The biggest issue in the peace process aside from the players is interest. Palestnians want State, Israel wants 100% guarantee on security, seems fair. Both want lots of land. So if we could do business along these lines, with punishments for infringement we could move forward. Punishment, may be equal, even if the crimes are not, as killing civilians is exponentially worse than building houses on disputed lands (Labharas fake court cases). No Settlements, No Siege; but security infringment, however minor, doesn't mean a resumption of settlements or siege, they mean the ceding and withdrawal of claim to land of value. like Jerusalem or Hebron. INTL Community if you have an actual interest than pursue along the lines of an Economist not a Humanitarian, the Humanitarian will give till they have nothing & then what use are they? The Economist will find the assets of value & organize a matrix that reflects this based on the interests of groups involved and hence sureties of value.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Tunisia explosion death toll rises to 13 (AP)
from the article: U.S. lawmakers to Obama: Press Israel to ease Gaza siege