This step is merely a gentle reminder to Panetta that he should step up pressure on Israel - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '108'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '9'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Rammer
    • 31.12.11 | 19:55 (IST)

    Netanyahu is right in assuming that the US will resist Palestinian membership in the UN agencies, specially the GA and the ICC. He is also right in thinking that when Palestine gains admission to these agencies (as is bound to happen despite US opposition) the US will fight any anti-Israeli action that Palestine tries to take at the ICC. The US will do all this because of the simple fact that Congress is on the payroll of the Jewish Lobby. What Netanyahu is not taking sufficiently into consideration is that the US will not really enjoy doing any of that, since it entails a heavy payment in US influence in the ME and credibility worldwide. To avoid getting drawn into Israel’s swamps and quick sands, the US has chosen to negotiate a package settlement with the Palestinians. Israel is totally out of the loop in these negotiations and will eventually have to accept the outcome, whatever it is. The first step to agree to a package with the Palestinians is to get Hamas to join the PLO umbrella. The reason is simple. It is not convenient for the US (or any of the Powers) to deal with two warring Palestinian governments; and a peace agreement with the West Bank only, leaving Gaza a breakaway province, is not feasible. Therefore Palestinian unity is a pre-condition of any settlement that the US wants to arrange for the Palestinians. The US seems so far to have succeeded in spearheading a Hamas-PLO convergence; but it does not seem to be moving quickly enough in beating Israel back. So a little tap on Panetta’s shoulder is in order. And it is Panetta who is running the show, not Obama, not Clinton, and not the Jewish pointmen in the State Department. Obama and Clinton are in the loop only slightly more than Netanyahu and Lieberman, and that is a good thing.

    from the article: Palestinian Authority to turn to UN Security Council over Israeli settlements
    First published 18:52 31.12.11 | Last updated 18:52 31.12.11
Haaretz Headlines
PM Benjamin Netanyahu attends weekly cabinet meeting at his office in Jerusalem. August 16, 2015.

Israel defiant as Obama gains Iran deal support

Netanyahu unlikely to recede from U.S. campaign against the agreement, despite Obama's success in garnering enough Senate support to ensure passage of deal.

President Barack Obama addresses AIPAC convention in Washington, D.C., May 22, 2011.

How Obama defeated AIPAC on Iran

After Iraq, Democrats didn't want to vote for war.

A round from an automatic weapon fired at Kibbutz Nativ Ha'Asara, September 2, 2015.

Live rounds fired at kibbutz on Gaza border

IDF believes the firing was accidental and came from northern part of the strip.

An Israeli soldier detains a Palestinian boy during a protest.

Israel's 'Eric Garner moment' and victim-blaming

Even when arresting children, Israel insists it has the moral upper hand: In the Nabi Saleh incident, Israel's 'Eric Garner moment' cast the soldier, not the kids, as the innocent victim.