to settler apologists - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • anna - not the settler
    • 05.06.05 | 22:42 (IDT)

    Settlers and their sympathizers use every possible argument from the past to justify their criminal enterprise (which they do not consider criminal, of course. But most criminals justify their actions - that's human nature). To us here, it seems like endless, pointless carping on the past - like who was whose uncle. What difference does it make now? the justifications really don't matter. The situation is simple: israelis (some of them with some government encouragement) wanted more land. They grabbed it. When local inhabitants resisted they were suppressed. yes, this can apply to Israel itself too, but, in the interest of compromise, a line has to be drawn somewhere. most palestinians will accept israel pre-1967. The arabs will too, as they declared through support of the saudi initiative (which was all but ignored in Israel). It is israel that won't accept compromise now. And the compromise is - live withinn the '67 borders and peace will have a chance. Will it get rid of all extremists? no. But even in america, we have sporadic attacks by right wing malicia like extremists. If that's what israel will have to confront oncew it withdraws and a peace treaty is signed, I have every confidence it will be manageable. In the meantime - forget the mufti. The issue are the settlements and only them. And until they go, I and many other past contributors to israel in the US, will be contributing to other causes (as many of us have for quite some time).

    from the article: Yavin discovered the darkness
    First published 00:00 05.06.05 | Last updated 00:00 04.06.05
Haaretz Headlines
National Security Adviser Yossi Cohen.

New Mossad chief Yossi Cohen secretly visited Washington

Cohen, who assumed new position last month, met with CIA chief John Brennan and National Security Adviser Susan Rice, among others, 10 days ago.

Donald Trump, with Jeb Bush in the background, following the CBS Republican debate.

Trump tempts fate by slaying sacred Republican cows

By pinning the blame for 9/11 on George W. Bush, Trump goes where even Democrats fear to tread.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Netanyahu realizes: there are worse options than the EU

After three months in which his spat with the European Union achieved nothing other than damaging Israel’s image, the prime minister recognizes it is time to put away 'national pride.'

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman

Welcome to the one-state club, Thomas Friedman

The most famous columnist in the world, who always reflects and shapes the mood in Washington, has finally realized that the two-state solution is dead.