
Opinion Trump's Ambassador Is Right on Israel's Annexation. His Posturing, pro-Palestinian Critics Are Wrong
David Friedman is right: International law supports Israel retaining some of the West Bank. I should know – I helped draft it
Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus at Harvard Law School and author of "The Case Against the Democrats Impeaching Trump" (Skyhorse Publishing, 2019). Twitter: @AlanDersh
David Friedman is right: International law supports Israel retaining some of the West Bank. I should know – I helped draft it
Criminalizing the nuanced and messy relationship between the media and politics is a slippery slope that endangers Israel’s democracy and freedom of the press
Overzealous criminal investigations of political figures, in Israel or America, pose a grave danger to democracy.
There is no compelling evidence to suggest Bannon is anti-Semitic. But because bigotry against any group should be disqualifying for high office, I cannot support his appointment.
The international community is disincentivizing the Palestinians from negotiating a two-state solution
Feminists, Islamists and university administrators have all taken extreme measures to protect their 'right' not to be offended. Unfortunately, censorship for this cause is widely accepted in modern democracies.
The contrast between the Israeli and Palestinian leaders’ speeches at the UN couldn’t be clearer: Netanyahu suggested a new pathway to peace, whereas Abbas spewed hateful and unhelpful rhetorical poison.
Qatar and Turkey are among the worst villains in the Gaza tragedy and should be treated as pariahs unless and until they stop becoming state sponsors, supporters and facilitators of terrorism.
Israel is fighting for the entire civilized world against those who would shoot down civilian airliners, whereas Hamas’ rocket fire is condemning more Palestinians to death.
Hamas deliberately places its tunnel entrances in hospitals, schools and mosques: Israel has no choice but to use ground forces to shut them down.
To Gaza’s innocent civilians: Demand a ‘Gaza Spring’ and rid yourself of Hamas’ violent theocrats and kleptocrats, who love Palestinian children less than they hate Israel.
If it’s too late and costly to reoccupy Gaza, even after a ceasefire Israel must impose a forceful siege to prevent the importation of rockets, like those being fired now on Israel’s civilians.
Peter Beinart distorted my position on Iran: I don’t want a military confrontation but I believe the best way to avoid one is through a credible deterrent threat. That doesn't make me a 'hawk.'
There is no moral equivalent between Israel’s rule of law and Hamas’ rule of terror: Every country has its vigilantes, but where Israel pursues them, Hamas celebrates the killers.
Israel’s former PM’s six year prison term is a tragedy for Israel and Jews worldwide. The judge used his long record of public service against him, rather than to his credit.
J Street’s Jeremy Ben-Ami has consistently refused to work together with pro-Israel voices of the center toward a two-state solution. Will he now at least give us a platform?
J Street’s 'Big Tent’ is open only to one side - the anti-Israel and BDS-supporting hard left of its own position; pro-Israel centrists are censored.
The Israel boycott movement threatens the peace process by promoting extortion rather than negotiation, and discourages Palestinians from agreeing to any reasonable peace offer.
He asked me to withhold final judgment on his role in Sabra and Shatila - he said once more material was declassified and the full truth known, his role would be seen in a different light.
Singling out Israelis for an academic boycott is not only a blatant example of double standards; it is an act of complicity with the enduring prejudice against Jews.
Iran remains as committed as ever to obtaining nuclear weapons: The U.S. promised this could not be allowed to happen.
J Street maliciously distorted my clear support for diplomacy in order to appease their hard left constituents, who prefer containment rather than preventing Iran going nuclear.
All reasonable, thinking people - liberals, conservatives, Americans and their allies, the pro-Israel community (without J Street) – should unite against this 'Chamberlain moment' on Iran.
Why is the American media trying so hard to present Iranian President Rohani's remarks in a positive light while bitterly criticizing Israeli PM Netanyahu's rational and compelling speech?
The U.S. President's commitment to preventing Iran going nuclear means he must go to Congress now, before it crosses the red line, and not after, as is now the case with Syria and its use of chemical weapons.
Alice Walker's new book of half-truths and lies paints a cartoonish picture of Jews and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By proving she opposes peace talks, the two-state solution and any rational approach to the conflict, Walker writes herself off as irrelevant.
Unlike terrorist suspects in Israel, the Boston bomber has the basic rights of a criminal defendant; he may seek a highly-publicized execution, or martyrdom, but the targeting of so many civilians will mean it will be hard for the Attorney-General to avoid seeking the death penalty.
For 65 years, Israel has been the target of more condemnation, hatred and enmity than any other nation in the world, including, increasingly, from the center-left and the center, despite its extraordinary achievements.
Ironically, the New York Times' Iron Dome 'expose' was the worst spoiler of Obama's visit, clouding the president's assurances on Israel's security. The good news is the closeness on Iran policy between the U.S. and Israel and the absence of demands for preconditions to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.
It's now more important than ever for Obama to send a message to Tehran that regardless of who heads the Defense Department, U.S. policy is to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.