One does not have to follow any politician blindly, nor does one follow any religious minister blindly. Certainly osme of Bibi's generalisations are nonsense, but same goes for any other politician. If Hilary Clinton's worldview didnt contain any falalcies, then USA could compromise on territory as well, whether their own or their sattelite states, eg Taiwan. It is not argument to say that becasue Gaza is a threat, then it makes no difference having another hamas state in the west bank. That is an absurd argument. And it is not in keeping with traditional American military doctrine. In Cold war Europe, the Americans would station missiles in the UK, despite being able to launch from their own territory. And Strenger seems to think that a palestinian state woudl magically do away with terrorism - but even the Oslo talks and the Camp David talks only emboldened terror, making the intifada wars worse than anything Israel had faced prior to Oslo.
Roadside bomb kills five border officers in western Iraq (AP)
from the article: The fallacy of Netanyahu's worldview