Now, if Annexation is allowed in DEFENSIVE WARS AND If the breaking of an armstice resumes a war AND If Syria and Egpyt broke the armstice via several actions AND If Jordan joined the war on its own accord AND If Israel when faced with aggressors, conquered Jerusalem, Annexed it and offered citzenship to the residents there. THEN, There should be formal recognition, once we take case facts and apply a subjective ruling to them we destroy the objective standing of law, the impartiality of law, the blindness of justice etc... A 10 year old with limited VB knowledge could write that line of code. What you have highlighted are the Subjective UN security council rulings that state NO, but do not refute the objective claims, they highlight the issue I am asserting. They highlight the unholy fusion of subjectivity to law, of Political Interests into INTL Law, and that makes a Farce out of law.
Australian police arrest 5 over shooting 'linked to terrorism' (Reuters)
from the article: IDF official: Neither Israel nor PA wants violence