)

  • 9. 0 0
    Why the fuss now?
    • Yonatan
    • 03.11.09
    • 18:48

    Israel has been building all over Jerusalem, East, West, North and South, ever since 1967. Why is such a big ruckus being raised now? Where was everyone in the '70s, the '80s an the '90s? Is it because now it is clearer than ever that Jews are living all over Jerusalem? Well, I've got news for you: Jerusalem has had a majority Jewish population ever since the mid-nineteenth century.

  • 8. 0 0
    Egypt throwing matches at fuel depots
    • Avi
    • 03.11.09
    • 18:18

    What do they hope to acheive by this?

  • 7. 0 0
    statistically Jerusalem is a Jewish city
    • ben
    • 03.11.09
    • 18:05

    demographics show that Jews outnumber Arabs 2:1.... History shows that Jerusalem has always had a greater Jewish population then any other demographic... how is the reaffirmation of Jerusalems Jewish identity rasist? Egypt is being belligerent...

  • 6. 0 0
    While peace is on hold, we?re losing the demographics war
    • Rachel Rabin
    • 03.11.09
    • 17:55

    In 2009: - 5.4M Jews and 1.5M Palestinians (Moslems and Christians) in pre-67 Israel; that?s 20% Palestinians - 5.9M Jews and 5.4M Palestinians in all of historic Palestine; that?s 48% Palestinians In 2017: - 23% Palestinians in pre-67 Israel - 50% Palestinians in all of historic Palestine In 2063: - 31% Palestinians in pre-67 Israel - 60% Palestinians in all of historic Palestine In 2097: - 38% Palestinians in pre-67 Israel - 67% Palestinians in all of historic Palestine We are a solid majority in pre-67 Israel for generations to come. We begin to be a minority in all of historic Palestine by 2017. Maybe it is us who must be terrified that there are no peace talks and that there is no peace on the horizon. Peace NOW!!! (maybe)

  • 5. 0 0
    Egypt Our Friend and Neighbor
    • fredyr
    • 03.11.09
    • 17:55

    Need I say more. Israel treats Palestinians in Israel better than Egypt and Jordan ever will. Israel made them citizes. Something Egypt and Jordan did not do.

  • 4. 0 0
    Both sides are racist
    • Anonymous
    • 03.11.09
    • 17:49

    The trouble with condemning one side as racist, it overlooks that the other side is also racist. That the demographics war is being conducted by both sides. How often these talkbackers see us as the good guys, pure white, and the other guys as bad and evil; while the truth is both sides are racist (I noticed this in Turkish and Armenian talkbackers too re: their conflict).

  • 3. 0 0
    Isn't that what Islam does?
    • Paul
    • 03.11.09
    • 17:48

    Where ever Islam goes, they change the demographics of cities and countries. In fact before Islam changed the demographics of Egypt, Egypt was actually Christian, hence the Coptics. So whats good for the goose, is just as good for the gander. Jerusalem was, is, and will remain a predominantly Jewish city.

  • 2. 0 0
    RACISM the most misused word in the dictionary
    • Mark from Georgia
    • 03.11.09
    • 17:48

    Here we go again! The merits of this kind of case we ultimately be decided in an Israeli court. Whether or not the activities are legal? But what is the true meaning of this word? Racism: 1) " a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others." 2) " a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination." Here is a TRUE example of #2 above: http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/SaudiArabia.html In addition Koranic law doesn't even allow Non-Muslims to testify in court, why?they're not good enough! As usual the Arabs falsely accuse Israel of what they themselves are guilty of. RACISM.

  • 1. 0 0
    Well, Clinton didn't contribute much to peace-on-earth...
    • Esther
    • 03.11.09
    • 17:42

    ...during her recent unfortunate foray to Jerusalem... Her "unprecedented" declarations to the Pals reached the nether limits of condescension...