Why is Golan a discussion for peace?? The Syrians attacked Israel. Israel in Return fought back. Syrians were pushed back and they lost thier Real Estate. In addition Israel must keep it for security reasons since Syria attacked Israel. When there is WAR and blood is lost in WAR you can't return the land that was lost in WAR for peace if it helps defend your country. Syria cant expect Israel to just give it back. You cant eat the whole pie. Its one sided for Syria, What if Israel lost the WAR whould Syria return land back? You cant attack and loose a WAR then request land back for peace. Syria never thought they would loose this land. Today its strategic for Israel to keep this land to defense itself. Why should Israel take a chance to give it back and place itself in a voulnerable position??
Iraq prepares troops for offensive to retake Mosul (Reuters)
from the article: Sarkozy told: Fresh Israel-Syria talks unlikely
The MK and former finance minister, who founded his party in 2012, will be in charge until end of the next Knesset, which is potentially 2023.17:57 12.02.16 | 0 comments