"Pseudoanalogy?? You are really very misguided. The issue is about diplomacy with countries that are tyrranies where a signature is at best a means to an end like Chamberlain, likewith Stalin, like with N Korea." Very funny, your analogies. How was Stalin handled by USA and Britain? Diplomatically, or do you recall any war? How was communist China handled since 1949? Diplomatically, and the Americans avoided strictly to cross the Yalu when they had the chance. How is North Korea today handled by the USA? Diplomatically, or is there a war going on without my knowledge? You are clinging desperately to Chamberlain as the one and only "proof" that diplomacy does not work while actually 99,9% of world history was made by diplomacy.
Army: Blast in Korean DMZ wounds two South Korean soldiers (Reuters)
from the article: And now for Iran