"Occupation requires the co-operation of those occupied. Don`t give it..." I think you are mistaken on many things, notably, permission. But let's examine this. In your view then, if Israel was to complete a full withdrawal to 1967 borders, not including jerusalem as it annexed it and USA CONGRESS AGREED, but even for this argument lets say EJ was in there too. What happens if Israel was attacked again by palestinians, what is your view for legitimate recourse? especially if it was like it is here, with the involvement of the PA, THE STATE ACTORS? According to GCIV israel would have right to Occupy the lands. So according to your argument, should Israel still be forced to pay the "economic and political costs of occupying people`s land that does not belong to them" or is SECURITY OF THEIR CITIZENS VALID ENOUGH And if that is the case, how does today differ? TBC....
Jordan foreign minister says to speak with Kerry on Israel-Palestinian conflict (Reuters)
from the article: MESS Report / Israel threatens PA: 'fight violence or we will'