• Published 00:00 28.03.07
  • Latest update 00:00 28.03.07

Arab states unanimously approve Saudi peace initiative

Saudi king calls for end to international blockade on Palestinians; EU urges Arab states to be flexible on plan.

By Avi Issacharoff and Agencies

Arab leaders gathering for a two-day summit in Saudi Arabia unanimously approved Wednesday the Saudi peace initiative originally launched in 2002.

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas voted in favor of the initiative, although Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas abstained in the vote.

The plan offers Israel recognition and permanent peace with all Arab countries in return for Israeli withdrawal from lands captured in the 1967 Six Day War. It also calls for setting up a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital and a just solution to the issue of Palestinian refugees.

Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah called at the summit for an end to the international blockade on the Palestinian government and to revive efforts to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Addressing the Arab League, the king said "It has become necessary to end the unjust blockade imposed on the Palestinian people as soon as possible so that the peace process can move in an atmosphere far from oppression and force."

Saudi Arabia last month brokered a unity government of Abbas' Fatah faction and Hamas, hoping it would help end a crippling Western blockade imposed after the Islamist group took office more than a year ago.

Israel and the United States have urged countries to cut political and financial support for the Palestinians because Hamas, which leads the government, refuses to recognize Israel, renounce violence and accept existing peace deals.

The European Union's foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, urged Arab states Wednesday to be flexible in their land-for-peace offer to Israel, warning that without a solution to the conflict, the Middle East is at risk of missing the train of human and economic development.

Addressing the Arab summit in the Saudi Arabian capital of Riyadh, Solana called for an Israeli withdrawal to the pre-1967 boundary - a key demand in an Arab peace plan that the two-day gathering intends to relaunch.

But he called the Arab initiative a general concept that has to be developed. He urged the Arabs and Israel to deal with the plan as a starting point in negotiations rather than a take-it-or-leave-it proposal.

"The important thing is to get the negotiations started. In any negotiations there are changes in positions, because negotiations are like that," Solana told reporters on the sidelines of the summit.

Solana said he expected two or three working groups to be formed to make the initiative more operational in order to move the process forward.

In a written message to the Arab leaders gathered in Riyadh, Solana said the EU hopes all the members of the Arab League will fulfill their responsibilities and contribute to the success of this enterprise.

"Failure to rise to today's challenges will put the Middle East risk of missing the train of human and economic development," he said in the message.

Before arriving in Riyadh, Solana expressed optimism that the relaunched initiative could reinvigorate the Middle East peace process.

Solana's presence at the Arab League summit was designed to highlight the European Union's support for the peace initiative, officials said. It will also demonstrate the bloc's backing for Saudi Arabia's efforts to resolve a number of regional crises, including the political impasse in Lebanon and efforts to bring Iran's nuclear program under international supervision.

Saudis: Rejection of Arab plan is rejection of peaceIf Israel rejects the Arab peace initiative, it means it is not interested in reaching a peaceful solution with its neighbors, Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal said Wednesday.

Speaking at the Riyadh summit, al-Faisal said, "If Israel refuses, that means it doesn't want peace. Then [the conflict] goes back into the hands of the lords of war."

Haniyeh urged Arab leaders meeting in Riyadh not to compromise on the Palestinian refugees' right to return to their homes in Israel, a clause in the initiative which Israel has asked to modify.

Haniyeh told Reuters in an interview that his group would not oppose an Arab peace initiative which the summit is expected to relaunch, but would not give in on the Palestinian refugees' right of return.

"What concerns me more than anything else ... is not to compromise on the fundamental Palestinian rights, foremost being the right of return," Haniyeh said shortly before the summit opened.

"I expect the Arab summit meeting in Riyadh to reiterate the Arab countries' commitment not to compromise in any way on the Palestinian refugees right of return under any circumstances," Haniyeh said.

At the summit, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Arab leaders to prove they were serious about peace with Israel by reviving their five-year-old initiative.

"The Arab peace initiative is one of the pillars for the peace process .... This initiative sends a signal that the Arabs are serious about achieving peace," Ban told Arab leaders, according to an Arabic translation.

"When I was in Israel I urged my Israeli friends to take a new look at the initiative. Here in Riyadh, I also urge you, my Arab friends, to benefit from this initiative and reiterate your commitment to it because the situation is dangerous."

At the summit, Arab League chief Amr Moussa urged Israel to accept the initiative rather than ask for changes.

"The Israelis response was to ask for an amendment. We tell them to accept it first," Moussa told Arab leaders at a summit in Saudi Arabia.

"We are at a crossroads, it is either we move towards a real peace or see an escalation in the situation."

Hamas adopts ambiguity policy on Arab peace planIn discussions with Haaretz Tuesday, a number of leading Hamas figures in the Gaza Strip said the group would refrain from expressing its views on the Arab peace initiative that members of the Arab League, including the Palestinian Authority, are expected to support during the summit in Riyadh.

The figures said the organization woulf adopt a policy of ambiguity on its stance vis-a-vis the peace initiative. However, senior Hamas officials admitted that they are opposed to parts of the initiative relating to a peace agreement with Israel or its recognition.

Palestinian sources said Tuesday that Hamas political bureau chief Khaled Meshal has promised Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah not to disrupt the decisions of the summit.

The same sources said that the policy of ambiguity stems from concerns that open opposition to the initiative, which is a revived version of the Saudi initiative approved at the 2002 Arab League summit in Beirut, will cause friction between Hamas and the Saudis. The initiative offers Israel normalization of relations with the Arab world in exchange for a full withdrawal to 1967 lines and a negotiated settlement to the Palestinian refugee problem.

Israel and the United States have not rejected the initiative but expressed reservations on such Israeli red line issues as the refugees problem. When asked whether Hamas will accept the initiative, senior officials in the group said they reject some of its principles.

The spokesman for Hamas in the Palestinian parliament, Salah al-Bardawil, told Haaretz, "we will not agree to recognition of Israel or peace with it [as it appears in the initiative]. We have no problem with the part of the initiative that calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders and the right of refugees to return."

Bardawil told Haaretz that Meshal had promised to Saudi King Adbullah that Hamas will work with the Arab consensus view, but "we cannot recognize Israel or agree to peace and normalization."

Meshal called on Arab leaders participating in the summit not to make concessions on refugees and the Palestinians' right to defend themselves, according to Saudi media.

"Meshal called on Arab leaders meeting in Riyadh to adopt a strategy based on the right to self-defense," the official Saudi news agency SPA said. "He said that conceding legitimate rights such as the right of return and the Palestinian people's right to protection was unacceptable," the report added.

Meshal spoke to SPA in Algeria, after a visit to Saudi Arabia for talks with officials there on Sunday.

Taking a more severe position, Ismail Radwan, a Hamas spokesman in the Gaza Strip, declared Tuesday that "the Hamas positions have not changed in any way. The new government has accepted commitments but our positions remain unchanged."

Another Hamas spokesman in Gaza, Fawzi Barhum, told Haaretz that "the issue is not a 'yes' or 'no' by Hamas regarding the initiative. We respect the Arab efforts to attain Palestinian rights and we will act within the Arab consensus. Nonetheless, the Zionist enemy continues to reject the initiative and we will not determine our position in reference to it before it has been accepted."

Meanwhile, Abbas is expected to announce the Palestinian Authority's support for the initiative. Haniyeh is not expected to present the unity government's views on the initiative.

Abbas: Arab plan offers Israel chance to live in 'sea of peace'The Arab peace plan could be Israel's last chance to live in a "sea of peace" and should not be squandered, Abbas said on Tuesday.

"This initiative simply says to Israel 'leave the occupied territories and you will live in a sea of peace that begins in Nouakchott and ends in Indonesia'," he said, referring to the Mauritanian capital in West Africa and the southeast Asian country that is the world's most populous Muslim country.

Related articles

  • FM: Israel agrees to talk terms of Palestinian state
  • PA: Arabs should call on Israel to accept Saudi plan unchanged

    Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah, Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak, Iraq's President Jalal Talabani and Qatar's Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani talk at the opening ceremony of the Arab summit in Riyadh on Wed. (Reuters)

    • Print Page
    • Send to a friend
    • Share
    • Text Size +|-
     
     
    TalkBacks

    Why Facebook Connect?

    Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

    Add a comment

    Add your reply

    • 692. 0 0
      Kevin from Baltimore claims
      • Jackie
      • 06.05.09
      • 17:35

      That descendents of German Jews killed by the Nazis have the right to return to their ancestral homes. Not so. When I went to Austria and visited the home where my cousins had lived, I was told that Jews never lived there. Polish Jews trying to return to their homes immediately after the war were killed. Even as recently as 1980s, descendents of Polish Jews were told that Jews had never lived in the towns that their families came from and the town records documenting their families ownership of the lands had been destroyed.

    • 691. 0 0
      # 55 Lynn Hamas doesn't want peace they want Israel.
      • petra
      • 06.05.09
      • 15:38

      you can't be more right!! Exactly as you've stated. Hamas and Fatah are the exact reasons there is no peace. Israel is the reason for one democracy in the ME. Hamas would go for Israel first, then USA and the west. IF they could, which they can't, even w/ Obama.

    • 690. 0 0
      # 675 oh lookie ballistic; you son of s-t-a-n (3rd try)
      • eric
      • 31.03.07
      • 01:30

      looky who's jumped on the "i'm-a-racist-can-you-tell?" bandwagon. good old ben jabo in shining colors! i hope you're a woman ballistic!; because i love you! hell...i love you even if you're not! you know you got 'em running when they have to fall back on their basic predjudices to attack you! which also explains their ignorant views concerning the palestinians...and i can imagine just about anyone who isn't a jew. and luckily... those with their mentalities only number a few they represent no one; least of all the jews that they ARE satan's litter they cannot elude hiding their inadequacy with the poison they spew... among all races and nations and creeds... there lurks hidden vermin such as these... for all their claims; they're judged by deeds... futile and lame; they're the devil's seeds... keep 'em running, ballistic! and ben; i'd asked in my last post if you let others think for you. don't bother answering: this post of yours already did.

    • 689. 0 0
      pece proposal- plan to destroy israel
      • paulo2005
      • 30.03.07
      • 21:35

      The saudi peace plan is a plan to destroy israel. In 1967 and 1973 they tried to destroy israel militarly - they failed. And now arab peacemakers promise peace in case israel does withdraw from territories conquered in the last war.., and in case Israel soes open its borders to millions of palestinians. In other way : They recognize Israel if Israel stop being Israel and does get flooded by millions of palestinians.

    • 688. 0 0
      #685 Eric - Consensus?
      • * BEN JABO
      • 30.03.07
      • 17:51

      it's only an ARAB consesus, doesn't allow for Israeli input. It's not a "Consensus" when it's a one-sided arrangement, forcing Israel to return to '67 lines. Those very lines were the ones Israel was at when she was attacked in '73. Acceptance of refugees, by all means, Jordan is Palestine, house them there.

    • 687. 0 0
      # 686 dearest maria, why haven't you answered me?
      • eric
      • 30.03.07
      • 08:10

      on this other talkback... http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/842503.html sighhhh... i'll have you know i spent alot of time... searching online... finding a good source... to enlighten your mind... cuz i love you, of course... and want you to see the light...

    • 686. 0 0
      ballistic...continuation (2)
      • maria
      • 30.03.07
      • 04:56

      that's why Jesus said that in John 8:44 ye are of your father the devil(a liar,murderer,etc)--we people do all these(break the ten commandments all the time-you would say,I've never murdered anybody,but if you get angry with someone without a cause you already murdered him or her)...nowadays, christians are acting like satan's children,aren't they? we ruin our testimony,that's why people doubt our christianity...

    • 685. 0 0
      # 664 to the esteemed ben jabo
      • eric
      • 30.03.07
      • 04:32

      now how could i forget that ben, when you and a few others keep repeating it monotonously over and over again. do you ever think for yourself; or do you always let the 'jewish virtual library' or someone else think FOR you? and reading this post, for reason it suddenly dawned on me why you and your fellow (*ahem*) thinkers always use the term "arabs" and never the "palestinians" when you do so. can't believe it never occured to me before because once i caught on...it so obvious. but hey; about the great news. isn't it wonderful that there is a consensus among all the arab countries to accept israel and recognize her? everything that israel has claimed it wants for the security of its existence is being offered, and all she has to do is what has always been "the right thing". the reasons for her aggression... oh ummm...i meant to say defensive posture... have will be removed if she agrees... no excuse not to now...right? i think we should celebrate, ben...shall we? salud, ben!

    • 684. 0 0
      hey ballistic....you really want to go on...(1)
      • maria
      • 30.03.07
      • 04:31

      don't you?....you see even these pharisees(religious leaders) didn't understand Jesus.. what He meant..john 8:43 why do ye not understand my speech?even because ye cannot hear my word...as I told you,Word of God is spiritually discerned...you did not even understand the verse I gave you..in galatians 3:26...if you're not a true christian you're still in bondage of sin,it doesn't mean I am sinless...I still sin, but God gave a promise to us, christians..it is found in 1 John 1:9... I'll take you to--romans 3:23 for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.(slave to sin-I became free when I became a christian)..proverbs 14:12 there is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof. are the ways of death..psalm 51:5 behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me."..romans 5:12 werefore,as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin;and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:....

    • 683. 0 0
      #681 - Ballistic - my error
      • * BEN JABO
      • 30.03.07
      • 03:03

      Typo: should have been "Satans Child", all else remains the same. I'm rather glad that your mommy was able to identify the father, in so many instances that can't be done. You want a cite for Hebrew Slavery, GOOGLE "JEW IN EGYPT", tomb carvings.

    • 682. 0 0
      #676 Hey Maria; Jesus said it; did you forget?
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 23:39

      Why shouldn't I have repeated what Jesus said and I gave you the cite. What is Jesus talking about and why? Don't give me another cite, what is he talking about in that cite. He says Satan has children. Well, if Jesus didn't lie, who are those children, and, more importantly who was Jesus talking to when he said it and who did he say it about? If you wanna talk bible, let's talk bible. I am not ignorant of what is in it and what is not. Be fair! You say you are and have been a bible student and if you are gonna proselytize people, you need to forthrightly answer their questions, and there are many thinking people have. God gave us minds to use. So, deal with Jesus talking and then we can go on with what you now cite. Was Jesus talking out of his head talking about Satan or his children or what? Regards.

    • 681. 0 0
      #675 Hey Ben Jabo; I don't know who "STAN's" child
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 22:28

      My Dad is Eddie; who is "Stan"? I thought you were not 'speaking' to me, so what brings you around a day late? Now, whenever were YOUR people slaves anyplace? Send me a cite for enslavement of YOUR people. You will have to talk to Barry Goldwater aka as Danite about this slavery stuff. Look over this thread and see their posts that I responded to. I guess, according to you, they have 'hangups' as this thread is about you and the Pals. Send them a message and tell them black slavery is not on the table as it would be most appreciated. You and yours are hung up on the horrors of the holocaust since you and yours from Europe and the USSR were not slaves anywhere, just as Sadat told CNN. "There is no history of BEGIN'S PEOPLE EVER being enslaved in Egypt". Arabs and Jews financing the slave trade both engaged in it here in the US and around the world, so what? Post Barry and Danite for me after you read the above and then post me as to who is hung up on what. Regards

    • 680. 0 0
      lakshmi..re. sam continuation...terror
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:56

      irgun leader begin stressed his desire to avoid civilian casualties. in fact,the plan was to warn the british so they would evacuate the building before it was blown up. three tel.calls were placed, one to the hotel, another to the french consulate, and a third to the PALESTINE POST, warning the explosives in the king david hotel would soon be denonated.on july 22, 1946, the calls were made. the call into the hotel was received and ignored.begin quotes one british official who supposedly refused to evacuate the building, saying:WE DON'T TAKE ORDERS FROM THE JEWS.as a result, when the bombs exploded, the casualty toll was high:total of 91 killed and 45 injured. few peole in the hotel proper were injured by the blast.for decades the british denied they had been warned.in 1979, however, a member of the british parliament introduced evidence that the irgun had indeed issued the warning.the officer who overheard the the conversation(warning)immediately left the hotel and survived.

    • 679. 0 0
      lakshmi...re. #589 sam...were they really terror.
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:44

      or just regualar crimes.........remember jews are just like us.........but suicide bombing,hijacking,bombing for no reason---are not normal....is this the one,lakshmi:MYTH:THE IRGUN BOMBED THE KING DAVID HOTEL AS PART OF A TERROR CAMPAIGN AGAINST CIVILIAN.....HERE'S THE FACT:the king davil hotel was the site of the british military command and the bcid. the irgun chose it as a target after british troops invaded the jewish agency on june 29, 1946, and confiscated large quantities of documents. at about the same time, more than 2,500 jews from all over palestine were place under arrest.the information about jewish agency operations, including intelligence activities in arab countries, was taken to the king david hotel.a week later,news of massacre of 40 jews in a pogrom in poland reminded jews of palestine how britain's restrictive immigration policy had condemned thousands of death.irgun leader begin stressed his desire to avoid civilian casualities. to be continued...

    • 678. 0 0
      #660 Hey Jojo; er, um, I do have an
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:32

      undergrad and professional degree, how about you? You are either a poor typist or poor speller, which is it? My degree included philosphy courses on the way to the BA and that fact is what tells me what the rah rah posters, like you, are pushing is BS! Besides, I am a woman, and your calling me illiterate is clearly a case of two pots calling a kettle black. You are squatting on Pal land; that is factual. What you are pushing is the BS in attempts to justify large scale theft by usurpers! Push it to your illiterate friends. Regards.

    • 677. 0 0
      Will Israel accept the hand of Peace?
      • Samuel Topen
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:32

      Will Israel accept the hand of Peace?Unfortunately,Israel today lacks a visionary Leader with a long term interest of its people.Israel is governed by politicians who are only keen to preserve their chairs in the senate. Middle Eastern political dynamics are changing rapidly,to the disadvantage of Israel.Treating Palestinians as subhuman beings similar to the old South Africa, depriving them of their basic human rights and killing innocent civilians on a routine basis applying the flimsy excuse of defending Israelis no longer carries weight with the international community apart from some members of present US Administration. Peretz/Beilin must force an early election with a peace now platform,accepting the Arab Peace Plan in its totality with the proviso that the refugees issue must be settled in a manner that will preserve the Jewish character of Israel.I believe the Arabs have made a genuine attempt at peace but fear Israel will resort to its old trick of dissecting the agreement

    • 676. 0 0
      hey ballistic...you should not have said that....
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:31

      if you're not a born again christian--you are one of them.................................. read galatians 3:26....for ye are all the children of God --------here's the catch------ BY FAITH IN CHRIST JESUS(I DID NOT SAY IT).you really want to go deeper and deeper that only God can answer some of your questions...jews are just like us with sinful nature...if we were alive during that time we might do the same as well......Hebrews 11:1,3..now FAITH is the substance of things hoped for , the evidence of things not seen.through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God,so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear..................ABOUT PROPHECY read the books of daniel,ezekiel,and revelation.I'm sure you bible has reference---for example:hebrews 11:1---references are:romans 8:24,2 corinthians 4:18...it seems to me you're well-educated....I'm not well-educated, but I love to read books.

    • 675. 0 0
      #673 Ballistic - 2ND TRY - Do you know what Lashon Hara means?
      • * BEN JABO
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:10

      You are a perfect example of Stan's child. An overwhelming bitterness that your tribal leaders sold your ancestors to Arab traders, for export and slavery in the new world. Jews were sold into slavery long before you were, however, it didn't or doesn't take up our every thought. Do you really think that by kissing up to the Arabs that they'll refund the passage money paid for shipping your ancestors?

    • 674. 0 0
      HENDERSON #660
      • JOJO
      • 29.03.07
      • 21:01

      How can one teach a prejudiced man some logic?Impossible!!. Perhaps u should go in for a degree in Logic either in a math dep't or philosophy dep't. Then some 5 yrs from now w'ell talk again. I want u to remain stupid; dont take my advise!!

    • 673. 0 0
      Maria; Satan has children!
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 20:40

      Read John 8:44 with Jesus talking to the Jews; he tells them that they are liars as is their father Satan. Why would Jesus say that in scripture? God has children and Satan has children doing respective work for each. It is rather presumptuous of you to say you have the sole line as to what will happen, however, when it does, we will all witness it. If Jesus accused the Jews he was talking to as being like their father, Satan, and a liar, what are you talking about? Gee, if you follow the bible, follow it. No need to go to other people's interpretation of it, is there? Again, who were the sons of God and who were the daughters of men? What is mankind? Man is an absolute term, so why would you need to talk about a "kind" of "man"? You need to study a tad more I fear, but I would like to hear your explanation for any of these questions. Faith is not a substitute for common sense when something written for your benefit cannot be explained to yourself in your own mind, is it?

    • 672. 0 0
      ballistic...you don't want to witness that war...
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 19:47

      the true christians won't see that when it happens...they will be raptured before that war.yes,gog and his allies(russia and muslim countries)will invade Israel and are decimated by God(see Daniel 11:40-45;ezekiel 38-39)....muslims believe in the prophecy of gog and magog, they appear to be totally ignorant of the fact that all nations in Ezekeil 38 that will be destroyed by God are muslim nations today, with the exception of russia.

    • 671. 0 0
      589 Sam,like to see some reference to Israeli terror
      • lakshmi
      • 29.03.07
      • 19:41

      Since your posts consistently blame the Palestinians for violence,but make no reference to Israeli violence one has to assume your partisanship. Saying you had a good personal relationship to Arabs is like people who say they have friends among blacks but deny them civil rights. And oh,how about saying that the attackes on Jewish civilians will end when the Occupation ends? Or are you incapable of thinking that Muslims can also be peaceful ? I have seen too many Israel supporters pass the buck when it comes to Israel.Until you come out and say that Palestinian violenc will end when the Occupation ends you'll remain a partisan,in my book.

    • 670. 0 0
      hey ballistic....just go to ....
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 19:23

      matthew henry's commentary--just type it in,it will take you there....I only use kjv.

    • 669. 0 0
      ballistic...HE will not come undercover...
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 18:57

      HE will come when you least expect it.when someone wants to rob your house,he won't call you,get ready,I will rob your house today....If Jesus gives us exact date and time when he comes,let's say tomorrow at 12 midnight,oh I still have few hours left to party or something. read these verses...1 corinthians 15:52;1 thessalonians 4:16,17.... acts 1:11 which also said, ye men of galilee, why stant ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.....................

    • 668. 0 0
      #66 Hey Maria; what bible are you reading?
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 18:12

      I thought you were a serious student of the bible. I am reading the same one you are reading and my question about sons of God and daughters of men may be found in Genesis 6:1. After you look at it, explain that to me. Regards.

    • 667. 0 0
      hey ballistic..I see you read genesis 6....
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 18:07

      during or before the flood.these people were destroyed....you know what,questioning things like this won't get you anywhere....why don't you just believe and have faith in Him....you will understand the Word of God if you have the Holy Spirit in your heart...because the Word of God is spiritually discerned...1 corinthians 2:14 but the natural man(not born again christians) receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God:for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them,because they are SPIRITUALLY DISCERNED.... ....I thought you're a mormon when you mention sons of god and daughters of men----mormornism embrace the teaching on: that they will become gods,that lucifer and jesus are brothers;eternal marriage.......you see satan is real---he can blind people so that they will believe LIES....he's very busy because he knows his time is near.you see in this world in our generation:christians are minorities---we let satan win and let down our HEAVENLY FATHER.

    • 666. 0 0
      hey ballistic...what type of books are you reading...
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:40

      sons of God.....are you a mormon or something? and your prophet is joseph smith?

    • 665. 0 0
      USA has no interest in peace
      • Colin
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:18

      to 21: Typical american Moron. (Small a big M)Eat any good books lately? As long as its in the US of A's interests to stir things up in the region there will never be peace. The sooner Israel dumps the "honest broker" and makes peace locally with its neighbours the better.

    • 664. 0 0
      #639 - Eric - sound's like your in a state of ecstasy
      • * BEN JABO
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:14

      Stolen, hardly, conquered YES!. Arabs had a chance for a state in '48, they chose to attack instead. Again in '56, '67 & '73. I would like to see you go to a casino, place a wager, lose and demand your money back. You might try to, but any normal person wouldn't. Arabs are demanding a return to '67 lines, then why in the devil did they attack in '73 when Israel was at the '67 lines?

    • 663. 0 0
      #619 Spyguy - You should go for retraining
      • * BEN JABO
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:10

      Israel's nukes are probably a reality. Enemies nukes, at this point in time, are a dream. If push comes to shove and Israel has no alternative, the end result will be devestating.

    • 662. 0 0
      To Sara
      • Jack
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:07

      Hamas may have provided social services but it was first and foremost an armed gang of fanatic islamists intent on killing Israeli civilians. They were heard on video chanting and vowing to regain even Tel-Aviv, after Jerusalem, Haifa, Acco etc. You make them out to be a peaceful, harmless lot. You probably do not speak Arabic and do not know them well enough.

    • 661. 0 0
      #635 well, there DNA; who are you today?
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:06

      Danite? No matter, yes, failure to accept responsibility for anything, no matter how readily apparent doing so would be appropriate and crying wolf all the time appear to be something taught and handed down. After a while evolution just chucks it right on over into the genes. How else can you account for a whole people who cries antisemitism (which includes Arabs) to each and every criticism, written or spoken? Victimhood has become a way of life, apparently.

    • 660. 0 0
      #623 Hey JoJo; gee, when I saw your runner
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 17:02

      "respect a smart thief", I thought you were gonna talk about zionists stealing Pals country, but instead found out that it was a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Regards.

    • 659. 0 0
      #655 Maria; I don't wrestle with scriptures at all;
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 16:59

      they make perfect sense to me. You beg the question as to whether God can make a mistake or change his mind. Changing one's mind and mistake are attributes which are mutually exclusive of god's attributes, aren't they? Perhaps God didn't change his mind about incest because the bible says the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair. So, who are these folks existing who saw Adam and his children since they were supposed to be the first? The universe in billions of years old, so where does the bible and "mankind" come into play? In fact man is millions of years old based on fossils found. How do you account for that? Regards.

    • 658. 0 0
      Hey Learner; whatever makes you think I don't
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 16:50

      believe in the bible? What I don't believe is the literal interpretation many give to it like Jonah being in the belly of a whale. I am also not an antisemite, which, by the way includes Jews and Arabs. I do believe that a war will take place in the ME, according to the bible, it will be Gog and Magog, yup, they will fight a mighty war. You apparently are one who muddles up antisemitism and justified criticism of bad actions by Israelis whereby you throw them together as though they are roughly equivalent;they are not. I use the word "heathen" to encompass those who profess to believe in God, however, their actions are not at all consistent with any of the teachings of the prophets; hence a heathen. The survival of the Jews, and their eventual expulsion from nations of the world at one point or other, had little if anything to do with what you are talking about. I am sure you are well aware of the charges underlying their expulsion and had little to do with scriptures.Regards

    • 657. 0 0
      #653 Hey there terrornator; what is up?
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 16:42

      Hey, just ignore my posts to Danite and Barry Goldwater, who are the same person. Seems they have been throwing american blacks into the blog as a diversion from the Pals issue. It really has nothing to do with the threads. However, I do agree with your statement. There were also many indentured servants. Regards.

    • 656. 0 0
      To Christa and Spyguy
      • Jack
      • 29.03.07
      • 16:38

      There is one big factor that both of you seem to overlook. Taking back millions of Arab refugees is far more of a risk to the large majority of Israelis than the rejection of an Arab plan demanding the right of return. Compensation yes in some cases, but to admit such large numbers would be tantamount to suicide. I'm sure most sensible people would agree, especially if they realise that just as many Jews were expelled from arab countries.

    • 655. 0 0
      ballistic....HIS thoughts are not our thoughts
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 16:24

      many events in the Bible are literal and you have to take it literally unless it tells you otherwise.Joseph was sold into slavery because his family didn't like his dreams and they were filled with envy and even went so far as to kill him,but because of one of his brothers the killing didn't happen.God meant it for good even though his family meant it for evil. Yes, Jonah was in the whale's belly for three days and it was a picture of the Lord Jesus Christ. God has many holy and divine attributes and He can withhold divine judgement because of His love, but never take it for granted. People married their own family members long before the law of Moses came to protect against incest. God never makes mistakes and you can't prove that by your unbelief. Just because you don't believe it doesn't make it useless as God will be true and every man a liar. You also can't wrestle with the scriptures because it will lead to your own destruction.

    • 654. 0 0
      650 jack,the historical differences . . .
      • sara
      • 29.03.07
      • 16:15

      between Palestine and Germany will take a thesis to explain.But here's one point: Hamas,was a social service movement before it came to power and Palestine is under Occupation. And 2 wrongs don't make a right.Since the claim is that Israel is a democracy the criticism stands.No democracy today has a Law that inscribes inequality,whatever the social attitudes.

    • 653. 0 0
    • 652. 0 0
      540 allan,the problem is other people also have the power to do..
      • sara
      • 29.03.07
      • 14:45

      what you are suggesting.Not just Israel and Big Brother who can bomb people back to the Stone Age. Forget your infantile fantasies.Grow up.Respect the Rule of Law.The U.N. system is still prepared to accept you back.Otherwise,there will be a strong move to suspend you until you return to your senses. In case, you have not noticed,Israel has become a pariah state in the world community.Get real.Grow up.

    • 651. 0 0
      Fortuna Benmayor #644
      • S
      • 29.03.07
      • 11:13

      I can't not say how wonderfully musical your name sounds to me! And, on top of it, is your very nice post! Best regards S PS - I am sorry I can't use my name too. This is because I live in Israel and need my privacy.

    • 650. 0 0
      To Sara 559
      • Jack
      • 29.03.07
      • 11:13

      Despite your sympathy for the democratically elected Hamas (Hitler was also democratically elected, but that didn't make him any less of a tyrant and a monster), you surely would not want the Israelis to conscript arab citizens and make them fight their brothers across the green line ? I would agree that Arabs in Israel may not be equally treated as Jews but there has been progress and things will only change for the better when there is peace. Have you considered how Jews were treated in the Arab countries ? Were they allowed to work in Government or join the army ? No, they were made to leave.

    • 649. 0 0
      Swiss # 493
      • christa
      • 29.03.07
      • 11:11

      Hi. Sorry, I have not seen any response. Did I miss it ? As indicated in another post, my main comment on the Arab peace plan is : it will not be easy to discard it because it complies to all UN resolutions.

    • 648. 0 0
      # 619 spyguy
      • christa
      • 29.03.07
      • 11:05

      You are definitely right. The Arab league makes a peace offer that conforms to all UN resolutions (and which was even suggested by Israel in 1967). The Arab countries agree on the issue, which is exceptional. Hamas will have no choice but to join later (at least they do not oppose it now), including for economic reasons. The rest of the world considers it a good plan to end the conflict. The game is on Israel's side. If Israel rejects the Arab plan, she will bear the responsibility. There will be another war.Israel knows she cannot win all the wars, and she cannot afford to lose one.

    • 647. 0 0
      Israel should stimulate Mideast adrenaline by
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 11:04

      hosting under medias coverage one by one all arabs states with no borders with Israel , and evaluate the chances of peace treaty with each , Such Israel move could neutralise the radical position that Arabs states collectively foster against Israel when they gather , such Israel action could neutralise arabs states collectively adopted threat of wars if no peace , Such Israel action could signal to arabs States as a whole that Israel cannot accept in principle Saudia initiative in its current format as refiled thru this Ryadh summit, Such Israel action could signal to arabs States as a whole that Israel is searching for ways to peace without arabs threats of war , that Israel isn't ditching the peace movement but rather searching for ways to build it , it is a legitime Israel right that cannot be denied and neither rejected , it is a valid , legitime Israel right to do so , If arabs states refuse , it is an other matter , but it cannot be said that Israel ditched ways to peace

    • 646. 0 0
      476#lebanese
      • alonitzafoni
      • 29.03.07
      • 11:02

      ARE YOU LOOKING FORWARD TOO THE RETURN OF THE IDF IN LEBANON???YOUR POST SAYS IT ALL, UNTIL YOU ARABS GET BLOODSHED OUT OF YOUR HEAD YOU CANT EXPECT ISRAEL NOT TOO DEFEND HERSELF,LAST SUMMER WAS CHILDS PLAY COMPARED TOO WHAT WE CAN REALLY DO TO YOUR FAVOURITE BUDDIES THE HEZBOLLAH!!!

    • 645. 0 0
      Test by "Charles Martel"
      • christa
      • 29.03.07
      • 10:47

      This test is irrelevant because you can use it for many existing countries, from Lebanon to Bosnia and from Bangladesh to Burkina Faso... BTW, Charles Martel was no friend of the Jews. I suggest that you read more about him. I can give you a author's name.

    • 644. 0 0
      SIMPLY PUT
      • Fortuna Benmayor
      • 29.03.07
      • 10:45

      Hamas "has no problem" with the parts of the Arab peace plan that liquidates Israel (the right of all Palestinians to immigrate into Israel) . They "only" disagree with the very existance of the state they are making peace with. This is utter drivel. Saudis and Arabs in general, can't be friends with God and the devil and expect Israel to bear the consequences. Moreover, they say to Israel: "take it or face our warlords". It's the Arab world which doesn't want peace yet, because ultimately and fundamentally, they fail to recognize the right of the Jewish people to have a Jewish State in its historical, original land.

    • 643. 0 0
      Question for the Cid
      • christa
      • 29.03.07
      • 10:35

      He was the enemy of the Muslims and the Jews, a figure of the Spanish reconquista. Why do you use his name ?

    • 642. 0 0
      Dino #302
      • S
      • 29.03.07
      • 10:33

      Quite telling your: "Yesterday the most important newspaper in Switzerland had as title : "Arab League renewing its offer for peace in exchange for land to Israel". Tomorrow there will most probably be the head- line: "Israel rejecting or at least ignoring the Arab league" offer. What should the average Swiss (European) reader think about that?" What can we Israelis, and Jews in general, expect from titles like that in Switzerland's media?? Fair handling? Or, just congratulate the few Dinos who are not antisemites and understand our plight?

    • 641. 0 0
      212#Vijaya is talking RUBBISH!!!!
      • Alon Fisher
      • 29.03.07
      • 10:32

      Israeli arabs can enroll in the army,and some like the Druze get drafted,an elite IDF unit comprising of Druze only had the highest Hezbollah body count last year in lebanon,and to your suprise they also vote, an arab village nearby had a turnout of likud as the party of choice!so take your apartheid in your backside!

    • 640. 0 0
      #43 indrajaya
      • JES
      • 29.03.07
      • 10:11

      In fact, it does no such thing. The resolution does not state or imply or "order" any particular sequence of actions by either side.

    • 639. 0 0
      A short partial summary
      • S
      • 29.03.07
      • 09:53

      1. "Haniyeh of Hamas abstained in the vote." 2. The Plan calls for "a just solution to the issue of Palestinian refugees". 3. "Javier Solana, urged Arab states Wednesday to be flexible in their land-for-peace offer to Israel". 4. " he (Solana) called the Arab initiative a general concept that has to be developed. He urged the Arabs and Israel to deal with the plan as a starting point in negotiations rather than a take-it-or-leave-it proposal. The important thing is to get the negotiations started. In any negotiations there are changes in positions, because negotiations are like that," Solana told... 5. "Arab League chief Amr Moussa urged Israel to accept the initiative rather than ask for changes." What transpires? Hanyeh's abstaining denies the entire ultimatum. Therefore a counter proposal is possible. If Hamas doesn't accept it (as a basis for negotiations), and Hamas still represents Palestinian people, then we go ahead with our lives and they with theirs.

    • 638. 0 0
      Brad #624
      • nathan
      • 29.03.07
      • 09:30

      Sorry Brad,old darling but we all know that the Jews WERE NOT there first and left quite a few times didnt they ? Nathan.

    • 637. 0 0
      Arab States unanimously approve Saudi peace initiative
      • Akram Malik
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:55

      to be honest, I was not expecting such a negative response, as if nobody wants peace. They all want to the worst case scenario. All the years we have seen that Egypt and Jordan have kept their end of the bargain, so one would therefore assume, that the other Arab states would do likewise. Finally, it comes down to one simple question do you want peace not? All the news that were nationals of other countries have the right to return there whenever they choose, they get compensated for the land they left behind. Why should it be any different for the Palestinian refugees?

    • 636. 0 0
      SUICIDE DOCUMENT= SAUDI OFFER!!!!!!
      • Ben Uziel-
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:53

      relegating Israel to the aushwitz border, right of return, which is the destruction of Israel- and partitioning of Jerusal-em. WHAT A ABSURD JOKE!!!!!! This is not negotiation, it's the reiteration of the same thing, the attempt to destrooy the jewish state, through ceremonial deplomacy and empty promises.

    • 635. 0 0
      To "ballistic"
      • DNA
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:38

      Hey Ballsy-istic Did I read you right? Were you espousing that jews are genetically inclined towards victimhood? From your posts I take it you're African American. Wow! Watch where you sling those pseudo-scientific theories. If there's nothing else that Jews and African Americans have in common then it's the fact that they've been victims of shitty pseudo-scientific racist theories - like yours. I think you better slow down there, cowboy. Someone might think you're an anti-semite.

    • 634. 0 0
      #281 Boycott re bruriah sarah software - could be a glitch
      • dana, Dir RRW R&D
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:37

      As you may have noticed, this type of software doesn't have very frequent upgrades. That's because it's a cheaper version of the ultra-RRW model, which originally was not even compatible with our lynux-based operating system (universal bating-capable). For the more recently released advanced version, see the kathy poster, now in beta testing. Not bad, ha? We are evolving, you know and got plenty of financial backing for out R&D operations. Them left-wingers better get some reinforcements - that old-fashioned 'reason' software is so passe!

    • 633. 0 0
      Pals train of human and economic development
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:29

      is terror industry in line with Islam martyrdom schools of thought , Pals failure to rise to today's challenges has put their Mideast's part future at risk , consequently pals exodus with Al Aqsa Dome of the Rock stones back to Mecca is an open table option , Olmert's failure to adopt such option should be viewed as if Olmert has ditched Zionism movement operations , Consequently Zionism train of human and economic development is hindered by Olmert , Subsequently , Olmert same as Abbas is using pals as human shield for Olmert's own midget interest guided by Olmert's shortsightedness , who has ditched Zionism movement operations , hinders Zionism train of human and economic development ,

    • 632. 0 0
      #281 Boycott re bruriah sarah software - could be a glitch
      • dana, Dir RRW R&D
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:29

      As you may have noticed, this type of software doesn't have very frequent upgrades. That's because it's a cheaper version of the ultra-RRW model, which originally was not even compatible with our lynux-based operating system (universal bating-capable). For the more recently released advanced version, see the kathy poster, now in beta testing. Not bad, ha? We are evolving, you know and got plenty of financial backing for out R&D operations. Them left-wingers better get some reinforcements - that old-fashioned 'reason' software is so passe!

    • 631. 0 0
      Compliance demands.
      • Myron Berliner
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:15

      Would you please use your influence to get FM Livni and other Israeli diplomats to use "comply" instead of "respect", "honor" or other weasel words in describing the Palestinian commitments made in past negotiations. It's typical ME to renig on yesterday's agreements. So, keep their noise to the previous agreements with "comply" and not "honor", "respect", etc.

    • 630. 0 0
      ohhhhhh baby, OHHHHH!
      • eric
      • 29.03.07
      • 08:14

      isreal better start thinking hard and fast... cuz this is hard to justify if you pass... an offer of peace and complete recognition... as long as you return what you have stolen... that's like everything israel "claims" that it wants... PLUS forgiveness for the crimes of its past! what more could anyone ask? time to play your cards and show your hand... your bet's been called; will you play or pass? don't be surprised everyone... if israel CREATES an incident to sidestep the proposal offered here...

    • 629. 0 0
      KiwiGirl
      • Brad
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:59

      So while the Jews are dying by the thousands eh? Well, lets make things plain. If the Israelies decided, by tomorrow morning, there would be little left of the entire Islamic world. And by the way, there is no legitimate peace treaty being offered. As to the Arab world taking what is rightfully theirs, that certainly doesn't include Israel or Palestine. The Jews, my dear were there first and never left. Those who could stayed to guard their birthright and the bulk that left, left involuntarily. Sound familiar. The truth is the PALS are squatters and the Arabs the most imperliastic and hegemonic peoples that have ever roamed on earth. Israel is just another place to overun. Kiwigirl, your the racist and so, so uninformed or are you just another example of deception &/or self deception that the Arab world has mastered as an art?

    • 628. 0 0
      #544 Ballistic
      • Learner
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:48

      Maybe you should read Ezekiel Chpt 38 and 39 to understand more about the situation in the middle east. Yes,I believe a greater war will come in the middle east no matter how man tries to make peace. As a heathen and a Jews hater you will want to know how "some of the Jews" will perish in this greater war we call " Armageddon". But in this war Israel will suffer great losses but Israel's enemy will be totally wipe off. Off course, Ballistics, you will not believe the bible,but don't you want to know how" some of the Jews will perish (133,000 or 1/3 of the people of israel in modern day translation)" in this war but ultimately the God of Israel will still keep the rest of them. Ever wonder why,a small nation like Israel could survive all these years with all its enemies surrounding them and a "burdenstone' to the world??????? You are a smart person,figure it out or maybe it's very difficult for an intellectual mind to understand!!!! Regards

    • 627. 0 0
      Arabs think they can win so they threaten war if no peace
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:34

      and peace on arabs terms equal Saudia initiative wich is for Israel to be democratically ruled under Arabs billion majority meaning Islamic dhimmis laws since secular Islam doesn't exist , So what happens when Arabs loose war, past experience shows that arabs keeps on coming back and threaten of war if no peace and peace on arabs terms equal Saudia initiative cause arabs think thet can win war , So why is it when Arabs armies and terror groups unite in war/terror against Israel , no one say disproportional use of force , no one speaks about violation of human rights , And why is it when Israel defend itself against Arabs armies and terror groups united in war/terror against Israel , Arabs and Co. shout disproportional use of force and violation of human rights ect... and make sure to abusively adopt a series of UN resolution taken against Israel ect... and yet despite worldwide condemnations everyone surely was glad with IDF operation against Iraq-Osirak and Entebbe hostages rescue, , Arabs-muslims -sunnis surely were glad that IDF punished shiite-nassarallah-hezbollah and yet they all say hezbollah won , but they say nothing to Siniora who let Hezbollah rearm and they neither say nothing to Siniora about jihadism upsurge in Tyre-Lebanon , , ,

    • 626. 0 0
      #254 Sara
      • Willy
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:14

      Sara,you are wrong. Israel and US are the only countries that dare to stand up to Islamofacism/terrorism. That's why you are still free to bash Israel/US today!!!!!

    • 625. 0 0
      #567 Zionist Org of America poll
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:13

      Hey, I looked at that poll, but it is not new; that 5-1 figure you cited is based on a very small pool of folks (less than 1,000) and is almost a year old. Is there one for 2007? If what you are citing is from 2006, and given the small sample, the poll may or may not be useless; esp with new peace plan. Regards.

    • 624. 0 0
      Vijaya, aggression has its price
      • Dan
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:04

      After you attack a country in order to annihilate its people because you disagree with the first UN resolution that started it all, you lose your right for call yourself a victim and there is no turning the wheel back. Hey, we will try to cut the Jews? throats and destroy them because we oppose the UN partition resolution, but if we lose, we will be able to call ourselves victims and go back. IN YOUR DERAMS! There is no precedence to this. Aggressor countries knew that they will pay a price if they lose. Period. Germany lost a quarter of its territory (occupied by France, Baltic republics, Poland, and more) and they lay no claim to it because in every other place in the world this is the way it works. In the Middle East Arabs can try to kill you and ask for everything to go back as if nothing happened ? or they will kill you. In all your examples the victims did not try to annihilate their neighbours.

    • 623. 0 0
      Respect the smart Thief
      • JOJO
      • 29.03.07
      • 07:02

      I take my hat off to the Saudis. They pulled off a swift one on the diplomatic community. They created a unity gov't under whose cloak many Jew hating countries will do business with Hamas. They r advertising themselves and all Arabs, including Hamas and Hezbalah , as peace lovers. And they get even a nice Jewish guy like T Friedman to recommend it. But it is treachery, without a doubt.The only thing that might be true about the offer is their threat of war. Dont be surprised if they try one jointly in the near future under the banner of rejected peace by Israel.

    • 622. 0 0
      556, 549 The 3 Lies of Sara:
      • Logician
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:54

      1. You say: Israeli Arabs are not allowed by LAW to enroll in the army. They ARE and many DO (voluntarily). 2. You say 2 million Israeli Arabs. Just 1 million, give or take. 3. You say Hundreds of thousands killed. You are off by a factor of a hundred, whatever you mean there.

    • 621. 0 0
      Gina #495 - I don't think so
      • Moises
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:54

      Plus, Panama is a beautiful place (and my place of birth), so it's not what I would call sad. "Organizations" reserve their work for refugees, which I am not.

    • 620. 0 0
      #48 Maureen Ann
      • Another Australian
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:52

      Have respect for others even if they disagree with you. You have a right to your own view and support whichever party you may like but others do not necessarily agree with you!!!!

    • 619. 0 0
      The hand grenade is now in Israel's lap
      • spyguy
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:45

      Israel has succeeded in uniting the Sunni Muslims and may even succeed in uniting the Sunnis and Shia behind a peace plan that Israel will have to treat seriously because the rest of the world (other than the US) will also treat it seriously. Even the US will have a hard time being too negative about the Saudi pace plan. So now what is Israel going to do? If Israel walks away, then basically it is saying we don't need any friends and bring on the war. The war will not happen immediately but it will happen and Israel will lose. The IDF knows this so maybe they should let the Israeli public know. Israel no longer has a weapons advantage nor does it have enough trained army to hold off an Arab attack for very long. The last option is nukes but that is just suicide as Israel will get nuked off the map in return. Checkmate Israel.

    • 618. 0 0
      What the...
      • Cheryl
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:44

      Are you kidding SA? It is the double standard of the Palestinian destroying peace EVERYTIME they blow up or kidnap an Israeli. Give me a BREAK! GOOD JOB Israel, for not giving in to these jokers. Quit being soft and stay the course Olmert. Plant a tree!

    • 617. 0 0
      #591 Maria; how would I recognize him
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:42

      what will he look like? Bible says he will come as a thief in the night; that sounds like he will be undercover working his will, and given what is going on, he may already be here unbeknownst to us, right? Regards.

    • 616. 0 0
      #591 Maria; you misunderstand me;
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:39

      I don't believe in the literal interpretation of the bible. Look at the story of Joseph; his brothers sold him because he was a favorite and rightful heir of his father; of course, you know the rest of the story. Do you believe Johah was in a whale, or was he swallowed up in a country and circumstance? Hey, what happened to that other question you were gonna answer, which is "does God change his mind?" You said he permitted incest; then decided against it on account of birth defects. Perhaps he changed his mind about the holy land. Can God make a mistake or change his mind as you indicated he did with incest? Regards. Ballistic.

    • 615. 0 0
      Johnyboy #574 - The truth is lost with people like you
      • Moises
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:38

      Camp David: "Barak offered to form a PALESTINIAN STATE initially on 73% of the West Bank (that is 27% less than the Green Line borders) and 100% of the Gaza Strip. In 10 to 25 years the West Bank area would expand to 90% (94% excluding greater Jerusalem)" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_David_2000_Summit Taba: "The two sides agreed that in accordance with the UN Security Council Resolution 242, the June 4, 1967 lines would be the basis for the borders between Israel and the state of Palestine." http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2001/1/Israeli-Palestinian%20Joint%20Statement%20-%2027-Jan-2001 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taba_summit I watched this myself on TV. Are you really going to lie to me to my face? Oh yeah, I also met Dennis Ross (yes, the architect of Camp David) once and he doesn't agree with you. Stop spreading lies about my country and my people.

    • 614. 0 0
      585Double Click: Warning of and stating that are different things
      • Logician
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:36

      Also, NYT headlines have often been in error. What matters is what Einstein really said, not what the Times headline said.

    • 613. 0 0
      #580 Hey Equalizer; you are quite right
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:35

      Many were stolen; some were sold; you are absolutely right. However, you understand that sometimes your own people do not do things in their own peoples interest, right. What other fact could underlie Jewish financing of Hitler? So we all recognize shortcomings of our own and move on. Regards.

    • 612. 0 0
      cowerdly dictators & dresses
      • MIKE KATZ
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:32

      ...if they are good in one thing it is that they would do anything to appease their masters in Washington & "Israel" in order to hold on to power.

    • 611. 0 0
      #397 "you and yours" is better cause
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:22

      it does not encompass right minded Jews; just those who think like you. As far Jews here, well, they are not brainwashed zionists and recognize you will have to unarse the land. In the meantime, they live their lives without nail biting. There are loads of Jews here who live with everybody else including Moslems. Didn't you read the Haaretz article which indicated Nevada Jews are not 'religious'. In fact, given the numbers here, there are few synagogues as the article pointed out and they are not heavily attended. This is sin city, dude!!! When in Rome, do like the Romans do.

    • 610. 0 0
      579Double Click trying to weasle out of his Einstein fake quote
      • Logician
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:21

      See # 517, #530 and # 563.

    • 609. 0 0
      To Swiss (Dino): I have to disagree today
      • A Lebanese
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:16

      Dear Swiss (Dino), I do appreciate your balanced and diplomatic positions usually, but I have to say that I am surprised at the conciliatory tone you adopt today in favor of Israel: the Saudi plan is a recall of UN resolutions and International Law. Why should this be negotiable? It is the lack of justice that pushes people in making what they believe is their own. On all sides.

    • 608. 0 0
      523 Right of Return is no right and there will not be a return
      • Logician
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:05

      There is no Right of Return for 20 million Germans to their homes in Russia (was E. Prussia), Poland, Czech Republic (was Sudeten) from which they were forcibly removed, AFTER WWII in 1945. There was no such condition put on Poland or Czech Republic when they joined the EU. Not even to pay compensation for the land, for well known reasons that apply equally to the Arab side. They not only started the war against Israel but also forced out all Jews from Arab/Moslem countries, with more in numbers and property then Pal refugees (who mostly left due to war threats from Arab armies).

    • 607. 0 0
      #552 Jeff Northridge sure does streeeeetch his definitions
      • Johnboy
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:05

      "Are you referring to the rebel provinces of Judea and Samaria?" Hmmmm. Rebel Provinces? It's a novel argument, but can it hold water? Maybe. IF the modern State of Israel can prove prior sovereignty over them at some time in its existance. Let's see.... State of Israel, established 1948. Nope...not seeing sovereignty over WB or Gaza at independence. War of 48-49. Nope....not seeing Israel establishing sovereignty during that fighting. 1949-67. Nope. Most definitely not. 1967- . "Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war". Sorry, Jeff. Can't see any time when THIS modern State of Israel ever had sovereignty over the Gaza or the WB, so there is no way they can possibly be "rebel provinces" of THIS state.

    • 606. 0 0
      Well, Jeff, howdy; your post rests
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 06:02

      on a rather shakey premise, doesn't it? What makes you think Israel can chug along with the status quo? Peace with Egypt and Syria (but not their populations) is paid for by american tax dollars. Well, I don't agree with you that the situation will remain at the status quo, nope, cause when US leaves Iraq, and she will, whole different ball game. Better go for peace while it is offered. Catch that peace train. Regards.

    • 605. 0 0
      Why tge Saudi "Plan" is Numnuts!
      • Brad
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:58

      What kind of "thinking" can underlie a demand that Israel first agree and then negotiate? What is there to negotiate once there is agreement. If the concept is agree in principle to territorial concession, some sort of East Jerusalem capital for the PALS and some sort of just solution for the refugees, then fine. Says so but be mind tha agreements in principal are guidelines, not agreements and hence need to be negotiated. Why don't the Arab States agree to Isreael's plan? Permit the creation of a peaceful state on historic Jewish lands where PALS & their goods can pass through Isreali territory. Then, after everyone has agreed with that plan, one can negotiate. There is another very serious problem of logic in the Saudi plan. The pay-off for Israel is peace but Hamas, the governing authority of the PALS refuses to accept the Saudi plan and at the same time is formally committed to the destruction of Israel. And, given its conduct, this is more than a formality.

    • 604. 0 0
      #236 Hey Danite the Mexican
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:55

      Boy, Hannah is right. You are a brain washed desperate zionist. However, yeah for the mexicans; they are coming in, however, no nuclear war is contemplated nor are they sitting in the middle of 1.2 Arabs, big difference nor will oil be interrupted. Yeah for the Mexicans, you moron. We've never had a "mexican" I saw on here; they are too busy making an honest living. Get some help, why don't you? I'll tell the Mexicans to send you a UHaul coupon to move your junk sooner than they will be using it.

    • 603. 0 0
      Has Olmert ditched the movement of Zionism operations
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:52

      for Arab League/ Saudia initiative that plays with words in palace halls " , , , would a clue be that Olmert vows to oppose Homesh Istaelis-Jewish protest ,

    • 602. 0 0
      This is no change in Arab demands
      • Denton
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:46

      This is nothing. They demand that Israel go back to where it was before they attacked her. They also demand that Israel fix the refugee crisis that was created by repeated Arab aggression by absorbing an huge Arab population, thereby commiting national suicide. Of course the Arab community agrees to this. Especially since half of the PA abstained, thereby claiming it agreed to nothing when it starts slaughtering innocent Jews. Again.

    • 601. 0 0
      Arab League chief Amr Moussa response to Olmer's Sde Boker Speech
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:40

      "We are at a crossroads, it is either we move towards a real peace or see an escalation in the situation." , , , Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal response to Olmert's painfull concessions policy , , , "If Israel refuses, that means it doesn't want peace. Then [the conflict] goes back into the hands of the lords of war." , , , Arabs response to Olmert's request about 1948 UN 194 = we all want to F...U first, say yes in principle than we talk price , , , Olmert's response to Abbas for Shalit kidnapping = 100M$ Thanksgiving gift , and Shalit is not release , , Olmert's restraint policy = response to pals weapons smugglin' and pals quassams rockets , , pals intimidation threats works against Olmert,

    • 600. 0 0
      Hey GZLives
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:35

      Whatever are you talking about? Overcome lumping hatred for Jews with hatred of their despicable behavior vis-a-vis the Pals. Haaretz does you and others a service and BTW it is a German-Israeli newspaper. If you wanted it to post only posts of congratulations between zionists on their complained of behavior, you should not have sold an interest to the Germans. It the BEHAVIOR, OCCUPATION that is complained of. Sadly you are one of many who feels ANY criticism of zionist terrible behavior is antisemitism. You guys have killed any viable response to an overused, every day charge. Israel's behavior will continue to be criticized; get used to it. Regards.

    • 599. 0 0
      #567 Zionist Organization of America"
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:29

      Are you joking? That's it; it must be a joke. Some humor is needed. Regards.

    • 598. 0 0
      Accept the Saudi proposal, it makes sense
      • Richard Witty
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:20

      The Saudi proposal and as worded including a just resolution of rights of pre-1948 Palestinian residents, IS the success of the Zionist effort, and should be unequivocally accepted and adopted. It is simple. The only logic that would conflict with it is the logic that "all of the land is Jewish", which is both ludicrous from a civil perspective and ludicrous from a religious perspective, as the wording in Torah of promises of the land are consistently conditional on "keeping my commandments" and never unconditional. And by "my commandments", the assertions refer to the primary 10, and NOT whether one turns on a light on Shabbat.

    • 597. 0 0
      Mark of Lewiston
      • Gina
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:19

      For over a year you've been chanting some mantra about how it doesn't hurt for Israeli and Palestinian leaders to sit down and talk. Of all people who should be doing cartwheels--

    • 596. 0 0
      hey ballistic...HE might come tonight.
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:17

      you don't want to be left behind,do you?ballistic.....literally speaking-the promised land still belong to the jewish people.you have head knowledge of the bible,but it's not in the heart.don't worry about the jews.you'll be accountable for yourself.God will deal with them.don't tell me that if you see HIM face to face----and say to him---your own people don't believe in the MESSIAH so do I.someone already planted seed(the Word of God)in your heart...sadly,it didn't go to the good ground.it's not too late,isn't it?bush and condi are compromisers.remember:isaac was the promise one(son of the freewoman)---not ishmael(son of the bondwoman)--------(has spiritual meaning).the WORD OF GOD is really powerful,isn't it?----it offends people.

    • 595. 0 0
      Double Click
      • David
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:17

      Washington, Jefferson and Minutmens was a terrorist group, with judeo-chritian roots.

    • 594. 0 0
      sara # 542 That's Absurd!
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:12

      Howdy Sara; There are about 1.4 million Arab Israelis and about 0.25 million Palestinians (mostly in East Jerusalem) who live within Israel proper. It is not surprising that there are different laws for the Palestinians who hold permanent residency status in Israel because they are foreigners (i.e., they do not have Israeli citizenship). Of the Arab Israelis (who do have Israeli citizenship) about 75% are Muslims, 15% Christian, and 10% Druze. Theoretically, all Israeli citizens have equal rights under the law. There are some exceptions, however. The biggest one is the mandatory draft at age 18 for both males and females into the IDF. Israeli citizens who are Muslim or Christian or who are divinity students or who are unfit for military service are exempt from conscription. Jews, Druze, Circassians, and I think Bedouins are not exempt. Anybody can enlist in the IDF including foreigners, Muslims, and Christians if they meet the requirements (being young and able to speak Hebrew helps

    • 593. 0 0
      Mideast tensions rise just by talking peace
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 05:05

      The Lords of Wars hijacked Mideast peace , Martyrdom schools of thought = The Lords of Wars , A conversation between 2 graduated students from Martyrdom schools of thought , A: lets go see movie , B: Nahhhh , don't want to , A: lets take a walk by the sea shore , B: Nahhhh , don't want to , A: lets go browse the mall , B: Nahhhh , don't want to , A: lets go to a concert , B: Nahhhh , don't want to , A: lets go to war , B: OK , , , Welcome to the 72 years old virgin heatlh care rehabilitation center

    • 592. 0 0
      #494, Jeff Northridge
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:59

      Many among the gulf states are terrified of the shia influence. Bahrain has a majority shia population. Their major concern is to reduce friction and to curb the shia influence. They are threfore trying to put their differences aside by embrassing hiz and hamas, and even the secular assad whose regime is responsible for the murder of pm hariri, a friend of the saudi king. They have nothing to lose, and everything to gain by putting forth this plan. Superficially, it presents them as peacee advocates, but as we all know, they have conceded nothing. They hope to placate their extremists, satisfy the palestinians, and yet also play the conciliator in the eyes of the western world. By the way, have you noticed who is absent today?

    • 591. 0 0
      Hamas adopt "ambiguity Policy"
      • Fred
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:57

      The beauty of having an ambiguous policy is that you never have to be responsible for anything related to that policy. And given the trust that generates amongst interlocaturs,perhaps there is NO responsibility taken for anything

    • 590. 0 0
      #549 'Logician' Is the NEW YORK TIMES IN ERROR?
      • Double Click
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:57

      If Einstein did not say the things in his New York Times Letter to the Editor, I apologize. I was merely quoting from an original Dec. 4,1948 New York Times letter which was given to me in 1953 by an Israeli historian when I took a course called 'The Analysis of Propaganda' in college. After researching on the Internet, I found the same article on: http://www.rense.com/general59/ein.htm It is identical to the one that I have in my possession in which the headline reads: Einstein Letter Warns of Zionist Facism in Israel.

    • 589. 0 0
      Lakshmi- Don't put words in my mouth
      • Sam
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:54

      First, if Arabs can criticize Jews, so can Jews critcize Arabs. I don't call every Arab who disgrees with me a racist. That's the cheap argument of a loser. I stand on my argument that Palestinians send other Palestinians on suicidal death missions and don't discriminate which Jews they kill or how they kill them. I also stand on the argument that the Palestinians try to delude the West into thinking they are offering a peace with a Jewish state and a Palestinian one when they are offering no such thing.On a personal basis I have lived in Israel and Canada and never had a bad relationship with any Arab whether at work, school or socially.

    • 588. 0 0
      Tell the Saudis to "Shove it".
      • DK
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:53

      Are we to believe that the debauched Saudis, who refuse to allow any religion other than their own death cult to be practiced and who are THE purveyors and financiers of global terrorism (including 9/11) will be allowed to determine your future? Despite our governments appeasement of this deadly snake, Americans know who our enemies are and the Saudis remain on the top of the list. Their "sign this-or War" threat ought to be delivered to them to reform their hell-hole nation or lose their oil fields (and terror money) under occupation. Stop playing their games and prepare for battle- they don't want peace, only your destruction. Now that the terrorists have a government (and an address in Gaza), tell them the next time they fire their junk rockets at you it will be considered an act of war and any land captured from this point on will be kept- forever.Time to put someone "mean" in power like your defense minister or Netanyahu. ps-no,I'm not Jewish-sorry to disappoint you bigots.

    • 587. 0 0
      Those activists are responsible not only to anti-Zionism
      • Issac
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:50

      but also to anti-Semitism, and they should be punished accordingly.

    • 586. 0 0
      End Int'l blockade = maintenance of martyrdom operations
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:46

      End Int'l blockade = maintenance of terror representation and infrastructure

    • 585. 0 0
      Ballistic and her slave trade relatives
      • The Equalizer
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:41

      You misspeak at every chance you get, yup, you do. Who do you think sold those slaves in Africa to the buyers? Yup, good old blacks, ballistic, yup, good old blacks. How about do some good for your own kind and leave the Israelis and the Arabs to themselves. Yup. yessirree you should.

    • 584. 0 0
      #546 Charles Martel and his straw man
      • Johnboy
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:40

      "If you are so sure that "Palestine, the country, goes back through most of recorded history" " And who is claiming that, Charles, except the zionists who want to put it up as a straw man so they can nock it down? People like you, for example. The USA has only existed for a few centuries. Germany isn't even that old. My own country is only a little over a century old, and the State of Israel has only been in existance since 1949. They all came about as a result of acts of self-determination, Charles. The Palestinians have that same right, and the fact of near-on 60 years of continuous occupation does not extinguish that right. The Palestinians can have a nation because the land is theirs, and a Palestinian State is what they want for their land. And the State of Israel can no more take that off them than the Kingdom of Jordan could prior to 1967. Simple as that, really, and your history quiz has no bearing on that reality.

    • 583. 0 0
      To Sara #542
      • dovvod
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:33

      Dear Sara: Thanks for your comment. It just confirms to me that critics of Israel have not idea what they are talking about. You are wrong in every statement you make. Arabs can buy land anywhere in Israel proper. (On the other hand by PA law it is a capital offence for a Pal to sell land to a Jew. Do you know what capital offence means? Death.) Arabs do not serve in the iSRAELI army because they would be placed in a situation where they would have to face brethren Arabs. They do not want to serve in the idf. And there was no ethnic cleansing. I know you are surprised about this one. That is because you (and many others) believe Arab lies. The Palestinian refugees are there from many causes but the main one is that they were asked to leave by the Arab governments to help their war effort. Please go get an education.

    • 582. 0 0
      Peter SM
      • Double Click
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:26

      The Herut was disarmed as you say, but only after they won their freedom from the British. Perhaps it's freedom that Hamas wants. Also, the Herut party formally merged into Likud in 1988, so the adherents of Revisionist Zionism are alive and well. And lest the less educated Israelis and other readers of Talkback forget, Menachem Begin, a leader of this early terrorist group, was elected Prime Minister.

    • 581. 0 0
      Osama Bin Laden's deputy Ayman al-Zawahri with regard to Saudia
      • Joseph E .
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:26

      initiative says about Hamas " "They have ditched the movement of martyrdom operations - for a government that plays with words in palace halls," , , , Hamas quick to issue a statement of reassurance says " "We will not betray promises we made to God to continue the path of jihad and resistance until the liberation of Palestine, all of Palestine." , , , Abbas support the Saudi initiative and says a sea of peace that begins in Nuakchott and ends in Indonesia , he just conceals that Mecca deal put him under Hamas rule , , , at the Riyadh summit, , Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal says "If Israel refuses, that means it doesn't want peace. Then [the conflict] goes back into the hands of the lords of war , , , Osama Bin Laden's deputy Ayman al-Zawahri couldn't be more satisfied , no muslim has ditched his martyrdom operations , muslim 72 years old virgin's principal of Islam martyrdom schools of thought rules high ,

    • 580. 0 0
      419 Gina - Condie's Meetings
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:26

      The series of meetings that Condie set up specifically exclude making progress towards peace. At least that's how I read the article. They'll discuss forms of governance and debate Jefferson vs Machiavelli, I guess.

    • 579. 0 0
      #522, Gina
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:25

      Thank you very much, dear Gina. Regards, Cipora

    • 578. 0 0
      Of course, they approve this plan - it has no chance to succeed
      • Marwan مروان خوري
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:22

      By demanding that Israel committed demographic and economic suicide by accepting the "right of return" of those who willingly fled Israel as well as other non-starters, the Saudis are trying to appear as if they are actually doing something while giving nothing in negotiations. This is move by the Arab League to placate the West but give no real offer to Israel. Even as a starting point this "plan" is non-workable. The Road Map stipulated Palestinians crack down on terror groups in return for concrete Israeli steps. Palestinians have done none of it, just the opposite - the terror groups are the government, so any Israeli moves are futile since the other side's promises are empty.

    • 577. 0 0
      #135 Moises
      • Johnboy
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:18

      "Oslo times, Israel provided the PA with weapons, trained its police officers, collected taxes for it and recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people. " And now withholds taxes, shoots PA policement, and refuses to talk to the PLO. Gosh! So much for the importance of prior agreements! "They also offered them a state in Oslo and Taba with recognition automatically implicit." Haha! "automatically implicit"!!! WTF is THAT? Israel did NOT offer statehood at Oslo. They offered semi-autonomy, and a *promise* that in the future (now the distant past) they would sit down with the PLO for final status negotiations. Same at Taba, only - so sorry, Arafat! - Israel took some of that promised autonomy back. But - heh! Cheer up, Arafat! - they still promised those final status talks. Real Soon Now. He went to his grave without Israel ever *actually* getting around to those promised final status talks. That the thing about zionists; they are all talk.

    • 576. 0 0
      vijaya # 516 What Temper?
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:17

      Howdy Vijaya; I didn't lose my temper. It's around here someplace. Ah yes, I found it. It was in my desk drawer underneath some miniature American flags. I'm not contemptuous of the UN General Assembly or of the International Court of Justice either, but they do not have the authority that you would ascribe to them. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was passed by the UN General Assembly and not by the UN Security Council which is why most countries simply ignore it. The biggest violators of the UDHR are communist and Islamic countries and not Israel. You still have not provided an international law which specifically states that all refugees from any armed conflict whatsoever have an "absolute" right to return to their places of origin after the cessation of hostilities. If such were the case, then there are hundreds of millions of displaced people who would like to know about it.

    • 575. 0 0
      Haaretz why do you put these Jew Haters
      • GZLives
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:17

      here? is there some purpose to allowing the overt Jew hatred from all those who post daily here under one, two and sometimes three different names ? What's the point? Is there some redeeming value we Jews are missing by this daily barrage here. We already know what they all think and they know what we think so what's the point except giving hope to these SOB's that they might change our minds and agree with them that we are cheats, thieves, murderers, terrorists, fascists, liars ? And now it seems you feel the need to post some of them a dozen times or more on a single thread. Its time to rethink this policy or perhaps just change the name of the newspaper to the Muslim Brotherhood Press so it all makes perfect sense.

    • 574. 0 0
      #518 Peter.Thank God for non-Islamic Holocaust,slavery....
      • Toronto's Finest
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:09

      ...genocide,segregation, war crimes of unbelievable proportions, etc. Only a recist would point a finger at Islam while ignoring the (mostly Christian) slave trade involving millions, the genocides in the Americas and Africa,THE Holocaust, Rwanda,Bosnia, Srebonica, the devestaion of Iraq. Yes, Peter embrace the non-Muslims. Where will you go when THEY feel that you too are a threat?

    • 573. 0 0
      Look Up In The Sky! It's A Bird! It's A Plane! No It's...
      • Yosemite
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:06

      the return of the ambiguous Saudi Peace Plan from over ten years ago! What's Abdullah Hussein doing bashing the USA? Hey Abdullah! Knock it off! Don't you know why you still sit on the throne?

    • 572. 0 0
      Stupid Israeli racism again
      • kiwigirl
      • 29.03.07
      • 04:01

      No to the Peace plan? Then I guess the whole Arab world will have to take by force what is rightfully the Palestinians land. When your people are dying by the thousands you may wish you had taken this very reasonable peace plan. Palestine will settle into a type of democracy when they no longer have to line up at checkpoints, get beaten and shot for no reason, are able to export their goods and grow their economy, and build homes that will not be torn down at whim. Don't say you weren't warned. This is a chance to negotiate but the rabid racists on this forum are just the type to get you closer to war!

    • 571. 0 0
      Let's not forget guys, Hamas is a child of Israel!!!
      • Toronto's Finest
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:59

      When Hamas first appeared as a charitable organisation (as it still is today)Israel tacitly supported it as a viable opposition to the PLO, and it's corruption. The Law of Unexpected consequences has come back to haunt Shin Beth. That is one problem Israel can't combat, both Hamas and Hizbollah are basically dedicated to social services, and they deliver....sure they often get off the track and dabble in militancy, but that is the way of the world.

    • 570. 0 0
      Check out this poll...
      • RP
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:55

      Americans oppose giving land to Palestinians by a margin of 5-to-1, according to a new poll conducted by McLaughlin & Associates for the Zionist Organization of America. Add me to this list. In fact, I favor taking the Temple Mount away from the hands of those that say all infidels must die. Don't play ball with religious murderers! DOWN WITH ISLAMO-FASCISM!!!

    • 569. 0 0
      will a palestinian state bring peace to the ME?
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:51

      the model and inspiration for bin laden's suicide bombers who hit the world center and all other suicide bombings and shootings since then is arafat and the so-called palestinians. giving them a state of their own will only enable them to really go after what they believe is theirs, namely: the entire region of palestine,including the kingdom of jordan. yes,they covet jordan as well. they tried taking jordan away from late king hussein. remember? he repelled them.there never was a palestinian state or a palestinian nation.in fact there are no PALESTINIANS.these are ARABS living in a region that, historically, has been called many things, including palestine.but there is no palestinian people.they have the same ethnicity, the same language, the same religion, the same culture, the same cuisine,etc.as all the arabs.the terrorists are not freedom fighters fighting for their palestinian independence. they are simply arab terrorists.

    • 568. 0 0
    • 567. 0 0
      Greek cities unanimously approve Trojan Horse initiative
      • Joe
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:47

      Greek cities unanimously approve Trojan Horse initiative. Arab states unanimously approve Saudi peace initiative. Greek cities unanimously approve Trojan Horse initiative. Greeks will not compromise. Troy must accept Trojan Horse.

    • 566. 0 0
      517 post & Einstein quote are fake, #261 Twain is true
      • Logician
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:47

      A fake quote with no backing. Einstein seriously considered an offer to be President of Israel.

    • 565. 0 0
    • 564. 0 0
      Doubleclick.The herut party no longer exists.Hamas got elected
      • PETER SM
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:42

      just recently as the government of Palestine. Their charter was there for all to see including the Pals and their syncophants. Herut was disarmed,get the difference?

    • 563. 0 0
      Dear Non-Israeli's Take the Test below!
      • Charles Martel
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:41

      If you are so sure that “Palestine, the country, goes back through most of recorded history”, I expect you to be able to answer a few basic questions about that country of "Palestine:" 1. When was it founded and by whom? 2. What were its borders? 3. What was its capital? 4. What were its major cities? 5. What constituted the basis of its economy? 6. What was its form of government? 7. Can you name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat? 8. Was Palestine ever recognized by a country whose existence, at that time or now, leaves no room for interpretation? 9. What was the language of the country of Palestine? 10. What was the prevalent religion of the country of Palestine? 11. What was the name of its currency? Choose any date in history and try and find the approximate exchange rate of the Palestinian monetary unit against other world currencies on that date. 12. Have the Palestinians left any artifacts be

    • 562. 0 0
      cause for optimism
      • Ibrahim
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:41

      I think people are just fade up with this on-going dispute. It is about time that both sides accepted the other sude?s right to co exist by their side and move on to build a better future for their future generations of both peoples. I think the Arabs led by the Saudis and Egyptians are serious about stricking a permanent peace deal with Israel. I hope Israel responds favourably. I reckon if the Jews and Arabs worked together they can transform the region into a great economic success. Ibrahim

    • 561. 0 0
      JERUSALEM and MECCA
      • Comintomonsense
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:37

      When Saudis will give up Mecca Israel will give up Jerusalem. Salam

    • 560. 0 0
      Peace thru SUPERIOR FIRE POWER!
      • Charles Martel
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:34

      Saudi Peace yeah right! Help America fix Iraq.

    • 559. 0 0
      Peter Sm,2 million Arabs in Israel are second class citizens
      • sara
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:32

      They are not allowed by LAW to enroll in the army or to hold property except in certain locations.In today's democracies by Law ethnic minorities are guaranteed equal rights.Not in Israel.That is why it is not a democracy. As for Arab survival,this was not something Israel had planned for.Have you seen the recent state sponsored poll about whether there should be a 'transfer' of the Arab population? And I hope you are not denying that the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians did not take place.That would be a denial and a revision of history.'

    • 558. 0 0
      Judge Arabs by their actions. They talk peace while starting war.
      • Gili
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:29

      Stop listening to all the crap coming out of their mouths. If they're really so interested in peace let them show it through *actions*. Israel withdrew from the Sinai desert. Israel withdrew from Lebanon. Israel withdrew from Gaza. The Arabs have repeatedly said they wanted peace but in actuality started wars. Let them keep talking until they're blue in the face. Until they *show* they want peace their words are meaningless.

    • 557. 0 0
      GENOCIDE of ISRAEL!
      • The Cid
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:24

      You people are NUTS! You have no clue to histical facts! or an understanding of Islam! Get a clue you clueless!

    • 556. 0 0
      Sam ,say that you don't like the Palestinians
      • lakshmi
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:21

      Your two points are lame: they send naive people to their deaths.I hope you remember that one of these naive people was a paralysed old man sitting in a wheel chair which Israel dropped 3 rockets on from 3 planes.You don't understand their concept of Martyrdom because you only understand killing other people by people armed to the teeth and sitting in armoured trucks or dropping cluster bombs from airplanes on innocent people.You understand WAR and COLLATERAL DAMAGE,inflicted on other people.You do not understand someone killing himself/herself. As for deluding the West with promises of peace,you make me laugh.Does the West even know how to spell the word ? Let's face it.You are a refined racist,neverthless a racist.

    • 555. 0 0
      Deborah # 505 Tick, Tock
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:21

      Howdy Deborah; "The offer is there and it is now up to Israel to agree if it wants any hope of peace." Israel rejects the "generous" offer because it entails the destruction of the State of Israel via the infiltration of 4 million hostiles into Israel. "Israel cannot keep fighting wars" Why not? She has no other place to retreat to and if the Arabs keep attacking her, she has no choices but to fight back or surrender and she isn't going to surrender before a few million Arabs have been martyred by nuke first. "Occupation is immoral and unsustainable and something has to give." Are you referring to the rebel provinces of Judea and Samaria? China occupied Annam (North Vietnam) for over a thousand years between 111 B.C. to 906 A.D. An occupation may not be sustainable forever, but some occupations have lasted a lot longer than some countries or enpires have. Rethink your peace proposal!

    • 554. 0 0
      #447 Lynn, relax, I WORK and am
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:19

      just getting in. I will look at the poll, however, I won't bother if it is a Fox poll, although their last one was the same as the BBC one; I guess they could not fudge it. More than 60% of the americans are against the war now, many not before, and Congess by majority is against the war even though they voted for it. I guess your point is the glass is 2/5ths full and not 3/5s empty. I dunno know if Bush's veto can be overriden, but he has serious problems. Americans want OUT! OUT! OUT! Repubs are leaving Bush worrying about 2008; but he still has Barney (not Laura)!

    • 553. 0 0
      labhras...you thought I wouldn't open your post..
      • maria
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:19

      I can use my own dialect and my language.....guess them--------magandang gabi....nanu nang oras?----bla,bla has meaning to you eh.hey forget it........................

    • 552. 0 0
      Peter Sm, YOUR PEOPLE KILL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
      • sara
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:13

      and you are destructive of other peoples' property and infrastructure.You create thousands of refugees.You are the champion DEATH DEALERS. You call it WAR, oh yes COLLATERAL DAMAGE. When other people respond to this barbarism you call it TERROR.

    • 551. 0 0
    • 550. 0 0
    • 549. 0 0
    • 548. 0 0
      Call their buff and burry the idea of a Palestinian State.Time
      • Akram Zekaria
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:09

      Both Cipora & Mark Lincoln used the word 'ambigiuty' in their respective postings 14# & 179#. Isn't that the key word the coflict orbiting arround ? Ambiguity ! Erase Ambiguity from all this jabberish talk and you will find the sterling truth. But how one can do that ? Here,could be a flimpant suggestion. The West Bank & Jerusalem according to the principals of 'land for peace';those who lost the land should have it back like the Golan should go back to Syria; 'The West Bank and Jerusalem' should go back to Jordan. What the Palestinians have to do with it any way ? So, why Israel on the principal of 'call their bluff',test the water;and add a little bit of ambinguity; offer this land back to Jordan on the conditions that there should never be a Palestinian State on that land for ever.And the question of a Palestinan state will be burried to enternity ?Time to call their bluff and bury the idea of a Palestine. Palestine is a bluff & an ambiguity time to call the bluff.

    • 547. 0 0
      Hey Maria; read your posts
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:09

      You rely on the bible; okay. However, heathens do not rely on the bible, and the heathens involved will settle this one way or the other, without input from the bible UNTIL AND UNLESS Jesus returns. Course Jews know he will not be coming back. So, you preach and excuse us heathens, many of the posters included, for arguing the merits of the claim. The present day Jews have NO claim on the land, none. There may be some whose DNA descendants are from the Holy Land cause Jews and Arabs lived there PRIOR to a large influx from Europe and Russia of folks saying they were Jews. This has to be sorted out. The bible says descendants of Abraham will inherit, for those believing the bible. Descendants refers to a bloodline, not a simple, "hey I am a beneficiary". Let the heathens duke it out and you keep on preaching. Bush is not relying on biblical accounts for his Arab meeting, nope he is not. BTW, Christians say Jews must accept Jesus or perish, so what are you saying here? Regards

    • 546. 0 0
    • 545. 0 0
      a wandering Jew P2
      • TonyL
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:04

      3 Enough of by now `blind & deaf` from both radical Islam scare within & Arab world long standing propaganda finally paying of enough dividends today, EU crowd showing signs it is ready for almost any Arab world `spin & bait`. 4 Another US president`s historic attempt at being the one to democratize ME. once that is achieved, there are ample pretexts could be found at any convenient time in the future to renege on any promises, `dress it up, pull the wool rug over world eyes once again,& try to blow up the gates`.

    • 544. 0 0
      # 518 Peter SM. you are wsting your time ...
      • Kath'
      • 29.03.07
      • 03:04

      Peter hello I said you were wasting your time for the simple reason that this sara(lower case)is not a Jew and we know of the many who come here with spurious names.She difinitely is one of us,otherwise how can one account of her distorted and denigrating posts on the Israeli Governement and what she seems to imply in all the rantings in her posts. I just read one of hers and it was sufficient for me to form an opinion.I don't waste my time reading posts that are false and inacurate. Best wishes and advance Hag Sameach.

    • 543. 0 0
      Hey Bruriah; Paul Harris says there is no god
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:59

      so who did God tell that to, you? Gpd apparently passed by Paul who says he is nonexistent. So, what are you selling and what is Paul selling? Paul says he has rights in the Holy Land as a squatter from Europe/United States, what is your claim?

    • 542. 0 0
      a wndering Jew # 479 P1
      • TonyL
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:59

      Could have not state it any better. It does not take the genius to figure in the nutshell the situation behind the scenes here. Why such a strong push from the Arab world on 02 initiative of all things, 5 years later all of a sudden? So much had changed since then yet the initiative is strictly adhered to word for word with no changes allowed. Because they believe it is time & the best opportunity provided to see through the grand design part of `setting shop at the Israeli gate` with simply bunch of promises & no deeds that otherwise would have had to be insisted on, jeopardizing or greatly postponing the work of the `Israeli suffocating machine`, in addition to their own `Iranian threat` scare that can not wait much longer: 1 The very challenging & ominous for everyone threat from Iran 2 US `graceful` hold or exit strategy in Iraq, if US can persuade the Arab world on her image of an `honest broker` (there is one & only one course of actions US can take in order to do so).

    • 541. 0 0
      #267 Hey Maria; read your post
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:57

      What is up? Got your post; why do you use that cite; there are many sites under Google and I don't know if the Jewish Virtual Library is a reliable unbiased site, but I will look, along with other sites which pop up. Regards.

    • 540. 0 0
      arab peace plan
      • allan feldhammer
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:56

      Now that the Saudis and other Arab countries have embraced a new peace initiative,all Israelis can go home and breathe easier.Jerusalem as the Capital for palestinians,and pre-sixty seven borders. How about the Israelis and the United States initiate their own plan.To the PLO,HAMAS and other terrorist groups.Lay down all your weapons once and for all,or we'll bomb you back to the stone age !Comply within 24 hours.

    • 539. 0 0
      Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • Gina
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:55

      Forgive me for not being clearer .. because the Arab League inherently has no interest in true peace, it is incapable of offering a peace treaty. That was the intent of my post. Have a great day!

    • 538. 0 0
      Deborah -- Seven Years Later
      • Gina
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:51

      Where have you been? The Palestinians could have had peace and a state back in 2000. As soon as the Arabs offer the compromises necessary for the security of the Jewish state, negotiations will take a very favorable turn for the Palestinians.

    • 537. 0 0
      UMMM DUH OF COURSE THEY DO. WHAT'S YOUR POINT??
      • TOVAH
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:44

      they support the destruction of israel. what else is new? who the hell cares what they support. they will never have israel. to hell with them all.

    • 536. 0 0
      #446 Hey Danite; working backwards on the thread
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:42

      Your post doesn't make any sense. What about Farrakhan and what has he to do with gangsta rap? BTW, guess who owns the majority of the record labels producing it? Bingo!!! However, I don't buy any or listen to any, too old.

    • 535. 0 0
      Frenzy caused by fear of peace
      • honestywithoutmercy
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:41

      I'm astonished and amused by the hysterical frenzy of frightened warmongerers rushing out to discredit and dismiss this peace move that is backed unanimously by all the Arab states, apart from that moron Gadaffi. Does this mean the situation is getting a little too hot for comfort for all the racists and warmongerers out here? Are the double-talkers about to be exposed, for saying if they wish for peace with a genuine partner, while actively undermining and discrediting the peace partner at every turn? And what's all this fuss about refugees, someday they will get themselves compensated for what was stolen from them, one way or another. Better injustice is recognized, compensation and a citizenship solution is reached peacefully, than later paying the price in eternal bloodshed, misery and suffering.

    • 534. 0 0
      ballistic
      • Danite
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:41

      barry goldwater and I are two different people.

    • 533. 0 0
      DOUBLE CLICK Einstein et al made it clear they were talking about
      • PETER SM
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:41

      the HERUT part only. "The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism." Where did he say ISRAEL was fascist? Cheap shot,telling the truth,instead of trying to twist somebody else's words would serve your ideology much better.

    • 532. 0 0
      Hey Paul; you are up? I didn't see any posts
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:40

      from you. Have you been packing? The issue here is you and yours stealing an entire country. Any response to that? Don't worry about my employer; he is a-okay and said to tell you to haul arse back to the green line if you wanna stay there. My boyfriend says the same thing; exist within the green line. Yup, they still fly the confederate flag in the South. In SC, there were not too many Jews where I lived and those that were there changed their name, denied they were Jews and talked worse about their own than anybody else. Now, about stealing that country, do you have a UHaul reserved yet, cause I do believe you are gonna live to see that promised land, yup, with your cousins right next door. All aboard!!!

    • 531. 0 0
      #519 Racism and abuse...
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:40

      on both sides. No one is perfect. Don't pat yourself on the back.

    • 530. 0 0
      The Kings are in Court
      • Jason
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:39

      They talk the talk, but look at their actions. They supply billions to fundamentalist madrasas throughout the globe. They enslave their own people. No opposition is tolerated. Just a start. So Israel should deal with these purveyors of peace? Hell NO! These Kingdoms are what should be dismantled. They deserve, their tormented people, deserve no less.

    • 529. 0 0
      #444 Well Danite, how far back are you talking?
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:35

      What I said is that Jews in large numbers financed the slave trade. So what is your question?

    • 528. 0 0
      #498 What would you like to know about
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:34

      Farrakhan? I don't listen to gangsta rap, so I am not sure what question about it I could answer. When did you ask me anything about Farrakhan; I certainly would have answered had I seen it. So, what is it? As far as you and Barry, he only shows up if I show up, yet you are on for other posts and he appears. Coincidental, not hardley. I was off a couple of days and didn't post and I went back and saw not ONE post from the imbecile Barry. Nope, not one, and your writing styles are the same and give it away. Either you and him are posting Fake Ballistics, however, the opinions are so far from any I've posted, I don't even deny many of them, like the one to Yaakov; he knows I would never post anything like that, nope I would not.

    • 527. 0 0
      # 301 barry goldwater. WHAT IS MORE,THE SAUDI COUNTRY IS...
      • Kath'
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:30

      A new one created by the Brits'as usual. It was during Churchil's time that Saudi was established,and is a relatively a new country.They are doing fine,while the oil lasts.Once that dries up,back they go to their tents and camels and become beduin travellers as before of not so long ago. The damn Brits' created Jordan,Kuwait,turned Iraq into a kingdom(was only called mesopotamia).Created Pakistan to the misery for India, and we see the result now. They tried their best with America,but sooner rather than later were pushed out in disgrace. Those Brits'have a lot to answer for. We have Lebanon as well,but that was the French who decided to create it to their discomfiture nowadays no doubt. So,all in all we do not need any Saudi sheiky to tell Israel what to do or accept. he who doesn't like can LUMP IT,AND IT WILL NOT BE ISRAEL.....................

    • 526. 0 0
      Lynn #58 Right of Return
      • wibism
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:29

      why do you think that Palestinians should not go back to the homes from which they were driven by zionists in their lifetime, while allowing Jews who claim they had ancestors who lived in the region three thousand years ago? Certainly Middle Eastern Jews who can trace their families back to Palestine have every right to return, but European Jews have homelands in Europe, and they have less right to live in historic Palestine than do the real semites: the Palestinians. A Jewish state will never survive if it wants to become a democracy. Israel exists, and it is to be hoped it will continue to exist as a state for all its people. No chance of a separate state for Palestinians, since Israel has alresdy stolen most of their land. So it will have to be a single state for all, with a Jewish minority. Israel had lots of chances, and blew them all.

    • 525. 0 0
      # 494 re Farrakhan
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:28

      He had Brother Malcolm killed. He is garbage!! After Malcolm X made his hajj to Mecca he came back changed and challenged the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan's violent teachings. He died because he knew they were wrong.

    • 524. 0 0
      vijaya # 487 That's Fine With Me
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:27

      Howdy Vijaya; You said, "Palestine`s struggles will not have been in vain." That's fine; just keep your sleazo-scumbag, Palestinian, terrorist jerks and all of the so-called Palestinian refugees and their descendants on the Palestinian side of the security barriers until hell freezes over. Selah! --Pharoah Jeff

    • 523. 0 0
      #510 ballistic and Iraq
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:23

      The times are changing and the pendulum is swinging. 43% and climbing in favor of going into Iraq. Gallup and PEW polls today. LOL I TOLD YOU SO. That's twice!!

    • 522. 0 0
      Israel is exposed
      • wibism
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:22

      Israel is starting to panic now that the entire world sees just who is resisting peace. It has always been Israel that squelched any attempts by Palestinians to negotiate a just settlement. There is too much hatred in Israel for "Arabs" and too many zionists who refuse to accept rights for Palestinians, claiming all of the land belongs to Jews by some mythical divine right. One only need read the venom spewed by crazed settlers and their supporters who use violence and racist epithets against Arabs that would never be tolerated if used against Jews. Israel, your ship is about to sail. You better get on board before it's too late. Free Palestine!

    • 521. 0 0
      441 Jeff Northridge it's still petitio principi
      • sara
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:21

      You make up the rules just like your president,as you go along.The rest of the world,especially in the U.N. system go by the Rule of Law. The Human Rights Commission which supervises the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, has found Israel guilty of political assasinations of political opposition figures and a long list of crimes against the political life of the Palestinians of whom the Hamas Movement is an integral part. Why did Hamas declare Jihad against Israel ? Because it knew that it was dealing with a lawless regime since the last 60 years and continuously so to this day. At the end of the day,Israel has become a pariah state in the family of civilised nations.Best for israel to recognise this and move forward and respect the Rule of Law.

    • 520. 0 0
      # 505 Deborah, love the clock noise....
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:17

      Hamas refuses to accept the Arab Plan.

    • 519. 0 0
      274,Mohammed,yes hope will overcome hatred
      • vijaya
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:10

      when I first started reading these talk backs I was shocked by the racism and the abuse and the tunnel vision.You can understand what the Palestinians are up against.But there is hope.If you get past the propaganda and get to read the proper literature the hope will return. I can recommend Dr.Khalid Hroub's Hamas: A Beginner's Guide. Dr.Hroub is writing from Cambridge and although not a Hamas supporter has done a remarkable job of explaining the movement. From these talkbacks you will understand how important it is to inform yourself from reliable sources.Good luck and yes hope will triumph.So will Peace and Jusice.But we have to work for it.

    • 518. 0 0
      SARA.THE GREATEST TERRORISTS IN THE M.E& THE WORLD ARE ISLAMISTS.
      • PETER SM
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:06

      Bangkok,Bali,Baghdad and everywhere else the bombers and decapiators are at work spreading world Jihad. They want to rule it all. At the next meeting of the collective spread the word they can forget Israel,their Islamist charter dreams and get back to doing what they do really well,killing Moslems. How many so far this week?

    • 517. 0 0
      Post #261 - Mark Twain - Zionist Facism
      • Double Click
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:05

      If one choses to cite Mark Twain's comments from 140 years ago, perhaps it's a good time to refer Talkback readers to Albert Einstein's Dec. 4th, 1948 warning in the New York Times, that Israel is creating a Zionist, fascist state in Israel. The URL is: http://www.rense.com/general59/ein.htm How prescient this genius was.

    • 516. 0 0
      471 jeff of northbridge,losing temper,losing argument
      • vijaya
      • 29.03.07
      • 02:01

      Since you are so contemptuous of the General Assembly try the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.art.13,para 2, art,12,para 4 respectively. A word to the wise.When the chips are down and the game is up it won't be even be 10 years for israel, and then is when Israel will come to the General Assembly and the Rule of Law. Now, do hit the books.Ta ta and good night.

    • 515. 0 0
      Translation
      • Colin Wright
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:59

      "But he called the Arab initiative a general concept that has to be developed. He urged the Arabs and Israel to deal with the plan as a starting point in negotiations rather than a take-it-or-leave-it proposal." In other words, the Arabs should make further concessions. Or is Solana holding open the possibility that Israel might give up something more? Kind of academic, anyway. The Israelis may go to a conference or two, but they feel they don't have to make peace, and in the last analysis, they don't really want to. So they won't.

    • 514. 0 0
      #488 Moises; contradiction in my logic?
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:45

      Well, pardon me, I haven't had any dealing with Panama. You better buy the yen, hadn't you. Sorry to hear about all your family issues. Perhaps one day you can afford to make the trip. Do they pay good in Panama? Better for you to wait a bit anyone until things settle down. Hopefully, there will be peace some day in our lifetime. As far as contradiction in my logic; I don't know what you are referring to, however, nobody would give 1 whit about the issues over there if the US, its reputation, blood, and treasure were not tied up in the fiasco in the midst of 1.2b Arabs with potential nuclear war. Congress wants out; voters want out; time to bring ours home. Regards.

    • 513. 0 0
      #458, Gina
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:39

      Hello, Gina, I am not sure how to interpret your post. It is the take it or leave it part that negates this as a peace plan. They are saying that if Israel does not accept this proposal as it is, she will face interminable war. Therefore, the proposal is not really a peace proposal, but an ultimatum. Since the proposal as it stands is not acceptable to Israel, she is put with her back against the wall. Add to this the fact that Hamas and Islamic Jihad are maintaining their previous positions. Add to that the stand on refugees. This is diplomacy with a gun pointed at the head. I am certain that they knew perfectly well when they formulated this plan that it would be impossible for Israel to accept it as is. Regards, Cipora

    • 512. 0 0
      #442 little miss muffet
      • Labhras
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:34

      is getting a little daring Using words such as bla bla.I think I like this new emerging persona.

    • 511. 0 0
      #487 vijaya
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:34

      All the pretty words in the world won't lift the boycott.

    • 510. 0 0
      # 488 Moises
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:31

      You will get there, it's in your heart.

    • 509. 0 0
      Tick, tock, tick, tock..........
      • Deborah
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:30

      ...time is running out. The offer is there and it is now up to Israel to agree if it wants any hope of peace. Israel cannot keep fighting wars, Occupation is immoral and unsustainable and something has to give. Some might foolishly believe that military power can continue to save the day but the world is sick of the backlash from what happens in the Middle East and we want to see a peaceful solution to Israel/Palestine. There is no reason to stall on this proposal, any chance of peace is worth pursuing and the terms are reasonable except to those who want it all their own way and choose war over peace. I want peace for all the children of Israel/Palestine and the surrounding countries and this is the time to press forwards towards that goal.

    • 508. 0 0
      SARA READ ILLAN PAPPES OWN ADMISSION THAT HE "INTERPRETS" HISTORY
      • PETER. S.M
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:30

      to fit in with his(extreme) left wing ideology. Why are there 2 million Israeli Arabs with Parliamentary representation etc.now? If ethnic cleansing was the Israeli policy surely 60 years would be long enough to carry it out. Especially as Israel has beaten the combined Arabs in numerous wars.

    • 507. 0 0
      # 420 Alicia. I READ YOU REPLY JUST NOW..
      • Kath'
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:25

      Alicia Everything you say in this post is something that I hated to hear as I grew up.Since my whole family have been living in Israel I knowledge through them.Ever since as you point with the abandoning the Sinai where so many of our boys died is just one of the many concesions that was made.Why to this day puzzles me.Was it pressure from the U.S? I'll bet it was.Because who else could have been the culprit? That is why I only trust our people and nobody else.Providing our dear leader Olmert does not fall into the trap. This latest is such ludicrous arrangement that it doesn't bear even thinking about! That creepy Solana:What the hell was he there for? The audacity to give advice to the Israelis is beyond belief.I have just finished reading about the whole Saudi family in the "Middle Eastern Quarterly I subscribe and they send me the informative articles.It is unbelievable and I will have to read it. A long and convoluted affair.They are into

    • 506. 0 0
      Ballistic
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:25

      PollingReport.com. March 23-25, 2007. 56% say Iraq a mistake, 43% say not a mistake, Gallup Poll.

    • 505. 0 0
      SARA.THE PALS SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FROM THE UN
      • PETER SM
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:24

      Their elected government refuses in writing to recognise ANY UN resolution concerning peaceful coexistence with Israel. A ROGUE NATION

    • 504. 0 0
      Lakshmi- Come out and say what?
      • Sam
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:23

      That the Palestinians use any terrorist method they can think of - even if it involves sending their own naive people to their death? That they try to fool the Western World with false visions of peace? There, I said it.

    • 503. 0 0
      christa#482
      • Danite
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:22

      Then you are living in the same deluded la la land that your cartoon charatcer hero is in.happy trails.

    • 502. 0 0
      SARA. ARABS A ROGUE NATION.Knocked back the UN & started war
      • PETER SM
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:20

      They started this whole mess by refusing to live in peace side by side as mandated by the UN. Now the Hamas charter specifically excludes the UN or any other negotiated settlement. YOU complain about the UN do not make us laugh.

    • 501. 0 0
      Oh, and "apologizing for the squatters" - I'm not
      • Moises
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:18

      because they are not squatters. They are a proud state called Israel.

    • 500. 0 0
      BARRY GOLDWATER; hey dude, for the
      • tad
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:13

      second time in a few days you are getting your ass kicked by Ballistic. You must be a glutton for punishment. Messing with her is putting all your dirty laundry on the line ain't it? It appears so. You either need reinforcements or let it alone. It is heart breaking to see a man get the mess kicked out of him by a woman. I repeat a few days ago and today man you are no match for ballistic. Better to let that one alone. I am enjoying the back and forth though.

    • 499. 0 0
      # 447 ballistic
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:13

      What site have you ever given to support any statement. Google it yourself, then you might believe me. I don't believe I have made a misstatement to you as of yet. Differences, yes, but never a lie.

    • 498. 0 0
      no ballisitc
      • danite
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:11

      You are confused.barry Goldwater and I are close allies on certain subjects, namely showing up the vicios israel haters like you for what they are.You mentioned Jewish genetics I asked you a question about farahkam and gangsta rap culture, no answer?? You can give it but not take it?TYPICAL

    • 497. 0 0
      Fritz, Right of Return for 20 million Germans?
      • Logician
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:10

      Right of Return for 20 million Germans to their homes in Russia (was E. Prussia), Poland, Czech Republic (was Sudeten) from which they were forcibly removed, AFTER WWII in 1945? There was no such condition put on Poland etc. when they joined the EU. Not even to pay compensation for the land. For well known reasons that apply equally to the Arab side. They not only started the war against Israel but also forced out all Jews from Arab/Moslem countries, with more in numbers and property then Pal refugees (who mostly left due to war threats from Arab armies).

    • 496. 0 0
      455.Lynn
      • KUTW
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:08

      They are very clever. The Arab plan also goes that way: give them all the territories, Gaza and Judea and Samaria, and the right of return, that is to say israel proper.

    • 495. 0 0
      Moises -- off topic
      • Gina
      • 29.03.07
      • 01:05

      Are there no organizations that would sponsor your move to Israel? I find it rather sad that you "missed the boat".

    • 494. 0 0
      Cipora Julianna Kohn # 406 The Arab Ultimatum
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:56

      Howdy Cipora; There have been too many responses on this topic for me read them all much less respond to very many, but I always read your posts. Yes, the "Arab peace initiative" should be called the "Arab ultimatum". The trouble is, I don't know what the "or-else" is. If Israel rejects the Arab ultimatum, then FM Saud al-Faisal threatens that the conflict "goes back into the hands of the lords of war" as if it wasn't there already. I don't think that the Arab League is going to do anything except to provide financial support to the PA as they have been doing all along anyway. Israel should just ignore the Arab ultimatum and continue with the status quo while keeping a close watch on any aggressive moves by the members of the Arab League. I think that their veiled threat is hollow, but they have been incredibly stupid in the past so watch out.

    • 493. 0 0
      # 417 Christa and # 367 Ivo, I sent responses to both of you....
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:55

      ...I hope they will make it through later. Good night.

    • 492. 0 0
      #23 American?
      • * BEN JABO
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:53

      Most people proclaiming that they're "AMERICANS" aren't. Israel has recognized Palestine, it's called JORDAN. Problem is that Arabs want two Palestines, the one they already have and the second that they're trying to steal.

    • 491. 0 0
      peace plan
      • sydney
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:48

      israel is not the occupiers they are the host. and since saudia arabia is so large a land mass maybe the palestinians should move to arabia. let israel have their g-d given land and let the palestinians move to their cousins house (arabia) "viola" PEACE

    • 490. 0 0
      nice
      • s.larmer
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:34

      nice(not)so the arabs agree to live in peace, IF Israel agrees to give up lands won by the spilled blood of other Israels, against the Arabs? and divide Jeusalem into two separate capitals, and/or states? Will this be like East and West Berlin? Both sides guarding the wall? I don't see the Arabs allowing shared rights on the Temple Mount, even though the Israelis have more claim to it, then the Arabs. I thought God gave this land to Abraham and his descendents? Sounds like one for the Arabs(less for Israel)...

    • 489. 0 0
      Permanent Peace??!!
      • Blogowitz
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:33

      How could that be? It is impossible. These Arabs would have had to unamimously rejected the Quran to offer Israel/Jews/Zion/Zionists permanent peace. The entire fabric of their history, teaching, politics, diplomacy, & warfare has been AGAINST the sovereign state of Israel. And, NOW you think they've changed? Good luck. If they didn't burn the Quran, then nothing has changed! Selah!

    • 488. 0 0
      Ballistic #451 - Panama uses US DOLLARS
      • Moises
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:30

      Panama has been using US Dollars since 1903 thank you. That's why many Americans and Canadians are retiring there now. As for why am I worried? We Jews are one people and Israel is our national self-determination after 2000 years of exile. We always worry about our brothers, not to mention that some are related to me. I wanted to make Aliyah, but my grandmother (may she rest in peace) asked me to stay here because they were worried so I 'missed the boat' (my grandmother was dying of cancer at the time) - I don't have the money. Why am I not allowed to care anyway? You don't criticize the Europeans or Arabs on this forum for caring! But then again, given the way you express yourself about Panama, I don't think you seem to be aware of contradictions in your own logic.

    • 487. 0 0
      345 Tamir Gaza,the root and the peace,lovely words
      • vijaya
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:25

      As I wrote to 407 Billy Jack(do read his fine comments) there is a time for everything. Peace and Justice will prevail and Palestine will have played that historic role.Palestine's struggles will not have been in vain.

    • 486. 0 0
      # 443 InTheKnow
      • Lynn
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:22

      Hope they can explain their faux pas. BTW, a little off topic, when the Brits requested the position of their sailors, the co-ordinates which were sent to them by Iran showed they WERE in Iraqi waters. Iran later revised them to show they were in Iranian waters. Clowns!!

    • 485. 0 0
      Equal rights or Apartheit?
      • Fritz
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:19

      Jimmy Carters A-word gets a new meaning. Are some inhabitans of Big-Palestine, call it Big-Israel if you like, better than the others?

    • 484. 0 0
      # 433
      • christa
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:08

      Then the solution is the one-state solution. As a Jew, it may be hard to swallow, but it can finally make everybody happy.

    • 483. 0 0
      to mexican # 236 keep talking until you talk yourself into gettin
      • terornator
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:07

      your mexican ass kicked again.you and your mexican beggers aren't going to get a square inch of us land.it just a matter of time until the individual states make the landlords and business owners responsible for you illegal mexicans and the funny part is, when you have no job,you will be forced to go back to the land you and your mexican brothers have raped and ravaged until there is nothing left.we,the u.s citizens won't even have to pay to have your sorry ass shipped back.were not going to let you scabs come to america and ruin it,like you have your own country.if you guys want american imperalist,come on up and get you some!you bastards come to america and live 20 to a house and expect us to do the same,but it's not going to happen,boy!

    • 482. 0 0
      What about Gaddafi ?
      • christa
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:05

      In fact, I tend to agree with Gaddafi, for once ! He did not attend the riyad meeting. To him, the only solution for the Palestinian cause is the establishment of a two-nationality state called "Isratine".

    • 481. 0 0
      250 ibrahim,about J.Northridge, waiting a repeat of Lebanon
      • lakshmi
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:03

      A rag tag band of guerillas defeated the much vaunted Israeli army. But then,some people never learn.Hizbollah might yet hand them their 6th defeat ! Jeff Northridge thinks Israel will last another 60 years and then what? Living in Peace and Justice is what Israel has still to learn.Maybe,it will take those baby steps at long last since Big Brother is showing signs of dropping his buddy. Stealing Palestinian land,abusing the Arabs,these are the only things that they have learned so far.Not to worry,Time will teach them some lessons.Already has.

    • 480. 0 0
      #441 It is and it should be cause my people
      • ballistic
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:01

      were slaves and your folks weren't. You should be charged with welfare fraud! Fact of the matter is there are MANY MORE Caucasian people on welfare than nonwhite. So, google that bright light! If welfare stopped tomorrow, white folks would be dying and desperate en masse. What have you got against poor white folk?

    • 479. 0 0
      Miss Rice's "song and dance."
      • a wandering Jew
      • 29.03.07
      • 00:01

      Miss Rice implied that a settlement to the Arab/Israeli problem could be achieved before Bush leaves office. This "push" may be the Bush Administrations only chance to save what is left of its "Foreign Policy" and escape from Iraq. A US politician compared it to Nixion's attempt to change relations with China to end the Vietnam War . Hopefully, Israel will not suffer S. Vietnam's fate.

    • 478. 0 0
      arab states have not always welcomed the ...
      • maria
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:59

      palestinians.jordan was the only arab country to welcome the palestinians and grant them citizenship(to this day jordan is the only arab country where palestinians as a group can become citizens).king abdullah(grandfather of late king hussein)considered the palestnian arabs and jordanians ONE PEOPLE.by 1950, he annexed the WEST BANK and FORBADE the use of the term PALESTINE in official documents.after the 1948 war, egypt controlled the gaza strip and its more than 200,000 inhabitants,but refused to allow the palestinians into egypt or permit them to move elsewhere...........the arab states do not want to solve the refugee problem.they want to keep it as an open sore,as an affront to the UN and as a WEAPON against ISRAEL. arab leaders don't care whether the refugees live or die....by RG

    • 477. 0 0
      #440 Hey Lynn; was just reading Yahoo
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:59

      Where did you see this poll, on Fox News? Send me to a cite; if it is Fox, forget it.

    • 476. 0 0
      to barry dirtywater
      • lebanese
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:57

      Stop lying to yourself man, you and your army murdered 1000 civilians, most of all children and women, of course they were some fighters around, hope 1000 israli civilians will die soon, sorry it is awfull but not more than killing an innocent and denying it. You are spreading your hatery with this unhuman acts believe it or not i was not against u before this war, now i just want to see the devastation in your homes. Best wishes

    • 475. 0 0
      #424 Yes, you only lost 100 or so and are still
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:57

      whining about that. Many were lost in those sturdy tanks you had. Course your brave IAF could bomb at will, no friction there. However, Hez was a step up from the Pals, wasn't it, cause your brave IDF rolls in Pal land with tanks and F16s to trounce them. Brave lot you are, yup, brave lot. Kill em from the sky with those gunships, pretty handy in an open air prison. However, Hez gave you lumps, yup, sunk 1 ship and according to Olmert, those tanks being towed smoking were death traps for your soldiers. No water, food; boy, did you plan for that yourself? It wasn't exactly a regular 'let's trounce em' weekend with Hez, huh. So you got frustrated and just leveled all the infrastructure for all the world to see and you wonder why you have no allies except Dubya, yup, not a one (except Micronasia). Biggest PR disaster zionists ever had!

    • 474. 0 0
      Their is a responce to every action.
      • Billy Jack
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:54

      So their lyes the problem.The question than is who did god really talk to,if at all.I remember a preacher telling me god loves you no matter what"as long as you belive in christ".When i read the old testement,it reads like a book void of understanding of the rest of civilization.It is about a small group of people on a small tract of land.It has nothing to do with me,im the gentile the goyim.Yet you want me to march with zionist through the streets of canada in suport of israel.WHY?Who are we to you,do you want from us what you do not give to us.Your understanding of god is not mine.Yet zionists scream for the world to help,based on 2500 year old writeings that talk of god in a burning bush and people living in fish.About a god that would not permit a dog to bark against an israely,but killed the first born man and animal of every egyption.Every story is about how great and loveing god is to the jewish nation.The rest are pagans and goyim.World fillers if you will.

    • 473. 0 0
      386 sam,what's your beef against the palestinians?
      • lakshmi
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:53

      'cos they are trying to get out from under the military boot of the Israelis? why don't you come out and say so ? Then the Palestinians know who they are dealing with.

    • 472. 0 0
      #33
      • Moshe
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:53

      Your view of Hamas as being "a little fanatic" brings into question your pro-Arab bias and views of the happenings of the world around you.You are an ignorant person of questionable lineage, whose understanding of modern Middle Eastern history is limited to the copmic books.

    • 471. 0 0
      vijaya # 395 Mega-Gibberish
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:52

      Howdy Vijaya; I didn't say that all UN resolutions are useless, just UNGARs. UNSCRs are much more serious because they do become part of the body of international law, but even then, there are degrees to UNSCRs depending upon whether they are passed under Chapter 6 or Chapter 7 of the UN Charter. There is no universal "absolute right of return of refugees" declared in UNGAR 194 since it applied only to refugees (both Arab and Jewish) from the Israeli War of Independence of 1948 and it was only suggestive and not mandatory in nature. There are many other paragraphs contained in the nonbinding UNGAR 194 which were rejected or violated by the Arabs including the paragraph concerning the protection of and access to holy places. You still haven't provided me with an international law which provides for a universal "right of return" of refugees from various conflicts around the world. I'm waiting with baited breath for you to produce it.

    • 470. 0 0
      Oh Danite, cut out with the BS; you and Barry are
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:51

      one in the same; same misspellings and misuse of words. Same small letters to start sentences. Cut out with the BS. Now here you are carrying on a conversation with yourself. Say, I will borrow some Prozac and send it on over!

    • 469. 0 0
      #429 I am not surprised about ANY of your rampages
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:49

      over there. Is there anybody in the neighborhood association you and yours haven't trounced? I do believe your general undesirability as neighbors is the stated reason why Arabs want you out, isn't it?

    • 468. 0 0
      # 416 AAA - sorry but your version of reality is yours alone
      • Joe
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:49

      "But Hamas is the problem that blocks progress. " That's laughable but then again, don't let facts get in the way of good propaganda. Where was Hamas 40 years ago? Where was it 30 years ago? Where was Hamas 20 years ago? Where was Hamas 10 years ago? So now they finally win at the ballot box ONE year ago, thanks to Israeli policies and provocations, and it is they who are "blocking progress"? Like I said, this is laughable but I also know the Zionist Zombies follow this line of reasoning--or lack of. First it was Arafat who Zionists used as a panata for decades and now it's "Hamas". This shtick has run it's course, Israel will reap what it sows. It's rejection of peace is an act of war. Israeli's have short memories but it's not our fault many are zombified beyond any recognition. Hamas is not building illegal settlements or occupying Tel-Aviv. Get it? It might one day if Zionists keep up with their madness but as I type this post, ISRAEL IS THE AGRESSOR,OCCUPIER AND UN LAW BREAKER!

    • 467. 0 0
      #431, well, Moises; that sounds like a very "cheap"
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:47

      bargain. Our banks don't accept shekels from Israel or whatever you use in Panama, coffee? How about factoring in blood lost in the madness? Got any price for that? Hey, what are you doing in Panama apologizing for the squatters. Are you squatting over there too? No, Moises, thanks for the offer. We americans will keep on paying Israelis welfare and let our Katrina victims float their own boat. However, if the Israelis returned our total contributions, we could house our own real life victims and then it would make some sense. Why are you worried about Israel from Panama? You can't be too worried or you would be there. Regards.

    • 466. 0 0
      234 double click,with all that the tent dwellers are still around
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:44

      apache helicopters,all the military hardware of a military occupation, bulldozers(one village was rebuilt by the tent dwellers 5 times),siege,starvation,but they are still around. That's what Israel and the 'civilised'suits can't stand.

    • 465. 0 0
      The sounds of true hypocrasy P3
      • TonyL
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:43

      Would several issues be so much of realm of possibility such as: Next, much more massive stage in the emboldened Israeli Arab incitement for some kind of exclusively Arab laws, cessation or autonomy within Israeli proper. So called moderate Arab communities by now standard `practice` of condemnation text & shoulder shrug continue under `out of our jurisdiction` banner if `occasional` terror from the constantly formatting & mutating rogue groups or clans persists. I can go on & on, there is so many clever ways to really renege or simply bypass all the current promises if desired, which I am sure every one the Arab world will try to `dress up` & use to the full extend, the more so the more Israel is betrayed, retreating or suffocating.

    • 464. 0 0
      #436 Yes, you just might, and we will see
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:43

      about our trusted "ally". Will solar power run your planes and tanks needed weekly to trounce the Pals?

    • 463. 0 0
      #440 A just solution is what is needed; BTW
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:40

      Gates says on MSNBC headlines there is little if any likelihood of war with Iran cause US is already in over its head. A just solution is what is needed and I hope will happen. However, a lotta land will need to be unarsed. Regards.

    • 462. 0 0
      The sounds of true hypocrasy P2
      • TonyL
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:39

      If I was to play a devil`s advocate and examined what would have happened had either of the plans materialized. I have no doubt that if Israel had their peace plan go through, they would have been so thrilled there is nothing short of total security breach that would have stopped majority of Israelis & her government on going along or assisting in every possible measure to see the most viable, prosperous Pal state. But I also have no doubt that if Arab initiative came about in its entirety, even with the limited refugee return, the peaceful end solution would have ended right there & then . Would several issues be so much of realm of possibility such as:

    • 461. 0 0
      #21 VIJAYA WHAT ABOUT THE UNTOUCHABLES
      • paul harris
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:39

      ARE THEY NOT SUBJECT TO APARTHEID . WHEN YOU SOLVE THAT CESSPOOL COME AND LECTURE US AGAIN

    • 460. 0 0
      The sounds of true hypocrasy P1
      • TonyL
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:37

      Here is one and only kind of true hypocrisy, the term being thrown so loosely around so many times. We have an Israeli `security barrier` peace, more so set in motion vs. Arab initiative `recognition promises` peace. Both supposedly have in mind identical end result: two nations in peace side by side. The difference between them is the first guarantees Israeli security & Jewish identity because it is firmly in the Israeli grip (I understand an absolute no-no for the Arab world although it does not threaten within the Arab world either the security or majority one iota, except maybe major overhaul to the Arab propaganda machine). Yet it was soundly rejected, violently rejected, & yet everything went on as there was nothing out of the norm. Now only the ` rooted enemies of peace` dare to reject the Arab initiative, although technically other than `maybe yes, maybe no` promises, it does nothing more than allows the Arab world to set off the `time bomb` on the Israeli slow `suffocation`.

    • 459. 0 0
      Sara # 254 I wonder where your from
      • Shepherd
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:34

      Since you come down on Israel, Where do you come from. That may explain your distorted views. Those that post and can't even list their home country makes me want to say your from a Arab country and just posting

    • 458. 0 0
      Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:34

      "Never in history has a peace initiative been presented as an ultimatum' Never in history has the Arab League presented a peace plan.

    • 457. 0 0
      #4087 boy in a hood Harzion/pappabull
      • Labhras
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:33

      flushman/yimri etc. Dot you ever tire of being a pleb/para/site. Regards

    • 456. 0 0
      91 russ don't be so sure about the tent dwellers
      • lakshmi
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:31

      They may outlive you and outlast you.With all your military hardware you haven't been able to defeat them.

    • 455. 0 0
      # 433 KUTW
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:30

      Yes, they surely do. It is the doublespeak that confuses the reality of the situation. They sure as hell can't have both. Economically a disastrous demand on either one. Which is what they are betting on.

    • 454. 0 0
      #142 Hamas is a social services movement not an Organization
      • Lisa
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:30

      "A grenade machine gun is an awesome weapon, but it is inaccurate," he [Israeli Solider] says. "The grenades kill everything within a radius of eight meters, injure anyone within a radius of 16. So, at first you worry about hitting innocent civilians. After a while, you shrug off the worries and get used to it. In the end, you look forward to blasting away." http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070320/lf_nm/palestinians_hebron_dc_1 Israeli army turns West Bank village into training ground "They [Israeli occupation army] should conduct their exercises outside populated areas (instead) of terrorizing a whole village," he said. "We are civilians, we cannot stop them." http://sg.news.yahoo.com/070322/3/47ftf.html

    • 453. 0 0
      Questions.and why Isreal has to be stupid to accept the "peace pl
      • nobody
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:28

      Questions to Arabs? question 1. Does Israel have the right to exist? If no then Israel has to be stupid to give back anything and no more questions. Question 2. If the answer to question 1 is yes then what did the Arabs want in 1948 and 1967? If Israel goes back to 1967 borders then that gives the Arabs a better chance to exterminate the Jews. If you want to say forget about what the Arabs wanted to do in 1967. Then I can just as logically come back and say forget about the 1967 borders.

    • 452. 0 0
      Did anyone mention?
      • InTheKnow
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:27

      That Iran's foreign minister is also participating in this conference?

    • 451. 0 0
      393herzallah,i agree about the Arab initiative
      • lakshmi
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:25

      it's been there since the Beirut initiative of 2002.Israel is stonewalling and Solana is trying to soothe Israel's ego,since even Big Brother is showing signs of wanting to let go and many E.U.countries,nearly 27 of them have made approaches to the Unity Government. I think the game is up for Israel and the sensible thing for Israel to do is take the initiative seriously,and abide by the Rule of Law.

    • 450. 0 0
      ballistic "monthly welfare cheque"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:19

      thought that was the expertise of your lot ballistic. google you may know is one of the benefits bestowed on the world by one of the "you and yours" tribe.

    • 449. 0 0
      Flag Photos
      • Barry
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:18

      Doesn't anybody ever wonder why there are peace demonstrators in Jerusalem waving Israeli flags AND Arab nation flags, while in Arabs countries the Israeli flags are used only for burning and there are no peace demonstrators?

    • 448. 0 0
      barry goldwater#429
      • Danite
      • 28.03.07
      • 23:00

      Indeed a glorious day in history.Thank you for reminding us, and brining to us the joy of that happy event.Regards

    • 447. 0 0
      #418 ballistic still STEALING EMPLOYERS TIME
      • paul harris
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:59

      BALLISTIC I LIVED IN CHARLOTTE NC AT ONE TIME AND THE PICK UP TRUCKS WERE STILL FLYING THE CONFEDERATE FLAG. AS TO SLAVE OWNERS WERE THEY ALL BAD OR JUST THE JEWISH ONES ? B . YOUR STUPIDITY AND SANTI SEMITISM ARE COMPETING IN YOUR HEAD !!

    • 446. 0 0
      ballistic and genetics
      • Danite
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:59

      The what can we infer from the likes of Louis Farakam and gangsta rap culture??

    • 445. 0 0
      Solving the Dual Refugee Problem
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:58

      U.N. Security Council Resolution 242 calls for, among other things, ?a just settlement of the refugee problem.? ?Refugee problem? ? not ?Palestinian refugee problem.? Neither does Resolution 242, the cornerstone of all U.S.-mediated Arab-Israeli diplomacy since its adoption shortly after the 1967 Six-Day War, mention an Arab ?right of return.? That is because its principle authors ? U.S. Undersecretary of State Eugene Rostow, the United Kingdom?s ambassador to the U.N. Lord Carradon, and U.S. Amb. Arthur Goldberg ? recognized a dual refugee problem. Mindful of the events of 1948 and after, they knew any settlement must pertain to both Arab and Jewish refugees.

    • 444. 0 0
      so ballistic are you saying the jews are the source
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:58

      of the problems of your black brethren?

    • 443. 0 0
      Excuse me for asking...
      • DovBer
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:57

      Um....Does anyone else notice that what al- Faisal is saying is at hreat, not an offer of peace. It's noble to want peace, and to champion it. On the other hand it is quite ignoble to turn a blind eye and subject your people to slaughter for the sake of a few handshakes at the next U.N meeting....

    • 442. 0 0
      hey ballistic...and the rest of palestinian supporters in this.
      • maria
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:57

      talkback....palestinians don't own the land-you don't have proofs that they own it.....even the koran doesn't say that they own it......that's why you just bla..bla....

    • 441. 0 0
      sara # 376 Jihad Was Declared
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:56

      Howdy Sara; Look lady, it doesn't make any difference whatsoever if the Palestinian ministers were democratically elected or not. They were all members of Hamas which has declared Jihad on the State of Israel and that makes them enemy combatants since they are part of the command and control structure of an armed hostile force during a period of armed conflict. Just because someone is democratically elected does not exempt them from the rules of war.

    • 440. 0 0
      ballistic
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:56

      According to the PEW Poll, today, "Dubya's" plan for Iraq has an approval rating of 41% by the American populace. They are seeing improvements in Iraq and are looking at it much differently. Still stuck on yesterday and failure, I see. BTW, the Saudis are now asking for a "just solution" to the refugee problem and not the right of return. I guess they don't want to pay for another 5 million or so. It is a lead pipe cinch the US won't be supporting them either. Good luck on that issue. I TOLD YOU SO!!

    • 439. 0 0
      What peace
      • Adrian de Klerk
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:55

      If I were Olmert I'd reject the peace plan as well. No where did they even hint that they woul stop terror attacks and neither did any of them say that they would stop supporting terror attacks against Isreal. Did Syria and Iran say that they would disband hizbolar??? - No Did Lebanon say that they would disolve hizbollar?? - No Basically its all just hot air where the Arab states can wash their hands and say we are guilt free while allow the terror groups to continue their murderous operations.

    • 438. 0 0
      ballistic "a very empirical matter"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:54

      told you you were illiterate ballistic.

    • 437. 0 0
      Who caused the refugee problem?
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:53

      The majority of Palestinian Arabs assigned refugee status fled a war of aggression started by the Arab states and Palestinian Arab ?irregulars.? In going to war the Arabs demonstrated they would rather destroy the Jewish state called for by U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181 (the 1947 Partition Plan) than accept the new Arab state also envisioned. Mahmud Abbas (?Abu Mazen?), Palestinian Authority prime minister in 2003, told an Arabic publication in 1976 that ?the Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons [refugee camps] similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live.? A minority was expelled by Jewish forces. Arabs -- it should be noted that until after the new Jewish state took the name Israel, the adjective Palestinian generally was applied to Jews and Jewish institutions in the Mandate -- fled to Arab countries and Arab-occupied territory. Many never left historic Palestine, ending up in Gaza, the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), and Jordan, all intended after World War I for Great Britain?s Palestine Mandate and Samaria), and Jordan, all intended after World War I for Great Britain?s Palestine Mandate.

    • 436. 0 0
      ballistic and "solar power"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:52

      as it hapens ballistic we are ahead in solar power and have been for years.we may yet rescue your ass.

    • 435. 0 0
      The number of ?refugees?
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:52

      In the mid- to late 1940s ? including the period of the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan, Israel?s 1948 War of Independence, and the 1949 armistice agreements ?between 472,000 and 650,000 Arab refugees left that portion of British Mandatory Palestine that became Israel. The larger figure reflects the difference in the area?s Arab population between the last British and first Israeli censuses; the smaller one was given at the time by the U.N. mediator. More than 50,000 did return, accepted by Israel under family reunification provisions. The Arab states rejected an Israeli offer to negotiate the return of an additional 100,000 because to do so would have implied recognition of the new Jewish state. It should be noted that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, established in 1949 as a temporary measure to see to the welfare of displaced Arabs, counted as "Palestinian Arab refugees" any Arab who had lived in Palestine a minimum of two years.. Transitory workers and migrants inflated the totals ? the decades immediately before the 1948 war had witnessed considerable Arab migration, legal and illegal, into Jewish areas of Palestine. This phenomenon helped explain Arab population growth well beyond rates of natural increase.

    • 434. 0 0
      # 191 person
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:50

      what a hoot!! Unarsing settlements! You go!!

    • 433. 0 0
      There is No Right of Return
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:50

      What the Pals want is a contradiction in its own terms. They want a state of their own and, at the same time, they want to live in Israel.

    • 432. 0 0
      sara...who are the terrorists in the middle east?
      • maria
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:50

      the muslims....most muslims are arabs,aren't they?how can they make peace with the arabs?just the read the HAMAS covenant you'll find out.....there is no doubt that the new wave of attacks in palestine will wipe off this stigma(Israel) from the face of the islamic world...anyboby who recognizes israel will burn in the fire of the islamic nation's fury while any islamic leader who recognizes the zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the islamic world...as the imam(ayatollah khomeini)said, ISRAEL MUST BE WIPED OFF THE MAP...speech by m. ahmadinejad...... arab leaders are terrorists themselves, aren't they?.....al qassam warriors, rain rockets on the settlers!don't let jew sleep!(what a song)even your singers are terrorists, aren't they? ....we will not rest and will not abandon the path of jihad and martyrdom as long as one inch of our land remained in the hands of the jews..by senior hamas leader(2005)...who are the terrorists, sara?

    • 431. 0 0
      Ballistic #392 - I will pay you $13.33, for your Israel tax, OK?
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:49

      ..for somebody who call Jews whiners. Give me your address and I will send you a check for your $13.33 that you paid in taxes to Israel. I am 100% serious. I'm sure you are aware that you can make that much money in one hour of work over there in the US, that is, if you have a job. As for me, I'm 23 and a computer programmer here in Panama City.

    • 430. 0 0
      # 136 Tupac
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:48

      That was then, times change. Bringing up the irrelevent past or history, if you will, doesn't change the here and now. Also, doesn't help the here and now. What people did 30 years ago is a wholly different time. what people did 2,000 years ago is a wholly different time. Try keeping up with the program of today, that is what counts at this point and time.

    • 429. 0 0
      ballistic did i tell you that the iaf beat the syrian air force
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:46

      100 to zero.that is the israeli air force shot down your syrian bosses 100 planes and your slavetraders got none. you may in fact be happy.the syrians shot down two american planes piloted by as it happens blacks.jesse jackson got them off.

    • 428. 0 0
      #383 Well, bright light, google financing of the Nazi's
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:44

      and see what you come up with!!! Do you know how to Google? Well, just type in some key words and behold what will show up. If you are having trouble locating your history, post me and I will send you some cites. Why am I educating you anyway, since you know it all and sound foolish because you know nothing. You have an internet, get busy! I will send you some sites on slavery and Jews, but, they certainly were not to be outdone, nope they were not. However, I am at work to make sure those tax dollars are available to fund your monthly welfare check, so check this site for what will be your tomorrow!

    • 427. 0 0
      ballistic
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:44

      Peace won't be able allowing those who believe it is virtuous to murder your children into your borders. Israel has survived, and thrived, without that illusionary definition of peace. Israel is an amazing country. A miraculous country.

    • 426. 0 0
      barry goldwater#385
      • danite
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:43

      You see the generous welfare state has its uses barry.raise taxes on the top tenth precentile of earners in the US,invest big time in public education and save yourselves and the rest of the world of the "ballistics".it is indeed scarry to see what she belives and the way her mind works isnt it.Regards

    • 425. 0 0
      #390 Well okay Peter, whatever you wish
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:40

      for. Peace will be the King's terms, watch and see. And, if I am right, what are you gonna do about it, from Australia? Regards.

    • 424. 0 0
      ballistic numbers killed in leb war
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:40

      the hizb lost over 800 fighters killed while israel lost about 116 soldiers.so could we go "hand to hand" with your arab bosses?you betcha.

    • 423. 0 0
      To Peter #331
      • Elie
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:39

      I asume from your post that you don't have any peace-plan to offer and don't have any idea how to share the holy-land...thus you are not interested in peace? Living conditions of jews , christians and muslims in theocratic states such as Saudi Arabia or Israel are not the issue. You won't have peace even if the christians or jews would have the same rights in islamic states or the muslims the same rights in Israel!!! The key of the problem is a final solution for the paletinians and the Israelis.

    • 422. 0 0
      #385 Yes, I am so "illiterate" that you concentrate
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:39

      on me, right? The fact that I am far from illiterate is why you DO concentrate on me, except your evidence is a tad short on your positions, just like you are a tad short in recognizing the number of skivvies you need to fill your gym bag!!! Just one of my thoughts would bust your pea brain wide open! Hey, it was great being raised in Pharoah's house; over there at that state institution called Rutgers College, they lay is all out for you, truth and nontruths. Victimhood for you is now genetic. Always deny and never accept responsibility for anything--that is the hewen cry and at this point everybody knows it is genetic. Look at the posts if you disagree. Yup, if you keep up a trait long enough, like victimhood, and raise generation after generation with it, it becomes genetic---a short term evolution! Yup, that is what it has become. High regards.

    • 421. 0 0
      ballistic "you guys couldnt take baltimore"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:37

      could take new orleans pretty easily though.

    • 420. 0 0
      #238 Kath´; I hope you´re right!
      • Alicia
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:36

      Since 1977 as Begin signed peace with Egypt, which cost Israel the Sinai, Israel has been unravelling. In 1982 I watched the ceding of the Sinai to Egypt, which I saw as a HUGE mistake. In 1993 I lived in TA and cried like a water-fall throughout the "live" peace-signing ceremony from Washington. As my hubby returned home, he said to me "let's start packing, they're giving the Land away"! Today the Arabs want to lure Israel to sign his own death-sentence and I feel like screaming, especially since the Israeli leadreship is morally corrupt and rotten to its core; they are like loose cannons, ready to sign anything for a moment of fame in the spotlight as "peace-builders" for a Noble-Peace-Prize! As I see them; they are ready to sell Israel for any personal gain! You bet Kath' I feel hysterical! The more Israel is giving in to the Arabs, the bolder they become. NOR is the Intl.Community pressuring them to keep the signed commitments and act fairly toward Israel! IT SUCKS!

    • 419. 0 0
      Mark of Lewiston
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:34

      Aren't there already agreements of bi weekly talks? Set up by Condi?

    • 418. 0 0
      #388 Well, when I get home I will send it off to you
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:32

      SC is extremely proud of its former slaveowners, yup they are. They were still flying the confederate flag up until a few years ago at the state house until folks made a runkus and then they moved it to the Confederate memorial next to the state house. Yup there were your guys names in black and white. I am at work, but when I get home I will send you to sites to educate you about you and yours and the slave trade! Yup, plenty of government evidence.

    • 417. 0 0
      # 46 Swiss
      • christa
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:31

      Hi. First time I reply to you directly. Hamas is just waiting to see what happens. Happens will climb on the train once it srarts. Because Hamas has no choice. Hamas cannot say no to Saudi Arabia. Because Saudi Arabia has the holy places, the moral authority deriving from them, and the money delivered by their oil. Saudi Arabia has also a strong motivation : keep Iran out as much as possible. All other Arab states are behind Saudi Arabia on this subject. Then I repeat : Hamas will have no choice. As a first step, Hamas can accept the 1967 borders without explicitely recignizing Israel's right to exist. There are other examples in modern history. The 1967 borders are an implicit recognition. And time will do the rest. BTW, has Israel recognized Palestine's right to exist ? Peace.

    • 416. 0 0
      Joe in Ramallah - vocal? yes. majority? no.
      • AAA
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:31

      Polling has repeatedly shown the reverse: a majority of Israelis do support the kind of land-for-peace formula put forward in the Arab League plan. But for 100%, left, center, right, there are two major red line points for such a plan: 1. the "just and agreed" solution to refugees can't mean literal return. 2. a peace deal will have to mean the end of the conflict and the threat of terror against Israel. (i.e. militias will have to disarm or else be disarmed. Any person or party whose continuing actions conflict with the deal need to be imprisoned domestically.) There is room for The Arab Initiative to be consistent with those. But Hamas is the problem that blocks progress. They just said even if they got all the demands of the Arab Initiative, they'd reject the recognition part. Haniyeh abstained from voting. What are the chances they'll go along? And if they don't, will the Palestinians allow them to stand in the way of peace or force them to fall in line?

    • 415. 0 0
      # 355 Tamir Gaza. OF COURSE THEY MADE YOU FAMOUS...
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:29

      Tamir As I said above.The reason they made you famous is because from its initial stages they are the ones who used you as pawns throughout the decades.And the only reason they keep with their stupid agenda it is not OUT OF LOVE FOR YOU,far from it sorry to say!They are greedy and nasty beyond decency. They have been using you for generations to achieve the goal of the annihilation of Israel And that is why you see your brethren in Lebanon,Syria still in refugee camps and not given passports,proper jobs,good homes and all necessary things their indiginous population enjoy. I wouldn't trust them were I in your place. Don't trust any of them.

    • 414. 0 0
      #75 Well, Danite; I would not have used the word
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:28

      "irregardless" in any letter to them as you did, since anyone educated knows there is no such word. Yes, I did write to my Congressman about the issues you raise about nonwhites in prison and whatnot and I received a reply stating the economy would suffer if the problems with dark skinned folks were solved tomorrow; all the poverty pimps with jobs on account of the problems would be unemployed, a good percentage of them you and yours. Therefore, I was told that since the jobs were shipped overseas, that poverty pimping by you and yours was necessary to prevent total economic collapse. Many prison systems in the US are privately run by companies owned by you and yours, did you know that? Now, are you advocating putting them out of work? Never miss an opportunity to make some bucks, right! Right. How many Israelis earn a living watching over Pals imprisoned, kids included, with no charges? Hey Israeli court said you had to buy beds for prisoners; Westerners supply prison beds!

    • 413. 0 0
      re # 389 Kath - Hillel Neuer Speech at UN Human Rights Council
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:28

      This was exactly the theme addressed by Neuer on this speech !!! http://www.unwatch.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=bdKKISNqEmG&b=1313923&ct=3254225

    • 412. 0 0
      ballistic#358
      • Danite
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:28

      two questions.First what the hell does that have to do with my post, secondly what the hell are you talking about?

    • 411. 0 0
      yaacov sullivan so "christian iconography is
      • sainthood
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:26

      homoerotic" wow so who can blame your wayward priests?

    • 410. 0 0
      Jeff Northridge # 361
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:25

      On behalf of the Arabs, I accept. Your post, as always, is very well articulated, and just perfect.

    • 409. 0 0
      What you describe as a call, Yaacov, reality dictates as an order
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:25

      with an implied threat of war. That, is the Saudi version of their 'peace offer', which was parroted by Abu Mazen. I think your past statements towards HAMAS provide sufficient examples to the love and care you offer up to that group, and indeed, your groveling to the Saudis is just what I described. Again, you constantly demand everything from Israel, but nothing from the Arab states. Where is your demand of a 'grand gesture' from them? In truth, its non-existant. As for belief, trust, like many things in life, is earned. To date, neither the Saudis or the Arab League have developed much. And as for HAMAS, none at all.

    • 408. 0 0
      yaacov sullivan but your priests are so expert
      • sainthood
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:24

      in that field.best leave it to them.how many have been jailed exactly sullivan?yours in etc

    • 407. 0 0
      Does wanting to return make you a terrorist?
      • Billy Jack
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:24

      Through the power of the press zionists have waged a propaganda war.Who are they to dictate the terms to their arab brothers.Might is not right.And im sick of zionists saying the land was barron 60 years ago.Lies are not the answer and Force and deception do not validate a god.All this will do is bring the world to a major war.With christians being used as the front line.Even though jewish scholars believe christ to be a teacher not a messiah.So you can see how messed up these religous zealots are.What is the creater really thinking.And whose side is he on.My guess he is talking to some tribe deep in the rain forrest telling them they are better off their then getting involved in this globar war founded on religous hate.But some missionary will change that soon,by force if nessasary.Because the end justifies the means.

    • 406. 0 0
      ARAB LEAGUE ULTIMATUM
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:23

      The Arab League, rather than making an honest offer for a peace initiative to Israel, has sent her an ultimatum. Rather than setting out goals that would then form the basis for diplomatic negotiations, the League has presented the Saudi initiative as a take it or leave it offer. The Leauge, with Saudi Arabia as its host and leader, has told Israel in no uncertain terms that she either accepts the plan or else she is left to face the fate of wars. Never in history has a peace initiative been presented as an ultimatum. This obvious and purposeful humiliation of Israel does not portend well for the future stability of the region. The fates can often be fickle and the future for all unpredictable.

    • 405. 0 0
      #378 Hey Danite; you need to talk to Dubya
      • ballistic`
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:21

      and Cheney about that love of oil. Rest of us are just consumers. Have you contacted AIPAC to have them approach Bush/Cheney to cut off contact with the Arabs? Ah, thought not. Case closed.

    • 404. 0 0
      Well Gabe, I could always lower myself
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:21

      and debate with you. The only problem is, you don't seem to want to debate. Rather, your preference is to insult. That said, my insights are gathered from all over, and I don't need to travel to, or return from, anywhere in order to provide them. You still in law school these days?

    • 403. 0 0
      ballistic did you forget that "you and yours"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:20

      were of immense help to your black brethren in the civil rights movement.some of these "you and yours"were killed while helping your brethren.

    • 402. 0 0
      385
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:19

      At least admit you're completely illiterate. Just read this - you wrote it. Can you not see it's illiterate (note the spelling of this word)? "where did you learn your biology ballistic? the united states has a lot to answer for.keeping you in this illitetate condition is vile."

    • 401. 0 0
      Arabs in cahoots
      • Brod
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:19

      The Arab dark forces are in cahoots with the Saudis as head in crusading their Jihadism to the world. The Saudis are now telling America to get out of Iraq. And they are engineering to reduce Israel to a tiny indefensible country. It is time America and Israel tell the Saudis to go to Hell and drink their own oil. America, Israel and the West must remain strong in confronting the dark threats of Jihadism that they Saudis are crusading around the world.

    • 400. 0 0
      ballistic the arabs whose ass you kiss on a regular basis
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:18

      took 25 million slaves from africa.they killed off the men and took women and children. the europeans took far fewer slaves.but i guess you hate whitey.

    • 399. 0 0
      #221 silly sara quotes a discredited historians writings LOL
      • Ari ben Yisrael
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:17

      I see you are still too embarassed to disclose which rock you crawl out from under to post your lies. Be brave Tell us where you "reside" We won't laugh or tease you. We know it's not your fault!

    • 398. 0 0
      #377 Hey Gina; well, we will all have to
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:16

      wait and see if the peace train picks up the Israelis. You definitively say the Israelis will not do this or that. Do you really think they are in charge of anything? As Haaretz once said on the blog, they are passengers, not a driver. All those fuzzy feelings get an abrupt awakening when the west is talking about no oil. Now, do you think the West is gonna suffer an interruption of oil for their economies cause a few folks living in a place the size of Manhattan wanna keep what is not theirs? Hope you have solar power. Lack of oil and our troubles in the ME will be the weighing factor about who gets what, wait and see, a very empirical matter. Regards.

    • 397. 0 0
      ballistic uses a euphemism "you and yours"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:15

      when she means jews.thats ok ballistic i know.some of your best friends are jews. i wont tell them.

    • 396. 0 0
      re # 270 Umdat as-Salik was a Zionist ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:12

      Sorry !! Interpretation brought not from a "Zionist mithology " but from a medieval sumary o9.16 written bt Umdat as-Salik And let me quote again: "if Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet made a truce with the Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud"

    • 395. 0 0
      318 Jeff Northridge,the right of return
      • vijaya
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:12

      Prior to its admission to the U.N. Israel expressly agreed to the General Assembly Resolution 194(III of 1948) of the absolute right of return of refugees. But ofcourse, Israel has violated all U.N. Resolutions because as you put it they are 'useless.' That is why Israel today is a pariah state.It wants to be a member of the U.N. but will not abide by its Resolutions.You can describe them as you want,but that does not change Israel's culpability. In the 1990s thousands of Crimean Tartars forced out in 1944 were repatriated even though their properties were taken over and in some cases no longer existed.In 1995 Estonia offered to expatriate Baltic Germans expelled by the Nazi-Soviet Agreement of 1939.Yugoslavi another case in point. The position of the General Assembly was that Israel should undertake 'repatriation' as it is called,even before any final peace agreement. Quibbe all you want but the Assembly of Nations has a legal and moral standing.Money,influence,power not enough.

    • 394. 0 0
      barry goldwater #375 - come on man
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:12

      I respect you, but it is not right to make racist comments no matter how many are made against you (us). It should be below you as an intelligent person.

    • 393. 0 0
      Arab states unanimously approve...
      • k.herzallah
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:11

      I wonder if Solana understands english . He urges Arab states to be flexible in their land for peace offer to Israel. The Saudi initiative is so clear: it offers Israel recognition,permanent peace with all arab countries,in return for Israeli withdrawal from lands captured in 1967,setting Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital and just solution to the refugee issue. What Solana suggests,hey arabs ok you recognize Israel and sign peace treaty with it but Israel will tell you from where it intends to withdraw,also Israel will allow the Palestinians to have a banana republic with Rafah its capital and you have the refugees settle in your vast deserts.You arabs have to be flexible you are known to be generous.Whom you are fooling?

    • 392. 0 0
      #365 Yes, Danite, we americans saw our tax
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:10

      dollars at work on the fancy IAF equipment we sent. At least our bombs worked, yup, when you leveled Lebanon out of frustration cause you couldn't go hand to hand with Hez. What a waste of our tax dollars on the IAF cause truth be told, Hez did quite a job without any nifty equipment and large US tax donations. Just as Olmert was announcing how he had knocked out Hez's this and that, US voters live on CNN saw a barrage of 10-13 missiles zoom right over his head. Whoever supplied Hez got more for their dollar than the US got for its dollars. Now the ME footprint is missing its toes, with gangrene setting in on the rest of that foot, yup, gangrene has set in. You guys couldn't take and hold Baltimore, MD!

    • 391. 0 0
      Sara #68, etc.
      • Butch ben Yok
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:09

      Gee, Sara - a bit of Arab bluster and hoo-ha blows a breeze up your skirt and all of a sudden you have the temerity to come out of the woodwork spewing venom about Israel, the true victim of hate-filled morons like you. Dream on... Israel will be around long after the Arab "nations" (mostly fictitious entities created after WWII by the Allies who won, in contrast to Arabs who sided with Hitler) are reduced to the usual infighting bunch of thieves and murderers they've always been.

    • 390. 0 0
      BALLISTIC If you think peace will be on Hamas's terms
      • PETER SM
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:09

      you are sadly mistaken.

    • 389. 0 0
      # 115 Alberto Cohen.re;:sara. IF SHE IS A sara,THEN I'LL EAT MY,,
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:05

      HAT,IF I WAS WEARING ONE. JUST AGITATING AND TRYING TO CONFUSE. Quite frankly there are so many dictatorships and Arabs who have seats in the U.N that do deserve to be thrown out for sure. They rule the "roost" over yonder to the detriment of the good members of the U.N. Were I The General Secretary of the U.N,I would not only rid of them,but NEVER LET THEM IN UNLESS THEY BEHAVE IN A DEMOCRATIC WAY.

    • 388. 0 0
      ballistic "plenty of verifiable evidence that the jews financed
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:04

      the german dictator." lets have it ballistic.i am rather keen to see your evidence.

    • 387. 0 0
      martyrsinnocents and his new alias #357
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:03

      Talk about faded old actresses. Your aliases under which you hide your questionable identiy seem to fade like the sunflower turning from the sun. Let's see: seamus twomey, papalbull, flashman, martyrsinnocents,fagin, among the many.

    • 386. 0 0
      Tamir Gaza- making the Arabs famous
      • Sam
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:03

      You Palestinians make the world believe all Arabs are terrorists. (even the nice ones)

    • 385. 0 0
      ballistic "the jews are stuck in the victim syndrome
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:02

      and now it is genetic" where did you learn your biology ballistic? the united states has a lot to answer for.keeping you in this illitetate condition is vile.

    • 384. 0 0
      martyrsinnocents on fading actresses #357
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:01

      What comes across in all of your postings is an obession with things clerical, homoerotic christian iconography and pedophilia combined with a resentment and scorn toward anything Irish or Catholic. Do rty and stay on track on obsess more on issues at hand, as it were.

    • 383. 0 0
      ballistic re the german dictator
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 22:00

      apart from your claim that the jews financed him there is nothing but a long rambling post.can you make yourself more comprehensible?

    • 382. 0 0
      Hi, Hi, One cannot ask for better enemies than these foolish Jews
      • Jalal
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:59

      They really believe that we want Beace! What do they think, that we have fallen on our heads? Beace is not bart of our vocabulary or Holy Book. We use the word for decebtion only. A Hudna, temborary ceasefire we offer until we drive out all Jews from the Middle East.

    • 381. 0 0
      re # 303 Equal moral values to all ME countries !!
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:58

      Do note, that I was refering to all ME countires - and now, let me add the whole world - and not only to palestinian people !!! As, my perception indeed is, that double standard is applied to Israel in respect to all other countires. Allow me to quote Hillel Neuer at UN Human Rights Council: As of today this Council has now held more Special Sessions to denounce Israel than it has held Regular Sessions concerning everything else in the world. Which raises the obvious question: if the Special Sessions denouncing Israel are more regular than the Regular Sessions concerning everything else in the world, perhaps these definitions ought to be reversed?and the Special Sessions denouncing Israel become the Regular Sessions In respect of your approach to palestinain acts, you should fix a border line !! Otherwise, your message is a green light for all trangessions !!!

    • 380. 0 0
      The Bush Theory of Diplomacy
      • Mark of Lewiston
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:57

      It appears that lots of people on both sides think everything is Bush-style diplomacy. Is every proposal take it or leave it? I don't really think so. I know thew US can be something of a trend setter, but that does not mean that every country has to or does engage in "don't ask, just tell" diplomacy. At some point, somebody has to say, "we can talk." Talking is not a concession.

    • 379. 0 0
      Hi. Having attended the Riyadh meeting I'm here again...
      • Sheik Yer Booti
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:57

      to relay the conversation in the photo: Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani: So you think Olmert will bite the bait this time? President Mubarak: Of course! Hook, line and sinker. President Jalal Talabani: That's right. Just like Bush buys all that we sell.

    • 378. 0 0
      ballistic yes yes we know about your love for saudi oil
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:56

      but are you worried about the inner city blacks who live in poverty and murder each other for a hobby? have you written to american newspapers protesting the condition of american blacks?

    • 377. 0 0
      ballistic
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:55

      Israel is not going to allow millions of hostile Arabs, who belive it is virtious to murder Jewish school children for a martyr's reward, into her borders. By the way, I don't have a right of return to Israel, either. Nice try, however.

    • 376. 0 0
      247 jeff northridge 's rules of war
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:55

      A democratically elected government after an election declared to be free and fair,by international observers.The ministers kidnapped by israel.Rules of war? That's quite a lexicon of words you have strung up there.You decide who an enemy combatant is and then invoke the rules of war.Nice try. It's called petitio principi.

    • 375. 0 0
      ballistic are you worried that so many blacks are doing so badly
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:53

      at school?that so few get to university? why dont the blacks do better?have you written to the new york times?and do you think they would print your illiterate posts?

    • 374. 0 0
      jacob blues and his need for false dichotomies
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:52

      Really, jacob, you can do better than that. "Race to have a group hug with suicide bombers." Now, that is really quite an expansive image. But it is bullshit. Other than your own perceptions you cannot back up such a senitment with anything I have written. "Race to kiss the rear of the Saudis." An even more graphic image. I think if there is any ass kissing being done it is Israel demanding that the entire world kiss its tuchas. But in your world view, even a call for negotiations is a duplictious ruse to "shed more Jewish blood". jacob blues lives in a world where no one is to be believed and the worlst motives are to be assigned to any and all who dare question Israel's ongoing intolerable occupation and theft of land as it chatters about peace.

    • 373. 0 0
      #315 Labhras
      • Boycott
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:51

      It's a Turing test. Anyway, what's the difference between a computer program scanning for key words and then posting a reply from a database, and half the Zionists on these talkbacks who do exactly the same thing with their biological software. In neither case is there any genuine thinking going on!

    • 372. 0 0
      #334 Yes, well, I guess they were not as
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:51

      civilized as you and yours; yours only bred them amongst your family and theirs. Mighty benevolent of you. Course, if you breed them, you don't have to buy them. Say, when I was visiting family in SC, I ran across papers at the Confederate Museum whereby they laid out the names of the slaveholders and the number of slaves and guess what? You and yours were right up top for #s of slaves, not to be outdone by the stupid KKK southerners, yup, right up top; the Goldberg family having the most slaves listed on their balance sheet. How much money did you and yours make on the deal? Now you want to accuse your cousins of outdoing your half of the family. Nope, just like you and yours supported apartheid in SA, you still remain a supporter of apartheid for the Arabs. What I didn't find is ANY evidence you and yours were slaves in Egypt; guess Sadat told the truth on that one when he said it was a lie that Begin's people were ever enslaved in Egypt, nope you were not, liar!

    • 371. 0 0
      Hamas
      • David Burnhill
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:51

      Compromise usually involves all parties giving up a little bit. Hamas is not being ambiguous, they want to take everything back and still not recognize Israel. That is not negotiating and it is certainly not compromising.

    • 370. 0 0
      #242 bruhriah shows signs of life
      • Labhras
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:50

      from Mars. "If your country was taken over by Martians ," Yours already is and they are settled Illegally in the Occupied territories , and headed back to Homesh and you are their "cheerleader."

    • 369. 0 0
      ballistic er
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:50

      what do you feel about the one million blacks in american jails?are you writing to the king of saudi arabia? ballistic are you bothered that so many blacks are executed?out of all proportion to the population.are you writing to your newspapers asking why so many blacks are executed?

    • 368. 0 0
      # 311 Jack
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:49

      Thanks Jack, looks like I have now two Jacks behind my position (one from California and one from London) and one Jack (from Israel) a bit more critical. 2-1 is not a big win, but it's a win....:)

    • 367. 0 0
      Dino #302, 305: I'm exasperated - 2
      • Ivo
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:46

      - you don't just go along w/anything. Enough of folly. You don't just talk, talk. Should the Israelis beg on their knees "please, please be willing to change the stance a little bit"? The Arabs are not dum, they know what they're saying. You ever heard about the Munich agreement, Dino? That was diplomacy, & the West sold out a whole country to the devil, & the whole of Europe for that matter. You also keep repeating the image argument. That's not the first thing. If the media have to misrepresent the ME, something they're good at, you fight the media & through them. By the way, the counteroffer already exists & everybody knows about it. So does a minimum credible offer from the Arab side. & you're right, time doesn't stand still, the Israeli public will move to the right - are you surprised? - & we'll have another war. Just note the order of sequence.

    • 366. 0 0
      Joe in Ramallah
      • rich
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:46

      you are the one who cannot think. we see that arabs cannot even live with each other so what hope is there they they can ever live with us. we see that they think they are being generous by offering us a "peace deal" , how arrogant. arabs have no more right to be in m.east than jews. when we see you behaving in a civilised and intelligent manner we would have more faith in you.

    • 365. 0 0
      ballistic and "the middle east footprint of israel"
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:45

      listen ballistic while you are enjoying your slavery israel's air force has a pretty fancy footprint on the whole middle east. will you never be rid of your slave mentality?

    • 364. 0 0
      #323 Joe in Ramallah
      • Labhras
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:44

      Well said .Too bad (for them eventually) they do not listen. The GiG is up.

    • 363. 0 0
      #301 Yes, I do believe you are correct; after
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:44

      you and yours got finished financing the slave trade to the Americas, it appears that they kept many slaves for themselves, especially in the Southeast. Then what else is your history; well, seems like there is PLENTY of verifiable evidence that you and yours financed Hitler, yup, they did. However, you and yours did not blame yourselves in any way. I guess we are all just "victims", don't you think? Of course, my people got over the "victim" syndrome; yours apparently are stuck in the "victim" syndrome and it is now apparently genetic. What a pity. Say, I saw Heidi Klum the other day and she seems a-okay. I guess she didn't get your messages. What a pity.

    • 362. 0 0
      #171Egyptian
      • dzone
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:44

      I can see that you know history,can you tell me then, since when you(Arabs) are in Egypt?!

    • 361. 0 0
      Yaakov Sullivan # 272 Proposed Counter Proposal
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:42

      Howdy Yaakov; I can't speak for Israel, but I would recommend that Israel respond to the Arab initiative with: 1) The Golan Heights and the Shebaa Farms are separate issues unrelated to the Palestinians and need to treated separately. 2) The border between Israel and the futuristic Islamic Republic of Palestine is to be the path of the security barriers (subject to minor adjustments via future negotiations). 3) Only the predominately Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem are negotiable. The Jewish and Christian quarters, the Western Wall, and the Temple Mount are not negotiable. 4) Absolutely no return of any refugee (either Palestinian or Jewish) to anywhere without express permission of the state in question and compensation for both sets of refugees for their property loses to be made on 1-to-1, pairwise reciprocal basis. 5) All extra-governmental militias are to be disarmed.

    • 360. 0 0
      # 92 Ian.THIS IS TURNING INTO A MAD HOUSE
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:41

      Ian I wouldn't trust any of them,as far as I can throw them.It is reality and should never be forgotten.Never,never!!! The offer/plan is nothing but a poison chalis. I would offer them the same with pleasure. Let them drink of this scrumptious liquid and to blazes the lot of them. Once there there will not be an ANTIDOTE!

    • 359. 0 0
      Hi Kath'
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:40

      Thanks for your encouragement. I am completely in agreement with you - I am only here for the sake of those that are not parties to this conflict, and for other Jews like me. I seriously believe that we have no reason to be angry with anybody for believing what they do because it is futile. As a Jew of strong faith I also believe that nothing can happen against G'ds will - and therefore, it is incumbent upon us Jews and all human beings to better our actions (both towards our Creator and other human beings). Our pursuers here (and everywhere) are only a manifestation of our own shortcomings. Let us make a serious effort to eliminate baseless hatred between us and all people. Regards!

    • 358. 0 0
      #308 Hey Danite/Barry Goldwater
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:39

      Oh Danite, that elusive oil, you know the black gold you were seeking when you leveled Lebanon at Dubya's behest; you were supposed to out Hez and instead Hez outed you and yours as a paper tiger. So goes the world. Well, Bush and his citizens think much more of the oil than you and yours squatting on Pal land. Bandar Bush is part of Dubya's family, in case you have not heard, and when summoned Cheney flew to SA and back in haste to carry a message. Peace or no oil!! Yup, that was the message. Now tell me, if Dubya is given a choice between the two after you and yours flubbed up Lebanon, and the fiasco in Lebanon which Arabs told him he cannot leave; with Congress and voters on his back, what will his choice be, giant brain? Ah, thought so!

    • 357. 0 0
      yaakov sullivan's occupation with israel
      • martyrsinnocents
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:39

      sullivan we all have to have occupations.ours is to "occupy " the arabs and yours presumably is to be a faded old actress. yours in etc

    • 356. 0 0
      No peace
      • Jim
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:38

      There is no such thing as peace with a Jew. They all must be killed because Allah demands their blood.

    • 355. 0 0
      We Palestinians make the Arab famous
      • Tamir Gaza
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:38

      Many people never heard of Saudia Arabia, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, Morocco.

    • 354. 0 0
      On just one more - 336
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:37

      What was I saying about these sick pathetic people not being able to resist capital letters: "WE need to live Free in Our country except the Arabs of Israel (Aravim Shelanu) will not allow that nor will the Arabs of YESHA, in a different way. NOW WE HAVE SAUDI ARABIA AND THE ARAB LEUGUE CHIMING IN.1948 ALL OVER."

    • 353. 0 0
      To Egyptian
      • Jack
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:37

      You really ought to get your facts right. Are you actually saying that Israel attacked Egypt, Syria, Jordan etc. the moment the state was declared ? Ludicrous. Were the Palestinian refugees ever given the choice of either integrating in the neighbouring Arab countries or remaining in the camps ? No, they weren't. If partition had been accepted in 1948, there would have been a natural exchange of population, as it happened when Pakistan was born. Are there any refugee camps left over there ?

    • 352. 0 0
      Saudi Peace initiative
      • Richard Studnicki
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:36

      Will the Israeli population ever understand that the occupation of the West Bank and the Gasa Strip were one of the biggest disasters to the State of Israel? a disaster brought a demoralisation of its population and of its soldiers and the belief in the superiority of the race. As an Isreli I pray that the wisdom will come to my people ever, and that they choose a government strong enough to stand up and say we made a mistake, let's fix it. Richard Studnicki

    • 351. 0 0
      COMPASSION
      • GABE1
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:35

      The world has compassion for murderers, rapists and child molesters, we have more of them NOW in every DEMOCRATIC country save and except Muslim Democracies. That phenomenon is a Leftist, OINKmanist experiment of the 1960s, results speak for themselves. Compassion for anyone that cannot return that compassion is a fools paradise . The Oslo Agreement is responsible for more deaths than the previous state of war and brought a FALSE HOPE of Being able to live in Peace and Security. Israels wanted to see something that was non-existant and continues with this false hope OF THE SAUDI PLAN.The more the Oslo agreement failed the more do the Leftists want to save it. As a result we put ourselves more and more in harms way. The Genocidal terrorists and their ever supporting population does not want compassion:THEY WANT ISRAEL JUDENREIN.But Compassionate Leftists and OINKmanists just want Israels annihilation in a COMPASSIONATE WAY.ALL IN THE NAME OF COMPASSION.

    • 350. 0 0
      #321 Hey Gina; what makes you think
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:35

      you and yours will have a final say, or any say, in the ROR? What right of return did you have? er, None. Regards.

    • 349. 0 0
      Why Haaretz is showing the Iraqi Jalal Talabani picture?
      • Tamir Gaza
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:34

      Is he important and his country important for us? The cermoney is about Israel and Palestine.

    • 348. 0 0
      JOHNBOY Just read Moises#174and inigo montoya#194
      • PETER SM
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:34

      I find your postings which include selective quotes,straight out ignorance stated as fact, hypothesis becoming fact and secret agreements and unwritten agreements to which you are party to,difficult to take seriously.

    • 347. 0 0
    • 346. 0 0
      Just one more - 331
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:33

      Christians seem to live in peace in Syria. They seem to be leaving Jerusalem in droves.

    • 345. 0 0
      Most of the talk in the Arab cermoney is about Palestine
      • Tamir Gaza
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:32

      We are the root and we are the peace of the Middle East.

    • 344. 0 0
      # 85 The Equilizer. LOVE SEEING YOU HERE. YOU ARE THE VALIUM TO
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:31

      US JEWS HERE AT ALL TIMES. Ham-ass can go and get some indoctrination that does not follow the "Muslim Brotherhood Charter"If they can manage that,there might be some glimmer to contemplate and thus talk about. Sadly there is not a chance in hell that will will happen and thus will continue to shoot themselves in the foot EVERY BLOOMING TIME. P/S That is an english expression........

    • 343. 0 0
      Dino #302, 305: I'm exasperated -
      • Ivo
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:31

      First, I didn't mean to call you a fool on the former posting. The word "long" in "how long" was left out by mistake & it was a general question. But you're not paying attention. What do you think it means that "Israel must accept the initial offer first"? The A.League is insisting on it & they're not gonna change it. It means dialogue is not possible, they're not inviting to dialogue & to come w/a counteroffer already means (to them) that further talk is not possible. If Israel said "yes, we agree to a Pal.state in Gaza & the W.Bank, but we insist on these 3 new huge settlements in the heart of the W.Bank in addition to the existing ones, & you must accept this offer before we start talking, no way around it" (this is the equivalent of the Arab offer), you think the A.League would come talking? You're putting the entire weight of responsibility on Israel's shoulders, all the pretty words about dialogue etc sound rather empty & cliche, sorry. Here in this environment you - cont.

    • 342. 0 0
      More pro-Israeli racist filth - 326
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:29

      "ballistic do you know what the arabs did to the cajones of your black brethren? they cut them off.they wanted eunuchs to look after their women.so bush is doing ok." This is a sad hate-filled little forum. Ciao!

    • 341. 0 0
      Once again, Yaacov stabs the Jews while coddling the terrorists
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:28

      Yaacov stated "Israel and the Palestinians are not equal players. Israel is an occupier, an occupier that has entrenched its occupation for 40 yrs. It must be held to a different standard as an occupier." Just another one-sided view of a two-party conflict Yaacov. You race to have a group hug with the suicide bombers, race to kiss the rears of the Saudi's and those that for the same 40 years, so willing to see Jewish blood spilled, but Jews, nope, not worth your time.

    • 340. 0 0
      WELCOME BACK JACOB BLUES
      • GABE1
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:27

      I see you are fresh back from Israel with New Insights. Did you hook up with Whodey while there? Nothing changes and you are still doing battles with that idiot Yacoub Sulleiman. what does that say for your intelligence? Not much I am afraid.

    • 339. 0 0
      Joe in Ramallah
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:27

      "If you don`t kill US ALL," That's the work of your beloved terrorists. Too bad you all don't have the moral fibre to arrest your own murderers, criminals, and terrorists, and free your society from these guys. But no, just like you've stated previously, you're behind them 100 percent, correct? Esp charming has been Hamas' gunbattles in front of Palestinian elementary schools.

    • 338. 0 0
      ballistic a reminder
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:25

      it was the europeans in the form of william wilberforce who abolished slavery.whitey was good to you.the arabs were beastly to the blacks.

    • 337. 0 0
      same shit, different day....don't you agree????
      • LG
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:24

      Lets see....return to '67 borders would mean for Israel to become vulnerable to aggression at any second..... return of so called refugees would mean Jews will become minority in their own country... and as for Jerusalem- well, well, don't they know by now that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.. So what kind of plan is there??? same shit, different day....don't you agree????

    • 336. 0 0
      Living free
      • GABE1
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:24

      WE need to live Free in Our country except the Arabs of Israel (Aravim Shelanu) will not allow that nor will the Arabs of YESHA, in a different way. NOW WE HAVE SAUDI ARABIA AND THE ARAB LEUGUE CHIMING IN.1948 ALL OVER. There is nothing that we can say that will change that. They want to annihilate us and have only adapted another Tactic. Bleed us from outside and destroy us from within.Supposedly intelligent Jews do not want to understand that not see that.Blinded by International Leftist philosophy. Israelis that have nowhere to go will pay the price in dead, maimed and even in the dismantling of the Jewish State with the sure massacres by Arabs to follow.Talk about Self hating Jews.

    • 335. 0 0
      Lee - 317
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:23

      Are you really saying Israel is keen to give up settlements like Ariel. Come on, you're insulting our intelligence.

    • 334. 0 0
      ballistic "european population smack dab in the
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:23

      middle of the arabs." but ballistic the europeans took far fewer slaves then the arabs.they also treated them far better and what is best of all they kept their cajones intact.no harems in europe.

    • 333. 0 0
      War and Peace
      • Baz Mann
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:22

      The Arabs unanimously approve the Saudi peace plan, meanwhile, Ashkenazi hints about going to war in Gaza. What's wrong with this picture?

    • 332. 0 0
      Right of return
      • Paul
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:22

      Nobody can remove the right of return of any refugee or descendant of refugee from a war zone. This is not negotiable. If an individual (because parent's can't sign for unborn kids even)is willing to forego this right for compensation the right is not removed from others. Anyway, not so many Israeli's I've spoken with think peace with Israel is possible, it goes against Israel's creation myth. Good luck with that aparteid thingi.

    • 331. 0 0
      #307 Elie
      • Peter
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:21

      The call would obviously go to the Israelis. Israel, the Jewish state is antecedant to the multitude of Islamic states in the ME ruled by Islamic Law. Arabs living in Israel would have similar rights as Jews living in islamic states. When there is a relaxation of the severe restrictions to jews, christians, or any non muslim living in Islamic states, there could be corresponding concessions to arabs living in Israel. Have a problem with that? Regards.

    • 330. 0 0
      Tzfonit/Bracha-Nonsense
      • GABE1
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:21

      Typical Arabist NONSENSE.You are so deluded that your eyes must be brown.... "Both sides are going to have to be prepared to compromise even red line issues such as Jerusalem, the refugees, and recognition of Israel. Entering negotiations with one`s mind made up already negates the whole purpose." I have a much better compromise that even you may like. We pack you and the rest of the fre...hot and ship you of to your lovers, the Arabs in Jordan. You may even become a second Z...ona shel Aravim as Tali Fahima is.You are Jewish and Zionist. MY Foot.

    • 329. 0 0
      The stupid person in the picture, rising Leb flag
      • Tamir Gaza
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:21

      As the gate to peace and calm is through Lebanon. All the way to happy life is through Palestine state with its capital East Jerusalem.

    • 328. 0 0
      Alicia-Freeze
      • Gabe1
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:19

      You have to understand that Bracha is a DYED in the Wool Arabist and her interpretation idea of security must be looked at from this standpoint. She has no problem with being a Dhimmi in a Muslim Israel. She has no problem in selling Israel to the Lowest bidder. She has no problem with Expulsion as long as it is the Jews being Expelled. She is however very protective of her Home even if it is a former Arab Village.

    • 327. 0 0
      Oh, Dutch #294 Better late than never. Why so late? They accepted
      • People of the World
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:18

      Saudi plan without you. Be vigilant, Dear Doris. Our subtle world needs your close supervision. We, People of the World, really could tell (as you suggested) "OUT! NOW! WOW!" But we decided to wait: Before telling these sacred words we should be absolutely sure "TO WHOM" to address. The best wishes to you, Doris Dutch. Don't forget medication. And Walking, Walking, Walking. Regards. People of the World

    • 326. 0 0
      ballistic and cajones
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:17

      ballistic do you know what the arabs did to the cajones of your black brethren? they cut them off.they wanted eunuchs to look after their women.so bush is doing ok.

    • 325. 0 0
      314 - Anti-Semitism
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:15

      Read this filth. And we're constantly told that antis-semitism is such a problem in the world... Ali Baba muslims hordes of fraud (theft by deception) , theft is a major crime encompassing offences such as burglary, embezzlement, larceny, looting, robbery, trespassing, shoplifting, intrusion ,and sometimes criminal conversion. Alatif , alatif Geama`at mulat al khtif , = Alas , woe to Ryadh`s thieves gathering , a distinct muslims stench "that begins in Nouakchott and ends in Indonesia" centered in Ryadh , coincidence symbolised by Gaza uuufffff sea/flood sewage yesterday collapse , Saudia known as guardian of Islam , a mohamed legacy to his muslims followers whom as death idolatres praise suicide bombers guided by a 72 years old virgin`s principal of martyrdom schools of thought-operations , Go ahead Al Jazeera , spotlights on Ali Baba muslims hordes of fraud Ryadh`s thieves gathering ,

    • 324. 0 0
      jacob blues and his castels in the sky #285
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:14

      1. Gaza. A unilateral move by Sharon that was nothing more than a redeployment. The illegal colonists should never have been there in the first place. They were moved out, which should have occured yrs before. They were compensated. End of story. hardly one major step for peace. What they gave up in Gaza, the grab in WB. 2.I dont give a tinkers damn what the kine of Kadima was. The facts on the groud is that not one illegal squatters camp has been taken down, colonies have been expanded, new ones planned and dismantled ones repopulated by the squatters. 3. Qaasams fall and the occupation and its draconian measures against not a town or village but a whole population continue. Thats a form of state terrorism. Deal with that. The Temple Mount excavation is a provocation and must be supervised by international monitors. It is a creeping attempt to annex the entire Temple Mount and end muslim control there. So much for Israel's longing for peace over control and dominance.

    • 323. 0 0
      If Jewish attitude towards PEACE is reflected by posters here
      • Joe
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:13

      I can tell you this bunch is aiming for Armageddon and nothing less will do. I'm always amused by the rejectionsts in the Zionist camp, who are a vocal majority, and I really don't believe they get it. What are Jews rejecting? Rejecting end of occupation? Rejecting end of settlement expansion? Rejecting giving back stolen land? Rejecting Israel withdraws to 67 border, abide by UN resolutions and deal with refugee matter in a just way? Such enlightened positions but it is the Palestinians who will get the last laugh. If you don't kill US ALL, absent of a just peace, all Zionists are doing is pissing off alot of people who when the tables are turned--and if anyone doubts they will, read Jewish history, and so how insane is it for Zionists to continue marching towards their self-destruction with eyes WIDE open. An entire people blind to truth and reality. Have no pity on a "state" that rejects peace. This opportunity to make peace with ALL Arab states will not come again.

    • 322. 0 0
      The end
      • Pedro
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:13

      This plan means the end of Israel. Israel will become the suicide bomb paradise.

    • 321. 0 0
      ballistic -- of course I'm correct
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:12

      The filthy intifada, blowing up their own children, throwing parties for the dead, exploded, worthless to the parents' human bomb children, was much more preferable to the Palestinians than accepting a state back in 2000. Now we shall see if the Palestinians are going to continue stateless for another 60 years, or if they'll choose to give up their demands for the non-negotiable "right of return".

    • 320. 0 0
      Lee - 313
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:12

      You show touching faith in UN votes on that one occasion. And all the others...?

    • 319. 0 0
      AMBIGUITY WORKS: Abbas - in favor, Haniyeh - abstained.
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:07

      Now we will see how works FLEXIBILITY(?)

    • 318. 0 0
      vijaya # 246 What Absolute Right?
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 21:01

      Howdy Vijaya; I was not talking about the Jewish refugees caused by WW II but about the appoximately 860,000 Jewish refugees who were forcibly expelled (with property loss) from various Arab countries and from Arab controlled areas such as the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip between the years 1948 and 1967. You said, "The right of return is an absolute right in International Law." It is? You show me the law that you're referring to and don't bring up some useless UNGAR either (UNGAR's are nonbinding and unenforceable and are not part of the body of international law). I think that the UN Charter mentions the desirability of refugees being able to be repatriated after a conflict, but it is not mandatory. A case in point is the breakup of the British Raj. How many Hindus have been able to return to Pakistan and Bangladesh? How many Muslims have been able to return to India? And there were millions of each. There is no such thing as a "right of return".

    • 317. 0 0
      To Sara
      • Lee
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:59

      Sara - Israel would have given back the territories years ago if it could have received assurances of real peace. Sadat took the step of making peace with Israel (a peace that cost him his life), and Israel gave back the Sinai. If the other Arab countries had shown the same spirit of reconciliation, Israel wouldn't have the occupied territories today.

    • 316. 0 0
      Hi Danite...
      • Ibrahim
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:57

      I apologize for calling you a chump....kay??? I just don't have a lot of patience for the western-elite-neo-liberal mentality that you often times show in your posts. Your posts to your right wing neo-facist Jews who use the Old Testament like a real estate document are far more toleratable... I know you are all for an end to the Israeli Occupation and for that I call you an ally, a partner in peace, even though we rarely see eye to eye on nuts and bolts... BTW, I deplore Hamas' rigid politics...and I believe they should offer conditional recognition of Israel within FIXED borders. Take Care.

    • 315. 0 0
      #281 Boycott re bruhriah RAM
      • Labhras
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:54

      Hi Boycott. Her programmer must have gotten hold of a "Resume "scanning program and changed the Buzz words with perhaps, Right of return, Palestinian Homeland, Refugees, expulsion,Equality.And so on and so on.

    • 314. 0 0
      Arabs States approval of Saudia initiative equal
      • Joseph E .
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:50

      Ali Baba muslims hordes of fraud (theft by deception) , theft is a major crime encompassing offences such as burglary, embezzlement, larceny, looting, robbery, trespassing, shoplifting, intrusion ,and sometimes criminal conversion. Alatif , alatif Geama'at mulat al khtif , = Alas , woe to Ryadh's thieves gathering , a distinct muslims stench "that begins in Nouakchott and ends in Indonesia" centered in Ryadh , coincidence symbolised by Gaza uuufffff sea/flood sewage yesterday collapse , Saudia known as guardian of Islam , a mohamed legacy to his muslims followers whom as death idolatres praise suicide bombers guided by a 72 years old virgin's principal of martyrdom schools of thought-operations , Go ahead Al Jazeera , spotlights on Ali Baba muslims hordes of fraud Ryadh's thieves gathering ,

    • 313. 0 0
      To Indrajaya re 66
      • Lee
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:50

      Indrajaya - Everyone knows that the so-called "Right of Return" is a recipe for the destruction of Israel. It is simply a non-starter. If the Arabs had accepted the 1947 partition plan, there wouldn't have been a war of independence and, therefore, a refugee program. And if their Arab brethren had absorbed them rather than coop them up in refugee camps for all these years (using them as something akin to human poker chips), there wouldn't be a refugee problem. If there is ever to be peace, the Arabs will have to give up this "right." That's just the way it is. We believe that Palestinians have a right to self-determination in an independent Palestinian state. We also believe that Jews deserve the same right. So did the majority of the countries of the world when they voted for partition. If they didn't want an Israel to exist, they had an opportunity to vote the other way. They didn't and the rest is history. They world will just have to live with that, I'm afraid.

    • 312. 0 0
      Post 278 Your scepticism about Poll
      • Leo Scheiner
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:50

      It is on Jpost website. More details there. Americans oppose giving land to Palestinians by a margin of five to one, according to a new poll conducted by McLaughlin & Associates for the Zionist Organization of America. To the question, "In your opinion, should Israel give more land to the Palestinians?" 60 percent of Americans rejected ceding land while 11% favored it.

    • 311. 0 0
      To Swiss Dino
      • Jack
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:49

      Totally agree with your views regarding the response to the Arab plan. Well said.

    • 310. 0 0
      A serious peace plan
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:45

      Pro-Israelis: What would a serious peace plan consist of in your opinion? Don't just crap about cessation of terrorism - virtually the whole world now realises that terrorism is a two faced monster: Israeli terrorism against civilians, Palestinian terrorism against civilians. One pro-Israeli had the efforontery to say "this is not about land". What a joke! If Israel returned to 1967 borders and built a big wall around itself I think most people in the world would be happy.

    • 309. 0 0
      back to1967
      • Moshe
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:44

      Today Israel makes a deal with Saudi Arabia, tommorow Iran takes over Saudi Arabia,For sure its going to happen.Whats going to happen to the wonderfull peace deal? Israel can kiss it good bye.No Israel is not that stupid may be Olmert is.

    • 308. 0 0
      ballistic you also love the saudis
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:43

      you are always the king this and the king that.and now you ask us if we have oil.so ballistic are you also a slave to oil?

    • 307. 0 0
      To Peter #242
      • Elie
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:43

      Peter,since you are in NY, do the arabs have to call the americans or the israelis? Some corrections on you statements. The proposal is an Arab proposal and not an Islamic proposal. I hope you know the difference. If you don't agree with the arab proposal ,and if you do want peace in the ME, so please put forward a new and just peace-plan how palestinians and Israelis can share the Holy Land .

    • 306. 0 0
      #220 Hey Gina; you may or may not be right
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:43

      about 2,000, however, better late than never. Besides, in 2000 was planning for a large ME footprint with Israel as the vanguard over all that wonderful oil. Dubya was gonna whack Saddam, use you and yours to go through Lebanon to the pearl of the ME, Iran, and get Afghanistan away from the Taliban. Yup, that was his stated plan. However, while he was planning, God was planning and as a result the ME footprint of Israel is now missing its toes and US looking for an out with a broken military. Sometimes circumstances make a monkey eat red pepper and Bush is munching. Both houses of Congress vote to end war; we will see if a Bush veto can be overriden.

    • 305. 0 0
      # 240 Ivo (2)
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:41

      Bottomline: Israel has to become (much) more diplomaticly active and positive. If this thing is dragging on for another couple of years, people will associate the name Israel more and more with something suspicious, negative. And that can be neither in the interest of Israelis nor the Jewish people living in the Diaspora.

    • 304. 0 0
      The Saudi Summit a repetition of Versaille-Peace-Treaty in 1918
      • Alicia
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:37

      ...where the Peace-terms (after the IWW) were dictated to Germany, who was delibarately left out! Germany was humiliated! Nothing good came out of it as we know today. Do the Arabs believe they can ignore Israel and at the same time impose THEIR peace-terms on Israel! Talking about ARROGANCE taken to its most extreme!

    • 303. 0 0
      Mr. Cohen, equal demands between equal players #289
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:34

      Israel and the Palestinians are not equal players. Israel is an occupier, an occupier that has entrenched its occupation for 40 yrs. It must be held to a different standard as an occupier.

    • 302. 0 0
      # 240 Ivo (1) Just sitting back is not enough......
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:34

      Ivo, of course Israel can't accept the Saudi plan as it has been presented now, and the Arab League would be well advised, to soften its tone a little bit. However, just sitting back and ignoring the whole thing is also not enough for Israel to do. As I stated earlier, either she makes a credible counter-offer and a real dialogue starts, or Israel must present an own comprehen- sive peace offer to the Arabs. But the status quo is an absolute (PR) disaster for Israel. I will give you an example: Yesterday the most important newspaper in Switzerland had as title : "Arab League renewing its offer for peace in exchange for land to Israel". Tomorrow there will most probably be the head- line: "Israel rejecting or at least ignoring the Arab league" offer. What should the average Swiss (European) reader think about that? Note, the vast majority of Swiss people are no ME insiders, they probab- ly read the headline and a bit of the text, and that's about it.

    • 301. 0 0
      ballistic the king's father was a big slaveowner
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:33

      the saudi king had thousands of slaves.it looks like the kings sons also have a slave in henderson.

    • 300. 0 0
      Yaacov Sullivan still propping HAMAS up on a pedestal
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:33

      Yaacov continues to softball HAMAS words and deeds. "Hamas is being hard nosed, but Israel must propose something to see how they will move.Hamas is a segment of the PA.Even if they remain intransigent in their position, there is a whole Arab world that is open to alte" After a year and a half in power, Yaacov's "objectionists" have reiterated the group's philosophy that 'resistance (terrorism) is a right', that there will be no peace with Israel, and that in the end, it plans to claim all of Israel and replace it with an Islamic state. This comes AFTER Israel withdrew from Gaza and elected Kadima. 18 months ago, Yaacov begged everyone to kow-tow to HAMAS, saying that we should be patient and wait to see what they say and do. Now, we have seen what they say and do, and we're still told to be patient, and give them more. At a certain point Yaacov, we see the emperor without his clothes for what he is.

    • 299. 0 0
      Yaacov Sullivan still propping HAMAS up on a pedestal
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:33

      Yaacov continues to softball HAMAS words and deeds. "Hamas is being hard nosed, but Israel must propose something to see how they will move.Hamas is a segment of the PA.Even if they remain intransigent in their position, there is a whole Arab world that is open to alte" After a year and a half in power, Yaacov's "objectionists" have reiterated the group's philosophy that 'resistance (terrorism) is a right', that there will be no peace with Israel, and that in the end, it plans to claim all of Israel and replace it with an Islamic state. This comes AFTER Israel withdrew from Gaza and elected Kadima. 18 months ago, Yaacov begged everyone to kow-tow to HAMAS, saying that we should be patient and wait to see what they say and do. Now, we have seen what they say and do, and we're still told to be patient, and give them more. At a certain point Yaacov, we see the emperor without his clothes for what he is.

    • 298. 0 0
      #211 Destroy their wealth? Whatever are you
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:33

      talking about? Oil can be sold anywhere, ie China, with no dog in the fight. I think this proposal will make it through, yup, cause what is promised is too extensive and sought after to allow Israel to just keep saying, "nope, nope". Look what has happened in a very short time; boycott fell apart in a few weeks, money to Pals, talking to Pals; Condi back with more. If Israel rejects any offer of peace, then int'l community will recognize her for what she is, naysayer squatters smack dab in the middle of the Arab world now home to a large European population which relocated itself with no ties to the land. Doesn't matter how you spin it, that is the bottom line. Very few Jewish refugees can produce individual legitimate claims, but rather lump it all together saying, "we are all Jews" and land is promised to "us". The indigenous Pal and Jewish people there 60 yrs ago have rights superior to newcomers, including would be relatives. Period. Regards.

    • 297. 0 0
      #205 Terrorist Ministers
      • ScotGuy
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:27

      Hamas is not a political party it is an armed terrorist militia trying to pose as a party. It is in their charter to destroy Israel, and they are standing firm on this principle. They chose war against Israel. Destruction of Israel by all means possible. Allthough they are absolutely inept to govern, the Palestinian people took the sad decision to elect them, and are suffering from their terrible mistake. The Israeli government has the duty to imprison them in order prevent them from commiting crimes in Israel. As for the crimes they commit in the Palestinian territories this is Mahmoud Abas's tough duty.

    • 296. 0 0
      Chris Linthwaite
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:26

      Bin Laden could care less for the Palestinians. The Muslim community I know here in LA despise England with every fibre of their being, justify terrorists bombing attacks on London, believe it was the UK responsible for 9/11, and hate England because of the mass population transfers between India and Pakistan. You're delusional if you believe a peace treaty between Arabs and Palestinians is going to keep the UK safe.

    • 295. 0 0
      289.JW:You ask "Why should Arabs be flexible?"-TO TALK TO SOLANA
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:25

      FLEXIBLE,...TO TALK TO AMBIGOUS HANIYEH. It is very simple: Without FLEXIBILITY you cannot resolve AMBIGUITY.

    • 294. 0 0
      The EU should have advised --OUT NOW!
      • Dutch
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:24

      How shameful of the EU telling the Saudis to be flexible with the Israelis. After almost 40 years of a military occupation and almost 60 years of refusing to let the Palestinian refugees to return to their homes in Israel--I should think they would have advised -- OUT NOW! Dutch

    • 293. 0 0
      # 266 and all your posts Moises.
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:22

      Moises I began to emphasize everything you put out then I lost it. I will not pursue it,as you have so eloquantly explained it so well. They are so brainwashed by their inferior and biased teachings in their schools from their childhood that it is like talking to a "blind" and "deaf" person.I'll bet you he/she will not take the slightest notice of what you say. If you receive a reply,it will only be a negative one without a doubt. Many a time I have decided not to respond, because it is like blowing in the wind. But,needs must I suppose,otherwise they will remain ignorant. Conversely,they need to be reminded of the TRUTH,AND NOT THEIR VERSION WHICH IS SPURIOUS AND WRONG.

    • 292. 0 0
      268 and others
      • Nick
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:16

      I often read pro-Israeli (or should I say Jewtrash - Eurotrash being a pefectly acceptable designation in this forum, it seems) comments with utter disbelief. "We Jews have kept that promise. Unfortunately,Israel is surrounded by hostile forces and has the right of self defense. In order to carry out the covenant with G-d, we Jews must protect Israel. If your country were taken over by MARTIANS....what would you do? say it is okay for MARTIANS to invade your country? Would you say it is okay for them to use their DEATH RAY on you ? Because the MARTIANS have rights? It is okay for MARTIANS to destroy men, women and children, because their rights have to be protected yours...Not Earthlings? Are you from outer space?" Madam, you have a mental health problem

    • 291. 0 0
      #259 maria
      • Labhras
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:16

      maria do you approve of the practice of marrying one,s uncle (as a niece).If so provide logic and whay is to be gained from inbreeding.

    • 290. 0 0
    • 289. 0 0
      Mr. Yaakov Sullivan, one moral standard should guide us all !!!
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:14

      Posted yesterday !!! ?As for Palestinians holding their citizens accountable for terror acts, I do not hold them to be the model of Israel. All you are saying by asking this question is that Israel does what they do." This was not my intent !! As using a more simplistic language: "Two Wrongs does not make one Right" But I also do not believe that incurring in "double standard" policy would be the correct approach.! Same moral values demanded from Israel State - and don?t take me wrong !!! indeed honest principles should be faced as part of Israel State spirit and not as simply obligations toward others. - must also guide all other nations in ME, without exception !!!! Otherwise, you are merely being "unfair" toward our State, using , as said above, different rules to judge same actions !!!!!!!

    • 288. 0 0
      It's so simple
      • Marty E.
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:11

      Unfortunately, Israel can't take the Arab Peace Plan seriously unless it provides for how to deal with Hamas and Hezbollah. The biggest obstacle to peace (besides Iran) is not the Arab states; it is the terrorist groups of Hamas and Hezbollah. The "peace" plan is inherently flawed because it has no provision regarding how to deal with that problem.

    • 287. 0 0
      BULLISTIC
      • Stash
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:10

      BULLISTIC, I exist, but given the chance--I don't do this for a living like you do--- I read posts, don't respond. I only respond to the real jerky ones. You qualify hands down. Last more jerky one I respoded to was 2 weeks ago to a real jerk who thought that an inuendo was an Italian suppository! Regards, and you know what the chain above your head is for. Please flush...and the sooner the better.

    • 286. 0 0
      Progress Not Perfection
      • Jane
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:10

      This is about progress not perfection. The Arab states are willing to accept the Jewish State in the Middle East and that is huge progress over just a few years ago. Sure there are still those who won't ever accept a Jewish presence in the region but Israel cannot look at those people when deciding how to proceed. I hope and pray Israel joins the discussion and proceeds to negotiations based on the Saudi plan warts and all.

    • 285. 0 0
      Yaacov Sullivan mistaking the theater for diplomacy
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:08

      Israel made its 'grand gesture' over 18 months ago when it picked up all the Jews living in Gaza, as well as the one's buried in the ground. It followed this move by electing Kadima, who's central platform and reason for being, was the withdrawel from the West Bank. It was met with 1,000+ Qassams and kidnapping attempts by HAMAS and Hizballah, and a verbal assault, and calls for violence when it tried to rebuild a walkway to the Temple Mount. So much for 'grand gestures'.

    • 284. 0 0
      HMMMMMM.......
      • Stephen Connor
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:07

      I sounds good on paper but the difficulities are immense. Thousands of Jews live in the Yesh. I have heard lip service well coming Jews to live in the future Palestinian State but if you look at all of these Arab nations, none of them welcome Jews, Christians, Hindus or Zoroastrians among them. I would like to see a change is attitude backed up by evidence before I accept any piece of paper. Talk is cheap and writing is the same price as talk; plus the cost of the paper and ink. Show me true recognition and acceptance, first. Peace. Steve

    • 283. 0 0
      ballistic # 210 Israel Will Pass On This One
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:06

      Howdy Ballistic; You said, "Peace with all Arab countries is a prospect too good to pass up." In the first place, Israel is not currently at war with any Arab country (the PA not being a country yet) and she has peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan. The Arab initiative offers Israel recognition by the other Arab states in exchange for her acceptance of what basically amounts to surrender terms whereas the Arabs are in no position to be dictating terms. Israel has lived without Arab recognition for 60 years and she can continue to do so indefinitely. Israel doesn't depend on the Arabs for squat so what's in it for Israel except to be swamped by 4 million hostile Palestinian refugees? Try something else.

    • 282. 0 0
      #267 Maria; hey lady jane; listen
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:05

      Notwithstanding all you say, Dubya and Condi are gonna patch up a Pal state, period, consistent with the bible or no. If you will recall, Bush's liaison to the Evangelical community quit, along with his deputy, a few months back and wrote a book saying Bush and his cohorts only used the evangelicals for votes, but referred to them as 'nut jobs', lunatics and other less than complimentary terms. We'll have to wait to see whether anybody other than Dubya is gonna do anything about this mess before the King flips the oil spigot. This issue will remain among the heathens until Jesus reappears. High regards.

    • 281. 0 0
      Bruriah Sarah software
      • Boycott
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:03

      I see you had some downtime a few days ago - adding to the database? It certainly looks like it, because you are now using a wider range of responses and possibly a more subtle range of trigger words. I imagine that the really difficult part is to get it to choose the most aposite response for each target - perhaps looking for several triggers per target?

    • 280. 0 0
      Ibrahim, the truth is very simple #231
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:01

      The problems of Northern Ireland were no less intractable than those between Israel/Palestine. They have now reached agreement, after decades of violence and ethnic murder. I'm sure Paisley detests Adams and Adams very likely loathes Raisley but they are talking and reaching compromises that are truly historic. Paisly still seeks continued union with UK while Adams seeks union with Ireland so the country will be one. But with that, they have compromised and reached a fragile peace whereby both peoples will be able to lead secure and more prosperous lives. This must happen in Israel/Palestine. Israel has been presented with a formula for final peace. There are many throny issues that must be confronted with both sides recognising the need for compromise given the parametres that are outlined in the Saudi Initiative. If not Israel will become nothing but an isolated ghetto, living off a myth that no longer is viable.

    • 279. 0 0
      #97 hudna and alberto cohen
      • abd
      • 28.03.07
      • 20:01

      Muhammad had acquired enough troops and arms to abrogate the hudna and conquer Mecca ? This analogy is a very common Zionist mythology agaisnt Islam. Did at any time Muhammad catch the Meccans unprepared? Was he massing his troops in darkness out of the view of everyone who could see? Did Meccan army shrink in size and valour at the same time Muhammad prepared his attack? The relative calm in the aftermath of the treaty of Hudaibiyah allowed Meccans to understand that Mecca would still be the center of Islamic monotheism. There would be no shift in power. It was a change of heart in Meccan themselves that allowed Muhammad to enter the city. It is a classic case of collapse from within and not a forcible conquest from without.

    • 278. 0 0
      #234 Hey Leo; who did that poll and where was it done?
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:59

      Seems as those "polls" you cite are not consistent with the BBC poll and one Fox news did for Bush administration. 5 to 1, eh, right.

    • 277. 0 0
      sara #254 - Yeah, great argument
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:59

      I hope to G'd you will be in the position of Israelis one day, measure for measure.

    • 276. 0 0
      #231 Hey Kath, "puerility"; gee I have to look that up
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:57

      however, do you think Israel is running the train for peace? Do you think Israel must agree to peace? If the int'l community backs the Arab plan with peace with Arab neighbors, what effect do YOU think Israel's rejection will have on it? As for Condi, she works for Bush and as such does what Bush tells her to do. The boycott has fallen apart and the int'l community is looking at Israel with all its demands, from a squatter viewpoint. If you think for one minute that the int'l community is gonna stick with Israel as the King threatens to cut off oil to the West, you are sadly mistaken. Wait and measure US voter support for you when oil is high or nonexistent, esp in the face of a reasonable offer for peace--unarse the land and backup to borders and never mind importing more would be Jews requiring more land. Sounds fair to me. Truth be told, from what I've been reading, Israel is not even at the table for peace, however, proxies on her behalf are. Enough foot dragging!

    • 275. 0 0
      Peace Plan?
      • Witmore
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:57

      I agree with Edifice. Doen't sound like a peace plan to me. Why were Israeli representatives not present? How can the UN even encourage agreement when Hammas disagrees to recognize Israel as a nation? It sounds like a one way demand from the Arab community. Agree or else!

    • 274. 0 0
      HOPE WILL DEFEAT HATRED
      • Mohamed MALLECK
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:55

      I had hoped, before reaching the end of the article and starting to read the Talkback section. that the opening post would be a positive, happy one. It was one full of rejection. I contined hoping that the other postings would vindicate me that the population of world-wise Israelis represented by the sample in the postings would be shown to value hope over hate. It was not to be. Hate prevailed. It is a pity because hate is suicidal, however strong, for an illusory, brief period, it may make us feel.

    • 273. 0 0
      Gil and Israel's Way Out #224
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:55

      For decades people said the same thing about Northern Ireland and the DUP and Sein Fein. The Saudi Initiative is a paradigm shift in the Arab world, not a segment of it but the entire Arab world. It is saying Israel is a reality and must be recognised but within certain borders and it must end its occupation and recognise its role in creating the refugee problem and agree to a just settlement. Before Israel rejects this outright, it owes the world, the Arab world specifically, a counter proposal that agrees to discuss the problem. There will be no peace without confronting the refugee problem. The Arab governments are seeking security and atability and know only too well that this will not be achieved unless this problem is solved once and for all. Israel simply must choose between two options-maintain its occupation over another people or face the realities and peace offers being presented to it. What is Israel willing to do vis a vis the refugee problem. Lets find that out.

    • 272. 0 0
      Jeff Nothridge on my position #218
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:49

      Let's look at this carefully, accepting that both sides are moving with caution w/maximum positions, or lack of them. The Saudi inititiative is a full peace, full diplomatic realtions in exchange for a return to pre '67 borders (or agreed upon, equitable land exchanges agreeabel to both sides),Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem and a just solution to the refugee problem. Israel has made no offer.I believe Israel could sweep them off their feet if it made a grandiose first move, ie admitting their complicty in creating the problem of refugees and willing to discuss all topics. Similary to what the writer very wisely laid out yesterday on this site. Let it state its position on the refugee question,all parties recognising that Israel will not accept a full return solution.Hamas is being hard nosed, but Israel must propose something to see how they will move.Hamas is a segment of the PA.Even if they remain intransigent in their position, there is a whole Arab world that is open to alte

    • 271. 0 0
      #242 Hey there Sara, you said a mouthful there!
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:48

      Keep blogging. Regards.

    • 270. 0 0
      Swiss(Dino) - Thanks for the response
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:48

      I agree with you on all points! Regards.

    • 269. 0 0
      #243 B. Sarah, well, all you say may be true, however
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:47

      Bush family LOVES the Saudis, yup, and Barbara says Bandar is part of the Bush family, fondly known as Bandar Bush. Say, do you have any oil? Well, the Saudis and the Arabs have the oil, yup, and the oil dictates the time and what must be done. I rest my case.

    • 268. 0 0
      242 - G-d told the Jews to live in Israel
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:47

      We Jews have kept that promise. Unfortunately,Israel is surrounded by hostile forces and has the right of self defense. In order to carry out the covenant with G-d, we Jews must protect Israel. If your country were taken over by MARTIANS....what would you do? say it is okay for MARTIANS to invade your country? Would you say it is okay for them to use their DEATH RAY on you ? Because the MARTIANS have rights? It is okay for MARTIANS to destroy men, women and children, because their rights have to be protected yours...Not Earthlings? Are you from outer space?

    • 267. 0 0
      ballistic...re. sam have you read the ....
      • maria
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:45

      the covenant of the islamic resistance movement(Hamas)---it will open your eyes...I have a book:Myths and Facts--A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict.you love to google, just go to this website.....www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...

    • 266. 0 0
      Egyptian #184 - Point by point (part 3)
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:45

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel#Six-Day_War "Palestinian territory which the Zionists claim as their own"? They did not claim it as their own until we did. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peel_Commission http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_of_Palestine Not only is there vast archaelogical proof of the Jews being from Israel, but it is well documented in other cultures as well (such as the arc in Rome depicting the conquer of Jerusalem). Do you really think that millions of people from different places, speaking different languages can have exactly the same traditions, religion and be one people by coincidence? Do you really think that they would immigrate to a war-torn backwater because of "propaganda"? This has been our hope for 2000 years. We Jews recognize the right of Palestinians to have a state. It is about time that you Arabs get over your humiliation (for which nobody thinks less of you) and respect our right too!

    • 265. 0 0
      Ibrahim
      • Danite
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:44

      How is the famous chump of hamas doing today?

    • 264. 0 0
      What israel should do
      • Danite
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:44

      As predicted Olmerts plan of livingin splendid isolation for 50 years has fallen through.The fact that the entire Arab world offers a comprehensive "peace" in return for what was negotiated more or less at Taba and geneva makes this a worthwile thing to investigate.Israel should negotiate with Abbas and the "Arab quartet".of course hse cannot be expected to agree before hand to a take it or leave scenario as their are too many issues involved like israels share of the old city, and of course no right of return.However let the Arabs present this as their opening offer and go from there.At some point or another israel will have to face the fact of a withdrawl from the west bank, might as well get started and free israel from the nightmare called the ME.

    • 263. 0 0
      Saudi Peace Plan
      • Moshe Rubner
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:43

      please let the Arabs Know that the Jewish community have met and unless the Arabs accept every part of our Peace Initiative the Lords of War will be their destinity. the following is the Peace Plan: 1) All Arabs/muslims/Palestinians must leave all of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem and go to Jordan, the true Palestinian country 2) All Jewish refugees from Arab countries shall be compenstaed for their loss and have the right of return Upon unequivical acceptance Israel will allow the Arab to have normalized relationd with Israel

    • 262. 0 0
    • 261. 0 0
      How can the Pals have right of return when its not their land?
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:40

      Where are the artifacts, history books, laws, etc. that support the Pal claim to Jewish land? The arab Pals arrived in the 1900s....Mark Twain, a famous author described the land as follows: Mark Twain, who visited Palestine in 1867, described it as: ?...[a] desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds-a silent mournful expanse....A desolation is here that not even imagination can grace with the pomp of life and action....We never saw a human being on the whole route....There was hardly a tree or a shrub anywhere. Even the olive and the cactus, those fast friends of the worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.?17 http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf1.html

    • 260. 0 0
      Egyptian. Gaza & Egypt.
      • curious
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:36

      Question. Why is it that Egypt while it controlled Gaza never gave the Arabs of Gaza either Egyptian temporary or permanent citizenship, or looked into improving their standard of living?

    • 259. 0 0
      alberto cohen...re. #136 Tupac...
      • maria
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:36

      I read the covenant of the islamic resistance movement(HAMAS)---they need to revise it,don't they?----here it is: our struggle against jews is very great and very serious....the prophet,allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said: the day of judgment will not come about until moslems fight the jews(killing the jews), when the jew will hide behind stones and trees.the stones and trees will say there is a jew behind me, come and kill him....................

    • 258. 0 0
      what for??
      • michael
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:35

      why do israelis need peace? the economy is booming, there is very little loss of life from the "war" or terrorism. even more important it is easier to fight the palestinians that the settlers and the religous right. they also get to keep the territories and can bask in heroism that the "whole world hates us". it also makes nonentities like gabe, choni, paul harris etc. and the rest heroes.

    • 257. 0 0
      How demandive some people are ! - Solana wants "FLEXIBILITY",....
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:33

      - Haniyeh-HAMAS - "AMBIGUITY regarding RIGHT TO EXIST", and "UNAMBIGOUS RIGHT TO RETURN", - Chirac - "PROPORTIONALITY regarding RESPONSE", - Ahmadinejad-IRAN - "WIPING OFF". Gabi Ashkenazi has a work to do!

    • 256. 0 0
      Egyptian #184 - Point by point (part 2)
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:31

      I don't know who was "ethically cleansed" by Israel since there are 3 million Palestinians and 1 million Arab-Israelis (in exact reverse proportion to the amount of Jews in Arab lands, where there are now about 100 total down from about 1 million - my grandparents being from Halab, Syria). 1973 - Yes, it was not fought on Israeli territory because the Arabs never made it there, despite that Sadat was willing to "sacrifice one million Egyptian soldiers." They attacked Israel on its most observed holiday, the fast day of Yom Kippur. About "liberating" the Golan and the like, those were only pretext because the Arab states no longer believed they could destroy Israel (thanks to their humiliation in 67).

    • 255. 0 0
      Saudi Arabia large sponsor of terrorism
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:30

      http://www.cato.org/dailys/11-16-01.html Saudi Arabia enlisted in the fight against terrorism only in response to intense pressure from the United States following the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Even then, its cooperation has been minimal and grudging. For example, Riyadh has resisted Washington's requests to use its bases in Saudi Arabia for military operations against Osama bin Laden's terrorist facilities in Afghanistan. Even that belated, tepid participation is an improvement on Saudi Arabia's previous conduct. The U.S. government has warned that it will treat regimes that harbor or assist terrorist organizations the same way that it treats the organizations themselves. Yet if Washington is serious about that policy, it ought to regard Saudi Arabia as a prime sponsor of international terrorism. Indeed, that country should have been included for years on the U.S. State Department's annual list of governments guilty of sponsoring terrorism. The Saudi government has been the principal financial backer of Afghanistan' s odious Taliban movement since at least 1996. It has also channeled funds to Hamas and other groups that have committed terrorist acts in Israel and other portions of the Middle East. Worst of all, the Saudi monarchy has funded dubious schools and "charities" throughout the Islamic world. Those organizations have been hotbeds of anti-Western, and especially, anti-American, indoctrination. The schools, for example, not only indoctrinate students in a virulent and extreme form of Islam, but also teach them to hate secular Western values.

    • 254. 0 0
      201shepherd THE GREATEST TERRORIST IN M.E.IS ISRAEL
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:29

      Haven't you noticed? Israel is also a menace to World Peace.

    • 253. 0 0
      Peace with Islam? Rubbish.
      • d.dor
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:27

      When has Islam made peace with anybody? Doesn't exist. Not in the Koran. They will demand the last grain of sand from Israel. Mark my words. We fight against a system of religion as much as they fight against our religion. Don't think, you secular Jews, that you don't fight against Islam. You think you are secular because you don't wear black hats? Wrong. You are Jews, period. You live in Israel and you fight for our freedom. You are religious, because you live here. You are the backbone of the Jewish state. The black hats don't fight, you do. You are the cornerstone of the resistance, the level headed savior of Israel. You are the builders of Israel. You are the men and women who go out every day and lay your lives down for us to live in Peace. I salute you. Islam will never make peace with us no matter what we give up. You know THIS. I love you and pray for you daily, oh, Jerusalem, the Jewish heartland.

    • 252. 0 0
      #217 Leo Schiener
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:26

      Which of course will make a lot of difference if the EU withdraw Israel's favoured trading status in response to Israeli refusal to pursue peace. What you don't seem to understand is the people of Europe are increasingly understanding that there is a link between their security, and the establishment of a Palestinian State. Unfortunately for Israel there are a lot of elections about to occur in Europe.

    • 251. 0 0
      68 - Rather than suspend Terrorists, you prefer to hurt Jews
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:26

      Hamas wants the destruction of Israel and are even training children to carry out that mission.Interviewer: You described Shahada as something beautiful. Do you think it is beautiful? Walla: Shahada is a very beautiful thing. Everyone yearns for Shahada. What could be better than going to paradise? Interviewer: What is better, peace and full rights for the Palestinian people or Shahada? Walla: Shahada. I will achieve my rights after becoming a shahid. We won't stay children forever. Interviewer: Ok, Yussra, would you agree with that? Yussra: Of course. It is a good [sweet] thing. We don't want this world, we want the Afterlife. We benefit not from this life but from the Afterlife. All Palestinians, not like other youth, are hot tempered, they choose Shahada, since they are Palestinian. Interviewer: Do you actually love death? The Geneva convention forbids that. In addition, Hamas uses human shields - another violation. Hamas is on the US terrorist list.... Current List of Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations Abu Nidal Organization (ANO) Abu Sayyaf Group Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade Ansar al-Islam Armed Islamic Group (GIA) Asbat al-Ansar Aum Shinrikyo Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA) Communist Party of the Philippines/New People's Army (CPP/NPA) Continuity Irish Republican Army Gama?a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group) HAMAS (Islamic Resistance Movementhttp://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm

    • 250. 0 0
      Jeff Northridge...your rejectionism is interesting...
      • Ibrahim
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:25

      How do you do, Jeff? When Barak gave Arafat a crappy deal in a take it or leave it format, Arafat rejected it, and the Palestinians were accused of not wanting peace and wanting to destroy Israel... Now you are using Arafat's argument for rejection for the Israelis... Let's cut the crap. The Arab Initiative says clearly that what the Palestinians agree to, the Arab League will follow. It is simply not fathomable, that the Israelis and Palestinians would cut a deal both sides agree to, painful comprimise, and somehow, the PA/Arab World will renig on recognition/relations with Israel. Bottom Line: This deal is good for Israel...you say Israel doesn't need the Arab recognition...Today, you are correct, but History shows clearly nations don't last long when they refuse to play nice with their neighbors.

    • 249. 0 0
      To Egyptian
      • Jack
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:23

      It's strange that you admit that the Arab States expelled the Jews after 1948 (wasn't that ethnic cleansing, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt would expel the Copts as well if they had a chance) but they did not attack Israel in 1948, they were acting in self defense ! Are you actually saying that Israel attacked Egypt, Syria and Jordan the moment it was formed ? More than half of Israel is made up of people originating in the Arab countries. Are you saying that they have no right to live in the region and to self-determination ? And another thing: did the Egyptians, Syrians etc, ever give the Palestinians the CHOICE of integrating or remaining in the camps ? No, they were kept in the camps in the hope that Israel would disappear one day and that they would be returned to villages and houses that do not exist. You can't have one principle for arab refugees and another for jewish refugees. Funny that even Egypt was occupied by Arabs and converted, the most successful imperialism ever !

    • 248. 0 0
      Egyptian #184 - Point by point (part 1)
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:22

      1948 - False. The vast amount of the land was bought at exorbitant prices using the JNF (which collects money from Jews worldwide). At no point were Arabs "kicked out". It is also completely illogical that a new state without a unified army would attack established neighbors. Here are the UN minutes: http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/7f0af2bd897689b785256c330061d253?OpenDocument Let's quote the famous Mufti of Jerusalem: "Arabs, arise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you." 1956 - What caused the war was the closing of the Suez canal by Egypt, which is why France and Britain joined Israel. 1967 - Yes, you were pre-emptively attacked because Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran and Nasser insisted that the UNEF leave Egypt. He also clearly remarked that he wanted to commit genocide. See sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War#_note-0

    • 247. 0 0
      sara # 205 That's Not Much of a Case
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:22

      Howdy Sara; The rules of war permit the assassination, capture, or imprisonment of "command and control" elements (including government officials since they are considered to be combatants) of an enemy during a period of armed conflict and it is not called "terrorism". Of course, Hamas would love to do the same to Israeli officials, but they can't get through Israel's security worth a damn. Terrorism is the deliberate targeting of non-combatants to further some political, religious or ideological goal.

    • 246. 0 0
      196 jeff northridge,jews have had compensation,how about others?
      • vijaya
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:21

      Jews have received compensation from Germany and other European countries.How about Israel accepting Palestinian refugees back? The right of return is an absolute right in International Law.Do the jews want to return? They are actually leaving the Middle East,not returning. The only time they returned to the ME was with murder and mayhem. And they stay as long as they can have their mini Floridas in historic Palestine. There is no negotiation here as in the good old days when you could bribe the PA.with a high flying lifestyle(including Swiss Bank accounts)so they could act as the civilian arm of a brutal Occupation. The Arabs are simply being polite.Israel is in violation of U.N.Resolutions and is being asked to obey them as any nation of good standing should in the U.N.system. Your advice to israel is ill conceived.The game is up and the only thing left for Israel to come to the table.

    • 245. 0 0
      72 - Hamas patient in the destruction of Israel
      • Bruriah Sarah
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:21

      Below is the Hamas Charter which calls for the destruction of Israel: The principles of the Hamas are stated in their Covenant or Charter, given in full below. Following are highlights. "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it." "The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up. " "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors." "After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying." http://www.mideastweb.org/hamas.htm

    • 244. 0 0
      US man in the street
      • Leo Scheiner
      • 28.03.07
      • 19:00

      The latest poll in the US showed that the man in the street (not jewish) believes that Israel should not make any land concessions to the Arabs by a majority of five to one. That is a society with free media and these people are making an unbiased judgement based upon how genuine or otherwise they believe the Arabs are. They see terrorists and liars, people who support violence and whose society is deeply corrupt, whether it be Palestinian, Syrian, or Saudi. I guess they have taken the measure of the Arabs and come to a sensible conclusion. Peace would be wonderful but the Arabs are really not ready for that as evidenced by their so called peace proposals which are really proposals to bury Israel in Arab returnees.

    • 243. 0 0
      C'mon Yaakov
      • Gil
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:59

      This isn't about Israel giving a "nod" to the initiative as you put it considering that Hamas has said that it will "never" recognize Israel even if Israel accepts every part of the inititative. So if Israel gives a "nod" it will be meaningless. It seems silly to believe that the Arab world will be able to pressure Hamas into accepting anything when the Arab world has assumed a position that is pretty much the same as Hamas's. Is there no way out of this mess without eliminating Israel? Not according to your logic, nor anyone who blames Israel for a problem she didn't create.

    • 242. 0 0
      ISRAEL: Pals, When Your Serious About Peace, Call Us!
      • Peter
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:59

      Imposing the same islamic political solution thats been on the board for years, and expecting different results, dumb. When pals are serious about peace, and present a serious and peaceful initiative about peaceful and prosperous existance, they will find Israel to be a welcome partner. But until then, Israel's free world trade growth will continue, while pals contemplate "refugee" status for another 60 years, and beyond.

    • 241. 0 0
      # 134 David. THIS "PEACE PLAN" JOKING ASIDE.
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:57

      David This plan is a joke and should not be taken seriously.Just a charade and leave it at that. If they are so naive as to think Israel will fall for this iniquitous proposition,than it goes to show,their puerility beyond doubt.

    • 240. 0 0
      Dino: how to be a fool?
      • Ivo
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:54

      Can't you see the writing on the wall, Dino? After reading this, should we laugh /should we cry? The only place you'd see hope /an opening after this would be by reading only between the lines, where there is nothing, & by ignoring all that the lines are saying. Why do you think the League is insisting on Israel accepting the offer first, then to come & negotiate, if this wasn't important? They could've said "this is our position, come & bring yours", but they couldn't do that. What do you expect the Israelis to talk to them about, when to schedule the next meeting? We've already had folly, how long are we gonna dance this? Can't you see this grand game being played right in front of you? Any clue now on why there are reasons to soften down statements when "a great new offer" is presented? It's not the ambiguity, it's what's being said here that is important. Note that Abbas is participating in this. You have to give the Israelis at least something, SOMETHING,if you wanna start.

    • 239. 0 0
      Hey Person; I am with you on the Mexicans; let em in
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:49

      and, if America gives land back to the Indians, I am a beneficiary, yup, I am. It is rather smug of you to insist the Israelis won't give up this and that. Dubya is gonna draw those boundaries in conjunction with the Arabs and int'l community, watch and see, with or without Israel. Why do you think Livni and Olmert are proceeding as they are, which is straight to the peace train station, yessiree. You can obfuscate the issues, but it appears that a Pal state is off to a running start. Think of it, peace with Arab countries, unarse the squatted on land and everybody lives happily ever after AND THE WEST WILL NOT HAVE OIL INTERRUPTED. Yessiree, those circumstances have Dubya munching on red pepper. All aboard!

    • 238. 0 0
      # 62 Alicia. FREEZE..............
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:48

      Dear Alicia Israel exists we do not need any prioritising or anything. They accept Israel or not TOUGH! We do not have to go down the road of begging.No caving in,no acceptance of the Saudi plan, and nothing bar stay our cause inspite of provocations from all the Arabs trying in their cynical way to try and change our dear and democratic society.

    • 237. 0 0
      Yaakov Sullivan # 198 The Arab Initiative
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:48

      Howdy Yaakov; The Arab initiative is not a "beginning opening position"; it is a list of non-negotiable demands and because of FM Saud al-Faisal's comment "If Israel refuses, that means it doesn't want peace. Then [the conflict] goes back into the hands of the lords of war," then it is also tantamount to an ultimatum. Even Javier Solana recognizes it as a "take-it-or-leave-it proposal." In it's present form, it's a cinch that Israel will reject it. I don't know where you got the idea that the Arab initiative was just a beginning opening position subject to compromise through future negotiations.

    • 236. 0 0
      The truth about Ballistic
      • Mexican
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:46

      The whole of the South West United States, including Nevada, has been illegally expropriated from Mexico, with the native population being subjected to ethnic cleansing. For all we know, Ballistic is living on the property rightfully belonging to a Mexican family. But times are a'changing. With Mexican immigration to the United States on the rise, every inch of American soil will be liberated. For Ballistic and the other squatters, settlers, and genociders, there will be only one punishment - their own - leave or else!!!! Ballistic, instead of posting on Haaretz, start packing! Nevada is going to be Mexican again. Sell your house while it is still yours!!!!!! Down with American imperialism! Free Nevada! We Mexicans have no problem with Israel. What we want is the American imperialists, who put their nose into every problem in the world, OUT of Mexican land. Have tea. Regards. Mexican

    • 235. 0 0
      #189 Hey Equalizer, whatever are you talking about?
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:43

      That peace train has already left the station; question is whether the Israelis are on it. Fortunately or unfortunately, Israel is still foot dragging, this and that, but that train has already left, kind sir. Only issue is whether you are a co-conductor or simply a passenger. Dubya isn't gonna pass up the prospect of settling the mess and Condi is off and running after Bush/Cheney neocon mind set has failed. No other choice really. US will be leaving soon, so you and yours better shake your head and catch that PEACE TRAIN, all aboard!!!

    • 234. 0 0
      Hysterical - Russ #91
      • Double Click
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:43

      Russ of Canada rants, "Stop bombing them. Stop firing rockets. Stop kidnapping. Stop Stop Stop If you stop poking the dog through the fence, the dog will stop trying to bite. Try and live like "civilized" people in the 21st century, not like a bunch of primitive tent dwellers." Without the mention of 'primitive tent dwellers', his post could easily be interpreted as a person decrying Israels demolishing of houses, the firing of rockets from U.S. donated Apache helicopters, and the kidnapping of close to 10,000 Palestinians. So much for the self-proclaimed 'civilized' Israelis, which comprise of half of their population. It is unfortunate for the other half of Israel's population which is in fact civilized, that they must put up this rabble.

    • 233. 0 0
      #161 - simply put
      • Giosta
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:40

      "There is no natural way out." Nobody. There must be one but no one knows as yet what it is. There are conflicts that last hundred of years and never get resolved. The hatered just goes on. There're people in this world who still hate Jews, blaming them for the death of Jesus. We can rationalize whatever we see if we want to change it, however, unfotrunately, some people are using hate for comfort!

    • 232. 0 0
      Sol;ana - A Laugh a Minute
      • Tod Zuckerman
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:40

      Par for the course - what is really funny is the belief among certain lefty Israelies (and not just Beilin and his band of idiots), including Barak's ex-FM, that Israel needs to be more aligned with the EU than the U.S. What is it that makes them so jerky ?

    • 231. 0 0
      #185 Hey Sam; well, er, the crystal ball
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:40

      is the one Condi and the int'l community are looking at. Peace with all Arab countries is a prospect too good to pass up. If the Israelis pass it up, woe to them! It appears you are in Canada, which doesn't have much invested in the ME mess, does it? The US has enormous blood, money, good will, etc invested and US voters will be looking to see who jeopardizes the OIL, MAN, THE OIL. Regards.

    • 230. 0 0
      # 52 Michael J. Nelson.
      • Kath'
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:39

      Michael Nor is the Saudi plan up for grabs either! Ham-ass can do what it wants,but at the end Israel is not for SALE.No return of refugees, no relinquishing our Jerusalem,and whether they accept Israel's existence or not matters not a JOT!

    • 229. 0 0
      Yaakov Sullivan
      • ODP
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:37

      Then they should say that if Israel doesn't like the initative, they should offer something not that if Israel doesn't like the initative it will be considered a declaration of war.

    • 228. 0 0
      To Everyone who Questions Hamas's Motives
      • Gil
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:36

      The spokesman for Hamas in the Palestinian parliament, Salah al-Bardawil, told Haaretz, "we will not agree to recognition of Israel or peace with it [as it appears in the initiative]. We have no problem with the part of the initiative that calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders and the right of refugees to return." Clearly, Hamas is unwilling to negotiate on any point, therefore seeks nothing less than Israel's destruction. Everyone who posts daily about Israel's "crimes" allows this fiasco to continue. No matter what Israel has done, Hamas has once again plainly stated that recognition and peace will never happen even if Israel accepts every part of the Saudi initiative. True partners in peace seek meeting points rather than making demands and issuing threats.

    • 227. 0 0
      Solana the ME expert?
      • B
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:35

      The leaders of Arab League have never wanted human and economic development. They have been able to reap bilions for themselves while using the masses as pawns for Jihad and their ill-begotten wealth. The state controlled medias have blamed the West and Israel for Arab woes and hateful policies while they promote Islamic domination by violence terror and theft rather than by achievement creativity and hard work. It is time for real leaders, not foolish EU appeaseniks that buy into Arab perfidy and greed. Arab League is the cause of ME problems, not the solution and not the victim. Let them offer Peace and coexistence and complete the population exchange they began in 1948 by ethnically cleansing their countries of Jewish presence and stealing Jewish property and waging war after war on all levels against the tiny Jewish Nation which has prospered and developed because of its human resouces and destiny inspite of the combined hatefilled forces of a twisted and unevolved abuse of Islam.

    • 226. 0 0
      ballistic march 2007 is exactly 200 years
      • barry goldwater
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:35

      since the british abolished slavery through the leadership of william wilberforce. nelson's victory at the battle of trafalagar ensured the ability of the british to enforce the abolition on the high seas. i believe the british are pretty unique in their tolerance.the abolition of slavery could not have happened anywhere else.no one else could have led the campaign. your friend saudi arabia took another 100 years before they outlawed slavery and slavery still existed in saudi in the 1960s.some would say that a slave still exists in henderson.

    • 225. 0 0
      The truth #14 Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • Johnny
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:27

      So absolutely perfectly formulated!

    • 224. 0 0
      the worst parts
      • blinky
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:25

      some of the israeli - pro-israeli responses here are reminiscent of the worst parts of the OT - its a shame because this opportunity for israel wont come again...

    • 223. 0 0
      Reader
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:19

      "Its time for the United nations to talk tough for israel ?" You didn't bother to read Solana's remarks? Unless the Arabs are flexible, the Palestinians will remain stateless.

    • 222. 0 0
      AND WHATS IN IT FOR ISRAEL?
      • Nicole
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:17

      Sorry, am I missing something?????????? The Arab countries have a meeting together WITHOUT ISRAEL. They want this they want that but what are they offering in return....NOTHING!!!!

    • 221. 0 0
      110 Jack read historian Illan Pappe's Ethnic Cleansing of Palesti
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:17

      The ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population was a deliberate pre planned act.The villagers were driven out at gunpoint,firebombs,car bombs(the Stern Gang) grenades thrown into houses etc.This was Zionist policy from the time of the founding of Zionism.Theodor Herzel,an Austrian Jew,author of Der Judenstaat(1896) believed in the ethnic cleansing of the native populations,and so did his peers and successors.The Zionists(literally) carried out this plan so as to empty the land and fill it with jews from various of the world.We are not talking about the small percentage of jews who lived there earlier on,who had returned at various stages in their history. Today,according to Internationa Law .the U.N.Charter of Rights and the Geneva Convention, land occupied in war cannot stay occupied.Hence Resolution 242(which Israel has violated since 1967) and the absolute right of refugees to return,Resolution 194(III,as of 1948)

    • 220. 0 0
      ballistic
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:16

      "co-conductor of the peacae train Condi is running on behalf of Bush?" Seven years after the fact that the Palestinians could have had one in 2000. Oh, what a victory!

    • 219. 0 0
      Hamas belives that the goal justifies the means!
      • Aaron Giostar
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:16

      How can you trust any agreement that this people ever sign? It's the old "if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck it's probably a duck" Hamas acts tell us best that the destruction of Israel is their target. The truth in Gaza was designed as a "regrouping and rearming period," do'nt kid yourself for a minute that it was meant to signal anything else. Their acts prove it!

    • 218. 0 0
      Flexible
      • tadchase
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:15

      Hamas is a political party that got itself elected in large measure due to Fatahs corruption and lack of progress to independent state. I think the Palestinian people would support a peace plan that created a sovereign state that recognized Israel. If Hamas opposed a real peace plan in a delusional absolutist desire to destroy Israel it would be voted out of office.

    • 217. 0 0
      american living here
      • schmdt
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:13

      when are you going to give back your country to the native americans? or do you only expect israel to be so magnanimous?

    • 216. 0 0
      #179 Mark Lincoln - IAEA inspections back to NPT levels in Iran
      • Pablo B
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:12

      Mark, you said Iran decided to "reduce cooperation with the IAEA." That makes it sound like they are violating the NPT. That would be false. Iran ended ONLY their voluntary expanded inspection program they began in 2002. Iran is now at the standard level of monitoring required by NPT. In 2002, prior to being labeled "Axis of Evil", Iran went beyond the required NPT inspections and threw open their doors to expanded inspections. This was done to show they had NO weapons program to hide so that reasonable and logical people would recognize this and negotiate in good faith. This failed. Soon after voluntarily throwing their doors open, they were labeled "Evil" and the US relased false intel about Iranian (&Iraqi) weapons programs. The US has killed any chance of reasonable negotiations, so Iran has ended their voluntary 2002 expanded inspections and is just allowing the required NPT inspections. Iran isn't violating NPT, and IAEA has not found a secret weapons program.

    • 215. 0 0
      Right of Return means War
      • semsem
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:10

      Right of Return means the Arabs want war. The Jews are not requesting that the 1,000,000 Jews forced to leave the Arab countries return. It is totally unreasonable and unacceptable for the Palestinians to insist on this.

    • 214. 0 0
      #13 Tupac
      • tadchase
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:08

      UCLA - go Bruins!

    • 213. 0 0
      sara
      • Gina
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:02

      "The General Assembly must move NOW for the suspension" The General Assembly's resolutions are not legally binding, but then you knew this, correct. Great idea, however. It is strategies like these that keep Palestinians disinterested in peace, and stateless for sixty years.

    • 212. 0 0
      ISRAEL IS AN APARTHEID STATE
      • vijaya
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:01

      Israel's ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian population and its current discriminatory legislation which makes its Arab 'citizens' second class citizens clearly puts it in the category of an apartheid state. Arabs in Israel,by Law, cannot enroll in the army or hold property except in certain locations.This is unlike the situation in any other democracy in today's world where ethnic minorities are guaranteed equality under the Law. Israel resembles the former South African apartheid regime. As a coloniser of historic Palestine it differs from the British colonial Occupation of India in that Britain was there for commercial purposes,for extracting maximim profit from the land and the people. Israel on the other hand also has as its goal the ethnic cleansing of its Palestinian population. In today's world of liberated countries and even with the demise of apartheid South Africa,the state of Israel is an anomaly and unless it changes its direction is a problem for the world.

    • 211. 0 0
      # 180 ballistic
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:01

      1. Saudis won't destroy their wealth for Pali Land 2. There will be zero right of return.

    • 210. 0 0
      Agreements
      • Naftali
      • 28.03.07
      • 18:00

      Yup, agreements with the Arab countries are ironclad and dependable, just like the Hamas/Fatah agreement signed in Mecca. How many people have been shot since that agreement? Why, just today they attacked a a terrorist and his family (with the kids in the car, shooting 10 bullets into it)

    • 209. 0 0
      "...sea of peace."
      • Blogowitz
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:59

      Abbas is a LIAR. He knows what the Mecca plan says--that if offers nothing for Israel & changes NONE of the commitments in the PA/Hamas charters, and will have no sustainable effect on the intentions of Iran or Syria. There will be no "sea of peace"--only a rising tide of pressure--political and militarily to finish off Israel. According to previous "agreements," the PA/Hamas were to write a new constitution, charter, and accept Israel. Still not done! NONE of the parties to this "peace" meeting have ever made concessions to Israel--only aggressive acts to destroy Israel/Jews/Zion/Zionists. BEWARE OF THE LIARS!!

    • 208. 0 0
    • 207. 0 0
    • 206. 0 0
      Egyptian - oh it was alright when it lasted
      • kjeli
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:49

      ''The Egyptian Government, and those of Syria and Lebanon, have not given citizenship to the Palestinian refugees for the simple fact that they are Palestinian, not Egyptian, or Syrian, or Lebanese, and their desire is to return home'' Haha don't make me laugh. The Egyptians were so conscious of Palestine during the 50s weren't they!? So conscious it formed part of Egypt! Let's face it, Egypt only recognised Palestine when it lost Gaza in 67.

    • 205. 0 0
      167scott guy,israeal first imprisons and then. . .
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:45

      Last year Israel kidnapped and imprisoned minsters of a democratically elected government and continues to do so.Explains after the fact that they are 'terrorist' Familiar refrain.As for the argument that anything is acceptable under certain circumstances,would you grant that to Hamas also ? I rest my case.

    • 204. 0 0
      Tupac # 142
      • ChanahS
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:42

      Do you know that the term "right of return" is one that was coined by the State of Israel and refers to the right of every Jew to come and live in Israel. The Palestinians have stolen this term, as they are trying to steal our history and cliaim to this land.

    • 203. 0 0
      Tupac # 142
      • ChanahS
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:42

      Do you know that the term "right of return" is one that was coined by the State of Israel and refers to the right of every Jew to come and live in Israel. The Palestinians have stolen this term, as they are trying to steal our history and cliaim to this land.

    • 202. 0 0
      Swiss
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:38

      If walking backward is part of enlightenment, then a lot of people would fit that description. :)

    • 201. 0 0
      Hamas leader Khaled Meshal is full of BS
      • Shepherd
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:34

      Rejection of Saudi peace plan only means Israel is rejecting the Saudi plan But are embracing peace. But not at Israels expense. People like Khaled Meshal is not one that should talk about accepting peace. He is one of the biggest problems in the mideast. Also when does a known terrorist have the right to evenexpress his views to the world. When they became terrorist they lost that right. His view means nothing.

    • 200. 0 0
      The Real Return
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:31

      A right of return that needed no qualifying quotation marks was exercised at this time. Fleeing increasing intolerance, violent persecution, and property confiscations in Arab countries and Iran in the years 1947 - 1953 were 820,000 Jewish refugees. Of these, 586,000 settled in Israel; many of the rest emigrated to France or the United States. All escaped lands their ancestors had lived in for centuries, in some cases millennia, and they left behind property worth several times that of the Arab refugees from Israel. These Jewish refugees exercised an actual "right of return" to ancient Jewish lands, a right as old as Israelite settlement in Judea and Samaria more than 3,000 years ago, as enduring as the continuous Jewish presence in Eretz Yisrael (the Land of Israel), and expressed daily in Jewish prayers for the ingathering and return of the exiles since the Babylonian destruction of the First Temple in Jerusalem (586 B.C.E.) and Roman destruction of the Second Temple (70 C.E.). The Jewish right of return was reaffirmed, not granted, in Britain?s 1917 Balfour Declaration, which looked with favor on the establishment of the Jewish national home in Palestine. The Jews? rights in the land of Israel were recognized by the League of Nations? Mandate for Palestine (1922). The mandate, administered by Great Britain, referred to the ?historical connections? of the Jewish people to the land and to ?reconstituting? their national home. No sovereign Arab or Muslim state of ?Palestine?

    • 199. 0 0
      There is only one kind of war acceptable:
      • Somebody
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:27

      :that of fighting for the Truth; so that it may prevail. So help us G-D! When the alternative left for Israel is to submit himself to lies, then I hope Israel will not accept "peace" that bases itself on lies; it is like selling one's soul to the Devil. I think that time for compromising on himself is over for Israel. This is it. NO more!

    • 198. 0 0
      The Two Needed Nods
      • Yaakov Sullivan
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:26

      The Saudi Initiative has received a nod from Arab nations. It presents Israel with peace for a return of land. It has given Israel the nod. Israel, beyond verbalambiguity, has rejected it as a beginning opening position. What it must do is give the Arabs a nod. A statement of unqualified acceptance. Hamas, at least in its verbal assertions, also refuses to nod, obviously waiting for Israel to first nod. Both Israel and Hamas have taken the hard line, as has Israel's national Union faction whose position is identical to Hamas in the reverse. Peace is dependent upon compromise as we saw yesterday in Northern Ireland. Let Israel take the first step and make an offer and lets see where palestinian and Arab world pressure can bring a compromise in Hamas's intransigence.But Israel must give the Arab world something real at this juncture.

    • 197. 0 0
    • 196. 0 0
      Ibrahim # 160 That's Just the Problem
      • Jeff Northridge
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:21

      Howdy Ibrahim; The Arab initiative is not a list of "bargaining chips" to be compromised on or modified through negotiations. It is a list of non-negotiable demands--basically an ultimatum. The only issue that it leaves to negotiations is the "just solution" to the refugee problem (for Palestinian refugees only and not Jewish ones). In all other cases, the Arab initiative presupposes the outcome of precisely those issues which need to be negotiated between Israel and the PA before those negotiations have even taken place. The only carrot offered by the Arab League is recognition of Israel which Israel can live without and that is not even binding on the PA since the PA is not a full-fledged member of the Arab League although it does have observer status. It's not a good deal and Israel should reject it.

    • 195. 0 0
      The Arabs perpetuated the displacement
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:16

      The Arab states, along with Palestinian Arab leadership, perpetuated the refugees? displacement, rejecting their assimilation and normalization. They did so for the same reason they refused Israel?s offer to make the 1949 armistice lines permanent borders. They refused to recognize Israel as a sovereign state and so rejected direct negotiation with it over outstanding issues. Over time, UNRWA evolved into a permanent Palestinian bureaucracy with a vested interest in maintaining Palestinian Arabs as refugees rather than resettling and rehabilitating them. According to Ralph Galloway, former director in Jordan of U.N. aid to Palestinian refugees, ?the Arab states don?t want to solve the refugee problem. They want to keep it as an open sore, as an affront to the U.N. and as a weapon against Israel.?

    • 194. 0 0
      Criticism of Johnyboy argument 135
      • inigo montoya
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:16

      I don't think that is a very fair characterization. 1. The pals did NOT put in writing. In fact, they breached every single commitment they made at Oslo and never implemented ANY Of it. Israel implemented 100% of her commitments for Years. 2. In fact, the PA has consistently insisted that 100% of Israel is "palestinian land" and ALL of their maps show it as such, it is a death penalty crime for Jews to own property in Palestine uder PA law, PA appointed political leaders and muftis, and even state created tv shows teach kids and adults that 100% of Israel will and must be "liberated." 3. When asked if his "1975 phased plan for Israel's destruction was still in play," Arafat said "yes" several times in the Arab media AFTER Oslo. (In that plan, he suggested trying to obtain as much land as possible by promising peace and then using it as launching pad for attacking and destroying Israel once and for all.)

    • 193. 0 0
      # 168 Moises
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:15

      Moises, no reasonable person will expect from Israel to accept the Saudi plan. Note, this is an Arab maximum demand, even the Saudis know exactly that Israel won't and can't accept that. However, as I stated in my earlier post, what we can expect from Israel is to make a serious counter-offer. If she is just silently ignoring it, she will look again like the peace-spoiler. And that's simply not smart politics. I still owe you a quick response to a post of yours from a few days ago, where you quoted me to have said that Israel is strengthening anti-Semitism. You got me wrong, what I said was, that Mr.Nethanyau and his Likud would strengthten anti-Israel, and with that unfortu- nately also anti-Semitic feelings through their extremist, demagogic policies. The same way Bush strengthened anti-American feelings, and the Islamic extremists are strengthening anti- Muslim feelings. Again, that can never be an excuse for anti- Semitism, but it is a sad fact.

    • 192. 0 0
      Refugees
      • Naim S. Mahlab
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:13

      What happens to the 800M Jewish refugees from Moslem countries and their property ?

    • 191. 0 0
      ballistic
      • person
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:12

      Ballistic, the Western Wall is in East Jerusalem. Israel will not release control over the Western Wall under any circumstances. I am not aware of any Israeli statesman, left or right, who has agreed to that/ or return of refugees. And by the way, how exactly are you going to sign a peace treaty without Israel? I must be missing something. As far as the settlers, if the Palestinians are so upset about Jews in their midst, don't you think that Israeli Arabs also need to leave. Wouldn't that be fair? Personally, if I was you, I'd be leaving Nevada...if the Mexicans come, they won't speare anybody...just like you didn't when you took over it. Yup. The Mexican invasion is coming, and they are going to change their language, and unarse you from the settlements. I support the Mexican struggle for self-determination. Better hire a U-Haul now, cause their won't be any mercy.

    • 190. 0 0
      ambituity in Iran's program
      • inigo montoya
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:12

      I respecfully disagree. Some of the key questions include the fact that what they insist on is the ability to enrich uranium. Their project really only has 2 uses, fuel rods for reactors and weapons. Very few countried with nuclear power plants enrich their own uranium because the last time I saw an expert discussing this, he claimed that to be cost efficient you'd need at least 20 nuclear plants to make it worthwile to make your own instead of just buying them. And at that time, Iran had zero running nuclear power plants...and the world community had promised them a protected supply of rods if they would promise to stop the enrichment...and this also begs the question of why a nation sitting on top of much of the world's oil feels it is suddenly necessary to use nuclear power for fuel?

    • 189. 0 0
      # 180 Ballistic. peace train my a**, wait for the terror to dis
      • The Equalizer
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:11

      disrupt it......there is no way any Unity government is going to be able to tame the terror cells and splinter groups who vow to destroy Israel. Until the terror is controlled by Hamas or by Israel, your "Peace Train" will never leave the station.

    • 188. 0 0
      re # 136 TUPAC "sorry" for reading hamas covenant !!!
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:11

      Regarding your Native American people, I am sorry for them ! You should create another forum in order to submit your complaints I will support you! Getting back to KT "predictions" Regarding your "google" comment. I was not suposed to read Hamas covenant ? Do you mean that I am not allowed to perform research on Hamas trully intentions ? Here is another good life lesson for YOU !! Maybe if your people had spend some time and "google" about your enemies truly intentions, they would had never been defeated ! Sure, Israel will not comit the same mistke !!

    • 187. 0 0
      Manipulating Refugee Status( 2/2)
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:10

      On Dec. 14, 1950, the General Assembly adopted Resolution 394, which reiterated that refugee reintegration should be accomplished by repatriation OR resettlement. It also urged that the refugees ?be treated without discrimination? -- a provision violated by all the Arab states but, in some respects, Jordan. On Jan. 26, 1952, the U.N. General Assembly returned to the issue in Resolution 513. It again recommended ?reintegration either by repatriation or resettlement.? Had Resolution 194 recognized or established a ?right of return? for Palestinian Arab refugees, Resolutions 393, 394 and 513 would have been unnecessary, and they would not have referred to resettlement of the Arab refugees within the Arab countries in which they resided. Peculiarly, of the millions of refugees after World War I, the tens of millions of refugees in 1933 - 1945, and tens of millions more in 1945 - 1955, ONLY the Arabs from 1948 have been permitted to inherit refugee status. Hence, roughly 500,000 people have become 3 million to 5 million ?refugees,? or ?refugees and their descendants,? claiming in insistent bad faith a ?right of return.?

    • 186. 0 0
      Manipulating Refugee Status (1/2)
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:09

      Under U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194 (Dec. 11, 1948) the Arab states were offered the opportunity to negotiate return of refugees who wished to live in peace with Israelis, OR compensation for them. The Arabs were not promised both return and compensation, as the PLO and, more recently, the PA have insisted. The central point of Resolution 194 was establishment of a conciliation commission ?at the earliest possible date ... to seek agreement by negotiations [for] a final settlement of all questions between them.? That is, the resolution neither recognized nor established ?a right of return,? but recommended that the Arab states negotiate with Israel about repatriation and other issues. All the Arab states voted against Resolution 194 because it contained no ?right of return? and because to have voted in favor would have meant implicit recognition of Israel. Seeking to continue their war against the Jewish state by other means, they demanded instead that the United Nations grant an absolute "right" to return and subsequently misinterpreted Resolution 194 as if such a right had been recognized. Subsequent U.N. decisions demonstrated there was no ?right of return.? On Dec. 2, 1950, General Assembly Resolution 393 asserted that ?the reintegration of the refugees into the economic life of the Near East, either by repatriation or resettlement, is essential ... for the realization of conditions of peace and stability in the area.? Juxtaposing refugee resettlement against repatriation as an equivalent solution again shows there was no ?right of return.?

    • 185. 0 0
      Ballistic and her\his magic ball
      • Sam
      • 28.03.07
      • 17:02

      Living in an imaginary world seems much more pleasant than accepting reality for people involved in the mideast conflict.

    • 184. 0 0
      Re: Moises (attempted genocide)
      • Egyptian
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:57

      1948 - the Zionists attempted and succeeded in conquering and colonizing the native land of the Palestinians. The Palestinians & the Arab states resisted 1956 - the Zionists illegally invaded Egypt, committing war crimes in the Sinai desert, acts which they acknowledged in 1996 1967 - the Zionists attacked the Arab states, allegedly pre-emptively (the Zionist Gov. does not even dispute the fact that the Arab states did not attack first), then proceeded to conquer and begin to colonize Egyptian and Syrian land, in addition to that of Palestine (which belies the claim that they were acting in self-defense - colonization and ethnic cleansing is not self-defense) 1973 - Egypt and Syria launch a war to liberate the Sinai and Golan - a war fought ENTIRELY on Egyptian and Syrian territory. Not one incident of that war took place within the Palestinian territory the Zionists claim as their state. This does not constitue attempted genocide under even the most ridiculous of definitions.

    • 183. 0 0
      #143 KUTW "Israel should not discuss the plan"
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:48

      well, no matter, cause the plan will be discussed by Arabs, Condi, int'l community, et al. If Israel doesn't wanna discuss it, fine and dandy, but folks like you won't be able to complain of the end result which is gonna be a Pal state, yup. At this point with 60 years of BS, foot dragging with US backing, you and yours are simply passengers on the peace train. Dubya is gonna set those boundaries for his legacy, now in tatters. I do believe there is gonna be a new Pal state coming soon to your area with its capital as East Jerusalem, which is why Dubya refused to move the US embassy there. No point in hiring a second UHaul to move it back. Yup, moving day is upon you and yours back to the '67 boundaries, unarsing all the settlements along the way. If not, US will leave you high and dry cause US is having a tad of trouble in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan and you cannot be a stick in the spoke of the wheels now pinching Bush's cajones, got it? Okay.

    • 182. 0 0
      to arabs
      • ed
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:46

      no peace with terrorists! the day that arabs start use there brains instead of there ..... maybe Israel will make peace with them!

    • 181. 0 0
      #163 Egyptian - You Are Proof There Is No Hope
      • Chick Corea
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:42

      Arabs support absurd demands on a foundation of lies. If you think Israel begun the war of 1948 as I am sure many Arabs believe, then what use are discussions? If for you, up is down and black is white, why talk? Every war Arabs began they lost. The next will be the same but there will be a difference. Israeli cities will be rocketed and non combatabts will die but for the first time Arab cities- always immune form all the wars will be hit. Syrian infrastructure will be so degraded that no amount of international aid will prop it up. The next war will be the more costly to Arabs as none have been previously. Not only Arab armies will be taken apart but the Arab nations themselves that join in the fight.

    • 180. 0 0
      #125 Hey Rafa; do you think you are the
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:42

      co-conductor of the peacae train Condi is running on behalf of Bush? If you think so, think again. Dubya and Condi are gonna get that Pal state up and running, whether or not you agree, since you have set unacceptable conditions before talking. Enough two stepping and BS about ROR and East Jerusalem. Since Israelis will never agree to anything close to reasonable given their squatter status, it is up to Dubya and the int'l community to stitch it together, cause the West doesn't want to have no oil in their future per Saudi King. The situation is one of Dubya's cajones being caught in a wringer, yup, they are. All aboard for the peace train!!!

    • 179. 0 0
      Little ambiguity on Iran weapons program
      • Mark Lincoln
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:41

      Iran is not pursuing 'ambiguity' in it's statements about a nuclear weapons program. It claims it does not have one. It did in the 1980s, but that program was largely discontinued following the destruction of Iraq's nuclear weapons program following the Gulf War. What Iran clearly has is a broad based program for nuclear power, medicine and industrial applications. There are aspects of this program which are 'dual use' and thus require constant monitoring and inspections. So far there is no indication of a program to make Highly Enriched Uranium, or to extract Plutonium from spent reactor fuel. Either would be evidence of a nuclear weapons program virtually impossible to totally hide (especially Plutonium reprocessing). It is very unfortunate that the one blatant response Iran has made to the extended 'sanctions' recently imposed was to reduce cooperation with the IAEA, thus increasing, as time goes on, uncertainty as to their activities.

    • 178. 0 0
      Egyptian #163 - "The Arabs did not start it" - False
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:40

      That is false. It is clearly documented. The Jews were celebrating in the streets when their state was recognized. Does that look like a prelude to an attack to you? For Jews, it was heaven. This whole Palestinian problem stems from the direct violation by Egypt and other Arab states of the UN resolution recognizing Israel. Espousing the three "no's" of Khartoum, the Arab states attempted three explicit attempts to commit genocide against Israel (48, 67, 73). As Nasser said in '67: "Our goal is to destroy Israel. The Arabs want to fight".

    • 177. 0 0
      #159 The Best Possible Solution...
      • Somebody
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:39

      ...number ONE would be to make the whole world accept the Truth. AND it is on Israel's side. The winner takes it all! Everything else is nothing but distortion of the Truth. Israel is standing in the cross-roads: will he stay true to the historic facts or let himself be pulled to play the distortion game on the Arabs' terms. It is a CHOICE, not a necessity.I hope Israel will make a wise choice.

    • 176. 0 0
      re#136 Sorry,I was not suposed to read Hamas convenant ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:33

      Regarding your Native American people, I am sorry for them ! You should create another forum in order to submit your complaints ! Getting back to KT "predictions" Regarding your "google" comment. I was not suposed to read Hamas convenat ? Do you mean that I am not allowed to perform research on Hamas trully intentions ? Here is another good life lesson for YOU !! Maybe if your people had spend some time and learned about your enemies truly intentions, they would had never been defeated ! Sure, Israel will not comit the same mistke !!1

    • 175. 0 0
      They want their cake, Israel's cake , and to eat it too
      • Avrum
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:31

      Hamas says "we will not agree to recognition of Israel or peace with it [as it appears in the initiative]. We have no problem with the part of the initiative that calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders and the right of refugees to return." To all the Israeli bashers out there i will explain this in simple terms. Excuse the capitals but it is the only way you will understand IT DOES NOT MATTER IF ISRAEL AGREES TO 100% OF THE REQUESTS. HAMAS ONLY WANTS THE ERADICATION OF ISRAEL FROM THE MAP.

    • 174. 0 0
      Jonnyboy #135 - Yes, they did
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:26

      You are supposed to be more credible because you are "a politician"? There was no Palestinian state to be recognized! In Oslo times, Israel provided the PA with weapons, trained its police officers, collected taxes for it and recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people. They also offered them a state in Oslo and Taba with recognition automatically implicit. Pal statehood would entail getting rid of whole towns (settlements) - how is this not recognition? Yeah, you sure are a politician.

    • 173. 0 0
      Egyptian - why are you people living in cemeteries
      • * BEN JABO
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:24

      Their hopes for future democracy died long ago.

    • 172. 0 0
      bloomberg story on intel israel
      • flashman
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:24

      intel's israeli team save intel from profit plunge. what was that our enemies say about israel being a drag on the usa?

    • 171. 0 0
      Re: dsone (citizenship)
      • Egyptian
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:21

      How nice and original of you to highlight the legitimacy of the Palestinian cause by using quotation marks. The Egyptian Government, and those of Syria and Lebanon, have not given citizenship to the Palestinian refugees for the simple fact that they are Palestinian, not Egyptian, or Syrian, or Lebanese, and their desire is to return home. The family from Tel Aviv wants to return to Tel Aviv, not to Cairo. The family from Haifa wants to return to Haifa, not Damascus. To do as you disengenuously suggest would be to abrogate their rights and to allow the Zionists to argue that the refugee problem has been solved (a point you obviously know well, hence your reason for making it). We will not be accessories to the illegal and immoral land grab. Our citizenship does not exist to legitimize ethnic cleansing.

    • 170. 0 0
      LAkshmi # In fact Arab world is patient with Israel
      • Reader
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:17

      There's is no justification for violence and killing from either side .But ,The world knows all the crimes state of israel committed till date .Theres is no need for Israel to accept those crimes because those crimes were commited infront of international community . How many UN resolutions Israel have thrown into dustbin till date .ISrael the only nation enjoying state of the art weapons ( Nuclear ? IAEA Where are you ).Falsification and manipulation of information using the media propoganda Its time for the United nations to talk tough for israel ? Isnt it. God Bless.

    • 169. 0 0
      Status quo
      • Sam
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:16

      Arab leaders more worried about stability of their regimes and personal luxuries than rocking the boat with real peace deal.

    • 168. 0 0
      This 'peace plan' is a disaster
      • Moises
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:15

      This Saudi 'peace plan' does not only espouse the 'right of return' for Palestinians to Israel proper - it also calls for a halt in Jewish emigration to Israel. No Israeli politician, no matter how leftist, would ever agree to commit to Israel's destruction. This 'initiative' is really the Arab countries putting forward something that Israel cannot accept in order to then accuse it of belligerence. Would you accept a 'peace plan' from a third party that does not even see you as human, and educates its citizens in Nazi propaganda about you?

    • 167. 0 0
      #152 ISRAEL IS JAILING CRIMINALS
      • ScotGuy
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:15

      The IDF just defends Israel against enemies who have lost their mind and decide to commit crimes against Israelis, it tries to convince them not to do the crimes, when this doesn't work it tries to jail the criminals, if this doesn't work it tries to take out the leaders of these criminal organizations, when their is no option left it just does what it is supposed to do. If you ever have time to study law, there are instances called legitimate defense that justify things that would in other circumsances be considered a crime. If Hamas chose war and the destruction of Israel instead of peace and dialogue, it should not complain if Israel defends itself.

    • 166. 0 0
      Re: Jack (refugees)
      • Egyptian
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:12

      You are no doubt aware that the right of return is enshrined in international law. It is not a matter of debate, it is a legal fact. The refugee families simply want to return to their native land; they want to go home. They do not want to "integrate" and become Egyptians or Syrians or Lebanese. They want to return home and be Palestinians, as is their legal right. Moreover, the expulsion of Jews from Arab states after the Palestine War does not retrospectively validate the Zionist crimes of that war. And with direct regard to the Palestine War, the Arabs did not start it. It was a war commenced by the Zionist attempt to conquer and colonize Palestine. The Arab states and the Palestinian people themselves were exercising the right of self-defense.

    • 165. 0 0
      re#68Sara ,all these countries do not comply with UN resolutions
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:12

      So you do just have a problem with Israel State ?

    • 164. 0 0
      Why should hamas recognize Israel?
      • John
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:12

      Indrajaya and others always call for reciprocal recognitions between Israel and Hamas - totally ignoring that Israel has accepted that Palestinians should have a state and the details are to be negotiated. Hamas's refusal to recognize and promise peace under any circumstances is never couched as negotiating position. They insist on a state and the right to continue the conflict after statehood. How can you read it any other way? And why is that acceptable to any reasonable person in this talkback?

    • 163. 0 0
      Why should hamas recognize Israel?
      • John
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:12

      Indrajaya and others always call for reciprocal recognitions between Israel and Hamas - totally ignoring that Israel has accepted that Palestinians should have a state and the details are to be negotiated. Hamas's refusal to recognize and promise peace under any circumstances is never couched as negotiating position. They insist on a state and the right to continue the conflict after statehood. How can you read it any other way? And why is that acceptable to any reasonable person in this talkback?

    • 162. 0 0
      #68 sara: We'll suspend Israel on Thursday after the rain is over
      • People of the World
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:05

      For now, wait please.

    • 161. 0 0
      The worst possible solution
      • Nobody
      • 28.03.07
      • 16:02

      Israel has 3 basic choices: 1. To fight back - this creates more terror. 2. To do nothing This creates even more terror. 3. To make concession - This creates the most terror. There is no natural way out. The Saudi plan is choice #3. Any conessions that the Arabs make they will not keep and yet Isreal will obligated its concessions.

    • 160. 0 0
      Daniel Leopold, who is the real idiot?
      • Ibrahim
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:59

      Using the "right of return" as a pretex to completely reject the notion of peace talks and a continuation of Israeli policy in the territories (resembling apartheid by most accounts).... ....IS ALSO IDIOTIC. Everything is on the table when the talks kick off...including a comprimising of the right of return. I am not sure if you are an attorney or not, but have you heard the phrase: bargaining chip?

    • 159. 0 0
      Cue the camera's, roll the music, and someone find Marty S.
      • Jacob Blues
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:59

      Too bad Marlon Brando passed away, we could have put him in place of KSA Abdullah. "If Israel refuses, that means it doesn't want peace. Then (the conflict) goes back into the hands of the lords of war." I wonder how "let's make him an offer he can't refuse" translates into Arabic? Someone needs to remind the Saudi Monarch that his words definitaly sound like he's in the 'lords of war' camp, not the peace camp. The only thing it appears that the Arab League is serious about, is conquest. The iffy sorta kindof peace is being pushed foward for a definitive rock solid, hand over of territory.

    • 158. 0 0
      Joan of Arc, at 19 against all odds, delivered her people from de
      • Lisa
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:58

      Israel has thus far earned its right to stay in the MidEast unless it cannot make peace with and provide justice to its neighbors. "France: Ismail Haniyeh leader of the amicable Hamas movement is the Joan of Arc of our modern era." Ynet News March 2007

    • 157. 0 0
      Arab plan is Israel's new independance day
      • Moise
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:57

      The Arab plan should be considered seriousely by Israeli Society. This is the last chance for israel to be accepted as an independant normal Nation among the nations. The entire Arab/islamic world and would regnize the jewish right for a nation in historic Palestine. Arabs and jews have so many commun heritage I am sure they will mange to live in peace once the Palestinian proble is solved. Shalom/Salam/peace/paix/EL pais

    • 156. 0 0
      Arabs dictating terms to others means war, not peace.
      • David
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:53

      Typical in the Arab world. Israel won the war. Winner determine the terms, not the losers. However, Israel is a magnanamous winner and is willing to negotiate. Arab leaders never admit they keep losing over and over again and their people keep suffering for it. Its time for Arab world to admit they have lost and are losing more each decade. They have fallen behind in science, culture, healthcare, with only a few exceptions the Arab world is in a state of decay and colapse. It didnt haveto be that way and doesnt need to stay that way, but for Saudi Gammorah to dictate to Israel shows they are not ready to lead.

    • 155. 0 0
      ISRAEL'S CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
      • laksmi
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:53

      Israel has been found out and ditto its 'civilised' racist supporters.

    • 154. 0 0
      Egyptian,if you love your "Palestinian "
      • dzone
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:53

      "brothers" sow much why your government didn't gave them Egyptian citizenship as they are probably 10th generation in your country since 1948.They have nothing with Israel.

    • 153. 0 0
      Correction to Title
      • Haaretz Chief
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:50

      The correct title to this article should be, "Saudi FM: If Israel refuses Arab offer, it means it doesn't want peaceFUL DESTRUCTION OF ITSELF". We apologize for any confusion caused by this mistake, and anybody who felt the wee bit of glee over the previous title should just surrender to the Arabs now. The Burkas will be issued to all personnel, Male or Female, who have surrendered already.

    • 152. 0 0
      #23 a voice of reason
      • margaret
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:49

      What a refreshing voice of reasoon! Ask any American and they will tell you that they would fight an occupation of their land with vigor and fervor until the bitter end, just as the Palestinians have done and as the Iraqis are doing. Israel demands the Palestinians renounce violence and recognize Israel's right to exist, but refuses to renounce violence and recognize Palestine's right to exist.

    • 151. 0 0
      Did you read the headline?
      • Walt Schweitzer
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:46

      Most talkbackers don't respond to the actual statement of the Saudi FM: " If Israel refuses Arab offer, it means it doesn't want peace ". The ball is in Israel. No tricks allowed. The world is watching. Now it's all about credibility.

    • 150. 0 0
      Gird your loins for war
      • Leo Scheiner
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:42

      The signs are so clear. The Saudis and Abbas are both wordmasters with no power, ability or even willingness to deliver. Talking to them may make diplomatic sense, but peace isn't going to happen while Iran and Syria hold the real power and compromise is not in their dictionary. Israel should present counter-proposals which the arabs will refuse of course. Hamas and Hizbollah believe they have the right formula now and both are preparing for a new war. Iran and Syria will pull the trigger when it suits them. The US will almost certainly bomb Iran sooner or later and that will be the trigger for an all out war on Israel. Israel can pre-empt this by choosing their time and place before all the arab preparations are done. But war is inevitable and no amount of talking will not change that unfortunately. This time Israel must be well prepared and not have a novice at the helm otherwise it could be the last time. Israel must regain the deterrence which it lost in Lebanon.

    • 149. 0 0
      I Agree With No. 1
      • Yosemite
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:42

      No arms for Hamas beyond what is necessary to retain civil order. Especially no arms from Iran. Let's stick it out though. On one hand, there is a history of Arab-Israeli conflict. And on the other is the prospect of the destabilization of the current Arab regimes which in all likelihood would not be in the long term interest of Israel as the Arab street is not necessarily behind this initiative. Arab regimes must also recognize that recognition of radical organizations supported by Iran may not be in their long term interests either. Somehow the outcome must be that Israel and the Arab States are all one family. And don't forget the USA and Britain, whom are responsible for developing all that oil and wealth originally and later turned it back over to the Saudis, the Omanis, the Kuwaitis, et. all Arabia too. Let's give it a go and call their bluff. We speak in Arabic too! We'll know it's phony if they ask Israel to change the name to Phillistina or some silly thing!

    • 148. 0 0
      #102 Still laughing
      • Dhimmi Hendrix
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:41

      One point we agree is that Israel does inflate Hamas's sense of self importance. They are insignificant even for Iran which is Israel's main concern at the moment, but unfortunately the Palestinian people voted them in government, if this is inadmissable even for enlightened Palestinians, imagine for Israel. Check out how the Palestinian territories look after one year and a bit of Hamas government!! They are a brancaleonne army with powerful guns. Any developed country has the obligation to protect their citizens from bufoons such as Hamas. This is what Israel is doing. In other words, the Hamas issue is closer to a police, or mental institution issue than a diplomatic or political one. One doesn't have to be a political genius to suss this out, most Arab countries would agree to this, by the way.

    • 147. 0 0
      rather obivous, no?
      • Ernst
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:37

      Would Olmert admit today that Israel would return East-Jerusalem to the state of Palestine? No, but it is equally obvious that this will happen, just like the obvious fact that the Right of Return will not happen in the physical way like Hamas wants it. The negotiations on the Arab initiative haven`t started yet so you cannot expect anyone to give in one inch. That`s a basic fact of negotiation tactics: you go in with strong demands and slowly but surely you work your way to your real, hidden, target.

    • 146. 0 0
      Hey Daniel; what exactly did the Pals
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:37

      have to do with what happened in Germany? Also, it appears that the Jews are getting compensated from Germany for lost property. The int'l community is a tad more astute than trying to lump the two events together. Why should the Pals pay for Europe's madness? They shouldn't. Enough spin and foot dragging. There is no reason why the Pals should not get back the stolen land.

    • 145. 0 0
      Israels real face
      • Tobias
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:36

      Israel is showing its real face to the world. It does not want peace, it wants that the palestinians surrender. What Israeli politicians dont understand is that it will not happen. The only solution where everyone can live in peace is to have a citizenship. That the palestinians dont bring that to the political agenda is astonishing, and it is of great luck for the present government. It would be much harder ot deny a person living next to you citizenship than denying him(her a country. Use the famous logic. It cannot go on like this. Citizenship is the only solution that gives everyone what they want. The whole country.

    • 144. 0 0
      ENDING THE HAMAS STRANGLEHOLD ON PEACE
      • abram
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:35

      Dayan always said the enemy will make peace only when it has more to lose than to gain from war. Right now the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and in the poorer areas of the West Bank have little to lose. And what they do have, they credit to Hamas. This is the equation which must change. Israel must find a way to be the resource not only of blue-collar jobs, but of genuine opportunity and change for the poor Palestinians. Supplanting the role of Hamas and giving the Palestinian lower class something to lose is the key to real peacer.

    • 143. 0 0
      Israel should not even discuss the plan
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:34

      If you start negotiating, you can say no to the ?refugees? but you will have to give something. The Arabs believe they have to give nothing. You have given too much in exchange for nothing.

    • 142. 0 0
      96: Daniel: R of R for Europian and Russians or Pal Refugees?
      • Tupac
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:31

      Which Right of Return are you talking about? The people that left 2000+ years ago or since 1948?

    • 141. 0 0
      Saudi FM
      • Phil Gal
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:30

      Quite clear, if Arabs don't accept Israely peace plan, they clearly don't want peace

    • 140. 0 0
      Do Arabs have to honor their word?
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:29

      The Arab League is untrustworthy. They imply accords can be breached.

    • 139. 0 0
      Saudis
      • Sharonelle
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:28

      It's been pretty obvious for decades that Israel doesn't want peace except on its own terms and that is keeping all the territories it is occupying right now. It's time they recognized that they can't occupy all the territories and treat the people brutally and have peace.

    • 138. 0 0
      If the Arabs wanted peace
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:26

      in the area, they shouldn?t try to impose that plan, would have absorbed the so-called ?refugees? and would urge the pal terrorists to stop terror and meet the commitments they signed.

    • 137. 0 0
      Does Israel want peace?
      • Elie
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:25

      Saudis are right. If Israel really wants peace , it is time to accept as a starting point for negotiations the 2002 Beirut plan. It seems to me that Israel is not interested in peace...the plan exists since 2002. The plan only asks for a " just solution" for the refugees. It seems fair to anybody who wants peace.

    • 136. 0 0
      97 & 100 Alberto: Just because you know how to Google doesn't
      • Tupac
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:25

      does not make you an export on the subject. Here's a history lesson for you: My government broke treaties after treaties with the Native Americans during our land grab and I can fairly say that we our not a Muslim nation.

    • 135. 0 0
      #36 PETER SM, Israel recognised Palestine? Not so
      • Johnboy
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:25

      Israeli politicians have stated that they see a two-state solution as inevitable, that they are interested in thinking about a temporary, borderless Palestinian, or that they might just yesno - maybe - the idea that perhaps a State of Palestine might be possible someday, at a date to be announced, provided all the preconditions are met. Yeah, sure, THEN they'll be quite happy to see a Palestinian State but, please, don't ask for it in writing. No Way. Trust me. After all, I'm a politician. The Pals, on the other hand, have put it in writing. They did so in 1993. At Olso. The Israeli reply, in writing? That they'll agree to *talk* to the PLO in all future, undetermined negotiations. Which, of course, according to the zionists in this talkback the Israelis are now no longer interested in doing.

    • 134. 0 0
      THIS "PEACE PLAN" WILL COST ISRAEL ITS EXISTENCE
      • David
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:24

      They are taking advantage of a leadership thats out of its mind, because a sane government wouldn't swallow this poisonous pill.

    • 133. 0 0
      Let me see if I understood correctly...
      • paul
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:22

      So if Israel doesn't accept the Arab proposal.....including such suicidal points such the right of return,then Israel doesn't want peace.Did I understand correctly?. Wowo!!.....what arrogance.

    • 132. 0 0
      The Saudi FM is wrong, Israel is only rejecting peace......
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:22

      ....if she doesn't make a counter-offer. Nobody can expect from Israel that she will fully accept the Saudi plan. However, if she doesn't make a serious counter- offer, she will leave the world with the impression, that she isn't interested into a fair solution of the conflict and that she is in fact the "hurdle" towards peace. One can only hope that common sense will reach the political establishment in Jerusalem. It's never too late.

    • 131. 0 0
      Indrajaya - here is how it is going to be
      • Chachmeister
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:21

      Let's ignore the facts here 'cause that seems to be your whole raison d'etre on this site. Let's ignore 800,000 no-denomination Arabs (a lot of whom are probably dead now) swelling prodigiously into 5,000,000. Let's ignore the fact that their displacement was mostly of their own doing. Let's ignore the fact that a large chunk of that considerably more reasonable 800,000 migrated to Israel only shortly before the 1948 war thus effectively nullifying refugee status. There is only one piece of information that is relevant any longer and it is this: Bringing 5,000,000 Arabs into Israel would destroy the country. Arguably a prolonged war with the world of Islam would have the same effect but all thing being equal I would rather not go like sheep to the slaughter house. You harp a whole lot about 242 but Arabs only listen to the UN when it is convenient. 1948 proved that.

    • 130. 0 0
      Unrealistic Ultimatum
      • ATLAS
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:21

      This so called right of return amounts to a choice between suicide by or murder of Israel. As long as Arab leaders hold to this view, they may place their so called plan in a place where the sun doesn't shine.

    • 129. 0 0
      And if Israel accepts the proposal,
      • KUTW
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:20

      If Israel accepts the proposal, it would be accepting self-destruction.

    • 128. 0 0
      Wow, a refusal to surrender is a "rejection of peace"
      • David Teich
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:19

      Saudi Arabia, along with the rest of the Arab League, unconditionally declared war in '48 and are still officially at war. What they now say is that there can be no peace unless Israel surrenders. Only then the Arabs might make peace. There's nothing new there, it's just jihad as it's always been. They're more politically savvy than Hamas, not using the word "hudna", but they're after the same thing. No. They can unconditionally end the war they began the same way. Then we'll talk.

    • 127. 0 0
      I thought Oslo was a peace initiative coupled with "road map"
      • r
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:19

      If The Saudis said that Sabbath is on Tuesday that doesn't make it so......

    • 126. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Croatia ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:19

    • 125. 0 0
      A coffee with this??
      • Rafa
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:18

      This proposal has no value. They want Israel to accept all their conditions for nothing in return. All this is BS. AN empty offer. Israel can accept the offer if it excludes the right of return, and if Jerusalem, a city founded by the Jews, stays Israel?s Capital. For the rest, may be. So, Saudi despots, go back to sleep and wake up when you will be elected in a free election.

    • 124. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Lebanon ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:18

    • 123. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Sudan ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:17

    • 122. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Morocco ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:17

    • 121. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Cyprus ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:16

    • 120. 0 0
      # 64 Lynn
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:15

      Lynn, unfortunately both Palestinians and Israelis are showing a tremendous political ambiguity when it comes to their real agenda for the future. This new immigration thing in the Saudi plan, you can easily forget about, that's a non starter anyway. Although from an emotional standpoint I can understand it, if I would be a Palestinian refugee, I would also be ****** to see that "foreigners" are allowed to immigrate into "my" country, but I am not. However, unfortunately it's not a fair world, and millions of other refugees had to suffer the same fate over the past centuries. By the way, just saw your post on the French topic from yesterday: I used quotation marks for the word "englightened". With good reason...:)

    • 119. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Indonesia ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:15

    • 118. 0 0
      re # 68 Sara, should we suspend Turkey ?
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:14

    • 117. 0 0
      Saudi FM totally correct
      • John
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:11

      Zionists extremists should prepare to give up East Jerusalem.

    • 116. 0 0
      Hamas irrelevant: "peace plan" is only a threat
      • Paul Freedman
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:10

      Hamas' ambiguity or Israeli nuclear policy are irrelevant--this is not a Saudi "peace plan" per se but a demand that Israel unilaterally concede on vital national security interests (such as mass Palestinian repatriation labeled "right of return") or face war--that is, a demand that Israel (in exchange for recognition) itself formally recognize its own subservient status as a dhimmi subordinate to the Arab "sea". Saudi Arabia should be politely informed that Israel will not accept or negotiate on the basis of demarches, even those dressed up for PR as "peace offers" and that any following consequences will not stop at the Saudi national border. At that time perhaps Israel could resolve any ambiguity over its nuclear capability.

    • 115. 0 0
      re#68 Sara , could u please answer a simply question !!I
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:10

      Does every nation which does not comply with UN resolutions, should indeed be "suspended" from UN board ?????????????? Or just the Jew State !!!!!!

    • 114. 0 0
      #36 Peter SM; right you are!
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:10

      Dubya is fixin' to set those borders before he leaves, yup, he is. Boy that peace train is moving and getting up speed. A few weeks ago, no talks with Arabs, no talks with NKorea, no talks with Iran. What a difference a day makes, eh? You post as though you have some critical input to the fuel ingredients for the peace train, you don't. You are simply a passenger. Regards.

    • 113. 0 0
      Arab Peace?
      • Ra`anan
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:08

      Israel can not and should not ever go back to pre `67 borders. Cannot and should not give up any part of Jerusalem iether. When a sovereign country is attacked by it neighbours (or even 5 of them) and it captures territory, under international law this is acceptible, even Russia have islands that belong to them in the Japanese sea, that they captured in WW2, Japan is not asking for them back and even if they did, Russia would not hear of it, in fact the rest of the world would would raize an eyebrow. So my dear friends why should Israel give back territories it captured in self defence?? (Just a thought)

    • 112. 0 0
      #34 Hey Cipora; whatever makes you
      • ballistic
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:07

      believe what you posted? Wishful thinking? Well, it appears that the 60 year old circumstances have changed, yup, they have. Dubya and Condi are gonna draw those lines with int'l support whether or not Israel agrees. Why do all these folks from USSR and Europe feel as though they have a right to plop down and then direct everything around them? Well, circumstances will make a monkey eat red pepper, and those circumstances as you outline are now apparent. Despite US support for Israel, not many US voters would vote to have high oil or no oil simply because you want to continue squatting on Pal land. Have tea; the peace train is moving on without you. Regards.

    • 111. 0 0
      Is As Simple As That
      • Benlolo
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:04

      So do as Isay, or else you don't tell the truth... Yes, put in that context who the hell needs all the subtleties and the extended need of negotiations. Do as I say, don't do as I do... Anew norm in diplomacy; except it is not what the diplomacy for two parties requires.

    • 110. 0 0
      To Egyptian
      • Jack
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:03

      There is no way the large majority of Israelis would accept the right of return of Palestinians, in any peace settlement. The Arab states started the 1948 war and in any war there are always refugees. Why is it that of all the wars that have taken place last century the Palestinian refugees are the only ones that still live in camps and are not allowed to integrate, be it in Lebanon, Syria, Egypt etc. Do not ever forget that there were also whole Jewish communities that had to leave the Arab countries post 1948 and were dispersed throughout the world. Just as you would not think it feasible that Jews would return to Cairo and Alexandria (they were there for centuries) it is equally impossible for Arab refugees to return to what is now Israel.

    • 109. 0 0
      Abbas to Olmert
      • Nora
      • 28.03.07
      • 15:02

      Abbas: It`s israel`s best interest to accept the Riyad (Read: Trojan Horse) compromise Olmert: As Peres said, we will not be an obstacle to peace. Abbas: Good. So you accept our Peace in the ME solution (Read: Just peace). Olmert; What do you mean by that? Abbas: It means Jews and Arabs living peacefully together. Olmert:In Israel ? Abbas; No, in Palestine.

    • 108. 0 0
      Indrajaya-#66-your plan is as safe as an Indonesian Airline
      • Daniel Leopold
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:58

      ""Technicality can`t abort the principal premise that they have right to return home like Jews have right to return to Israel. ANSWER THIS FIRST, the arrangement can follow. NOTHING IMPOSSIBLE IF YOU HAVE A GOOD WILL TO DO THE RIGHT THING."" Technicality? You don't know the meaning of the word Indrajaya.Lynn has correctly pointed out that in practical terms the Right of Return is absolute nonsense.This is not merely a technicality. Your proposal is about as safe and sound as an Indonesian Airline Indrajaya

    • 107. 0 0
      Kevin from Baltimore giving rights to the Jews
      • Daniel Leopold
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:51

      ""The answer is: Yes,of course. they have the right also to compensation for the suffering caused by the Nazis on their grandparents and their parents which undoubtedely affected them"" It's so easy to give away rights to the Jews in Germany from the safety of your abode in Baltimore isn't it Kevin? I guess though Jews should tell the world that Palestinians can have their Right to Return when Jews displaced by Nazis and their allies will get their Right to Return to the lands and homes thye lost.See if the "International community" is going to accept this.

    • 106. 0 0
      indrajaya from Jakarta: There is AMBIGUITY regarding IRANIAN ATOM
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:49

      You state with delight: "Iran will have nukes soon". Ahmadinejad states (also with delight) "Iran will PEACEFUL URANIUM. PEACEFUL PLUTONIUM". Whom the world should trust: Suni indrajaya, or Shia Ahmadinejad? Or both, because muslims are always truthful ones?

    • 105. 0 0
      Same old story
      • Ron
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:47

      If Israel surrenders on all fronts and agrees to be the 23rd arab state there will be peace. I am for leaving this group to the tender mercies of the Syrian's and Iranian's.

    • 104. 0 0
      Translation: war will continue until Israel's destruction.
      • Mr. Ami Goldman
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:47

      "No compromise on right of return (of 5 million palestinians)...." "Will not recognize Israel"... Only naif (stupid?) people like the Gideon Levys and the Amira Haasses and their alikes believe that there will be peace between Israel and the Palestines in the next 50 years. So let's keep defensible borders, let's develop our nukes, let's install them in rocket launching subs, let's develop a rocket based force-de-frappe, let's increase our arsenal with more rockets, and screw the Pals. Si vis pacem, pro bellum.

    • 103. 0 0
      IS IT An offer you cant refuse SHEIKH DON CORLEONE ??
      • paul harris
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:46

      WELL SO MUCH FOR THAT KIND OF PEACE PLAN!!! I WONDER WHO WILL PERISH FIRST THE FEUDAL CHIEFS OR ISRAEL ??

    • 102. 0 0
      #87: yeah... well, laugh alone
      • neutral-man
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:46

      apparently, you dont have alue about politics... why is israel so irritated by hamas? whats the big deal? look at the pals, for instance... sharon to the pals was a MUCH MORE fearful figure than all hamas would be to israel.... but arafat and abbas met him. they dont demonize him to the point of stopping talks... on the other hand, israel makes hamas sound MUCH bigger and more powerful than it really is by ignoring it... making it sound like an israeli equal in strength. but if you talked to it, you "deflate" that image, and ignore it over time. israel is the one who keeps putting hamas in the forefront, and giving it WAAAY too much weight. i think israel is doing the PR campaign for them.

    • 101. 0 0
      Egyptian-#81
      • Daniel Leopold
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:45

      ""Recognizing the rights of the refugees and ending the illegal occupation is the only way the Zionists will ever get what they claim to want - peace! However, any honest and informed individual can attest to the reality of Zionist warmongering rather than peace making."" Peace between whom? Palestine and Falastin? Or maybe between Palestine and the Islmaic Republic of Absurdistan. Do you take all of for idiots?

    • 100. 0 0
      re#13 Tupac Not predictions just Quran and History lessons !! P2
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:45

      This is a Muslim tactic that has been used over and over again throughout history with devastating success. Instead of mocking others comments I also strongly recommend you the study of "Al-Takeyya" concept. Which of course, should also guide Israel State, during the peace process.

    • 99. 0 0
      I want my cake, your cake, and to eat it too
      • Avrum
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:44

      So Hamas says "we will not agree to recognition of Israel or peace with it [as it appears in the initiative]. We have no problem with the part of the initiative that calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders and the right of refugees to return." So in simple terms for all the rest of you Israeli bashers and sorry for the capitals but necessary IT DOES NOT MATTER IF ISRAEL GIVES IN 100% OF ALL THE REQUESTS OF HAMAS. THE BOTTOM LINE IS HAMAS WILL CONTINUE TO ERRADICATE ISRAEL FROM THE MAP. Haaretz need no longer have stories for discussion. According to Hamas it's over. No more discussions. Israel F..k Off.

    • 98. 0 0
      ISRAEL SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FROM U.N.
      • Gerald Zang
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:43

      Now Sara, Really!

    • 97. 0 0
      re#13 Tupac Not predictions just Quran and History lessons !! P1
      • Alberto Cohen
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:41

      Being Hamas an Islamist organization. (Please find below Hamas Convenat Art. 6) "The Islamic Resistance Movement is a distinguished Palestinian movement, whose allegiance is to Allah, and whose way of life is Islam. It strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine" Hamas policy should be analyzed under Quran and Muslim perspective. When KT post his "predictions", we was just brinining the obvious for anyone who knows a bit of the Quran and Muslim strategy. It began with Islam's most revered founder, Muhammad. He declared a 10-year "hudna" with the Quraysh tribe that controlled Mecca. Two years into the hudna, Muhammad had acquired enough troops and arms to abrogate the hudna and conquer Mecca ? decimating the Quraysh in the process. This became known as the "Quraysh Model," which defines the meaning of a hudna. When you are militarily at a disadvantage, declare a "hudna" until you are militarily strong enough to discard it and win the war.

    • 96. 0 0
      The Right of Return...to war
      • Daniel Leopold
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:39

      Those who pontificate the so called Right of Return want war not peace

    • 95. 0 0
      #74 Hey "neutral-man": If you were "neutral", you would condemn..
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:39

      OFFICIALLY PROCLAIMED AMBIGUITY OF HAMAS. Today you are "neutral-man". Are you usually "neutral observer"?

    • 94. 0 0
      Haniyeh to Arab leaders: Don't compromise on right of return
      • Gerald Zang
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:34

      The Right of Return of Jewish refugees from Arab countries and from the Palestinian Entity should not be compromised either. There are more Jewish refugees than true Palestinian refugees, but the Jewish refugees have adjusted and don't make so much noise! Not everyone who calls himself "Palestinian" is a Palestinian. It's the big lie! True pALESTINIANS are a minority, and are not dispersed all over the globe!

    • 93. 0 0
      #77: i want a little of whatever it is you're on!
      • neutral-man
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:34

      boy, do you have your info MIXED UP! these israeli-arabs are fighting within israel to be ACCEPTED into the israeli society... they are not given adequate funding for their villages, and they are treated like 10th grade citizens! have you been reading haaretz????? have you been reading about the new residency law? well, read it before you start blabbering. its in an article TODAY, here in haaretz!

    • 92. 0 0
      THIS IS TURNING INTO A MAD HOUSE
      • Ian
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:32

      The arab league seems to think that Israel should accept a plan that contains a poison pill,viz the 'return'of the descendants of palestinian arab refugees to Israel. Hamas's Ismail Haniyeh effectively says that even if Israel does accept and commit suicide they will just continue with terrorism until Israel expires. Fatah's Abbas says that this is a great chance for peace,presumably when Israel has disappeared. This whole thing stinks of being a trap for Israel.In my oppinion the Israeli government should simply say no to the plan and tell the Arab League to come back when it has something sensible to propose that is on the right side of acceptable to Israel.I SIMPLY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE ARAB LEAGUE IS SINCERE.

    • 91. 0 0
      #72 - lakshmi Get Real!!!
      • Russ
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:30

      Stop bombing them. Stop firing rockets. Stop kidnapping. Stop Stop Stop If you stop poking the dog through the fence, the dog wil stop trying to bite. Try and live like "civilzed" people in the 21st century, not like a bunch of primitive tent dwellers. And recognnize "them". Trust me, Israel is NOT going to go away.

    • 90. 0 0
      right of return is GOD GIVEN!
      • neutral-man
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:30

      dont tell me you truly believe that throwing people out of their homes over a 5k year old claim, and then denying them even the dignity of the RoR, is even LOGICAL or FAIR in your mind!

    • 89. 0 0
      What a total waste of time
      • Nechama
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:28

      Having so called 'peace' talks with these Arabs is nothing but a complete waste of time, and downright silly. They never want peace. Even when they 'talk' 'peace', they mean the destruction of Israel. Diplomats should all just go home and wait for the next war. Arabs will never get their so called 'right of return' (to which they have no right in the first place) and they will never get Jerusalem as the capital of their non-existant state. Israel will remain a Jewish state, because that is the whole point. And Jerusalem will remain in Israel.

    • 88. 0 0
      # 14 Cipora....WOW ...if you could write that in Arabic now
      • The Equalizer
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:27

      Your writing is like a breath of fresh air, logic and reason....that you should have a column of your own and translated into Arabic and leaflets spread throughout the Arab world. These people have Hamas and Hezbollah as their worst enemy....not Israel.

    • 87. 0 0
      # 72 Made me laugh!!
      • Dhimmi Hendrix
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:25

      Hamas impatient with Israel???!!!! Hamas is the most inept enemy Israel has ever faced, the only thing that they have managed to do for the Palestinians is to worsen their lives. Their ineptness has actually strenthenned Israel's diplomacy, and showed the world that because of Hamas it is impossible to reach any compromise with the PA. How can an organization who pays families for their children to explode themselves in order to kill innocent civilians speak about "Israeli crimes"?? Who is loosing their patience is the Palestinian people with Hamas's incapacity of governing their own people.

    • 86. 0 0
      #58: HAH!!! I laugh in your face!
      • neutral-man
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:23

      you say the country cant handle them, huh... well, how come israel is shuttling jews from all over the world, day and night, creating facts on the ground... where do these people go? there's no land? well, it WAS there friggin' land 50+ yrs ago, i think they have the right to come back, no? another thing, genius... given the choice, how many do you REALLY think will leave their lives in europe or the US or anywhere to come back? they just want the RIGHT of return, but it doesnt mean they'll exercise it.... but its good to know its there.

    • 85. 0 0
      Hamas will shoot themselves in the foot, every time
      • The Equalizer
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:21

      They cannot "pull the trigger" on peace. This is more than being stubborn and gaining bargaining chips for negotiation. This is a hard-core philosophy that pervades the terrorist mind-set and it will not allow Israel to be able to make concessions that the majority of Palestinians need and want. Blame HAMAS not ISRAEL.

    • 84. 0 0
      israel sends two large pumps to gaza
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:19

      to help with the sewerage floods that has killed many in that wretched hole. that proves israel is occupying gaza.

    • 83. 0 0
      "RIGHT OF RETURN" OR WAR?
      • SAM
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:17

      WAR IS COMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • 82. 0 0
      #77 Sara
      • Peter Nagy
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:13

      Sara I like you too. Besides Theodor Herzl was Hungarian and not Austrian.

    • 81. 0 0
      Indeed
      • Egyptian
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:11

      I'm delighted that the elected government of Palestine is sticking to the internationally legally enshrined rights of the refugees to return to their native land. Recognizing the rights of the refugees and ending the illegal occupation is the only way the Zionists will ever get what they claim to want - peace! However, any honest and informed individual can attest to the reality of Zionist warmongering rather than peace making.

    • 80. 0 0
      Right of return
      • Jacques
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:07

      In the early twenties, nearly a million Greeks were driven out of Turkey. At the same time nearly a million Turks were driven out of Thessalonika (Greece). Do these all have the right of return? Between 1947 and the turn of the century, over 1 million Jews were driven out of Arab and Moslem countries. Calculated on the same basis as Palestinian refugees (ie. including children, grandchildren and great grandchildren) these now number well over four million. Do they have the right of return? And why stop there? Before Islam, Medina had a huge Jewish population as did all the oases of North Arabia. All were driven out or forcibly converted. Do those driven out of Arabia have the right of return? The answer must be fair COMPENSATION for lost homes and property both for Arabs and Jews not "right of return".

    • 79. 0 0
      Haniyeh strengthens settlers......
      • Esther
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:06

      By demanding return of Pal refugees to Israel proper, Haniyeh is making peace in our times an impossibility. That is the cardinal point on which Israel cannot compromise. Hamas is indeed the best friend of the settlers and the extreme right wing in Israel.

    • 78. 0 0
      Sheket Israelim! A.HASS & G.LEVY are writing that AMBIGUITY......
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 14:03

      ...of HAMAS is a great step towards peace.

    • 77. 0 0
      Sick and tired...
      • Maimon
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:53

      It is time for the Arabs in Israel and the territories to decide on whic for to stand. Either they can stand with their Arab "brothers" who deliberately has kept the "refugees" in misery because of their racism and to use them as a bargaining chip. If so they should prepare for war. Or they can root with the only ME country that actually care the least bit for their fate. There is NO peace with your leaders, stick with them and eventually you wil end up very, very bad.. If they will ever bring any dramatic change it will be for the worse, and they may very will do that, and you will join the "refugees" who are still in bloody camps? Ask yourself: Where are the Jewish refugees that got kicked out of the Arabian countries?? Still in refugee camps?

    • 76. 0 0
      #72 Poor deluded Lakshmi
      • Star of David
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:49

      Since when is the Unity Goverment a reliable source of information, oh lakshmi. Since u are nervous about telling us where u are from, i can only say that the news u get in your part of the world cannot, then, possibly be of any consequence.

    • 75. 0 0
      #38 the future of Gaza
      • chaloum
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:49

      I agree with Absum; Gaza must be detached from the Palestine: or creating 2 Pal states one in Gaza, one in the West Bank, or annexed to Egypt.

    • 74. 0 0
      lets recount the FACTS before we blabber, shall we?
      • neutral-man
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:42

      israel occupies territories.... throws people out, who become 10th grade refugees in countries that hates them.... and they (israel) are pissed when someone stands up to ask for rights???? if it were a jew in zimbabwe, who was raised and reared there, then he would have MORE claim to land that was ALWAYS in the family of a palestinian family, for generations..... oh yeah, democracy! hey, kill those bastards for even thinking of civil, or worse, HUMAN rights!

    • 73. 0 0
      # 29 Do decendent of German Jews refugees..
      • Kevin
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:41

      Zionist for ever wrote: "Are the adult decendents of German jews refugees like their grandpearents were and do they have a right to return to Germany and move into the old family home?" The answer is: Yes,of course. they have the right also to compensation for the suffering caused by the Nazis on their grandparents and their parents which undoubtedely affected them.

    • 72. 0 0
      HAMAS IS VERY PATIENT WITH ISRAEL
      • lakshmi
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:34

      Today,with all the journalistic reports and information systems the whole world knows about Israel' crimes against humanity. We read 2 things:(1)The Unity Government has documented Israel's crimes against the Palestinian people and plan to distribute it to the world community. (2)Committees are being struck at the U.N.to examine the question of Israel's crimes against humanity(latest report). In view of all this,we in the world community outside of Israel and its supporters believe that Hamas is being extremely patient in its dealings with Israel.We don't any longer rely on Israeli propaganda or the word of its supporters to tell us what is going on.It is not like the old days. Israel has been found out and sooner or later must acknowledge its crimes before the world community can accept it amongst the family of nations.

    • 71. 0 0
      Abbas,Houdini,Charlton Heston and Olmert
      • Ronnie Wolman
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:32

      Abbas is a magician.Before he went to Mecca he owned the ME.He had the Americans eating out of his hands,the extremists were all marginalized and he could have written his own ticket.Now probably because of fear or stupidity he gave the whole shmear to Hamas. Another dead end for the Palestinians. Unbelievable.Or maybe it isnt.Its been quite traditional for the Palestinians to throw away good.Maybe that just cant handle it.Arafat did it and now Abbas has done it.Snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory is what they both can hang their scarves on. With Abbas Plus Hamas Equaling Hamas,now we have Mr Bonehead Haniyeh,another winner. Olmert must be going to shul and getting ready for passover knowing he needs no lambs blood on his door,G-d has already spoken.

    • 70. 0 0
      Alicia #62 Don't worry.
      • Tzfonit
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:28

      We have been protecting our right to exist, not caving in, and being protective of our vital existence for the past 60 years. Don't worry. We have no intention of doing anything other than that now, either.

    • 69. 0 0
      Compromise and Peace
      • RAB
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:26

      The leaders of Hamas know that after 60 years of Jewish ownership and development of Eretz Israel, that those areas abandoned by arabs during the War of Independence are no longer arab houses. What was once barren desert, infested swampland and stone bald hills have become lush farms and orchards, tree covered hilltops and Jewish communities, towns, cities. It is easy to see these days where is Jewish territory and where is arab territory. Just look for where the green and the trees and tall buildings are, and you will know who lives where. Hamas has Gaza, given to them unilaterally by Israel as a gift to see what they will do with it. Have they turned it into a paradise? And they actually think to get Judea and Samaria and then flood the rest of the land with his poor, unskilled refugee who would rather kill another Jew than take care of what land he already has? Let Hamas compromise and seek peace and be good stewards of what they have now, and let trust and good will grow first.

    • 68. 0 0
      ISRAEL SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FROM U.N.
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:24

      Since Israel is absolutely dependent on U.N. Resolution 181 for its admission as a State unde International Law,the General Assembly should move for a suspension until Israel complies with all U.N.Resolutions starting with 181,242. Israel's blatant violation of all U.N. Resolutions and the Geneva Convention are legion and well documented. The General Assembly must move NOW for the suspension .

    • 67. 0 0
      Destroy Hamas before it is too late
      • Markus Grafenburg
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:10

      ... but wisely and without harming the Palestinian population!

    • 66. 0 0
      # 58, LYNN
      • indrajaya
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:02

      ..."Please tell me where five or six million people will live?..." Technicality can't abort the principal premise that they have right to return home like Jews have right to return to Israel. ANSWER THIS FIRST, the arrangement can follow. NOTHING IMPOSSIBLE IF YOU HAVE A GOOD WILL TO DO THE RIGHT THING. That's why you need to negotiate and talk to your enemy.

    • 65. 0 0
      indra,Maureen, VIPER, Khalid Amayreh support even AMBIGOUS HAMAS.
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 13:00

      For them shameful AMBIGUITY is not a problem.

    • 64. 0 0
      To Swiss and Cipora
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:59

      According to Arab sources, a new resolution has been added to the Saudi Plan. It would demand that Israel end all immigration of Jews into the State. What kind of demand is that? Now, the Arabs seem to want to run Israel and its gov as well. This is ridiculous!!!

    • 63. 0 0
      They will negociate with us in good faith if we promise to die!
      • Steven
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:58

      You see they want all of the 67 lands. They do not take blame or feel they should loose anything with all the blood that they spilt. Next, if we take in people that will out vote us, they will let us "live" until then. Some peace partner!!

    • 62. 0 0
      FREEZE!
      • Alicia
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:56

      My beloved Israel, since Hamas is not co-operative with Israel, but is dictating the conditions it wants Israel to comply to, then what keeps Israel from responding to Hamas in the same measure? Israel; stay firm, prioratize Israel's right to exist, focus exclusively on this and be protective of every measure that supports Israel's vital existance. IF you start caving in and compromising on yourself Israel, the Israeli Maiden will soon find herself in a Moslem marriage, where women acc. to the Qur'an rank fourth; after dogs.

    • 61. 0 0
      #23 American living here
      • Israeli living here
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:53

      Why are you living here as a foreigner? Take out citizenship. Who or what are you hiding from?

    • 60. 0 0
      150 ISRAEL A ROGUE NATION
      • sara
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:51

      Hamas knows it is dealing with a brutal illegal regime that understands only violence.Afterall, Israel was founded in violence and racism.The Austrian Jew,author of Der Judenstaat(1896)and founder of Zionism clearly stated that the Zionist state once established would defend civilisation against the barbarians.And,the Zionist leaders never wavered in that:the Jewish Agency, the Terrorist organisations like Zergun,the Stern Gang(the earliest experts in history of the Car bomb) and small armed groups that terrorised the indigenous Palestinian population,and drove them out.See historian Ilan Pappe's The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Now,the label has changed to' Israel',but the policy continues.Since 1967 when Israel has violated all U.N. Resolutions and continues its policy of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine,it does not deserve to be among the civilised nations.It is like the former apartheid regime of South Africa.Hamas knows who and what it is dealing with.A rogue nation.

    • 59. 0 0
      # 46 Swiss
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:50

      I am amazed that you didn't see this one coming. Meshal should not even be allowed to make any decisions. Based upon his Syrian ties, he should not be part of any decision in regards to Pals. Haniyeh is keeping a very low profile. He knows he will never accept the Saudi Plan.

    • 58. 0 0
      # 23 Right of return
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:44

      is stupid. Please tell me where five or six million people will live? Where they will find employment? Which Gov will give them medical care? which hospitals will they go to? It is the dumbest suggestion to date. It is ECONOMICALLY unfeasible for this to happen. It would absolutely destroy both of the States. People who think with their emotions over this issue should look at the hard part. What country in the EU would allow that? NONE!! They are too small to deal with such an influx of people.

    • 57. 0 0
      # 6 Marwan
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:36

      Yes, they should be ashamed. You can bet they just caused a more stubborn and arrogant Hamas by even speaking to them. Smart move.

    • 56. 0 0
      Thief ARAFAT was AMBIGOUS TOO: in ENGLISH he recognized ISRAEL...
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:35

      right to exist, in ARABIC he denied it. But what about MONEY, here Arafat was absolutely UNAMBIGOUS: MONEY HAD BEEN ACCUMULATED ON HIS BANK ACCOUNTS. With HAMAS-HANIYEH we do not see much difference: AMBIGUITY is the remedy to get MONEY as AID. Money will be partialy used for TERRORISM, and partialy stolen, just as in time of thief Arafat. The "Palestinian" History repeats itself.

    • 55. 0 0
      Hamas doesn't want peace, they want Israel.
      • Lynn
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:33

      Nothing less will ever be acceptable to them.

    • 54. 0 0
      Same old same old
      • HK
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:30

      "Israel and the United States have not rejected the initiative but expressed reservations" "Hamas has not rejected the initiative but expressed reservations" Thank God somebody isn't fooled by the Zionist press.

    • 53. 0 0
      Hamas sends message that killing Israelis is 'more precious' than
      • Ken Jurist
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:14

      Where is Gideon Levy and Amira Hass now. http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Security/11004.htm Hamas sends message that killing Israelis is 'more precious' than children March 25, 2007

    • 52. 0 0
      Hamas can do what it wants...
      • Michael J. Nelson
      • 28.03.07
      • 12:04

      Hamas can do what it wants, Israel will never allow millions of "refugees" to flood into Israel and make the Jews a minority in their own state. Hamas knows this, IJ knows this, and the world knows this. Also, Jerusalem is not up for negotiation, and Hamas has to accept that too. Its that simple! Everything else can be negotiated.

    • 51. 0 0
      Ambiguilty of ambiguity
      • S
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:50

      To us and to themselves.

    • 50. 0 0
      Hamas knows Gideon Levy, Amira Hass, Aloni, will support them
      • Ken Jurist
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:34

      Hamas is smart, they know it doesn't matter how many Jews they kill or the hatred they preach. The left in Israel will always support them. There's a great article called, The Left's support for Palestinian terrorism. It goes into detail about everything i'm talking about.

    • 49. 0 0
      you don't need to agree to have peace
      • VIPER
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:20

      alot of us do things we don't recognise but we don't fight about it, hamas will not embarass itself to the arab world if all is accepted, this would make hamas look like fools and the arab nations will give up on them if they break it. israel needs to say yes to the plan and wait for them to reneg, if they don't and peace is acheived then it's a win win.

    • 48. 0 0
      #40PeterSM, And of course you are a dinki di Ausie?
      • Maureen Ann
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:11

      Step outside of your blinkered view of Australians, Peter.

    • 47. 0 0
      indrajaya
      • tommy suharto
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:07

      we are unable to function without the west.whenever there is a catastrophe we have to wait for the west to take the initiative.so what is all this bluster about? are you seeking to give the javanese a bad name? you do not like us.are you a fifth columnist sabotaging teh javanese nation?

    • 46. 0 0
      Simply not good enough, Mr. Hanijeh
      • Swiss (Dino)
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:03

      The word ambiguity is the natural antipode to the word confidance. It is therefore exactly the thing we don't need to make progress on the way to peace. Because missing confidance on both sides is the root problem of the ME conflict.

    • 45. 0 0
      Concessions on both sides
      • Tzfonit
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:01

      Both sides are going to have to enter negotiations knowing they will have to make concessions, because that is what negotiating is all about. Hamas is now caught between the hammer and the anvil - reluctant to refuse, lset they lose Saudi support, and reluctant to agree to all issues for fear of appearing that they are giving in to Isarel. But there is a limit to how long they can keep silent without losing world support. Both sides are going to have to be prepared to compromise even red line issues such as Jerusalem, the refugees, and recognition of Israel. Entering negotiations with one's mind made up already negates the whole purpose.

    • 44. 0 0
      the hatred for israel can never end
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 11:00

      so let us examine the contention that the gazans want a hudna.they can hate us and have a hudna at the same time.that is no problem. but what is stopping them from having a hudna without further ado?stop attacking us and we will forget about your existence.

    • 43. 0 0
      UNSC# 242 ORDERS A WITHDRAWAL FIRST
      • indrajaya
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:57

      Not the opposite: RECOGNIZING ISRAEL FIRST, then WITHDRAWAL.

    • 42. 0 0
      look at the history of the gazans in the 1950s
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:55

      they attacked israel repeatedly.they killed civilians in israel regularly.as is the situation now we were not in occupation of gaza in the 1950s. why believe in the good-will of gaza?

    • 41. 0 0
      ali tosefta "gaza wants peace with israel"
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:52

      we are out of gaza.why do they fire rockets at us?why did they kill in eilat? if they want peace with us why do they not just ignore israel and get on with their lives?

    • 40. 0 0
      #33.Have you got an Australian passport as well.My my?
      • PETERSM
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:50

      You really do have your getaway all covered.No wonder you are such a hero.We really do believe you are an Australian,honest.

    • 39. 0 0
      why would ali tosefta go out of his way
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:48

      and label israel an occupier of gaza?as with lebanon we withdrew to the last inch of the bloody place. ali tosefta is a truly wretched man.

    • 38. 0 0
      the future of gaza
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:45

      who is going to give these barbarians employment?israel would have been the ideal source of work but we would never have them enter israel again. the future for gaza is a connection with egypt.the only sane solution is for egypt to take over gaza.

    • 37. 0 0
      Israel Has Recognized "Palestine"
      • Dyinglikeflies
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:44

      Israel has long publicly stated it will accept a 2 state solution (albeit reluctantly), so all the clap-trap about how Israel has to go first in recognizing the national rights of the Palestinians is disingenuous, a lie. Hamas maintains rejection as a core principle, not negotiable now or ever. To them, the land between the Jordan and the sea must be under Islamic sovereignty, as part of the political Umma. There is no "peace train". Until the Palestinian body politic grows up, and the Arabs as a whole realize that maintaining the area as a hothouse for the manifestation of their continuing "righteous rage" against colonialism and the loss of the Caliphate is a senseless and cruel historical joke with the victims the Palestinians themselves, things will stay as they are. This could go on for centuries.

    • 36. 0 0
      Sam Israel recognises a Palestinian state with borders to be
      • PETER SM
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:43

      determined. Have a nice day.

    • 35. 0 0
      ali tosefta"israel goes into gaza at will"
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:39

      therefore continues ali that means there is an occupation of gaza. but is that logical?do israelis wnat to have anything to do with that hell-hole? no the answer is we thump them when they attack us with qassem rockets.no israeli would want to enter that stinking hole. so why is tosefta inciting against the jewish nation?who knows.

    • 34. 0 0
      #23, American not living here
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:38

      If you wait till all the refugees return, there will be no Israel to recognize. Do you think we will let you do this to us? Do you think we are mentaly impared? If you do not agree to a peaceful solution to the conflict, you just might find a totally desolate, forlon land which you can call Palestine or the second Naqba. Whatever you call it, it will never really belong to you, and you will never savour the fruits of the land. Your victory will be your defeat. Enjoy it to the bitter end.

    • 33. 0 0
      #26
      • Australian
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:38

      Yes, Hamas may be a little fanatic, but how about the hundreds of thousands of Talmudic settlers who demand enslavement or expulsion or extermination of non-Jews pursuant Biblical teachings? Can you be honest with yourself and answer my question honestly?

    • 32. 0 0
      Peter SM, Israel never recognized Palestine
      • Sam
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:36

      you are not telling the truth? Israel never recognized Palestine. If Israel recognized Palestine as you claim, then why are those hundrds of Jewish-only colonies in the West Bank? So, it is either you are ignorant of the facts or deliberately lying. Have a good day.

    • 31. 0 0
      Deja vu
      • ScotGuy
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:36

      We've seen this before with Arafat, smiling to the west at their faces, shouting Jihad when they turn their backs, crying like babies when anyone reacts. Terror is their business, that's how all the funding comes in, why would they ever change? In order to get more money to buy arms they'll say anything to the west (after all they are deluded it is a holy war so anything goes). Oh yes! it is to buy arms: their arsenal is growing while their people die in sewage tsunamis, in IDF incursions which they call upon themselves and by the poverty they are causing for not wanting to engage in a serious peace process. Inteligent Palestinians have sussed them out and gradually the less educated ones will get to understand who stood behind the pre-election "charity" they gave out. These guys are the major clowns in Middle East politics, the sooner they are made irrelevant the better for all parties serioulsy engaged in improving the quality of life in the region.

    • 30. 0 0
      ali tosefta and the gaza "occupation"
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:35

      1 the palestinians have a gate to egypt that is nominally controlled by the europeans. 2 these two arab countries have a direct point of contact.in practice the europeans are irrelevant.the arabs do as they please. 3 there is no israeli presence in gaza. 4 the power supply has nothing to do with the occupation.gaza is welcome to produce its own power.let the saudis build a station in the wretched place.

    • 29. 0 0
      RE:23
      • zionist forever
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:33

      Israel has agreed to the creation of a palestian state its a matter working out the politics. Israel does exist right now. The occupation is not illigal Israel is not obligated to give up anything unless it is in exchange for recognition of Israel and a just and lasting peace in secure and recognised borders thanks to Hamas Israel has non of those things when Hamas end terror, recognise Israel and negotiate then things will change. The UN resolutions which deal with refugees are General Assembly resolutions which are glorfied non binding proposals. Even if Israel recognised in princible a refugee return then fine let the refugees return but not their adult grandchildren how can a baby born in 2007 be just as much a refugee as a baby born in 1948. Are the adult decendents of German jews refugees like their grandpearents were and do they have a right to return to Germany and move into the old family home? The arabs are living in a fantasy world.

    • 28. 0 0
      3#VITTORIO
      • alonitzafoni
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:29

      WHY SHOULD THEY CARE, THEY WOULD RATHER LIVE UNDER SHARIA LAW AND TURN A BLIND EYE TOO JIHADIST ASPIRATIONS,UNTIL ITS TOO LATE,BUT BY THEN I WONT FEEL AN OUNCE OF PITY FOR THE ISRAEL BASHING EU COUNTRIES!!!

    • 27. 0 0
      what is there in hamas's history that would persuade us
      • lord byron
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:28

      they want to live in peace with israel?they sprang up from the egyptian moslem brotherhood which shows an extreme hatred for the jewish people.

    • 26. 0 0
      HAMAS ARE ISLAMIC FANATICS!!!
      • alonitzafoni
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:27

      HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO NEGOTIATE PEACE WITH THEM???

    • 25. 0 0
      #23 Hmas should only recognise Israel if the wan't peace.
      • PETER SM
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:26

      If they want to continue their war their choice and clearly yours as expressed by your multi identity hateposts.. Israel has already recognised Palestine Khalid.

    • 24. 0 0
      ali tosefta :"there were twice as many pals in palestine
      • absum
      • 28.03.07
      • 10:18

      as there were jews" so what?we have to deal with the reality today.there are over 5.25 million jews in the homeland.what importance is there in the numbers 70 years ago?

    • 23. 0 0
      why should Hamas recongize Israel when
      • American living here
      • 28.03.07
      • 09:51

      Israel doesn't recognize Palestine. I see Hamas's stand as pure common sense. If I were Hamas or Fatah, I would never ever recognize Israel until Israel ends all is occupation, and allows the refugees to return.

    • 22. 0 0
      #18, KA, Hamas has clarity, it is just not moral
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 28.03.07
      • 09:33

    • 21. 0 0
      No Peace--No Recognition
      • James
      • 28.03.07
      • 08:48

      If all of these Hamas spokes people truly represent Hamas, then the world should understand what needs to be accomplished. Give the Palestinians their state. Nothing more, nothing less. No East Jerusalem, no reparations, definitely no right of return(that was never going to happen and is only a propaganda move. Now wait for the first murder bomber or missile to fall into Israel and then destroy this Palestinian state.

    • 20. 0 0
      Khori..maybe Hamas should borrow some of your
      • KA
      • 28.03.07
      • 08:39

      moral clarity, Marwan.!!!

    • 19. 0 0
      #5 Hey Nikos
      • therealstory
      • 28.03.07
      • 08:37

      This conflict has NOTHING to do with land (as demonstrated by gaza pull-out and lebanon border). There always will be a centimeter of land that will be used to justify the continuation of jihad until Israel is destroyed AND THEN the arabs will start to kill each other as demonstrated in iraq. The arab legue nations need to ABSORB their refugees as EQUAL citizens like the West has done with the Jews expelled from arab lands.

    • 18. 0 0
      No Ambiguity
      • therealstory
      • 28.03.07
      • 08:27

      There is no ambiguity in hamas's stance. They have and always will stand for the destruction of Israel. This is a hollow deal - the king of saudi is used to getting his own way !!! There can be no piece until Israel knows what she is, takes and defends what is hers.

    • 17. 0 0
      they reject the parts recognizing Israel's right to exist !
      • redmike
      • 28.03.07
      • 08:06

      'Islam will enter every house' Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar: Religion of Islam will take over entire world Islam will enter "every house" and become the dominant religion across the entire planet, Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar said during a mass rally in Gaza this week. Commenting on Zahar's comments, PMW Director Itamar Marcus and Associate Director Barbara Crook wrote: "While the Hamas goal of destroying Israel is well known, its aspiration for Islamic subjugation of the entire world is just as basic to Hamas dogma." "Both aims appear in the Hamas Charter as God's irrepressible will, and both aims were reiterated this week by senior Hamas leader and former PA foreign minister Mahmoud al-Zahar," they added.

    • 16. 0 0
      HAMAS .No tikky no laundry.Their call,for or against peace
      • PETER SM
      • 28.03.07
      • 07:57

      They are either on the peace train or off. There is no third option.

    • 15. 0 0
      HAMAS LEARNED THE HARD WAY
      • indrajaya
      • 28.03.07
      • 07:52

      HAMAS has learned from Arafat's mistakes when he recognize Israel unilaterally. When Rabin got killed, Israel "forgot" its commitment, expanding its settlements and strengthen its grip on occupied territories. Recognition should be from both sides at the same TIME, not unilaterally.

    • 14. 0 0
      Hamas, you are not being ambiguous one bit
      • Cipora Julianna Kohn
      • 28.03.07
      • 07:45

      You were terrorists before, you are terrorists now, and you intend to be terrorists in the future. You subscribe to the three no's of Khartoum: no recognition, no negotiations, no peace. You have your infamous covenant which calls for the destruction of Israel through jihad, and which disavows international agreements as unacceptable under sharia. You send your kids to jihad school where they learn day in and day out that martyrdom is the highest calling and the surest way to paradise. You worship death the way others worship G-d. You love no one, not even yourselves.

    • 13. 0 0
      #1 KT in Flordia: Can you also tell me who wins the Final 4?
      • Tupac
      • 28.03.07
      • 07:38

      However, they may not be against Arabs peace agreements as an Independant Palestinian State will allow Hamas to import arms from Iran, Hezbollah, etc. Thus, this will provide a launch pad for them to liberate the rest of "Palestine" from the "Zionists." Syria may also play the same game in a sense. They will "make peace" with Israel, retrieve the Golan, and then break relations with Israel." --------- Sounds like your a physcic so tell me do the Gators win next week?

    • 12. 0 0
      #6Marwan The actions of the...
      • Maureen Ann
      • 28.03.07
      • 07:28

      IDF has spoken volumes, to the world of it's terrorist activities. Are you forgetting?

    • 11. 0 0
      RE: 1
      • zionist forever
      • 28.03.07
      • 06:16

      I agree about Hamas and Syria the arab plan is just the starting point for them. If Hamas want to continue to exist then they cannot give up their cause of liberating all of Palestine from the zionists for them a state in the 1967 border is just a starting point .. instead of launching their war from areas patroled by the IDF they have their own country and they will legaly be permited to buy some weaponry so no need for smuggling tunnels. With Syria Assad is in Irans pocket even though he would get the Golan with the arab plan he cant give up his support for groups like hamas so he can be friends with Israel and he certainly cant risk his friendship with Iran for the sake of peace with Israel. He will do a Hitler making promises to Chamberlin he never intend to keep. Iran has paid bills that Syria owed to Russia, it sells Syria Iranian made weaponry, they have signed agreements that you attack one of us you attack us both Assad cant risk giving up all that and Iran hasnt signed up.

    • 10. 0 0
      hamas isn't being ambigous
      • Adrian de Klerk
      • 28.03.07
      • 06:15

      Infact hamas is just being a little more muted with their real intentions.

    • 9. 0 0
      The endgame with Hamas is obvious as never before...
      • Dr. L. Brnd
      • 28.03.07
      • 06:12

      Whether via the Road Map, UN resolutions, so-called "Saudi Plan" or Oslo, the end-point for whatever Israeli concessions are involved is the exactly the same: peace treaty, diplomatic relations, recognition of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, normalization. Hamas (and Islamic Jihad) states -- once again -- that it is opposed to ALL of these, no matter what Israel gives up, and thus to all the peace processes on the table. This is their core value, not a "negotiating position". Hamas is the elected goverment of the Palestinians. Therefore, it is pointless to proceed with any peace plans, much less the idiotic "Horizons" dialog. The phony negotiations with the unrepresentative and endlessly dishonest Abbas are delaying what is the only practical path to eventual peace -- the complete destruction of Hamas and its membership, just as Nazism had to be completely annihilated to allow peace to come to Europe. Time to wake up, and face facts. Rice has nothing to contribute.

    • 8. 0 0
      Well, it is not such a high price to pay: We, Hamas, will
      • Avi
      • 28.03.07
      • 06:12

      be silent during the summit, while they, Saudi Arabia will fund us; pay us money. It is all part of the deal - good money for keeping silent for a few days. Wow, I would do the same.

    • 7. 0 0
      Hamas' moral ambiguity
      • Marwan مروان خوري
      • 28.03.07
      • 06:08

    • 6. 0 0
      I guess they have a hard time with a concept of peace
      • Marwan مروان خوري
      • 28.03.07
      • 06:07

      What a joke. All Hamas has to do is accept the most basic requirements of non-violence and commitment to respecting Israel. Without even those basic notions this so-called "moderate" government is anyting but. This is moral ambuguity and speaks volumes about the the true character of this terror group. Norway and other nations dealing with Hamas should be ashamed.

    • 5. 0 0
      Hamas adopt "ambiguity policy"
      • Nikos Retsos
      • 28.03.07
      • 05:58

      If Israel continues to isolate Hamas and prohibit any contact with any foreign emisary who meet with Hamas, what is hamas supposed to do? Recognize Israel unconditionally, then engage in infinite fruitless negotiations like Fatah has done for the last 10 years for nothing! If they do that, the West Bank will be by then 90% settled by Israelis. Remember: Posetion is 90% of the law! The Israeli-Palestinian problem is about land. Hamas cannot give up all claims upfront and then wait for scraps of land unwanted by Israelis as a take-it-/or-leave-it peace settlement offer. The "ambiguity policy", therefore, is correct until Israel puts a peace plan on the table. And if history is an indicator, Israel doesn't plan to offer the Palestinians anything they can live with. The ball [the land] is on the Israelis hand. The Israeli attitude toward Hamas "You are terrorists and you deserve nothing" won't bring peace in Middle East. And Iraq and Lebanon show a need for new thinking in Israel.

    • 4. 0 0
      Peace Plan?
      • Edifice
      • 28.03.07
      • 05:30

      Lets see if I got this straight. Israel agrees to this suicide peace plan including the "right of return" And for this Hamas member of parliament al-Bardawil says "we will not agree to recognition of Israel or peace with it." No more need be said.

    • 3. 0 0
      ONLY ISLAMOFACSISTS CAN TELL "We adopt ambiguity policy'"
      • Vittorio
      • 28.03.07
      • 05:22

      Ones who are honest would never tell "We adopt 'ambiguity policy'. Do you think that Israel Bashers will express at least "surprise"? I believe that their hatred towards JEWS is the basis of their attitude. They jusyify HAMAS, NASRALLAH-HESBALLAH and AHMADINEJAD-IRAN. They would accept HITLER 70 years ago. Go ahead, shameful VIPERS.

    • 2. 0 0
      Ha! Hamas copying Israel's ambiguity of nukes
      • Jon
      • 28.03.07
      • 05:10

      The only difference is that Israel has no record of having nukes, so it works based on principles of assuming status quo. Hamas has a record of wanting to destroy Israel and not accepting what is in this peace charter, in fact its against their own charter. Ambiguity does not work in such circumstances. Yet again, a well thought-out plan to play word games on the international community while not changing their stance. But I don't need to tell anyone this, it seems like they are admitting still that they can never have peace with Israel.

    • 1. 0 0
      Hamas makes it so much easier
      • KT
      • 28.03.07
      • 04:15

      By accepting peace with Israel, Hamas will no longer be Hamas. In fact Hamas in Spanish (Jamas) means never - which seems appropriate. They will never accept Israel. However, they may not be against Arabs peace agreements as an Independant Palestinian State will allow Hamas to import arms from Iran, Hezbollah, etc. Thus, this will provide a launch pad for them to liberate the rest of "Palestine" from the "Zionists." Syria may also play the same game in a sense. They will "make peace" with Israel, retrieve the Golan, and then break relations with Israel.