Here is his logic: 1. Abbas and Hamas presently discuss unification. 2. Hamas are presently engaged in terror. 3. Conclude: Once there is unification, Abbas will also be a terrorist. 4. Grand conclusion: If the UN establishes a Palestinian state, it will be a terror state.// Of course, the main flaw in the argument, which every UN member can detect no matter how unintelligent: Since Abbas is against terror, who can tell what the result of the unification will be? Why not use the same "Lieberman logic" to conclude that since Abbas is not a terrorist, the union will also not be a terrorist?
Jordan foreign minister says to speak with Kerry on Israel-Palestinian conflict (Reuters)
from the article: Israel lodges formal complaint with UN over barrage of Gaza mortars