Why is the 'Iranian Bomb' always 1-4 years distant? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 20.01.11 | 16:33 (IST)

    What other estimate might an informed analyst make given the evidence available produce? Of 9 nuclear weapons development programs to use as a guide, the shortest in history was the Manhattan Project. The US effort to determine if a bomb could be made started in late 1941. Modern technical means of information gathering would have given strong evidence of the program by late 1943. Detectible preparations for a test started in early 1945, and the test occurred in mid-1945. The Manhattan project required 3-1/2 years to go from first investigation of the problem, to create the industry, and test the bomb. If the question is 'when could Iran have a bomb,' and without strong detailed evidence of the status of the supposed Iranian program, the answer, based upon experience is 1-4 years. The next year, with the same lack of evidence, the opinion will be 1-4 years, and without further detailed information to base an estimate upon, any careful analyst will continue to say 'Iran could have a bomb in one to four years." Meir Dagan spent the whole time he was responsible for producing an estimate, producing just that - an estimate based upon evidence and experience. The error was not in intelligence or analysis. The error was when politicians took a worst case analysis and touted it as both fact and proof of the fact.

    from the article: Dagan brought a possible attack on Iran closer
    First published 01:42 20.01.11 | Last updated 01:42 20.01.11
Haaretz Headlines
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Feb. 8, 2016.

Bill: Suspend MKs for denying Israel as Jewish, democratic

New version of bill replaces 'unbecoming behavior' with three new criteria for suspension from Knesset to win support of the ultra-Orthodox UTJ faction.

MK Hanin Zoabi being removed from the podium at the Knesset, February 8, 2016.

Lawmakers approve 'NGO bill' in first reading

Provision requiring employees of non-profits vising Knesset to wear identifying tags taken out at Netanyahu's request.

Jewish settlers throws rocks toward Palestinian during clashes near the Jewish settlement of Yitzhar

No one in Israel has a monopoly over radicalism

The tempo of mutual delegitimization between Israel's political extremes is accelerating. Are we nearing the point where left and right can no longer co-exist?

Venice celebrating its famous Carnival, in January 2016.
Can Ruth Bader Ginsburg help save a dying Jewish community?

The Venice community commemorates the 500th anniversary of the world’s first ghetto with events that include the U.S. Supreme Court justice in a production of Shakespeare’s ‘The Merchant of Venice.’

13:06 08.02.16 | 0 comments