Blair: No plan to attack Iran, only sensible solution is diplomacy
U.S. Secretary of State Rice in Europe to discuss stricter sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.
By The Associated PressBritish Prime Minister Tony Blair said on Thursday he did not know of any plans for an attack on Iran over its nuclear program but refused to rule it out completely.
A diplomatic solution to the standoff was the only one "anyone can think of" that was viable and sensible, Blair said in a BBC radio interview.
But pressed repeatedly on whether an attack was inconceivable, Blair declined to say so.
"You can't absolutely predict every set of circumstances that comes about, but sitting here now and talking to you I can tell you that Iran is not Iraq," he said.
"There is, as far as I know, no planning going on to make an attack on Iran and people are pursuing a diplomatic and political solution for a very good reason ... that it is the only solution that anyone can think of as viable and sensible," he said.
Blair said he could not think that it would be "right" to take military action against Iran.
"The question people should be asking me is: What do you do if they get a nuclear weapon? It's a very hard question. Which is why we had better make sure that this political and diplomatic track works," he said.
Rice to meet with EU, Russian officials over stricter Iran sanctions
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice planned to confer Thursday with European diplomats ahead of a likely push for new sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear program.
Rice scheduled a strategy meeting Thursday with European Union and Russian diplomats as a UN deadline loomed for Iran to stop enriching uranium.
"The best course would be for Iran to suspend its enrichment and reprocessing activities so that we can return to negotiations," Rice told reporters Tuesday.
"That is the entire purpose of having the pressure on the Iranian regime, so that the Iranian regime can make better choices about how to engage the international community," she said.
Rice said last week that the United States probably would press for another UN resolution condemning Iran for continuing to defy the demand to stop enriching uranium, and to seek additional penalties against Tehran.
The UN nuclear watchdog on Wednesday put finishing touches on a report expected to confirm that Iran was continuing uranium enrichment activities.
Such a finding would be a step toward additional sanctions, but it was not clear whether UN Security Council members Russia and China would go along.
The Security Council set a 60-day deadline on December 23 for Iran to freeze its enrichment activities and said continued Iranian defiance past that ultimatum, which ran out Wednesday, could lead to stronger punishment.
The Security Council is demanding an immediate and unconditional stop to uranium enrichment, after which European-led negotiations over an economic reward package might begin. Iran has long insisted it will not stop its nuclear activities as a condition for negotiations to start.
Both Rice and her German counterpart, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, expressed hope after a meeting Wednesday that a compromise might still be reached with Iran.
They refused to comment on what action Tehran might face for defying the latest UN deadline.
Steinmeier said he had made clear to Iran that rather than ambiguous public statements, the West needed real, reliable signals of accommodation that actually allow us to find the way back to the negotiating table.
"I am not giving up hope of succeeding in this, but I say again and again that decisions are needed in Tehran itself," he told reporters.
In Washington, a top U.S. State Department official said Iran was in a diplomatic pincer movement that could force it to resume negotiations.
U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns said only a handful of countries were backing Iran in its defiance of the Security Council. Burns said Iran was beginning to feel economic pressures as well, citing in particular a sharp decline recently in export credits from Europe.
Burns spoke Wednesday night to a meeting of the Atlantic Council, which advocates close ties between the United States and Europe.
Top Iranian officials showed no signs of compromise this week.
"The enemy is making a big mistake if it thinks it can thwart the will of the Iranian nation to achieve the peaceful use of nuclear technology," Iranian state TV's Web site quoted President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as saying Wednesday.
Enriched to a low level, uranium is used to produce nuclear fuel but further enrichment makes it suitable for use in building an atomic bomb.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
the virtues of war.
Bush is going to go into any Iranian War with NO Coalition of the Willing. There is ZERO possibility of Britain getting involved. Blair is in the twilight moments of his premiership, which has been blighted by his misbegotten Iraq War. Gordon Brown will want to distance himself as rapidly as possible from Blair's mistakes, and there is no chance this canny Scotsman will compound them by getting Britain involved in an even bigger shambles.
Somebody said once, that Israel is like a wrong kind of organ transplant in this area .The new organ will create the antibodies,which do not only destroy the new organ but the whole body(Middle-East). I thought that it was a crazy idea, but when reading these tallback opinions, Maybe he was nearer the truth than I thought.
As hard as Israel is trying to start a war between Iran and America, it jest not going to happen.
Iran was at war with Iraq for almost a decade and they could not even defeat Iraq. The size of the country does not mean anything. The price of threatening to wipe off Israel is high. Remember the Six Day War in 1967 when Israel destroyed the combined armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan? The surrounding Arab states even had some help from Iraq but the Iraqi brigade was decimated before it could reach Israel. Of course, Iran would want Hezbollah and Syria to join them in attacking Israel. When this happens, Lebanon and Syria will regret their participation.
Israel must do what it must do, but don't think confronting Iran is like confronting Iraq. You can read into this anything you want....I see your little excursion into lebanon has you safer now......I am just sick and tired of helping to support a holy war and a religious state that provokes and instigates as much as it is in the position of being 'victim'..only a one state solution with freedoms and rights for ALL will bring stability to the region....al sides will just have to learn top adjust. US will see the error of a two-state solution one day. and once a one state deal is begun neighboring arab states will slowly, very slowly learn to coexist, but the extremists wacko's on all sideds will have to be tamed down and quieted down to an annoying level, not the destructive hurricane force bunch of hot air and baloney it is.
T A Sheppard, Tony blair isn't Israel's prime minister. Stick to the plan dude!
Will end up with a strike on Iran's nuclear sites, just wait and see.
Who would expect the attack come from you, Blair? Iran isn't something you can play with like Iraq. Bush will do that FOR ISRAEL, that's imminent. Congratulation, we have never nearest to the armageddon like TODAY.
What is the alternative? Nobody is saying about marching into Iran. Would being in the receiving end of the fanatics' mushroom cloud be more preferable? Are you suggesting that Israel should accept national suicide? What kind of crap is this?
I remember how Bush and Blair both claimed that they wanted a diplomatic solution to the crisis they had invented with Iraq. These statements continued even thought the build up of forces in the region was on going and obvious to all. This is exactly what we see now. The US has two carrier groups and two expeditionary strike groups in the Arabian Sea. Who do those liars think they are fooling?
if israel insists on marching into Iran and eliminating the threat,...get it boys! LOL........it would be very stupid, but then again Lebanon wasn't exactly a big success either was it?? if you can't get Lebanon right, how the heck do you propose to have voctory in attacking Iran???!!!
Diplomacy does not bear any results with fanatics. Until Blair and others like him understand this concept, they will continue to dwell on fantasy. It looks like they will look the other way round when Israel gets Iran's mushroom cloud. Meanwhile, Israel must not rely on others to prevent this mushroom cloud from happening. Israel has to defend and protect its nation without depending on empty talks and assurances of other countries.