Why this phony debate? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • GeneG USA
    • 14.04.12 | 11:47 (IDT)

    Nobody doubts Israel has nuclear and thermonuclear bombs. And it has the missiles to deliver them from land or submarine based launchers when needed. Moreover given the nature of the Arab or Persian mind and Israel’s past experiences with these people it needs such weapons defensively for its preservation. Moreover, everyone knows that had the US not helped Israel when Egypt was winning in 1973, Israel would have in the end used its nuclear weapons on Egypt. Israel has never denied this. There is no ambiguity or exceptionalism. The 1973 attack on Israel was the last one Israel will experience since the Arabs and the Persians came to fully understand the implications and stakes. The only discussion one might have is why Israel won’t comment on its nuclear capability even though all know it has such capability and a rough idea of the extent. I offer the thought that when Israel decided to go forward with the development of nuclear weapons it made an internal deal with itself to never comment. The only worthy debate is why Iran feels the need to have nuclear capability. What can it accomplish by having such weapons since it would never dare to attack Israel directly? It would be suicidal. What changes for Iran when it has nuclear weapons? What changes for Israel? What changes for the US? What changes for the world? I have never seen this discussed. Maybe Haaretz would do the world a favor by writing on that issue. I have my thoughts but will save them for now.

    from the article: Iran, six world powers set for high-stakes nuclear talks
    First published 00:08 14.04.12 | Last updated 00:08 14.04.12
Haaretz Headlines
DLD conference in Tel Aviv, September 8, 2015.
Is Startup Nation fraying at the edges?

South Korea just pushed Israel out of the No. 1 spot for research and development spending. Israel needs to do more to keep up the pace of innovation.

20:30 11.02.16 | 0 comments
New Shin Bet Chief Nadav Argaman.
The challenges facing Israel's new Shin Bet chief: Knives, tunnels, and ISIS propaganda

When asked recently what issue keeps him awake at night, new security service chief replied that it’s the possibility of Hamas carrying out a large-scale surprise attack. It’s now his job to keep that from happening.

06:46 12.02.16 | 0 comments
Labor Party leader Isaac Herzog at his party's convention in Tel Aviv, February 7. 2016.
Israeli Labor Party convention demonstrates deception of highest order

Nearly every delegate at the Tel Aviv conference is happy to declare their belief in the two-state solution, and to explain why it's not yet possible.

18:45 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Haitham Saada's schoolmates stream into the banquet hall in the town of Halhul, north of Hebron.

'We're not a nation of terrorists. We're only trying to defend our country'

Friends and family describe Haitham Saada as a smart and gentle boy – and now a martyr, too. What led up to the Palestinian 14-year-old's death by IDF gunfire one Friday afternoon? His loved ones may never find out.