1) Legalities over whose waters this was when the ship is just a single minor issue and I am not sure on the legality of this incident but the boarding of the Mavi Mara in international waters was legal under the Helsinki Principles. 2) The palestinians have a right to defend themselves when attacked ( not fire rockets into Israel or carry our suicide bombings ). Thats what the weapons are wanted for. Israel has taken official responsibility to place a legal blockade on Gaza to stop weapons smuggling for a reason of self defense. 3) What exactly do casualty figures have to do with anything? This is an ongoing war.. it might be that only 1 side has hi-tec weapons but low tec kills as well. Do you think Israel should have allowed the weapons to be sent to Hamas to be used against Israel out of a sense of fair play? War is not about who has what its about the fact you both have a reason not to like each other and ti fight each other. Also the days of chivalry and fair play are long dead today people fight to win by all means. Do you think in Afghaniatsn where the Taliban are only using low tec weapons the US troops should leave the hi-tec equipment at home because the other guy doesn't have any of its own and we should have a level playing field? Come on this is the real world.
Turkey's Erdogan warns Russia not to 'play with fire' regarding downed Russian warplane (Reuters)
from the article: Netanyahu: Arms on seized ship came from Iran via Syria
State says nobody has a right to sell the drafts on the open market for a profit, as this infringes on the state's right to keep an asset 'of deep symbolic significance' that belongs to the state and the public.01:40 27.11.15 | 0 comments
Unveiled at industry conference, plan takes top treasury official by surprise.00:02 27.11.15 | 0 comments