Pellivert has not been following the story. Toaf has already stated that his book is being misinterpreted, and that he didn't mean to claim that any blood rituals had *actually* been performed. The issue isn't just "those anti-Semites". The issue is prominent anti-Semites like the Foreign Minister of Syria, who has published a book on the Blood Libel that is the equivalent of the Protocols of Zion in the amount of damage being done to Jews in the Muslim world. In this article, Pellivert is being Euro-centric and not considering how the Blood Libel is an active instrument in the "clash of civilizations". *Active* is the key word here. It requires pro-active work by us all to counter such deadly weapons. Will Pellivert cry tears of blood when Iranian Jews are executed after being accused of the Blood Libel, among other trumped-up crimes?
International investigators to probe several cases of Syria chemical attacks (AP)
from the article: And supposing they did drink blood?