In America the Football pundits and the Stock Market analysts always talk about intangibles. Scientists and Biologists dont use such language I think. In the sciences I guess they look at things absolutely otherwise it wouldnt be science,would it? Textiles on the other hand have inconsistencies and to people that understand them they understand that. Its the same with this situation.Its not an absolute science.Its quite frankly difficult to have one when the story even officially changes every three minutes never mind the innuendos. Politics is that. You want to put your scientific interface on this political game and for the most part people are not buying the goods. In the case of Shallit the issue is not huge but its like the cherry on a cake.Its the point that can help the whole situation. To me its not science its common sense.Obviously you dont think the Palestinians have such a thing.Give Shallit and hear internationally 'Look did you see what Hamas did?'
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
UN secretary-general calls for repercussions over strike on Syrian refugee camp (AP)
from the article: The hot-air summit