We had a US President who preferred not to talk with our enemies, George Bush. While I generally supported him, this particular policy proved to be self-defeating. With that history right before our very eyes, why would Al Ahram, a news organization after all, adopt such a policy? Other than cutting their readers off from an important news source, what is their goal?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Talks over including Syria's Aleppo in 'regime of calm' continue, Russian official says (Reuters)
from the article: Egypt media group agrees on massive Israel boycott