"once the arabs unleashed the yom kippur war, [...] the pals, no longer under jordanian rule, felt free, [...] to lay a claim to certain territories, such as gaza and the west bank." (CJK) This screams for an explanation. What, in your views, should the Palestinians have done, after having been freed from Jordanian rule (in June '67, not by the Kippur war, oct '73) instead of laying claim to certain territories such as Gaza and the West Bank? Please enlight me. I would much appreciate. Ps: If you find the question too embarrassing to answer, don't. I will understand.
UN experts: North Korea continues to evade UN sanctions (AP)
from the article: Would Israel accept a state-and-a-half solution?