I really don't understand how Ha'aretz can call itself an honored journalistic publication after having read such an empty article riddled with slogans and bias. Israel's "Apartheid" which does not exist on paper is worse then SA's official one because it's "indefinitely temporary". Yitzhak Laor, you are correct. How do you wish Israel and the US impose to end the temporary situation and bring in peace? Does peace come after "Apartheid" and what happens if you remove an Apartheid that never existed? I think the opinionated person should be careful to understand what he is witnessing, and applying the correct terms. Otherwise, he is guilty of misrepresenting the facts. That isn't journalism.
Suspected assailant in car-ramming attack in West Bank shot (Haaretz)
from the article: Israel's apartheid is worse than South Africa's