Why is the 'Iranian Bomb' always 1-4 years distant? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 20.01.11 | 16:33 (IST)

    What other estimate might an informed analyst make given the evidence available produce? Of 9 nuclear weapons development programs to use as a guide, the shortest in history was the Manhattan Project. The US effort to determine if a bomb could be made started in late 1941. Modern technical means of information gathering would have given strong evidence of the program by late 1943. Detectible preparations for a test started in early 1945, and the test occurred in mid-1945. The Manhattan project required 3-1/2 years to go from first investigation of the problem, to create the industry, and test the bomb. If the question is 'when could Iran have a bomb,' and without strong detailed evidence of the status of the supposed Iranian program, the answer, based upon experience is 1-4 years. The next year, with the same lack of evidence, the opinion will be 1-4 years, and without further detailed information to base an estimate upon, any careful analyst will continue to say 'Iran could have a bomb in one to four years." Meir Dagan spent the whole time he was responsible for producing an estimate, producing just that - an estimate based upon evidence and experience. The error was not in intelligence or analysis. The error was when politicians took a worst case analysis and touted it as both fact and proof of the fact.

    from the article: Dagan brought a possible attack on Iran closer
    First published 01:42 20.01.11 | Last updated 01:42 20.01.11
Haaretz Headlines
A rocket fired from Gaza to Ashkelon on July 15, 2014.
Two rockets fired from Gaza toward Israel

IDF fears escalation in violence in wake of arson that killed Palestinian infant in West Bank.

04:27 02.08.15 | 0 comments
Obama and Netanyahu

Netanyahu, Obama fight for U.S. public opinion

Both leaders to make major speeches this week in what each views as a critical contest to garner support for their opposing stands on the nuclear deal with Iran.

Photos of 18-month-old Palestinian Ali Saad Daobasa, victim of Friday's deadly arson attack.

Like Newtown, baby’s murder won’t change a thing

Israeli right-wing leaders and NRA supporters in America view calls for change as cynical ploys by political opponents.

Roger Waters and Gideon Levy at the singer's home in the Hamptons.

Roger Waters: I hate apartheid, not Israel

Special interview | The former Pink Floyd singer talks to Gideon Levy about his political views, tragic family history – and when the rock star-turned-activist will be happy to play in Israel again.