I'm having trouble understanding this. It is a crime to deny the Shoah, a provable, generally known historical fact. It is also a crime to avow Israel's possession of nuclear weapons, another provable, generally known historical fact. Also, Israel considers itself to be a democratic State which guarantees free speech to its citizens. Vanunu is an Israeli, but he cannot exercise free speech by speaking to foreigners--regardless of the subject of such speech. The contradiction meter just went off the scale.
U.K. is offering 4,000 resettlement spaces for Syrian refugees, UNHCR spokeswoman says (Reuters)
from the article: Vanunu convicted of violating order barring foreign contacts