All those paragraphs, and not one single word about ***why*** the judge said he would not issue that injunction. Plenty of words about what the petitioners were arguing. Plenty of words explaining why the state agreed with the basic thrust of the petition. Plenty of words stating that the judge said "no" to the petition. But not one word explaining the REASONS given by the judge for saying "no". He did give a reason, didn't he, for saying "no"? Didn't he?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
U.S. says it killed 10 AQAP Islamist militants in four air strikes in Yemen since April 23 (Reuters)
from the article: High Court rejects petition to stop building in West Bank outpost