You do understand that Goldstone led a committee of inquiry and not a court sitting in judgement don't yoo? So he and his team had to assess on the basis of corroborated and verifiable evidence whether any crimes may have been committed. He did not have to provide as in a court of law 'forensic' evidence to back up every claim and thus prove beyond doubt the criminal act, nor was he equipped to. The forensics were a bonus and happen to support the 'multiple' source description of events as garnered by the Mission. Objectivity is clearly not on your agenda-is it?
Palestinians: Man, 65, lightly wounded from overnight Israeli airstrikes in Gaza Strip (Haaretz)
from the article: Report: UN evidence counters Israel's account of Gaza war
'Quiet and regular daily routine are a mutual interest and we will strive to keep them,' IDF says.04:42 05.05.16 | 4 comments