You say: "Taking in account the facts on the ground requires compromise, which came in the form of resolution 181, wich the Jews accepted, and the Arabs rejected." I love the way the Zionist flacks use a non-binding UN General Assembly resolution (as are ALL General Assembly resolutions) as some sort of Holy Writ to validate the legitimacy of Israel, but then feel free to ignore or reject ALL the other UN resolutions that don't go the way Israel and its supporters might like, including all those Security Council resolutions that are dismissed as merely "recommendations" under UN procedures. Of course, the USA makes sure that no really binding resolution against Israel can ever get passed, then complains loudly that the UN is ineffective and can't seem to get anything done! What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander - if the Zionist Jews can claim the ability to ignore with impunity all unfavorable UN resolutions because they are non-binding, the the Palestinians and all other Arab countries must also be free to do the same without being required to pay any price for their refusal to go along with all the bull. I have to wonder what Warren in Australia or his white countrymen would do if the UN General Assembly passed a resolution giving back 55% of Australia to the true aborigines of their country. They would merely give a good laugh and ignore it. The same goes with any other people who might be the victims of such parliamentary foolishness. H--l - DNA studies have shown that everyone is descended from an African Eve of some several thousands of years back. So let's just give the world back to the Africans and have done with it!
India floods derail two trains, killing at least 20; hundreds rescued (Reuters)
from the article: Think before you sing `Hatikva'