• Published 12:15 25.03.10
  • Latest update 12:15 25.03.10

Assad: Syria committed to peace, but has no faith in Israel

Syrian president says talks cannot continue without Israeli committment to leave all of Golan Heights.

By Reuters Tags: Hezbollah Syria Lebanon Israel news

Syria is committed to seeking peace with Israel but has no faith in the present Israeli government, President Bashar al-Assad said on Wednesday, after a war of words between the two sides.

"War is the worst solution. We must continue to seek peace. Does this mean that we have hope in the current Israeli government? No," Assad told the Lebanese television station al-Manar, which is owned by the Shi'ite movement Hezbollah.

"I don't think that Israel, from what we hear from its supporters, has any choice except peace. Israel is effectively weaker and military force is no longer a guarantor of Israel's existence," he added.

Four rounds of indirect peace talks between Syria and Israel, which were being mediated by Turkey, broke down in 2008.

Syria says the talks cannot continue without an Israeli commitment to withdraw from whole of the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau which Israel captured in 1967.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem said last month Israel was "behaving like thugs" and planting the seeds of a war in the Middle East that might not spare Israeli cities.

Moualem was responding to remarks by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak raising the specter of an "all out war" with Syria if peace were not achieved between the two foes.

Syria's continued support for Hezbollah formed the backdrop to the rhetoric, diplomats said. U.S. officials have also warned Syria against maintaining support for the armed movement, which is also backed by Iran.

Assad said the Syrian government was steadfast in backing what he described as Arab resistance forces, but peace remained its first option.

"Even the resistance wants peace. They were formed because of the absence of peace," Assad said.

Hezbollah was set up with Iranian and Syrian support during the Israeli occupation of Lebanese territory in the 1980s. It also fought a war with Israel in 2006 that cost Lebanon a heavy civilian toll, but it remains a formidable guerrilla force.

U.S.-supervised direct talks collapsed in 2000 after the late President Hafez al-Assad, Bashar's father, refused to sign a deal that did not return what he considered the whole of the Golan.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 20. 0 0
    realize
    • Joshua
    • 02.04.10
    • 21:59

    That the infidels are terrified of what consequences would befall upon them were war to come of any of this. They'll never admit it, but it is still to be realized. They'll attack, it's inevitable. They're still terrified because they realize it will be the end of their existence.

  • 19. 0 0
    It is wiser Israel should accept peace even at the terms of Arab
    • sharshikan
    • 28.03.10
    • 05:29

    It is wiser Israel should accept peace even at the terms of Arab dictation as Israel is effectively weaker.

  • 18. 0 0
    'Military force is no longer a guarantor of Israel's existence'
    • Morris Valentine
    • 27.03.10
    • 05:21

    Really, Mr Assad? How quickly you've forgotten what happened to your 'peaceful' nuclear reactor complex. With neighbours like you, I rather think Israel's ONLY guarantor of security IS its military force. MV

  • 17. 0 0
    Syria wants Israel to dance its way RIGHT ???
    • M. S.
    • 25.03.10
    • 18:43

    I realize Syria may sound sincere to America but to me it sounds like it wants Israel to dance to a Syrian tune Israel no not has to dance to any tune not even a American Obama tune much less a Syrian tune I do not ask Syria to dance to any Israeli tune we all want to see things done right RIGHT but not at the cost of losing our own soverienty that took us 2 000 years and so six 6 million dead in W W II to achieve the only answer may be a war to solve the differences that exist in wars we have found answers this way before and so war may be the answer I believe Syria is capable as Hizbulah was in 2006 America does not like that they America does not want to see Syria do as well as Hizbulah did in 2006 RIGHT ??? Thank You... M. S.

  • 16. 0 0
    Syria committed to peace
    • Kwame Sakyi
    • 25.03.10
    • 18:40

    Assad will do well to keep his mouth shut about how well prepared he is for war in any eventuality.Isreal lashed his country for good after Syria underestimated Israel back in 1967. I dont know how old he was at the time. If his country had the capability why will Syria wait for over forty years before making noise now? I suggest to Israel to accept an upfront(not by istallment) payment of 50 trillion dollars in return for the Gollan Heights

  • 15. 0 0
    No Cheap Shots Mark.
    • Jacob Blues
    • 25.03.10
    • 18:19

    Syria is already on record that even if Israel accedes to its primary demand, the return of the entire Golan Heights, that Syria's vision of peace falls far short of real normalized relations, and that it rejects abandoning its alliance with Iran. So just what sort of cheap shot is Syria offering?

  • 14. 0 0
    Why is Syria afraid of peace..?
    • Stephen.
    • 25.03.10
    • 18:17

    Israel has stated a number of times that it seeks peace with Syria, that Israel is willing to sit down and talk without preconditions. Obviously, Syria has decided that three wars with Israel is enough. The fourth and final war as envisaged by the regime in Tehran has yet to convince the Syrians. The current government under PM Netanyahu is most probably the toughest government yet seen in Israel. We must also understand, only a tough and resolute government that stands up to the vague policies of the gracious president has the respect of all Arab Countries. For some may laugh, yet so is it in the Middle East, for only the strong survive. One must study only the minority governments in the ME and their respective governments. The clincher is, that Washington only knows this far too well, however Democrats are not what the doctor ordered, especially against the Extreme Global Jihad or Russia and China. Good night from snowy Alps.

  • 13. 0 0
    assad has been riding his father's
    • Brazen
    • 25.03.10
    • 17:56

    coat tails since he's took over the dictatorship. He is a second generation murder, would you expect anything less from a ingnorant arab dictator. Give back the land you conqured in a war that we lost. Yea right bashir is only a puppet and proxy to his iranian babba, when babba says jump bashir says how high babba. You (syria) and your buddies have once again miscalculated the Israeli's. No sachel you would think after all the defeats these arabs have accumulated they would learn, this will be the demise of ignorant arab dictators.

  • 12. 0 0
    Syria and the Jews
    • christoph
    • 25.03.10
    • 16:05

    I'm not very well informed about Jewish life in Syria. But it seems like Syria didn't do much to stand by its Jewish citizens. Syrians should be honest towards themselves here. But this remark of mine is no invitation to use victims for political aims. Mizrachi Jews and holocaust survivors don't seem to be given much regard in Israel either.

  • 11. 0 0
    ironic
    • Friends and Enemies
    • 25.03.10
    • 15:16

    It is funny that now both friends and enemies both inside and outside of Israel have come to the same inescapable conclusion... the current government in Israel can not make peace. primary because it is composed of the radical right who do not want peace who are content with the status quo, sure in their own delusions that if it gets to hot uncle Sam will bail them out.... really!!1... Really if you look at current events the US is no longer in their pocket

  • 10. 0 0
    He wants peace, just not with Israel
    • Ilan
    • 25.03.10
    • 15:06

    Fine then.

  • 9. 0 0
    It is a pity
    • Anne
    • 25.03.10
    • 14:51

    For the peace - it is needed two. But to start a war, one is enough. And normally it is the one, who thinks to be stronger than the other one and sure to win.

  • 8. 0 0
    He can't fight, he'll lose. But he's not weak enough for peace
    • Aaron C
    • 25.03.10
    • 14:42

    He is no great threat - he can't fight at the moment without losing heavily, and losing his family's role as hereditary dictators. But he is too strong domestically and in the Arab and Iranian world to be able to enter serious peace negotiations. For true peace, he would have to accept that the Golan is now part of the Land of Israel (just ask the people who live there!) and that it is unacceptable to continue sheltering and funding Hamas and Hezbollah, and must start to hand over their leaders to Israel. But he can't accept the terms of true peace - presently can't afford to. When Israel has his country by the neck, and can impose a reasonable settlement, then we may finally see peace. But for now, the stalemate suits Israel just fine.

  • 7. 0 0
    War is the worst option for Syria because.....
    • US CITIZEN
    • 25.03.10
    • 06:03

    ...the Syrians always lose! Besides, even Assad has figured out that with peace his country can prosper; but with war his people will certainly be worse off. In fact, were he to engage Israel in a war and lose, his generals might very well replace him. And I doubt they would be very gentle about it.

  • 6. 0 0
    That is easy to say
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 25.03.10
    • 05:30

    It is very easy to say you are committed to seeking peace with Israel when you are certain Israel is absolutely committed to never having peace with you. Syria just took a cheap shot.

  • 5. 0 0
    The dogs begin to smell blood
    • utagawa
    • 25.03.10
    • 05:05

    Now that Israel's bodyguard has been bought off by Arab oil and PC leftist liberal misplaced sympathy, Arabs see new opportunities to destroy the Jewish State.

  • 4. 0 0
    pure syrian balony
    • real vision
    • 25.03.10
    • 03:36

    Syria wants the golan back but is unwilling to pay for it. Israel won it in a war that syria started...So what is syrias compensation to Israel and to all the people who died because syria started the war. The first step syria must do is recognize Israel and renounce violence forever against the jewish people. Then lay down its weapons anywhere near the golan, immediately stop sending any weaponry to hezbola and say they will allow any jewish settlements to remain...that is the start of peace talks

  • 3. 0 0
    And what if ......
    • Arnold
    • 25.03.10
    • 03:16

    Israel goes back to 1947 partition with a "peace agreement" that the Arabic countries then decide they want all the land. No Jews allowed. Israel is now in a bad defensive position and this time the Arab armies overtake Israel. What happens then. Does the UN pass resolutions asking nicely for the Arabs to pull back ? Who is going to come to the aid of the Israelis ? My prediction...noone is going to want to get involved. What was suppose to happen in 1947 with the Arab armies attacking and pushing the Jews into the sea will have finally come to pass. What then ???????

  • 2. 0 0
    Arabic chutzpah and the Israeli bashers believe it
    • Arnold
    • 25.03.10
    • 03:07

    There was never any acceptance of Israel based on the 1947 UN partition. To this day there is no acceptance of Israel by Syria, Lebanon, or the Palestinian leadership ( Hamas) yet with any peace deal....before anything is discussed Israel must commit to 100% withdrawl to pre-1967 borders. There is no request of commitment by the world/UN of the Arab countries of ANYTHING. All the Arab countries have to do is just sit there and take. Where is the give ??? What is on the table except land ? To me this is a one sided deal with Israel giving up security without a commited word from THEM.

  • 1. 0 0
    Assad: Syria committed to seeking peace with Israel
    • gideon ben yoash
    • 25.03.10
    • 02:03

    why every timw you run out of destroing israel subject you bring up pissed off syria subject? why