What is the benefit to Olmert? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Tosefta
    • 18.12.07 | 16:13 (IST)

    Of course allowing construction in the settlements is a violation of the first stage of the Roadmap Olmert has just committed to in Annapolis. It may not be a big deal provided that Olmert get some real benefit from it. But this is questionable. Olmert's highest priority is to remain in office, not to make peace. Peace can be delayed, according to his thinking, but if he is out of office then what is the point to it? To remain in office comfortably, Olmert needs his coalition intact, including Lieberman. If this violation of the Roadmap gets Lieberman to stay, then it was worth it. But Lieberman said he would leave once the core issues get to being discussed. If so, why not let him go and stick to the Roadmap so that Israel looks like an honorable state that fulfills its obligations? In absolute terms, building inside the settlements does not change things much. Just a few more settlers to evacuate. This is so unless the Palestinians choose to make an issue out of it. For example, they might threaten to freeze peace talks unless Israel stops this policy. But this is unlikely to happen; too much money coming from the Paris conference, and too much to skim off this bonanza. So I suspect the Palestinian leadership will swallow this frog, but at the cost that the Palestinian people will lose even more respect towards their present leaders. Ultimately, this might prove costly to peace.

    from the article: Officials: Israel to allow construction in existing W. Bank settlements
    First published 00:00 17.12.07 | Last updated 00:00 17.12.07
Haaretz Headlines
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) and U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter

'Powers aren't sharing Iran deal details with Israel'

Despite promises, Israel is missing entire parts of the nuclear agreement, which makes assessing its consequences impossible, National Security Adviser Yossi Cohen tells lawmakers.

Smoke billows from buildings in Quneitra

Report: Israel strikes in Syria, five killed

Two Hezbollah activists and three Syrian militiamen of the National Defence Forces, were reportedly killed in the attack in the Syrian Golan Heights.

Demolition in Beit El, July 29, 2015

Demolition of illegal West Bank structures begins

Court rejects appeal to prevent demolition in Beit El; Habayit Hayehudi MK: It is the High Court that should be demolished.

Shaked Hadad

Where are Gaza's ex-settlers now?

Ten Israelis who were forced to leave their homes recount their often precarious existences since.