not a justification of the weak to aggrevate the strong with the strong being unable to respond unless they reduce their abilities to that of the weak. Essentially, how is your point not stating then that a weaker party, even if the aggressor, has the right to dictate the terms and weapons in an engagement. Your posts effectively tries to eat away at the competitive advantage that Israel holds. So I ask why should this not happen in business too? And if you can see my logic, then why should this happen in countries? Furthermore, if this yours was an Evident claim why would there be a need for 1977 Additional Protocols to GCIV where the law of proportionality can be found. A legal doctirne that ISRAEL AS WELL AS USA Signed and then backed out of, using identical language.
U.S. defense contractor accused of copying secret military documents (Reuters)
from the article: Berkeley's Israel boycott: The occupation's new friend