Chris, you apparently assume that "peace" depends only on ISRAEL-which is a way to put responsability of whatever happens in the Middle East on ISRAEL's side. The examples you give are so deprived of logic and coherence (you pu on the same level those who are supposed to have lost their homes, with hostile actions in GAZA, etc...). Please try to have a more balanced perspective on the conflict. There would be another way to look at IRON DOME: what if the palestinians (as welle as HEZBOLLAH and arab countries don't be too naÏve), at lat being aware that there actions could not harm ISRAEL, would then be obliged to negociate with realistic demands? And why not look at the fact that civilians in ISRAEL would at last be protected against rockets from all around (GAZA, LEBANON, and in the future a possible other arab country, since they are all so unstable)?
U.S. says it killed 10 AQAP Islamist militants in four air strikes in Yemen since April 23 (Reuters)
from the article: Iron Dome success excites, but army balks at the bill