So, the High Court decision said there was no way to determine whether the cuase of death was from a rock thrown by Palestinians or a rubber bullet fired by border police. Yet a CIVIL case apparently ruled against the border police on the SAME evidence? Huh? It would seem that the coroner's report and opinions should count here. Did the district court just decide it knows better then the corononer what the cause of death was? This whole thing raises about 100 questions, none of which are answered in this article. I think we are entitled to a little more depth. We are, instead, merely being spoon fed what they want to give us.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Turkey's Erdogan: UN must prevent 'ethnic cleansing' in Syria, stop Iranian 'massacre' (Reuters)
from the article: Court holds state responsible for shooting of Palestinian girl