Yaakov, You should maybe consider a debating class. The argument of contention is not what you have written in your second post, albeit your second post will come back to be the nail in the coffin for your argument. The argument in contention is as you say, that the zionist (pre Israel as you state in your second post, therefore must be 1947) would never have accepted to have Palestinians as there neighbours. As I noted this is false, you retorted by saying that when you use the word Zionist you mean pre Israel Jews in Palestine, which can only then refer to 1947-8 Partition Plan, which as you clearly state in your second post, the Jews would have surely accepted because it was the best they would get. So Learn to debate and form CLEAR ARGUMENTS, your Argument waivers across several different time periods, but is limited to a definition of persons from one time period, a time period where your argument holds no weight as it is clearly false. U should consider restructuring it.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Hamas: Agreement reached for return to calm on Gaza border with help of Egypt, Qatar, UN (Haaretz)
from the article: Comment / Settlement freeze is like racial segregation in U.S.