Syria's FM explicitly said that in the event of an outside attack on Syria that they would use chemical weapons against the attacker. I strongly strongly doubt that the 300 estimate takes the FM's promise into account. While I do not think there is a better solution than attack if Syria were to collapse or try to transfer the wepaons, citing a esitmate of 300 is almost a come-on for an attack. The repercussions should be taken much more seriously, even if in the end the attack must take place either way.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
CNN: Ex-Texas Gov. Perry endorses Trump, says he's open to VP run (Reuters)