Why does he bother making such inane statements? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '101'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Rammer
    • 28.03.11 | 22:40 (IST)

    The excellent news analysis by The Associated Press explains exactly why Abbas no longer has his ears attuned to Israel and Washington, so I’ll not go into that. My question is, Why does Netanyahu make such inane and irrelevant statements, and does he fool anyone? I cannot see the Palestinians re-focusing on Israel no matter what happens in Paris in two weeks or in New York in September. I hope that Hamas puts its country’s interest ahead of the venal interests of its leaders so that national reconciliation can be achieved. Hamas should certainly scale back some of its demands, and it should devise a formula of qualified recognition of Israel that meets international criteria. But should Hamas refuse to do any of this, and should the PA fail, as a result, in its efforts for unilateral statehood, I still cannot see Abbas turning back to Israel with hat in hand. He will have to dissolve the PA, or his people would do it for him. In either case we will default to the much-abhorred single state. I am not at all a fan of the single state because it will not solve any of the problems, and will add quite a few. But chasing after a peace bid with Israel is no longer an option for the Palestinians even if Netanyahu’s government falls tomorrow and a more moderate politician moves in. There simply is no interlocutor in Israel. The Jazeera leaks have shown how little Livni was willing to give in. Hence there are only two possible outcomes from the current impass: Unilateral statehood, followed by admission into the UN and sanctions if necessary, or the single state.

    from the article: Netanyahu to Abbas: You can't have peace with both Israel and Hamas
    First published 21:50 28.03.11 | Last updated 21:50 28.03.11
Haaretz Headlines
An Israeli army post opposite to a Hamas military post on the Gaza border.
IDF: Artillery fired at soldiers near Gaza border

No injuries or damage were sustained, army says.

07:37 06.05.16 | 0 comments
Britain's opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn leaves after an election campaign poster laun

Amid anti-Semitism furor, U.K. voters look set to punish Labour in local vote

The elections have been framed as a test of Corbyn's first months in charge of Labour after he shifted the party's political stance sharply to the left.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu / State Comptroller Yitzhak Shapira

PM's associates blast draft Gaza war report as 'biased, politicking'

Senior officials who saw the draft report, first published by Haaretz, said comptroller found serious shortcomings in Israel's preparedness against tunnel threat.

Setting fire to an Israeli flag in Iran (2013)

Not every Israel critic is an Israel hater

Israel’s critics run the gamut from Jew-haters to people who have the country’s best interests in mind. Lumping all together as anti-Semites is a big mistake.