Lisa, If Israel has the 4th largest army Y should it not be allowed to use this ability? Why must it downgrade its abilities for the purposes of giving Hamas an easier chance? I mean honestly, how does that statement make any sense to you. X= really strong, Y =not so strong. Y wants to kill X, should X only fight with their weak hand? How does this make sense, please elaborate. But if your views apply to protecting civilians, what are your views to the following: Israel states, next rocket is all out war, and provides buses for all non combatants to leave combat area, under UN protection, with full right of return to what will later be rubble, rebuit by Israel. In turn, all of Gaza is declared a war zone with only combatants? Would it then be fair? or is it because Hamas doesn't have equal military ability. How is that Israel fault, or even israel's care, why should you give a bigger gun to the a person who wants to kill you? your logic dictates Israel take Risk 4 Hamas Y?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Russia warns of new Cold War as east Ukraine violence surges (Reuters)
from the article: Pro-Mideast in America: Getting past 'Pro-Israel' and 'Pro-Palestine'
Hamas tunnel threat burrows into minds of Israeli military, political leaders
Hamas may have told Israel it isn’t looking for another war in Gaza, but it’s clearly desperate to advance its attack tunnels. It’s also delighted to be sowing seeds of discontent and concern among the Israeli public.04:19 13.02.16 | 0 comments