...without any hard evidence slanders another neutral country? Prints liabelous responses that pressupposses Israel's guilt without any evidence regarding its involvement. You make a point, but your point is nothing without proof, I make a point and my point holds weight becuase your point lacks proof. Or is it ok because its Israel? in which case can Israel say, Iran has WMDs and Bush and Blair will send the troops in? Was War in Iraq justified because it was based faulty and or lack of information? and if so then I guess the current treatment Israel is receving from your country, England France and others is justified. Or is it ok because you are talking about Israel who should be judged by a different standard.
First refugees travelling on Hungarian bus arrive at Austrian border (Reuters)
from the article: Germany, France also request Israeli answers on Dubai fake passports