Three points of dissent, including whether Israel will be able to control the broadcast and where the cameras will be situated, could lead to new tensions over flashpoint site.04:55 07.02.16 | 0 comments
Religion should be religion and state should be state. What religious law decides on identity of people should be one thing: when you go to rabbi, it should matter. But for a democratic state, to decide about the personal identity should be the right of the citizen himself. E.g. if the atheist and patrilineal descent states "I identify myself as Jewish", his/her statement should be accepted directly by the state and not via the religious body. The religious body in turn should retain right to identify a person in all the religious issues. This is the practice in all (or most) democratic states in the world.