• Published 00:00 07.05.07
  • Latest update 00:00 07.05.07

Archeologist: King Herod's tomb desecrated, but discovery 'high point'

The tomb was discovered by Hebrew University Professor Ehud Netzer, who has been trying to locate it since 1972.

By Haaretz Staff and Amiram Barkat

The archeologist who located King Herod's tomb at Herodium said Tuesday that the grave had been desecrated, apparently shortly after his death, but called the discovery a "high point."

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem announced Monday night that it has uncovered the grave and tomb of Herod, who ruled Judea for the Roman empire from circa 37 BCE.

Professor Ehud Netzer of the university's Institute of Archaeology told reporters Tuesday that the tomb was discovered when a team of researchers found pieces of a limestone sarcophagus believed to belong to the ancient king.

Although there were no bones in the container, he said the sarcophagus' location and ornate appearance indicated it was Herod's.

"It's a sarcophagus we don't just see anywhere," Netzer said. "It is something very special."

Netzer led the team, though he said he was not on the site when the sarcophagus was found.

He said the sarcophagus had been smashed into pieces, most likely by someone seeking revenge on Herod during the great Jewish rebellion of 66-72 CE.

"The discovery of the grave is the high point in the excavation at the site," said Netzer.

The professor, who is considered one of the leading experts on King Herod, has conducted archeological digs at Herodium since 1972 in an attempt to locate the grave and tomb.

The discovery solves one of Israel's greatest archeological mysteries.

The majority of researchers had believed that Herod was in fact buried at Herodium, based on the writings of the ancient Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, but multiple excavations at the site failed to locate the grave.

Netzer's successful dig focused on a different part of the site than previous excavations, between the upper part of Herodium and the site's two palaces.

Herodium, a fortified palace built by Herod some 12 kilometers south of Jerusalem, was destroyed by the Romans in 71 CE.

Herod, whose father and grandfather converted to Judaism, was appointed governor of Galilee at the age of 25 and was made "King of the Jews" by the Roman senate in approximately 40 BCE. He remained king for around 34 years.

Herod, also known as Herod the Great, is credited with expanding the Second Temple and building Caesarea, Masada, and many other monumental construction projects. He died in the year 4 BCE in Jericho after a long illness.

Herod decided to construct his tomb at Herodium because the site played a role in two dramatic events in his life. In the year 43 BCE, when Herod was still governor of the Galilee, he was forced to flee Jerusalem along with his family after his enemies the Parthians laid siege to the city.

His mother's chariot flipped over near Herodium, and Herod became hysterical until he realized she was only lightly wounded. A short while later, the Parthians caught up to Herod and his entourage, although Herod and his men emerged victorious in the ensuing battle.

At Herodium, Herod built one of the largest monarchical complexes in the Roman Empire, which served as a residential palace, a sanctuary, an administrative center and a mausoleum. Herod first built an artificial cone-shaped hill that could be seen from Jerusalem, on which he constructed a fortified palace surrounded by watchtowers that he used solely in wartime.

At the base of the hill, he built an additional palace, which was the size of a small town and known as "Lower Herodium." The palace included many buildings, fancy gardens, pools, stables, and storage areas.

Herod spared no expense in an attempt to turn the site into a regional gem, bringing water from Solomon's Pools and special soil to allow his gardens to blossom in the heart of the desert.

Following Herod's death, his son and heir Archilaus continued to reside and Herodium. After Judea became a Roman province, the site served as a center for Roman prefects.

With the outbreak of the Great Revolt, Herodium was seized by the rebels, but then handed over without resistance to the Romans following the fall of Jerusalem in 70 CE.

Fifty years later, Herodium was also used by the rebels during the Bar Kokhva revolt, but was abandoned thereafter.

In the 5th century CE, the site was settled by Byzantine monks, and then served as a leper colony before being finally abandoned in the 7th century CE.

The first archeological dig at the site, between the years 1956 and 1962, was conducted by a Franciscan monk and revealed most of the currently-known remains. Israel began excavations at the site in 1972, several years after its capture during the Six-Day War.

Herodium is located some 12 kilometers from Jerusalem. (Photo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Web site)

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 463. 0 0
    I am always amused by the use of BCE and CD
    • Steve
    • 02.12.08
    • 08:41

    AD was used in the Julian and Georgian calendars beginning in 525 AD but not in usage in Western Europe until 8th century (the 700's) and still becoming more common between the 11th and 14th centuries. Portugal was the last country to adapt the system in 1422 AD. Prior to 525 AD, years were measured by the period of time in which a sovereign ruled - a system which was entirely regionalized (their king ain't MY king, so we have different calendars!) In Spain, it might be the "3rd year of Queen Isabella's reign," while at the same moment in England, it was it might be "14th year of Henry II's reign." Is that why people said, "Ok King, live forever!?" just so they wouldn't get confused over what point in time they lived?

  • 462. 0 0
    King Herod's tomb
    • james peloquin
    • 24.11.08
    • 23:58

    I believe I am a direct decedent of King Herod. Part of my ancestral Tomb was recently uncovered in Herodium. My Grandfather was Wiiliam Homer Hearod Jr. son of William Homer Hearod Sr.. Due to a long Family dispute the name was changed from Herod to Hearod. Blame Christianity for this. I Believe my Family and it?s descendents have a stake in the Herod discovery. Please respond to this e-mail , as I am consulting a DNA Authority to perform DNA testing on any potential DNA that can be recovered from the tomb and it?s contents to members of my family.

  • 461. 0 0
    thats why there is also
    • david
    • 12.06.08
    • 10:50

    b.c.e.- before the common era, and c.e.- common era.

  • 460. 0 0
    Finding Herods Tomb
    • Dave
    • 07.02.08
    • 14:56

    The find of Herods tomb has significance in history. He not only had this but the Masada and is also linked to the Jewish temple. Hopefully they can find some information if it there regarding the precise location of the Temple Mount. Currently I am zeroing in on its exact location. Keep in mind the outside walls of the mount were left intact, and the writings of Josephus is proving correct that the temple itself was totally destroyed even its foundations uprooted leaving no trace of its existence. Now with our technology today, it is definitely on the southern part of the mount and the key is finding the ghiron waters which is on the bottom of the southeastern corner of the temple mount walls. Also the Muslims and or Moslems and or Islamics have no business being on this mount in the first place. It purely does belong to the Jewish people period. The temple itself is right under the current Mosque on the southern part and the fortress was also on the mount but north.

  • 459. 0 0
  • 458. 0 0
    Not true
    • Joshua
    • 08.01.08
    • 00:33

    Actually if you trace Jesus lineage through his mother Mary, then you will see that he comes fromthe priestly line of david. It is a priestly line by label, and a royal line by blood lineage (being from the house of David). Many of the things you wrote toward the end ar true for the most part, but Jesus also fulfilled the scriptures written Him. When God does something, He does it right -- right from beginning to end.

  • 457. 0 0
    #151 scotty
    • danny
    • 04.12.07
    • 02:01

    the reason that jesus is not mentioned in this article is because he is irrelevent as far as facts on the ground are concerned.ther is,and never was any scientific,or archialogical proof that he ever existed. his name has never appeared in any of the texts written at that time,neither by josephius flavious or any other roman(or jewish) scribes of the time.even with all the texts of the dead sea scrolls jesus fails to get even the slightest mention.

  • 456. 0 0
    bracelet
    • patricia young
    • 24.09.07
    • 20:27

    hello, i have been recearching this bracelet , the new show on discovery channell the true story of noahs ark , noah was wearing an identical bracelet .i would like to send you pictures of the bracelet e mail thank you

  • 455. 0 0
    herod
    • vernon chism
    • 15.09.07
    • 21:08

    it has been a long time coming

  • 454. 0 0
    Israeli Land
    • John Turner
    • 13.06.07
    • 12:29

    Have you ever considered the Native American claim that your country is occupying their land?

  • 453. 0 0
    land part of israel
    • Dina
    • 12.06.07
    • 11:18

    technically it is part of "palestine" it's 10 minutes from bethlehem in the occupied territories. on the top of the mount you can see all the illegal settlements which have been built since the capture in 1967. The Israeli flag flies high, but in any just peace accord this land must be given to a future palestinian state, with joint jewish and non jewish care for the site, which is so important to judaism.

  • 452. 0 0
    story at UN
    • Dina
    • 12.06.07
    • 11:15

    you're an idiot. land belongs to land.

  • 451. 0 0
    RE: 2 billion people want to know....
    • Paul
    • 26.05.07
    • 02:30

    The current world population is 6,602,224,175. I am sure your 2 billion don't care what the other 4,602,224,175 of us think.

  • 450. 0 0
    Herod's Tomb
    • Amardeep Manhas
    • 17.05.07
    • 10:01

    In the last 100 years, there have been countless discoveries, just recently the place where John the Baptist would annoint his followers, then the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Nag Hammadi Library, the gospel of Judas Iscariot. These are just some that I happen to be familiar with, unfortunately the public sometimes has to wait years afterwards to learn about the discovery.

  • 449. 0 0
    Oh Israel
    • Paula
    • 17.05.07
    • 01:29

    Your God is so alive and already saved you with a sacrifice of the one who did not deceive, did not come to set up his kingdom but do you not see His kingdom was not of this world but the kingdom of heaven through your love of Him. Your creator/our creator walked with Adam in the garden as a Father who loves his son as recorded by your very own Moses the deliverer..he wants us to love Him with true love of the heart. I weep for the ones who's eyes will not see till they are fooled by the false messsiah. The true King has been here and He's coming back to save us from ourselves and to claim the ones who love Him. :)

  • 448. 0 0
    For Paula
    • Zephaniah 3:17
    • 16.05.07
    • 18:08

    17 The LORD your God is with you, he is mighty to save. He will take great delight in you, he will quiet you with his love, he will rejoice over you with singing."

  • 447. 0 0
    Oh, how He sings when we hear!!!
    • Virginia
    • 16.05.07
    • 17:49

    Hey Paula, you are sooo right, it is that "still small voice", keep listening, praying, praising and rejoicing!! Must have been the same Censor here yesterday as at the article titled "To Fly Or Not To Flags". Two or three of my posts prior to the one regarding the advertisment were omitted.

  • 446. 0 0
    I know...final
    • Paula
    • 16.05.07
    • 01:31

    proclaim He is the lord of lords...from the beginning in Genesis to the end of the book in Revelations...it was a roadmap of the Glory of God through His Son...all stories told in it was of Christs lineage and setting up of his First coming and the ending with His Second Coming and final judgement. The only thing is who is the lord of your life?? Who do you love? God is my first love! I have grown enough to know my forehead already has the mark of Christ on it...I will not bear the mark of the beast which will be coming sooner than you think..yeah! I cant wait!

  • 445. 0 0
    I know...part 2
    • Paula
    • 16.05.07
    • 01:28

    I had that yard ornament for over a year and hadnt thought much about it but when I wasnt thinking it came to me through that quiet voice that I love you, I died for you and through my death the scars on my hand proves that your name is written in the Lambs Book of Life..you see you are written through the palms of my hands...so you see David...it was prophetic! Well that would be great but doesnt stop there...the next day I went to work and emailed my mentor and told her of the realization and she said it sounds like he came and sat down with you and spent time with you didnt he? and I almost lost it! that was what I prayed for!! do you think that is coincidence?? if you do then you are missing God...my Father knows me by name and He loves me...thank you the Great I am...I have seen many things like this ever since..you better believe because one day you will bend knee and proclaim Jesus is the Messiah and you will realize that both the OT and NT was nothing more than the

  • 444. 0 0
    I know...
    • Paula
    • 16.05.07
    • 01:23

    The truth and the truth has set me free! If you become a true Christian and love Christ with all your heart then you know without a doubt that your not blindly following a God that has no substance David...how can you tell me that the things that I have heard and seen are not real? You see God could be but not always in the earthquakes, wind, fire and anything else overwhelmingly powerful but in the small still quiet voice...for example, last fall I was upset and went out to my car to pray and I put on a cd by Celtic Woman with the song "You Raise Me Up" and I was praying for God to show himself...I wanted that big powerful showing and I looked around and up and down the road...I prayed that he comes and manifests himself and sit with me that I was so in need of the very presence of Him. IN my tears, I looked over and seen a yard ornament that looks like a rock and on it it had a verse from Isaiah that says that he has my name engraved on the palm of his hands...I was shocked...I had

  • 443. 0 0
    I almost agree with the Aurthor of Accidential Christ in that
    • Virginia
    • 15.05.07
    • 23:10

    he says, "I believe that the greatest evil in the world today is religion used for political ends. For the sake of life on this planet it must stop." I agree it is a great evil and to his follow-up sentence 100% Misusing the Word of God is in the 3rd commandment, before that is idolatry (putting anything or anyone before God) and before that, the first and greatest commandment, the greatest evil in all the world is putting other "Gods" before Him. Messiah said plainly, the Father is greater than I. Christ was certainly no accident. If His words were not the Words of the Father, who would even begin to supose they would still be so prevalent 2000 years later! Not to mention so life altering. One would have to be of divine thickness :) Anyone else catch that advertisement atop this talkback? Anyone read the book?

  • 442. 0 0
    My quest began. The first thing I realized was that
    • Virginia
    • 15.05.07
    • 19:22

    you cannot connect very well to the Spirit of God under the influence of the "spirits" in alcohol. I was young, early twenties, so I decided rather than chose one over the other, I would give each equal time. "To everything there is a season" right? A time to party and a time to stand before the throne of our Creator. And so I did. Partying I had no problem with. Standing before the throne of our Creator on the other hand posed a BIG problem. I could talk, talk, talk just fine. And when I was all talked out, having come to the conclusion that what I really needed to be doing was listening... Oh no, where do I begin?

  • 441. 0 0
    David, I could not be where I am without having once doubted.
    • Virginia
    • 15.05.07
    • 18:53

    There was a time in my life I saw clearly the effect my parents (one, a very zealous, religeous Lutheran, the other an alcoholic; as a result of the drowning death of their 23 month old child when I was just 8 months old) and childhood teachings (from them and others) had on me. I found myself with a Bible in one hand, a beer in the other and a blaring light shown through, the realization that, "Oh my God, I'm my parents!" I didn't want to be my parents. So my jouney began... Who am I?

  • 440. 0 0
  • 439. 0 0
    Yes, Virginia, freedom from thinking
    • David Teich
    • 15.05.07
    • 09:33

    "where faith replaced our doubts", no, where faith replaced reason. There's a prayer said long ago at Friday night services at a Hillel I attended years ago. The opening line was "Doubt is the handmaiden of truth". You'll notice that is the key difference between Judaism and the two more junior Western religions of Christianity and Islam. Blind faith, without doubt, consideration and reason, is the way to ignorance and excess. That you take the very self-contradictory text in the NT & OT and blindly choose to believe one interpretation of that text shows that doubt scares you. Faith and absolutism are what matters. That way lies jihad...

  • 438. 0 0
    ABSOLUTLELY!
    • Paula
    • 14.05.07
    • 20:32

    The King is coming

  • 437. 0 0
    Hallelu Yah!!! Our deliverer is coming...
    • Virginia
    • 14.05.07
    • 16:06

    Our deliverer is standing by!!!!!!

  • 436. 0 0
    Coming to the Father. The only true freedom.
    • Virginia
    • 14.05.07
    • 14:48

    Once we too were filled with doubt, with fears, with guilt and with shame to great to bear, for we were never meant to bear it. Feeling sure that if we admitted our guilt, justice would prepare our certain death. Longing to be right with our Heavenly Father, no matter the cost, we stood before Him laying all of our doubts, fears, guilt and shame at His feet. Our Father?s loving embrace was indescribable, purely divine. We were brought to new life, not even realizing we indeed had died, it was as in the twinkling of an eye. We were raised to new life, where faith replaced our doubts, Love replaced our fears, forgiveness and the ability to forgive replaced our guilt and gratitude and everlasting praise replaced our shame.

  • 435. 0 0
    Amen! Paula - Reminds me of something I once wrote in a prayer
    • Virginia
    • 14.05.07
    • 14:43

    journal, which I'll share in my next post. In part for the sake of our friend Akram, as I sense he is being "called by His Name" [Word] Prayer has been laid upon my heart for him. Will you be my prayer partner in asking our Creator God to reveal Himself to our friend Akram Zekaria, that he may know Him and by knowing Him will know his own purpose in God's perfect plan. In Jesus Name, according to His Word - Amen

  • 434. 0 0
    Virginia...checked it out...
    • Paula
    • 13.05.07
    • 04:05

    All we can do is give up our sins to the Messiah who came when this rotten king Herod was running crazy killing babies because he was afraid of the coming king..hmmm...wonder why? Anyway, keep God first...seek Him always...grow in the Spirit and you will be there to watch it all unfold when the Jews realize that Jesus was their Messiah because we will be at His side! YEAH!! :)

  • 433. 0 0
    What is our part?
    • Virginia
    • 12.05.07
    • 23:38

    To believe that God has done this for us. To return to The Holy One of Israel, having died to self, that we may live to Him. As He lived to serve us, we will live to serve Him. (with great joy, not as a slave) It was fortold that the eyes of the Jews would be closed until the numbers of the Gentiles be forfilled. These are God's people, He will not lose even one. Some will be spared later day suffering and some will not. However, scripture tells us that "all of Israel will be saved". I would highly recommend listening to the video's Paula suggests to me in #423, pray and continue in the Word. Because you were right in that...therein are all the answers individually and nationally.

  • 432. 0 0
    OT Scripture also tells us that "everything that is going to
    • Virginia
    • 12.05.07
    • 22:37

    happen, has already happened". Here we get into, fate,destiny, predestiny and it all becomes very complex. No need to go there. The only thing we need to know is that when Messiah took on the sins of the world as OT scripture tells us He would, this was every sin of every man from the begining to the end of time as we know it. He knew you and I, every hair on our heads and every sin we've commited and may have yet to commit, as He hung there on the cross. Giving us OPPORTUNITY for salvation. Notice I did not say certainty of salvation. We have a part in it too. Conclusion comming

  • 431. 0 0
    Akram, the 3 days Messiah spent from death to resurrection
    • Virginia
    • 12.05.07
    • 22:15

    where by no means "days of rest". He took upon Himself the sin of the world and paid the penalty for it. OT Scriptures tell us, "without the shedding of blood, there can be no remission of sin". This is the only thing NT Scriptures "added" without taking one iota from OT scriptures, and that is the forfillment of promised salvation, the shedding of the blood of God's own "lamb" He prepared the sacrifice for us just as He did for Abraham, when Abraham was willing to sacrifice Isaac. Will be continued.

  • 430. 0 0
    421# Virginia. You are right God doesn't need three days of rest!
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 12.05.07
    • 21:13

    Virginia. You made it beautifully in your post 431#. And I mean it. May I add: To follow the word of G-d is the solution for all problems; personal & international. G-d did not give us the brain to close it. For whatever its worth, all that came after the words of G-d through Abraham is enough. All that came later is crape, distorted variations on a holy thyme. That created only disention and conflict the antipathy to the main massage. It added nothing to G-d's massage. Only if they learn.. My posts 'God & Man' is just for that.Leave the crape; ungodly,descention and distortion. God doesn't need three days of rest !

  • 429. 0 0
    4) 363# Amos. God & Man.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 12.05.07
    • 19:13

    Abraham discovery of G-d is like Einstein discovery of the fourth dimension. Both started with mental exercise. Everything is the result of pure mental thinking.All that Man achieved, big & small,harmful or useful started with pure thinking. Our ineer-self is the source of all Man's created. That is what Abraham did in his discovery of the monistic G-d. That is the superiority of the first monistic Jewish religion. Those dormant cells in the human brain are not there just to cure his body. They are there to increase his knowldge to higher understanding and to be trained for higher purposes, kowingly or unknowingly man uses his dormant brain cells to increase the knowldge of his own self. Like what he started doing since the very minute of his creation. The road is there. The journey started with Abraham who teaches us we search for G-d within us..Moses leaded the way..Jews are meant to follow..All the rest are still in the wilderness.

  • 428. 0 0
    Paula, I watched the video. Indeed we are close.
    • Virginia
    • 12.05.07
    • 15:59

    Check this out. http://livinginmyownworld.com/the-big-hug-the-old-city-of-jerusalem/ Cosmic gate about to be opened on May 21, 2007?

  • 427. 0 0
    One of these christian...
    • Alfred
    • 12.05.07
    • 15:10

    There is no contradiction. True, Herod died around 4 BC and true that Jesus was born before Herod's death. The culprit is Diogenes Exiguus, who was ordered by Justinian the Great to change the chronology from the begining of Rome to the birth of Christ. Diogenes made a simple mathematical mistake creating a few years of difference where there was none.

  • 426. 0 0
    317: Pam, before you spout, READ!!!
    • David Teich
    • 12.05.07
    • 14:40

    "Christians were first persecuted BY people of the Jewish faith." Wrong again. The first Christians were Jews, my child, thinking that Jesus was the old testament messiah. When they had to rationalize his death, that slowly changed, but for at least a century they argued about whether they should only prosltyze Jews or also non-Jews. As both groups were minorities, neither was doing much to the other. However, it's clear that Christians began writing very bad things about Jews while the opposite wasn't done. As soon as Christians came to power (Constantine) serious persecution was automatic. Read "Christian Antisemitism" and other similar studies before you spout non-supported nonsense.

  • 425. 0 0
    Peter, sadly, they've been right
    • David Teich
    • 12.05.07
    • 14:36

    Most of the world has been pretty stupid. It's too easy to think "if only the Jews are gone, the Muslims will calm down" rather than pay attention to history.

  • 424. 0 0
    108: Joe, ROTFL! You're just too silly (3rd try)
    • David Teich
    • 12.05.07
    • 14:35

    "last I heard Arabs live there." Well, duh, puppy. Read about a little thing called "jihad" "southern Arabia as their ancestors". How long ago? Does the record showing all of us came out of Africa make us all Africans? Because Greeks controlled Arabia for a time, does that make Greeks born there "Arabs"? The Nabateans were a people centered on Petra, completely distinct from the Arab of the time. That's clear from the records. "Greek": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabatea says "By the third century the Nabateans had stopped writing in Aramaic and begun writing in Greek instead." BTW: it also mentions "The new Arab invaders". Finally, so, if most Arabs' history here goes back so far, why'd UNRWA need t say a "refugee" was someone who'd only been here two years?

  • 423. 0 0
    Virginia...check out...
    • Paula
    • 12.05.07
    • 03:31

    endtime.com watch video for free or listen to the radio broadcasts for free...I recommend to listen to 666:satans masterplan and signposts of the second coming...I think you would find them interesting....

  • 422. 0 0
    Virginia
    • Paula
    • 11.05.07
    • 23:58

    Yes, I'm here! Seems not as many are supporting the true God these days nor will recongnize the Messiah...I find it sad ;(

  • 421. 0 0
    Hi Akram, I meant Hi Akram in my 419 post, but that's okay, Hi to
    • Virginia
    • 11.05.07
    • 17:31

    all who are still with us. Akram, I hear you. And we can all be thankful that we ARE capable of "unlearning" and "relearning". Myself for example, I was raised to believe that Sunday was the Sabbath day. Upon looking to Scripture, I learned otherwise. And when the teaching comes directly from the Word of God, it stands. To "unlearn and "relearn" is not an easy process, one must Trust God, and "lean not on their own understanding."

  • 420. 0 0
    Hey Paula, I will...Go, holding His banner high-because
    • Virginia
    • 11.05.07
    • 15:11

    His banner over me is LOVE!!! Hallelu Yah!!! Are you still out there?

  • 419. 0 0
    321# Virgina. 'Ruler & Rule' is a calture.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 11.05.07
    • 15:05

    Virgina,there is a lot of truth in your post. The fact is the 'ruler & rule' is a reflection of the Islamic tribal calture. We can see that today, most Islamic,specially in Arab countries, can't opt out of being ruled by leaders. It is either the people are too lazy to think for themselves and opt for change or it is the fault of the leaders who always try opression to control people through dependence. It is a calture that goes back long way in Arab social History.I can be right in saying the imperialist role in Arab countries encourages that for Romantic, imperialistic, easy domination purposes. The meoimperialism always used the policy of containment, once they started to use the policy of intervention and change they landed themselves and the Arab countries in the mess that we can see now. The Koran in some verses tried to change that. Mainly in a very famouse verse: Jugement is to be debated between you'.

  • 418. 0 0
    Hi Amos #416 brings to mind...
    • Virginia
    • 11.05.07
    • 14:49

    "Once, having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Messiah replied, "The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, nor will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is,' because the kingdom of God is within you." Luke 17:20-21 Blessings, looking forward to part 4 Lost this thread for a while, thanks Rosner for keeping it active.

  • 417. 0 0
    response to #412 honest
    • Mike
    • 11.05.07
    • 04:14

    You may question why the Jewish writers wrote what they did in the Babylonian Talmud (3 mentions of Jesus c. AD180 not AD600) but I only responded to your flat mis-statement. You said there was no mention of Jesus outside the Bible (in other words, no mention of Jesus other than by his followers). I am glad you agree with me and the list of at least 9 sources that I gave you. Now that you have admitted that Jesus was a historical fact, the argument now is whether you believe who He said He was. We will not settle that discussion in this little chat. That is a matter of belief. I was only adressing your mis-representation of history. The data I gave you was fact not faith.

  • 416. 0 0
    3)363#Amos. God & Man
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 11.05.07
    • 02:57

    Amos.In my posts 406-411#I tried to show by its very nature Earthly Science is not qualified for the searh for God. Further more, one should consider the different rules and laws that control the other parts of the Universe.The Universal Sciences. God is not the creator of the Planet Earth only. All the Universe must be created by ONE GOD. One can safely conclude now, that the search for God can not be the perogative of Earthly Science like Evolution and other primative theories and hypothesis. Man always looked for his discoveries outside himself. Because, the first start of Man's search, was for tools to help him in his daily life. We can see that even in animals. The Search for God is Not like the search for tools; which is the main concern of Earthly Science. The search for God should start within himself; exactly what Abraham did. The first Monotheist that discover G-d that lives in him. (to be continued)

  • 415. 0 0
    The Trinity in Christianity
    • Aida Irizarry
    • 11.05.07
    • 02:53

    You know, when you see the trinity as the aspect of the One God, you can better get a grasp of the teaching. Aida

  • 414. 0 0
    Is This The Same Herod
    • Aida Irizarry
    • 11.05.07
    • 02:48

    Actually, Herod didn't wash his hands. Pontius Pilate did. But this is the same Herod who lived in Jesus' time and who had John the Baptist decapitated, and killed all children under age of 2 in an effort to kill Jesus as well.

  • 413. 0 0
    Reverse Probably True.......
    • Chris for Alan
    • 10.05.07
    • 20:50

    I strongly desagree with your opinion of the Arabs and their claim to the holy land. A Jewish presence in the holy land is well documented by almost all archaeologists since iron age 1. It was not until general Titus, at the end of the first century, conquered jerusalem and emporer hadrian ordered the dispersion of the jews that israel became known as "palestinia" and jerusalem was renamed "aelia capotalina". It was after this that beduin tribes bigan to move into the area. Furthermore Israel is not excavating under the temple mount as the arabs have controlled the temple mount since 1968 when general moishe dayan captured Jerusalem and then returned control of the temple mount to the arabs. It is the arabs who are building and underground mosque that are destroying evidence of both the solomonic and herodian temples.

  • 412. 0 0
    Mike: Be honest about the Babylonian Talmud and Jesus
    • David Teich
    • 10.05.07
    • 10:33

    First, there is not consensus as to whether or not Jesus was mentioned there. More importantly, lets assume you may be right. That Talmud can be traced to 600 CE. Is there any surprise that, 600 years after his death, when anti-Jewish persecution at the hands of Christians was an established fact, that writers of the Talmud might have referred to the man behind the movement? It wasn't precognition, it wasn't agreeing that he was what Christians claim he is, it would simply have been recognition of the cause of massive amounts of mistreatment and persecution.

  • 411. 0 0
    2)363#Amos. On God & Man
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 10.05.07
    • 07:06

    "God must not be blamed for Man's deeds" 406#. On your post363# You blamed God for all the misgivings Man brought upon himself.What God has to do with that?The "primitive""holy books" you mentioned on 363# ignored the fact that God knew Man is not perfect(Genesis).If God wants Man to be perfec,He would have made him with 'perfect genes'.God clearly told Man he should be responsible for his actions.(Genesis). So,all that happend to Man is Man's responsibility.God should NOT be blamed,406#. You added:"OH I see 'holy books' reflect more the issues of the time'. So, what the 'unholy books' reflect,Amos ?Certainly the 'unperfect knowledge''Man's Ignorance'?Ofcourse it does. The fact that there is no constancy in the unholy books is a proof of that.Remember what I said 406# "because of its very nature science should be excluded from the search for God". It can't be otherwise.How could it be ?! The truth is Science changable and unreliable. (to be continued).

  • 410. 0 0
    respond to #378 again
    • Mike
    • 10.05.07
    • 03:59

    Ran out of space on the other answer. Here is a list of just a few non-Christian (pagan) references to Jesus: Cornelius Tacitus (AD64)- Roman historian Suetonius (AD90)- Roman historian Pliny the Younger (AD90) - Roman historian Lucian of Samosata (AD100) - Egyptian official Mara Bar-Serapion (AD75) - Syrian prisoner Thallus (AD52) - Syrian historian Roman Nero inscription at Lusitania (AD68) Babylonian Talmud (AD140) - Jewish reference Flavius Josephus (AD90) - Jewish reference No references outside the Bible? You need to study. Plus I suspect there will more discovered in the future especially if Pontius Pilate's writings are ever discovered.

  • 409. 0 0
    Response to #378
    • Mike
    • 10.05.07
    • 03:28

    I was hoping someone would bring this reference about Jesus being mentioned in Josephus. No one disputes the reference to Jesus in the writings of Josephus. Not one person. The only dispute is the reference "if you want to call him a man for he was the Messiah". The reference to Jesus is not disputed. The dispute is whether Josephus would call him "the Messiah". The 4 earliest known copies of Josephus ALL include this reference. Early Christian writers such as Eusebius (AD260) quote Josephus and they include the disputed passage in their quotes. Again, there is no proof that Josephus did not write this, only conjecture. The Babylonian Talmud includes a reference about Jesus. Pliny the Younger (Governor) mentions Jesus and Cornelius Tacitus (A Roman Historian in the 1st Century - The Annals of Rome) mentions Jesus being crucified in Judea. Don't forget. No one disputes the references in Josephus to James and John The Baptist.

  • 408. 0 0
    hey Virigina
    • Paula
    • 10.05.07
    • 02:32

    You go girl! God bless :)

  • 407. 0 0
    clickfool
    • Paula
    • 10.05.07
    • 02:31

    Clickfool, did you miss who I was talking about?? I didnt mention John...I was talking about the Son of God...Jesus...in what you quoted me on. He is not a lie...read the OT and find out that there was prophecy on His coming and death and ressurection then read the NT and find out it did come to pass.

  • 406. 0 0
    363# Amos. On God & Man.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 09.05.07
    • 21:54

    Amos;Tough words though beautiful."We could go down the list in the Torah"Did you ever noticed the Torah has two characters God & Man ? You can only judge the Totah by separating one from the other.This is what you didn't do Amos. You put the shoes in the wrong foot.You blamed the father for the sins of the son. Also you can't treat this as a Frankenstien story.Then you continued saying"From evolution to the idea that god is a man in the sky" Besides the fact there is nothing called (up)sky,you made god looks a silly old man.As for evolution what this has to do with it?Darwin said nothing about Creation!Science is the re-correction of its old mistakes; much like the Arabian 'Onethousand nights & night';you end up where you start.Because of its very nature science should be excluded from the search for God. To sum up now:God must not be blamed for Man's deeds.God should not be searched through science. So,where is God and where can be found ? (will be continued)

  • 405. 0 0
    amos...don't just believe anybody...
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 21:53

    be a berean[they didn't just believe anybody when it comes to spiritual matters-they searched and studied the bible for themselves]....warning against idolatry: deuteronomy 13:3 thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet,or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the Lord you God with all your heart and with all your soul........is that a picture of [muhammad]....I may be wrong.

  • 404. 0 0
    amos...if you're not a Christian...
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 21:45

    you would never understand what I tried to say....here's in 1 corinthians 2:14 but the natural man[non-believer] receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them,because they're spiritually discerned. ....have you not read my previous post-peter was not the first pope.he had not been to rome. ....in mark 1:30 but simon's[peter]wife's mother lay sick of a fever, and anon they tell him of her.Jesus, is the ROCK of our salvation and not Peter.....1 corinthians 1:23 but we preach Christ crucified, unto the jews a stumbling block, and unto the Greeks[gentiles]foolishness......who's crazy then,amos?you or I....I depend on my bible and read some good christians literatures.

  • 403. 0 0
    Herod sounds familiar
    • D.P.
    • 09.05.07
    • 21:40

    He killed thousands of babies and Bethlehem and now they're celbrating his life like a hero. Hmmm...rings a bell. Well who knows maybe he can run for P.M.

  • 402. 0 0
    #3's logic
    • Poshnir
    • 09.05.07
    • 21:35

    Interesting... Isn't Palenstine a word derived from "Philistines", as in "land of Philistines"? Weren't they one of th groups that occupied the land as Joshua and tribes came into fight off their 'promised land'? Weren't those the people that God then said they should now get to stay in the 'promised land' as a thorn in Israel's side due to Israel's disobedience by not removing them right away (and instead inter-married with them). Aren't the Philistines there to test Israel as to whether they will truly live in peace with them like the Patriarchs had to do? Book of Judges 2 "Therefore the LORD was very angry with Israel and said, "Because this nation has violated the covenant that I laid down for their forefathers and has not listened to me, 21 I will no longer drive out before them any of the nations Joshua left when he died. 22 I will use them to test Israel and see whether they will keep the way of the LORD and walk in it as their forefathers did."

  • 401. 0 0
    sorry to say,snakie...a lot of you here won't agree with..
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 21:30

    we're not all God's children...being good won't get you to heaven either,killing to please your allah won't get you to heaven,but to your own paradise[not heaven].there is no sin in heaven. ......galatians 3:26 for ye are all the children of God...........here's the catch,snakie......by faith in Christ Jesus.if mother teresa...put her faith in good works and not in Jesus...she's not in heaven.God Almighty gave us a choice---some choose hell and some heaven.God is love,but He is the God of Judgment also.I think you're a muslim.

  • 400. 0 0
    King Herod's tomb
    • harriet
    • 09.05.07
    • 20:58

    I find it very interesting to see that King Herod's was "discovered". According to Haaretz though, it was also discovered by a monk in the 70's, so what is so wonderful about THIS news? Obviously the place is well know to many and has been there for almost 2,000 years, and since it has already been visited, why all the uproar!

  • 399. 0 0
    Kingg Herod's tomb
    • Juan Carlos Lara
    • 09.05.07
    • 19:10

    Congratulations to Prof. Netzer and his team for this great discovery. I was very glad when I yesterday saw him on the Spanish television, and I remembered the afternoons of the 1990/91 course attending his exciting lessons after the Gulf War in the Hebrew University.

  • 398. 0 0
    And PS, thank you for that Click, it matters not that I know
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 14:34

    the words you've shared with me. I am as dull has the next human being and need constant reminding, lest I forget. So thank you for that blessing. May God bless you too.

  • 397. 0 0
    # 396 How is that in disagreement with anything I said?
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 14:26

    You are Loving God first, by exulting His Word here. If you are living by this Word, you are putting God first. Click, you are no fool in this. It is the Word that sanctifies the Name, not the other way around. In the 3rd commandment when God said, "you shall not misuse the Name of the Lord your God", this not only refered to the name we call Him, it also refers to His Word. The only right use of it is to bring men to Him. Not exult ourselves or our people. Or God forbid, prove our point in error as Satan tried to do in his tempting of Messiah. His Word is the "Sword of the Spirit" and we must be very careful in wielding it.

  • 396. 0 0
    For Virginia # 395
    • Clickfool
    • 09.05.07
    • 13:25

    I hate to disagree with you, Virginia, but didn't Jesus: "If any one says, "I love God," and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen." (1 John 4:20)

  • 395. 0 0
    # 392 Clickfool, before we can "love one another" we must
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 11:35

    love God. God is Love. And the source of all that is. When our relationship is right with God, it is right with one another.

  • 394. 0 0
    # 390 Clickfool, people who worship Jesus do not
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 11:31

    worship the man and the "lifestyle" He lived. They worship the Spirit of the Father within Him. This was the purpose for His coming, to reconcile us as one with Him to the Father. In worshiping Him, we worship the Father. He said plainly, "I and the Father are one." and "the words I speak are not mine, they are the Father's who sent me." and "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life, no one comes to the Father except through me." The only way to the Father is through the Father's Word. Yeshua/Jesus is the Father's Word incarnate. Like I said to Amos, ask and you will receive.

  • 393. 0 0
    # 367 Amos, If that is the goal of Islam, they are not going
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 11:11

    about it as our Creator does. And if that is the hope of Islam, there is real hope for peace. Our Creator knew the price of His gift of free will before He gave it. He knew some would choose to go their own way, He knew of the idolatry, suffering and violence, which He hates. He also knew their would be those, who of their own free will would Love Him and obey Him, surrender all that they are to Him of their own free will. This was more valuable to Him than the creatures (angels) He made without free-will. And desireable enough to endure the cost. God draws the love of man with Love, not insistance. It is written: "We Love Him because He first Loved us." 1 John 4:19 - Blessings - Ask our Creator to reveal Himself to you, all who ask, receive. Knowing Him is indeed our greatest blessing.

  • 392. 0 0
    For Paula # 328
    • Clickfool
    • 09.05.07
    • 09:54

    "I trust a God who loves all of us and wants to be good to each other as we would ourselves and calls us to Him through His Son`s sacrifice for our sakes" There's an interesting story about St John, the only Apostle to die a natural death (all the rest suffered terrible martyrs' deaths for their preaching of the Gospel, which is in itself a comment about a religion that is supposedly founded on a lie). It is clear from the history of the early Christian Church that St John lived to a ripe old age. It is said that at the very end of his life, as a Christian "superstar", he was constantly being asked by young followers for advice. By the end he had boiled it all down to one thing; "Love one another. That is enough."

  • 391. 0 0
    For Kath # 276
    • Clickfool
    • 09.05.07
    • 09:41

    "Why don`t you two get together " Things are moving fast, Kath. Her flight to London is already booked, and by Friday we will be very busy discussing the Palestinian position.

  • 390. 0 0
    For Harold in Guatemala, on Jesus # 256
    • Clickfool
    • 09.05.07
    • 09:23

    The concept of a God who consists of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit has always caused me problems, Harold. I still haven't reconciled this and probably never will. I can't see, for example, why an all-powerful, omnipresent God would need a Holy Spirit, and I have a feeling Jesus, who certainly existed, would be horrified to find himself worshipped. Curiously enough, Hindus have no problems with the concept of a Trinity. Chatting to some Hindu friends a while back I was surprised to discover that Hinduism is monotheistic, and Brahmā, Vishnu and Shiva are simply three aspects of the one God.

  • 389. 0 0
    For Yael S # 253
    • Clickfool
    • 09.05.07
    • 09:10

    "So... are you from London? Maybe we can hook up to discuss your philosophy next time I`m in town." I'm always ready to discuss the Palestinian position with attractive ladies, Yael. Let me know the next time you are in time.

  • 388. 0 0
    #303 Say, Kath, have you taken to gnawing
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 08:59

    on Haaretz too? If they didn't post your BS, in their good and reasonable judgment, they decided it was just that. I am just gonna have make it a point to look in every day and point out whatever is the lie of the day flavor. It makes not one whit of difference what you are selling, truth is truth, and it is not what you can make the jury believe it is. Unfortunately for you, and those who think like you, the eye of the world is on your mess over there and they are weighing it in the balance, and it has been found wanting. Every time you tell somebody that the Pals are a mirage, it speaks of your mindset and it deserves comment. I hope right minded Jews take you to task and continue to point out, despite your hateful posts to them for doing so, that your views do not represent those of many Jews and as such you should only speak for yourself; the views are bigoted and lack any hint of veracity by any standards;the "ilk" must expose it. Regards.

  • 387. 0 0
    LF,Edwin
    • Rita
    • 09.05.07
    • 08:41

    I agree with u Edwin. People keep will try all their best to change the whole story.

  • 386. 0 0
    #211 Mark I am glad you pointed
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 08:26

    out important facts for this poster. He apparently has no concept of cause and effect, poor lad. Regards.

  • 385. 0 0
    LEGITIMATE CLAIMS
    • indrajaya
    • 09.05.07
    • 08:24

    Israelis would say, this is a undeniable "prove" (sich!) that Israel has a legitimate claim on west bank and East Jerusalem. What a clever and coordinative moves on the part of Zionist "scientist" and Israel government. WOW.

  • 384. 0 0
    Hey there Terrornator; say I didn't post
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 08:00

    #300, so they must be messing with the numbering. I don't recall any "street" language I've used; perhaps we have a different view of what "street" language is. However, you and I have our stuff straight. You know me, if I get an out of pocket post, I certainly can be out of pocket. Feel free to comment on my posts any time. Regards. Ballistic.

  • 383. 0 0
    maria - Jihad Maria
    • Snakie
    • 09.05.07
    • 07:23

    We are ALL God's Children...Mother Teresa, a favorite child, Pope John Paul, a good man, WE ARE ALL GODS CHILDREN....as a Christian you must believe that God created A NEW covenant with man, through Christ, so that only through him, ONLY, can man enter heaven, no jew, no muslim, no one, can enter BUT through him...and you say? and wow unto those who send their brother and sisters to hell, as only god can do that...may they be cast out!

  • 382. 0 0
    Malka
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 07:22

    That's great Malka. I agree that your ancestors weren't trying to be politically correct in the 1800's, only anti-Christian. I would like to point out, we aren't trying to change your calendar.

  • 381. 0 0
    Franco - The Lord is Jesus
    • Moses
    • 09.05.07
    • 07:20

    Yes, it says the year of the lord, and year ONE is his birth...who's? Jesus. BC = BEFORE CHRIST This is the Calendar of western civilization, created by the Romans and numerically started on the day the Holy Roman Catholic Church deemed that Jesus Christ, The Messiah, was born. Although they were off by a few years. That's why Catholics (and 1500 years later Protestants) never have to stop an think when Christ was born, just check the Calendar...2007 years ago.

  • 380. 0 0
    The Circle of Life Maria, we are all connected PEACE
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 07:15

    Maria Amos = Jew Jew = Atheist Atheist = Universalist Universalist = Christian Christian = Muslim Muslim = Judaism Judaism = Buddhism Buddhism = Hinduism The one big lie in the world, is that we are seperate, we are all connected. PEACE MARIA Good Night :-)

  • 379. 0 0
    Kath
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 07:13

    Kath, I'm not confusing the issue. If you had went back through all of the posts to find the two previous posts that the one you read was referring to, you would understand what I am "waffling" about.

  • 378. 0 0
    #323 Wrong
    • Jeff Ward
    • 09.05.07
    • 07:05

    The brief mention of Jesus in Josephus's works were added by Christian writers later on. Even honest Christian scholars admit this. There is no historical mention of Jesus outside of the Christian Bible.

  • 377. 0 0
    Kath
    • Danite
    • 09.05.07
    • 06:53

    You are welcome I guess.

  • 376. 0 0
    Canaanite
    • Danite
    • 09.05.07
    • 06:49

    But how are we to now what non Jews thought of jews except by reading the non Jewish sources? Are we supposed to read the Jewish sources? Surely Heroditus is as reliable as any other Hellenistic of greek source.Why all the doubts about this one? because he is not providing justifications for anti semitsm which is what are looking for in the ancient sources?

  • 375. 0 0
    Kath
    • Danite
    • 09.05.07
    • 06:45

    The authors name is William Dever.Enjoy!

  • 374. 0 0
    Latin lesson
    • Franco
    • 09.05.07
    • 06:43

    #28 LinkMan, "Anno Domini" means "Year of the Lord". Period. In no way "Anno Domini" could ever mean "Year of OUR Lord". I'am Jewish too, and Jesus is not my Lord, but this system of date is conventionally accepted all over the world, included Israel where it is flanked in official documents by the Jewish calendar date.

  • 373. 0 0
    Sara, Herod was more a king for the Jews than...
    • Jake
    • 09.05.07
    • 06:09

    Saddam, Assad, Nasser, and even the Hashemites were leaders for the Arabs. Herod built the greatest Temple in history. He put Judaea on the map. He increased the territory of Judaea threefold. He made it into an agricultural powerhouse. He built fortresses to defend the country against foreign invaders, including Arabs, whom he defeated. He earned Jews rights and privileges all over the Roman Empire. He was a bloody paranoid tyrant he massacred the legitimate Jewish dynasty, yes. But what did these Arab leaders do for their people? They drove them backwards centuries. They lost territory. They lost influence abroad. And on top of that, they all represent small minority groups with tiny power base. And to think Herod lived more than 2000 years ago!

  • 372. 0 0
  • 371. 0 0
    Efox , alas we can expect a mosque at Herodium
    • Jake
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:58

    They made Alexander the Great into a prophet of Islam(following the Jewish legend that Alexander paid his respects at the Temple). They call him al Nabi Iskandar. Do you think it's a problem to co-opt Herod as well?

  • 370. 0 0
    353Sara Show me Any reference to Philistines, 300BC-700AD
    • Michigan
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:56

    One single historically acceptable reference for 1000 year period...

  • 369. 0 0
    Maria
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:54

    "St.Peter was the apostle to the jewish people" where are you getting these things? Jesus came for everyone, he ended the devision between jew and gentile and started a new covenant, Jesus was to be the rock where his Church was to rest, for all mankind...you really are crazy Maria, but you do make me smile. :) He was to be the first pope, the first head of the Church, the ROCK. :) And no Maria, I am not Christian...or am I? :) hee

  • 368. 0 0
    Harold, RE "Almah"
    • Jake
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:41

    Almah does not mean virgin, but also it cannot be a married woman. It means 'maiden', or 'young, unmarried woman'.

  • 367. 0 0
    Virginia
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:36

    Islam's goal is to have the world realize god and submit to got, Muslim, he who submits to god, give up the material world that the west wallows in (US, Europe, etc) give up lust, all your money and focus just on god, submit to god. That is who rules the world in Islam, god. Modern day capitalism could never flourish alongside Islam, only a people who don't believe in god and flourish in such a materialist, hedonisitic world.

  • 366. 0 0
    one of herod's descendants....
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:35

    ishmail haniya told washington post a few years ago,"palestinians have israelis on the run now because they have found their weak spot:jews love life more than other people, and they prefer not to die. so suicide bombers are ideal for dealing with them."

  • 365. 0 0
    maria - Again Maria
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:33

    The Koran, according to Muslims, is god himself speaking through the Angel Gabriel, the messenger of god, "we" is god and his angels, david, gabriel, etc.

  • 364. 0 0
    herods tomb
    • james
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:32

    what does it matter, messiah has come and from the looks of things will be back shortly. jesus is salvation, first for the jew then the gentile.

  • 363. 0 0
    Akram Zekaria
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:31

    We could go down the list in the Torah about what it is wrong about. From evolution, to the idea that god is a man in the sky that dictates to man how to live, or that the seas were parted, or that Jesus was a virgin birth, if we can believe that then why not believe that Ganesh was born from Shiva? I mean a billion people believe this right? The Bhagavad Gita is way older than the torah and sanskrit is by far the one of, if not THE, oldest language on earth...so is the book right? What about the Koran? OH I see, "holy books" reflect more the issues of the time, of a primitive time, to use those books to guide modern life leads to people flying planes into building, or fighting over a piece of realstate despite the misery it causes people, or the extermination of a people because god dictates it so (here I am talking of the many holocausts written about in the torah, sucha s the people of Israel being ordered to execute everyone, and ofcourse the nazis, who's vision of the future...)

  • 362. 0 0
    Malka - Come on
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:25

    Despite the fact of when people started using BCE or CE it is not coincidence that they date that common era starts is when Jesus was born. Yes, jews have their own calendar but no one outside of Israel cares for it...the hindus, chinese and muslims have their own, but the numberical number that we all use is the one based on Christ and implemented by the Church. To deny it is silly, its like me coming to live in Israel and saying the year is not 5767 or that that year has nothing to do with Judaism...silly really, the whole world follows the western Calendar, and that Calendar was created by the Catholic Church, which is part of western civilization. PEACE

  • 361. 0 0
    #303 Kath, Hi, how did I get in your 303? Response from who?
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 05:16

    scared cow? I'm lost. I do know that the posts have been coming in a little off tonight, like not in sequence. Did I miss something?

  • 360. 0 0
    # 321 Just as Yeshua/Jesus was King FROM the Jews
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:58

    not "over" the Jews. It reminds me of Clinton's, "It all depends on what the meaning of "is" is. But hey, sometimes the meaning of those little words matter. Haaretz thanks for posting my reply to Paula, now how 'bout my reply to Akram. Thanks. I appreciate you guys/girls. :)

  • 359. 0 0
    Another fantastic theory about the name "Palestine" (Jake #299 re
    • Canaanite
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:39

    Jake works very hard to ridicule the Palestinians by claiming that their name is derived from HEBREW. 1. Jake`s Old Ridiculous Theory: The name Palestine is derived the Philistines (correct), but the Philistines, or Plishtim in Hebrew, got their name from the word "Polesh" (invader, in Hebrew). Problem was that Polesh does not appear in the Bible, and in any case the name of the Plishtim appears in Egyptian reliefs (Ramesses III) in the 12th century, and derived from the Philistines` own language. Too bad. 2. Jake`s New Ridiculous Theory: The name Palestine (Herodotus) which gave the Palestinians their name is derived from Greek `Palaistos`, meaning `wrestler`, and is a translation from `Israel` who wrestled with the angel (biblical story). Did you know that the Jews were known as Yehudim, and not as Israel in the time of Herodotus? Did you know that Herodotus did not visit Yehud (Judea) but passed along the shore in a ship and received mixed up information? Did you know that that Herodotus` visit preceded the arrival of the Greeks in the area (Alexander the Great) by some 100 years and they knew next to nothing about the Jews? How about stopping the stupid fairytales?

  • 358. 0 0
    lakshmi...that's the sign that God's children ...
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:12

    are the jewish people/and true christians as well.when they misbehave He chastises them.He doesn't bother those who are not His own.I'm sure your mother or father won't spank your neighbor's children.

  • 357. 0 0
  • 356. 0 0
    # 322 Tosefta. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
    • Kath'
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:07

    Tosefta Again I thank you and appreciate the "Information".I am a bit disappointed with today's discussions on the subject which is quite an important find,but not as important as the the "stele" which was offered by the two Jewish Philatropists.Who who are letting the Jerusalem Museum display it till June.It should stay in Israel.After all it was found in Israel.That is why I made a point of presenting a two part episode of it.Now,that is even more important to me,because it is a "find"you can read and is a tangible one representing the struggles of the, Maccabees and their Victory against the Greeks. I am off now.I always enjoy your posts even when I am not in total agreement with some of you views.So, please do not take offence when I act disproportianetly.Gosh,I feel tired and I make so many TYPO errors.Excuses are in order. dana is getting jealous for taking more notice of you.Why should I not!Difference of opinions notwithstanding.I do like you honestly.bye

  • 355. 0 0
    89# Amos. There is something more perfect than human knowledge.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:05

    "Come on .. EVOLVE the world 5000 years Old ?!. Amos. What is a YEAR Amos?Isn't Man's invention? Isn't that what you mean when you said 'a year'? What is a Light Year Amos ? Isn't an invention of science which means 186.000 earthly Kilo Mt.of earthly light speed/earthly second x 360 earthly days x 24 eartly hours x 60 earthly seconds.. What that tells us if we are talking about the creation itself ? Nothing. All these names,fgures,numbers,sums etc.. are tools of science. Science is always relative to erath, our earth. Go to any other planet and all these figures and sums etc.. means nothing. In another word our knowledge, relative to the creation itself is Zero. The 5000 years you mentioned relative to the creation is something that we don't know nothing about ? All we know, that you are wrong and the 5000 could be right.

  • 354. 0 0
    God's everlasting covenant with the rebirth....
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:05

    of israel,are like an anvil against the koran. the rebirth of israel is proof that the koran and mohammed are incorrect. for this reason, there will always be tension between israel and islam.for islam to recognize the nation of israel this would be an admission that the koran and islam are wrong.when the islamic nations come against israel and jerusalem, God will judge them. this destruction will lead them to realize the bible is the Word of God,and the holy God of Israel is the true God.

  • 353. 0 0
    JAKE,where did the dispersed by N. Philistines go?
    • sara
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:01

    Regardless of linguistic references there are actual archeological sites in Palestine which have been indentified as Philistine(both sites and iron sites).So far 30 to 40 and about a 100 of the latter.It is known that the Philistines brought iron to the region. Just as the jews did not disperse in their entirety from the region after the defeat in the 2nd century A.D. by the Romans,so the Philistines were around and were part of the conversion to Islam.

  • 352. 0 0
    Jews have used CE, BCE since the 1800s
    • Malka
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:01

    Jews started using CE (Common Era) and BCE (Before the Common Era) in the mid-1800s: CE replaced AD (Anno Domini, "Year of Our Lord" in Latin), BCE replaced BC (Before Christ). No offense to our Christian friends, but we have a difference of opinion on the meaning of "Domini". Our great grandfathers were not trying to be "politically correct" 150 years ago. By the way, we have our own Jewish calendar and the current year is 5767. Here's an interesting article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_calendar

  • 351. 0 0
    ballestic # 300 hmmmmmmmmmm, a little bit of "street language"
    • terrornator
    • 09.05.07
    • 04:00

    there young lady,hope you didn't pick that up from me,lol.

  • 350. 0 0
    #323 Well, golly day, if it isn't the second member
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:54

    of the naysaying triumvirate who now posts a like minded naysayer instructing her not to post me. Say Kath, I can believe you could even fix your mouth to call somebody "hateful", that takes moxie. What you hate is the fact that folks are pointing out your desire to slurp up all ME land on behalf of Israel (remember your stated desire for Jordan). Take a look in the mirror and behold hate. I stand for justice, no matter the recipient. You stand for apartheid and left South Africa when it fell apart and plopped down in Pal land attempting to convince everybody you have a claim and that an entire people do not exist. When you posted Israel deserves Jordan, it unmasked the ugliness in you. I hope posters take note of the hateful posts you send to fellow Jews who do not agree with you. You chide Connie like a mentally challenged child, don't talk to this one or that. Based on your Jordan post, it became apparent to me that you are a few skivvies short of a full gym bag! Stop lying!

  • 349. 0 0
    King Herod
    • Prudence
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:52

    CE=Common Era;BCE= Before Common Era. There was NO Cairo before about 800 CE-it was founded as a fort about 150 years after Mohammed died-as An Cairan. So Joe of Rammalah-therefore Ben Ezra synagogue you mention is incorrect. Besides Jewish synogogues only started around 100 BCE . Older synogogues found in Galile-Tiberias & Golan & jericho from BCE. Joe of Rammallah your knowledge of history is deplorable, and your statements of history very funny but sad. Nabateans were an east semitic people who moved west-they created their own culture absorbing Greek and Roman-like their architecture; and were a rich trade international people. Edomites[Iduwean] West semites not Arabs: Arabs east semites. Aramaic a west north semite tongue from around Babylon/Assyria

  • 348. 0 0
    st. peter ....
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:42

    was the apostle to the jewish people,st. paul was the apostle to the gentiles.concerning Jesus......luke 24:14 and he[Jesus] unto them these are the words which I spake unto you,while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled,which were written in the 'law of moses',and in the 'prophets',and in the 'psalms' concerning me[Jesus]........Jesus was mentioned in the Old Testament as well.

  • 347. 0 0
    # 313 Thank you. I will continue to study Jewish history. I have
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:37

    already come to the conclusion that nothing is accidental. One thing we can all be certain of is that the one word we will never hear from our Creator is oops! Hallelu Yah! I really enjoyed your post and fully agree, open mindedness is crucial to growth. However it also must be used with extreme caution (prayer) as my mother used to always tell me, "Don't be so open-minded, your brains might fall out!" Regards back at ya friend.

  • 346. 0 0
    Kath I am suprised
    • danite
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:34

    I thought I was a mouth piece for the saboteur left??His name is William Dever.

  • 345. 0 0
    oh really amos...the muslims stated...2nd try.
    • maria
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:31

    they got their interpretation from the torah.if they got it from there..they really twisted the Word of God.muhammad was born in 570 AD.this is in their koran:surah 2:50 and remember we divided the sea for you and saved you.and drowned pharoah's people within you very sight....my question is ,who's "we".

  • 344. 0 0
    #310 Efox, or electronic fox tales?
    • Tosefta
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:24

    1. "[Herod's] son was recognized as Jewish he could not technically be King because his father was not recognized as Jewish." - Efox Herod's family was Edomite. They were converted to Judaism many years before Herod was born. The Talmud tells the story of King Agrippa, either Herod's grandson or great grandson, who was reading Deuteronomy in public during Sukkot and began crying when he read "be sure to appoint over you the king the LORD your God chooses. He must be from among your own brothers" (Deut. 17:15). The people said to him "Agrippa, you are our brother..) so he was recognized as King. (In any case, kings were appointed by the Romans, including Herod himself.) 2. "There is no Arab in him though it makes perfect sense that Arabs would be claiming as much" Actually, his mother was a Nabatean, a tribe from Arabia, who pushed the Edomites into Judea as they expanded northward.

  • 343. 0 0
    # 293 Not off topic entirely, political and religous
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:13

    go hand in hand with this type of science.

  • 342. 0 0
    # 309 Connie. I wish you you'd stop communicating ...
    • Kath'
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:11

    With that hypocritical woman who only comes here where ordered.You can bet your life,any time there is a controversial article she is summoned to appear,and she drops all the "chips" she is using for the games at Laz Vegas and with nothing to do and comes here to agravate us all.Israel and the Jews. I say,let her stew in her juice and do not bother with her kind.She is nothing but trouble,and the sooner she realizes that there are no Palis,the better for her ILK....

  • 341. 0 0
    Book (Kathy #295)
    • Tosefta
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:08

    I assume you are looking for a book by William Dever (Changed his name to Dvir in Hebrew but writes under Dever). He has a book: "Who were the early Israelites and where did they come from", which may be what you are looking for. Very nice book.

  • 340. 0 0
    Moury
    • Harry D
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:08

    "He granted it to his loyal Pastafarian followers, who will one day, return to their PROMISED LAND, and rejoice in our spaghetti wonderland we will create for ourselves". Unfortunately strife will invariably ensue between the Zittites, the Shellites, the Fetuccinites, the Macaronnites, the Gnoccites, etc over who are true spiritual heirs to the Great Spaghetti Monster, until Angel Hair himself comes to redeem them.

  • 339. 0 0
    310Efox Herod's grandson, Aggripas, was King of Judea
    • Michigan
    • 09.05.07
    • 03:00

    And recognized as such by Jews (and Romans). Thus "though his son was recognized as Jewish he could not technically be King because his father was not recognized as Jewish." does not make sense.

  • 338. 0 0
    310EFOX, Herod was not king For the Jews but King
    • sara
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:58

    OVER the Jews.The Romans placed him there.His father was Antipater and Idumaen and his mother Arab.Marc Antony and the Roman made him King of Judaea His entire long reign testifies to his being a Roman vassal.Everything was done for the Romans. King of the Jews is therefore a misnomer.

  • 337. 0 0
    #307 Well, golly day, if it isn't one of the
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:58

    triumvirate of naysaying apologists joining Kath and Lynn. What happened, did you run out of right minded posters to gnaw on? You confuse justice with hate and I am sure on your part that is intentional. You apparently hate the fact that me and other posters, including some of your brethren, are pointing out you and yours attempt to steal an entire country based on BS while slowly genociding its people. I have no idea why you bothered to post me since you know I am not a consumer of your principal product, which is BS. Well, sorry to say for you, it is not business as usual, new day, new reality. You asked about a bouncer job at the MGM and I put your name in. I am told you must be short, weigh at least 200 lbs, and possess a hateful disposition so I took the liberty of submitting your name based on your inquiries. Cheer up, there will be new posters to whom you can sell BS, however, it will be short lived. Have tea. Regards.

  • 336. 0 0
    230# Virgina. Faith is the engine of truth.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:50

    "Always add the word of God, our creator will". Virgina. I liked what you said here, above all I love the way you used the word 'will'.It reflect that G-d is the power behind action;and not a myth or a tablet of commandments.It is amazing how wrong Man seeks the truth !When the truth is under his nose.And that is not only in the natural world, but also in History.All you need to search with an opend mind. Faith is not blindness.Faith,is the'Result' of searching with an opend mind. Isn't that the same as the 'the scientific mathod' ? Study Jewish History with an open mind; with the purpose to search for the dialectics leading to the purpose of events; and you will come to the conclusion that nothing is accidental. Everything made to a certain purpose and conclusions. Just like in the Natural World. This how you plant the seed of Faith in you. Faith is NOT for the Common man. That is where all religions have failed. Faith is the engine of truth. Regards.

  • 335. 0 0
    #300 LIAR
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:48

    Golly day, Kath, why are you feeding this poor woman BS, which is what it is. No matter how much you wish for the Pals to disappear, they remain there, prominent like an unwanted wart on a woman's nose. No matter how she attempts to get rid of it, it gets uglier and uglier! Get a grip, will you? Try being truthful like Dor, a poster above. Now there is somebody who deserves respect. He is concerned about you disappearing due to exigent circumstances and not the Pals. Be careful wishing ill on others. Have you resigned yourself that you won't be getting Jordan as part of Greater Israel, as you stated in one of your posts? It must be the water there. Regards.

  • 334. 0 0
    Defend History From Palestinianism
    • Efox
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:44

    You can't dig a hole in Israel without running in to some piece of buried history and no where in the world is there more historical significance packed in to less land, but the revisionists with a vested interest in obfuscating the past will be at work here. They recklessly tore apart the land beneath the Temple Mount, Vandalized the Tomb of the Patriarchs and they will lay claim to this piece of History as well. Don't let them build a Mosque on this Dastard's Tomb. There is nothing holy about it, but History must be protected.

  • 333. 0 0
    Herod was Half Greek Half Jewish
    • Efox
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:39

    His conversion to Judaism was never fully recognized because he spent so much time wallowing in decadence and dining on fish that were considered unclean, though his son was recognized as Jewish he could not technically be King because his father was not recognized as Jewish. There is no Arab in him though it makes perfect sense that Arabs would be claiming as much in an effort to ban infidels from another historical site. The people from which his Mother Descended, have since been annihilated and almost completely replaced by Arabians, along with the original inhabitants of Southern Iraq, Byzantium and Assyria.

  • 332. 0 0
    Instead of you're welcome, let me just say...To God be the Glory!
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:28

    Hi Paula, Thank you. Or should I say, Thank God for you. "I truly love their God with all my heart" Their God will be my God and their people, my people too. I always Love to hear people who are able to unashamedly and without fear, express their Love for the Holy One of Israel. Bless you.

  • 331. 0 0
    Ultimate proof Herods was Jewish
    • Comforti
    • 09.05.07
    • 02:03

    "His mother's chariot flipped over near Herodium, and Herod became hysterical until he realized she was only lightly wounded."

  • 330. 0 0
    Read Jeff @ 296 Great answer!! And the simile perfect!
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:56

    "order, reorder, disorder" every parent should know this one! And this can most certainly be applied to God's Word as well.

  • 329. 0 0
    Ballistic
    • Connie
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:55

    Having stood before the Western Wall countless times I can honestly say it is a most moving experience. Doubtful you would understand....must be something about the heat in Henderson. You know that ugly golden pimple that stands atop the Temple Mount...guess why its there? In case you are ignorant of these facts it is there because the arabs wanted to erase all proof of the Holy Temple and Jewish identity in the area. They behave like this...just look what they recently did to Josephs Tomb. No respect for anyone else...but of course you could never see this because you have arab propaganda glasses on...better to see with...but unfortunately you get a distorted view of things..I'm curious..don't you have better things to do in nearby Las Vegas than spending your time spewing hatred on an Israeli forum?I hear the MGM needs a bouncer.

  • 328. 0 0
    Thank you Virginia
    • Paula
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:46

    Do the followers of Allah actually know of his history? He was the moon god! Do you think Abraham would worship false idols? I know not! He worshipped the great I AM...the spirit of the true God and creator of all living things. He passed his lineage to his son with his first wife Sarah named Issac. Issac was named by He that is all holy to father his people. So in response that the Jews were not the people that Moses led into Canaan is bunk. They were called Israelites...hello? Israel! I truly love their God with all my heart, mind and soul...I was friends with a Rabbi growing up and respected him...only difference is I love with all my heart their Messiah that for most Jews missed even though the all the signs were right before them in the Torah. Finally, I trust a God who loves all of us and wants to be good to each other as we would ourselves and calls us to Him through His Son's sacrifice for our sakes. He doesnt need us to perpretrate hate and violence.

  • 327. 0 0
    # 289 and as far as the Earth being older than 5000 years or
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:42

    why the Bible or any other scripture omits dinosaurs??? And then there are these findings. God is received by faith. No one has all the answers. Those who know God, don't need all the answers. Evolve? We must. No one could receive it all at once, we grow in His likeness through His Word. If you'd like to evolve, read it.

  • 326. 0 0
    Jason Sourpuss
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:41

    Was this guy a relative of yours?????

  • 325. 0 0
    239Hal There is not a single trace of Israelites in Palestine???
    • Michigan
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:40

    Museums in Paris, London, New York are full of Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Moabite, Judean Stella?s and records, written in stone, and thousands of coins, seals, and more, making your claim ridiculous. Unless you limit your term "Palestine" to the narrow strip of coast, between Jaffa and Gaza, where the Philistines really lived from 1200 to 600 BC.

  • 324. 0 0
    294 BALLISTIC, greetings! I feel that way too.
    • lakshmi
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:38

    "There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible,but in the end they fall,remember that always . . ." Mahatma Gandhi Yes, the Palestinians will overcome,not someday,but SOON !

  • 323. 0 0
    #223 Response
    • Mike
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:34

    I'm glad you mentioned Josephus because he also confirms (as other non-Biblical writers do) the historical fact of Jesus, James and John The Baptist. I cannot let you get away with saying the Bible is historically inaccurate without you supplying an example. Please supply one!

  • 322. 0 0
    # 291 Pam. dear girl what are you waffling about???
    • Kath'
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:30

    Pam Get a hold of yourself,and stop confusing the issue.There are no such people called Palestinians.Yes there were,and the REAL PALESTINIANS DURING THE RE-BIRTH OF ISRAEL AND THE BRITISH MANDATE "THE JEWS WERE CALLED PALESTINIANS"AND THE REST(NOT MANY AT THE TIME)WERE MERELY CALLED "A R A B S".SIMPLE AS:A B C.

  • 321. 0 0
    # 289 Amos - Yes, I have read. The biggest difference is that
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:29

    the Koran teaches rulership of Muslims, while the Torah and the Gospels teach the rulership of God... Alone. God is Ruler and King. Man was NEVER meant to rule over man the way men interpret that they are. Should God set us to rule over men as He will many, it will be as a parent rules over their child. To guide, teach and bless. Not force, dictate and oppress.

  • 320. 0 0
    re: Yeshua is the Messiah, but not a God
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 01:13

    Jesus (Yeshua), was not the biological son of Joseph. Every piece of evidence we have on the subject shows that Joseph accepted Jesus even though he was NOT his biological father. Joseph was chosen to be the earthly father of Jesus because of who he was as a person, and becuase of his lineage from David. If you study ancient Jewish ideas you would plainly see that his lineage could only be traced through Joseph, because the lineage of women wasn't seen as significant. Their children were never traced through them, so Jesus wouldn't have been either. Jesus did come through the line of David, but only through his "adopted" father. Jesus was fortunate to have 2 very significant ancestors.

  • 319. 0 0
    re: Why all the hate
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:58

    As Christians, we aren't trying to force the world into believing in Christ by using the terms BC and AD. It is the rest of the world who is finding anything and everything they can to use against Christians. If we had a calendar that used terms such as BM (before Muhammed) or BB (before Buddha) I wouldn't have a problem with it (and this wouldn't even be a topic of conversation on this board or any other). That would only mean that people of that religion implemented the current calendar. Trying to change the terms is just another way to suppress Chrisitianity. Afterall, they aren't trying to change the year.

  • 318. 0 0
    Those who come to see the error of the Koran need not feel alone.
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:57

    Christians were deceived to believe the laws of God were superseded. The eyes of the Jews were closed and unable to see God in Messiah. God Loved us while we were in sin. God Loves us even though we've been deceived. He saw the last days from the begining and still He came. And even still He Loves us and wants us to turn from our ways to His. We can all thank God that there is still time. How much? Only the Father knows. He wanted us to know, He wants none to perish. Look to Him.

  • 317. 0 0
    David Teich
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:52

    Christians slaughtered Jews? Yes, wars were waged against Jews in the name of Christianity. However, Christians were first persecuted BY people of the Jewish faith. Yes, slughtered by them. They were stoned to death, pushed from temple walls, beheaded, any number of atrocities. In fact, they are still being persecuted by the millions today. Let's also not forget that when Jews come under fire now, it is Christian nations that come to your aid.

  • 316. 0 0
    Matt: BCE, CE and the calendar
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:47

    Great response! I agree wholeheartedly!

  • 315. 0 0
    Sara, not certain that Palestine refers directly to Philistines
    • Jake
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:44

    The Philistines (Greek 'Filistaioi') ceased to exist as a recognizable ethnic group around 600bc, when they were dispersed by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. The word Palestine (Greek Palaistine) was coined by Herodotus in around 430 b.c., who wrote about the 'Palestine-Syrians' as being a circumcized people who learned the custom from the Egyptians (which the Philistines were famous for NOT being). Palaistine is etymologically derived from the Greek word 'PALAISTES', wrestler (the -ine is a Greek genetive ending). The name Israel in Hebrew means 'one who wrestled with God', in reference to Jacob's wrestling with a mysterious anthropomorphic being. There is a theory that the Greek name 'Palaistine' is just a translation of 'Israel' with only indirect reference to the once-present Philistines that lived on the coast.

  • 314. 0 0
    284KATH, since your Lord God or whoever you swear by has
    • lakshmi
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:40

    assured you of Israel's destiny what's your problem? Why are you jumping up and down ? Or is it that you know that your Lord God punished you several times for unjust and immoral behaviour towards your fellow beings ? Remember you went into exile at least twice,and if you don't live at peace with your neighbours,maybe you are in deep trouble once again.

  • 313. 0 0
    European Political Ziontists...
    • Maureen Ann
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:38

    are the 'Romans' in Israel today!

  • 312. 0 0
    Akram
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:35

    Akram, very well said. I can follow what you were saying. I think someone misinterpreted it. I agree with you though. Jews have been persecuted throughout history, and it does seem peculiar that the downfalls of the governments who perpetrated those acts followed soon thereafter.

  • 311. 0 0
    no name # 275 BCE & CE
    • Jeff Northridge
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:32

    Howdy No Name; While I wasn't looking, some academics decided to change BC (before Christ) to BCE (before the common era or perhaps before the Christian era) and AD (ante domini = in the year of our Lord) to CE (common era or perhaps Christian era). I don't know why they did this, but I always use BC and AD because that is what I was taught in school and all references prior to the 1970's use BC and AD and not BCE and CE. I mean why screw up the Gregorian calender if you don't have to? Some academics go overboard in their attempts to be "politically correct" whereas they only wind up confusing everybody. Like the military says, "order, counter order, disorder".

  • 310. 0 0
    # 240 Danite. I WENT AND LOOKED.,,......
    • Kath'
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:32

    Danite I tried the said gentleman only found one Dever,who is a minister of some church or other. No mention of the subject in question,no reference at all. Please tell me Danite,what is his first name? Then we may get somewhere. Greetings and Thanks

  • 309. 0 0
    #263 Lakshmi
    • ballistic
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:29

    Lotsa times things don't go as planned. If ever there was evidence of plans awry, look recently at Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan. Man plans, but God plans too. At the present time, it appears as though man's plans and God's plans are not in agreement. Only time will tell whose plans are THE PLANS. The Pals are a strong people with a strong cause. No matter what naysayers say, I would not count them out, no way, no how. Justice always wins out without any input from those who seek to deprive others of it. Regards. Ballistic.

  • 308. 0 0
    # 285 The power of the Word of God is so far beyond
    • Virginia
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:27

    our comprehension. We must learn to invoke this power. It changes the hearts of man!!! The first step I have learned is... One must begin with their own heart.

  • 307. 0 0
    Herod's Tomb
    • Lorraine
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:27

    To Toronto's Finest...I have to agree it is fantastic news. Now we need more discoveries there to tell us for sure. I'm hoping that will come soon. The rest of the posters here are off the subject entirely. This is not political or religous, it's science = anthropology/archeology.

  • 306. 0 0
    Harry D
    • Pam
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:24

    When I was referring to archaelogical & written history, I wasn't referring to only Herod's tomb. If I were, I would agree that the statement wasn't accurate. The records indicate that the land Israel was built on was BOUGHT by Hebrews. I worded my statement poorly when I said they were the first ones there. What I meant by that, is that they were the first to inhabit Israel as a nation, and that it wasn't taken by force from Palestinians. By the way, I do believe that Native Americans and the Aboriginal people of Austrailia got a very raw deal. I DO NOT in any way agree with how their land was taken from them, no more than I agree with what the Palestinians have been trying to do for countless years.

  • 305. 0 0
    David Teich.#116 the Battle of the Trenches&how the Prophet PBUH
    • PETER SM
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:19

    expressed his pleasure at the beheadings,more pleasure than a new Camel. The other lesson of course is the meaning of Hudna to Arabs ever since. They must think the world is stupid.

  • 304. 0 0
    Virginia
    • Amos
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:19

    Come on Virginia! "The character of the God of the Koran and the character of the God of the Bible are two different characters." Have you read the Koran? In fact the god of Koran is more alligned with the Torah, the old testament, than the god of the Christians, the New testament god and the old testament god are very, very, different. The Koran praises "the people of the book" but it says that they are wrong, much as the Christians believe...you would think that they Koran would warn against the people who follow jesus, if they followed the people of the book, they would STILL not belive in Jesus. On a side note, the god of the Torah, or the conception of god is a very primitive view of life and the world where there is thinking being that gets involved in world affairs (akin to pagan conception of old)...it was appropriate for people thousands of years ago...but today? Come on...EVOLVE the world 5,000 years old?! Well we already know THAT is FALSE.

  • 303. 0 0
    # 279 Virginia. and Haaretz.Tell me Haaretz...
    • Kath'
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:09

    IS THIS LAKSHMI A SACRED COW,THAT YOU DIDN'T PUT OUT MY RESPONSE TO HER A FEW MINUTES AGO? A SPECIALL PERSON,AN UNTOUCHABLE????? IF I SEE A RESPONSE FROM YOU,THEN I SHALL DECIDE THAT YOU HAVE AN AGENDA HERE FOR SOME AND AGAINST OTHERS..................

  • 302. 0 0
    LAKSHMI #225.Hamas is talking greater Palestine as does Fateh
    • PETER SM
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:08

    In case you have not noticed Israel has left Gaza,Sinai etc. While your brothers are talking greater Palestine you can all whistle. India and Israel have got a good relationship does that suit the greater Palestine plans? The Islamic republic from the river to the sea ethnically cleansed of Jews? YOU complain about haters. Look at what your brothers have on their OFFICIAL media.

  • 301. 0 0
    Joe@90
    • Leila
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:07

    Half Arab? Then why did Herod build a Jewish temple? Joe, you're insulting the guy after he put all that time and effort in building such a magnificent building and believe me, Arabs ( if any ) were running around in the dunes of Arabia, way-way- South.

  • 300. 0 0
    Response to #28 re BCE/CE vs BC/AD
    • bpp
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:07

    Always amazes me how much non-Christians know about Christianity. I would guess that many Christians did not even know what AD means, however I'm sure they do appreciate the new light you shed on old Latin meaning. Anyhow I can appreciate and understand your explanation that as a non-Christian you're offended by being subjected to any lordship that you do not subscribe to. I'd probably be offended by my years named under anyone other than Jesus' Lordship from my viewpoint, so I sincerely do get it from your viewpoint. Net result for me is that the neutral "Common Era" timestamp I can live with in this world, so as not to offend non-Christian sensitivities, as long as I have the freedom to believe that I enter the "eternal now" under Jesus' Lordship.

  • 299. 0 0
    # 249 B.Sarah. AN ADDENDUM...
    • Kath'
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:05

    FORGOT TO MENTION WHAT OUR QUESTIONS SHOULD BE TO THESE IGNORANTS,AND IT IS THIS:IF THEY PURSUE WITH THIS A FEW QUESTIONS ARE IN ORDER. WHO WAS THEIR KING? WHAT WAS THEIR CURRENCY? I WAS GOING TO ADD A FEW MORE THINGS.BUT!I KNOW THEY WOULD TWIST IT TO THEIR WAY AND CHANGE IT. SO,I REFRAINED FROM DOING SO. ANY

  • 298. 0 0
    lakshmi
    • Joe
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:03

    I don't hate Palestinians. I myself am a Sephardic Jew, of quite mixed blood, in fact I myself have some Greek, Bulgarian, and Palestinian Arab blood. I don't hate any human being at all and do see fault with some of Israel's policies. This being said, I do hate people who blow themselves up or send missiles to civilian areas. I particularly despise a parent who would send their child to blow themselves up... And I don't believe that any goal, independence, or whatever, justfies killing. Not to mention that Hamas's goal is to kill every Jew, both in Israel, and outside of Israel (according to their own charter), so for me what you call "hating" is simple self-preservation. In my opinion, it would be suicidal for Israel to withdraw from the territories in the current situation. Hamas would see that as a victory, no doubt, and continue with their war towards the destruction of Israel and the physical elimination of Jews from the earth...So unfortunately, I don't see a solution currently.

  • 297. 0 0
    Albert Seligman
    • The Spotlight
    • 09.05.07
    • 00:02

    The Spolight is here to shine a light on dark corners and the things that hide in them.

  • 296. 0 0
    amos...I rest my case...
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:59

    2 corinthians 4:4 in whom the god of this world[satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, let the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.........allah is not god.history proves that before islam came into existence...the sabeans in arabia worshipped the moon god...who married the sun goddess, who gave birth to three goddesses.allah was just one of 360 idols in the kabah in mecca.the crescent moon is everywhere in islam.

  • 295. 0 0
    Herod
    • R.T.S.
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:58

    Every new bit of info. and discovery related in any way to religion ignites the age old rivalry of religions.To be as passionate about assuming responsibility and genuine caring for this World and Peoples would accomplish much more Good than killing and destroying in the name of religion.Any religion.

  • 294. 0 0
    Land ownership
    • S
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:58

    And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. God may have given us dominion over the earth. But he is the owner. We are just subjects in his kingdom. This is God's vinyard, we are just tending it for him. We are all living on his time and his land. Be wise and give him all the praise for what you have.

  • 293. 0 0
    Amos hello
    • Danite
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:57

    Even if the majority came from outside Cannan, they came from the region anyhow and became as native to the land they inhabited for thousands of years as much as the Franks became the French and the Angles the English and Arabs from the hejaz became Palestinians.Enjoy!

  • 292. 0 0
    # 249 Bruiriah Sarah. FUNNILY ENOUGH JOSEPHUS...
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:57

    B.Sarah Josephus even hardly mentions Jesus,ans I have in my possession a very old and and authentic book on the history of the Jewish Wars by Josephus,and there is only one line about Jesus that was probably inserted by the publishers without a doubt.Since I haven't rad many posts I don't know who made this stupid assertion.but surprised?Not at all.Delusional as always.They also on another forum(where you there?)when they said the same about Jesus being a Pal. So ridiculous as we all know no such people existed except when the Romans decided to undermine the Jews and changed the name,from Judea and Samaria and called it Syria-Palestina. I think the know,but still like to antagonize us here,deriving a perverted pleasure from it. Nice to see you here and keep it up please. Best of luck

  • 291. 0 0
    Hal Spears # 239 That's a Bunch of Bull!
    • Jeff Northridge
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:55

    Howdy Hal; The Hebrews started migrating from Ur, Sumer, Mesopotamia prior to 2200 BC to the Levant and to Egypt, but nobody knows why. This was before Judaism became their established religion with the advent of Abraham's "enlightenment" and subsequent commitment to monotheism. The Holy Land was populated rather sparsely by the Canaanites who were essentially southern Phoenicians and who had little if any relationship with the Arabs to the their east. The word "Palaestina" was invented by the Romans during the reign of the Emperor Hadrian in 135 AD and comes from the word "Philistine" or "Philistia" who were sea peoples of Greek origin, who inhabited the coastal areas of the Holy Land, and who had nothing whatsoever to do with the Arabs. What? Moses didn't cross the Sinai? Are you trying to tell me that Cecil B. de Mille was wrong? Awe, that's a shame. I liked that story especially when pharoah's army gets zapped by God in the Red Sea.

  • 290. 0 0
    In other words Harold... Give credit to no other,
    • Virginia
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:52

    look for no other, YHWH Himself has redeemed those He will call to faith in His Word.

  • 289. 0 0
    275 BCE & CE -Actually its the PC way of saying BC & AD
    • Mack
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:47

    BC = Before Christ AD = Latin for (Catholic Church) "The Year of our Lord" Hence, our year (2007) corresponds with the birth of Christ. I have no problems going to Israel and saying its 5000+ according to "creation" nor would i demand anyone change it...even though we all know the planet and humanity is WAY older than 5,000 years old.

  • 288. 0 0
    239 \HAL SPEARS, agree with you about the Philistines
    • sara
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:42

    See my post 229,where I look into the question of the Philistines being in the region since the Iron Age.There are 30+ Philistine sites in Palestine.And at least 50+ iron sites(they introduced iron into the region).And ofcourse,we know from the Old T. that the Israelites battled with the Philistines.

  • 287. 0 0
    Response to #271
    • Paula
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:42

    God bless you my Aussie friend! Well put!!

  • 286. 0 0
    Jesus Proven
    • anyonmous
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:40

    Thank you Lord and Messiah of Israel, they have proven the New Testament true and Herod was after you!

  • 285. 0 0
    274 - G-d spoke to all Jews when giving out the Torah
    • Bruriah Sarah
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:40

    If you read the Torah, in Exodus, G-d speaks to the Jewish people and announces the first commandment. Because of the power of G-d's words, people fainted and had to be revived by angels.

  • 284. 0 0
    # 263 lakshmi. What seems to be the trouble dear??
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:37

    Is it because he is telling the truth?or is it that you still hope the palis will still be here and he does not think so?Well deah,I have a jolly good feeling they ain't going to achieve much and will stagnate and disappear in due time.Failing this scenario,they already have a country where their brethren awaits them.And that country is Jordan. Israel is GOD'S COPUNTRY THE COUNTRY OF THE JEWS GOD'S OWN.

  • 283. 0 0
    Koran-"the word DIRECT from God...Not my God. And
    • Virginia
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:33

    certainly not the God of Abraham. Not the Creator. No doubt the word was direct, but from whom? The heart of the Prophet? Whose Prophet? Too contrary to be my God's Prophet, even only through the Book of Genesis. The character of the God of the Koran and the character of the God of the Bible are two different characters. It is no wonder the Koran warns its believers against "the people of the book" (These people could possibly lead them to the truth of the never changing God of Abraham-who Loves ALL He has made)

  • 282. 0 0
    # 276 no name.re:BCE/CE I too sometime ago...
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:30

    hello no name As I said above,I too was nonplused about this.Now I know better.BCE=Before the Currant Era,and CE is:Currant Era...presumably??? I hope I am not giving you wrong Info' Anyway,of course it is good news for the archeologist who work so hard and for years and years before they can uncover whatever has happened in the past thousands centuries,etc. I would have loved to become one,but never did. However,I substitute it by reading history. You sound sweet,I think you are a nice person,unless I am mistaken?(hope not) Nice to see You..

  • 281. 0 0
    to Ernst #134....You really make no sense
    • SLAVO
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:26

    Your hatred for Jews and this Jewish state is retarding you. But check this out. Herod the Jew and his decendants were as you say occupiers. Yet they were here way before the present day Arabs. Doesnt that mean that the present day Arabs are the modern day occupiers? If they werent here before Herod, then they are occupiers, right? Then they must go.

  • 280. 0 0
    Ellen Reid - WHAAAT??!!!
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:20

    I could have sworn that Jesus was Hindu! This is quite the revelation Ellen, have you confirmed this with the Vatican? Boy! Did we think the the Da Vinci Code was going to cause a ruckos! Now this! :)

  • 279. 0 0
  • 278. 0 0
    Harold,Harold,Harold... Simple reasoning clarifies
    • Virginia
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:17

    that no man, no matter what his title could possibly save us from the Word of God. Only God can save us from His Word, with His Word, there is none greater. Read with prayer. Had Yeshua/Jesus been just a man, He would not have had the wisdom He did to even make up the claims He made. God is not the man, God is Spirit, the Spirit within the man. If one cannot see this, they should at least strive to get to the place where they are willing to accept that God Himself will be the Judge of us all. Each will answer for their beliefs. Yeshua/Jesus came not to condemn but to save. Our best mirror of Him is to point others to the Father as He did.

  • 277. 0 0
    harold...I don't agree with you.
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:10

    let's start from genesis 1:1 in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.and now let me take you to john 1:1 in the beginning was the Word[Jesus],and the Word[Jesus] was with God.John 1:3 all things were made by him;and without him was not any thing made that was made.1 John 5:17 for there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word[Jesus],and the Holy Ghost[Holy Spirit]: and these three are one.........joseph was not the biological father of Jesus.Jesus has no sin in Him[He is 100% man;100% God]Mary was a virgin when she had Jesus[virgin-she knew not a man].in luke 1:34,35 then said Mary unto the angel....seeing I know not a man?35....the Holy Ghost[Holy Spirit] shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall "overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.there were gentiles in the line of the Messiah--Rahab and ruth[the moabite woman].

  • 276. 0 0
    # 248 Clickfool and # 245 Yael S. HURRAH !!........
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:10

    Clickfool I thought she was funny,then you come out with a reply and I am in stiches. Why don't you two get together and dance while twirling the "pastas" through your tresses...

  • 275. 0 0
    BCE/CE what does this mean?
    • no name
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:09

    What the devil does BCE and CE mean??? I have never heard of those terms. Which Herod are we talking about here? The one that had all the baby boys before 3yrs old killed? thanks...at any rate it is a great find no matter what anyone says...we should learn more from history...like no one wins in playing the game of war. Everyone loses especailly our young people not matter what race we are talking about.

  • 274. 0 0
    maria - Wrong (AGAIN!)
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:07

    "muhammad got his interpretation from torah,but he twisted God`s Word." Muslims believe that Mohammed received the Koran directly FROM god, NO interpretation there...the Koran is the only book that claims to be the DIRECT word of GOD. ,...and no, Maria, I know what you are thinking, I AM NOT MUSLIM... :) Jeez!

  • 273. 0 0
    # 250 Ellen..Nice to see an Iranian here.:Talkback
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:06

    Ellen Say no more,you have put the finger on the pulse.Let me remind you though,that the hate usually comes from Israel's detractors,and the Jews come out in defence of their country,which after all it is expected. This is a very liberal newspaper,we have many more like Haaretz in Israel who are neither afraid or restricted to publish anything they wish and let the "talkbackers"in without any fear.You see,this is what we call a true democracy.Enjoy...............

  • 272. 0 0
    Maria
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:04

    "romans....who had perpetual hatred toward the jews/israelites" The romans did not really care about the jews or the little outpost in the east, very little food or wealth was coming from their. Egypt and what is now Turkey was much more important to them as a lot of the grain and taxes came from their. The romans were really indifferent about the Jews, they were one of MANY tribes througout the empire, in fact, they were more concerned with Gaul than anything else.

  • 271. 0 0
    Jesus was a Jew
    • Ellen Reid
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:02

    This discovery of Herod's tomb is one more historical confirmation that the Bible is true. Many Jews and Christians do not seem to realise that Jesus was a Jew who also suffered under the Herods. Jesus' teachings were all derived from the Jewish Scriptures. He said that the greatest commandment was "Hear O Israel....". It is phenomenal that the dating scheme used today throughout most of the world is based on the life of a Jew who lived in the land of Israel. It may not be an accurate date, but give or take a few years it is still based on the birth of a Jew! Some of you may be interested in our website: www.biblenews.org

  • 270. 0 0
    Danite
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 23:00

    umm interesting...if that is true...then Jews really are native to the area and not just some people that came from somewhere outside in Africa. I like that! (I just placed in my basket in Amazon) Thanks! Amos S.

  • 269. 0 0
    # Joe...re#225 -that is funny!! Tell me Joe how ...
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:58

    Joe While I agree with your posts,I would like to know your secret in how you manage to get the responses out,without having to beg haaretz? I particularely approved the one you sent to Ramallah Joe.He writes well,but still clings to reading and getting misinformed by sticking to only certain authors like "Finkelstein"who is fraud-Jewish or not he is a bloody fool.Anytime you may encounter detractors of Israel,out comes references to Finkelstein.I sure would like to read what he says,and get an inkling of what his agenda realy is.Making more money no doubt.But,I call it blood money,and it stinks to high heaven.Wehave quite a few of his ilk,freedom of speech and all that. You said about the dangers of a tourist attraction is very apt.That isn't going to happen is obvious.They have yet to learn and live with each other,let alone be a partner for peace with Israel.Most unfortunate for them in this respect,until they realise this they are going to stagnate,stay there...

  • 268. 0 0
    250 Hey ELLEN are you really Iranian?You sound more like
    • Ralph
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:51

    GW's Washington poodle!

  • 267. 0 0
    249 - No my friend, the onus is on you
    • Bruriah Sarah
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:50

    Just because the PA and their cohorts are manufacturing historical inaccuracies, doesn't make it so. There is too much evidence to the contrary. Now where is your evidence???

  • 266. 0 0
    sara...the modern palestinians are
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:45

    the edomites[twin brother of jacob] who had [perpetual hatred toward jacob] of yesterday.mount seir and edom[these are esau's].and the promised land for jacob. the pioneer jews cultivated the land in the late 1800.when these jews from russia came back to their ancestral homeland-the land was uncultivated,swampy,and malaria infected place.

  • 265. 0 0
    #210 Clickfool
    • Observer
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:42

    Unfortunately the Brits will never know the truth as they are boycotted form the site.

  • 264. 0 0
    Herod
    • Harry
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:38

    What I like to know.Is there any historical evidence of what Herod is said to have done, the murdering of the children.Are there any Roman witnesses?I just know tha he was hated by the Jews as they looked upon him as a Roman collaborator.

  • 263. 0 0
    225JOE you sound like a professional Palestinian hater
    • lakshmi
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:37

    may be what bothers you is that with all the crimes committed against them by Israel they are still there, very much there.And the Unity Government is being increasingly recognised by many government around the world. Looks like they are there to stay.This,ofcourse, does not suit Israel's plans of a Greater Israel,does it ?

  • 262. 0 0
    #249 Well Bruriah; where have you been?
    • ballistic
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:36

    I have missed your "where is your evidence". Where is your evidence of a substantial presence by your people in that land. According to a recent program I saw about it on the History Channel, a rabbi said no real physical evidence of a SUBSTANIAL Jewish presence has been found and they are digging for it. His statements were a tad confusing because we see so many pictures of the 'Wailing Wall'. Is there any dispute about what that is? Regards.

  • 261. 0 0
    yisrael4ever....they still don't believe it,do they?
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:36

    muhammad got his interpretation from torah,but he twisted God's Word.

  • 260. 0 0
    In response to Hal Spears #239
    • Tosefta
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:33

    1. "Herod was an Idumian Arab who converted to Judaism." - Hal The Idumeans (Edomites) were not Arabs, although they were Semites, like the Jews. Of course, if you go a couple of millenia further back, you might say that all Semites came from Arabia. All this is before biblical times. Herod's family were Edomites, who were forcibly converted to Judaism some 70 yers before Herod's birth. Herod's mother was an Arab (Nabatean). 2. "Palestinians were in Palestine as far as the name Palestine existed, about 3500 years back." - Hal You may be referring to the arrival of the Philistines, about 1200 years ago. The name of the country as Palestine is only attested in the 5th cent. BC (Herodotus). 3. "Moses and the Israelites (not the Jews)never crossed the Sainai. There is not a single trace of Israelites in Palestine." - Hal Why do you accept the story of Israel going DOWN to Egypt but not the one of coming OUT of Egypt? Accept both or reject both. In any case, Israel was in Canaan AFTER the theorized time of the Exodus, as attested in the famous "Israel stele" of Merneptah (son of Ramesses the Great; no later than 1203 BC).

  • 259. 0 0
    no mention of Jesus....of course not.
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:31

    because He was risen from the dead.how could they find His bones-500 witnesses saw Him ascended to Heaven.

  • 258. 0 0
    Ronnie Wolman
    • Jason
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:28

    Please spare us from anymore of your stupid remarks.

  • 257. 0 0
    hal spears....don't tell me that judah was left in egypt.
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:28

    during the exodus.don't leave judah[the father of the jews] out.don't tell me that they left him in egypt.[that wasn't mentioned in the bible]judah was an israelite[because he was son of jacob[God changed his name to israel].don't you know that palestine was judea?where do palestinians get their names?from the term "palestine".the romans changed the name judea to palestine "to insult the jewish people".the people who remained in judea during the romans rule were jews[and benjamite?].the lost ten tribes of israel-I'm sure will be reunited with them in end times because God will regather them in the land of israel.

  • 256. 0 0
    Yeshua is the Messiah, but not a god.
    • Harold
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:26

    Have you ever noticed that none of the profecies about the Messiah states that he would be a god or semi-god? Isaiah 11's Emmanuel is not a messianic prophesy, since the boy was a sign that within 65 years the Northern Kingdom of Israel would be conquered by the Assirians. The word commonly traslated as "virgin" in this text is "almaha", which refers to a young lady, either married or not. But the precise hebrew word for "virgin" is "betulah", which is strictly used in this meaning along the Tanach. If the prophecy was so, then most women would have stayed unmarried because one of them would be the bearer of the Messiah, and thus would be violating the commandments of multiplying. Yeshua of Nazareth is the Messiah, but he is a biological son of Yosef and Miriam (Mary). Otherwise King David would have been despised, since he was promised that his "seed" would inherit the throne forever. If it was the "Holy Ghost's" seed, then King David has nothing to do, since Miriam was Levite.

  • 255. 0 0
    Pastafarian men
    • Yael S
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:26

    my email is Yael.solomon3000@gmail.com

  • 254. 0 0
    Clickfool # 238
    • io
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:25

    Bravo Clickfool!

  • 253. 0 0
    to Clickfool
    • Yael S
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:24

    So... are you from London? Maybe we can hook up to discuss your philosophy next time I'm in town. Yael.solomon3000@gmail.com

  • 252. 0 0
    Spotlight
    • Albert Seligman
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:15

    Sorry, mate, I haven't seen any of your contributions before, so I can't tell whether you're being ironic or yet another of those paranoid nutters who've nothing better to do than blame all their own personal failing on the Jews... Could you tell me which, without being sarcastic?

  • 251. 0 0
    #142 Say Dror; I like your upfront, cut to the heart of the matte
    • ballistic
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:14

    post. It doesn't muck up the issues with extraneous, often untrue BS that apologists throw about to justify what is going on over there. I also read your post on Posner's blog, the one about Israel being vulnerable, and boy was that an eye opener. The post sounded like a conversation between an unclean lady and her handler at any suggestion that she might be replaced for a more economically viable and attactive lady. You have my respect for being truthful as that is a rarity amongst apologists. It is not clear what you want the US to do, although it is clear what your thoughts are about the matter. If all you lay out in both posts is accepted as true, doesn't sound like the US has very many options. Keep blogging. Regards.

  • 250. 0 0
    Talkback
    • Ellen
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:13

    I can't believe these comments are becoming so political and full of hate. They are very entertaining to read though. I'm Iranian and see if you can find anything like these diverse points of view in any media in Iran. Half the people here would be in jail by now and the site would be closed.

  • 249. 0 0
    244 - Where is your evidence?
    • Bruriah Sarah
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:03

    Where is your archeological evidence? historical? Where is that confirmed by outside sources.... Funny Josephus never mentions the Pals.....

  • 248. 0 0
    For Yael S # 245
    • Clickfool
    • 08.05.07
    • 22:02

    "Where can I learn more about Pastafarianism and the men behind it?" I've heard about these Pastafarians. They're Italians who knot spaghetti into their hair, smoke dope and wear tie-dye T-shirts.

  • 247. 0 0
    toronto's finest re. #227...whether we like it or not.
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:57

    the jewish people own the land.no one can't change the Word of God[heaven and earth will pass away,but not His Word].God keeps His promise.His promise is everlasting.the promised land is an everlasting possession given by God to the children of jacob only.no invaders can claim this land-whether they like it or not,they will be defeated if they do.where are those who invaded the modern israel?they're all gone,but the jewish people are still here.they've tried to annihilate them since bible time.hitler thought he could destroy all of them.

  • 246. 0 0
    239 - Where is your evidence?
    • Bruriah Sarah
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:56

    Rhetoric does not count as evidence.

  • 245. 0 0
    Pastafarianism
    • Yael S
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:50

    Hi, I'm an attractive 21-year-old woman living Manhattan. Where can I learn more about Pastafarianism and the men behind it?

  • 244. 0 0
    Clickfool
    • The Spotlight
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:50

    Nice play on words there! No doubt this is a politicaly motivated "find" designed to further exclusive and triumphalist Jewish claims to lands to which they have highly dubious claims at best.

  • 243. 0 0
    Mark no 211
    • rich
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:46

    you forgot about raping their women ! How dare you not also tell everyone that the pals and arabs from morocco to yemen are suffering only because of the Israelis and all their conspiracies etc. and what about global warming caused by israel.... oh almost forgot, israel today giving USD 5M to Darfuris (muslims) Israel to become one of world's 10 largest donors to Darfuri refugees....must be another plot, conspiracy of the little satan....

  • 242. 0 0
    the palestinians don't have evidence ...
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:31

    to let out that they own the promised land.the only proof they had so far was outnumbering those jews who remained in palestine after the romans exiled the rest of them from their land.

  • 241. 0 0
    To Religion
    • Moury
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:25

    Actually, Israel is mentioned in the great texts of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. He, in all his Pasta Wisdom, granted this land NOT to the Jews, and NOT to the Palestinians. He granted it to his loyal Pastafarian followers, who will one day, return to their PROMISED LAND, and rejoice in our spaghetti wonderland we will create for ourselves.

  • 240. 0 0
    Amos (second try!!)
    • Danite
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:23

    I sent you a longer response to your question which didnt make it for some reason.So here is the short version.Dever takes the postion that most of the earliest Israelites were cannanites in desperate circumstances who fled the oppressive Egyptian Cannanite sytem in the lowlands to found a new society more in line with their intrests as oppossed to other who claim the majority of ancient israel should be seen as coming from outside of Cannan.This is a long and going dispute and Dever makes a good case for his point of view as well as giving an honest and good appraisal of the counter trends in the field.Reagrds

  • 239. 0 0
    In response to # 3 Herod was an Arab
    • Hal Spears
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:23

    Herod was an Idumian Arab who converted to Judaism. Palestinians were in Palestine as far as the name Palestine existed, about 3500 years back. Moses and the Israelites (not the Jews)never crossed the Sainai. There is not a single trace of Israelites in Palestine.

  • 238. 0 0
    The crying shame
    • Clickfool
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:23

    The Holy Land is crammed with the most amazing historical sites. The interest on Talkback in this story shows that tourism has the potential to become the biggest industry in the region, for Israelis and Palestinians alike, if there was peace. The absence of peace and goodwill is a crying shame.

  • 237. 0 0
    225 - that is funny!!!!!!
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:23

    "that will bring more tourists to Palestine". - Sure, if your vacation plans include being kidnapped, tortured, and shot in the back of the head. No doubt, with Iraq and Iran, future spring break American studends will flock to Palestine, to witness on site such attractions as filling up babies with bombs, hanging gays publicly, and training for suicide bombers. On a more reasonable note, anyone with a brain understands that there will be no independent Palestinian state in the next 50 years. Palestinian autonomous territories will remain the poorest place in the world for at least a century. Already most countries in sub-Saharan Africa are way richer than Palestine. At the rate they are going, they will soon surpass Haiti. The crime rate in the Palestinian territories, is one of the world's worst...The reason, I believe, is the avowed goal of Hamas, and many Palestinians - the extermination of the Israeli people, in the first stage, and the extermination of world Jewry after.

  • 236. 0 0
    # 226 Part two.Continued..THIS IS A TANGIBLE FIND
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:20

    Less than 10 years later,in 169/168 BCE,the next Seleucid king Antiochus 4th Epithanes-best known from the story of Hanukka-and his armies entered Jerusalem,massacredits inhabitants,robbed the Temple treasury,and desecrated the Holy of Hollies. The appointment recorded on the "stele"appears to mark the beginning of Greek/Seleucid intrference in Jewish religious affairs,which eventually led to the outbreak of the Maccabean revolt 167 BCE.The Helenistic inscription from Israel,said James.S.Sneider,director of the Israel Museum,"Itcontextualizes the Second Book of Maccabees and provides an independent and authentic source for an important episode in the history leading up to the Maccabean Revolt,whose victorious conclusions is celebrated each year during the Jewish feastival of Hanukka".The eight-day celebration commemorates the rededication of the Temple after the Maccabee'victory over the armies of Antiochus 4th over 2,100 years ago. P/S Haaretz please put out.Thanks

  • 235. 0 0
    For The Spotlight # 213
    • Clickfool
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:13

    "Is another Jewish Talmudic plot to fool the goyim afoot here? What do you think?" The innocence of all these believers is going to be massacred, I think.

  • 234. 0 0
    to amos.....herod the great ...the romans made him king.
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:12

    who had perpetual hatred toward the jews/israelites.he was pro-roman , the son of a man from idumea[edom].the roman senate made him king and gave him soldiers to seize the throne.as a friend and ally of the romans' he was not a truly independent king;however, rome allowed him a domestic policy of his own...

  • 233. 0 0
    true believer
    • Boycott
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:09

    Herod was a deeply unpleasant and cruel man, by any standards, who murdered his wife, some of his children, and other family members as well as many others. However, there is no evidence whatsoever apart from "Matthew" to suggest that he massacred any children in the way you describe.

  • 232. 0 0
    # 227 BS. I did NOT say that Jews never lived in present day ....
    • Toronto's Finest
    • 08.05.07
    • 21:06

    ...Israel. But that does not mean that they can claim it today. If their claim is good, why not the Turks, Syrians, Italians, Greeks...all these nationalities, and a few hundred more,who have also lived there

  • 231. 0 0
    herod's tomb
    • aage hauken
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:59

    Dear Sirs, could we please see some pictures of the fragments of the coffin of the king? I understand it was of a rare type in its day. with thanks and compliments, aage hauken, o.p.

  • 230. 0 0
    # 53 Akram-You may...Always add the Word of God. Our Creator will
    • Virginia
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:55

    get no fight from me. I Love Him, whatever He says...goes. I am looking to the day when I am among only those who feel the same. And looking to the day I know He rejoices over His own without anger or sorrow. This is something we should all be praying for. If only we wern't so busy seeking our own happiness, we could seek God's happiness. Then our own would just be.

  • 229. 0 0
    196nh ABOUT HEROD being a Palestinian it's not that far
    • sara
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:52

    fetched.Remember that the Philistines(mentioned in the OT) were in that region for a long time.There are approximately 3o + Philistine sites in Palestine.They are peoples from the Iron age and they introduced iron to Palestine.The Greeks and Romans west of the Levant called it the land of the Philistines(Palestina). Now, if you look at the sacrophagus of Herod it was obviously built in Greco Roman style.This style has ;many features borrowed from the ancient Philistines, who persisted for a long time in Palestine and eventually like many of the other tribes converted to Islam in the 7th century.

  • 228. 0 0
    amos...did I say that.
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:51

    the edomites,the modern palestinians belong to edom[the modern jordan].you know how the edomites were/are -they wanted/want the land that didn't/doesn't belong to them.the muslims want to rule the world,but they can't politically according to them.

  • 227. 0 0
    222 - The Jews Have lived in Israel for 3,000 years
    • Bruriah Sarah
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:47

    We have lots of evidence, including the archeology...over and over again...ancient synagogues, ancient graves - everywhere Around israel. Where is your proof????? Historical? Archeolgoical? Legal??? We even have a famous historian from the 1st century...Josephushttp://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/josephus/index.htm Rhetoric does not count as evidence.

  • 226. 0 0
    News Flash.FOR ANYONE INTERESTED JUST READ...
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:44

    Have any of you read of the recent 2,200-year old Greek-inscribed stone block that provides unique insight into the background to the Maccabean Revolt has been inveiled at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. The newly deciphered stele apparently came from the area between the Judean Hills and the Mediterranean.it was uncovered years ago but its historic content was unknown intil recently. It represents new information about Heliodorus,who,according to the Second Book of Maccabees,received orders to seize the treasure in the Temple in Jerusalem,but was driven from the sanctuary by miraculous appearance of a fearsome horsman acompanied by two mighty youths.Documents a correspondence in ancient Greek between Heliodorus and king Seleucus 4th,ruller of the seleucid Empire from 187/175 BCE,in which Seleucus announces the appointment of an administrator to oversee the sanctuaries within the province that included the Land of Israel.Conti,P/S Haaretz put out time consuming work...

  • 225. 0 0
    More Tourist for future Palestine!
    • American
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:42

    This is great for the Pals, this will bring more tourist to Palestine when a state is established...this place is way deep within the territories

  • 224. 0 0
    93 - Herod was King of the Jews
    • Bruriah Sarah
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:39

    http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/H/history/e-h/herod.html

  • 223. 0 0
    #49 Mike
    • Boycott
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:34

    "Needless to say, finding Herod`s tomb is another nail in the coffin to those who ridicule the Bible." How so? There have always been plenty of historical references to Herod the Great, in Josephus and in Roman documents. There was never any doubt that he lived, so it comes as no surprise that he had a tomb. In any case, the Bible is not one book but a large collection of books of many types, very few of which make any claim to be history, and none are what we would judge to be historically objective or accurate.

  • 222. 0 0
    # 3. It's all Israeli land, like Kossovo is Serbian land....
    • Toronto's Finest
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:25

    Norway belongs to France,England to Sweden, half of France to England. So what, that Jewish people lived there in biblical times. People have been migrating for millions of years. What we can't dispute, is that Palestinians were the majority in Palestine when it was declared a Jewish state...and they owned most of the land.

  • 221. 0 0
    Amos hello
    • Danite
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:22

    You knwo amos , it is the arabs that are the major history deniers here.They try to erase jewish hsitory in israel at every turn.

  • 220. 0 0
    Herod's death and Ancient Greek inscription, dating to 178 B.C.E.
    • Gerald
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:17

    Herod is first and formost an historical figure, with or without the Bible. In the Ancient Greek inscription, dating to 178 B.C.E., newly displayed in the Israel Museum, there is evidence for Heliodoros, an official who, according to 2 Maccabees, was beatten by angels and a magnificent rider when he entered the Temple to plunder it. Let those whoever wants to conclude that the inscription prooves the existence of G.d too, believe it... Why not? It does not bother me...

  • 219. 0 0
    # 121 TC - try to get past your ignorance
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:16

    " According to Joe, Masada is a "myth"" No, according to:" Nachman Ben-Yehuda is the author of Sacrificing Truth. Mr. Ben-Yehuda is a sociologist and dean of the faculty of social sciences at Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He is also the author of The Masada Myth: Collective Memory and Mythmaking in Israel (University of Wisconsin Press, 1995)." http://chronicle.com/colloquylive/2002/12/masada/ Read a book and get a clue. " So the entire archaeological and historical establishment must be conducting a lengthy and elaborate hoax" No, archaeological establishment-NOT BIBLE FANATICS-have done a good job exposing the hoaxes, mostly by so called Zionist archaelogists. Did you know Dayan considered himself an archaeologist? General Yigael Yadin, who supposedly uncovered masada was proven a fraud BY ISRAELI ARCHAEOLOGISTS. As for Jewish history in China, I provided a source. If you want to be dismissive and cling to myths and lies, that's your perogative.

  • 218. 0 0
    maria
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:15

    Its good that you acknowledge the historical tie that Pals have to the land.

  • 217. 0 0
    #192 Press Release and squaring the facts on the finds
    • Fairplay
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:15

    I have no wish to impugne Netzer's personal reputation. However, no scholar is infallible and each new claim carries its risks, the more so when borne on intense enthusiasm (turning possibilities into certainties). On the face of the evidence that has been produced so far, I see at best circumstantial evidence (in the words of the BBC) - some sculpted shards of limestone which may possibly come from a sarcophagus, and fragments of a paved floor - but no human remains or inscription that could clinch the claim. For a start, I would expect Herod's sarcophagus to be of marble, not cheap and cheerful limestone. Politics has nothing to do with it!

  • 216. 0 0
    Clickshmok re Sara
    • Albert Seligman
    • 08.05.07
    • 20:11

    Someone desperately trying since 1972 to make out his case... scraping the bottom of the barrel and prone to inventing evidence. Your remarks betray something very much akin to what Freud describes as "transference".

  • 215. 0 0
    Danite
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:55

    Can you give me a synopse? :) Although I (again) have put it in my amazon basket to be included in my next order. Thanks! I love this stuff.

  • 214. 0 0
    To Ronnie Wolman
    • Harry D
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:52

    I tip my hat to you, sir!

  • 213. 0 0
    Clickfool
    • The Spotlight
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:43

    Is another Jewish Talmudic plot to fool the goyim afoot here? What do you think?

  • 212. 0 0
    King Herod`s tomb
    • Gary
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:39

    Can someone tell me what happen to the edomite

  • 211. 0 0
    197 JOE from NY, there is a simple reason for Ramallah
    • Mark
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:38

    Joe being poor.The Israelis stole their land,destroyed more than 1,000 of their villages, stole whatever they could from the flousrishing towns,crafts , trade, cottage industry, textiles,agriculture,Palestinian grain being famous in the region.Even today,the settlers are burning Palestinian olive groves and almond tree down.See the latest on the village of Ramin.

  • 210. 0 0
    For Sara # 205
    • Clickfool
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:36

    I think you're right to be sceptical, Sara. The archaeologist, searching since 1972, wanted to find Herod's tomb a little too much, probably.

  • 209. 0 0
    This is FANTASTIC news! The more knowledge the better!
    • Toronto's Finest
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:32

    Any reasonable person has to be overjoyed that some new knowledge will come to light. How did we get so many nonsense posts on a such a straight forward piece of NEWS?

  • 208. 0 0
    Hey Amos!
    • Danite
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:31

    Another book for you that you will LOVE.It is called "Who were the ancient israelites and where did they come from?" By William Dever.It gets right into the issues we were discussing.Also as the good scholar he is the author not only gives his ideas but reviews all the major trends in the field.Regards

  • 207. 0 0
    tooeasy
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:21

    Actually, Ceaser lived before Christ, the Catholic Church had an ecumenical council that debated when exactly Jesus was born and when they concluded that it was 2007 years ago (by our present date) they decided that the calendar should begin from there.

  • 206. 0 0
    Tosefta please think
    • Danite
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:19

    The criteria is not whether he was Jewish by todays standards but rather by the standards of the time.Herod only faced questions as to whether he was really jewish once he started going scitsoid and the people began to hate him.The fact that thousands of Idumean fighters cam to help in Jerusalem and that Shimon Bar Giora was of Idumean ancestry shows that by and large the Idumeans were accepted as Jews.Please read a little more.Thanks and of course have a very nice day.

  • 205. 0 0
    BBC reports that the evidence for Herod's tomb is circumstantical
    • sara
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:17

    i.e. carbon testing, some coins found at the site.Until there is documented evidence in stone,i.e. inscriptions there will be some scepticism.

  • 204. 0 0
    #175 The School of Heinrich
    • Kate
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:14

    You wonder how anyone concluded that this was Herod's tomb based on a single sentence. It would be a good question - if we were all gathered around an archaeological report. But this (see article above) is a brief press release from a world renowned archaeologist.

  • 203. 0 0
    Jim
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:13

    It can still be secular without denying history, we are not changing the names of Planets like Mars because they refer to a Roman god...we use it within the context of our history.

  • 202. 0 0
    michael ???
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:09

    What do the number of Jews vs Christians have anything to do with BC and AD and how they are used? you lost me...

  • 201. 0 0
    herod's tomb
    • ast
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:08

    Great!... the more archaeology the better....will be good to know all the details and if there are any inscriptions etc... Jerusalem is so fascinating.

  • 200. 0 0
    144: why is this important to you?
    • velvel of decatur
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:08

    given that the b.c./a.d. and bce/ce designations are entirely arbitrary and artificial, why is this important to you? i grew up in the south of the 50's when grammar school started with the pledge to the american flag and then the recital of the Lord's Prayer and my conclusion was that if the Christians reciting the prayer lived by the prayer it would be a better place. so what have you done to live by your prayer, bubbelah?

  • 199. 0 0
    Alan SA
    • Amos
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:08

    No one has said the Jews never lived in Israel...people are just saying it was NEVER just Jews...people were there before and after their expulsion. Herod was more a Roman than anything else.

  • 198. 0 0
    # 174 Jake
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 19:05

    "And do we ever doubt that William the Conqueror, duke of Normandy and enemy of Saxon England, was a legitimate King of England?" Wrong analogy. William was king of England, but Norman by descent. Furthermore, the discussion here is about the question whether or not Herod was a Jew. A question of historical interest, but with no relevance to the present.

  • 197. 0 0
    I feel sorry for Ramallah Joe
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:59

    He lives in one of the poorest, most awful and dangerous places in the world - Ramallah. Neither he nor his kids, nor his grandkids will ever know anything but poverty, disease, and conflict. Meanwhile, the Israelis have good jobs and spend their vacations in Austria. Joe - if it makes you feel good that Russia and Poland are more Jewish than Palestine, good for you. If it makes you feel good that king Herod was a Greek/Roman/Arab, or whatever, good for you. The reality is that Israelis are rich, Saudis are rich, the Americans are VERY rich (Zionist rule in America turns out to be pretty good thing for the economy), and the Palestinians, with their 1500 dollar a year, are just about the poorest people on the planet (twice poorer than India, and who knew that ANY entity can actually be poorer than India). Unfortunately, they will remain so - as they have chosen to spend their time pondering antiquity instead of studying computers...

  • 196. 0 0
  • 195. 0 0
    Better get a DNA test
    • Tosefta
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:50

    There might be some remains in the sarcophagus which will enable a DNA test (as in the recent "Jesus and his family" find. Mitochondrial DNA passes thru the mother's line unchanged. It might enable the identification of some descendants today. Incidentally, Herod's mother was an Arab (Nabatean) so it is not clear that Jews would be too interested in such a descent, but Palestinians might. The problem would be that Herod's ancestors (Idumeans) were converted to Judaism by force (by John Hyrcanus I) so halakhically, according to today's standards in any case, Herod might not have been a real Jew. On the other hand, perhaps his mother converted according to today's Halakha (unlikely), so Herod was OK after all.

  • 194. 0 0
    to fady from egypt
    • melinda
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:50

    To fady.... I don't know how violent was the reign of herod but YOU certainely show a high propension to violence. Quite scary to read you.

  • 193. 0 0
    to fady from egypt
    • Melinda
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:48

  • 192. 0 0
    171Fairplay Be fair: Have you read Netzer's previous studies?
    • Michigan
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:43

    So many published. Have you found any one wrong? Or are you basing your attack on a media scoop report? Or on your political views?

  • 191. 0 0
    Scotty and Jesus
    • Johnny
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:42

    You wrote: "Why no mention of the Jesus/Herod connection in this article as mentioned in the New Testament". Well maybe because the article has nothing to do with Jesus? There are numerous things one could mention in any article, but generally the text of an article tends to only contain information relevant to the topic.

  • 190. 0 0
    To Michael IF
    • Anne
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:35

    You might be right.I also wonder, how accurate history has been written since 3000 years ago during many hundred years(The Bible)by the "writers" whose view of the world outside must have been more than limited.

  • 189. 0 0
    To Everyone here.WE HAVE COME.....
    • Kath'
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:34

    Like Mark Anthony said:I HAVE COME TO BURRY CAESAR NOT TO PRAISE HIM. AND IT APPLIES TO HEROD WHO WAS A MONSTER OF A MAN,AND DIED FROM A PUTRIFICATION IN THE GUT.HE WAS THE ONE WHO MURDERED "THE INNOCENTS"ON HEARING THAT A JEWISH BOY WAS BORN TO LEAD THE NATION. AFTER ALL THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT ARCHEOLOGY AND NOT FOR ANYONE TO GET "HOT UNDER THE COLLAR"TAKE IT ALL EASY AND CALMLY AND VIEW IT IN ITS PERSPECTIVE....

  • 188. 0 0
    MichaelF They found the missing part of the puzzle
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:34

    It was about a moyle away.

  • 187. 0 0
    sh: As with everything else in the ME the plot is missing
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:33

    Somebody didnt just forget the plot they buried it.

  • 186. 0 0
    Colin, the sarcophagus was smashed
    • Jake
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:19

    If it took that long to find Herod's tomb on Herodion, that is a strong indication that it is not just some decoy, a possibility which would have been seriously considered by the archeologists. Besides, the sarcophagus was smashed in ancient times, indicating that his contempories had good reason to believe it was the real thing.

  • 185. 0 0
    Ronnie Wolman's high hopes.
    • sh
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:18

    He wasn't found at all so no-one'll be able to check. An empty, "special" sarcophagus was found that is thought to be Herod's. Empty vessels make most noise!

  • 184. 0 0
    180MichaelF Nonsense, see 174Jake
    • Michigan
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:17

    And many Kings of Judea had foreign mothers, beginning with Solomon's son. They all, like Herod, were accepted as Jews, though some of them may have been nasty Jews. And mothers did not have to be circumcised.

  • 183. 0 0
    #133 - Anne
    • MichaelF
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:11

    Herod was a man capable of both great kindness and great cruelty. He never used slaves in his building projects, but well-paid freemen. At the same time, he thought nothing of killing family members, including at least one son I believe, at a whim. The Talmud relates that Herod did indeed act kindly at times to the common people, but his motivation was not pure. He was hoping to impress the rabbis of the time so that they would endorse his rule. It did not work, since Herod was not of the Davidic line (and probably was not have even been halachically Jewish), the rabbis rejected him as a legitimate king. I would not rely on NT accounts of Herod. It is not exactly the most accurate history of the time -- having been written a generation later by persons with their own agenda.

  • 182. 0 0
    # 177 Michigan
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:07

    "In King Herod`s private fortress and Palace?" This palace was certainly home to a lot of people - "Herod's tomb found" makes a nice headline, but without epigrahic or iconographic evidence on the sarkophagus I doubt that this claim remains unchallenged as soon as the media hype is over.

  • 181. 0 0
    #159 - Ronnie
    • MichaelF
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:05

    If Herod was circumcised, I suspect the evidence has long since decayed.

  • 180. 0 0
    #160 - Adel
    • MichaelF
    • 08.05.07
    • 18:03

    Herod may have had Jewish blood going back two or three generations (debatable), but since his mother was not halachicly a Jew, he was not considered a Jew. He never formerly converted. The people at the time considered him a foreigner, which he was, and never accepted him as a true king.

  • 179. 0 0
    160Adel Herod spoke Hebrew, not Arabic
    • Michigan
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:59

    And Edumeans were never Arabs, not in Roman history, nor any other, except the mythology that is just being invented today by you and your ilk...

  • 178. 0 0
    On Herod
    • Clickfool
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:57

    "Herod, also known as Herod the Great, is credited with expanding the Second Temple and building Caesarea, Masada, and many other monumental construction projects" Herod was a brown-noser to the Roman Empire, kept in place only because of his fawning to the Enperor. He was also a nasty piece of work, famously butchering two of his sons, fearing they were about to topple him. Augustus famously said of him that it was safer to be Herod's pig than his son. That someone should choose to desecrate his grave is unsurprising.

  • 177. 0 0
    175Heinrich Schliemann, who is no Schliemann, no expert
    • Michigan
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:53

    "There were no other Big Cheeses living in Judea during Herod the Great`s time who would have also merited such a fancy sarcophagus?" In King Herod's private fortress and Palace? Makes as much sense as your pseudonym...

  • 176. 0 0
    King Herod
    • Sharon
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:26

    Regarding the comments of Christoph, about the timing of Herod: The discovered tomb was that of Herod the Great. The Herod that you're thinking about was his son, Herod Antipas. He's the one who saw Jesus at his trial.

  • 175. 0 0
    This Represents Scholarship?
    • Heinrich Schliemann
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:23

    "Although there were no bones in the container, he said the sarcophagus' location and ornate appearance indicated it was Herod's." There were no other Big Cheeses living in Judea during Herod the Great's time who would have also merited such a fancy sarcophagus?

  • 174. 0 0
    The Cohanim accepted Herod's patronage in rebuilding the Temple
    • Jake
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:23

    By Jewish law, only patronage and finances of a Jew could be accepted in the construction of the Temple. That is why the Cohanim agreed to carry out the Temple's construction under Herod's patronage. He was at least nominally recognized as being a Jew, while Emperor Julian was turned down for rebuilding the Temple. It is absolutely true Herod was viewed with suspicion, and his ousting of the Levite Hashmonean dynasty was seen as illegitmate usurpation, which is why Herod married into the Hashmonean family. But this does not change the fact that he was a Jew and a king of the Jews. By the same token, King Henry VIII of England, who was a cruel tyrranical paranoid leader yet a glorious king, was of the Tudor family, which was an obscure Welsh family that was for years seen as usurping outsiders by the established Plantagenet aristocracy. And do we ever doubt that William the Conqueror, duke of Normandy and enemy of Saxon England, was a legitimate King of England?

  • 173. 0 0
    BCE
    • tooeasy
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:22

    the problem is easily solve if you remember that the Roman calendar is based on the ceasars not on JC, hence bc was indicative of before ceasar, julius to be specific. The change was made by the Holy Roman Church some centurys later.

  • 172. 0 0
    What devices are in his tomb?
    • John
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:11

    So will we learn of any new devices found in his tomb? King Herod was quite the engineer and nearly created the steam engine. He created many other devices. He was a very smart man and ahead of his time.

  • 171. 0 0
    Let's see the evidence!
    • Fairplay
    • 08.05.07
    • 17:10

    Prof Netzer has so far failed to produce conclusive evidence of Herod's tomb. It turns out that he has only a few small sherds of a rather mediocre red limestone sarcophagus, but these don't include any inscription mentioning King Herod or other defining proof. Might this possibly be no more than one of those sensational press releases, put out as ego trips by scholars craving immortal fame - just like Herod?

  • 170. 0 0
    BC & AD to Linkman
    • Brian
    • 08.05.07
    • 16:34

    I'll pray for you brother and hope that one day you'll wake up and smell the roses. Everyone knows God exist, but the majority choose not to live by his word simply because you can't give up your lifestyle (drinking, drugs, sex, whatever). Look around my friend at nature, the bible, archaeology, the stars, the planets. There is a creator out there and his name is God the father, God the Son and the Holy Spirit. I hope you find him brother.

  • 169. 0 0
    Boycott #168
    • Mickey
    • 08.05.07
    • 16:24

    You are right maybe us Zionists should not rely on Herod to prove our Jewish roots in Israel maybe we can simply rely on Jesus instead

  • 168. 0 0
    #3 Kinishin
    • Boycott
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:47

    "This find of Herod`s tomb and grave is just more proof that this is Israeli land and always has been Israeli Land." Nothing of the kind! In any case, Herod was an Idumean (Edomite), he might nowadays be classed as an Arab. He called himself "the Great", and was hated by the Jewish nationalists of his time! Not the kind of person a Zionist like yourself should pay heed to.

  • 167. 0 0
    American Hegemon? Who installed Israel?
    • Tom Roberts
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:34

    Voice of reason, check your sources, America hegemony or not, did not install Israel as you put it, in your comparison. Ever hear of the British? Insulting America is not only trendy, but suicidal if you call yourself an Israeli. Though America did not install Israel, if the US was not here, Israel would be called something quite different today.

  • 166. 0 0
    rex turbulentus
    • Xavier
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:27

    La historia le debe recordar por sus grandes obras monumentales en Masada, Cesarea y Jerusalén, aunque aspectos relevantes de su reinado dejan mucho que desear, mantuvo su gobierno a través del terror y la brutalidad si bien otros reyes contemporáneos le sobrepasaron, veasé el armenio Tigranes o el persa Ariobarzanes.

  • 165. 0 0
    Alan - I have to call you out! #34
    • William
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:21

    I don't know where you get your facts from, but its obviously not a normal news source. Infact, your claims are so off - I'm surprised you even read Haaretz. 1) When were Israelis digging under the Dome of the Rock? The most recent dig was above ground and outside the walls of the Temple Mount. 2) What historic building used by the Supreme Council was destroyed? What year, by whom, and exactly where was it? 3) Not one Christian place (or person) has ever been attacked by Israel. Infact, it was Israel that saved Ascension Square in Nazareth from Muslims who wanted a Mosque in its place. Let's not forget the Muslim takeover of the place of Jesus' birth some years ago. In all due respect, it appears that this find just solidifies Jewish historical rule and the story of supreme ownership, just as the other finds Palestinians try to destroy today. Sorry to disappoint you.

  • 164. 0 0
    historical inventions of the Arabs & their friends
    • Eliyahu
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:17

    Alan #34 has been listening to the wrong informants. Arab & pro-Arab propagandists [like ex-prez of USA, jiminy cricket] have been inventing history for many years. The Arabs' own Quran says that their Allah assigned the Holy Land to the Jews [sura 5:20-22] & that the Jews would return to their land. Arab auxiliary troops helped the Romans besiege Jerusalem, crush the Jewish revolt & destroy the Temple built at Herod's orders by kohanim [members of the Jewish priestly caste] in the year 70 CE. On this, see Roman historian Tacitus, 5:1 Also at link below: http://ziontruth.blogspot.com/2005/05/arabs-helped-romans-destroy-temple.html As to Herod, his family had been converted before he was born. He was born a Jew. His father Antipater had been an advisor to a Jewish Hasmonean king. The Edomites were not Arabs but descended from Esau & spoke a language close to Hebrew, both Edomite & Hebrew being Canaanite dialects.

  • 163. 0 0
    Why all the hate?
    • Jack
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:13

    I thought for the most part Jews and Christians were fairly friendly with each other, but from reading a few comments here I see way too much negativity. I too thought it was a little odd to see no reference to JC in this article, but that's coming from my own Christian perspective. Any time I have made my way to this website it was to read an article having something to do with Israel, or Palestine or some problem in the troubled "middle east". I always assumed this was an Israeli news site and therefore written and edited from that perspective. If an Israeli news site has chosen not to use BC or AD in an article, I see no problem with that. So long as I know what BCE and CE mean and can make sense of it. I know that most Christians wouldn't be all that thrilled if they were forced to use BM (Before Muhammed),BB (Before Buddha) or BJS (Before Joseph Smith) when trying to reference past time...

  • 162. 0 0
    HEROD'S TOMB
    • GLS
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:13

    TO #28. JESUS IS YOUR LORD WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. YOU WILL AND NOT MAYBE ONE DAY CONFESS THAT WITH YOUR OWN LIPS.

  • 161. 0 0
    The tomb is not in East Jerusalem
    • Tamir Gaza
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:08

    It has nothing to do with the Palestinian future capital.

  • 160. 0 0
  • 159. 0 0
    Lets all Pray that he Was found Circumcized!!!!
    • Ronnie Wolman
    • 08.05.07
    • 15:03

    Us Jews need some good snippets of news.

  • 158. 0 0
    BCE Revisited
    • Max
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:48

    I agree on the BCE issue. It always amazes me that we will throw back 2000 years of history to be politically correct. We wouldn't want to use any religious references in history, would we.. Of course we forget where many of the names of days of the week, months, and planets came from. Then again, those were put in place by the closed minded-Christians.... wait... I guess I have that backwards. It is a shame that good research is even slightly tainted by PC talk.

  • 157. 0 0
    to linkman
    • Stephan
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:44

    If the world TRULY made Jesus its Lord, then all the trouble everyone is having in the world would be nonexistant. Neverthelesss, it will happen, voluntarily or not. One day "every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord" I will pray that God will open your eyes to the truth. The day will come when it cannot be denied.

  • 156. 0 0
    Try to live the year 2007!
    • Lena
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:41

    Israel just celebrated it's 59 th of Independence! Good.It has all the rights to exists.There are only so many, who consider that the internationally accepted borders are not enough, but they want more...based on what happened over 2000 years ago.What about the other nations worldwide would behave like this.Once again -what a mess!

  • 155. 0 0
    herod's tomb
    • bob
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:41

    joe herod an arab; you are quite amusing! palestine is the name the romans gave to judea after crushing the great rebellion and attempting to obliterate the true name of the region. instead of engaging in meaningless rhetoric it is about time that palestinian - or should i say arab - leaders abandon corruption and exploitation of their people [if possible] and deal with reality? perhaps then, you would not be emailing from 'occupied palestine'

  • 154. 0 0
    Herod's tomb . . .
    • Midway Mac
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:31

    I'm surprised that heratic former USA President Bill Clinton hasn't taken credit for the discovery. Or at least credited the Li'l Dentist from Egypt, Yasser Erefatt, or his Wife Suha.

  • 153. 0 0
    A couple things
    • Eddyyyster
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:26

    OK. first it's AD and BC for the dates. Not that BCE and CE crap. 2nd, Why is there no reference to Herod's biblical exploits? The whole reason anyone even knows who he is, is because of his attempt to kill Jesus Christ as a baby.

  • 152. 0 0
    # 145 Rabbit
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:25

    "So, by your choice of precedent, Israel must deal with the Arabs just like Turkey with Greeks - give them "Nansen passports" and deport them to neighbouring Arab countries, don`t you think?" Drawing historical analogies is always weak, and yours especially - If there was a Jewish and a Palestinian state, and if both agree to a MUTUAL population transfer (you preferred not to mention that not only Greeks were driven from Turkey, but also Turks from Greece), and if only the concept of population transfer was acceptable in the 21st century - then your analogy would make sense. Otherwise, it does not.

  • 151. 0 0
    2 billion people want to know....
    • Scotty
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:16

    Why no mention of the Jesus/Herod connection in this article as mentioned in the New Testament? I hope it's oversight rather than blatant censorship that the name of Jesus has been omitted. Herod is not famous (or infamous - a more apt description) because he was a "king of the Jews", his "fame" throughout history was in connection with the name of Jesus - period. Again, why no mention of Jesus in this article? There are an estimated 2 billion Christians worldwide who would ask the same question if they read this article.

  • 150. 0 0
    Before Common Era
    • El Duane Whatley
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:15

    The Common Era is the era of Jesus Christ. The era before that was not much of an era. It was mostly just time. Jesus, or Yeshua ben Joseph, was one of those Jewish fellows who did well, and was remembered.

  • 149. 0 0
    # 131 chanah
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:13

    "they did not come from anywhere else - they were here, in Israel." My bible says the Jews DID come from elsewhere, Egypt, and conquered what you try to present as never anything else but Jewish.

  • 148. 0 0
    Never Understood Any of This...
    • US Citizen
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:11

    As #60 et al pointed out... I always thought Palestinians were just former Jews who converted to Christianity and then to Islam. The discovery of Herod's Tomb should make no difference regarding the legitimacy of Israel as a state - which is already more legitimate than fifty percent of the states in the region.

  • 147. 0 0
    140: Matt, the problem is AD
    • David Teich
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:10

    I have no problem with BC, though BJ would be more accurate (though too entrendra'ish...), after all, Jews believe he was Jesus, not the Christ. It's the "After God" part. Meanwhile, it's not the same as Wednesday. Show me a large modern religious group following Woden, with political power and a history of slaughtering Jews. Got one? Didn't think so.

  • 146. 0 0
    Maube a false tomb.
    • Colin.
    • 08.05.07
    • 14:09

    It is hard for me to believe that such a cunning builder such as Herod would build a tomb that he knew would be plundered. It was a common practice in antiquity. What Ehud Netzer most probably found was a false tomb that acted like a monument and decoy to where he actually is buried.

  • 145. 0 0
    To Axel #135
    • Rabbit
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:56

    "Neither Turkish ruins in Greece nor Greek ruins in Turkey were ever regarded as a reasonable basis for territorial claims" No, what counted was brute force - the Turks simply won the war against Greece (the war was started by Greece, BTW). So, by your choice of precedent, Israel must deal with the Arabs just like Turkey with Greeks - give them "Nansen passports" and deport them to neighbouring Arab countries, don't you think?

  • 144. 0 0
    The year of our Lord 2007
    • William R. Smith
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:54

    Your editors ought to quash this anti-religious, anti-Christian style function of BCE, CE, ad nauseum. You will regret ever taking it up much sooner than you think....like when you are forced to submit to Islam and convert... you will wonder where the Christians are to rescue you....no doubt about it...

  • 143. 0 0
    God bless us everyone
    • Unknown Comic
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:50

    The things that are propulgated in the name of religion? Close your eyes, relax and float downstream.....imagine there's no heaven. It's easy if you try.

  • 142. 0 0
    despite all the ignorance
    • Dror
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:48

    finding Herod does not strengthen the Jews claim over our homeland. What does strengthen our claim, our sovereignty, and our right to live here is what all other nations use to make their claims, SHEER BRUTE MILITARY FORCE. May the jews never forget how this vile world of man works. We will not be its' sacrifice and we will not be some goddamn leftist experiment that will lead to our destruction and enslavement.

  • 141. 0 0
    BCE and ACE
    • Mike S.
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:46

    For those of you wondering about BCE and ACE: it is just another attempt by the God haters to eradicate anything to do with Christianity, meaning Jesus. After all, BC and AD refer to the periods before and after Christ's birth.

  • 140. 0 0
    BCE, CE and the Calendar
    • Matt
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:45

    Complaining about use of AD and BC is akin to complaining about the use of Wednesday as the name of the 4th day of the week because it is derived from the name of the god Woden. That is accepted, so why can't AD and BC?

  • 139. 0 0
    HEROD was an honorary Roman, although the son of Antipater
    • lakshmi
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:39

    an Idumean.After many intrigues and assasinations he was installed by Marc Antony as King of Judea.His buildings are in the Roman style and the port of Caesaera was his most ambitious project(for Rome) and was constructed along the lines of other such constructions in the Roman world.The temple that he built was to please his Jewish subjects.His conversion to Judaism was skin deep and was done to keep his Jewish subjects happy.Apparently they were not. All in all, while interesting historically and archeologically,all that this discovery proves is that the Romans were rulers of the region. And after the defeat of the Jewish revolts conclusively by 120 AD. the jews dispersed and came as far away as India,where you still have a jewish synagogue on the west coast.Christianity gained ascendance by the 3rd century AD and ofcourse by the 7th Islam.Culturally and ethnically the various tribes then became Islamic.

  • 138. 0 0
    What a mess this world would be
    • Lena
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:37

    ...if all the nations would examine the over 2000 years old graves and start to use them as the basis of their demandings...who has the right to live here or there.The Romans ? Maybe almost the whole Europe should belong to Italy, or maybe to Turkey (Ottomans), or the nordic pays to Sweden?

  • 137. 0 0
    misinformation
    • Angus
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:36

    Most of what I read in others responses was inaccurate and a waste of time. For those who are interested in truth I suggest that you download the free “e-Sword program and then download the ISBE under dictionaries.You will find quite a lot of well researched info of the Herod’s there.

  • 136. 0 0
    king by the romans
    • Marc
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:30

    Herod's religion does not matter, he was made king by the romans. Does that mean, ROMA to lay hands on Israel??? Archaeologie is some science about the past, the long gone past, there are no political claims to rely on it.

  • 135. 0 0
    # 123 Rabbit
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:22

    "the Greeks ( million and a half of them) were ethnically cleansed from Asia Minor in 1923 (ever heard about Treaty of Lausanne and population exchange between Greece and Turkey?)" Which exactly corroborates my point. Neither Turkish ruins in Greece nor Greek ruins in Turkey were ever regarded as a reasonable basis for territorial claims. Exclusively the Zionists discuss such rubbish.

  • 134. 0 0
    this will help Palestinian tourism
    • Ernst
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:21

    the Herodium is an intreresting site that will be another great tourist attraction for the state of Palestine. With Herod being a foreign occupier, the Palestinians will see his burial place as another example of a dictator tryiong to occupy and oppress the Palestinians. In the end, nothing but the grave is left and a distannt, unpleasant memory. The graves of all the Israeli soldiers and civilians that help illegally occupy the Westbank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, will one day be moved, so probably in a few centuries from now, nothing will remind us from those dark days of Israeli occupation. Maybe the remnants of the concrete seperation wall will be shown as a symbol of the fruitless Israeli effort to put the Palestinian people down, to get them to leave...

  • 133. 0 0
    King Herod - a hero?
    • Anne
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:20

    Reading any historians'description of King Herod, it has been mentioned that his rule ended in terror.Herod's monarchy was based on foreign weapons,also the start of his reign was marked by bloodshed.To many,herod is best known for his alleged role in the events known as the "Massacre of the Innocents". A Roman, a jew or arab(at least her mother) - but not a hero? Or?

  • 132. 0 0
    Article Troubling
    • Ken Good
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:14

    I do not know which is more troubling about this article: the replacement of the designations BC and AD with CE (common era) and BCE (before common era) or the failure to mention Herod's place in history regarding Jesus Christ. This is just another demonstration of taking all religious references out of history. This is incredible to me.

  • 131. 0 0
    Axel # 113
    • ChanahS
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:09

    "So what? You will find a lot of Greek ruins in Asia Minor, does that mean the Greeks should move in and the Turks should move out?" Becasue Greece was an expansionist empire that went to war to conquer other lands, as did the Romans, which is why you will find Roman ruins in Syria and London. WHere else in the world will you find Jewish ruins - only in Israel - they did not come from anywhere else - they were here, in Israel.

  • 130. 0 0
    Herod's Jewishness
    • Dan
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:09

    for a recent and very informative discussion see Shaye D Cohen The Beginnings of Jewishness -NB: this was an issue at the time as well and also one which carried on to his descendants as Josephus describes Herod's father and grandfather came from Idumeans converts - this was one of two mass conversions he describes which happened during the Hasmonean period - what this actually meant is anyone's guess what is clear is that all this happened before the rabbinic rule that one is Jewish because of one's mother being Jewish - patrilineal descent was key at this stage

  • 129. 0 0
    BCE and CE
    • Rob Gold
    • 08.05.07
    • 13:08

    Let see... We are in a movement here to make BCE mean "before Christian Era" and CE meaning "Christian Era". You politically correct people will never win DUH!!!

  • 128. 0 0
    # 122 - dana, Ok, I will respond later today.
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:49

    Hi dana...I will read over it and respond later in the day. I need to step out and enjoy the smell of opression. It's so invigorating knowing my 10 minute trip will take 2 hours. Later.

  • 127. 0 0
    What a pity!
    • Frank
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:48

    Scientists who seriously work for the benefit of all mankind make a sensational finding -- and then a bunch of primitives tramps in and has nothing better to write than that this is a clear proof of present territorial demands of this or that group. In his work "Nationalism" Elie Kedourie points out: "Nationalists exploit the past in order to transmute the present." Actually those remote leaders and peoples had nothing to do with such a square Weltanschauung.

  • 126. 0 0
    116: More importantly, Peter, Jewish and Christian artifacts
    • David Teich
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:47

    Go back much further on the Arabian Peninsula than do Muslim artifacts. The Muslim Arabs, of course, slaughtered their predecessors, as proudly described in the Koran. Yet I somehow doubt that Joe's about to demand Saudi Arabia be given back to Jews and Christians.

  • 125. 0 0
    Re: #120, Joe
    • TC
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:38

    Joe states, "I embrace the rich history of my country, Jewish, Muslim and Christian and others. It`s all good and should be cherished not distorted for political agenda. I don`t care who did what 2,000 years ago." But it seems that he doesn't embrace everyone, or, as his last sentence explicitly tells us, all the history. Indeed, history shouldn't be distorted for political agenda! At any rate, I recommend Kenneth Kitchen's "On the Reliability of the Old Testament" for readers generally. There's more than enough evidence for a temple far older than the one Ben Ezra synagogue, and even the biblical minimalists Joe mentions (who never exposed Masada as a myth!) don't deny that.

  • 124. 0 0
    56 Moshe - correction
    • Davids
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:28

    "Is this the same Herod that allowed the Pharisee`s to send Jesus to the cross and then washed his hands of the whole affair?" No, Moshe, that's not quite right. Jesus was turned over to the Roman Governor, Pontius Pilate. He sent Jesus on to Antipas, a decendant of Herod the Great. Antipas ridiculed Jesus and sent him back to Pilate. When the Pharisees insisted that Jesus be crucified rather than released, Pilate washed his hands, indicating that he disclaimed the guilt of putting the innocent to death.

  • 123. 0 0
    To Axel #113
    • Rabbit
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:22

    "So what? You will find a lot of Greek ruins in Asia Minor, does that mean the Greeks should move in and the Turks should move out?" FYI - the Greeks ( million and a half of them) were ethnically cleansed from Asia Minor in 1923 (ever heard about Treaty of Lausanne and population exchange between Greece and Turkey?)

  • 122. 0 0
    Hello Joe #115 - can you please look in
    • dana
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:22

    On the Bradley column (the bye-bye left one - still up). You are needed there. I am all by my lonesome in the ring with no cheering section or support functions against an articulate and analytical Tim R, who really really wants to talk to you about zionism (but read my replies to you first, OK? prefer not to go there). Well, there is American in NY on my left flank (who has greatly improved since the last BB board). But the fact remains - you are the one from Ramallah, according to your MO. So you have to lend a hand here, especially about red lines and the like. If you have friends (who can stay unemotional that is) bring 'em along. Well, for background, you can always take a peek at the end of the last BB column (the anti-german). The history goes back of course much further. He dissects well as you'll see (though yours truly is no slouch in that department, if I may say so myself). Off now to find the head of my history department (that's Tosefta).

  • 121. 0 0
    Re: #105, Joe
    • TC
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:16

    According to Joe, Masada is a "myth", in Israel there's "NOT MUCH OF JEWISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE" and "Jewish history and archaeological evidence found in China surpasses anything found in Palestine." So the entire archaeological and historical establishment must be conducting a lengthy and elaborate hoax, or maybe the Chinese emporer Cheng Di built that fortress on Masada to protect himself during the great Chino-Roman War? Someone needs to catch up on his archaeology indeed.

  • 120. 0 0
    #114 Ari ben Yisrael
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:03

    "But where were the oldest & MOST ancient Jewish Artifacts discovered????" It wasn't hard to find(with google of course) the answer: "Ben Ezra synagogue in Coptic Cairo is considered the oldest Jewish temple in the world dating to 606 BC". You can take your foot out of your mouth now. Does that mean you want to claim Egypt? In any case, your logic is flawed. A case for ownership or claim of something is best made by claiming it was in your possession LAST- MOST RECENT, not that your ancestors owned it 4,000 years ago and now you want to claim it. What court will allow that argument? " BTW Joe were you named after Yosef!!!" So now you want to lay claim my name too? What's next, humus is a Jewish dish? You guys are too funny. First of all, I embrace the rich history of my country, Jewish, Muslim and Christian and others. It's all good and should be cherished not distorted for political agenda. I don't care who did what 2,000 years ago.

  • 119. 0 0
    104# Yael G. It is not the land,you stupid.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 08.05.07
    • 12:00

    Yael G. The question is NOT who owes the land. The question who is making a bogus claim for his ownership of the land.On the broder picture Israel never denies the Palestinians their right. The Palestinians in their own foolish way, they denies all rights for the Jews and keep again foolishly warn that they will throw the Jews to the sea,those who can swim and those who can't swim. This is the problem 104-YaelG.Any solution,contribution,correction, direction. As you may well know it is a problems of open and shut doors; going on for generation after generation; the more getting older the more giving birth to new problems. It could be a psychological problem by now !

  • 118. 0 0
    glen
    • chanah
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:57

    well my guess the israelis will do what they have always done hand it over to the muslims

  • 117. 0 0
    moshe
    • chanah
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:51

    yes I guess so and I just hope his hands are still clean

  • 116. 0 0
    RAMALLAH JOE#90, 105,There are Arab artifacts all over Arabia.
    • PETER SM
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:36

    Where Arabs come from. Not to mention Europe where the Arab/Moslem colonialist invaders ruled till the Europeans threw them out.

  • 115. 0 0
    #105 Laila
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:19

    "you are wrong. You will find a lot of Jewish ruins in Israel. Starting from Masada, ruins of Gamle on Golan Heights where Jews fought the Romans, synagogue on Golan and Galilee. Also the Temple Mount" I'm sorry to inform you, the masada and other myths you mentioned where debunked by top Israeli archaelogists. It's in the book" The Bible Unearth" written by Israel Finkelstein and some other guy that I can't recall right now. I don't deny Jewish history in this region but my point was Jewish artifacts outside of "Israel" are a thousand times more in abundance than they are here. Europe and Russia have more Synagogues buried there than you will ever find here. Jewish symbols, art, sculptor or any other artifacts are easily found worldwide but in Israel, NOT MUCH OF JEWISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE despite tireless search. Don't take my word for it, read up on it. Jewish history and archaeological evidence found in China surpasses anything found in Palestine. http://www.joyfulnoise.net/tours/china2.html

  • 114. 0 0
    #90 Ramallah Joe on Jewish Artifacts
    • Ari ben Yisrael
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:18

    Yes Joe & you'll find Jewish Artifacts in Manhattan too.... some even manufactured in China no doubt ;o) But where were the oldest & MOST ancient Jewish Artifacts discovered???? BTW Joe were you named after Yosef!!!

  • 113. 0 0
    # 105 laila
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:12

    "You will find a lot of Jewish ruins in Israel." So what? You will find a lot of Greek ruins in Asia Minor, does that mean the Greeks should move in and the Turks should move out? With yout 'ruinous' reasoning the map of the whole world must be reshuffled, and you better think about where to move - or does Montreal not belong to the Hurons, Algonquins and Irokese?

  • 112. 0 0
    72# correction.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:11

    May I make a correction to my post 72#. It was a very long time ago when I read Josephus laboriouse book "The Wars of the Jews", in a Penguin edition. I have noted on several postings that many contributers such as 90# 93# mentioned that Herods was not Jewish. On my post 72# I mentioned that Herold was Jewish. If I am wrong I apologize, as it was so long time ago; I could be wrong.

  • 111. 0 0
    Everyone knows Herod was a Moslem/Arab/Caananite /Phllisinian.
    • PETER SM
    • 08.05.07
    • 11:07

    Its true,so there infidel crusaders.

  • 110. 0 0
    102: Yael, read a bit wider
    • David Teich
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:59

    The article isn't the only source. There is a dispute as to whether Herod did or did not convert. As to the dream that finding Herod's tomb wouldn't have a political component, huh? Of course it's political, just as religion and history always have and as multiple posters show.

  • 109. 0 0
    # 3 dror
    • Axel
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:56

    "This find of Herod`s tomb and grave is just more proof that this is Israeli land and always has been Israeli Land." If we claim that all places where German kings and emperors are buried must be German, we would own half of Europe. And you Americans better look out if the grave of an Indian chief is dug up in Manhattan. Unbelievable how some people translate an archeological find into territorial claims - where else but in Israel would this be possible?

  • 108. 0 0
    #97 David Teich distortions.
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:43

    "No, my antisemitic, lying little puppy, Herod`s mother was a Nabatean, a local group centered on Petra. Where is "Petra"? That's Jordan and the last I heard Arabs live there. Who are the Nabateans? According to the source you made mention of:" The Nabataeans, Arabic (الأنباط) Al-Anbaat, were an ancient trading people of southern Jordan, Canaan and the northern part of Arabia" Duh! There is more:" Proper names on their inscriptions suggest that they were true Arabs who had come under Aramaic influence. Starcky identifies the Nabatu of southern Arabia as their ancestors". "As wikipedia points out, by the 1st Century CE, the were speaking Greek". Wrong! Wikipedia:"The language of the Nabataean inscriptions, attested from the 2nd century BC, shows a local development of the Aramaic language. From the 4th century AD, the Arabic influence becomes overwhelming, in a way that it may be said the Nabataean language shifted seamlessly from Aramaic to Arabic." Get over it, his mother was ARAB!

  • 107. 0 0
    #4 One of those Jewish oddnesses
    • Knave Dave
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:34

    #4 writes "According to the evangelists Jesus of Nazareth was born when Herod was king. Since Herod died 4 or 5 years before Christian Era, something is odd.... At school we learned: "Jesus was born between 7 and 4 years before Christ" with the usual grin of the teacher. What is so odd about calendars being off? It's not that Jesus was born before Christ. That's a silly Jewish stab at nothing. It is that Julian was slightly off on when he calculated the date of Jesus' birth. No surprise. People make mistakes all the time when calculating the timing of ancient events, even when they try their best.

  • 106. 0 0
    A King and his three stooges - modern parallels
    • Kate
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:33

    King Herod was a great King. People loved or hated him, true, but he kept tight control of the nation. What he didn't do was to groom a new King to take his place. So when Herod died, Judea was left to his three sons (aka - the 3 stooges). They were incompetant and unruly. They simply couldn't get the job done. One, Archalaeus was, in fact, such a failure (not to mention quite mad - in the British sense), that the Romans intervened. They invited him to tea in Rome one day and didn't let him return. Ariel Sharon was a great leader. People either loved or hated him, true, but he kept tight control of the nation. What he didn't do was to groom a new leader to take his place. So when Ariel Sharon fell into a coma, Israel was left to the 3 stooges: Olmert, Peretz and Livni. ...oh where are the Romans when you need them!

  • 105. 0 0
    #90 You will Find a lot of Jewish ruins in Israel
    • Laila
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:31

    #90 you are wrong. You will find a lot of Jewish ruins in Israel. Starting from Masada, ruins of Gamle on Golan Heights where Jews fought the Romans, synagogue on Golan and Galilee. Also the Temple Mount where the Muslims built their mosque and are stopping excavation. AlsoDead Sea Scrolls. Etc etc etc.

  • 104. 0 0
    101: who owns the land
    • Yael G
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:29

    this argument of who was here firswt makes me sick. First of all, the Israelis own the land because they won it in a War of Independence, a defensive in which Israel fought against all of the Arab countries surrounding her. The UN first established two states and the Jews agreed with that while the Arabs rejected it and started a war. Many historians agree that many Palestinians moved out voluntarily (sometimes at the request of other Arab states) in order toreturn when the land would be conquered. Plus much of the land has been already sold to the Jews by the Palestinians as it was considered a useless swamp and dryland/dessert. No one cared much for the land before the Jews, the representatives of the West came into the area. Since then the Palestinians have been an unfortunate paw in the war against the Western influence in the region and the Jews, of course. Have any Arab states gave them citizenship?Only Jordan. That would legitimize Israel's existence.Look at facts use your brain

  • 103. 0 0
    #12 All Jews Hated Herod and he was not Jewish
    • Semsem
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:25

    #12: All Jews hated Herod and he was not even Jewish.

  • 102. 0 0
    #98 - read carefully. Alissa=knowledge, Herod-hero? NOT the point
    • Yael G
    • 08.05.07
    • 10:19

    1. David Teich - instead of being sarcastic - reread the article. Herod's FATHER and GRANDFATHER converted. He was not Jewish. To gain legitimacy among the Jews, he married Miriam from a well-known Jewish family. 2. Herod was a despot. No one could argue about that. But he was also of a huge importance to the Jewish people because of the things that he built (the Temple, Massada, Herodium and other). The article DOES not claim he was an angel or a hero - it describes the exciting discovery after over 45 years of digs. NOR does it try to be political and legitimize the Jewish existence in Israel. The argument about who was there first is ridiculous in presence of all the evidence already; Israel has vast archeological digs to recover her history and not to justify our existence. But apparently, the arabs are still afraid (look at the Temple Mount squarrel). Anyway, I will stop being political here and advise you to do the same.

  • 101. 0 0
    84# Hannry D. Your inversion, right by logic wrong by fact.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:50

    Harry D. Your inversion could be right by logic but wrong by facts. Who ever owes this land it can't be the Palestinians. Herods tomb can prove that the Jews are the most descendant nation still living who owed that land. If any other nation like you said like the Native Americans or the Aboriginals Australian are here with their claim on this land, their claim can be verified. The only legal claimants for this land at the present are the Jews and certainly NOT THE PALESTINIANS. ------ Jewish History is the most documented of any other nation on earth. An asset, the Jews must use. The Jews are the first and only nation adopted this Land as a National Home and not a passers' bye occupiers. All the rest are false claimants. Israel must use its Historic Asset. We are living in a world of law and rationality and not a world of bogus claims !

  • 100. 0 0
    to #4 - Odd christians
    • William
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:50

    Jesus was born around year 7 BCE and Herod died around 4-5 BCE, which means Jesus was born while Herod was King of Jews. I cannot see the contradiction, i can only see your jewish sarcasm towards Christianism, which is pathetic just as you are.. now you re gonna ask how come Jesus is born before Christ Era since Jesus is the Christ.

  • 99. 0 0
    Pals must acknowledge Jewish right to share the land
    • Jason
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:46

    There are ancient monuments, actual facts on the ground, that testify to a very long Jewish presence in Israel. Few nations can claim such a historical timeline, and Hollywood writers couldn't write a more interesting script. So how can Hamas possibly justify not sharing this land? Their demand for all of Israel is such a gross offense that it practically defies the laws of nature, and certainly the laws of man. I wonder how our ancient Kings would have dealt with Hamas? King Herod probably would have been more effective than PM Olmert. But, these are more civilized times, right?

  • 98. 0 0
    93: Why Alissa? Because he didn't wear Ashkenzi clothing?
    • David Teich
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:33

    Believe it or not, your mother being Jewish isn't the only way to be Jewish. There's a weird little thing called "conversion". It's said that both his father and he did so. That it wasn't done by a rabbi steeped in the 18th Century shtetl mentality isn't a surprise, given he lived long before that. I suggest you study, conversion's been with Judaism a very long time.

  • 97. 0 0
    90: Joe's Arab revisionism
    • David Teich
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:21

    No, my antisemitic, lying little puppy, Herod's mother was a Nabatean, a local group centered on Petra. While their territory did spread to Northern Arabia, they were not the same as the barbaric Arabian tribes further down the desert. As wikipedia points out, by the 1st Century CE, the were speaking Greek. They were completely distinct from the Arabs who conquered them via jihad centuries later. "Palestine". Really? Hmmm, Judea was a province in the Roman Empire that was renamed Palestine because we wouldn't keep fighting for our independence -- long before there was an Arab presence here. And you know that if you can admit the truth.

  • 96. 0 0
    Herod - not a hero [end]
    • English Resident
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:16

  • 95. 0 0
    35# sean. My warning is true.
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:03

    "through out history Jews have been killed and perscuted many,many times.."sean.You are right. But ask yourself,where are those who killed & perscuted the Jews many,may times ?None of them left..All of them ends horribly.Hitler,Stalin; of late.In our time,sorry to tell you,some Arabs who can not be true believers. Look at them,living on hand outs;& Beggers. Ahmadienjed ? Nassraleh? Wait and see.. I am not inventing facts.It is all recorded History. It seems from your post,you are well educated. To ignore your knowledge;it is your problem,sean. One final word, those who believe in G-d, needs to believe in Him no matter if they like the truth or not.But,those who don't believe in G-d are of no concern of mine..I don't know which side you are sean..but I know what side myself. As for Bin Laden he hates the world not only Jews.I hate nobody but I believe in G-d and History is the true face of G-d.Search History sean and you will see I am right.My warning is True..

  • 94. 0 0
    The edomites built in the Negev too
    • Alissa
    • 08.05.07
    • 09:01

  • 93. 0 0
  • 92. 0 0
    "Herods Tomb" &to #29,20,36
    • Gary Pineda
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:57

    What a awesome find,Josephus was a good historian,time and time again his writings have been proven,the new testament authors are much later well paast 100 CE,BCE and CE stand for "Before Common Era"& "Common Era",the Romans were a few years off on the birth of a man some beleived was the messiah,mostlty because of not including leap years into the equation,so possibly 4 years off,so the year right now is most likely 2011 CE. approx,placing Herods death at 4BCE very close, the Jews go by a totally different calc on time mainly lunar,the year is 5767,no BCE or anything else,but back to creation of man,Adam hmm??

  • 91. 0 0
    'Voice of Reason', Herod was born a Jew; his ancestors converted
    • Jake
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:56

    No matter what Herod's motives may have been, and he was a tyrant, he scrupulously identified himself as a Jew, and will go down in history as rebuilding the 2nd Temple and making Judaea a major world player. If he cannot be considered a Jew, than no one can be considered an American except Sitting Bull. ((And the last thing he would have called himself is American!)

  • 90. 0 0
    Herod was half Arab and half Jew
    • Joe
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:49

    Technically, he was not a Jew since his mother was Arab but who cares about such details. I find it amusing how people are quick to politicize this discovery of his tomb, assuming it's true and can be validated by other archaelogists, not sure how a tomb of a genocidal baby killer millenia ago is relevant to the conflict today. Herod was installed by Rome as "King of Judea" and it was the Roman army that defeated Antigonus, the Macedonian king who at the time had Palestine part of his kingdom(he inherited the remains of Alexander the Great conquests after he died) and so how this connects to events in 2007 is beyond me. This is why I see no hope for this region when people start pointing to artifacts or books dating back 4,000 y.o to justify events happening today. Maybe it's just me but I find that kind of thinking incredibly odd and bizarre. It's no secret, we all know Jews existed in just about every corner of earth since time immemorial. You will find more Jewish artifacts in Spain, East Europe, Kazaria, India and many other places than you will find here in Palestine. You know it's true.

  • 89. 0 0
    Was Herod really Jewish?
    • RedStarYeast
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:47

    Haven't read Josephus in years. Am I mistaken, or weren't Herod & crew a bunch of converted, Hellenized Samaritans?

  • 88. 0 0
    Not-too-exemplary history
    • Negru Vods
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:41

    Before getting too puffed up over this discovery, consider the unsavory character of Herod and his dynasty, an undistinguished bunch of Levantine potentates propped up by their Roman masters and best known for extravagance, cruelty, treachery, fratricide, parricide and incest. Read Flavius Josephus for a bit of insight into this fascinating family!

  • 87. 0 0
    LF, Edwin, jealous?
    • Jake
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:37

    Who is gloating, LF? King Herod regarded himself as a Jew and was considered as such by his peers. The proof? Only a Jew would be allowed to oversee the rebuilding of the temple. You also forgot that the Edomites were a tribe closely related to Israelites, who were themselves a composite of absorbed tribes included the once-hated Canaanites (whose language they co-opted.) If Herod is not a Jew, then Queen Victoria was not British and Tariq Ben Zayad was not an Arab and Sarkozy is not French! Besides, Herod produced Jewish heirs from the royal Hashmonean line. As for Edwin denying Jesus' Jewishness, that seems to be in line with the new fashion started by Arafat which insists Jesus was a Palestinian Jihadi. Get real.The New Testament goes to great lengths to establish Jesus' pedigree from King David, and mentions Mary's Levite heritage. And the Idumeans did not live anywhere near the Galilee. They were from the South.

  • 86. 0 0
    43. re: Who Is Right
    • Larry
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:28

    Well said Pam!

  • 85. 0 0
    Remember Herod was really an arab converted to hebrew religion
    • Voice of Reason
    • 08.05.07
    • 08:14

    All sorts of ironies arise when anyone tries to draw comparisons between Herod's time and the present. Herod was racially an arab whose Idumean ancestors accepted the hebrew religion, although the Idumeans were not fully accepted as such by many of the more conservative hebrew religious authorities. Nonetheless, it was very convenient for Herod to claim to be a hebrew after he had managed to defeat the last of the (truly hebrew) Hasmonean dynasty with the help of Mark Anthony who confirmed him as the Roman client king over judea. If we want to project to the modern era, it would be like a palestinian leader converting to judaism in order to be installed as leader of a one-state israel/palestine by an American hegemon, just as Mark Anthony did for Herod some 2000 years ago.

  • 84. 0 0
    Pam...Not So Fast
    • Harry D
    • 08.05.07
    • 07:59

    "All evidence (both archaelogical and written history) points to the Jewish people being the first to inhabit, and therefore the ones who have the most right to claim, this area, and those surrounding it". Pam, the history of the region does not begin with Herod. To suggest that the archaelogical and written record points to the Jewish people as being the first to inhabit the area is nonsense. While there is some suggestion that the "Habiru" mentioned in ancient artifacts were the precursors of the Hebrews, it is highly speculative. Even if the Habiru were the forerunners of the Hebrews, they were hardly "the first to inhabit" the region. If you forget the Bible and just look at the archaelogical record, Egypt would have the greatest land claim. But it is absurd to say that because a group "got there first", they have the right to the land...if true, let us return North America to its rightful owners, the Native American Nations, and Australia to the Aboriginals.

  • 83. 0 0
    kinishin.....lol
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 07:47

    what a funny story.ha!ha!ha!

  • 82. 0 0
    herod the great was an edomite....
    • maria
    • 08.05.07
    • 07:40

    like arafat...you know the amalekites[they were descendants to esau[edomite]...God commanded the israelites to utterly destroy them-kind king saul spared some.some edomites who wanted to kill hebrews were herod the great and his great,great grandpa haman.the palestinians are modern edomites/jordanians.the edomites built petra in jordan.

  • 81. 0 0
    Herod as a great ruler?!?!
    • Pam
    • 08.05.07
    • 07:21

    I believe the news article above clearly states the truth about Herod, if you read between the lines. All historical evidence points to the fact that he was a tyrannical ruler, who was vain, and selfish beyond imagining. This was a great historical find though! Congrats to those who did it! I can't wait to hear what was found in the tomb. Personally, I pray that there is more evidence buried with him. Afterall, someone as greedy as Herod would have wanted to try to take some of it with him, just as the Pharoahs of Egypt did.

  • 80. 0 0
    keep digging graves, we need many
    • arab
    • 08.05.07
    • 07:20

    not un expected fabrication

  • 79. 0 0
    Edwin
    • Pam
    • 08.05.07
    • 07:02

    Edwin, If you trace the lineage of Jesus through his mother Mary (his only earthly parent), then you will see that he comes from the priestly line of Aaron. That hardly equals a Samaritan or Idumean. As for Hislove of Samaritans, He also loved Tax Collectors (some of the most hated people of the day), lepers (definitely shunned), and women, who were seen as extremely inferior by their male counterparts. He did this, not as a sign of who he was, but what he stood for. Acceptance, and love my friend. He did this so that those whom He was teaching would know that salvation was to be granted to all humans, regardless of race, creed, religion, and/or sex. A fact which, unfortuantely, most of them ignored, and didn't understand, until the conversion of Saul Paulus.

  • 78. 0 0
    Messiah
    • David
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:57

    Check out Psalm 22, Isaiah 53 and see what they said about the Messiah. Jesus is the Messaih, the Christ of God. Read your Bibles, and with a true heart pray to God to show you the Messiah, only God will reveal the truth to you. Others are trying to keep the truth from you.

  • 77. 0 0
    BCE
    • Char
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:53

    I think it stands for Before the Common Era.

  • 76. 0 0
    Soon to be in Palestine
    • Steve
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:51

  • 75. 0 0
    BCE - #29
    • Ann
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:48

    BCE means Before the Christian Era. The journalist was actually more astute than most.

  • 74. 0 0
    re: For Amos
    • Pam
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:47

    Yes, but the calendar that we use today is one that was adopted, and implemented by Christians, so it would be accurate that the terms would read "Before Christ", and "Anno Domini". Also, these weren't years from when Christianity really began, but from the BIRTH of Jesus the Christ. Christianity didn't begin until after the Christ's death, and resurrection. I see your point, but I don't believe that the terms themselves imply that you believe in Christianity at all. Afterall, I say that I am a Sagitarrius, but I don't believe in astrological signs. In the same breath, I can't change those same signs just to suit what I, as a Christian, would find more "socially" acceptable.

  • 73. 0 0
    herods response
    • tim
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:45

    you'd think listening to all these religious descriptions of a hate and vengence filled god that its some kind of Tony Soprono sitting up in heaven whacking people at his bequest. your imaginary god needs a THERAPIST i think, if thats the case, tell him or her it to give me a call i have the number to a good one:)

  • 72. 0 0
    31# Lincoln.The land with so many Jewish past must be Jewish. .
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:44

    "I wonder.." Mark Lincoln. Ofcourse it is.. Josephus Flavius born 37 AD. I remember I asked you more than two months ago to search in his famous book 'The Wars of the Jews' regarding his brief mention of Jesus Christ. Josephus was like Herod of Jewish descent but in the service of the Romans. Like Herod hated by the Jews of his time and not recognised by the Jews of all time.

  • 71. 0 0
    re: Who Is Right
    • Pam
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:36

    All evidence (both archaelogical and written history) points to the Jewish people being the first to inhabit, and therefore the ones who have the most right to claim, this area, and those surrounding it. Arafat is nothing more than a "Johnny-Come-Lately"... an invader... terrorist... whatever you choose to call him. Just because his people invaded that land hundreds, or thousands of years ago, does not make them the rightful heirs to Jerusalem or any land associated with it. They will always try their best to come up with something to prove they were there first, and will always fall short, as shown to us by archaelogical evidence that continues to crop up everyday. I think it is really funny that all of the major finds over there do nothing but prove the Bible is a very strong historical book that bears closer scrutiny by anyone who really wants to know the truth.

  • 70. 0 0
    Herod
    • jb
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:34

    Proffesor Netzer, Congratulations and thanks again for dinner. we enjoyed the opportunity of a lifetime.

  • 69. 0 0
  • 68. 0 0
    Yosemite
    • Connie
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:14

    Your post gave me a good laugh...so true,so true.

  • 67. 0 0
    Good!
    • Eugene
    • 08.05.07
    • 06:08

    Good for The state of Israel and for the people of Israel!

  • 66. 0 0
    33LF Herod called himself a Jew, King Of Judea
    • Michigan
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:59

    And his grandson, the beloved, by Jews, Agrippas, was the last King of Judea. Yes, Herod was a cruel, paranoid ruler, but compared to Nero and Kaligula, the Roman rulers, he was almost a saint...

  • 65. 0 0
    #33
    • Edwin
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:57

    LF, it is interesting to note that there is some evidence to suggest that Jesus may likewise have been of Idumean extraction. Like Samaritans, Idumean conversions were not recognized as genuine, which would help explain Jesus being held in disdain by the Jerusalem Pharisees and his portrayal of Samaritans as being ?good?. Jesus? distinctive Galil Idumean robes would easily have betrayed his origins.

  • 64. 0 0
    King Herod's tomb
    • Eugenia
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:56

    Is it true?

  • 63. 0 0
    BC and AD??
    • Linda
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:56

    What ever happened to BC and AD? I am so sick of this PC stuff!!!

  • 62. 0 0
    to #32 akram
    • sean
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:55

    Through out history, Jews have been killed and persecuted many many times more than Palestinians in Gaza. By your logic, this means that the wrath of God is on the Jews not Palestinians in Gaza. While reading your statement, I thought I was listening to bin laden. You're a fanatic, a danger to peace.

  • 61. 0 0
    to #3 Kinishin
    • Sean
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:47

    you feel you're so smart...smarty pants. Palestinians were christians who were jews who were pagans. Jordanians were christians who were jews. Many Arabs who are now muslim used to be christian who before that were jews. Judiasim came before christianty and Islam, so it's natural that you will find jewish history before christian. Now the question is, does the ownership of the land stop at jews ? or with the people before them? Until you discover that Adam was a Jew, then I can gladly say that Jews own the whole earth. Muslims, Christians and Jews are all descendants of Abraham. It makes no sense who was there 1st. What makes sense is someone living in his house one day, then kicked out by force the 2nd. By that token, lets give back north America to the Indians, south America to the Asians, as matter of fact, lets give back the whole earth to Africans. Since humanity originated in Africa. At what point do we stop going back in time to decide ownership in a land?

  • 60. 0 0
    34 DON W. they don't have to make up any stories,Biblical or
    • sara
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:38

    otherwise.There many tribes mentioned in the OT and recent research confirms that.Any one or more of these tribes converted to islam in the 7th century.The Palestinians could be descended from any one of these tribes some of whom were more ancient than the Hebrews,mentioned in the OT. But we are in the 21st century.And Palestinian occupation of historic Palestine dates back in the modern period as far back as the 18th century,at which time there were only a small minority of jews among the Muslim and Christian majority.The Palestininian farmers cultivated the land,during the Ottoman period,while the Turkish absentee landlords held the legal rights. History is history.I hope Haaretz prints this.

  • 59. 0 0
    Grave Desecration
    • Marc
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:35

    Why hasn't anyone commented on the morality of digging up this man's grave? He should be allowed to rest in peace.

  • 58. 0 0
    Herod
    • Glen
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:32

    Now since they found it, what how they going to do with it.?

  • 57. 0 0
    Herod's tomb
    • Denise
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:29

    In one of Mary's visitations, she said that there would be more of more archaelogical finds which would reveal more of the truth. Combine this with the find yesterday of the cave atop Mt. Everest. The trust always comes to bear light!! What an exciting time to be in.

  • 56. 0 0
    Is this the same Herod...
    • Moshe
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:23

    Is this the same Herod that allowed the Pharisee's to send Jesus to the cross and then washed his hands of the whole affair?

  • 55. 0 0
    Herod's Grave Site
    • Don Williams
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:07

    Well, this should be fun. I can't wait to hear Hammas and the other enimies of the Jews try to explain this one away! They can't, of course, but I am sure they will do their best to make up some sickening lie as to why the tomb of Herod is actually a fake. The steps they take to mask the truth is, at the same time, both laughable, and yet, so sickening!

  • 54. 0 0
    Great find!
    • LF
    • 08.05.07
    • 05:00

    Kudos to the Hebrew University and Pr Netzer for this find! As for gloating of Herod being a jew, one needs to bear in mind, he was an idumean, who were forced to convert to Judaism under penalty of death, by Hycanus... hardly a jew by choice. (the real jews used to refer to these idumeans as "the convert of the lions"... They either converted, or were fed to the beasts) Just as a reminder, the idumeans took part in the sack of Jerusalem and the slaughter of the jews in the time of Nebuchadnezzar. Not really a jew-friendly people. As for Herod's mother, she was a nabatean from Petra, again, hardly a jew. There are too many examples of history being re-used and re-written for political purposes, the motives are never noble.

  • 53. 0 0
    17# Virgina. Great news. Allow me to add:
    • Akram Zekaria
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:54

    I fully agree with you.May I add the first lines of G-d to Yehoshua after the death of Moshe: "NOW AFTER THE DEATH OF MOSHE THE SERVANT OF THE LORD..THE LORD SPOKE TO YEHOSHUA THE SON OF NUN,MOSHE'S MINSTER,SAYING,MOSHE MY SERVANT IS DEAD NOW THEREFORE ARISE, GO OVER THE YARDEN THOU,AND ALL THIS PEOPLE,TO THE LAND WHICH I DO GIVE THEM TO THE CHILDREN OF YISRA'EL. EVERY PLACE THAT THE SOLE OF YOUR FOOT SHALL TREAD UPON,THAT HAVE I GIVEN TO YOU.AS I SAID TO MOSHE These are G-ds words said and written before Islam & Palestinians exist. Every inch of this land that Israeli's touch with SOLE OF THEIR FOOT is Israel. Those who are disputing the words of G-d will have the wrath of G-d on them, generation after generation as we see in Gaza now.Those who hate the Jews will have the Hate of G-d. Be warn ! G-d hate them for generation to come till the end of time.

  • 52. 0 0
    I wonder if there was any connection with Jewish scholar Flavius
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:50

    "I wonder if there was any connection with Jewish scholar Flavius and the Jewish writers of the "New Testament" at all. Something surely is amiss here, but who and why?" - Really Curious The same connection as with that really Jewish guy Jesus. Is it not odd how many Jews there were in Judea?

  • 51. 0 0
    For Amos....
    • Dov
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:39

    I always thought the initials signified Christian Era and Before the Christian Era. To me that is quite accurate and more culturally fair. The numbers of the years correspond to when the era of Christianity supposedly began. I don't like the use of Before Christ and AD because it assumes I believe that Jesus was the Messiah (Christos = Messiah) or a god (AD = Anno Domini - or "the year of my God")

  • 50. 0 0
    Herod's tomb discovered
    • abeernink
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:39

    BCE? CE? The historically correct indicators are "BC" and "AD," standing for "Before Christ" and "Anno Domini" ("The Year of our Lord"), respectively. One would think that a "studied" journalist would know this.

  • 49. 0 0
    Herod's Death
    • Mike
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:29

    I believe if you do your research you will find that Herod died in January of 1BC not the oft quoted 4BC. I realize it is not that important in the overall scheme of things but for those of us who really enjoy chronology it is an important event. Needless to say, finding Herod's tomb is another nail in the coffin to those who ridicule the Bible.

  • 48. 0 0
    #9 Amos
    • Jim
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:26

    Yes, Amos, you said it. But no one is trying to re-write history. Just want to make the study of history more secular. How about BW and AW (Before When and After When)? Acceptable?

  • 47. 0 0
    Melinda
    • Harry D
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:20

    "I bet the killing of innocent children and scibes and priests drove him crazy with demons in latter end". Maybe he just got into some really bad herring. (It happened to me).

  • 46. 0 0
    Tell us more!
    • Jim
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:15

    Congratulations to Hebrew University, to its Dept. of Archaeology, and especially to Professor Netzer for his hard work and dedication! Want to buy a camel's hair paint brush cheap?

  • 45. 0 0
    Revelation
    • Harry D
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:15

    I found the reason why there's so much strife in the Holy Land. It's Herodatary.

  • 44. 0 0
    Have They Discovered Arafat's Tomb Yet?
    • Yosemite
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:12

    You know, the Swiss one with Suha's money. I hear Haniyeh is building another right next to that one.

  • 43. 0 0
    Congratulations, Hebrew University!
    • Jeff Northridge
    • 08.05.07
    • 04:08

    That is a most interesting archeological discovery. I can't wait to see the documentary on the History International Channel. Israel had better put a 24-hour guard around the place or the tomb robbers and radical Muslims will swarm all over it and trash the site. I'll bet that Arafat (MHRIH) is turning over in his grave right now mumbling something like "Herod was a Palestinian" or something equally stupid.

  • 42. 0 0
    # 22 Mark
    • Jim
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:58

    So King Herod was part Edomite. So King David was part Moabite. So it doesn't bother HAT posters. So great.

  • 41. 0 0
    lets not forget what Herod did in Bethlehem and
    • true believer
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:56

    why. He killed all the boys under two years old because he was afraid of the real "King of the Jews" who was born there, the descendent of David, Jesus. One of the greatest modern discoveries of Jewish ancestry in the Holy Land also relates to the opening pages of the birth of it's Messiah. Jesus and His family fled to Egypt when Herod sought to kill Him in Bethleham which Matthew said fulfilled Jeremiah's prophecy of "Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted for they were not." Powerful prophecy and devastating fulfillment in the Gospel of Matthew.

  • 40. 0 0
    The Big Question
    • Sven
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:55

    Is the tomb and grave intact!?

  • 39. 0 0
    I'm wondering the same as #4
    • D
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:51

    Christianity oddness.

  • 38. 0 0
    Michigan
    • Gina
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:51

    Easily solved. King Herod must have been a Muslim.

  • 37. 0 0
    Arabs-Muslims-Herod's Tomb
    • Yisrael4Ever
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:46

    Arabs and Muslims Now you know that Holy Land belongs to Children of Yisrael. If you still do not believe the read quran: Surah 5.19-21 = Your allah has ordained Holy Land for Children of Yisrael. Surah 17.104 = Your allah is bringing back Children of Yisrael back to Holy Land. Surah 2.145 = You are even forbidden to think about Yerushalem. You cannot follow Yehudim Qibla.

  • 36. 0 0
    to # 3 a great one lol
    • Simon Mohammed
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:45

    you make me sincerly laugh. Thank you

  • 35. 0 0
    Jake
    • Gina
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:43

    Thanks for the additional information. Fascinating!

  • 34. 0 0
    16 Chick Corea the reverse is probably true,since Israel
    • Alan
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:34

    Israel has recently been digging under the Dome of the Rock, in an attempt to erase Muslim history.We also heard that a historic building which was used as the Supreme Muslim Council was demolished. And ofcourse, during the Nabka, it was not just the Palestinian villages that were destroyed but records and documents.Both Christian and Muslim places of worship feel threatened by Israel's actions. History in fact favours the Muslims because many of their ancestors were tribes whom Herod attempted to destroy,notably the bedouin.These are both pastoral and agriculturalists,and their descendants still live in Israel.In the last 5 months Israel destroyed their dwellings 5 times and each time they returned. Many of the ancient tribes and peoples such as the Philistines(mentioned in the OT) converted to Islam in the 7th century,and so did some Jews. After 688 A.D.(the building of the Dome of the Rock) Islam became the dominant power in Palestine(land of the Philistines,so named by the Romans

  • 33. 0 0
    Re: One of these christian oddnesses
    • ts
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:24

    Herod's son was also referred to as Herod. The Herod whose tomb was discovered was "Herod the Great."

  • 32. 0 0
    HEROD was a Roman satrap appointed by Marc Antony
    • sara
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:17

    He was of mixed ethnic descent qnd converted to Judaism.This may explain his tolerance of non Jewish peoples in his kingdom.he had at least 5 wives from a variety of tribes. His power was upheld by Rome,although he was quite ruthless on his own, and even eliminated some of his own children.This may have contributed to the story of his slaughter of children,just prior to the birth of Jesus.

  • 31. 0 0
    the use of BCE and CE
    • Dennis Cambly
    • 08.05.07
    • 03:05

    Hello Everyone: I have seen these terms used a million times. What do they mean? From what I remember the western calendar was developed by the Romans prior to Julius IV, however, I thought that the Jewish calendar was quite different. I am puzzled, not that it is new for me to be so :) I apologize for being away as I finally got back to work. Love to Everyone. Dennis

  • 30. 0 0
    odnesses
    • David
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:57

    Hi Christoph, It is easy to confuse Herod the Great with his descendent we hear more about in the New Testament; Herod Antipas, as I recall

  • 29. 0 0
    Chick Corea #16
    • Danite
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:57

    That was very well said and oh so true.The lack of respect and decency the Muslims show others makes a mockery of all big human rights talk, which is just a weapon to extraxt concessions for others in order to empower them to deny the same rights to those under their power.Regards

  • 28. 0 0
    to: Amos re BCE/CE vs BC/AD
    • LinkMan
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:47

    I don't object so much to "BC." It's "AD" that us non-Christians object to, because it doesn't mean "After Christ," but "Anno Domini" or "Year of Our Lord." Since Jesus isn't my Lord, I object to saying that I live in the 2007th year of Jesus's lordship.

  • 27. 0 0
    # 9 - Amos
    • michael
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:45

    Get over yourself. There are 1 billion Christians and 13 million Jews.

  • 26. 0 0
    Herod's tomb
    • Marilyn
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:25

    This is awesome. I can not wait to hear, read and see more. Congratulations. It proves that events and people were real in biblical times and not just stories.

  • 25. 0 0
    No mention of Jesus; not surpised
    • detroit
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:21

  • 24. 0 0
    Re:12
    • Paul Gene Tweed
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:20

    Re:#12-Post #2 wasn't mine.

  • 23. 0 0
    British Academics
    • Peter
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:19

    I advice the israeli academics going to the U.K. to defend the Israel position in the M.E. not to do that, and expend time analyzing the new discovery, while suspending meetings with the British academics by no providing access to this findings.

  • 22. 0 0
    Re: Finally, A Candidate!
    • Mark
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:17

    I doesn't seem to both anyone posting comments here that Herod wasn't, you know, Jewish (at least not in a way that most Israelis would accept today).

  • 21. 0 0
    Journalists Without Restraint
    • PalliesRock
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:05

    It's too bad a journalist wants to get a scoop on the hard work of the researching team at the University. Why not show a little deference to the people who were so involved in the project, and who planned on releasing the information at a special news conference?

  • 20. 0 0
    I wonder if there was any connection with Jewish scholar Flavius
    • Really Curious
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:04

    and the Jewish writers of the "New Testament" at all. Something surely is amiss here, but who and why?

  • 19. 0 0
    Awesome!
    • Gina
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:02

    Thanks for posting!

  • 18. 0 0
    Woh I was just reading a book about him today it said
    • Melinda Lehan
    • 08.05.07
    • 02:02

    how he took control of Israel he was Idumeankilled off a lot of the Pharisees and put in charge whom he wanted except for an old rabbi who bravely stood up to him years before. Stole a lot of land pocketed for hisself, he built up diff. palaces w/ Roman baths gardens etc. What got me in the bible he killed off babys 2 and under in fear of messiah then and it said Josephus said of his death he went insane and eat up with bad illness. I bet the killing of innocent children and scibes and priests drove him crazy with demons in latter end. Its true vengance does belong to the Lord

  • 17. 0 0
    WOW, sure glad this land is part of Israel.
    • Virginia
    • 08.05.07
    • 01:43

    This truly is an incredible find. Cannot wait to see the Documentary and/or hear more about it!

  • 16. 0 0
    This will probably encourage the Wafq
    • Chick Corea
    • 08.05.07
    • 01:31

    to quicken the speed and volume of their diggings and destroy Jewish artifacts by pulverizing them on the spot rather than simply dumping them as they are used to doing. History is the enemy of palestinians and they know it better that anyone.

  • 15. 0 0
    Herod REBUILT, not just expanded, 2nd temple
    • Jake
    • 08.05.07
    • 01:20

    Though officially Herod's Temple is recognized in Judaism as being a continuation of the 2nd temple, because animal sacrifices continued during the construction process, the old structure had to be torn down completely. Hence, Herod's Temple was a completely new construction and was so magnificent as to be considered on par with the 7 wonders of the world. It should also not be forgotten that though Herod was of Judaized Edomite ancestry (i.e. considered descendants of Jacob's brother Esau), Herod married into the royal Levite Hashmonean dynasty. As a result, from his marriage to Mariamne, his successors Agrippas I and II were both Herodians and descendants of the original Hashmonean dynasty.

  • 14. 0 0
    Herod must have been a Palestinian King...Or did not exist
    • Michigan
    • 08.05.07
    • 01:08

    After all, according to Arafat there was no Herodian Temple in Jerusalem. Congrats Ehud!!! and best to Dvora!

  • 13. 0 0
    #2 Paul Gene Tweed
    • Chris Linthwaite
    • 08.05.07
    • 01:04

    Lets not forget BP which stands for Before Present which is used now because of modern dating techniques. Fascinating find though, can't wait to hear more

  • 12. 0 0
    Herod the blood thirsty king
    • fady egypt
    • 08.05.07
    • 00:59

    if i was living during this king era i would hope to kill this beast after subjecting him to all kinds of hurts and violence i hope he is in hell now with the all of his examples may god takes revenge from him iam hating this man

  • 11. 0 0
    Herod's tomb and grave found at Herodium
    • Israel 4ever
    • 08.05.07
    • 00:45

    Excellent dig! History uncovered by the real owners of this land, and not by a false state. Secrets which could only be discovered by the doctrine, and support of Israel's centralized government, and educational infrastructure. Israel now and forever.

  • 10. 0 0
    King Herod's Tomb
    • Paul Gene Tweed
    • 08.05.07
    • 00:06

    Congrats Ehud and Hebrew University on your discovery of King Herod's Tomb!

  • 9. 0 0
    I am always amused by the use of BCE and CE
    • Amos
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:49

    uuhhh who decided when the common era was to begin? The Catholic church, at it was based on the birth of Christ...although they were off a few years...but its silly, as if it was arbitrarily made up...BEFORE CHRIST (BC) ...AFTER CHRIST! (AD) Lets not try to recreate history...its silly, we are using the western (european) calendar...and it was created by the church...lets not deny that and move on. THERE I SAID IT! :)

  • 8. 0 0
  • 7. 0 0
    Finally, A Candidate!
    • Dyinglikeflies
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:21

    Herod might be our closest shot at having a real leader in Israel. Glad we found him. Oh, I know he's dead, but if you look past that he's got more charisma than the current crop, and probably a more active mind.

  • 6. 0 0
    Who is right?
    • Chick Corea
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:21

    The Jews who made this discovery or arafat's about-to-be-released-post-humous autobiography in which camel face claims that exactly on this same spot and before well Herod was the birthplace and home of his great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great uncle whose house key can be found in a Ramallah safe deposit box at this very moment. Looks like it is a draw.

  • 5. 0 0
    Olmert's Response to the Discovery of Herod's Tomb
    • Richter
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:21

    I think this is a timely reminder for all of us that there are people who ran this place even worse than I have.

  • 4. 0 0
    One of these christian oddnesses
    • christoph
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:20

    "Based on the writings of Jewish scholar Flavius Josephus, Herod died in 4 or 5 BCE." According to the evangelists Jesus of Nazareth was born when Herod was king. Since Herod died 4 or 5 years before Christian Era, something is odd with the calculation. At school we learned: "Jesus was born between 7 and 4 years before Christ" with the usual grin of the teacher.

  • 3. 0 0
    Wow guess that story told at the UN is true
    • Kinishin
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:13

    Years ago at the UN the Israeli Diplomat got up to speak. He started with before I start I want to tell the good folks sitting here today a story he then said, when Moses was leading the Israeli's out of Eygpt he came upon a small river and decided to go in to wash up. When he was done as he came out of the river he noticed his clothes were gone. He went to the people and told his story and they started to yell it must be the Palestinians. At that point in the story the Arab diplomats stood up and started yelling there were no Palestinians then. The Israeli diplomat said thats right now I will talk to all of you about why I came to the UN to speak today. This find of Herod's tomb and grave is just more proof that this is Israeli land and always has been Israeli Land.

  • 2. 0 0
    INCREDIBLE FIND
    • Dror
    • 07.05.07
    • 23:11

    I visited the Herodium not too long ago. Two reserve soldiers joined me after I gave them a ride up to the entrance of the site from their base. We had the whole place to ourselves. We talked about Herod allot, go figure that he was there right beneath our feet, amazing.

  • 1. 0 0
    Herod found in a grave situation
    • MichaelF
    • 07.05.07
    • 22:55

    Ha! Ha!