Why are you obsessed with only one of the three occupations - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '1'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Menachem
    • 07.01.11 | 19:07 (IST)

    Of the three occupations of the West Bank in recent history, your ilk is totally obsessed with one as being illegal. Oddly, its the wrong one. You are also selective, in which settlers you consider illegal. Why is that? Are you really certain that the massive influx of Arabs from the many surrounding Arab countries, each with their existing nationality, under the British administration, were legal. Why? Because Britain said so? Did anyone ask the local Jews and local Arabs if they agreed. Dud anyone ask the Turks who ruled the entire area for five centuries? No. And now to the next occupation, the Jordanian occupation which you presumably regard as legal because Jordanians are not Jews. Simple. Maybe not, if you consider that Jordan (already having been given 78% of Palestine by Winston Churchill in 1920) launched an all-out war of annihilation against the Jews in 1948 and thereby came into possession of the West Bank and Jerusalem. Do you consider those who then occupied the land to be "illegal settlers"? The one and only LEGAL occupation came about when Jordan, not satisfied with having everything their Arab kin are now demanding, launched one more total war to destroy Israel. Israel's LEGAL response left it in possession of the territories - the very first legal occupant fopr a long time. Live with it.

    from the article: Jordan to Netanyahu: Commitment to peace is not enough, take practical action
    First published 04:25 06.01.11 | Last updated 08:06 06.01.11
Haaretz Headlines
DLD conference in Tel Aviv, September 8, 2015.
Is Startup Nation fraying at the edges?

South Korea just pushed Israel out of the No. 1 spot for research and development spending. Israel needs to do more to keep up the pace of innovation.

15:37 12.02.16 | 0 comments
The synagogue at Bahad 1.
How many synagogues does IDF need?

The IDF has seen an unprecedented growth in synagogues, most of it with foreign funds; meanwhile, non-Jewish soldiers suffice with praying in improvised shacks.

16:01 12.02.16 | 0 comments
Labor Party leader Isaac Herzog at his party's convention in Tel Aviv, February 7. 2016.
Israeli Labor Party convention demonstrates deception of highest order

Nearly every delegate at the Tel Aviv conference is happy to declare their belief in the two-state solution, and to explain why it's not yet possible.

18:45 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Haitham Saada's schoolmates stream into the banquet hall in the town of Halhul, north of Hebron.

'We're not a nation of terrorists. We're only trying to defend our country'

Friends and family describe Haitham Saada as a smart and gentle boy – and now a martyr, too. What led up to the Palestinian 14-year-old's death by IDF gunfire one Friday afternoon? His loved ones may never find out.